Abkhazia moves to flush out Georgian troops

Abkhazia moves to flush out Georgian troops

SUKHUMI, Georgia (AP) — Separatist forces in Georgia’s breakaway province of Abkhazia launched air and artillery strikes to drive Georgian troops from their bridgehead in the region, officials said.

Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili said later Saturday that Georgian forces rebuffed the Abkhazian attacks. “Our men there are in high spirits,” he said.

The Abkhazian move was prompted by Georgia’s military action to regain control over another breakaway province, South Ossetia, which began Friday, said Sergei Shamba, foreign minister in Abkhazia’s separatist government.

He said that Abkhazia had to act because it has a friendship treaty with South Ossetia.

Both regions have run their own affairs without international recognition since splitting from Georgia in the early 1990s and have built up ties with Moscow. Russia has granted its passports to most of their residents.

Shamba said Abkhazian forces intended to push Georgian forces out of the Kodori Gorge. The northern part of the gorge is the only area of Abkhazia that has remained under Georgian government control.

Georgia’s Security Council secretary Alexander Lomaia said that Georgian administrative buildings in the Kodori Gorge were bombed, but he blamed the attack on Russia.

In 2006, Georgian forces moved into the upper part of the Kodori Gorge to root out members of a defiant militia. Georgia later established a local administration made up of people who fled the fighting in Abkhazia.

Abkhazian and Russian officials have said they believe Georgia intends to launch an offensive from there to retake Abkhazia and demanded the withdrawal of Georgian troops from the area.

Shamba said the Abkhazian forces had to act because diplomatic efforts to settle the dispute over Georgia’s presence in the gorge had failed. “Georgian forces in the Kodori Gorge posed a real threat,” Shamba said.

Israel and the US behind the Georgian aggression?

Israel and the US behind the Georgian aggression?

Shraga Elam

August 9, 2008

There is an obvious Israeli involvement in the present conflict between Georgia and Russia. There are hundreds of Israeli military advisers in Georgia and this is not just the claim of the rather unreliable DebkaFile but also the more respected Ha’aretz expert Yossi Melman, the daily Ma’ariv and also the rather reliable website “News First Class” (NFC).

Melman wrote on 25.6.2008 that Georgia became a real El Dorado for Israeli arms dealers and numerous representatives of the army and intelligence services. Some former generals like Israel Ziv and Gal Hirsh (with his company Defensive Shield) are very active there.

“Gal Hirsh and Israel Ziv are mainly training and consulting Georgian arm units. They are using the “chain” method common among Israeli arm dealers: a main contractor wins a tender and employs then sub-contractors – in this case Israeli officers and former Shin Beth employees,” wrote Melman.

According to him there was a project to sell Merkava tanks to Georgia, but allegedly the Israeli foreign ministry prevented the deal and a policy was outlined that only defensive weapons are allowed to be sold.

Just the same Russia protested agains the Israeli military support to Georgia after an Israeli produced UAV was shot down. On August 5 Israel reiterated its official policy that it allegedly sells only defensive and not offensive weapon systems to Georgia. This is the version published e.g. in the Jerusalem Post; other sources, like the Israeli daily Ma’ariv on 8.8, claim that Israel decided to stop altogether the military support to Georgia. Just the same Ma’ariv points out that the Georgian defense minister, David Kezerashvili, lived for a while in Israel and speaks Hebrew. In a lengthy article the military exports to Georgia are described. Ma’ariv estimates them to be of a value of at least USD 300 million. An Israeli marketing expert told Ma’ariv: “To every Israeli agent representing an Israeli defense company is attached a cousin of the defense minister, who opens the doors for him.”

Also NFC confirms the massive presence of Israeli advisers in Georgia and writes: “The Israeli military industries upgraded in recent years the Georgian air force, sold unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), advanced artillery systems and trained infantry units.” (9.8) The NFC claims that according to sources in Washington in Moscow the war started because Georgia wants to reverse Israel’s decision and achieve the continuation of the support. Israel, according to NFC, conceded to the Russian threatening that it would otherwise go through with the sale of its most advanced anti-aircraft missile system S-300 to Iran and Syria.

Actually the opposite conclusion is also possible, namely that Israel wants to pressure Russia not to sell the S-300 and stop its support to Iran.

The Israeli website DebkaFile, that is known to publish mainly conspiracy theories, believes that up to 1,000 Israeli advisors are active in planning and implementing the present Georgian military action (8.8). This conclusion sounds plausible.

Actually it has to be taken into consideration that also U.S. “consultants” are helping the Georgian army, as according to Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman, there are 127 U.S. military trainers there, of whom about 35 are civilian contractors.

In addition to the trainers, 1,000 soldiers from the Vicenza, Italy-based Southern European Task Force (Airborne) and the Kaiserslautern-based 21st Theater Sustainment Command, along with Marine reservists with the 3rd Battalion, 25th Marines out of Ohio, and the state of Georgia’s Army National Guard’s 1st Battalion, 121st Infantry participated in “Immediate Response 2008.”

Operation Immediate Response 2008 was held from July 15-July 30, with U.S. personnel training about 600 troops at a former Soviet base near Tbilisi, the largest city and capital of Georgia. The goal of this operation was allegedly teaching combat skills for missions in Iraq. The Marines left already the country, but not the airmen.

It is obvious that there are numerous Israeli and U.S. interests in Georgia and it is highly likely that they are behind the dangerous Georgian move.

US condemns ‘dangerous’ Russian response in South Ossetia

NOW UKRAINE THREATENS TO JUMP INTO THE FRAY. US FINALLY GETTING BREAKAWAY REPUBLICS TO WAGE WAR OF REVENGE AGAINST FORMER SOVIET MASTERS.

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZENSKI’S “WET DREAM”

US condemns ‘dangerous’ Russian response

in South Ossetia

Mark Tran

The US today condemned Russia for its “dangerous and disproportionate” action against Georgia and warned of long-term damage to relations between Washington and Moscow.

“We’re alarmed by this situation,” James Jeffrey, the US deputy national security adviser, told reporters in Beijing where George Bush, the US president, was attending the Olympics.

He said the US had made it clear to the Russians their continued escalation in the conflict with Georgia over its breakaway province of South Ossetia could seriously harm US-Russia ties.

Jeffrey said the US would be “very, very concerned” if reports of Russian ground attacks in Georgia, a US ally, were accurate.

Georgia is the third-largest troop contributor after the US and Britain in the US-led war in Iraq. But the Georgian contingent – among Georgia’s best troops – is preparing to leave to join the fighting against Russia in South Ossetia.

The US military will provide transport for the 2,000 troops, but the arrangements have not been finalised, said Colonel Bondo Maisuradze, the commander of the Georgia brigade.

“We are almost ready to redeploy,” Maisuradze told the Associated Press. “Our government has requested the removal of all our forces, but we are still waiting for the flight schedule.”

Georgian troops moved last year from the relatively safe Green Zone in Baghdad to an area southeast of the capital to help block supplies being smuggled to Shia extremists from Iran.

Amid fears that hostilities between Russia and Georgia could spread, Ukraine has warned Russia it could bar Russian navy ships from returning to their base in the Crimea because of their deployment to Georgia’s coast.

Ukraine’s foreign ministry said in a statement on its website the deployment could draw Ukraine into the conflict, and in such a situation Ukraine would have the right to bar the ships from returning to their base.

The UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, expressed concern that the heavy fighting that broke out last week between Georgia and Russia could also spread to another restive Georgian province, Abkhazia.

Moon said he was “profoundly concerned over mounting tensions in the Abkhaz zone”.

UN peacekeeping officials said there were indications the Abkhaz were preparing to launch a military offensive against Georgian special forces in the upper Kodori gorge in northern Abkhazia.

“At this point we are particularly concerned that the conflict appears to be spreading beyond South Ossetia into Abkhazia,” the UN assistant secretary general for peacekeeping, Edmond Mulet, said.

Georgia said that Russia last night landed 4,000 troops by sea on the Black Sea coast of the province, the larger of Georgia’s two breakaway regions.

Pope Benedict called for an immediate halt to the fighting between Russia and Georgia and urged world powers to help find a peaceful solution. He expressed his “profound anguish” that the violence that began on Thursday had “already caused many innocent victims and forced a great number of civilians to leave their homes”.

Russia put the death toll at 2,000 while Georgia has said up to 300 of its people had died, mainly civilians.

“It is my dearest hope that military action will stop immediately and that they will abstain, in the name of their common Christian inheritance, from further clashes and violence,” said the pontiff in his Sunday address.

Most of the population of Georgia belongs to the Eastern Orthodox church. “I invite the international community and the countries with most influence in the current situation to make every effort to support and promote initiatives aimed at finding a peaceful and lasting solution,” the Pope said from northern Italy, where he is on holiday.

America is like a big dirty wolf devouring helpless sheep everywhere

The following article touches on the world crisis from an alternative point of view, relating symbols and things that I do not understand. I’ll defer to my friend Richard Cook to better explain the importance of the following:

I have been in touch with Omna, and his message is profound and sincere. Basically he seems to be saying that we are living in a time when people’s actions from the past are going to catch up with them. It is a message of hope in that the present insanity is not going to last forever and that people who are honest, hard-working, and faithful should move ahead in trying to make a better world. We may go through some rough times, because “God is not mocked.” But these rough times won’t last forever. I would urge readers to take a look at Omna’s website and pick up a copy of his book “Lite in the Heart” when it comes out. He urges us to pray and meditate and live in respect and harmony with the Earth and the Universe. It’s a very positive message and, in my opinion, is perfectly compatible with other spiritual teachings such as the Course in Miracles. Remember too that Jesus drove the money changers out of the temple. Omna has told me that is also his aim and that in our case, the temple is the entirety of Gaia, the Earth.

America’s angst and hubris grow unabated. It is like a big dirty wolf devouring helpless sheep everywhere that George W. Bush turns his stupid grin. But America’s number is coming up. Already you can see it in the financial meltdown that its corporate sharks created with their greed. America is a nation that rose quickly but has been strangled in a few short years by neo-cons, chicken-hawks, liars, perverts, clowns and an emperor who is more naked than a plucked chicken. This chicken is ready for the roast, ready to be slowly turned on a cul-de-sac by a bend in the road at the sixth level of Dante’s inferno. Gaia will have her revenge. (Read more)

“London Pushes World War III”

LaRouche: “London Pushes World War III”

LaRouche Political Action Committee

Over the past 36 hours, a new war has suddenly erupted in Europe. As British expert Jonathan Eyal told the Guardian yesterday, if it is not stopped very soon, it will become the most serious international conflict since the collapse of the Warsaw Pact in 1989-91; far more serious than the Balkan Wars of the 1990s, because of the direct participation of Russia on one side, and likely of Europe and possibly even the US on the other. What Eyal did not say, is that in fact, it will be World War III; World War III triggered by London and its Lisbon Treaty confederates and dupes in Brussels.

After weeks of increasing shelling and rocket attacks on Georgia’s long-standing autonomous enclave of South Ossetia, Georgia President Mikheil Saakashvili made a late-night television address Thursday night, offering an immediate ceasefire and guaranteed full autonomy for the enclave, where the troops of Russia and other neighboring countries have been conducting a UN peacekeeping mission ever since 1992. But then, as Georgia admitted Friday morning, its troops began an invasion to take over the enclave within minutes after the conclusion of Saakashvili’s address. Among many other casualties, the Georgians killed ten of the Russian peacekeepers and wounded about forty.

An emergency meeting of the UN Security Council convened after one o’clock Friday morning on Russia’s insistence, but stalemated when the US, Britain and others gagged at a passage in a short Russian resolution which called on all sides to renounce the use of force.

Friday morning, President Medvedev made a short nationally-televised statement to an emergency meeting of the Russian Security Council. He said that Russia has long been a guarantor of stability in the Caucuses; that Russian troops in South Ossetia were part of a fully-lawful international mission, but that their Georgian fellow-peacekeepers had suddenly treacherously turned on them and killed them. That men, women and children were now dying under Georgian attack in South Ossetia, Russia’s President, under its constitution, is responsible for the safety and dignity of Russian citizens, wherever located. (Most South Ossetians hold Russian citizenship.) Medvedev also made statements, that these killings would be punished, with Prime Minister Putin making similar statements from Beijing.

Russia announced dispatch of troops to reinforce its peacekeepers, and a column of 50-100 tanks entered South Ossetia from Russian North Ossetia on Friday. Ironically, Friday was the same day that Georgia had earlier agreed to, for long-delayed peace talks,– all as part of the deception operation surrounding the invasion.

What now?

As the accompanying article (included below) and Helga’s article make clear [ed- to be posted soon on LPAC.com]: this war is the product of the British and the British-steered Lisbon Treaty gang, who intend to implement Lisbon regardless of the Irish or anyone else. Some people in Europe are thinking: “If Europe gets really united as a military strength, we would really have clout! We could begin to tell Russia where to get off!” As Lyndon LaRouche noted yesterday, “Some people in Europe, under British impetus, are beginning to think like Hitler!”

“This is not just a provocation to get the Russians upset, or to get them into a trap. It’s a drive to dismember Russia. This is essentially,– this is World War III. Look at Cheney, and look at what Cheney represents,– and he’s British, not American, really, in terms of what his policies are,– then you see it! That this is the same thing as the attack on Iran! Exactly the same operation. And we should call it that: `London pushes for World War III.’ And that’s what we should say. `London pushes for World War III.’”

The Hand Of EU Imperialists In Britain’s New Caucasus War

by Helga Zepp-LaRouche

August 8, 2008 (LPAC)–Most European nations were reported by knowledgeable sources to have been well aware of Georgia’s plans to attack South Ossetia, which opened the door to the war now developing on the southern flank of Russia. The Irish defeat of the Lisbon Treaty notwithstanding, ideologues of Britain’s “imperial European Union” plans have been actively working in support of precisely this conflict, as a central element of British efforts to transform Europe into a military camp deployed for confrontation with Russia.

In the June 20, 2008 issue of EIR, Rachel Douglas warned of what was being put in place:

“EU leaders have stepped up their challenges to Russian interests, by asserting their prerogative to act {inside} the former Soviet Union. Lisbon Treaty or no, the apostles of the EU as Empire intend to make it the arbiter of relations in East Central Europe, eclipsing the United Nations in places where the UN, or Russia under a UN mandate, has played a role since the 1990s. The result is an aggravation of tensions that threaten to pull Russia’s southwest border areas, especially the Caucasus region, into a general escalation of warfare across Eurasia,” she wrote.

Under EU Secretary General Javier Solana’s direction, the EU set up a diplomatic group which traveled to the autonomous regions of Transdniestria, in Moldova, and South Ossetia and Abkhazia, in Georgia, and arranged visits to Brussels and London, by leaders they were cultivating from these so-called “unrecognized republics.” In this effort, the EU group has been working closely with Georgia’s fervent “Rose Revolution” leader, President Michael Saakashvili, who himself proclaimed last May: “We are the fighting ground for a new world war.”

Likewise, the Georgian position, reiterated by its representative to the United Nations in the emergency Security Council meeting convened at Russian insistence in the early hours of August 8, is that Georgia offers South Ossetia autonomy, but along “European lines,” with international guarantees. This “European-style autonomy” is the strategy elaborated by the open British agent, Ivan Krastev of Bulgaria’s Centre for Liberal Strategies, who is active in both the Balkans and the Caucasuses.

Krastev proclaims that the “post-modern European order,” which has no nation-states, must inevitably clash with Russia, because Russia “embodies the nostalgia both for the old-European nation-state, and for a European order organized around the balance of power and non-interference in the domestic affairs of other states” (“Russia vs. Europe: The Sovereignty Wars,” Sept. 2007).

Was it, then, a coincidence, that Britain’s Ambassador to Georgia was in South Ossetia on August 6, where he was told by South Ossetia President Eduard Kokoity, that they had irrefutable evidence that the Saakashvili regime in Georgia planned large-scale military action against South Ossetia?

US military trainers not involved in Georgia conflict: military

US military trainers not involved

in Georgia conflict: military

WASHINGTON (AFP) — The Pentagon took a hands off approach to outbreak of hostilities between Russia and Georgia Friday, keeping tabs on US military trainers there and dusting off contingency plans should Americans need to be evacuated, Pentagon officials said.

However, there were no plans to redeploy the estimated 130 US troops and civilian contractors who are stationed in the area around Tblisi, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said. He said all have been accounted for.

“They are not involved in any way in this conflict between the Russian military and the Georgian military,” said Lieutenant Colonel John Dorrian, a spokesman for the US European Command.

The US military has had a longstanding program to train Georgian troops for deployments in Iraq, where there are currently about 2,000 troops, making Georgia the third largest troop contributor to the US-led coalition.

The Georgian government said Friday it wants to bring home 1,000 troops from Iraq, and a US military official said the Pentagon has been asked for help in flying them home.

But otherwise, Pentagon officials said they knew of no other requests for military assistance.

The outbreak of fighting was being watched with concern at the Pentagon.

Whitman said the US Defense Department has been in contact with Georgian officials over the situation in South Ossetia, the breakaway region at the center of the conflict.

“We have forces in Georgia, so obviously the secretary is interested in the situation there,” he said, referring to US Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

“We are watching it closely,” a military official said. “We are looking at the situation, and how it develops. It’s still early.”

The US European Command’s plans and operations center has also been monitoring the situation in South Ossetia, said Dorrian.

“What they do in a situation like this is contact the embassy, contact our troops there, assess the situation, and begin to receive any information or request for support from the embassy, or any reports about US citizens being in danger.”

“At this point we are early in the hostilities. The situation is sort of dynamic at this point,” he said.

Asked about planning for a possible non combatant evacuation, Dorrian said, “We do have robust plans in place to support needs like that if they are required.”

Pentagon officials said such plans would be reviewed as a precaution in light of the situation although no request has been made by the State Department to evacuate civilians.

“Normally plans like this are dusted off and given a fresh look,” said a defense official, who asked not to be identified.

“There is always contingency planning that takes place over a continuous period. When a moment of crisis seems to appear, they are looked at with fresh eyes at that time,” the official said.

The United States, European Union and NATO have led international calls for an immediate end to violence in South Ossetia amid fears of all-out war between Russia and Georgia.

BEYOND CHUTZPAH

BEYOND CHUTZPAH

by Khalid Amayreh
Israel is very much behaving like a whore who urges her town’s folks to erect a great memorial plaque to celebrate and glorify her chastity.

This week, some Zionist pundits both in Israel and North America have urged the Israeli government to boycott the Olympic Games in China to protest that country’s dismal human rights record.

These self-righteous Zionists claimed that a country that rose from the ashes of the holocaust shouldn’t have normal relations with a country that systematically violates human rights and civil liberties.

There is no doubt that China is a prominent violator of human rights (Is the US any better)!!! But the more important question in this context is really whether Israel, a state that has been murdering, enslaving and tormenting another people for the past sixty years, is in a position to lecture or criticize China or any other country on the subject of human rights.

One can argue with little exaggeration that Israel itself is a crime against humanity since its very creation in Palestine in 1948 entailed the extirpation and dispersion of 90% of Palestine’s indigenous inhabitants.

In fact, the systematic ethnic cleansing from Palestine-Israel of non-Jews, who constituted more than 80% of the total population, is still an ongoing process. Moreover, the nearly daily demolition of Palestinian homes in the Negev desert and the West Bank, along with the unceasing theft of Arab land, show that Israel is far worse than China with regard to observance of human rights and the rule of international law.

And while China does indulge in serious violations of human rights, especially in the Tibet region and against certain religious minorities, Israel routinely commits serious war crimes and crimes against humanity against the Palestinians and other peoples of the Middle East.

These crimes include, inter alia, deliberate and calculated murder of innocent civilians, blockading civilian population and denying it access to food and fuel and health care, bombing apartment buildings and crowded streets, vandalizing and ransacking civilian institutions such as orphanages, schools, hospitals and sports facilities and encouraging Nazi-like Jewish settlers to terrorize and murder Palestinian civilians for the purpose of driving them away from their land.

Israel also has been burying nuclear wastes in the vicinity of Arab communities, such as in the southern Hebron region, which is causing a dramatic increase in the occurrence of cancer.

Two years ago, the Israeli air force dropped millions of cluster-bomblets on Lebanon, enough to kill millions of people.

In short, it is really very difficult to imagine a crime that Israel has not committed. True, Israel, unlike China, enjoys the benefit of world-wide hasbara (propaganda) machine extending from Los Angels to Sydney which celebrates Israeli “democracy” and “liberty.” However, the truth, the naked truth, is that Israel remains a murderer, thief and liar.

Israel may very well have been successful in hiding its evil nature from the eyes of many people, especially in the West. However, this evil will eventually corrode Israel from within and bring its demise.

The brazen depravity of Zionist thinking had another morbid expression this week. The Israeli government reportedly protested to Turkey a planed visit to Ankara by Iranian President Ahmadinejad.

Israeli officials have called on Turkish leaders to cancel the visit to protest the Iranian nuclear program and Ahmadinejad’s rejection of Zionism.

Again, the odor of hypocrisy is wafting all over the place.

First of all, Israel has no right to dictate to Turkey, a nation of 75 million people, which foreign statesman to invite and which not to invite. Turkey, after all, is a sovereign state that is mature enough to decide for itself. Turkey will not view favorably any foreign interference in its internal affairs especially if such interference comes from a state that is more sinful than sin itself.

Second, a country that possess hundreds of nuclear heads, many of them are probably directed at Muslim cities in the Middle East, have no right to protest Iran’s nuclear program.

Indeed, if Israel, India, Pakistan, U.S., Russia, China, France Britain and other countries have the right to develop nuclear technology and even nuclear weapons, why can’t Iran, a country that had a prosperous civilization thousands of years before the discovery of America.

Moreover, with such a holier- than- thou attitude, Israel is really not morally fit to protest Ahmadinejad’s anti-Zionist remarks.

Israel today spearheads a worldwide venomous campaign of hatred and incitement against Islam and Muslims. Israeli and Zionist leaders, officials, diplomats, writers and spokespersons routinely incite against nearly one quarter of humanity.

Six decades ago, Nazi leaders in Europe spread the message “kill the Jews, don’t let them take over Europe, don’t let them destroy Christianity, don’t let them destroy mother Germany.”! Today the chorus of hate from Jerusalem to New York to Sydney is spreading a similar message: “Islam is taking over Europe!!, kill the Muslims, kill the terrorists, wipe Islam off from the face of earth.!!”

Just read the hateful Zionist press such as the Jerusalem Post, the New York Post, Commentary, the New Republic, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, the International Herald Tribune, to mention just a few example, and you will see how the “Nazi mind” is still very much alive and kicking 63 years after the demise of the Third Reich.

Today, Israel is waging a dirty war against Islam under the pretext of fighting Hamas and other Palestinian resistance organizations.

Israel is destroying Palestinian schools, closing down Palestinian orphanages, and, probably in collusion with the quisling-like Palestinian Authority, terrorizing Islamic institutions that predated the appearance of Hamas by many decades.

Israel is arresting and torturing young men and women for the pettiest Islamic activity. Israel is really very much like Nazi Germany prior to the outbreak of the Second World War in 1939.

Needless to say, such a state has no right to preach righteousness to the world.

In fact, with such a manifestly diabolical behavior, Israel is not only an abomination upon humanity, it is also a cancer upon the collective conscience of the Jewish people.

The devil’s genius

The devil’s genius

The devil's genius

Once again, ignoring a policy of diplomacy which would lead to peace, we are being led to war

by Soraya SepahpourUlrich
26-Jul-2007

There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to onewho is striking at the root.
- Henry David Thoreau

With censorship abound, we must dodge the bullet of stupor and learn to recognize that Dick Cheney, this Yale drop-out who wore the color of cowardice during the Vietnam War, was chosen to be the devil’s instrument in order to influence George Bush on his destructive path.

While the electronic highways are jammed with petitions to impeach Bush and Cheney, we must not fail to hold to account those who have held our highest office hostage and ax the root of evil. The destructive forces have already made their way into our future and the sparks alone are more threatening that the blaze we are currently engulfed in.

A future determined by the enemies of compassion and humanity. The seeds of damnation have been planted in such places as The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS); a Jerusalem-based think tank which spewed out the likes of David Wurmser, the Middle East adviser to Dick Cheney, Douglas Feith, and Richard Perle, the architects of the Iraq war. They hatched their dastardly schemes among the most ambitious and ruthless of Americans, spreading their lust for hatred, greed, and genocidal wars. Our collective apathy being the weapon they chose to accept for our submission.

Surely it was no coincidence that David Wurmser found himself at the pro-Israel American Enterprise Institute (AEI) where Lynn Cheney, the Vice President’s wife was a senior fellow (and where she also served on board of directors of Lockheed until 2001. Lockheed Martin stocks, not surprisingly, soared as a result of the illegal invasion of Iraq). What good fortune for Wurmser that Lynn’s husband selected him to be his Middle East Security Advisor. Cheney, the man behind the Iraq war, and the power in the White House who with a defeated army seeks further battles as he turns his lust for another massacre towards Iran[1] . What is the prize of this slaughter?

Eliminating Competition
Upon taking office, George W. Bush commissioned the Bakers Institute (Rice University) and the Council on Foreign Relations to study the energy trends and requirements of the 21st century. The comprehensive 99-page report recommended that not only should the administration ease its Iraqi oil-field investment restrictions, but actions and policies should be taken to promote the well-being of the Iraqi people which was being undermined in light of the sanctions and the continuous bombings. Although the report strongly recommended the enlistment of allies in order to phase out the sanctions with “highly focused and enforced sanctions that target the regime’s ability to maintain and acquire weapons of mass destruction” it stated that the hostilities should be stopped.

Furthermore, the joint report favored the Iranian route for the Caspian oil exports which would serve several purposes. In itself, it would translate into a policy shift towards Tehran, and throw Iran as a counter weight to Iraq. The transport of oil through Iran versus the prohibitively expensive longer and costly Baku-Ceyhan pipeline would be pf great benefit to the West, and the world, and help build up the drastically low global spare capacity, according to the report. Another strong contention of the report was that the U.S. ought to move the Caspian region into a zone of cooperation with Russia instead of a zone of competition and confrontation, enabling future cooperation such as jointly countering Islamic militants in the region (Strategic Energy Policy Challenges for the 21st Century, 2001, pp. 38-40,45,) [2]. Of note, the Kazakh officials had been in favor of the Iran route, as well as the U.S. oil companies such as Chevron, Exxon-Mobil and Conoco [3].

There would have been no wars except…
A.Nesdat Pamir delivered a strategy paper in September 2001 which countered the Strategic Energy Policy Challenges for the 21st Century. His paper was entitled “Turkey: The Key to Caspian Oil and Gas”. He woefully cites the Strategic Energy Policy Challenges for the 21st Century paper while in his own strategy paper he argues that since the Persian Gulf is expected to be responsible for almost 80% of the world crude exports between 2000-2020, the control of this oil is of utmost importance; citing a Turkish source, continues: “ given that the price of oil have allowed states to invest heavily in Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), the primary external of this development, both economically and diplomatically, has been Russia” [4]. Russia, therefore, is arming the Middle East with WMD and the 80% oil potential should be rescued. According to him, the lifeline of America would be for it to use the prohibitively expensive Ceyhan –Baku Pipeline [through Turkey and Israel] in order to avoid the anti-American Middle East .

In his paper, Pamir sounds the alarm at the Russian-EU friendship. It is worthwhile reminding the readers that this report was written three months after George W. Bush invited Vladimir Putin to be his guest having “looked deep into his eyes” and trusting Putin. Today, there are missiles pointing towards Russia and Russia is aiming missiles at Europe. Indeed, the devil is a genius; so clever that the report Bush himself had commissioned was tossed aside. War was chosen over peace.

Eleven short days after the illegal U.S. invasion of Iraq, the Israeli National Infrastructures Minister, Joseph Paritzky showed his keen interest in running Iraqi oil from Mosul to Haifa; an idea that had been previously discussed in the 80’s with non other than Donald Rumsfeld. [5] That was just to wet the appetite…

Not only does Israel want to be the transit point for Iraq’s oil, but for the whole Caspian region. According to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (Oct 21, 2005), Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, Israel’s infrastructure minister visited Turkey to discuss a $4 billion, 1,093 project to bring Caspian Sea oil and gas to Turkey’s Mediterranean coast from Azerbaijan via Georgia. The Israeli interest is to see how this pipeline can serve Israeli interests. Alternatives discussed were to transport the oil across Israel from the Mediterranean to the Red Sea, where it would be loaded onto tankers headed for Asia. Another option was to use the 158-mile Eilat-Ashkelon Pipeline to transport the oil from the Mediterranean to the Red Sea. The pipeline build in 1968 during the Shah’s regime was designed to ferry oil in the opposite direction, from east to west. [6]

It would seem that the flow of oil through Israel warrants the dropping of bombs on the region. As IASPS adjunct scholar D.Y. Anaximander said in 2004: “The depths to which we’ve come … now marked by the convergence of terrorist Islam and Western elites (represented at this moment by the Democrat candidate for president of this country) are such that we must be grateful — it is horrifying to say — that we were attacked by Muslims.” [7] But if only oil were the only source of all evils. A more precious and scarce commodity that is causing this butchery is water.

Policy makers in the Middle East are keenly aware of the fact that climate change, population growth and escalating rates of consumption has made water a critical determinant of foreign policy and national security. But none have Israel’s leverage given their strategists and implementers in Washington.

According to BBC online President Mikhail Gorbachev stated that there have been 21 armed disputes over water in recent history – and 18 of them involved Israel. “It’s highlyunfair,” said Yehezkel Lein, a water expert for Israeli human rights group B’tselem, who help to solve water problems in Palestinian areas. “We are talking about mainly the mountain aquifer and the Jordan River system. Regarding the first one Israel exploits approximately 80% of the renewal water resources, and the Palestinians the remaining 20%. Regarding the Jordan River system, the Palestinians do not have any access.” [8] At the rate they are being massacred, Israel will soon have access to 100% of the water. But that is hardly a drop in the sand for Israel’s insatiable thirst.

Israel faced one of its worst droughts in 1990-91. A second more serious drought in 1998, forced it to turn to water rich Turkey. Years earlier, former Turkish President Turgut Ozal had proposed a “peace pipeline” to sell surplus water from the Seyhan and Ceyhan rivers to parched countries in the region; a costly project, with the daunting challenge of requiring cooperation between nations. It was time to call in the troops – American troops.

In a strategy paper entitled “The Geopolitics of Water” (September 2000 – IASPS) penned by Paul Michael Wihbey and Ilan Berman, the following suggestions were made:

“The region contains two sets of countries, each capable of drawing others to follow them, depending on their success. At one pole are the Baathist dictatorships of Syria and Iraq: when the possibility existed, they were aligned with the Soviet Union against the West. At the other pole are the Israeli and Turkish democracies, allies of the U.S. through thick and thin. On the sidelines, Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon have swung to and fro.”

They convince our policy makers in Washington that : “There is little doubt that were Turkey and Israel intent on restoring Lebanon and distributing the area’s water in a rational manner, they would stand a chance of success. A stable strategic grouping capable of deterring the militant Baathist regimes in Syria and Iraq would promote the commencement of large-scale regional water planning and grid systems. Since extensive water planning proposals will necessitate the establishment of pipelines and energy grids stretching across borders, a political and military structure that can ensure the safety and security of the carriers will be the prerequisite to effective water sharing. Already, Turkey and Israel have engaged in serious negotiations starting in May 2000 to import 50 billion cubic meters of fresh water from Turkey using tanker ships. But an effective regional system would require political-military cooperation against Syria”

Contrary to the devils’ predictions, invasion of sovereign Iraq met with resistance. Turkey claims that the Manavgat River basin is secure and that all necessary measures will be taken to guarantee the safety and quality of water up to the loading point, but the pipeline would have to go through Syria. Israel needs troops, American troops in the region to ensure the safe passage of water – and oil.

Our policy makers, possessed, have drowned America’s soul in blood, shame, and infamy. Once again, ignoring a policy of diplomacy which would lead to peace, we are being led to war. We owe it to future generations to redeem ourselves. Not only must Bush and Cheney be impeached, all those who endorse the policy of ‘all options are on the table’ be removed from office, but with awareness and sound values, we must hold to account the hijackers of American policy. “When spiders unite, they can tie down a lion”. (Ethiopian proverb)

Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich has lived and studied in Iran, the UK, France, and the US. She obtained her Bachelors Degree in International Relations from the University of Southern California, Los Angeles. She is currently pursuing her education in Middle East studies and Public Diplomacy. Soraya has done extensive research on US foreign policy towards Iran and Iran’s nuclear program.

[1] Guardian: Cheney pushes Bush to act on Iran

[2] Task Force Report: (pdf)

[3] A. Nesdat Pamir “Turkey: The key to Caspian Oil and Gas”, IASPS September 2001

[4] Elnur Soltan, “Hatemi’nin Rusnya Ziyartei: Soyut Analsmalarin Somut Sonuclari” (Hatemi’s visit to Russia: Concrete Results of Abstract Agreement). Stratejik Analiz. April 2001 [Turkish] pp5-19

[5] Haaretz: Infrastructure Minister Paritzky dreams of Iraqi oil flowing to Haifa

[6] Yigal Schleifer “Isarel and Turkey hope to show that oil, water and business to mix” Jewish Telegraphic Agency New York Oct 21, 2005

[7] IASPS: The Pillar in the Streets: Vietnam-AntiWar (August 30, 2004)

[8] BBC: Water war leaves Palestinians thirsty�

My American World

My American World

The inspiration for this post comes from a telling cartoon: The World’s Worst Nightmare,” by Carlos Latuff .
5-Pillar Scribe
Although we, as Americans, see ourselves as the champions of freedom and democracy; much of the world – the oppressed, impoverished, less fortunate and even those more fortunate than we are (yes, there are people in this world more fortunate than Americans), see us as an opportunistic, ruthless and blood-lusting bully.

As human beings, we have lately progressed into a decline of being civilized. We wear the tin and tarnished badge of pride and arrogance and claim that we surely live the American dream (although many today would argue that we are living a nightmare); not realizing that we do so through the nightmares of others – foreign and domestic.

When asked to take a hard look at ourselves, we make excuses for what we do and are even proud of the blood we shed. We claim to guess at what others think; then destroy them before they have a chance to explain or bring forth the evidence to show how a grave persecution faces their people if Americans fail to believe them. Their pleas go by the way of dripping blood – isolated, sealed and discarded, never to be seen again.

We have built this blood-drenching tradition since the time of creating this country, on the backs of African slaves (many who were Muslim), solely based on their color, as well as the Native Americans – solely based on their color. We no longer use color as the primary reason for annihilation and forced servitude. But let’s not kid ourselves into thinking it’s a tactic we have abandoned when necessary.

We claim to have progressed and now shed even more blood, but not because of color. We’ve reverted back to addressing a more formidable attribute – the label of a select conscience; but not because of conscience, but rather another deadly sin – greed. As horrific as it is, in and of itself, it may actually be an improvement; for we are no longer primarily picking out a mere physical attribute to determine the quality of a human being.

It is, however, still insufficient to kill based on the brand of a belief system, such as Islam; when that very same belief system has practiced throughout history the protection of freedoms that even Americans have taken for granted today. These freedoms are being washed away with the blood-stained rags needed to achieve temporary and unearned riches.

A squeamish and less than frontal or even a flanked attack has already commenced; not only of the desired gratitude of the global community for their own demise, but for the enslavement of especially the innocents of the American citizenry. This has been done while the enemies of humanity hijacked the concept of a people’s government to later make that same citizenry ignorant accomplices to genocide of peoples of conscience. We are talking about hundreds of millions of people who are facing the race to a global war. We minimize it as much as we can by differentiating them by their nationalities, ethnicities, races, political persuasion; but they are amongst the largest of subsets of mankind – they, rather we, are Muslims.

We have marched on, with our star-spangled banner; even against the advice of the majority of sovereign states – a democratic concept rejected by the Champions of Democracy. For the states that have agreed with us, have instantaneously become guilty by association through their greed or by attempts to rise their lowly status by groveling at the chance to somehow be allied with the world’s beacon – the United States. We march on, even against the advice of our religious leaders and legal scholars, who have sought patience and cautioned about the grave moral and legal consequences by moving in haste. We’ve temporarily padded their organizations’ pockets and promised them a degree of increased power in our political marketplace – where the separation of church and state was imposed upon this once-great society because of the potential abuse from those who do believe – how ironic.

Today, as it was back then, it is power that we relish; not realizing that this world is one that that has nations interdependent of each other. We have no problem cutting up whole populations and cutting through cultures and destroying valuable history and infrastructures to satisfy our unjust desires. That sounded too clean. We have torn the limbs, pierced the flesh, murdered women and children, incinerated whole families, mutilated people – dead and alive. We have destroyed them physically; and for those who still live, we work on stripping their fundamental rights, smearing their reputations, controlling their minds and crushing their spirit.

The only difference we see between us and them is that they are not succumbed to our rapidly changing system. We yell and scream in protest and through our far-from-centered talk shows and other media ploys on how “those people” dare whisper to seek or even speak about justice; for they never knew true justice. They should accept the fight for freedom as we proud Americans unjustly and physically address their major cities in shock and awe.

Ours is yet to come. We are next in line, with a relatively bloodless coup by our incorporated government against the true government – We the People. As frogs conjugating in the melting pot with an incrementally-increasing simmer, our own gizzards are being cooked. Our tangible and intangible worth is disappearing – from our rights, our property, our money, our means for transportation, our health-care, our education, our sanity, our dignity, and next to be focused on: our will, our minds and our souls.

How I fear the wrath not only from the world’s populous; not only from how my own children will be perceived from the outside as Americans, and the inside – as Muslims; nothing like I’ve felt so far for the several injustices and infractions I’ve faced over my adopted Islamic name, nor for the wrongful perception of the extent of evil associated with it; but to think of the punishment that faces mankind, including me, when it’s all over.

If it had been your Lord’s will, they all would have believed – all who are on earth. Will you, then, compel the people, against their will, to believe?” [Qur'an 10:99]

War in Afghanistan: a tour of hell

War in Afghanistan: a tour of hell

Last Updated: 12:01am BST 09/08/2008

For all the money, technology and military might America can throw at the Taliban, conditions at the US Army’s most attacked outpost in Afghanistan are reminiscent of the First World War trenches. Report by Stuart Webb

Just after dawn at Forward Operating Base Salerno, the Chinooks, Apaches and Black Hawks are starting their engines. Amid the building roar of the helicopters, the camp comes alive. In this part of eastern Afghanistan, Salerno provides the gateway to a string of isolated American military outposts along the frontier with Pakistan. No one is in a hurry to board the helicopter destined for Combat Outpost Margha. As the ground slips away, the tail-gunner takes up position on the Chinook’s open ramp and the banter between the men evaporates. The soldiers, 18 of them, have a grim resignation about them now.

Combat Outpost Margha
Soldiers from the 173rd Airborne Brigade arrive at Combat Outpost Margha, pockets stuffed with ammunition

Among US forces in Afghanistan, Margha has a formidable reputation, and is the most attacked combat outpost in Paktika province. Located at the top of a mountain on the lawless, porous border between Pakistan and Afghanistan, it is one of the farthest flung and most vulnerable outposts in America’s global war against terrorism.

Once these troops from the 173rd Airborne Brigade are dropped here they are effectively cut off from the outside world. Most are young, in their late teens and early twenties. With every pocket and pouch stuffed with ammunition, and chests crossed with grenade belts, they already look battle-hardened. Some were only 12 years old when the Twin Towers came down in 2001 – a stark reminder of how long the war has been going on.

The mountains seem to go on for ever. Under their gaze have passed some of the greatest warriors and empires in history: from Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan to the British and Soviet armies. These men are just the latest to pass through.

As we skim the ground, the gunners – fingers on triggers – scan the trees and boulders that flash past. The view is beautiful, yet across this frontier the Taliban come and go freely, mounting attacks, resupplying and regenerating. Looking down at the endless landscape, it seems impossible that all the gaps in this border could ever be plugged. Many commanders in both Britain and America accept that the war cannot be won by military means alone. From up here, you can see why. The most powerful military capabilities in the world count for nothing in Paktika. For all the technology, money and might, the young men in this helicopter are at the sharp end of an old-fashioned war.

A puff of white smoke from a signal flare on the ground guides us in. A pyramid-shaped mountain looms into view – nothing but steep sides and sharp ridges. Army engineers have somehow managed to carve a tiny shoulder for a landing spot and the Chinook hovers for some time to line up. We sit uncomfortably, suspended and exposed, while a Black Hawk swirls around to provide cover. Finally, the ramp lowers and the men pile off, the speed of their exit matched by the speed of the 18 men getting on. Hours before our arrival, Margha had been hit by six Taliban-fired rockets. On this occasion, no one had been hurt.

The soldiers head immediately for cover. Margha is looked down on by a series of towering ridges. The main ridge forms the border with Pakistan and it is from here that most of the frequent rocket and mortar attacks come: the soldiers call it Rocket Ridge. The troops at Margha – always men – come under a serious rocket and mortar attack from the Taliban at least once a week. But this is a significant improvement. The base at the top of the hill is the ‘new’ Margha, only a couple of months old – it used to be located down the hill, next to the village from which it takes its name, and was attacked constantly.

Grenade belt
Soldier with a grenade belt across his chest

Specialist Max Dorsa from California is on his first tour and had a miraculous escape at the old camp when a rocket-propelled grenade tore through the back of the guard tower he was in, but failed to explode: ‘I never thought it would be as bad as this,’ he says. Pte Jason Stewart has equally bad memories: ‘We were taking rocket fire every day; they just looked down and shot at us from the hill above. It was insane.’ The position became untenable and Combat Outpost Margha was relocated. It is still perilously exposed but the ridges, while within range, are now just over half a mile away.

It is a situation the Americans have to live with: in Afghanistan, they are trying to put into practice the hard lessons learnt in Iraq. General David Petraeus, the commander in Iraq, has rewritten the American military’s manual on counter-insurgency. Before, the US Army trained to fight wars using overwhelming fire power, but in this unconventional conflict against suicide bombers, hit-and-run attacks and roadside bombs, the old philosophy simply wasn’t working.

Under Petraeus, the emphasis now is less on engaging with guns and more on engaging with diplomacy – of having increased contact with the locals in order to win over hearts and minds. The strategy has been to move out of huge ‘super bases’ and instead install the troops in smaller camps closer to the Afghan people. By showing a highly visible presence and aiding the communities the Americans hope to offer an alternative to supporting the Taliban. But the practice is leaving the Americans more vulnerable than ever.

The platoon commander, 24-year-old Lieut Joe Corsi, tries to build up trust and confidence with the local population by inviting village elders to Margha once a week for a meeting. The local leaders ask for help ranging from drilling wells to power generation, pleas that Corsi will pass on to his commanders at Camp Salerno. In return, Corsi asks if they have seen anything suspicious or any outsiders in their villages.

advertisement

But Corsi is hampered in what he can do – with only 18 soldiers, he cannot allow his men to patrol the vicinity. There are several reconstruction projects ongoing, but the Americans are largely unable to protect them. All Corsi can do is radio headquarters and ask for air support if he hears of an attack. But in such mountainous terrain reports of incidents can take hours to filter through, by which time the Taliban are long gone.

And with military helicopters and jets stretched to the limit on other operations, support is not guaranteed. Margha is resupplied by private contractors using civilian aircraft. Supplies are parachuted into the base by light aircraft or dropped off by a Ukrainian crew using an old Russian helicopter, flying at high altitude to avoid enemy fire.

The ease of the Taliban’s movement leads many of the soldiers at Margha to believe the Pakistani military are at best turning a blind eye, and at worst actively assisting the insurgents. The Pakistan government’s remit has never extended much into its tribal belt along the border with Afghanistan and there is a reluctance to get involved. Pakistan also played a key role in supporting the rise of the Taliban in the 1990s and it is believed that sections of the Pakistani military and intelligence services remain sympathetic.

The relationship between the Pakistani and American military along the border is limited and strained. For Sgt Daniel Cowden it is a frustrating situation. ‘The worst thing is that they can seek refuge in Pakistan; the Pakistan military really don’t do anything so they can come and go real easy. They can fire at us from the ridge and just go straight back into Pakistan.’

A tail-gunner
A tail-gunner on the lookout for insurgents from the ramp of the Chinook

Often, the Taliban shoot from within Pakistan itself. The US soldiers have to get permission from Camp Salerno to return fire across the border – and permission is not guaranteed, in part out of concern that Pakistani civilians could be hit.

The stress of facing repeated bombardment and not being able to fight back makes the soldiers at Margha feel like sitting ducks. Pte Greg Gardiner is in charge of the heavy mortar with which, in theory, they can return fire. ‘We take all these rockets and mortars, then we get our big gun ready and then we just have to stand around,’ he says.

American troops came to Afghanistan after 9/11 with the intention of defeating al-Qa’eda and ousting the Taliban under Operation Enduring Freedom. After initial success, their attention was diverted by Iraq, and the problems of Afghanistan have returned. Warlords and drug barons hold sway over large parts of the country, corruption in government is endemic, and the Taliban have become a resurgent force. The number of insurgent attacks has increased 300 per cent since September 2006.

Western intelligence agencies believe a future terrorist attack on Britain or America is still likely to have its origins in these borderlands. Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential candidate, says he would refocus America’s attention on Afghanistan and take a much tougher line with Pakistan. He has promised extra troops and funding. But more force and more money could merely provide more cannon fodder for the Taliban unless resources are used in a much more targeted and sophisticated way.

Ask the men at Margha about this and they will usually say, ‘Sir, that’s way above my pay grade.’ Some, like 21-year-old sniper Danny Miller, joined up to be part of the ‘war on terror’. ‘A big motivational factor for joining the army was September 11,’ he says, although he does sometimes wonder how much can be achieved at Margha. ‘I’m sure everybody thinks it. Hey, it sucks but you just put it behind you and get the job done.’

Up on the hill, it is a lonely and isolating experience. The outpost is tiny: about half the size of a football pitch. To help protect them from incoming fire, the men live in shipping containers surrounded by earthen blast walls and sandbags. The containers are connected by tunnels of wooden beams and walkways. The scene is reminiscent of the First World War trenches, the claustrophobic feel intensified by the sense of impending attack. Because of the constant threat, the men spend most of their day inside the containers. With summer temperatures topping 50C, conditions can be grim.

The men’s routine is one of constantly revolving guard duty in the camp’s three watchtowers. There are four to a tower, and they sleep in a shipping container underneath. At night they guard in pairs to keep each other awake. The senior NCOs and Corsi work the same 24-hour shift pattern in the radio room. There are no showers or laundry, just wet wipes for washing and ration packs to eat. The time crawls by. The men pass the long hours playing cards and video games, watching DVDs and listening to their iPods, and waiting for the next rocket attack.

Rocket Ridge
One of three guard towers at the Margha outpost. In the background is Rocket Ridge, where most of the rocket and mortar attacks come from

Last month a massed attack by several hundred insurgents on a similar base in Kunar province to the north killed nine US soldiers and injured 15 in one day. The base had to be abandoned. Since the Taliban have regrouped, more of these isolated American camps are at risk of being picked off, though in general the situation remains a bloody, expensive stalemate.

The soldiers will stay at Margha for about a month, when the next Chinook will arrive to take them back to a forward operating base for two days’ break – just enough time to rest, take a shower and do their laundry, before they are sent out to one of the other remote combat outposts for another month of relentless guard duty. The men do 15-month tours in Afghanistan.

Many of the soldiers wear black wristbands bearing the names of friends who have been killed. At Margha it seems that everyone has lost someone close. Corsi wears two wristbands. One is for his good friend Cpl Jacob Lowell, who was travelling in a Humvee when the Taliban fired down from the hills; a bullet went through the roof. Corsi has had extra metal plates welded to the tops of all his Humvees.

The other wristband is for his commanding officer, Major Thomas Bostick. ‘I knew his wife and two daughters,’ Corsi says. ‘He was my mentor. It’s a way to celebrate his life, and it helps me just remember.’ The bands also help Corsi keep perspective. ‘When you start to think selfish thoughts, like how close you are to going home, you just look down at your arm and remember that some people aren’t able to go home.’

The Americans have lost more than 550 military personnel in Afghanistan since 2001. The British and American sectors are among the most dangerous areas to patrol in the country. US forces have the difficult mountain terrain and cross-border insurgents to deal with. The British in Helmand face threats both from an area that is a Taliban heartland and from warlords and drug barons whose fiefdoms thrive in the chaos of war. British military deaths in Afghanistan now stand at more than 100. The great majority of these have come since 2006 when the British moved into Helmand.

Margha’s platoon medic, 22-year-old Specialist Trevor Ramey from Florida, hopes more than anything that his skills won’t be needed again. It is only his first tour, but he is already a veteran. On his very first day in Afghanistan, at an outpost just north of Margha, he had a shocking reality check. He had just disembarked from the helicopter and put down his bags when he was called to treat an Afghan commander. ‘The round traced the top of his skull and exposed his brain. They brought him in and it just blew my mind. I wasn’t prepared for that in any way.’

Ramey’s best friend Juan Restrepo, a fellow medic, was killed during a fire fight in Kunar. They had trained together, shared a room and deployed together. ‘He was going to try and pull back another dead soldier. He took two AK-47 rounds to the neck. He was the only medic on the patrol, he couldn’t tell anyone how to treat him. He died on the Medivac bird. I’m not going to deny it, I cried.’ Ramey has lost five close friends during the tour. ‘That sticks with you. Being here, it changes you.’

Wood-lined corridors at Margha
Wood-lined corridors at Margha connect the shipping containers in which the soldiers live

In the middle of my eight-day visit, I prepare to visit the Afghan border police at the old Margha fort to see how conditions compare down in the valley. Even though it is little over a mile away Corsi’s men cannot leave the base and so cannot provide an escort. While I wait for the police to come and collect me the platoon sniper Danny Miller, 21, is instructed by Corsi to plot the exact range of points along my route so he can provide covering fire if I get into trouble. Miller has already had the Taliban in his sights – and pulled the trigger. ‘It’s unfortunate that it needs to be done,’ he says. ‘To me, when I look through the scope they are an enemy of the United States.’ He explains that the police base is at the limit of his range. ‘I can still hit someone at that range but it won’t be accurate. But in the bazaar [half a mile away], I’ll be able to drop the guy standing next to you.’

Within an hour of my return to the American base a policeman is kidnapped in the bazaar by three armed men and thrown into the boot of a car. In the radio room, Sgt Cowden does not rate his chances. ‘Being a policeman I think they’ll kill him, leave his body by the side of the road as an example not to work with the Americans.’

With the American military fighting simultaneous conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, it is not uncommon for soldiers to be on their third or fourth tour of duty. Such long deployments and the stress of combat are taking a serious toll. The rates for suicide and post-traumatic stress disorder among American soldiers are at record highs. An influential study estimated that one in five American soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan suffers from post-traumatic stress.

Dr Ira Katz, the head of mental health services for Veterans Affairs – a government department that looks after the welfare of US war veterans – estimated recently that there were about 1,000 suicide attempts a month among war veterans, the highest number since records began.

The situation has got so bad that about 20,000 troops serving in Afghanistan and Iraq have been prescribed antidepressants – 17 per cent of those currently serving in Afghanistan, and 12 per cent of those in Iraq. The drugs help the soldiers cope with the unimaginable stress – for an overstretched military, it helps keep them in the field.

Issuing drugs to armies is nothing new. Amphetamines were issued to various German, British, US and Japanese units during the Second World War to keep the men alert; prescribing amphetamines to American forces during Vietnam was widespread. But the wholesale issuing of antidepressants, sleeping pills and anxiety medicine to a military on active operations is a new and pot­entially shocking development. No one at Margha will talk about taking pills. Some feel they can’t in the macho atmosphere of the army; others are worried that by admitting to it they could hurt their chances of promotion.

During their 15-month tour the soldiers get two weeks’ leave. Ramey knows he has been affected by what he has seen – on his last return home his friends and family noticed changes in him, too. He came to Afghanistan in the hope of saving lives, but in the process he may have damaged his own. ‘I guess this place has messed with me, subconsciously,’ he says. ‘My friend slept over at my hotel with his girlfriend one night. I’d been drinking and passed out drunk and they said I was screaming in my sleep. I had a dream I was still here.’

  • Stuart Webb is a journalist for Channel 4 News
  • “The money power preys upon the nation”

    “The money power preys upon the nation

    in times of peace

    and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more

    despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more

    selfish than bureaucracy. I see in the near future a crisis

    approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for

    the safety of my country. Corporations have been enthroned,

    an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money

    power of the country will endeavor to prolong its REIGN by

    working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is

    aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.”

    President Abraham Lincoln after the National Banking Act of 1863 was passed

    (Read Capitalism=Destitution)

    I AM AN AMERICAN

    I AM AN AMERICAN

    By Chuck Baldwin

    It took the global elite a long time to recover, but they have reemerged with a vengeance. They are now on the precipice of accomplishing what their great granddaddies failed to do: bring the “Liberty or Death” colonists under their power and control. Sadly, we no longer have the will to resist servitude. Our pulpits are too busy preaching a prosperity gospel; newsmen are in bed with the forces they once disdained; statesmen have been replaced with opportunistic, self-serving politicians; and merchants know no god but money. Hence, it is left to a small–and I mean very small–remnant to sound the clarion call for freedom and independence. Unfortunately, few seem to be listening to their cries. – Chuck Baldwin


    NewsWithViews.com

    Free republics are not known to have long life expectancies. At the ripe old age of two hundred and thirty-two, America is definitely showing her age. She is long past her prime, and some are predicting her demise. No, some are PLANNING her demise.

    Thomas Jefferson and the other founders of this once-great country believed there was a controlling cabal that was crafting America’s servitude. With the assistance of Heaven, they decided to fight those forces. Pastors fought with fiery sermons from the pulpit; newsmen fought with the power of the pen; statesmen fought in the halls of Congress; and merchants fought with the sacrifice of their material gain. Together, they lifted Lady Liberty to her feet and defeated the powers of darkness.

    It took the global elite a long time to recover, but they have reemerged with a vengeance. They are now on the precipice of accomplishing what their great granddaddies failed to do: bring the “Liberty or Death” colonists under their power and control.

    Sadly, we no longer have the will to resist servitude. Our pulpits are too busy preaching a prosperity gospel; newsmen are in bed with the forces they once disdained; statesmen have been replaced with opportunistic, self-serving politicians; and merchants know no god but money. Hence, it is left to a small–and I mean very small–remnant to sound the clarion call for freedom and independence. Unfortunately, few seem to be listening to their cries.

    2010 seems to be a banner year for these designers of despotism. That is the target year for the implementation of the North American Community, which will commercially unite the United States with Canada and Mexico. The global elite suffered a minor setback when the U.S. Senate failed to pass the Bush/McCain/Kennedy/Graham amnesty-for-illegal-aliens bill. But if you think that John Mccain is going to let that bill lie on the floor of defeat, you don’t understand these people. Should McCain become President, He will do everything he can to implement some kind of amnesty law. Barack Obama will do the same. The reason? It is essential to the designers of despotism that our borders be eliminated.

    Yes, I am saying it: George W. Bush, John McCain, and Barack Obama are part of the global elite that seeks America’s entrance into an international New World Order. In fact, neither Presidential candidate from the two major parties will offer any resistance to this obstinate and oppressive oligarchy.

    Perhaps one day the American people will wake up and realize that they are being led as sheep to the slaughter. I’m just not sure that it will be soon enough, however. 2010 is just around the corner.

    There seems to be only one obstacle standing in the way of the globalists: America’s citizens are the most heavily armed people in the world. That fact must surely stick in the throats of the globalists like a chicken bone.

    Thank God that America’s founders put the Second Amendment in the Constitution. Without America’s deep-rooted commitment to the right of the people to keep and bear arms, we would have been sold into slavery decades ago.

    Without the intellectual understanding of the principles of freedom and the moral resolve to maintain those principles, however, guns, by themselves, will only protect us for so long. In the end, our strength and protection come from God, and not too many people these days seem to be interested in His opinion.

    Lady Liberty is walking very gingerly these days, and the path she treads is laden with traps and quicksand. The globalists have their handpicked puppets positioned to take up where The Three Amigos (George Bush I, Bill Clinton, and George Bush II) have left off. The pieces of the puzzle are almost all in place. 2010 just might be the year that Lady Liberty lowers her torch, folds her arms, and falls fast asleep.

    For what it is worth, however, I pledge no loyalty to this emerging New World Order. Neither will I let Lady Liberty die without a fight. I will say it again: the battle today is not between conservatives and liberals or Republicans and Democrats. It is a battle between Americans and globalists. And, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am an American!
    __________________________
    © 2008 Chuck Baldwin – All Rights Reserved