‘Caucasus crisis prelude to war on Iran’

‘Caucasus crisis prelude to war on Iran’
Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:41:10 GMT

Michel Chossudovsky

Prominent anti-war activist Michel Chossudovsky says the Caucasus conflict is a prelude to a joint attack by the US and Israel on Iran.

According to Chossudovsky, the Canadian economist, the United States had been actively involved in the planning and logistics of the Georgian military operation in South Ossetia.

In mid-July, Georgian and US troops held a joint military exercise dubbed ‘Immediate Response’ involving respectively 1,200 US and 800 Georgian troops.

Shortly after the military drill, Georgian military forces launched a large-scale military offensive against South Ossetia on August 7. Russia, in response, sent its troops into the region.

US warship in the Black Sea

The conflict in South Ossetia resulted in some 1500 civilian deaths, and the displacement of 34,000 others, according to both Russian and Western sources.

Chossudovsky, the forensic Global Research author, said Georgia would never act militarily without the assent of Washington.

“The war on Southern Ossetia was not meant to be won,” he said, adding that, “It was intended to destabilize the region.”

“Let us be under no illusions. This is not a civil war. The attacks are an integral part of the broader Middle East Central Asian war, including US-NATO-Israeli war preparations in relation to Iran,” Chossudovsky cautioned.

According to the Debkafiles, in addition to the Israeli military advisers’ aid to Georgia to carryout the August 7-8 ground assault, Israel supplied Mikheil Saakashvili’s government with Hermes-450 and Skylark unmanned aerial vehicles.

Israeli Hermes-450

Earlier on Wednesday, Russian Duma Deputy Sergei Markov told Press TV that, “this war in South Ossetia is somehow connected with the aggression of Washington against Iran and the possible bombing of Iran.”

“Washington helped Georgia to take control of both South Ossetia and Abkhazia, (because) it needs Georgian territory to use for bombing against Iran,” he added.

Tel Aviv and Washington accuse Iran of developing nuclear arms, and have threatened to launch air strikes against the country.

However, the UN nuclear watchdog has announced that no evidence had been found to support the US and Israel’s allegations against Iran.

Report: 3 Mossad spies killed in Iraq

Report: 3 Mossad spies killed in Iraq
Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:29:27 GMT

Three Mossad agents have been killed in the oil rich city of Kirkuk amid reports that the Israeli spy agency is active in northern Iraq.

The Arab-language Israeli daily al-Arab reported that the three agents were killed on Wednesday in a blast at a building which was guarded by the US security firm Blackwater. According to report, the three agents carried fake Iraqi passports.

Meanwhile, the Iraqi media reported that hundreds of Mossad agents had been deployed to northern Iraq. According to reports, the agents were tasked with the killing of the Iraqi scientists who were involved in the country’s nuclear program under Saddam.

US investigative journalist Seymour Hersh had earlier reported that Israeli agents were based in Iraq’s Kurdistan to gather intelligence on Iran’s nuclear activities. According to Hersh, the agents who were disguised as businessmen had managed to infiltrate into Iran and Syria and install smart espionage gadgets inside the countries.

Israel hoped that the US would resume the activities of the Kirkuk-Haifa pipeline which was constructed during the British rule. Under pressure by Arab countries, the US, however, had to drop the plan.

Asif Ali Zardari: the godfather as president of Pakistan


Asif Ali Zardari: the godfather as president

He may be a pliant partner for the west, but with his record of corruption, Zardari is the worst possible choice for Pakistan

Tariq Ali

September 7, 2008

Asif Ali Zardari – singled out by fate to become Benazir Bhutto’s husband and who, subsequently, did everything he could to prevent himself from being returned to obscurity – is about to become the new President of Pakistan. Oily-mouthed hangers-on, never in short supply in Pakistan, will orchestrate a few celebratory shows and the ready tongues of old cronies (some now appointed ambassadors to western capitals) will speak of how democracy has been enhanced. Zardari’s close circle of friends, with whom he shared the spoils of power the last time around and who have remained loyal, refusing all inducements to turn state’s evidence in the corrruption cases against him, will also be delighted. Small wonder then that definitions of democracy in Pakistan differ from person to person.
There will be no expressions of joy on the streets to mark the transference of power from a moth-eaten general to a worm-eaten politician. The affection felt in some quarters for the Bhutto family is non-transferable. If Benazir were still alive, Zardari would not have been given any official post. She had been considering two other senior politicians for the presidency. Had she been more democratically inclined she would never have treated her political party so scornfully, reducing it to the status of a family heirloom, bequeathed to her son, with her husband as the regent till the boy came of age.

This, and this alone, has aided Zardari’s rise to the top. He was disliked by many of his wife’s closest supporters in the People’s Party (or the Bhutto Family Party, as it is referred to by disaffected members) even when she was alive. They blamed his greed and godfatherish behaviour to explain her fall from power on two previous occasions, which I always thought was slightly unfair. She knew. It was a joint enterprise. She was never one to regard politics alone as the consuming passion of her life and always envied the lifestyle and social behaviour of the very rich. And he was shameless in his endeavours to achieve that status.

Today, he is the second richest person in the country, with estates and bank accounts littered on many continents, including a mansion in Surrey worth several million. Many of Benazir’s inner circle, sidelined by the new boss (Zardari did rub their noses in excrement by having his apolitical sister elected from Larkana, hitherto a pocket borough of the Bhutto family) actively hate him. Benazir’s uncle, Mumtaz Bhutto (head of the clan) has sharply denounced him. Some even encourage the grotesque view that he was in some way responsible for her death. This is foolish. He is only trying to fulfill her legacy. He was certainly charged with ordering the murder of his brother-in-law, Murtaza Bhutto, when Benazir was prime minister, but the case was never tried. Characteristically, one of Zardari’s first acts after his party’s victory in the February polls was to appoint Shoaib Suddle, the senior police officer connected to the Murtaza Bhutto ambush and killing, as the boss of the Federal Intelligence Agency. Loyalty is always repaid in full.

In the country at large, his standing, always low, has sunk still further. The majority of Pakistan’s 190 million citizens may be poor, illiterate or semi-literate, but their instincts are usually sound. An opinion poll carried out by the New America Foundation some months ago revealed Zardari’s approval ratings at a low ebb – less than 14%. These figures confirm the view that he is the worst possible slice of Pakistan’s crumbly nationhood. The people has had no say in his election. parliamentary cabals have already determined the result. I do not take too seriously the recent revelation that a psychiatrist had pronounced him suffering from acute dementia, incapable of recognising his children due to a chronic loss of memory. This was, as is known, designed for the courtroom had he been prosecuted in London or Geneva for large-scale money-laundering and corruption. All that is in abeyance now, since he has been elevated into a crucial figure in the “war on terror”.

A small mystery remained. Why did the US suddenly withdraw support from General Musharraf? An answer was provided on August 26 by Helene Cooper and Mark Mazzetti in the New York Times. The State Department, according to this report, was not in favour of an undignified and hasty departure, but unknown to them a hardcore neocon faction led by Zalmay Khalilzad, the US ambassador to the Security Council, was busy advising Asif Zardari in secret and helping him plan the campaign to oust the general:

“Mr Khalilzad had spoken by telephone with Mr Zardari, the leader of the Pakistan Peoples party, several times a week for the past month until he was confronted about the unauthorised contacts, a senior United States official said, “Can I ask what sort of ‘advice and help’ you are providing?” … Mr. Boucher wrote in an angry email message to Mr Khalilzad. “What sort of channel is this? Governmental, private, personal?” Copies of the message were sent to others at the highest levels of the State Department; the message was provided to the New York Times by an administration official who had received a copy.”

Khalilzad is an inveterate factionalist and a master of intrigue. Having implanted Hamid Karzai in Kabul (with dire results as many in Washington now admit), he had been livid with Musharraf for refusing to give 100% support to his Afghan protege. Khalilzad now saw an opportunity to punish Musharraf and simultaneously try and create a Pakistani equivalent of Karzai.

Zardari fitted the bill. He is perfectly suited to being a total creature of Washington. The Swiss government helpfully decided to release millions of dollars from Zardari’s bank accounts that had, till now, been frozen due to the pending corruption cases. Like his late wife, Zardari, too, is now being laundered, just like the money he made when last in office as minister for investment. This weakness will make him a pliant president of Pakistan.

The majority of the population is deeply hostile to the US/Nato presence in Afghanistan. Almost 80% favour a negotiated settlement and withdrawal of all foreign troops. Three days ago, a team of US commandos entered Pakistan “in search of terrorists” and 20 innocents were killed. Zardari was being tested. But if he permits US troops to enter the frontier province on “search-and-destroy” missions his career will be short-lived and the military will return in some shape or form. The High Command cannot afford to ignore the growing anger within its junior ranks at being forced to kill their own people.

The president of Pakistan was designed in the 1972 constitution as an ornamental figure. Military dictators subverted and altered the constitution to their advantage. Will Zardari revert to his late father-in-law’s constitution or preserve its existing powers?

The country desperately needs a president capable of exercizing some moral authority and serving as the conscience of the country. The banished chief justice, Iftikhar Chaudhry, automatically comes to mind, as do the figures of Imran Khan and IA Rehman (the chairman of the Human Rights Commission), but the governing elite and its self-serving backers in Washington have always been blind to the real needs of this country. They should be careful. The sparks flying across the Afghan border might ignite a fire that is difficult to control.

Tariq Ali’s latest book, The Duel: Pakistan on the Flightpath of American Power, will be published by Simon and Schuster on September 15


:: Article nr. 47027 sent on 07-sep-2008 17:06 ECT
www.uruknet.info?p=47027

Link: www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/07/pakistan.usa

:: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website.

PAKISTAN: Tribal elders warn against incursions by US-led forces


PAKISTAN: Tribal elders warn against incursions

by US-led forces

Sarmad Qazi

Sunday, 7 September, 2008

“ONE more incursion into the Pakistani territory by the US-led occupying forces in Afghanistan and we will retaliate”, a senior member of the Pakistani coalition government said yesterday.

Speaking to Gulf Times during a telephone interview from Islamabad, Munir Khan Orakzai, who is the member of Pakistan’s National Assembly from the tribal Kurram Agency, said: “We (the FATA members) have been promised by the government, including Asif Zardari, that if there is another attack on our land from anyone, we must exercise the right to retaliate.”

Last week, in an unprecedented step, Nato forces launched a land raid in one of the seven Pakistani tribal agencies bordering Afghanistan, killing civilians. Previously air strikes from either the Nato or coalition forces (ISAF) into the Pakistani territory had been registered.

“The government is preparing a letter, that will be sent by the National Security adviser to the Prime Minister, Major Mahmood Ali Durrani, to the American administration soon, detailing our stance,” said Orakzai, who added that he and members of parliament from the FATA are “under tremendous pressure from their constituents who continue to ask why they are being bombarded.”

The 20 parliamentarians from FATA – a bloc headed by Orakzai – refused to vote for Asif Zardari, a day before he was to stand in the presidential election and only after 4-5 hours of talks ‘and promises’ by the Pakistan Peoples Party and other coalition members of the government, did they agree to vote for him. Zardari won the historic presidential election yesterday, claiming 479 votes.
“Once he is sworn in, in couple of days, the first thing that this parliament will do is to debate Pakistan’s policy on this so-called war on terrorism. That’s the first thing this session is going to hear, after Zardari’s address to the parliament,” he explained.

According to him, so far Pakistan’s role in the war on terrorism has been decided by “one dictator”, former president, General (retd) Pervez Musharraf, but “time has come that this is debated in a democratically-elected parliament, followed by chalking out of a new plan.”

“So far this policy of military operations has failed in the FATA. Pashtuns have historically subdued Persians, Greeks, Turks, Mughals, Afghans, Sikhs and British. What makes these new forces think otherwise,” he questioned.
A report in April by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO), the independent, non-partisan investigative arm of Congress, exposed a dangerous strategic failure on the part of the Bush administration to combat and defeat the ‘Al Qaeda network’.

The GAO report also indicated that the US has attempted to address the threat in FATA largely through the Pakistani military, not “recognising that the problems of FATA will not be solved by military means alone.”

The resources allocated remain grossly out of balance as well. The overwhelming majority — 96% — of US spending in the FATA during fiscal years 2002-2007 went to military expenditures. Only 1% of spending — approximately $40mn in USAID money — went to development assistance during this time frame.
“We have also been assured that in the next 4-5 days if the fighting between Sunnis and Shias doesn’t stop in Kurram Agency, the army will be sent to carry out an operation.”

CIA/Mossad Ambitions Behind Bhutto Assassination

CIA/Mossad Ambitions Behind Bhutto Assassination


Date: 2007-12-29, 5:42PM CST

Anglo-American Ambitions behind the Assassination of Benazir Bhutto and the Destabilization of Pakistan

It has been known for months that the Bush-Cheney administration and its allies have been maneuvering to strengthen their political control of Pakistan, paving the way for the expansion and deepening of the “war on terrorism” across the region. The assassination of Benazir Bhutto does not change this agenda. In fact, it simplifies Bush-Cheney’s options.

Seeding chaos with a pretext: “Delivering democracy to the Muslim world” has been the Orwellian rhetoric used to mask Bush-Cheney’s application of pressure and force, its dramatic attempt at reshaping of the Pakistani government (into a joint Bhutto/Sharif-Musharraf) coalition, and backdoor plans for a military intervention. Various American destabilization plans, known for months by officials and analysts, proposed the toppling of Pakistan’s military.

The assassination of Bhutto appears to have been anticipated. There were even reports of “chatter” among US officials about the possible assassinations of either Pervez Musharraf or Benazir Bhutto, well before the actual attempts took place.

As succinctly summarized in Jeremy Page’s article, “Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? The Main Suspects”, the main suspects are 1) “Pakistani and foreign Islamist militants who saw her as a heretic and an American stooge”, and 2) the Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI, a virtual branch of the CIA. Bhutto’s husband Asif Ali Zardari directly accused the ISI of being involved in the October attack.

The assassination of Bhutto has predictably been blamed on “Al-Qaeda”, without mention of fact that Al-Qaeda itself is an Anglo-American military-intelligence operation.

Page’s piece was one of the first to name the man who has now been tagged as the main suspect: Baitullah Mehsud, a purported Taliban militant fighting the Pakistani army out of Waziristan. Conflicting reports link Mehsud to “Al-Qaeda”, the Afghan Taliban, and Mullah Omar (also see here). Other analysis links him to the terrorist A.Q. Khan.

Mehsud’s profile, and the reporting of it, echoes the propaganda treatment of all post-9/11 “terrorists”. This in turn raises familiar questions about Anglo-American intelligence agency propaganda involvement. Is Mehsud connected to the ISI or the CIA? What did the ISI and the CIA know about Mehsud? More importantly, does Mehsud, or the manipulation of the propaganda surrounding him provide Bush-Cheney with a pretext for future aggression in the region?

Classic “war on terrorism” propaganda: While details on the Bhutto assassination continue to unfold, what is clear is that it was a political hit, along the lines of US agent Rafik Harriri in Lebanon. Like the highly suspicious Harriri hit, the Bhutto assassination has been depicted by corporate media as the martyring of a great messenger of western-style “democracy”. Meanwhile, the US government’s ruthless actions behind the scenes have received scant attention.

The December 28, 2007 New York Times coverage of the Bhutto assassination offers the perfect example of mainstream Orwellian media distortion that hides the truth about Bush/Cheney agenda behind blatant propaganda smoke. This piece echoes White House rhetoric proclaiming that Bush’s main objectives are to “bring democracy to the Muslim world” and “force out Islamist militants”.

In fact, the openly criminal Bush-Cheney administration has only supported and promoted the antithesis of democracy: chaos, fascism, and the installation of Anglo-American-friendly puppet regimes.

In fact, the central and consistent geostrategy of Bush-Cheney, and their elite counterparts around the world, is the continued imposition and expansion of the manufactured “war on terrorism”; the continuation of war across the Eurasian subcontinent, with events triggered by false flag operations and manufactured pretexts.

In fact, the main tools used in the “war on terrorism” remain Islamist militants, working on behalf of Anglo-American military intelligence agencies—among them, “Al-Qaeda”, and Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence, the ISI. Mehsud fits this the same profile.

Saving Bush-Cheney’s Pakistan: In an amusing quote from the same New York Times piece, Wendy Chamberlain, former US ambassador to Pakistan (and a central figure behind multinational efforts to build a trans-Afghan pipeline, connected to 9/11), proudly states: “We are a player in the Pakistani political system”.

Not only has the US continued to be a “player”, but one of its top managers for decades.

Each successive Pakistani leader since the early 1990s—Bhutto, Sharif and Musharraf—have bowed to Western interests. The ISI is a virtual branch of the CIA.

While Musharraf has been, and remains, a strongman for Bush-Cheney, questions about his “reliability”, and control—both his regime’s control over the populace and growing popular unrest, and elite control over his regime—have driven Bush-Cheney attempts to force a clumsy (pro-US, Iraq-style) power-sharing government. As noted by Robert Scheer, Bush-Cheney has been playing “Russian roulette” with Musharraf, Bhutto, and Nawaz Sharif—each of whom have been deeply corrupt, willing fronts for the US.

The return of both Bhutto and the other former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has merely been an attempt by the US to hedge its regional power bets.

What exactly were John Negroponte and Condoleeza Rice really setting up the past few months?
Who benefits from Bhutto’s murder?

The “war on terrorism” geostrategy and propaganda milieu, the blueprint that has been used by elite interests since 9/11 to impose a continuing world war, is the clear beneficiary of the Bhutto assassination. Bush/Cheney and their equally complicit pro-war/pro-occupation counterparts in the Democratic Party enthusiastically support the routine use of “terror” pretexts to impose continued war policies.

True to form, fear, “terrorism”, “security” and military force, are once again, the focuses of Washington political rhetoric, and the around-the-clock media barrage.

The 2008 US presidential candidates and their elite campaign advisers, all but a few of whom enthusiastically support the “war on terrorism”, have taken turns pushing their respective versions of “we must stop the terrorists” rhetoric for brain-addled supporters. The candidates whose polls have slipped, led by 9/11 participant and opportunist Rudy Giuliani, and hawkish neoliberal Hillary Clinton, have already benefited from a new round of mass fear.

Musharraf benefits from the removal of a bitter rival, but now must find a way to re-establish order. Musharraf now has an ideal justification to crack down on “terrorists” and impose full martial law, with Bush-Cheney working from the shadows behind Musharraf—and continuing to manipulate or remove his apparatus, if Musharraf proves too unreliable or broken to suit Anglo-American plans.

The likely involvement of the ISI behind the Bhutto hit cannot be overstated. ISI’s role behind every major act of “terrorism” since 9/11 remains the central unspoken truth behind current geopolitical realities. Bhutto, but not Sharif or Musharraf would have threatened the ISI’s agendas.

Bhutto, militant Islam, and the pipelines: Now that she has been martyred, many unflattering historical facts about Benazir Bhutto will be hidden or forgotten.

Bhutto herself was intimately involved in the creation of the very “terror” milieu purportedly responsible for her assassination. Across her political career, she supported militant Islamists, the Taliban, the ISI, and the ambitions of Western governments.

As noted by Michel Chossudovsky in America’s “War on Terrorism”, it was during Bhutto’s second term that Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) and the Taliban rose to prominence, welcomed into Bhutto’s coalition government. It was at that point that ties between the JUI, the Army, and the ISI were established.

While Bhutto’s relationship with both the ISI and the Taliban were marked by turmoil, it is clear that Bhutto, when in power, supported both—and enthusiastically supported Anglo-American interventions.

In his two landmark books, Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia and Jihad: The Rise of Militant Islam in Central Asia, Ahmed Rashid richly details the Bhutto regime’s connections to the ISI, the Taliban, “militant Islam”, multinational oil interests, and Anglo-American officials and intelligence proxies.

In Jihad, Rashid wrote: “Ironically it was not the ISI but Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, the most liberal, secular leader in Pakistan’s recent history, who delivered the coup de grace to a new relationship with Central Asia. Rather than support a wider peace process in Afghanistan that would have opened up a wider peace process in Afghanistan, Bhutto backed the Taliban, in a rash and presumptuous policy to create a new western-oriented trade and pipeline route from Turkmenistan through southern Afghanistan to Pakistan, from which the Taliban would provide security. The ISI soon supported this policy because its Afghan protégé Gulbuddin Hekmatyar had made no headway in capturing Kabul, and the Taliban appeared to be strong enough to do so.”

In Taliban, Rashid provided even more historical detail: “When Bhutto was elected as Prime Minister in 1993, she was keen to open a route to Central Asia. A new proposal emerged backed strongly by the frustrated Pakistani transport and smuggling mafia, the JUI, and Pashtun military and political officials.”

“The Bhutto government fully backed the Taliban, but the ISI remained skeptical of their abilities, convinced that they would remain a useful but peripheral force in the south.”

“The US congress had authorized a covert $20 million budget for the CIA to destabilize Iran, and Tehran accused Washington of funneling some of these funds to the Taliban—a charge that was always denied by Washington. Bhutto sent several emissaries to Washington to urge the US to intervene more publicly on the side of Pakistan and the Taliban.”

Bhutto’s one mistake: she vehemently supported the pipeline proposed by Argentinean oil company Bridas, and opposed the pipeline by Unocal (favored by the US). This contributed to her ouster in 1996, and the return of Nawaz Sharif to power. As noted by Rashid:

“After the dismissal of the Bhutto government in 1996, the newly elected Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, his oil minister Chaudry Nisar Ali Khan, the army and the ISI fully backed Unocal. Pakistan wanted more direct US support for the Taliban and urged Unocal to start construction quickly in order to legitimize the Taliban. Basically the USA and Unocal accepted the ISI’s analysis and aims—that a Taliban victory in Afghanistan would make Unocal’s job much easier and quicken US recognition.”

Her appealing and glamorous pro-Western image notwithstanding, Bhutto’s true record is one of corruption and accommodation.

The “war on terrorism” resparked: Every major Anglo-American geostrategic crime has been preceded by a convenient pretext, orchestrated and carried out by “terror” proxies directly or indirectly connected to US military-intelligence, or manipulated into performing as intelligence assets. The assassination of Benazir Bhutto is simply one more brutal example.

This was Pakistan’s 9/11; Pakistan’s JFK assassination, and its impact will resonate for years.

Contrary to mainstream corporate news reporting, chaos benefits Bush-Cheney’s “war on terrorism”. Calls for “increased worldwide security” will pave the way for a muscular US reaction, US-led force and other forms of “crack down” from Bush-Cheney across the region. In other words, the assassination helps ensure that the US will not only never leave, but also increase its presence.

The Pakistani election, if it takes place at all, is a simpler two-way choice: pro-US Musharraf or pro-US Sharif.

While the success of Bush-Cheney’s 9/11 agenda has met with mixed results, and it has met with a wide array of resistance (“terroristic” as well as political), there is no doubt that the propaganda foundation of the “war on terrorism” has remained firm, unshaken and routinely reinforced.

As for Nawaz Sharif, who now emerges as the sole competitor for Musharraf, he, like Musharraf and Bhutto, is legendary for his accommodation to Anglo-American interests—pipelines, trade, and the continued US military presence. As Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie noted in the book Forbidden Truth, the October 1999 military coup led by Musharraf that originally toppled Sharif’s regime was sparked by animosity between the two camps, as well as “Sharif’s personal corruption and political megalomania”, and “concerns that Sharif was dancing too eagerly to Washington’s tune on Kashmir and Afghanistan”.

In other words, Bush-Cheney wins, no matter which asset winds up on the throne.

Memo to The Lobby’s media tyrants: defamation is not protected speech

by Greg Felton

“The Maclean’s article, and others like it, are examples of [Islamophobia]. By portraying Muslims as all sharing the same negative characteristics, including being a threat to ‘the West’, this explicit expression of Islamophobia further perpetuates and promotes prejudice towards Muslims and others. An extreme illustration of this is a ‘blog’ discussion concerning the article that was brought to the attention of the Commission which, among many things, called for the mass killing, deportation or conversion of Muslim Canadians.”

– Barbara Hall, Chief Commissioner of the Ontario Human Rights Commission


The tyrant, by his nature, exists in a state of war with the society he governs. The interests of the state, the government and the tyrant are collapsed into a singularity, so a challenge to any act of government is deemed to be a threat to tyrant’s authority, and hence the state.

Because the tyrant’s right to rule is illegitimate, it must be maintained by constant application of coercive force. There is no respect for the public good or the rule of law, for that would presuppose the existence of a higher, objective moral and legal authority.

When it suits the tyrant’s purposes, though, he can feign respect for the public good. To discredit political dissent he can recast a protest as a moral attack on everyone, e.g.: “Enemies among us hate our freedoms!” “No group has the right to tell you what to do!” “Don’t listen to conspiracy theories!” “Report suspicious people to the authorities!”

By playing the victim and pandering to public insecurity, legitimate dissent is made to look criminal and the political issue that motivated the protest becomes lost amid the cacophony of moralism and demagoguery.

What holds true for tyrants in general holds true for our media tyrants in particular. Since our media is transparently Zionist and anti-Muslim, the qualities of truth, story, and Israeli self-interest have been collapsed into a journalistic singularity. Any challenge to the integrity or honesty of such a story is a fortiori an attack on Israel; thus, any attempt to hold our media accountable to ethical standards of reporting must be resolutely rubbished lest the challenge engender critical thinking and informed debate.

Thus it came to pass that a human rights case brought against Maclean’s magazine for hatemongering has been drowned out by howls of hypocritical indignation and character assassination. Rather than report on the question of bigotry in the offending article, and give dispassionate analyses of it, tyrants on the Internet and in other media are busy manufacturing sympathy for the writer in question and misrepresenting the challenge as an attack on free speech.

Background
On Oct. 10, 2006, Maclean’s published an article entitled “The Future Belongs to Islam,” written by Mark Steyn. In the article, excerpted from his book America Alone (note the appeal to victimhood) Steyn presents a dystopian future of the Western world overrun by Muslims:

“On the Continent and elsewhere in the West, native populations are aging and fading and being supplanted remorselessly by a young Muslim demographic. Time for the obligatory ‘of courses’: of course, not all Muslims are terrorists — though enough are hot for jihad to provide an impressive support network of mosques from Vienna to Stockholm to Toronto to Seattle. Of course, not all Muslims support terrorists–though enough of them share their basic objectives (the wish to live under Islamic law in Europe and North America) to function wittingly or otherwise as the ‘good cop’ end of an Islamic good cop/bad cop routine. But, at the very minimum, this fast-moving demographic transformation provides a huge comfort zone for the jihad to move around in.”

Steyn’s basis for this conclusion is…well, he doesn’t give one. It is enough for him to depict Muslims as an alien people–hostile, violent, intolerant and a threat to our (gasp!) Western way of life. What weapon will these radicalized Islamic Europeans use to bring about the downfall of life as we know it? Sex–lots of sex. Having children, in Steyn’s logic, is a hostile act of demographic conquest that will engender civil war.

As a result of the article, the Canadian Islamic Congress helped launch a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Commission against Maclean’s for promoting group defamation and hate speech, contrary to Canadian law. In late June, the OHRC decided not to hear the case, because its code does not cover material printed in magazines. Nevertheless, in a rare public statement statement, OHRC’s chief commissioner Barbara Hall made some key observations that effectively supported the charge of hatemongering:

“The Maclean’s article, and others like it, are examples of [Islamophobia]. By portraying Muslims as all sharing the same negative characteristics, including being a threat to ‘the West’, this explicit expression of Islamophobia further perpetuates and promotes prejudice towards Muslims and others. An extreme illustration of this is a ‘blog’ discussion concerning the article that was brought to the attention of the Commission which, among many things, called for the mass killing, deportation or conversion of Muslim Canadians.”

Given this finding, informal though it may be, the plaintiffs are expecting a positive outcome from the more jurisdictionally powerful B.C. Human Rights Tribunal.

Media reaction and inaction
Every journalism student learns that free speech must also be responsible speech. A person may not yell “fire” in a crowded theatre or violate laws against defamation. Hall’s statement was a clear defence of this venerable precept, which Steyn violated in spades.

As expected, Maclean’s issued a statement praising the OHRC’s decision to dismiss the case, but it did so in a way that betrayed its real motives. It added: “No human rights commission, whether at the federal or provincial level, has the mandate or the expertise to monitor, inquire into, or assess the editorial decisions of the nation’s media…We enthusiastically support those parliamentarians who are calling for legislative review of the commissions with regard to speech issues.”

Translation: “We arrogate to ourselves the right to whatever we want and no oversight agency can tell us otherwise.”

This “Maclean’s-as-victim” schtick has become the staple of media coverage, as did vitriolic attacks upon the Human Rights Commission. One might have sympathy for Maclean’s and other media tyrants if they showed as much concern for the free expression rights of those with whom they disagree.

Germany and France, for example, can prosecute anyone who merely dissents from official zionist dogmata about the Nazi holocaust. German-Canadian immigrant Ernst Zundel, who wrote a tract taking issue with the number of Jews killed during World War II, was kidnapped from the United States and illegally sent back to Germany to stand trial for heresy. Today, his name is a term of the worst opprobrium, yet all he did was express an opinion. The B’nai Brith, Canadian Jewish Congress and other zionist agents had no problem deciding to “monitor, inquire into, or assess the editorial decisions” of his work.

The Lobby also went out of its way to vilify Professor Norman Finkelstein of DePaul University for exercising his intellectual freedom. I was even defamed twice in two separate CanWest organs by media tyrant Terry Glavinbecause I chose to exercise my right to free expression at the Vancouver Library.
Much of the emptiness of the zionist free-press argument consists in the fact that news critical of Israel or sympathetic to Muslims is systematically censored.

We don’t read, for example, how settler thugs tied up a Palestinian to a pole and beat him. Front pages aren’t apoplectic over the Israeli security forces’ beating and torture of journalist Mohammed Omer. The fact that Israel tortures 10-year old Palestinian children, and forces 70 percent of Gazans to live below the poverty line is similarly invisible to us, because the right to free speech is itself not free.

When groups like the Canadian Islamic Congress take action against Maclean’s or any other zionist medium, they do so, not to limit free speech, but to ensure that it is not used instrumentally by tyrants.

The ghost of bigotry past
The essence of Steyn’s bigotry is that Muslims are a threat to Europe because of who they are, not what they do:

“The larger forces at play in the developed world that have left Europe too enfeebled to resist its remorseless transformation into Eurabia and that call into question the future of much of the rest of the world… Some European countries will not be living formally under sharia, but—as much as parts of Nigeria—they will have reached an accommodation with their radicalized Islamic compatriots, who like many intolerant types are expert at exploiting the ‘tolerance’ of pluralist societies.”

As you contemplate Steyn’s fearmongering for the fate of European civilization, and disdain for tolerance, I submit this nearly 86-year-old apocalyptic warning for your consideration:

“Internationalization today means only Judaization. We in Germany have come to this: that a 60-million people sees its destiny to lie at the will of a few dozen Jewish bankers. This was possible only because our civilization had first been Judaized. The undermining of the German conception of personality by catchwords had begun long before. Ideas such as ‘Democracy,’ ‘Majority,’ ‘Conscience of the World,’ ‘World Solidarity,’ ‘World Peace,’ ‘Internationality of Art,’ etc., disintegrate our race-consciousness, breed cowardice, and so today we are bound to say that the simple Turk is more man than we are. No salvation is possible until the bearer of disunion, the Jew, has been rendered powerless to harm.”
(Adolf Hitler, Munich, Sept. 11, 1922).

Small wonder that Muslims have become the new Jews of Europe, but you won’t find this point of view discussed in the media. The Lobby ensures that some types of expression are freer than others.

US lenders ‘face state takeover’

Home repossessed in US

US mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are set to be put under government control in an attempt to rescue the firms, media reports say.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson will outline government plans at a news conference at 1100 (1600 BST).

The move to shore up the shareholder-owned firms, which hold or guarantee half the US mortgage debt, would be the US’s largest ever financial bail-out.

In July, Congress approved a plan aimed at offering them more liquidity.

This followed huge losses by the two firms as result of a big increase in defaults and repossessions in the US housing market.

‘Management told’

On Saturday, a senior politician, Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson had told him the government would use its powers to ensure the continued and stable functioning of the companies.

The Washington Post, quoting senior administration sources, said the firms would be put under a legal status known as “conservatorship” which would greatly reduce the value of the two companies’ common stock.

Other securities – including company debt and preferred shares – would be guaranteed by the government, the paper added.

The New York Times reported that senior executives at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were informed about the plan on Friday.

The Wall Street Journal said it would include changes in the top management.

There would also be quarterly infusions of cash to keep both firms afloat, the papers say. The total cost to taxpayers is not known but could amount to billions of dollars, they add.

The BBC’s Business Editor Robert Peston said the government was being forced to step in because it was dangerous for the US economy for doubts to persist about the two firms’ viability.

Struggling homeowners

The two contenders for the US presidency, Barack Obama and John McCain, have been briefed on the takeover by Mr Paulson.

“We’ve got to keep people in their homes,” said the Republican candidate, John McCain.

“There’s got to be restructuring, there’s got to be reorganisation, and there’s got to be some confidence that we’ve stopped this downward spiral,” he added, saying that the takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac must not benefit executives at the two companies.

The Democratic Party candidate, Barack Obama, said any action should be focused “on whether it will strengthen our economy and help struggling homeowners”.

“We must not allow government intervention to protect investors and speculators who relied on the government to reap massive profits,” he said, adding “we must protect taxpayers, not bail out the shareholders and management of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac”.

Fragile

On Friday, America’s Mortgage Bankers Association reported that at the end of June, about four million homeowners with a mortgage – representing a record 9% – either were behind in their payments or faced repossession.

In the past year, the financial crisis has taken a heavy toll on both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The country’s two largest buyers and backers of mortgages lost a combined $3.1bn between April and June.

Both companies say they have the resources to weather the losses, but their shares have fallen sharply on fears that they could go bankrupt as borrowers default.

The rescue plan passed by Congress in July gave the US government the authority to buy shares and offer liquidity to companies to keep them afloat.

Many analysts believe their collapse would be a major shock to the already fragile global financial system.

Together, the two firms own or guarantee about $5.3 trillion worth of home loans – about half the outstanding mortgages in the US.

That is about 25 times as big as the obligations of Northern Rock – which was nationalised by the UK government earlier this year, and twice the size of the UK economy.

MSRA members sue Zionist NGO DAIA

MSRA members sue Zionist NGO DAIA

TEHRAN, Sept. 6 (MNA) — Members of the Argentine Second Republic Movement (MSRA — Movimiento por la Segunda República Argentina) are suing the Delegation of Israeli Associations in Argentina (DAIA).

MSRA Press Communiqué No. 50 (www.m2ra.com) was issued on August 29, 2008 to explain their position.

Following are excerpts of the text of the press communiqué:

We fight those who wish to silence all public debate on Zionism, a key political issue for Argentina and of global consequence.

Why we sued the Zionist NGO DAIA:

Adrian Salbuchi, Juan Gabriel Labaké and Enrique Romero filed a criminal lawsuit alleging calumny and slander against the top officers of the DAIA, in respect of the contents of their “Report on Anti-Semitism in Argentina – 2006” prepared by the Centro de Estudios Sociales (CES – Social Studies Center), belonging to the DAIA (Delegación de Asociaciones Israelitas Argentinas – Delegation of Israeli Associations in Argentina). Our lawsuit was filed with District Court No. 13, Secretariat No. 80 in Buenos Aires, Argentina, provisionally presided over by the Honorable Judge Dr. Raúl Juan García.

In their report, the undersigned are insulted and slandered by the above, as they accuse us of “virulent anti-Semitism” because of our global and national geopolitical analyses published as press communiqués of our group, MSRA and as reports in the “El Traductor Gráfico” bulletin. “Anti-Semitism” constitutes a crime of discrimination under the Argentine Discrimination Act, Law No 23.592 (i.e., Art. 3º defines “discrimination against persons or groups on account of their religious beliefs”).

Adding insult to injury, the CES gave their report ample local and international publicity through diverse channels and the media, also translating it fully into English, and authorizing its publication on the Internet by the powerful U.S.-based Zionist organization, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a militant Zionist organization founded and operated by the Jewish Masonic lodge B’nai B’rith, whose top officers recently met with Argentine President Cristina Kirchner and Foreign Secretary Jorge Taiana in Buenos Aires and told them to be more outspoken against so-called “anti-Semitism” in Argentina. In addition, the “Reports on Anti-Semitism” issued every year by the CES/DAIA are used as an official source of information on our country by the U.S. State Department. All of this and other actions on their part have caused the plaintiffs severe moral, professional and economic damage and injury.

As we explain in our lawsuit against DAIA and CES officers, our analyses and criticisms are aimed solely at the official policies of Israel and Zionism as a political ideology that supports, promotes, and defends the interests of that foreign power throughout the world. We solely focus on highlighting the grossly inhuman nature of those policies that breach basic human rights, their expansionist plans in the Middle East and their illegitimate interference in the internal affairs and policies of the Argentine state. All of this forms part of our work and efforts (as politicians, journalists and international social analysts), to promote greater public awareness in Argentina of the concrete risks that our country runs, if we allow the United States, Israel and Zionist lobbies and pressure groups to move forward with what increasingly appears to be a well-orchestrated campaign over the Argentine Republic, its territory, foreign policy, natural resources, national unity and social peace.

The undue pressure… exerted by Zionist organizations over global and domestic public opinion tends to misinform and distort reality in these key issues, which also puts at risk the very welfare and physical integrity of Argentina’s large Jewish community that for the most part wishes to live in peace and harmony, as it always has, by unjustly tarnishing them with the violence emanating from and promoted by the terrorist (entity) of Israel and its unconditional ally in the Middle East, the United States of America.

We stress that using their enormous financial, media, diplomatic and political resources at their service, internationally and domestically, these and other Zionist organizations, lobbies and other (directly or indirectly) pro-Zionist entities attempt to silence any criticism and balanced analyses of these fundamental political issues. Zionist activities in different parts of the world today threaten to drag all of mankind towards new and increasingly violent wars in the Middle East and elsewhere. Not satisfied with having unleashed genocidal destruction upon the nations of Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan, they now target (the) next victims for unilateral military aggression… and they clearly also have in mind the so-called Triple Border Areas (where the Argentine, Paraguayan and Brazilian borders meet), and where not surprisingly huge fresh water resources lie (attacking this region was already announced in September 2001 by former top Pentagon Zionist government officer Douglas Feith, tacitly supported by his bosses Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld and George W. Bush).

In presenting our lawsuit, we asked the Court, amongst other things, to not only sentence the accused regarding the calumnies and slander perpetrated against us but, more importantly, to clearly define that criticism against the official policies of the United States and Israel, and the ideological premises of Zionism in no way constitute acts of “anti-Semitism” or “anti-Judaism”, nor crimes of discrimination of any sort whatsoever. We also ask that the Court clearly establish as legal precedent the conceptual differences that clearly exist between the terms “Anti-Semitism”, “Anti-Zionism” and “Anti-Judaism”.

We further point out that the ways in which every manner of distortion is unleashed upon this complex subject regarding these and other relevant terms nowadays constitute clear examples of psychological warfare, often assuming the marks of veritable intellectual terrorism, in that those who perpetrate them try to silence all manner of serious, balanced and fair public debate on such fundamental political matters. In short, to any person of goodwill, as well as for all dictionaries of Western languages, we have that:

Judaism is a millenarian religion. The Jewish ethnic group is a millenarian social group dispersed amongst many countries of the world, whose members have specific cultural, social and religious characteristics, but who nevertheless differ — often very acutely — in their ideological and political stances and opinions. Zionism is a nationalist and fundamentalist political ideology founded in the late 19th century that today has grown and integrated into a very powerful global network of pressure groups, lobbies and organizations of different kinds, totally aligned with the interests and objectives of Israel. Amongst the main organizations forming part of this global network, we find: AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), the American Jewish Congress, the ADL (Anti-Defamation League), the AJC (American Jewish Committee), the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, and the ZOA (Zionist Organization of America) (all based in the United States); the World Jewish Congress, World Jewish Committee, World Zionist Organization, Jewish Agency, and B’nai B’rith (all of which are multinational entities); and the AMIA (Asociación Mutual Israelita Argentina), DAIA (Delegación de Asociaciones Israelitas Argentinas) and OSA (Organización Sionista Argentina) (all based in Argentina). Israel is a national political entity created in 1948, established in a specific geographic location.

Naturally, all our analyses and critiques — which are consistent, balanced, well-documented and referenced — are centered on the latter two.

Adrian Salbuchi

Enrique Romero

Juan Gabriel Labaké

THE NEOCON FASCIST WARMONGERS HAVE GONE TOO FAR

THE NEOCON FASCIST WARMONGERS HAVE GONE TOO FAR

By Guy S. Razer, LtCol, USAF (Ret)

I am a member of an honorable family that has been split into pieces because of the lies that have been perpetrated against us in the name of our great nation. I served in the military for 20 years, ending abruptly when I determined it was no longer possible to continue after what I saw happen on 911. Almost immediately, I knew there was something horribly wrong with the officially advertised story as to the events of that truly horrific day!

My son is now a Marine that serves with the same trust and honor that I had when I initially entered the US Air Force in 1982. He is to be stationed in Afghanistan soon and I am at significant odds with my feelings. I appreciate his desire to serve his country and his depth of courage and faith in so doing. The thing I am at odds about has nothing to do with our family, but those that are making the decisions that put members of my family in harms way!

Their lies, deceit, and unlawfulness have only been surpassed by their arrogance and outright desire to instigate chaos in the continuing illegal and unprovoked attacks upon other sovereign nations. And they are not finished! They intend perpetual and innocuous take over of everything and everyone we hold dear, and they will not stop until they are stopped. In war they find profit and control, so they desire no end to hostilities, but instead create them in any part of the world they deem necessary to fulfill their self aggrandizement.

The events of 911 cauterized the American public into solidified support of their trusted leadership to pursue retribution for the mass murder of American citizens on our own soil. 911 was the pretext for wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq. We were told there were direct connections between the perpetrators of the crime and attacking them would not only allow justice to be served, but would also provide the safety and protection that our leadership took an oath of office to provide.

We were told Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that the only way to avoid the smoking gun of a mushroom cloud from a nuclear attack on our cities was to attack them and remove the threat. We are now fed the same lie about Iran, even though our $40 billion a year intelligence apparatus tells the exact opposite story. We have military drills, most recently Immediate Response 2008 in Georgia, that turn into offensive military actions which are then blamed on others to instigate death and hatred where it did not previously exist.

In short the current leadership of our nation (am I am not distinguishing between political parties for that is trivial in this comparison), and those who control and manipulate them from behind the scenes, are guilty of the highest crimes imaginable under the Constitution of The United States of America. They have violated the trust of the American people and in fact used that trust as a tool of manipulation to instill a quasi-patriotic and offensive aggression mentality. In so doing they put honorable men and women warriors in harms way without care or regard for their well being or basic protection.

Treason is the most accurate definition of their crime! Mass murder of innocent people is the result. Their future goals include the destruction of the moral fiber known as care. There are those among us, however, who care way too deeply to allow this to happen! May our Truth filled spirit live on and stand tall in humble, yet bold strength of mutual character!

<SIGNED> Guy S. Razer, LtCol, USAF (Ret.)

Israel Has US Proxy to Bomb Iran; Scheme Failing; Look Out Sudan!

Israel Has US Proxy to Bomb Iran; Scheme Failing; Look Out Sudan!

Charles E. Carlson Jul 18, 2008

Washington’s war voices are strangely muted about Israel‘s much practiced Iran raid. Israel is always ready, and per capita, possesses the world’s largest and most powerful military. The only question is, who is next and how big the bombs will be.

A look at the globe reveals the USA will necessarily be part of any raid (if we Americans allow it) simply because Israel cannot get to Iraq and back without flying over and refueling in Iraq. The USA controls Iraq and its puppet government, but fueling is an act of war and will invite reprisals against every American. Our administration is silent about the pending raid. The US, having given its attack proxy to Israel, must pretend to be an innocent spectator until Israel launches the attack. Will it?

Much light is cast on the scheme to bomb Iran in a July 11 story carried in London and Jerusalem. It stated that the USA had allowed Israel the use of our airbases in Iraq and the airspace over Iraq for a dress rehearsal bombing raid on Iran. This is an underhanded act of war by the USA against both Iran and the Iraqi people, so it has been ignored by the US and denied by Israel.

All logic suggests the report is factual because both publications that carried the story went to unusual and dishonest ends to re-plaster the news. The original: “Crude Oil Rises to Record on Speculation Israel May Attack Iran, By Alexander Kwiatkowski, Bloomberg’s London correspondent, stated:

“Oil rallied to a record high of $146.90 a barrel in New York after the Jerusalem Post said Israeli war planes practiced over Iraq, adding to speculation the country is preparing to attack Iran.

“Israeli war planes are conducting maneuvers in Iraqi airspace and using U.S. airbases in the country, possibly practicing for a strike against Iran, the newspaper reported, citing comments by Iraqi officials in local media. Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev denied the report,” and: “Iran, OPEC’s second biggest producer, this week tested missiles capable of reaching Israel.” (3) Bloomberrg

Within an hour Alexander Kwiatkowski‘s story was bumped off the homepage at Bloomberg and replaced with a much milder version, Oil, Gasoline, Rise to Records on Middle East Violence Concern, by Mark Shenk, which played down the connection between oil prices and pending war:

The Jerusalem Post also switched articles; the original story hit the street: Israeli warplanes practice in Iraq; this one quickly disappeared completely and was replaced with, Iraq denies IAF using its airspace,

Which stated in part:

“Iraq denied on Friday reports claiming the Israeli Air Force has been practicing for a possible attack against Iran in its airspace.”

“As the Ministry of Defense, we haven’t observed any IAF warplanes practicing in Iraqi airspace,” said Major-General Mohammad al-Askari, spokesman for the Iraqi Defense Ministry.”

On Friday, sources in the Iraqi Defense Ministry told a local news network that Israel Air Force (IAF) war planes are practicing in Iraqi airspace and land on US airbases in the country as a preparation for a potential strike on Iran.”

The IDF denied the reports, calling them “baseless.”

The report, which was also carried by Iranian news outlets, claimed that recently massive IAF overnight presence was detected in several American held airbases.

According land on a runway near the city of Hadita. The sources estimated the jets were to the sources, former military officers in the Anbar province said IAF jets arrive during the night from Jordanian airspace, enter Iraq’s airspace and practicing for a raid on Iran’s nuclear sites.

The sources also said US bases in Iraq might serve as a platform for the IAF from which to attack Iran. If Israeli warplanes were to take off from Iraq, they could reach Bushehr in five minutes – a “record time,” the sources said.” (6)

The denial by the Iraqi general sounds like something written by the White House press secretary, conveniently limited to what he did not see.

Many Americans are not fooled. Public opinion is collapsing for anything the Congress or the Administration does. Most heartening is the seeming change going on within the Christian Right, that is showing signs of abandoning Zionist quack-Christianity. Confidence in the Administration with its overt passion for war, the new Democrat Congress, and the Christian Right’s Republicans at any price party politics are all crumbling.

Never has there been a conspiracy with a higher cost for the American people than the scheme that would loose Israel to bomb Iran. The price of oil pierced $100 in March and kept going. Serious oil insiders realized our leaders really intended to hit Iran by reading between the lines, as I did. Every oil consumer mogul who could afford to stockpiled oil in preparation for this attack, driving the price to over $145.00 (now about $130.00) per barrel.

The only time oil takes a dip is when there appears to be a chance of peace. Right now oil is on a big dip, another glimmer of hope. When Israel freshens up its threat the price of oil goes higher! If Israel does not bomb Iran, oil prices will come down below $100.00 per barrel and maybe much lower. Oil prices, may be our best barometer of war and peace. (3)

More consumer costs of serial war:

* Food prices are still accelerating and cannot come down, or will even go into orbit, so long as the congressional created “Ethanol Con” is being subsidized to burn corn. There is no longer a food surplus (1)

*The Pharmaceutical industry has been given the key to medical care. As anyone can see from the serial ads on prime time TV, the drug companies have all the money they can burn; consumers pay.

* Congress now will compete with the Federal Reserve for who can print more money faster and is destroying any purchasing power we may have left in our savings accounts. Debt of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will now be privately owned giants with consumer funding. They were correctly deemed “insolvent” by former Federal Reserve President William Poole, but their trillions of debt is to be guaranteed by consumers.

These and other trillions of dollars of big corporate subsidies will ultimately destroy any value our savings may have had. Every one of the monumental problems is tied to our penchant for serial wars that promises the ultimate collapse and disgrace of the dollar.

Russia just signed a huge oil deal with Iran, according to UK sources. European press tells us the Administration has been quietly strong-arming oil companies and banks to forego doing business with Iran…unwritten sanctions. Under this pressure the French giant, Total Petroleum, backed out on a negotiated contract to develop a major oil and gas field in Iran last week. But no sooner was France out than Russia rushed in, signing an overnight contract to develop one of the biggest gas fields in the world. More oil we will not see! Again, Americans will pay the cost for our leaders’ war based economy, which is wheezing and staggering along toward its own destruction.

What are the chances that we who oppose it may interrupt the cycles of war by trumping the bombing of Iran? Quite good. We who have tried in any way should pat ourselves on the back, for this war is already a year behind schedule.

We are not the first war-based economy

To make any sense of this, one must understand and accept that warring is the committed way of keeping our economy afloat. We are the Great Britain of 130 years ago. It acquired resources with guns to keep its economy purring. But Warmaking businessmen, including Cecil Rhodes, got too much control and began to campaign for conquest of nations that went beyond economic spoils.

England attacked Sudan and South Africa in back-to-back invasions. Both ended in the inhuman treatment of natives, and both wars were unsound economically. Great Britain became not so great because it invaded countries just because it could. It is no exaggeration to say Great Britain’s 1885 war on Khartoum (Sudan) was sold to the British people out of vengeance for the death of one man. Sudan had nothing Great Britain could use, except cotton land, and they could have purchased that. In this respect it is much like our avenging the Day911 Afghanistan adventure. Ten years later the Boor Wars were fought for British-Colonial pride. South Africa had gold, but Great Britain did not get the gold by conquest.

Both wars were outrageous slaughters, the first of on all black society, and the latter by deliberate starvation of 25,000 white women and children in British concentration camps. It was Great Britain’s version of Abu Ghraib in South Africa, and it destroyed what little reputation for decency the British Empire may have had. These serial wars ruptured the British treasury and turned its people against war. The result was the destruction of the gold-backed Pound Sterling, leaving the USA the surviving world power with a gold-backed dollar.

We have now repeated Great Britain’s folly ten times worse. Our government and the Federal Reserve’s errors are so obvious that their mistakes can only be deliberate. War is synonymous with deficit spending. Our federal debt limits are now over $9 thousand billions.

America’s warmaking leaders are serializing successive wars against Islamic Nations for no other reason than that they can get away with it. It is true, there is oil in Iran and Sudan just as in Iraq, but we could get our share of their oil without destroying these countries and annihilating their people, and destroying our own economy in the process. There is no oil in Afghanistan, so just who can tell us why we are there? Bill Clinton said it best in a different circomstance. He said, “I did it because I could.”

The answer is the same for Lord H. H. Kitchener, who commanded the British in both wars, and the Bush-Clinton-Bush dynasty’s whose unspoken excuse is war is, its good for the economy as long as they could make it happen.

How much will it cost us if Israel’s bombing adventure results in closing down shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, or destroys pipelines in Iraq? If Iran survives the bombing and is not nuked, as some especially at the pulpits of Christian Zionist churches desire, it may be with the help of China or Russia. They will do everything in their power to make sure we do not get even a sniff of its oil and gas. Americans will pay the price.

“Bring them on,” was George W. Bush grat line about oil rich Iraq before we shut down their oil industry for five years. Bring them on is how we have $4.00 gas. We cannot even imagine how crippling six or eight dollar gasoline would be to our weakened and shaking economy. Europeans may be used to this price, but we are not…we drive.

Our own politicians and press are ignoring Israel’s plans to bomb Iran. They seem to be all but forbidden to connect high oil prices to the war. We are not supposed to notice that gas was one dollar a gallon before the first attack on Iraq, and two dollars before the attack on Afghanistan, three dollars after the second attack on Iraq, and headed for the stratosphere if Israel attacks Iran. Why, because every war disrupts the oil supply.

The rest of the world knows full well that Israel gets its power from Washington. My opinion: Israel will not attack Iran without the green light from our leaders. I see optimistic signs that our government is being forced to reconsider its red hot war escalation plan. With poll ratings like we see, even Mr. Bush has to think twice about helping Israel to destroy Iran.

The Christian Right is also showing signs of abandoning the Zionist quack leaders like John Hagee, and Rod Parsley who says our Founders called for eradicating the Muslims. The polls also tell us they are no longer supporting the warring Bush Administration or his perceived policy clone, John McCain.

Five years ago, the Pew foundation funded a foundational poll on Religions and Public Life and concluded in part that “American evangelical Protestants” constitute 26% of the American population (we think it is more) and that they gave George W. Bush 40% of his total votes in the 2004 election. Recent polls by Pew and other groups indicate President Bush has less then 17% approval rating and that Congress is even lower esteemed, clearly indicating that even the Christian Right has at least partly turned against his policies of war. (5) Poll

Conclusions:

Israel is the USA pit bull, ready to attack. Washington is faltering under pressure from you, the public. Keep it up! War is less likely today than a week ago or a year ago! This means someone is having an impact, maybe it’s us?

If this is so, we can expect the administration to shift its propaganda machine to Sudan and go into neutral pending the election. They will not change policy, only their tactics will change. Sudan is an obvious war target being fanned to a blaze. It is Muslim, all black, and has oil! It has been on the back burner under a ruthless 10-year propaganda attack that is 90% false, but has fooled just about everyone, especially the Christian Right who want to believe Muslims hate them.

Unlike Great Britain’s attack on Sudan 140 years ago, our leaders think they have something to gain there. Sudan has the biggest new undeveloped oil reserve in the Middle East, only beginning to be produced, and like Iran, they kicked out big oil companies in the 1970s.

I think we are gaining ground primarily because the logic of Jesus’ Christianity is beginning to get through to the followers of the Zionist Christian-quacks. We must keep on until the lame duck administration is safely out of the White House, and then start anew on the new one.

Give yourself a tentative high five. We think this is part of The Great Turning From the Age of Serial Wars that we wrote about five years ago.

“Americans are not only turning away from war and they will soon turn from those who make war. And we are beginning to look for those whom we should blame. This turning about is at first ponderous, like that of an ocean-going liner. But once started, it will be unstoppable. Gathering momentum, it will crash through anything in its path, even icebergs of ignorance. The strange and diverse anti-war movement is only a symptom of awakening of a much greater slumbering mass of human energy soon to be brought to bear.” (7) Turning

The next task for the peacemakers, after Iran, will be to prevent the invasion of Sudan. The US will use much different tactics. It will try to sell us on a humanitarian effort to save the starving people of Sudan…with a gun. But it’s all about oil. The new Obama administration may well fall for it; you must not. If the few who care can stop the occupation of Sudan and the attack on Iran back-to-back we may get a little of our country back.

Endnotes:

(1) The Great Biofuels Con

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/07/12/eabio112.xml&page=1

(2) Fannie Mae, Freddie Debt a Buy Poole Says `Insolvent’

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&sid=at1sRK3sYpgM&refer=home

(3) Crude Oil Rises to Record on Speculation Israel May Attack Iran http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aZkEmveQew70&refer=home#

(4)Iran and Russia sign major oil deal

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1215330962516&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

(5) Bush, Congress get record lows in AP

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080715/ap_on_go_pr_wh/ap_poll_bush_congress

(6 ) Iraq denies IAF using its airspace (http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1215330937574&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull)

(7) The Great Turning, Ending Our Age of Serial Wars
C.E. Carlson Mar 18, 2003
http://whtt.org/index.php?news=2&id=136

Will Israel soon disappear?

Will Israel soon disappear?

Cherifa Sirry’s blog

Well, I never thought I’d have anything in common with Israelis… but according to this article and Israeli polls, we all seem to agree that little time is left before Israel is History.  What a blessing.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Security/Default.aspx?id=236742

Will Israel soon disappear?

Chad Groening – OneNewsNow – 9/3/2008 10:45:00 AM

Leaders of a pro-Jewish movement within Israel’s Likud Party believe that, thanks to a lack of leadership, Israel no longer has the aura of invincibility it once had.

And things have gotten so bad in Israel that a majority of Israelis now believe the Jewish state will not even exist in the next two-to-three decades. Recently, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert announced that he wants to release 200 more Islamic terrorists, including “those with blood on their hands” in order to appease Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas.
Rob Muchnick
Manhigut Yehudit, or the Jewish Leadership Movement of Likud, is strongly opposed to the continued appeasement of Israel’s enemies. U.S. director Rob Muchnick says this sort of appeasement never happened in Israel’s past.

“What Israel used to be known for is its daring and its wildly, spectacularly successful military and the strength of its military. Right now you have the majority of Israelis think[ing] the country won’t exist in 20-to-30 years,” Muchnick contends. “In what other country would they even take such a poll?”

The United States, perhaps? Muchnick says the attitude of many Israelis mirrors that of American liberals.

“I think, in America, they hate being part of ‘big bad America’, even though it’s successful and not quite as free as the founding fathers envisioned it to be,” he adds. “In Israel, these people – they’re not embarrassed to be Israeli; they’re embarrassed to be Jewish.”

Muchnick believes his nation needs leaders who will lead the country in accord with Jewish values as embodied in the Jewish Leadership Movement.

…meaning from the Nile to the Euphrates I assume…

“Nine/Eleven Finding Answers:” Just another MOSSAD 9/11 disinformation outlet?

“Nine/Eleven Finding Answers:” Just another

MOSSAD 9/11 disinformation outlet?

Greg Bacon’s blog

NEFA: Just another Zionist front organization that helps confuse and obfuscate the real truth about 9/11?

With names on its masthead like JOSH LEFKOWITZ, JEFF BREINHOLT and EVAN F. KOHLMANN, that seems to be the case. In this article in the Telegraph, NEFA pushes more agitprop about that famous “Jewish Jihadist,” Adam Gadahn.

Adam Pearlman, which is Gadahn’s real name and his grandfather is none other than the late Carl K. Pearlman; a prominent Jewish urologist in Orange County. Carl was also a member of the board of directors of the Anti-Defamation League, which was caught spying on Americans for Israel in 1993.

Any group who uses this obvious CIA created and MOSSAD run asset has questionable motives. Adam Pearlman, the
Jewish Mossad agent who once wrote stinging essays condemning Muslims as “bloodthirsty terrorists”, has once again popped up as an “Al-Qaeda spokesman” to frighten the dwindling number of Americans who still believe Al-Qaeda exists outside of U.S. intelligence circles.

The FBI lists Gadahn’s aliases as Abu Suhayb Al-Amriki, Abu Suhayb, Yihya Majadin Adams, Adam Pearlman, and Yayah.Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency was caught in 2002 creating a phony Al-Qaeda group to justify attacks on Palestinians.

Pearlman has a knack of releasing his tapes at the most politically opportune time for Bush, having first burst onto the scene shortly before the 2004 presidential election and then again right after Katrina when the President’s approval rating was tanking fast.

Now, with things going to hell in a hurry in the White House bogus “War on Terror” in both Afghanistan and Pakistan, Adam Pearlman pops up again, as being whacked by a Hellfire missile. Any bets as to whether or not Adam is dead or is this being used to distract the easily gullible American public with more sordid White House tales of getting their man, “Dead or Alive?”

How many times can you kill a CIA run, MOSSAD asset like Adam Pearlman? Will Adam, like Mustafa Abu al-Yazid , who’s been “killed” at least twice, pop up again, when the time is right to scare the hell out of Americans, just like the long dead Bin Laden has been used repeatedly over the years?

Just when the war mongers in the Bush WH are itching to go into Pakistan and grab their nukes, we start having stories come out about Bin Laden operating there.

How convenient.

Ask yourself this: If Bin Laden was still alive, who would you most fear meeting in a dark alley, Bin Laden or Dick Cheney?

Case closed.

It’s more than obvious that NEFA, like Rita Katz’s SITE and Ben Venzke’s IntelCenter, is nothing more than another Pentagon funded, MOSSAD run disinformation outlet, designed to constantly conflate the WH bogus “War on Terror” with the savagely brutal Israeli ethnic cleansing campaign of Occupied Palestine.

How else would they be able to get ahold of videos like this, unless the video was made in MOSSAD/CIA production studio?

Scenes from AQIM’s “Martyr Abu Ibrahim Mustafa” Terrorist Training Camp in North Africa (May 2008)

The NEFA Foundation has obtained video footage of lessons conducted by instructors from Al-Qaida’s Committee in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) at the “Martyr Abu Ibrahim Mustafa” terrorist training camp

Video Footage of a Recent Al-Qaida Suicide Bombing in Eastern Algeria (April 2008)

The NEFA Foundation has obtained and translated video footage of a recent Al-Qaida suicide bombing in eastern Algeria targeting a local military barracks in the town of Dellys. The footage includes the “martyrdom” will of the bomber (a young teenager who nicknamed himself “Abu Musab al-Zarqawi al-Asimi”), scenes from his education at the Abu Ibrahim Mustafa terrorist training camp in North Africa, and the actual execution of the attack itsel

Video Footage of IJU Terror Training Camp in Pakistan (April 2008)

The NEFA Foundation has obtained video footage of a terrorist training camp run by the Islamic Jihad Union (IJU) somewhere inside northwestern Pakistan.

“Martyrdom Wills” of the Transatlantic Bomb Plotters (April 2008)

Courtesy of the London Metropolitan Police Authority, the NEFA Foundation has obtained excerpted footage from the video-recorded “martyrdom wills” of Abdullah Ahmed Ali, Tanvir Hussain, Ibrahim Savant, Arafat Waheed Khan, and Waheed Zaman. The five men—along with Assad Sarwar, Mohammed Gulzar, and Umar Islam—are currently on trial in the United Kingdom for plotting the destruction of several U.S. and Canada-bound commercial flights in August 2006

Video of German Suicide Bomber in Afghanistan Cuneyt Ciftci (March 2008)

The NEFA Foundation has obtained footage documenting the first suicide attack carried out by a German national of Turkish origin in Afghanistan.

NEFA Video: “The Role of Foreign Fighters in the Iraqi Jihad” (May 2006)

A new video is available from the NEFA Foundation documenting the phenomenon of foreign fighters in Iraq and their precise role within the ongoing insurgency. The video includes footage of senior figures from Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s terrorist hierarchy (including Lebanese, Saudi, and Kuwaiti nationals) and scenes from actual Al-Qaida terror training camps inside of Iraq.

Here’s a question asked by NEFA:

Every day headlines around the globe show that those who plan and support terrorism aimed at attacking the United States and Europe have not been stopped and that more attacks should be anticipated. But who are ‘they’? Where does their money come from? How does the machinery of terror work? These are complex questions that drive the work of the NEFA Foundation.

May I? Who are they? They are Zionist stooges who have been recruited and trained at MOSSAD/CIA/MI 5 training camps around the world. Some of those prison sites kept hidden by the Bush WH are also used to train “jihadists,” who are then set loose upon an unsuspecting world to wreak havoc and cause terror, which is what the Bush/Cheney Junta, Downing Street and the rabid pack of hyenas running Israel want, a never ending series of staged terror events, so they’ll be able to use those events to further clamp down on civil liberties, increase military budgets and paramilitary forces to bring about their wanted New World Order, by fighting wars for Empire and Israel.

This is the true “Axis of Evil.” Washington, DC, London, England and Israel.

Thanks to Bush/Cheney, the World Chooses Sides

6 ex-Soviet neighbors back Russia over Georgia

MOSCOW (AP) — Russia scored an important diplomatic victory Friday when it secured support from six other former Soviet nations for its war in Georgia.

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said that he and other leaders of nations that are members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization signed a declaration Friday condemning Georgia’s attack aimed at regaining control of its breakaway province of South Ossetia.

The declaration said members of the group are “deeply concerned about an attempt by Georgia to solve the conflict in South Ossetia by force which has led to numerous casualties among civilian population and peacekeepers and entailed grave humanitarian consequences.”

The declaration also supported an “active role of Russia in helping peace and security in the region” and spoke about the need to “ensure firm security for South Ossetia and Abkhazia,” the two breakaway Georgian provinces whose independence Moscow has recognized.

Members of the security pact stopped short, however, of following Russia’s example in recognizing the two provinces. Medvedev said at a news conference that the alliance members will make a decision on the issue “proceeding from their national interests.”

The Russian-led security group links Russia with Armenia, Belarus and four Central Asian nations: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The support from resource-rich Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, which have been courted by the West, is particularly important for Russia.

The war in Georgia has plunged Russia’s relations with the West to their post-Cold War low. Only few countries, including Cuba and Venezuela, had previously backed Russia’s action. Friday’s statement represented a key victory for the Kremlin, which has struggled to expand its base of support.

The statement from the security alliance follows U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney’s trip this week to Azerbaijan, Georgia and Ukraine which Moscow intended to show support for their pro-Western governments.

Russia responded to Georgia’s attack on South Ossetia launched Aug. 7 by sending a military force that quickly routed the Georgian military and pushed deep into Georgia. The United States and the European Union nations have condemned the Russian attack on Georgia as disproportionate and strongly urged Moscow to withdraw its troops from the Georgian territory.

Russia lashed back at the United States, saying that U.S. military assistance to Georgia over the past several years had encouraged Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili to launch an offensive in South Ossetia. Russian officials have bristled at the U.S. deliveries of humanitarian aid to Georgia aboard U.S. Navy ships, saying the they could be a cover for weapons shipments.

The flagship of the U.S. Navy’s Mediterranean fleet anchored outside a key Georgian port Friday, defiantly bringing in tons of humanitarian aid to a city still partly occupied by hundreds of Russian troops.

In an apparent reference to a US$1 billion aid package announced by Washington, Medvedev sternly warned against providing more assistance to Georgia.

“We don’t want Georgia, which acted as the aggressor, to continue to arm itself in an uncontrolled way and with unknown aims and completely unclear consequences,” he said.

“It seems to me this is a lesson for the entire world community, including for those who make decisions to provide Georgia with extra financing and technical military cooperation,” Medvedev said without naming any nation.

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

U.S. Perpetuates Mass Killings In Iraq

U.S. Perpetuates Mass Killings In Iraq

in Featured Articles & Editorials

By Peter Phillips

The United States is directly responsible for over one million Iraqi deaths since the invasion five and half years ago.  In a January 2008 report, a British polling group Opinion Research Business (ORB) reports that, “survey work confirms our earlier estimate that over 1,000,000 Iraqi citizens have died as a result of the conflict which started in 2003…. We now estimate that the death toll between March 2003 and August 2007 is likely to have been of the order of 1,033,000. If one takes into account the margin of error associated with survey data of this nature then the estimated range is between 946,000 and 1,120,000”.

The ORB report comes on the heels of two earlier studies conducted by Johns Hopkins University published in the Lancet medical journal that confirmed the continuing numbers of mass deaths in Iraq.  A study done by Dr. Les Roberts from January 1, 2002 to March 18 2003 put the civilian deaths at that time at over 100,000. A second study published in the Lancet in October 2006 documented over 650,000 civilian deaths in Iraq since the start of the US invasion.  The 2006 study confirms that US aerial bombing in civilian neighborhoods caused over a third of these deaths and that over half the deaths are directly attributable to US forces.

The now estimated 1.2 million dead, as of July 2008, includes children, parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, cab drivers, clerics, schoolteachers, factory workers, policemen, poets, healthcare workers, day care providers, construction workers, babysitters, musicians, bakers, restaurant workers and many more. All manner of ordinary people in Iraq have died because the United States decided to invade their country. These are deaths in excess of the normal civilian death rate under the prior government.

The magnitude of these deaths is undeniable. The continuing occupation by US forces guarantees a mass death rate in excess of 10,000 people per month with half that number dying at the hands of US forces— a carnage so severe and so concentrated at to equate it with the most heinous mass killings in world history. This act has not gone unnoticed.

Recently, Dennis Kucinich introduced a single impeachment article against George W. Bush for lying to Congress and the American people about the reasons for invading Iraq. On July 15 The House forwarded the resolution to the Judiciary Committee with a 238 to 180 vote.  That Bush lied about weapons of mass destruction and Iraq’s threat to the US is now beyond doubt. Former US federal prosecutor Elizabeth De La Vega documents the lies most thoroughly in her book U.S. Vs Bush, and numerous other researchers have verified Bush’s untrue statements.

The American people are faced with a serious moral dilemma. Murder and war crimes have been conducted in our name. We have allowed the war/occupation to continue in Iraq and offered ourselves little choice within the top two presidential candidates for immediate cessation of the mass killings. McCain would undoubtedly accept the deaths of another million Iraqi civilians in order to save face for America, and Obama’s 18-month timetable for withdrawal would likely result in another 250,000 civilian deaths or more.

We owe our children and ourselves a future without the shame of mass murder on our collective conscience. The only resolution of this dilemma is the immediate withdrawal of all US troops in Iraq and the prosecution and imprisonment of those responsible. Anything less creates a permanent original sin on the soul of the nation for that we will forever suffer.

Peter Phillips is a Professor of Sociology at Sonoma State University and director of Project Censored a media research group.  He is the co-editor with Dennnis Loo of the book Impeach the President: The Case Against Bush and Cheney.

Bush Prepares Escape Route From War Crimes, “US Military Moves in Paraguay Rattle Regional Relations”

“US Military Moves in Paraguay Rattle Regional Relations”

Sam Logan and Matthew Flynn

Five hundred U.S. troops arrived in Paraguay with planes, weapons, and ammunition in July 2005, shortly after the Paraguayan Senate granted U.S. troops immunity from national and International Criminal Court (ICC) jurisdiction. Neighboring countries and human rights organizations are concerned that the massive air base at Mariscal Estigarribia, Paraguay is potential real estate for the U.S. military.

While U.S. and Paraguayan officials vehemently deny ambitions to establish a U.S. military base at Mariscal Estigarribia, the ICC immunity agreement and U.S. counterterrorism training exercises have increased suspicions that the U.S. is building a stronghold in a region that is strategic to resource and military interests.

The Mariscal Estigarribia air base is within 124 miles of Bolivia and Argentina, and 200 miles from Brazil, near the Triple Frontier where Brazil, Paraguay, and Argentina meet. Bolivia’s natural gas reserves are the second largest in South America, while the Triple Frontier region is home to the Guarani Aquifer, one of the world’s largest fresh water sources. (See Story #20.)

Not surprisingly, U.S. rhetoric is building about terrorist threats in the triborder region. Dangl reports claims by Defense officials that Hezbollah and Hamas, radical Islamic groups from the Middle East, receive significant funding from the Triple Frontier, and that growing unrest in this region could leave a political “black hole” that would erode other democratic efforts. Dangl notes that in spite of frequent attempts to link terror networks to the triborder area, there is little evidence of a connection.

The base’s proximity to Bolivia may cause even more concern. Bolivia has a long history of popular protest against U.S. exploitation of its vast natural gas reserves. But the resulting election of leftist President Evo Morales, who on May 1, 2006 signed a decree nationalizing all of Bolivia’s gas reserves, has certainly intensified hostilities with the U.S.1

When Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld visited Paraguay in August of 2005, he told reporters that, “there certainly is evidence that both Cuba and Venezuela have been involved in the situation in Bolivia in unhelpful ways.”

Military analysts from Uruguay and Bolivia maintain that the threat of terrorism is often used by the U.S. as an excuse for military intervention and the monopolization of natural resources.

A journalist writing for the Argentinian newspaper, Clarin, visited the base at Mariscal Estigarribia and reported it to be in perfect condition. Capable of handling large military planes, it is oversized for the Paraguayan air force, which only has a handful of small aircraft. The base is capable of housing 16,000 troops, has an enormous radar system, huge hangars, and an air traffic control tower. The airstrip itself is larger than the one at the international airport in Asuncion, Paraguay’s capital. Near the base is a military camp that has recently grown in size.

Hallinan notes that Paraguay’s neighbors are very skeptical of the situation, as there is a disturbing resemblance between U.S. denials about Mariscal Estigarribia and the disclaimers made by the Pentagon about Eloy Alfaro airbase in Manta, Ecuador. The U.S. claimed the Manta base was a “dirt strip” used for weather surveillance. When local journalists revealed its size, however, the U.S. admitted the base harbored thousands of mercenaries and hundreds of U.S. troops, and Washington had signed a ten-year basing agreement with Ecuador. (See Chapter 2, Story #17, for similarities between the Manta air base in Ecuador, and the current situation unfolding in Paraguay.)

As Paraguay breaks ranks with her neighbors by allowing the U.S. to carry out military operations in the heart of South America, Logan and Flynn report that nongovernmental organizations in Paraguay are protesting the new U.S. military presence in their country, warning that recent moves could be laying the foundation for increasing U.S. presence and influence over the entire region. Perhaps the strongest words come from the director of the Paraguayan human rights organization Peace and Justice Service, Orlando Castillo, who claims that the U.S. aspires to turn Paraguay into a “second Panama for its troops, and it is not far from achieving its objective to control the Southern Cone and extend the Colombian War.”

Note
1. “Bolivian Gas War,” http://www.Wikipedia.org, May 2006.

UPDATE BY BENJAMIN DANGL

The election of Evo Morales in Bolivia in December of 2005 brought more attention to the U.S. military presence in neighboring Paraguay. Since his election, Morales has nationalized the country’s gas reserves and strengthened ties with Cuba and Venezuela to build a more sustainable economy. Such policies have not been warmly received in Washington. Responding to this progressive trend, on May 22, 2006 George Bush said he was “concerned about the erosion of democracy” in Venezuela and Bolivia.

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, himself a victim of a U.S.-backed coup, said Bush’s comments mean, “He’s already given the green light to start conspiring against the democratic government of Bolivia.” U.S. troops stationed in Paraguay may be poised for such an intervention. However, human rights reports suggest the U.S. military presence has already resulted in bloodshed.

Paraguay is the fourth largest producer of soy in the world. As this industry expands, poor farmers are being forced off their lands. These farmers have organized protests, road blockades and land occupations against this displacement and have faced subsequent repression from military, police, and paramilitary forces.

Investigations by Servicio Paz y Justicia (Serpaj), a human rights group in Paraguay, report that the worst cases of repression against farmers took place in areas with the highest concentration of U.S. troops. This violence resulted in the deaths of forty-one farmers in three separate areas.

“The U.S. military is advising the Paraguayan police and military about how to deal with these farmer groups,” Orlando Castillo of Serpaj told me over the phone. He explained that U.S. troops monitor farmers to find information about union organizations and leaders, then tell Paraguayan officials how to proceed. “The numbers from our study show what this U.S. presence is doing,” Castillo said.

The U.S. government maintains the military exercises in Paraguay are humanitarian efforts. However, the deputy speaker of the Paraguayan parliament, Alejandro Velazquez Ugarte, said that of the thirteen exercises going on in the country, only two are of a civilian nature.

This presence is an example of the U.S. government’s “counter-insurgency” effort in Latin America. Such meddling has a long, bloody history in the region. Currently, the justification is the threat of terrorism instead of communism. As Latin America shifts further away from Washington’s interests, such militarization is only likely to increase.

Throughout these recent military operations, the U.S. corporate media, as well as Paraguayan media, have ignored the story. Soccer, not dead farmers or plans for a coup, has been the focus of most headlines.

For ongoing reports on the U.S. militarization of Paraguay and elsewhere visit http://www.UpsideDownWorld.org, a website on activism and politics in Latin America, and http://www.TowardFreedom.com. Benjamin Dangl’s book, The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia (forthcoming from AK Press, January 2007), includes further investigations into the U.S. military operations in Paraguay.

Ideas for action include organizing protests and writing letters to the U.S. embassy in Paraguay (http://www.asuncion.usembassy.gov). For more information on international solidarity, email Orlando Castillo at Serpaj in Paraguay:

UPDATE BY CONN HALLINAN

My article was written in late November 2005 during the run-up to the Bolivian elections. That campaign featured indigenous leader Evo Morales, a fierce critic of Washington’s neoliberal, free trade policies that have impoverished tens of millions throughout Latin America. The Bush administration not only openly opposed Morales, it charged there was a growing “terrorism” problem in the region and began building up military forces in nearby Paraguay.

There have been a number of important developments since last fall. Morales won the election and nationalized Bolivia’s petrochemical industry. In the past, such an action might have triggered a U.S.-sponsored coup, or at least a crippling economic embargo. Foreign oil and gas companies immediately tried to drive a wedge between Bolivia and other nations in the region by threatening to halt investments or pull out entirely. This included companies partially owned by Brazil and Argentina.

But Latin America is a very different place these days. Three days after the May 1, 2005 nationalization, Argentine President Nestor Kirchner, Brazilian President Lula De Silva, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, and Morales met in Puerto Iguazu and worked out an agreement to help Bolivia develop its resources while preserving regional harmony. As a result, it is now likely that foreign petrochemical companies will remain in Bolivia, although they will pay up to four times as much as they did under the old agreements. And if they leave, the Chinese and Russians are waiting in the wings.

The situation is still delicate. U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld recently compared Chavez to Adolph Hitler and linked him to Cuba’s Fidel Castro and Morales. Aid is flowing to militaries in Colombia and Paraguay, and the White House continues to use private proxies to intervene in the Colombian civil war. While there is a growing solidarity among nations in the southern cone, some of their economies are delicate.

Ecuador is presently wracked by demonstrations demanding the expulsion of foreign oil companies and an end to free trade talks with the U.S. This is an ongoing story. While the alternative media continues to cover these developments, the mainstream media has largely ignored them.

A note on reading the mainstream: the Financial Times recently highlighted a Latinobarometro poll indicating that most countries in South America were rejecting “democracy” as a form of government. But since free markets and neoliberalism were sold as “democracy”—economic policies that most South Americans have overwhelmingly rejected—did the poll measure an embrace of authoritarianism or a rejection of failed economic policies? Tread carefully.

To stay informed of developments in this area visit websites of School of the Americas Watch: http://www.soaw.org/new/ and Global Exchange: http://www.globalexchange.org/

Pakistan reopens vital border for payment of $365 million

Pakistan reopens vital border for NATO
Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:53:31 GMT

Trucks loaded with supplies for NATO forces

Pakistan has reopened a vital supply route to NATO forces in Afghanistan after receiving a payment of $365 million from the US.

Pakistan’s Defense Minister, Chaudhry Ahmed Mukhtar, said the border route had been closed in response to recent raids by US-led forces inside Pakistani territory, which violated the sovereignty of the country.

Mukhtar added that the closure demonstrated to the US that Islamabad would not tolerate airstrikes and raids inside its borders.

On Friday, Pakistan stopped trucks from crossing the Torkham border crossing. They were carrying fuel and other supplies to US-led NATO forces inside Afghanistan. The action followed US-led attacks that killed at least 20 Pakistani civilians in tribal areas bordering Afghanistan.

According to reports, the US paid $365 million to Pakistan as funding for the war on terror immediately after the closure of the border. The border was subsequently reopened.

An estimated 70 percent of NATO supplies move through Khyber to support US-led troops stationed in Afghanistan.

In the past week, US drones have violated Pakistan’s airspace more than four times. US strikes on border territories have killed scores of Pakistani civilians this year and have sparked national outrage.

The Pakistani government has strongly condemned US cross-border military operations and has repeatedly said that foreign forces are not permitted to operate on Pakistani soil.

Caracas, Moscow plan naval drills

Caracas, Moscow plan naval drills
Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:26:45 GMT

Russian Prime Minister Putin (R) shakes hands with Venezuela’s President Chavez.

Four Russian ships and 1,000 soldiers will participate in joint naval exercises with Venezuela adding to the strain in US-Russia relations.

The exercises, which will also involve Venezuelan aircraft and submarines, are scheduled for 10 to 14 November in the Caribbean Sea, Venezuela’s Rear Admiral Salbatore Cammarata Bastidas said on Saturday.

The maneuvers are likely to heighten already tense diplomatic ties between Moscow and Washington following Russia’s involvement in the recent Georgian conflict.

The US has tenuous relations with Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez, who has voiced approval for Russian involvement in the Caucuses, saying the US is intimidated by Moscow’s “new world potential”.

Moscow and Caracas have a strategic alliance, initiated by President Chavez in July, which extends bilateral cooperation on energy, allowing three Russian energy companies to operate in Venezuela.

US Vice-President Dick Cheney, one of Russia’s most vocal detractors, has condemned Russian involvement in Georgia, saying it was an affront to civilized standards resembling brute force as it was exercised by the Soviet Union.

He added that Russia is using its vast energy resources as a weapon against the Western world.

In line with this mode of thought, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Saturday that the much-anticipated deal for civilian nuclear cooperation with Russia should be put on hold for now.

The nuclear deal which was signed in May would give the US access to modern Russian technology in the nuclear field and would provide Russia with lucrative import and storage opportunities for spent nuclear fuel from American-supplied reactors around the world.

THE HISTORIC POST-CAPITALIST PROJECT

THE HISTORIC POST-CAPITALIST PROJECT

From a paper by Heinz Dieterich
THE GEOPOLITICS OF CAPITALISM. GOVERNMENT FOR THE ELITE.
The objective of the traditional capitalist economy is the prosperity of the ruling class. The government has the obligation to protect  the nation’s class economic interests in foreign transactions ( customs tariffs, taxes, restriccions on imports) and making them be obeyed internationally (embargos, sanctions, war). The government should not limit the free development of the economy. Real estate, natural resources and means of production are private property. The structure of the economy is top down  hierarchical.  Every type of decision is in the hands of the owners of the means of production. The type and quantity of production, as well as the distribution of merchandise, is automatically regulated through supply and demand,  through  the market economy. The market economy is based of free market competition, which automatically leads to supposedly harmonizing individual and social interests.by means of free competition, through which the price of each product reaches its natural level, and which over time equals its average value. Human labor is for sale, its price is determined by supply and demand, like any other product.
The pursuit of profits is the dominant activating motor of the economy.The government is the servant of the dominant class, and as such, it is a class government. It nevertheless has to continue taking care of certain social needs, such as public order and health, but all its functions are collated through its class character and class functions. If there is not enough money to cover the national debt and education too, the bankers have to get paid first. If the budget is not enough to pay the internal debt, and also health services, the bankers get the first crack. Their interests distort and determine all the functions of the government.  Humanity has fallen into the hands of a delinquent elite, made up of ten thousand bankers, industrial heads and professional politicians, who use the planet’s resources and the fruits of our labor for their own ends. They monopolize for themselves the benefits that energy, technology, science, food production, education and health provide, leaving the majority in poverty and neglect.  This system has  characteristics that identify it; 1. It is vertical and antidemocratic, top down, 2.- It is dominated by the Atlantic bourgeosie, that is, by North Americans and Europeans, 3.- It  exploits others  through the national market economy, its insistence in formal democracy, and reliance on the class government. These institutions are untouchable because they are its support, because they unify all government operations, and because they guarantee its stability and day to day reproduction.The neocon New World Order that we now see is the third strategic attempt in the last hundred years by the Atlantic bourgeosie   to impose on global society its vision of the world.
THE THREE WORLD ORDERS. The First World Order straight jacket  was placed by world rulers at  Versalles (1919) at the end of the First World War. This repartition of the world brought as consequence the deliberate reduction of German power,  guaranteeing the supremacy of England and France, and the new partitioning of the colonies (in Africa and elsewhere) of the defeated countries (by Belgium, Portugal, etc) for control of  natural resources.  It also resulted in the consolidation of US power in the Pacific in the face of emerging Japnese might, and the installation of a super-national organism to mediate between nations (the League of Nations). This first attempt at world control was flawed and unable to survive beyond 1946. The Second World Order was hatched during the Yalta and Potsdam conferences. Under capitalists and socialists, its stability lay in their mutually assured destruction, so that  its dynamism came from the “New American Century”, on one hand , and the struggle for national liberation and social anti imperialist struggles on the other. This system collapsed with the implosion of the Soviet Union giving way to a transition phase that lasted until 2001. This transition was defined by three broad strategies;1.-  Imperial domination (The New American Century) 2.- The spontaneous, de facto evolution of the world  toward multipolarity, especially considering the importance of China and the European Union, 3.- The democratic struggles against neoliberal tyranny. The 911 events modified these tendencies, giving birth to a Third World Order which has the following characteristics; THE MIDDLE EAST. 1.- The neocolonial control the US  has over the Middle East, including Isarel, Egypt, Jordan and now Palestine. Tel Aviv will have to accept the reality of the government of Palestine, transformed into an economic neocolonial dependency of Israel and the US, which will lessen tensions in the principal petroleum deposits in the world.   ASIA. 2.- A second strategic area destined to fall under the domination of the US elite is Central Asia.  Uzbekistan already has a military  alliance with the American Empire, which has trained its army since 1995. (Relations have since soured). The stationing of troops there and in Afghanistan gives the US their desired military presence in Central Asia, which has the second oil deposits in the world, and much of the gas reserves. After 911, the US  has recovered the strategic initiative it had lost, and the strategic alliance between Russia, China and the Central Asian republics will lose much of its significance. SOUTHERN ASIA. The 3rd most important region will be southern Asia- the formation of a block between Washington, Pakistan and India (totalling 1.4 billion people) which will serve to contain China, allowing for a war against China that without that alliance is untenable.  Of course, plans go awry. The conflict newtween Pakistan and India over Kashmir makes them questionable. The US  is attempting to smooth things over, cancelling sanctions against Pakistan, and preparing multimillion dollar aid (bribe) packages to both countries. The future of Russia, according to the plan,  lies in its integration with  NATO, the European Union the WTO, and the withdrawal of any proximity to China. The EU can provide capital and technology that the underdeveloped  Russian economy needs, and in return it has  the territorial potential, the raw materials, and the strategic arms will make Europe  an imperialst  Leviathan that will rival the US. EUROPE. Another important element in the world order is the accelerated  rebirth of  European  imperialism, where the recycled right wing of the thirties,  the inheritors of Mussolini, Franco, Berlusconi and Aznar, along with the socialdemocrats Schroeder, Lord Palmerston (Blair and Giddens) and the cameleon Fischer, have formed a rainbow of new superpower imperial might, backed by the introduction of the Euro. In the Third World Order, NATO substitues the United Nations, just as the force of arms substituted the League of Nations in the thirties. China and Japan remain dangerously outside this block, along with humanity itself and any hope for democracy. Supposedly Japan will join as a subordinate ally, and the Atlantic elite will practice a policy of containment vis à vis China to turn  it into a neocolony. By integrating Russia into the European Union, they will get rid of the last remaning rivals to their hegemony over the planet. The control of the four strategic regionswill consolidate Washington’s position as world power and will stoke neocon dreams of extending the American Century forever. The abandonment of Salt I and II and the creation of the antiballistic shield is a return to the military doctrines of the fifties, based on the notion that it is possible to dominate the world and the global society militarily  by means of preventive nuclear war. The Third World order seeks to transform the world village into a  militarized  world  assembly line (maquiladora). This idea was first developed by the Nazis in their Grossraum-Ordnungspolitik of Adolf Hitler, which was the basis of his annexionist policies and which unleashed WWII. If the determined attempts of the Atlantic bourgeoisie to extend the world system of exploitation, after the European invasions  of 1492, worries us,  their  methodology  during  the last ten years  is equally troublesome. The enormous ease with which they have had military success in Panamá, Iraq, Kosovo and Afghanistan has reestablished the M.O. of the classic imperialsm of the 19th Century. The political ultimatum, and then the military attack, are used as a fundamental instrument of policy. With the disappearance of the USSR, the way has been cleared for the Empire to extend itself as had been visualized by the leading nationalsocialist thinker, Carl Schmitt in the 30s.
LATIN AMERICA. NAFTA, ALCA and Plan Colombia are geared to liquidate the Latin America motherland (patria) as a viable entity and annex it to the geopolitical system of the US. The designation of guerrillas as terrorists, the systematic fascist ethnic cleasing of the peasants  by the paramilitaries, the clearing out of San Vicente del Caguán, under Washington’s orders, the coup against to Venezuelan government, the forcing and financing of a neoliberal contra as a candidate in Nicaragua, and the ALCA fast track initiative all point to Washington’s designs for the area.  Another essential plan for the Third World Order to succeed  is the prevention of democracy by means of repression and governmental  terrorism. This includes the neutralization of liberation movements, (FARC/ELN) and progressive governments, such a   Venezuela, as well as backward anticolonial movements, such as the Taliban.  The war against Afghanistan, which midwived the Third World Order, amalgamates the alliance between the European bourgeosie and the American one  against the Third World. Whatever their tactical differences, they stand united against the “wretched of the earth”.
FORMAL DEMOCRACY. THE FAILURE OF DEMOCRACY. The myth of representation is as follows; “political sovereignty lies with the people. Since the majority cannot exercise their democratic rights directly, they delegate them through parliamentary representatives, who are at the same time  governmental  organs. All branches of power emanate from popular sovereignty. They are legitimate powers. ” This in fact has nothing to do with reality. Representatives and senators don’t represent those  w ho have given them power, but rather they substitute them. They are elected to serve the people, but instead they serve two masters; the ruling elites and their own interests.
THE MARKET ECONOMY. THE FAILURE OF CAPITALISM. The market economy, dedicated  to producing wealth, is not capable of satisfying the socioeconomic and ecological needs of the world’s seven billion people, because of five systemic limitations; FIRST, the system is unplanned and  unstable, because it lacks a universal means of coordinating its strategic variables of investment and consumption. This anarchy of production results in the contradiction between the social character of production and the private confiscation of production, and thus makes the recurring crises inevitable. SECOND. It is an asymmetrical system, that is, the chasing after wealth produces the concentration and centralization of capital and the wealth of the society in a few  hands, and the correctives of bourgeois political democracy don’t have the strength to repair the damage. THIRD. The logic of the evolution of the global economy is market oriented and nationalist. In contradiction, the operative elements are the transnational companies which belong to the economic elites in their contry of origin, and require military protection from their country of origin   to function globally. FOURTH. The transnational corporations exclude not only other enterprises, but all the citizens of the world community, who have no say so in their decisions. This explains why the results of the world economy do not satisfy the needs of the world’s population. FIFTH. The development and use of resources of the first world is simply ecologically unsustainable. The corporations are inacapable of reducing their mad dash for ever greater wealth and usurpation of more and more resources, and settle for a rational economy. The way they use the law of value is incompatible with a democratic, equal and sustainable global society, stable for everyone at a world wide level.
* * *
THE THREE VIRTUES OF HUMAN BEINGS ARE; 1.- Critical and rational thinking, 2.- Esthetic and artistic capacity, 3.- Ethical and moral potential. These cannot develop under capitalism for everyone, and this constitutes one of the most basic violations of human rights
FUNDAMENTAL NEEDS OF HUMANITY. Democracy has to start with an assessment of the needs of the people. First is the need for food, which is where the economy, its relations and institutions come from. The economy is thus a social relation, where nature is transformed into goods and services to satisfy the material needs of humans. Humans additionally  have a need to communicate, and  for understanding, to live and act in a community. This is where culture is born, with its relations and institutions, which include all the citizens of a society, by means of shared language, values, and traditions. There is also the  need to make decisions in the name of the community. Here is where politics is born, with its relations and institutions, having as its most important organ the Government, which satisfies the need for defense from outside aggression, which gives birth to the military with its relations and institutions. The question is, if formal democracy cannot satisfy the needs of humanity, what can?
PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY. While war, recession and the New World Order are accurate descriptions of the governments  bourgeois society has developed  historically, and what that foreshadows  for the  future of  humanity, participatory democracy is the answer given by the people It constitutes the hope and new direction of social movements. None of the three calamities of humanity; poverty, war and domination, is casual or by chance. All are the inevitable result of the institutions that sustain capitalism; the national market economy, the government divided into classes, and  formal democracy run by a plutocracy of the rich. The capitalist government  does not allow people  to act in an ethical, critical and esthetic manner, but rather promotes the anti-values of selfishness, power and exploitation. It is this double structural deficiency of bourgeois society, the anti-ethical and the disfunctional, unresposive to the needs of the majority, which condemns it to become obsolete and to be substituted by new institutions, which are: 1.- Participatory democracy, 2.- A democratically planned economy of equivalencies,  3.- A government which is not divided into classes, and, as a result, 4.- A citizenry who is rational,  ethical  and esthetic.
This renaissance of a liberating activism that is moving toward a post-capitalist society is manifested in any number of  rebellions and popular uprisings. This wave of rebellion is beginning to take hold in universities, where the theories of the future are being discussed, and in other socialist countries where participatory democracy is being practiced. There is no need to resign oneself to the trilogy of poverty, war and domination, because these will disappear with the disappearance of the bourgeosie, which marks, at the same time, the  end of human pre-history.
Participatory democracy refers to the ability of  the majority to run the public affairs of the nation. This is a cualitative widening of formal democray, where the only power lies in parties and personalities. In participatory democracy the peoples’ participation is permanent and ongoing in all areas of social life, from the factories to the barracks and universities and communications media channels. Representative democracy–in reality a substitution for democracy— is replaced by the higher form of direct referendum democracy. The traditional parliamentary and electoral systems which  are controlled by the economic elites  have no place in the democratic process of  the future. The same is true for indoctrinational  monopolies (schools, television, radio and the press). Big business is actually a private tyranny within a military structure–and it is incompatible with real democracy and will disappear in time. The government as a class organization is destined to follow the same path to oblivion. Representative democracy was in its time an indispensible element in the evolution toward direct democracy, while the technical means for people’s mass participation were lacking. That stage has passed. Today technological and economic  conditions allow for a new   takeover  of real people’s  power and sovereignty, power that had been taken away by two hundred years of oligarchy.
THE ECONOMY OF EQUIVALENCIES.  It seems relatively easy to work out a matrix to ascertain the value of products that supposedly are the result of few and easily identified labor steps. Everything begins with the cultivation of the land.  For example, take 50 lbs of potatoes; if the farmer has harvested 240,000 lbs of potatoes on his 10 acres, and there remain 30,000 lbs of seeds taken from the previous harvest, then 50 lbs represent 1/4200 parts of the work time that were spent on the production of 210,000 lbs.. Let’s assume that  (hoeing and fertilizing) equals 90 hours. Turning over the earth 10 hours, planting seeds, 30 hours, herbicides 5 hours. Three   weeks later attention paid to the rows, 10 hours, insceticides, 2 hours, repetition of these practices, 12 hours. Four or five months after there is the  harvest, two farmers at 80 hours equal 160 hours. Transportation of the harvest to the warehouse, 15 hours, sorting and bagging the potatoes, four farmers at 50 hours equals 200 hours. Finally, the delivery to the buyer or cooperative, 50 hours. Total 594 hours equals 35, 640 minutes, divided by 4,200 equals 8.5 minutes.  That represents the value of those 50 lbs of potatoes, in labor time spent. This means that anyone wishing to buy 50 lbs. of potatoes will simply work 8.5 minutes to obtain them. If it determined that a house takes a month to build, one works for a month and gets the house.  Since everybody works, the time is kept track of on a plastic card that can be used anywhere in the world, since an hour of labor is equivalent to an hour of labor anywhere and by anybody. This will guarantee the end of want, and since there is no money, there is no profit and therefore no exploitation.
There is no doubt that doing away with profit, selfishness, greed and exploitation, the ending of  which are inherent in the principle of equivalencies, will lead to human changes so profound in the way of thinking and acting, that after it has become generally accepted, one can speak in terms of a new human being. Those who have been rescued from the degradation of bourgeois institutions will find in real economic democracy the support necessary to fully develop their rational capacities (science), morality (ethics) and esthetics (art). Once the division of manual and intellectual work has been overcome, when the exhausting and brutalizing yoke of profit has been abolished, discrimination as to color, sex, and income has been done away with, and the difference between city and countryside has been overcome, human beings will drink from the three fountains of our humanity; work, eros and knowledge. In practice most of these calculations will have been made ahead of time from past experience, and their determination of the value of hours worked will be greatly simplified.  Land use, capital and profit are not factored in, only work hours spent, because those things are holdovers from a market economy. They do not figure in an economy of equivalencies, because they show the differential between value and price. Under capitalism, price is greater than value. In the economy of equivalencies, value and price are interchangeable; there is no profit. When all the production in the world has been evaluated in terms of work hours, the value of production  can be made precise.
The unstable,  undemocratic  rapacious  market economy will be substituted by a democratically planned economy. These problems can only be overcome by going to a higher level than the traditional one, by combining the theory of value with the principle of equivalencies. In this case, salary will be equivalent to the amount of time invested in the work, independently of age, sex, civil government, skin color,  nationality, type of work, physical effort, time spent in school, energy use, capacity, professional experience, enthusiasm for the job. In other words, salary equals plainly and absolutely the time spent of the labor. In this scenario, price equals value and does not include anything that is not the equivalency of time-work spent in the production of goods and services. This way  value is substituted by price, and the circle is closed. It puts and end to exploitation, that is, the appropriation of the work of others, where the work of one is  valued higher than that of another. Each human being is fully paid for the complete value that he/she has brought to the goods and services. This very simple process, that radically changes traditional economies, needs to have a few conditions. The theory of the value of work needs to include the human activities that go beyond the self- sufficiency of the individual, especially in  those jobs we call services, doctors, judges, nurses, typists, mail carriers, teachers, managers, bus drivers, sweepers, cooks,  ministers,  barbers,  journalists, etc. that is, those not directly involved in the production of goods.
THE NEW REVOLUTIONARY CLASS.  Who will bring the program about? The answer is obvious; those who are being destroyed by the new phase of globalized capitalist accumulation, known as neoliberal economics. What are seen as ethnic conflicts (Chiapas, Ecuador, Chile, etc,) are in reality the epicenter of a profound political economic dynamic; the attempted destruction of the Latin American peasantry.  What unites the diferent struggles; Zapatistas, MST in Brasil, struggles in Paraguay, the Auracanos in Chile, uprisings in Colombia and Ecuador, is the attempted annihilation of 200 million Latin American citizens through savage original accumulation of capital in those areas. At the same time this destruction of the peasantry is accompanied by the devastation of tens of millions of workers who are being reduced to poverty, as a result of Latin American nationalism, which is being supplanted by neo colonial industrialization. Small merchants cannot escape economic ruin either, in the tens of millions, because the laws of the market, backed up by their governments, are made to benefit the strongest. The victims of these social classes, the peasantry, the workers, the small merchants, are joined by the vast army of unemployed and under employed, where one finds Afroamericans, indigenous peoples,  housewives, critical intellectuals and other social actors who are not class bound, who have nothing to do with  neoliberal brutality, or who dont want to be complicit in an unjustifiable set of circumstances.
THE POLITICAL PROGRAM. What has to happen is a program rooted in the masses, with organized members who have the authority and the consciousness and are capable of operating, to bring about equality.  Student conferences can give new academic life to  the country, workers can paralize regional economies, truckers and  peasants can blockade highways, small and middle merchants unions, political parties, can express their political will at a hemispheric level.
TECHNOLOGY CAN BE USED FOR REAL DEMOCRACY. Productive technologies that have developed as a result of scientific revolutions, expecially microelectronics, where the first quantum computer has been built based on manipulation of singular atoms, and in microbiology where greater capacity of molecular design has made the frontiers of natural limits in biology and nanotechnology recede, have increased the productivity of human labor  so  that now we can a.- )guarantee the satisfaction of basic human needs for all the members of the global society, and b.-) we can simultaenously reduce the necessary workday so that all citizens can participate in the public affairs of their societies. Throughout history, humans have lived in extreme dependency upon nature. For the first time, scarcity and a precarious existence have been defeated.  Freedom  from want is, in terms of productive forces, a fact. (The productive forces are the unity of accumulated and living labor, the totality of material and personal elements of production necesary for the production of things to satisfy human requirements ) If this fact is not translated in energizing  the relations of production and of political power, the people will not benefit. (The relations of production include the ownership of the means of production which, if equal, result in cooperation and mutual help. In  those relations of production where ownership is private and unequal, relations of domination and subjugation are established). With the development of productive technology, the ruling bourgeosie has taken the first step in objectively emancipating the population; the second step will be taken without it.
THE REFERENDUMS OF THE  NEW HISTORICAL PROJECT.. The first phase in overcoming  global capitalism is going on now. It began with the criticism of the capitalist system  in the 90s and is characterized by the post-bourgeois programs and the depauperization of the middle class. This struggle has three phases; 1.- Class structures and class consciousness, 2.- The strategic aims of the New Historical Project and  3.- Correlation of forces between the  main  political players. The objective of this transitional phase is to make massive numbers of people aware of the real, fundamental issues,  so that the masses can become truly democratized, and by neutralizing  capitalist propaganda and ideology, to prevent it from setting  the program for world development. The program for change in a post capitalist society will blunt the aims of existing power relations so that demands will stop being abstract issues and take on real, tangible  struggle in everyday life. Within this context certain objectives can be identified, primarily the democratization of the economy. It is necessary for the people to have control over the macroeconomy, how the budget is spent in production and distribution. Investment affects political and social power as well as determining  the  standard of living and social security of the majority of the population. Priority investment and the proportion of the gross national income related to it must be decided by referendum. The national yearly budget must also be discussed and put forth in a referendum after public debate. This is as true for the national budget as for local, municipal and government levels. This is already being done in Brazil in areas controlled by the Partido dos Trabalhadores. Each community has an internet access (run by the community itself) which registers views and opinions of the community members.  In the same way,  the leveling out of wealth between the urban centers and the countryside, the concentration of which represents the power of the super-rich plutocracy , will insure greater economic growth and social justice  for the people and a reduction in delinquent and criminal behavior. The democratization of culture means giving access to the means of communication to everyone, the distribution of TV channels, control of which is  given  to important sectors of society, such as workers, employees, entrepeneurs, housewives, indigenous peoples, students, etc. The formation of scholarships to Third World Artists to prevent the brain drain and flight to the First World, the returning of cultural artefacts to their original countries, payment of salaries to housewives, a living  wage in time credits to all members of society, whether they are able to work or not, the discussion and referendum  to decide when and if to start or end a war, (a decision the elites have usurped for themselves) the reorganization  of the centralized Government that oppresses minorities, into a federalist government that respects autonomy of minorities that live within its borders, the promotion of representation of groups that are underrepresented for reasons of  sexist, ethnic or historical discrimination, so that they are integrated into public life (government, school boards, etc) and in  private corporations.
On the international scene, the same is true for the cancellation of the external debt, a balance in exchange rates, an end to proteccionism by the wealthy nations, an indemnization of the Third World for colonial plunder. Reparations for the Holocaust Jews, victims of slavery, of forced labor, should all be indemnified.  NATO should be dismanteled, as well as the retrograde Security Council of the UN, which refuses to recognize the division of powers, with no democratic control, falling even outside of the Tribunal at The Hague. This can be brought up at the General Assembly with the principle of one nation, one vote, and the rectification of the  distribution of the wealth that is being monopolized at the rate of 80-20. All of these constitute the first phase of the New Historical Project.                                         From a paper by Heinz Dieterich.