10,000-member Lashkar raised in Kabal

10,000-member Lashkar raised in Kabal

By Essa Khankhel

a lashkar of 10,000 members was raised from different areas of Kabal tehsil in order to stop the comeback of the militants in the area.Addressing the lashkar at Kanju airport, Brig Salman Akbar claimed the militants had been defeated and the fleeing members of the banned TTP were being chased. ìTerrorists have been eliminated in Swat and noose around the elusive terrorists was being tightened. They will be arrested soon,î he said. He said the purpose behind formation of the lashkars was to restore peace to each and every village. He asked the people to join hands with the security forces to make Swat once again a paradise for its residents.

Led by Inamur Rahman, the lashkar members yelled pro-Army and anti-Taliban slogans and vowed to resist the militants. Moreover, the local leader of the PML-N and nephew of Wali of Swat, Shehryar Amirzeb, who celebrated Eid here, urged the ministers, MNAs and MPAs of the Awami National Party (ANP) to visit the valley to solve the problems of the people instead of sitting in Peshawar.

He said peace has been restored in the valley and now it was the responsibility of the elected representatives of the area to raise voice for the reconstruction and rehabilitation of Swat in their respective assemblies. He said most of the schools and basic health units in the valley had been destroyed, asking the government to speed up its efforts for commencing the process of reconstruction.

Rockefeller Favorites


a project of the Center for Consumer Freedom, provides the public and media with in-depth profiles of anti-consumer activist groups, along with information about the sources of their exorbitant funding.

Despite their innocent-sounding names, many of these organizations are financial Goliaths that use junk science, intimidation tactics, and even threats of violence to push their radical agendas. We’ve analyzed over 500,000 pages of IRS records to bring you a comprehensive snapshot of where their money comes from, tracking more than $800 million to date.

We also offer valuable information about hundreds of deep-pocketed foundations, activist celebrities, and other key players in the movement to control what you eat and drink. To stay in the loop, bookmark ActivistCash.com today



Key Players

| A-L | M-Z |


Rockefeller Brothers Fund


for tax year ending 12/31/2001
Total Assets $684,464,383.00
Grants Awarded $0.00

Officers and Other Supporters
Name Position
Catharine O Broderick Trustee
David J. Callard Trustee
Richard Chasin Trustee
Peggy Dulany Trustee
Jessica P. Einhorn Trustee
Neva R. Goodwin Trustee
Stephen B. Heintz Trustee
Hunter Lewis Trustee
James Moltz Trustee
John Morning Trustee
Robert B. Oxnam Trustee
Joseph A. Pierson Trustee
David Rockefeller Jr. Trustee
Richard Rockefeller Trustee
Steven C. Rockefeller Trustee
Edmond D. Villani Trustee
Frank Wisner Trustee
Tadataka Yamada Trustee

Selected Grants
Grant $200,000.00 in 2002
Source Chronicle Of Philanthropy
Details For its Salmon Aquaculture Clearinghouse, a source of data and scientific information for the news media, conservation advocates, and policy makers
Grant $150,000.00 in 2001
Source Donor’s Website
Details Toward its efforts to support the expansion of sustainable agriculture in China
Environmental Media Services
Grant $120,000.00 in 1995
Source Chronicle Of Philanthropy
Details For the Environmental Media Services project to assist its efforts to educate journalists — grant made via the Tides Foundation

Top Grants Made
Funding To Activist Groups Total Donated Time Frame
Tides Foundation & Tides Center $2,879,900.00 1993 – 2005
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy $2,320,000.00 1995 – 2005
National Environmental Trust $1,950,000.00 1997 – 2002
Natural Resources Defense Council $1,522,510.00 1991 – 2002
Friends of the Earth $1,427,500.00 1994 – 2001
David Suzuki Foundation $1,085,000.00 1998 – 2001
Greenpeace $1,080,000.00 1997 – 2005
Environmental Defense $994,363.00 1993 – 2001
Ocean Conservancy $970,000.00 1997 – 2001
Winrock Int’l Institute for Agricultural Developmt $895,000.00 1995 – 2001
American Oceans Campaign $865,000.00 1996 – 2001
Sierra Club $710,000.00 1995 – 2001
Environmental Media Services $672,000.00 1995 – 2001
Rainforest Action Network $600,000.00 2000 – 2003
World Resources Institute $580,000.00 1993 – 2001
Consumer’s Choice Council $570,000.00 1998 – 2001
Earth Island Institute $562,400.00 1995 – 2001
Environmental Working Group $560,000.00 1990 – 2000
Oceana $550,000.00 2002 – 2006
Wilderness Society $520,000.00 1997 – 2000
U.S. Public Interest Research Group $485,000.00 1998 – 2000
National Wildlife Federation $445,000.00 1993 – 2000
Pesticide Action Network North America $415,000.00 1995 – 2001
Consultative Group on Biological Diversity $411,000.00 1993 – 2002
SeaWeb $410,000.00 1998 – 2002
International Forum on Globalization $390,000.00 1999 – 2003
Redefining Progress $360,000.00 1995 – 2000
Environmental Advocates $325,000.00 1995 – 2001
Public Citizen $305,000.00 1998 – 2002
Conservation International $300,000.00 2000 – 2000
Worldwatch Institute $300,000.00 1996 – 1998
Earth Day Network $250,000.00 1999 – 2000
Physicians for Social Responsibility $200,000.00 2000 – 2000
Union of Concerned Scientists $200,000.00 1995 – 1997
International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Dev $150,000.00 2001 – 2001
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation $145,000.00 1993 – 1999
National Audubon Society $130,025.00 1993 – 2000
World Wildlife Fund $120,015.00 1996 – 2000
Marine Stewardship Council $120,000.00 2001 – 2002
Forest Ethics $120,000.00 2003 – 2003
Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement $90,000.00 2000 – 2000
Biodiversity Action Network $80,000.00 1997 – 1997
Consumers Union of the United States $74,000.00 1993 – 1993
Center for Health, Environment and Justice $70,000.00 2000 – 2000
Public Media Center $66,000.00 2002 – 2002
Institute for Food & Development Policy $60,000.00 1999 – 2001
Environmental Media Association $50,000.00 2001 – 2001
Environmental Research Foundation $50,000.00 1998 – 1998
New York City Environmental Justice Alliance $50,000.00 2001 – 2001
League of Conservation Voters $50,000.00 2000 – 2000
Community Alliance with Family Farmers $40,000.00 2000 – 2000
Izaak Walton League of America $40,000.00 2000 – 2000
Oxfam America $40,000.00 2001 – 2001
Waterkeeper Alliance $35,000.00 2000 – 2001
Foundation on Economic Trends $30,000.00 2000 – 2000
Consumers Association of Penang $30,000.00 2001 – 2001
Resource Renewal Institute $30,000.00 2000 – 2000
Environmental Grantmakers Association $29,475.00 1998 – 2001
Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides $25,000.00 1998 – 1998
New America Foundation $25,000.00 1999 – 1999
Center for Science in the Public Interest $25,000.00 2000 – 2000
Green Seal $25,000.00 1999 – 1999
Center for a New American Dream $25,000.00 2000 – 2000
Rural Advancement Foundation International $20,000.00 1993 – 1993
Friends of the Constitution $15,000.00 2000 – 2000
ACORN $10,000.00 2002 – 2002

Foundations listed on ActivistCash.com may provide funding to a wider variety of nonprofit groups than those profiled here. This website focuses on activist groups that concentrate on food- and beverage-related issues.

Rockefeller Family Fund


for tax year ending 12/31/2002
Total Assets $56,275,707.00
Grants Awarded $0.00

Officers and Other Supporters
Name Position
Anne Bartley President
Clare P. Buden Executive Committee Trustee
Peter Case Trustee
Dana Chasin Vice President
Paul Growald Trustee
David W. Kaiser Trustee
Alida R. Messinger Trustee
Hilda M. Ochoa Finance Committee
Peter M. O’Neill Vice President
Julia S. Robbins Trustee
Richard G. Rockefeller Vice President
Stuart A. Rockefeller Trustee
Wendy Gordon Rockefeller Vice President
Lorn D. Ross Finance Committee
Theodore Spencer Vice President
Geoffrey Strawbridge Trustee
Lucy A. Rockefeller Waletzky Dr. Major Donor
Lulu C. Wang Finance Committee
Lee H. Wasserman Director

Selected Grants
Northern Plains Resource Council
Grant $20,000.00 in 2002
Source IRS Form 990 or 990-PF
Details To defray legal expenses associated with pending appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court [ed. Note: this refers to the case attacking the constitutionality of the Beef Checkoff program]
Center for Science in the Public Interest
Grant $25,000.00 in 2000
Source Foundation Annual Report
Details Support for a public information and policy reform campaign to restrict the overuse of antibiotics in agriculture and medicine.
Foundation on Economic Trends
Grant $40,000.00 in 1998
Source Foundation Annual Report
Details Funding for the Save Organic Standards (SOS) Campaign, which opposes the inclusion of irradiated and genetically engineered foods under the USDA’s organic designation

Top Grants Made
Funding To Activist Groups Total Donated Time Frame
Environmental Media Services $1,325,000.00 1997 – 2002
Tides Foundation & Tides Center $1,225,000.00 1991 – 2004
Environmental Support Center $723,000.00 1994 – 2002
National Environmental Trust $540,000.00 1996 – 2002
League of Conservation Voters $540,000.00 1999 – 2002
Environmental Working Group $505,000.00 2000 – 2003
U.S. Public Interest Research Group $502,000.00 1996 – 2002
Oceana $450,000.00 2004 – 2004
Friends of the Earth $400,000.00 1997 – 2002
Center for Science in the Public Interest $355,000.00 1999 – 2001
World Wildlife Fund $300,000.00 1999 – 2000
Conservation International $300,000.00 2000 – 2000
Foundation on Economic Trends $265,000.00 1998 – 2001
Center for Health, Environment and Justice $260,000.00 1996 – 2001
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities $205,000.00 1996 – 2001
Physicians for Social Responsibility $200,000.00 2000 – 2000
Green Guide Institute $195,000.00 1997 – 1999
Waterkeeper Alliance $160,000.00 1998 – 2002
Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement $160,000.00 2000 – 2002
Sustain $150,000.00 1997 – 2001
Public Citizen $140,000.00 1988 – 2000
Redefining Progress $125,000.00 1998 – 2000
Greenpeace $115,000.00 2002 – 2005
Natural Resources Defense Council $110,000.00 1989 – 1999
Northern Plains Resource Council $110,000.00 2001 – 2003
Sierra Club $105,000.00 1996 – 2002
National Wildlife Federation $100,000.00 2000 – 2000
Environmental Research Foundation $95,000.00 1997 – 1999
Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides $90,000.00 1997 – 1999
Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy $82,500.00 1991 – 2003
Dakota Resource Council $60,000.00 2001 – 2002
Western Colorado Congress $60,000.00 2001 – 2002
Dakota Rural Action $60,000.00 2001 – 2002
Powder River Basin Resource Council $60,000.00 2001 – 2002
Environmental Grantmakers Association $59,835.00 1997 – 2002
Center for a New American Dream $55,000.00 2001 – 2002
Idaho Rural Council $55,000.00 2001 – 2002
Wilderness Society $50,000.00 2000 – 2000
Economic Policy Institute $45,000.00 1998 – 1998
Environmental Advocates $45,000.00 1997 – 2000
Essential Information $45,000.00 1998 – 1998
Earth Day Network $35,000.00 1999 – 1999
Colorado Environmental Coalition $30,000.00 2001 – 2001
National Audubon Society $30,000.00 2000 – 2000
Institute for Environment and Agriculture $25,000.00 1998 – 1998
Oregon Natural Resources Council $25,000.00 1998 – 1998
Southern Environmental Law Center $25,000.00 1997 – 1997
Consumers Union of the United States $25,000.00 1997 – 1997
Children’s Environmental Health Network $25,000.00 1998 – 1998
ACORN $25,000.00 1998 – 1998
American Oceans Campaign $25,000.00 2000 – 2000
Western Organization of Resource Councils $25,000.00 2001 – 2001
Center for Public Interest Research $20,000.00 2002 – 2002
Rocky Mountain Institute $20,000.00 2002 – 2002
Friends of the Constitution $15,000.00 2001 – 2001

Foundations listed on ActivistCash.com may provide funding to a wider variety of nonprofit groups than those profiled here. This website focuses on activist groups that concentrate on food- and beverage-related issues.

Rockefeller Family Fund

The True Evil Doers

[In order for an American resistance movement, or any resistance, to actually challenge the "True Evil Doers," connected with Rockefeller and Rothschild, they must first overcome the political divisions which have been created, that is the hallmark of The Beast network.  Republicans and Democrats, capitalists and communists, right and left, Heritage Foundation and MoveOn...these are not natural divisions, they are bi-products of manipulation, created to keep us from uniting against them. Always operating on the principle of the Hegelian dialectic, they promote opposites, always intending to achieve a "compromise" or "synthesis" between them.   The monsters sow division among the unwary normal folk.

The left/progressives fight the evil of the right/conservatives, never stopping to realize that it was the conservative press that first sounded the alarm about the Rock/Roth conspiracy.  (SEE: Antony Sutton)  We the People have been deceived into hating our neighbors, instead of hating the inhuman authors of our hatred.  Both left and right fight against the many ongoing wrongs of the current administration as a patriotic expression of dissent.  We fight the "other" because we feel that they are destroying our Nation.  This is what "they" want.   To defeat "them," we must come together.


The True Evil Doers

By this method, the trillionaire masters of the universe remain hidden whilst Forbes magazine poses lower ranking billionaires like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett as the richest men in the World. Retired management consultant Gaylon Ross Sr, author of Who’s Who of the Global Elite, has been tipped from a private source that the combined wealth of the Rockefeller family in 1998 was approx (US) $11 trillion and the Rothschilds (U.S.) $100 trillion. However something of an insider’s knowledge of the hidden wealth of the elite is contained in the article, “Will the Dollar and America Fall Down on August 19?..” on page 1 of the 12th July 2001 issue of Russian newspaper Pravda. The newspaper interviewed Tatyana Koryagina, a senior research fellow in the Institute of Macroeconomic Researches subordinated to the Russian Ministry of Economic Development (Minekonom) on the subject of a recent conference concerning the fate of the U.S. economy:

posted to WPA June 28, 2009

“Money is power or shall we say, the monopoly to create credit money and charge interest is absolute power” : Alex James

“Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws”: Amschel Bauer Mayer Rothschild, 1838

Letter written from London by the Rothschilds to their New York agents introducing their banking method into America: “The few who can understand the system will be either so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class, while, on the other hand, that great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that Capital derives from the system, will bear its burden without complaint and, perhaps, without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.”

Nathan Rothschild said to the Commons Secret Committee on the question early in 1819: “In what line of business are you? – Mostly in the foreign banking line. “Have the goodness to state to the Committee in detail, what you conceive would be the consequence of an obligation imposed upon the Bank [of England, which he owned] to resume cash payments at the expiration of a year from the present time? – I do not think it can be done without very great distress to this country; it would do a great deal of mischief; we may not actually know ourselves what mischief it might cause. “Have the goodness to explain the nature of the mischief, and in what way it would be produced? – Money will be so very scarce, every article in this country will fall to such an enormous extent, that many persons will be ruined.”

The director of the Prussian Treasury wrote on a visit to London that Nathan Rothschild had as early as 1817: “.., incredible influence upon all financial affairs here in London. It is widely stated.., that he entirely regulates the rate of exchange in the City. His power as a banker is enormous”.

Austrian Prince Mettemich’s secretary wrote of the Rothschilds, as early as 1818, that: “… they are the richest people in Europe.”

Referring to James Rothschild, the poet Heinrich Heine said: “Money is the god of our times, and Rothschild is his prophet.”

James Rothschild built his fabulous mansion, called Ferrilres, 19 miles north-east of Paris. Wilhelm I, on first seeing it, exclaimed: “Kings couldn’t afford this. It could only belong to a Rothschild!”

Author Frederic Morton wrote that the Rothschilds had: “conquered the World more thoroughly, more cunningly, and much more lastingly than all the Caesars before…”

As Napoleon pointed out: “Terrorism, War & Bankruptcy are caused by the privatization of money, issued as a debt and compounded by interest “- he cancelled debt and interest in France – hence the Battle of Waterloo.

Some writers have claimed that Nathan Rothschild “warned that the United States would find itself involved in a most disastrous war if the bank’s charter were not renewed.” (do you see the similarities here? If you don’t play the game an economic disaster will fall on you and you will be destroyed.)

“There is but one power in Europe and that is Rothschild.” 19th century French commentator.

Lord Rothschild (Rockefellers and Rothschilds’ relatives) in his book The Shadow of a Great Man quotes a letter sent from Davidson on June 24, 1814 to Nathan Rothschild, “As long as a house is like yours, and as long as you work together with your brothers, not a house in the world will be able to compete with you, to cause you harm or to take advantage of you, for together you can undertake and perform more than any house in the world.” The closeness of the Rothschild brothers is seen in a letter from Soloman (Salmon) Rothschild to his brother Nathan on Feb. 28, 1815, “We are like the mechanism of a watch: each part is essential.” (2) This closeness is further seen in that of the 18 marriages made by Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s grandchildren – 16 were contracted between first cousins.

“Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.” The Communist Manifesto. In the case of the Bolshevik revolution, Rothschilds/ Rockefellers’ Chase Bank owned the state. In the US, the FED owners “own” the state.

Rothschilds’ favorite saying who along with the Rockefellers are the major Illuminati Banking Dynasties: “Who controls the issuance of money controls the government!”

Nathan Rothschild said (1777-1836): “I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply.”

Rockefeller is reported to have said: “Competition is a sin”. “Own nothing. Control everything”. Because he wants to centralize control of everything and enslave us all, i.e. the modern Nimrod or Pharaoh.

The Rothschild were behind the colonization and occupations of India and the Rothschild owned British Petroleum was granted unlimited rights to all offshore Indian oil, which is still valid till this day.

“Give me the control of the credit of a nation, and I care not who makes the laws.” The famous boastful statement of Nathaniel Meyer Rothschild, speaking to a group of international bankers, 1912: “The few who could understand the system (cheque, money, credits) will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours, that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.” The boastful statement by Rothschild Bros. of London.

These people are the top masterminds and conspired for the creation of illegal FEDERAL RESERVE BANK in 1913: Theodore Roosevelt, Paul Warburg – Representative Of Rothschild, Woodrow Wilson – U.S. President Signed FED Into Act, Nelson W. Aldrich – Representative Of Rockefeller, Benjamin Strong – Representative Of Rockefeller, Frank A. Vanderlip – Representative Of Rockefeller, John D. Rockefeller – Rockefeller Himself, Henry Davison – Representative Of J. P. Morgan, Charles Norton – Representative Of J. P. Morgan.

In the last century, members of the British Fabian Society dynastic banking families in the City of London financed the Communist takeover of Russia. Trotsky in his biography refers to some of the loans from these British financiers going back as far as 1907. By 1917 the major subsidies and funding for the Bolshevik Revolution were co-ordinated and arranged by Sir George Buchanan and Lord Alfred Milner. [no doubt using money from Cecil Rhodes' South African gold and diamond legacy - Ed] The Communist system in Russia was a “British experiment” designed ultimately to become the Fabian Socialist model for the British takeover of the World through the UN and EU. The British plan to takeover the World and bring in a “New World Order” began with the teachings of John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes at Oxford University. Rhodes in one of his wills in 1877 left his vast fortune to Lord Nathan Rothschild as trustee to set up the Rhodes Scholarship Program at Oxford to indoctrinate promising young graduates for the purpose, and also establish a secret society [Royal Institute of International Affairs RIIA, which branched into the Round Table, the Bilderbergers, the CFR, the Trilateral, etc -- Ed] for leading business and banking leaders around the World who would work for the City to bring in their Socialist World government.

Rothschild appointed Lord Alfred Milner to implement the plan.

Benjamin Freedman (Friedman) said this in 1961, Washington (he was a millionaire insider in international Zionist organizations, friend to 4 US presidents, and was also part of the 117-man strong Zionist delegation at the signing of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 where Germany was forced into bankruptcy to the Zionist BankLords and social chaos): “Two years into WW1, Germany, which was then winning the war, offered Britain and France a negotiated peace deal, but German Zionist groups seeing the opportunity made a deal with Britain to get the United States into the war if Britain promised to give the Zionists Palestine.”

In other words, they made this deal: “We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay us is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.” They made that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that — I don’t know how many here remember it — the United States, which was almost totally pro-German because the newspapers and mass communications media here were controlled by the Zionist bankers who owned the major commercial banks and the 12 Federal Reserve Banks (the original Stockholders of the Federal Reserve Banks in 1913 were the Rockefeller’ s, JP Morgan, Rothschild’s, Lazard Freres, Schoellkopf, Kuhn-Loeb, Warburgs, Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs, all with roots in Germany’s Zionists like the British Royal family, J.P. Morgan, Carnegie, Bush, Rumsfeld, Clintons, the Nazis that were brought into the CIA, etc. http://land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/federal_reserve.shtml ) and they were pro-German because they wanted to use Germany to destroy the Czar of Russia and let the Communists whom they funded take over. The German Zionist bankers — Rothschilds, Rockefeller, Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one dollar. They stood aside and they said: “As long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one cent!” They poured money into Germany, fighting with Germany against Russia, to lick the Czarist regime. The newspapers had been all pro-German, where they’d been telling the people of the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects, then after making the deal with the British for Palestine, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were cutting off babies’ hands. And they were no good. The Zionists in London sent cables to the US, to Justice Brandeis: “Go to work on President Wilson. We’re getting from England what we want. Now you go to work, and you go to work on President Wilson and get the US into the war.” And that did happen. Shortly after President Woodrow Wilson declared war on Germany.

The power of the Rothschild family was evidenced on 24 Sept 2002 when a helicopter touched down on the lawn of Waddedson Manor, their ancestral home in Buckinghamshire, England. Out of the helicopter strode Warren Buffet, – touted as the second richest man in the World but really a lower ranking player- and Arnold Schwarzenegger (the gropinator), at that time a candidate for the Governorship of California. Also in attendance at this two day meeting of the World’s most powerful businessmen and financiers hosted by Jacob Rothschild were James Wolfensohn, president of the World Bank and Nicky Oppenheimer, chairman of De Beers. Arnold went on to secure the governorship of one of the biggest economies on the planet a year later. That he was initiated into the ruling class in the Rothschilds’ English country manor suggests that the centre of gravity of the three hundred trillion dollar cartel is in the U.K. and Europe not the U.S.

A recent article in the London Financial Times indicates why it is impossible to gain an accurate estimate of the wealth of the trillionaire bankers. Discussing the sale of Evelyn Rothschild’s stake in Rothschild Continuation Holdings, it states: …[this] requires agreement on the valuation of privately held assets whose value has never been tested in a public market. Most of these assets are held in a complex network of tax-efficient structures around the World.

Queen Elizabeth II’s shareholdings remain hidden behind Bank of England Nominee accounts. The Guardian newspaper reported in May 2002 … “the reason for the wild variations in valuations of her private wealth can be pinned on the secrecy over her portfolio of share investments. This is because her subjects have no way of knowing through a public register of interests where she, as their head of state, chooses to invest her money. Unlike the members of the Commons and now the Lords, the Queen does not have to annually declare her interests and as a result her subjects cannot question her or know about potential conflicts of interests…” In fact, the Queen even has an extra mechanism to ensure that her investments remain secret – a nominee company called the Bank of England Nominees. It has been available for decades to the entire World’s current heads of state to allow them anonymity when buying shares. Therefore, when a company publishes a share register and the Bank of England Nominees is listed, it is not possible to gauge whether the Queen, President Bush or even Saddam Hussein is the true shareholder.

By this method, the trillionaire masters of the universe remain hidden whilst Forbes magazine poses lower ranking billionaires like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett as the richest men in the World. Retired management consultant Gaylon Ross Sr, author of Who’s Who of the Global Elite, has been tipped from a private source that the combined wealth of the Rockefeller family in 1998 was approx (US) $11 trillion and the Rothschilds (U.S.) $100 trillion. However something of an insider’s knowledge of the hidden wealth of the elite is contained in the article, “Will the Dollar and America Fall Down on August 19?..” on page 1 of the 12th July 2001 issue of Russian newspaper Pravda. The newspaper interviewed Tatyana Koryagina, a senior research fellow in the Institute of Macroeconomic Researches subordinated to the Russian Ministry of Economic Development (Minekonom) on the subject of a recent conference concerning the fate of the U.S. economy:

Koryagina: The known history of civilization is merely the visible part of the iceberg. There is a shadow economy, shadow politics and also a shadow history, known to conspirologists. There are [unseen] forces acting in the World, unstoppable for [most powerful] countries and even continents.

Ashley Mote (EU): “Mr President, I wish to draw your attention to the Global Security Fund, set up in the early 1990s under the auspices of Jacob Rothschild. This is a Brussels-based fund and it is no ordinary fund: it does not trade, it is not listed and it has a totally different purpose. It is being used for geopolitical engineering purposes, apparently under the guidance of the intelligence services.” “I have previously asked about the alleged involvement of the European Union’s own intelligence resources in the management of slush funds in offshore accounts, and I still await a reply. To that question I now add another: what are the European Union’s connections to the Global Security Fund and what relationship does it have with European Union institutions? “Recently, Ashley Mote of the European Union (EU) asked this volatile question in a public EU meeting, a question never answered, as Mr. Mote, merely by asking this question, was immediately scratched from the White House Christmas card list and placed on its top ten hit list. The Illuminati’s cash cow, grazing freely on the World wide pasture of greenbacks, isn’t called “Elsie” but instead is called the Global Security Fund, a name actually meaning in the secret cult’s language Global Terrorist Fund. In simple terms, it’s a gigantic illegal trust fund, estimated by undercover overseas financial investigators at 65 trillion dollars, set-up for “Illuminati rainy days” and established when it is desperately needed in a pinch for bribery, assassinations and sponsoring World wide terrorist activities to divert attention from their banking mafia. Although the fund is cloaked in secrecy and made possible by the Western civilization’ s Federal Reserve banking system, investigators trying to pry into the Illuminati’s secret treasure trove have uncovered some interesting facts.


Ousted Honduran President Claims Attack by Radiation Weapon

Ousted Honduran President: Israelis Sent to Kill Me

Readers Number : 98

25/09/2009 Ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya, who returned to his country this week after three months in exile, is accusing his government of hiring Israeli mercenaries to torture him with high-frequency radiation in his safe haven in the Brazilian Embassy.

In a conversation with the Miami Herald, Zelaya said that he has begun to suffer from throat pains resulting from poisonous gases being leaked into the embassy in Tegucigalpa. He also said that he fears mercenaries will enter the building and murder him. “They are threatening to kill us,” he said.

Witnesses said that soldiers were noticed installing some kind of satellite in front of the embassy on Friday that emitted loud noises.

Israeli sources in Miami whom the newspaper contacted said that they cannot confirm the presence of Israeli mercenaries in Honduras.

Zelaya, who was deposed in a military coup in June, also said, “I prefer to walk on my own two feet than to live on my knees under a dictatorship.” He turned to the American administration with a request to take action in his favor. “I said to President Obama, to Secretary of State Clinton, to the US ambassador, and to anyone willing to listen: they know what to do, but have been very cautious until now.”

The de facto Honduran government announced Wednesday that it will initiate talks with Zelaya if he recognizes the election results that were held in the country in November.

“I am ready to meet with anyone, anywhere, including former President Manuel Zelaya,” said the interim President Roberto Micheletti. This statement represents a significant change in the president’s position, as he previously declared he did not intend to be drawn into conflict with Brazil and that Zelaya “can stay in the embassy five to 10 years if he wants.”

Jihad in Pakistan’s South Punjab

[Look's like a biker rally]

Jihad in Pakistan’s South Punjab

By Bill RoggioSeptember 24, 2009 1:07 PM


Newsline has a must-read article on the critical role the southern half of Pakistan’s Punjab province plays in the jihadi network. Read the whole thing; I’ve excerpted some interesting portions below:

Four major militant outfits, the Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP), Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ), Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Tayyaba (LeT), are all comfortably ensconced in South Punjab (see article “Brothers in Arms”). Sources claim that there are about 5,000 to 9,000 youth from South Punjab fighting in Afghanistan and Waziristan. A renowned Pakistani researcher, Hassan Abbas cites a figure of 2,000 youth engaged in Waziristan. The area has become critical to planning, recruitment and logistical support for terrorist attacks in Pakistan and Afghanistan. In fact, in his study on the Punjabi Taliban, Abbas has quoted Tariq Pervez, the chief of a new government outfit named the National Counter-Terrorism Authority (NCTA), as saying that the jihad veterans in South Punjab are instrumental in providing the foot soldiers and implementing terror plans conceived and funded mainly by Al-Qaeda operatives. This shouldn’t come as a surprise considering that the force that conquered Khost in 1988-89 comprised numerous South Punjabi commanders who fought for the armies of various Afghan warlords such as Gulbuddin Hikmatyar and Burhanuddin Rabbani. Even now, all the four major organisations are involved in Afghanistan.

The article explains the important function the Punjabi madrassas, or religious seminaries, serve in fueling the jihad; and the article also throws light on state support for jihadi organizations. The author claims, for example, that truckloads of weapons have been delivered to the headquarters of the radical, al Qaeda-allied Jaish-e-Mohammed:

The number of seminaries had increased during and after the 1980s. According to a 1996 report, there were 883 madrassas in Bahawalpur, 361 in Dera Ghazi Khan, 325 in Multan and 149 in Sargodha district. The madrassas in Bahawalpur outnumbered all other cities, including Lahore. These numbers relate to Deobandi madrassas only and do not include the Ahl-e-Hadith, Barelvi and other sects. Newer estimates from the intelligence bureau for 2008 show approximately 1,383 madrassas in the Bahawalpur division that house 84,000 students. Although the highest number of madrassas is in Rahim Yar Khan district (559) followed by Bahawalpur (481) and Bahawalnagar (310), it is Bahawalpur in which the highest number of students (36,000) is enlisted. The total number of madrassa students in Pakistan has reached about one million.Everyone has been so focused on FATA and the NWFP that they failed to notice the huge increase in religious seminaries in these districts of South Punjab. According to a study conducted by historian Tahir Kamran, the total number of madrassas in the Punjab rose from 1,320 in 1988 to 3,153 in 2000, an increase of almost 140%. These madrassas were meant to provide a rapid supply of jihadis to the Afghan war of the 1980s. At the time of 9/11, the Bahawalpur division alone could boast of approximately 15,000-20,000 trained militants, some of whom had resettled in their areas during the period that Musharraf claimed to have clamped down on the jihad industry. Many went into the education sector, opened private schools and even joined the media.

These madrassas play three essential roles. First, they convert people to Salafism and neutralise resistance to a more rabid interpretation of the Quran and Sunnah in society. Consequently, the majority of the Barelvis cannot present a logical resistance to the opposing ideology. In many instances, the Barelvis themselves get converted to the idea of jihad. Secondly, these madrassas are used to train youth, who are then inducted into jihad. Most of the foot soldiers come from the religious seminaries. One of the principles taught to the students pertains to the concept of jihad as being a sacred duty that has to continue until the end of a Muslim’s life or the end of the world. Lastly, madrassas are an essential transit point for the youth, who are recruited from government schools. They are usually put through the conversion process after they have attended a 21-day initial training programme in the Frontier province or Kashmir (see box “A Different Breed”).

State support, which follows two distinct tracks, is also instrumental in the growth of jihadism in this region. On the one hand, there has generally been a link or understanding between political parties and militant groups. Since political parties are unable to eliminate militants or most politicians are sympathetic towards the militants, they tend to curb their activities through political deal-making. The understanding between the SSP and Benazir Bhutto after the 1993 elections, or the alleged deal between the PML-N and the SSP during the 2008 elections, denote the relationship between major political parties and the jihadis. Currently, the SSP in South Punjab is more supportive of the PML-N.

The second track involves operational links between the outfits and the state’s intelligence apparatus. As mentioned earlier, some of the outfits claim to have received training from the country’s intelligence agencies. Even now, local people talk of truckloads of weapons arriving at the doorstep of the JeM headquarters and other sites in the middle of the night. While official sources continue to claim that the outfit was banned and does not exist, or that Masood Azhar is on the run from his hometown of Bahawalpur, the facts prove otherwise. For instance, the outfit continues to acquire real estate in the area, such as a new site near Chowk Azam in Bahawalpur, which many believe is being used as a training site. Although the new police chief has put restraints on the JeM and disallowed it from constructing on the site, the outfit continues to appropriate more land around the area. Junior police officials even claim seeing tunnels being dug inside the premises. The new facility is on the bank of the Lahore-Karachi national highway, which means that in the event of a crisis, the JeM could block the road as has happened in Kohat and elsewhere. Furthermore, the outfit’s main headquarters in the city is guarded by AK-47-armed men who harass any journalist trying to take a photograph of the building. In one instance, even a police official was shooed away and later intimidated by spooks of an intelligence agency for spying on the outfit. Despite the claim that the SSP, the LeJ and the JeM have broken ties with intelligence agencies and are now fighting the army in Waziristan, the fact remains that their presence in the towns of South Punjab continues unhindered.

Obama’s AfPak metrics miss the mark on Pakistan

Obama’s AfPak metrics miss the mark on Pakistan

Obama’s AfPak metrics miss the mark on Pakistan
By Hassan Abbas, AfPak Channel at FP, September 21, 2009

The draft metrics devised by the Obama administration to evaluate progress in the AfPak theater, while providing a useful list of issues to follow, analyze and gauge the developing situation in Afghanistan, leaves much to be desired in its treatment of the Pakistan side of things. The informed and constructive analysis of said metrics by Steve Coll and Katherine Tiedemann in this forum are must reads to understand the context of this discussion. I almost entirely agree with their assessments but believe that a few additional lacunas in the document must be addressed. Of course, not having access to the ‘classified annex’ (regarding Objective 1: disruption and degradation of terrorist networks and their capability in Afghanistan and Pakistan) limits one’s ability to grade the overall effort (if you may)!

It is quite striking that framers of the metrics have avoided the merest mention of Pakistan-India relations as a factor in understanding which way the wind is blowing in Pakistan’s security environment. While the Obama administration has every right to wish that Pakistan delink its rivalry with India in the Kashmir region from its policy towards Afghanistan (and consequently in Federally Administered Tribal Areas), one cannot ignore the prevailing ground realities. Rather than continuing to evade the relevance of the India factor to AfPak theater, the Obama administration must energetically facilitate and monitor the India-Pakistan peace process (which is lately showing some signs of life courtesy resumption of back channel diplomacy).

The second omission (less glaring than the above) relates to the reform and capacity building of Pakistan’s law enforcement and police. This issue is mentioned in the metrics in general, I must admit, but it is lumped together with the ‘effectiveness’ of intelligence and military counterinsurgency operations, which amounts to minimizing the critical nature of the issue. The Bush-era policy of overwhelming emphasis on ‘military action’ reduced the importance of devising ‘law enforcement’ strategies. Indeed, for Pakistan, the success of this spring’s military campaign against the Taliban and al Qaeda in the FATA and the Swat Valley should not be underestimated, but the country’s investment in police reform and the overhaul of the criminal justice system are more crucial for nabbing and prosecuting extremists in South Punjab, for instance. Whether or not Pakistan moves in this direction by taking significant reform-oriented steps should be followed closely.

While pursuing “an enduring, strategic partnership” with Pakistan is a laudable goal, it can be achieved only when Pakistani public perceptions about the U.S. improve. As recent polls indicate, an increasing number of Pakistanis view the United States as the greatest threat to their country. Hence, gauging American image in Pakistan can be a useful barometer, and effective targeting of the forthcoming U.S. development aid (which is mentioned in the metrics) can potentially start turning the tide in favor of the U.S..

Finally, the list mentions performance and stability of Pakistan’s civilian government and aptly links the stability factor with ‘military involvement’ in governmental affairs. However, this is something that is also dependent on how the Obama administration approaches its relationship with Pakistan. While it is expedient for the U.S. to engage all power centers in Pakistan, it must be recognized that civilian authority in Pakistan will be strengthened when the U.S. government also directs all its communications and links with the country through what in Pakistan is called the ‘proper channel,’ which in this case implies talking to the highest political office first and routing all communication, even about defense issues, through the foreign office and civilian leadership. Moreover, transition from military to civilian rule is a process that takes years and given the influence, resources and past role of the army, it will likely continue to play a crucial role in defining Pakistan’s policy towards regional security issues.

Hassan Abbas is a Bernard Schwartz fellow at the Asia Society and senior advisor at the Belfer Center, Harvard Kennedy School. He is also the author of Pakistan’s Drift into Extremism.

Americans Tilt Against Sending More Troops to Afghanistan

Americans Tilt Against Sending More Troops to Afghanistan

Most who oppose also advocate that the U.S. begin to withdraw troops

by Frank Newport

PRINCETON, NJ — Americans are more likely to say they would oppose (50%) rather than favor (41%) a possible decision by President Barack Obama to send more U.S. troops to Afghanistan.

Views on a Possible Decision by President Obama to Send More Troops to Afghanistan

The possibility that Obama will need to make a decision on U.S. troop strength in Afghanistan has increased in recent weeks, amid reports that the senior American military commander in Afghanistan — Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal — is preparing to deliver a formal request for additional troops in Afghanistan, perhaps by the end of this week.

“The data indicate that Republicans do seem willing to support Obama should he make a decision to increase U.S. troop strength in Afghanistan. On the other hand, Democrats seem willing to oppose Obama in this case.”

This follows the recent news leak of McChrystal’s assessment of the situation in Afghanistan, including his conclusion that more troops are needed in order to avoid failure in the war. Queried about the possibility of increasing U.S. forces in Afghanistan, President Obama said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that he will “have to ask some very hard questions anytime I send our troops in.”

Questions on Afghanistan were included in Gallup’s Sept. 22-23 Daily tracking, and were focused on the public’s reaction if Obama does make a decision to send more troops to Afghanistan at some point in the near future.

The 50% of Americans who oppose a troop increase were asked whether they favored keeping troops at the current level, or whether they favored beginning a withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. By an overwhelming 82% to 14% margin, those opposed to a troop increase say they favor withdrawal over keeping the status quo.

This leaves the overall disposition of Americans on the issue of troops in Afghanistan that is seen in the accompanying graph. Notably, as many Americans overall favor withdrawing troops from the country (41%) as favor increasing troop levels (41%).

Support for/Opposition to Sending More Troops to Afghanistan, and Support for Troop Withdrawal

The Afghanistan situation creates an unusual set of political cross-currents. A Republican president (George W. Bush) initiated the movement of U.S. troops to Afghanistan in 2001, and Republicans in general have been more supportive than Democrats of the Afghanistan war. If Obama does make a decision to send more troops, Republicans would be faced with the prospect of supporting a Democratic president’s decision to initiate a policy they favor, while Democrats who oppose further escalation in Afghanistan would be faced with going against a president representing their own party.

The data indicate that Republicans do seem willing to support Obama should he make a decision to increase U.S. troop strength in Afghanistan. On the other hand, Democrats seem willing to oppose Obama in this case. Independents are also on the opposition side of the ledger.

Views on Sending More U.S. Troops to Afghanistan, by Party ID

Bottom Line

President Obama will by all accounts face a difficult choice regarding Afghanistan in the weeks ahead.

Gen. McChrystal — whom Obama’s administration appointed to Afghanistan earlier this year — has already indicated that he is likely to request more troops for that country. Should Obama turn down such a request, he risks the ire of Republicans and others who will most likely argue that he is ignoring the wishes of his commanders on the ground, and making a mistake that could result in an increased risk of terrorism, among other things. Should he agree to order more troops, he will go against the wishes of the broad U.S. population — and, in particular, the rank-and-file of his own party, which at the moment is more opposed to than in favor of such an action.

Survey Methods

Results are based on telephone interviews with 1,053 national adults, aged 18 and older, conducted Sept. 22-23, 2009, as part of Gallup Daily tracking. For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.

Interviews are conducted with respondents on land-line telephones and cellular phones.

In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

Iran Admits to Having Second Undiscovered Enrichment Site’

President Ahmadinejad visiting the Natanz uranium enrichment facilities 9.4.08

The Natanz enrichment plant is being monitored by the IAEA

Iran has revealed to the UN nuclear watchdog the existence of a second uranium enrichment plant, reports say.

Tehran made the announcement in a letter to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Mohammed ElBaradei, sources are quoted as saying.

Iran has previously acknowledged it has one enrichment plant at Natanz, which IAEA inspectors are monitoring.

If confirmed, the reports will stoke fears that Iran is closer than thought to building a nuclear bomb.

The Iranian authorities have always insisted their nuclear programme is for peaceful means.

But the US and other Western nations fear Tehran is planning to develop an atomic weapon.

Iran is supposed to have stopped all enrichment under threat of sanctions from the UN Security Council.

News of the Iranian letter comes days before Iran is due to enter fresh talks over its controversial nuclear programme.

‘Comprehensive’ talks

Diplomats close to the IAEA said Mr ElBaradei received the letter from Iran earlier this week, the Associated Press and Reuters reports.

Officials speaking to the AP said the letter contained no details about the location of the second facility, when it had started operations or the type and number of centrifuges it was running.

Speaking to the BBC, the IAEA would neither confirm nor deny the reports, saying only that it was taking a serious look at the information.

This development, if confirmed, will encourage fears that Iran has other secret facilities that could be used to make a nuclear bomb, the BBC’s Tehran correspondent, Jon Leyne, says in London.

Natanz, some 250km (150 miles) south of Tehran, had been kept secret until its existence was revealed by exiled groups several years ago, he adds.

Iran has been under months of pressure to accept US President Barack Obama’s offer of talks on its nuclear ambitions.

Earlier this month, Tehran agreed to “comprehensive” talks on a range of security issues – but made no mention of its own nuclear programme.

The talks are due to be held in Geneva on 1 October with Tehran and the five permanent UN Security Council members – US, UK, Russia, China and France – plus Germany.

Russia has signalled it might be prepared to soften its opposition to further sanctions against Iran, although China has said such pressure wound not be effective.

Boycott Boston Hyatt–Unfair Labor Practices

Please spread the word that people need to avoid Hyatt. In addition, feel free to inform Amy Grasso, whose contact information is located below, that you are urging others to boycott Hyatt until the time that the unjustly treated workers are reinstated.

Attention to:
Jilean Chandler [Hyatt Hotel Consumer Affairs
Ph: (800) 323-7249, Ext: 3445] and
Amy Grasso, (Marketing Coordinator
Hyatt Regency Boston
One Avenue de Lafayette
Boston, MA 02111
Tel: 617-422-5542
Dear Jilean Chandler and Amy Grasso,
Thanks to the internet and other widely effective quick communication platforms, word is rapidly spreading around the world regarding your company’s actions with the housekeepers in Boston, Massachusetts. So if your company’s directors thought that it would be a successful cost cutting measure to fire the housekeeping staff members after these workers were forced to train their replacements as supposed vacation fill-ins, upper management will have to think through the whole matter once again.
Frankly, this callous unethical Boston fiasco is reminiscent of the many times that union busting activities were carried out in the past with SCAB labor. In this case, your outsourcing company serves the ugly role. Moreover, this is exactly the type of behavior that Americans and people of other nationalities all across the world will no longer support. We are NOT indifferent, nor apathetic.
Meanwhile, anyone who erroneously thinks that global boycotts cannot make a difference should recall the many prior successful ones that have been carried out to date and fresh ones happening right now. For example:
Extremely Successful Boycotts through history…. – Democratic … http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boycott …. It was not really successful as far as bringing about its goals, but did get convince many …

www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph... – 82k – Similar pages

What was the effect or accomplishments of the Montgomery Bus …

A prime example was the successful boycott of service stations in Mississippi for …. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_… 3 years ago. 33% 2 Votes …

answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070219155... – 43k – Similar pages

boycott (of South Africa) Social and commercial isolation of South Africa by individuals, organizations, and national governments protesting against South Africa’s apartheid system.

www.tiscali.co.uk/reference/encyclopaedia/hutchi... – 52k – Similar pages

South Africa’s largest trade union seeks to boycott Israel … South Africa’s largest trade union seeks to boycott Israel -News and commentary relating to events in Israel, the occupied territories, and the world, …

www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/865408.html – 254k – Similar pages

Nestlé boycott – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Nestlé boycott is a boycott launched on July 4, 1977, in the United States against the Swiss based Nestlé corporation. It spread quickly throughout the …

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nestl%C3%A9_boycott – 69k – Similar pages

Safe Food Now Consumers reject GM food, demand Nestlé India go GM free. … A bunch of senior citizens together with Greenpeace decided to tell a very strange tale. … Remember Europe boycotted your Baby foods to bring you to your knees. Now India …

greenpeace.in/safefood/ – 94k – Similar pages

MetroActive News & Issues | Nike Boycott

Two weeks ago, a letter signed by 41 members of the House showed up on Phil … Even The New York Times’ Herbert acknowledges that Nike may be unfairly …

www.metroactive.com/papers/sonoma/12.11.97/nike-... – 19k – Similar pages

BoycottWikipedia, the free encyclopedia For example, the mid and late 20th century academic boycotts of South Africa in protest of apartheid practices and the less successful but more recent …

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boycott – 47k – Similar pages

Once CREDO (Working Assets), which served as one of the spearheads for the Nike boycott, and other groups oriented towards social activism get wind of your company’s activities, your upper management will see the degree that your actions in Boston actually saved money for your company. However, an alternative to facing this pending financial loss would be, obviously, to immediately reinstate the fired housekeepers.

09/04/2009 – 9:06am
March and Rally for Jobs and a Real Economic Recovery
Across Massachusetts jobs are being cut and thousands of workers laid off.
Profitable companies like Verizon are using the current recession as an excuse to cut jobs. Universities and hospitals with fat endowments are making cuts. Long overdue construction on state infrastructure is stalled or moving too slowly. State and local government are slashing critical public services and eliminating jobs — just when we should be expanding them. Those of us still working are just one paycheck away from a pink slip.
One year after the federal government gave big business and the banks hundreds of billions of dollars for the bail out, corporations aren’t creating the jobs that were promised.
We need jobs and we want to work. Let’s put the heat on corporations doing business in Massachusetts to provide the good jobs our communities need!
Join the fight against this jobless recovery and for an economy that works for everyone.  Massive labor march & rally:
Thursday, October 1, 2009

4:00 PM    Kickoff at the State House
4:30 PM    March through downtown and the Financial District (We will stop at 185 Franklin St)
5:30 PM    Rally at the Federal Reserve Bank
Buses are being reserved from across the state. Motorcycle ride-ins to the rally are planned.


We’d like to invite all of our veterans to march together.  Please call the office @617-929-6000 to add your name to the list of veterans.  For more info contact Steve Smith 978-302-3690

09/19/2009 – 1:38pm

When the housekeepers at the three Hyatt hotels in the Boston area were asked to train some new workers, they said they were told the trainees would be filling in during vacations.

On Aug. 31, staffers learned the full story: None of them would be making the beds and cleaning the showers any longer. All of them were losing their jobs. The trainees, it turns out, were employees of a Georgia company, Hospitality Staffing Solutions, who were replacing them that day.

The move to outsource the jobs of about 100 housekeeping employees at the Hyatt Regency Boston, Hyatt Regency Cambridge, and Hyatt Harborside at Logan International Airport is unusual in the hospitality industry, which counts on the housekeeping staff to help make sure hotel guests are comfortable.

“It’s unbelievable,’’ said Lucine Williams, 41, who has worked at the Hyatt Regency Boston for nearly 22 years and was making $15.32 an hour plus health, dental, and 401(k) benefits when she lost her job. “I don’t know how they can treat people like that.’’

Not only did the Hyatt betray the trust and loyalty of its former employees, but it ostensibly supports a company that underpays and provides no benefits to its workforce. Particularly in these economic times, this sort of business decision does far more harm than good to the local economy and to the people who have given so much of themselves to the company for so long. The Hyatt website includes a section dedicated to its commitment to social responsibility, and this quote: “At Hyatt, we’re committed to making a positive and lasting impact in every community in which we operate.’’ A lasting impact they may make, but how driving a workforce into unemployment is positive is beyond me.

After hearing the news at meetings last month, employees cried and screamed, said Drupattie Jungra, 55, who had worked at the Cambridge Hyatt for more than 21 years and made $15.69 an hour, plus benefits.

Until Hyatt reverses this action we should all boycott Hyatt hotels.

Tell Hyatt what you think:
Jilean Chandler, Hyatt Hotel Consumer Affairs
Ph: (800) 323-7249, Ext: 3445

Hyatt Regency Boston
Amy Grasso, Marketing Coordinator
One Avenue de Lafayette
Boston, MA 02111
Tel: 617-422-5542

Gov. Patrick Threatens To Boycott Hyatt

Published September 23, 2009  Updated September 24

BOSTON — Gov. Deval Patrick is threatening to stop using Hyatt hotels for state employee travel, unless the chain reinstates nearly 100 housekeepers it laid off from its three Boston-area hotels.

Some of the housekeepers had worked for Hyatt for as long as 25 years and made up to $15 an hour. The hotel company discharged the housekeepers at the end of August and replaced them with workers from a Georgia-based staffing firm who get far fewer benefits and earn less – $8 an hour.

Governor Deval Patrick listens to the stories of housekeepers laid off from work at Hyatt's three Boston-area locations.  The governor is threating a state goverment boycott of Hyatt unless the housekeepers are reinstated.  (Curt Nickisch/WBUR) Gov. Deval Patrick listens Wednesday night to the stories of housekeepers laid off from work at Hyatt’s three Boston-area locations. (Curt Nickisch/WBUR)

In a letter to the Hyatt CEO, Patrick accused the hotel chain of unceremoniously tossing out the workers to fend for themselves, and of paying barely livable wages to the new workers.

On Wednesday night, some of the discharged housekeepers met with Gov. Patrick. They told him that despite Hyatt’s denials, they had been forced to train their replacements.

Patrick said he understands that businesses have to make tough decisions in this economy, but that Hyatt’s move was unconscionable.

“If they must take this path, there’s a right way and a wrong way to do it,” Patrick said. “They’ve done it in an exceedingly wrong way. And it seems to me the only way to make it right is to offer these folks their jobs back.”

If not, Patrick said state employees will no longer stay in Hyatt Hotels when it comes to state employee travel. That’s a threat that has more symbolic than financial impact. Hyatt is still paying health benefits for the laid-off workers, but has said the challenging economy forced the staff changes.

The company said it regrets having to make the personnel change, but that the hotel industry is facing the worst economic climate in decades. Business and personal travel is way down. Maryann VaRence, the company’s human resources director in Boston, said the governor is playing politics, with a price.

“There are 600 associates who work in Hyatt properties in Massachusetts,” VaRence said. “The governor’s boycott would be a direct threat to those jobs.”

State business with the hotel chain is relatively small, in the tens of thousands of dollars a year. But the governor’s threat has turned what touched a public nerve into a symbolic standoff.

[Two of the affiliated comments:]
The problem is that Hyatt did not lay off the workers. Hyatt fired them and hired replacements at a lower cost. Lay off means that the workers are no longer needed. In this case, they were no longer wanted. I wonder what the CEO of Hyatt gets. Wouldn’t it be interesting to see the senior executives make a decision to take a small paycut in order to cut costs rather than fire low-end workers. The move by the governor simply says that the state, which does very little business with Hyatt, will do no business with Hyatt. The response that 600 people work at Hyatt is irrelevant. What about the 100 MA citizens who were fired?
Posted by Marc Respass, on September 24th, 2009 at 11:10 am

What an idiot. The pot calling the kettle black. I’m a state worker, and they are doing that exact same thing where I work. They’re pushing out the union mechanics to replace them with contract mechanics. They did it already at one of our sites and are in the middle of doing it to 13 people at this site. I don’t see this in the news. I don’t think the government should be stepping into the affairs of businesses. They’ll just wreck what remains of the struggling businesses and leave more people unemployed.

Posted by Landry T, on September 24th, 2009 at 3:14 pm

Click here to find out more!
Hyatt Hotel Corp., citing declining revenues, laid off the Boston-area housekeepers, some who had been there for decades, and replaced them with workers from Hospitality Staffing Solutions, a Marietta Georgia company whose employees work at roughly half the wages and without benefits.

In a letter sent on Tuesday, Patrick frowned upon the treatment the fired housekeepers received from their employer. He cited reports that the laid off employees trained their replacements after being told they were vacation fill-ins.

“Surely there is some way to retain the jobs for your housekeeping staff, as other hotels in the area have done, and to work with them to help the company meet its current challenges, rather than tossing them out unceremoniously to fend for themselves while the people they trained take their jobs at barely livable wages,” Patrick said.

Read: Patrick’s Letter To Hyatt CEO

Gov. Patrick says state will boycott Hyatt if it doesn’t rehire workers

September 23, 2009 12:21 PM E-mail| Comments (228)| Text size – +

By Katie Johnston Chase, Globe Staff

Governor Deval Patrick plans to direct state employees to boycott the Hyatt while conducting state business unless the hotel company rehires the housekeepers it fired, he said in a letter sent today to Hyatt chief executive Mark Hoplamazian.

“I understand first hand how difficult it is to manage through the current economic challenges without compounding the disruptions the times have caused,” Patrick wrote. “But surely there is some way to retain the jobs for your housekeeping staffs, as other hotels have done, and to work with them to help the company meet its current challenges, rather than tossing them out unceremoniously to fend for themselves while the people they trained take their jobs at barely livable wages.”

The three Boston area Hyatts — the Hyatt Regency Boston, the Hyatt Regency Cambridge, and the Hyatt Harborside at Logan International Airport — fired their 98 staff housekeepers on Aug. 31 and replaced them with $8-an-hour employees of the Georgia-based Hospitality Staffing Solutions. The staff housekeepers, some of whom had been cleaning rooms at the hotels for more than 20 years and made more than $15 an hour, said they had been asked to train some of these new employees over the past few years and were assured they would not be replacing them. The cleaning company and the Hyatt deny these claims.

The firings have prompted a public outcry against the hotel company. The union that represents Boston-area hotel workers organized a rally in front of the Hyatt Regency Boston last week and several local politicans and business owners have called for a boycott. The National Employment Lawyers Association cancelled its contract with the Hyatt Regency Boston after it heard the news and is searching for another Boston hotel to hold its October seminar.

Patrick called Hyatt’s chief executive last week to express his concern over the outsourcing, and the two spoke again on Monday. Hoplamazian sent Patrick a letter over the weekend, and Patrick replied yesterday. “You must understand,” he wrote, “that what has been imposed on these workers — most of whom have worked hard, played by the rules, and invested their time and energy in your company’s success — is both upsetting in its own right and also the worst nightmare of every worker in today’s weak economy.”

Patrick called on Hoplamazian to reconsider the decision to replace the housekeepers, and if he doesn’t, Patrick said he would tell state employees not to use the Hyatt. “This is not how I like to operate,” Patrick concluded in the letter. “But the treatment of these workers appears to be so substandard that it leaves me no choice.”

In a statement, Phil Stamm, general manager of Hyatt Regency Boston, said the chain “has been forced to make some very difficult decisions” and “regret whenever staff reductions are necessary.

“We are disappointed by the governor’s decision to threaten a boycott of our hotels since it directly threatens the 600 associates who work in Hyatt properties and who live and work in Massachusetts at a time when businesses and individuals are cutting back on travel during the worst economic periods we have seen in decades,” he wrote. “We do not understand why the governor is putting more Massachusetts jobs at risk instead of working with us to find jobs for employees affected by the realities of these unprecedented economic challenges.”

In addition to the threatened boycott, Gov. Patrick also hosted a meeting last night with 30 fired Hyatt workers and union leaders. In the meeting, the workers gave tearful accounts of how they feel about Hyatt denying that they had trained their replacements. Gisela Romero, a former housekeeper at the Hyatt at Logan, said: “We are not liars, we trained the people.”

After the meeting, Patrick responded to a media question about the state’s staff reductions, saying: “We haven’t had our workers training their replacements at a fraction of the wage rate.”

Read Governor Patrick’s letter to Hyatt (PDF)

Governor threatens a Hyatt boycott – The Boston Globe

Sep 24, 2009 … The Hyatt Regency Boston, the Hyatt Regency Cambridge, and the Hyatt … a meeting last night with 30 fired Hyatt workers and union leaders. …

www.boston.com/business/articles/2009/09/24/g... – 15 hours ago – Similar pages

Housekeepers lose Hyatt jobs to outsourcing – The …

Sep 17, 2009 … When the housekeepers at the three Hyatt hotels in the Boston area … The Hyatt housekeepers were not part of the union but reached out to …

www.boston.com/business/articles/2009/09/17/houseke...Similar pages

[ More results from www.boston.com ]

Full Coverage: Gov. Patrick issues state boycott of Hyatt over …

Sep 23, 2009 … Full Coverage: Gov. Patrick issues state boycott of Hyatt over labor dispute.

www.newstin.com/rel/us/en-010-018553890Similar pages

YouTube – Patrick Threatens Hyatt Boycott

Gov. Deval Patrick will tell all state employees to stop doing official business with Hyatt unless the company rehires the housekeeping staff it fired from …

www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGBRmiiL5WI – 20 hours ago – Similar pages

Road Closures Pittsburgh G-20

FireShot Pro capture #011 - 'Department of Public Safety - G-20 Safety' - www_g20safety_org_road_closures_htm

Road Closures

1. Fort Duquesne Boulevard /10th Street Bypass ramp from Fort Duquesne Bridge
2. Fort Duquesne Blvd/10th St Bypass Ramp from Fort Pitt Bridge
3. Liberty Avenue Ramp from Fort Pitt Bridge
4. Downtown Ramp from Fort Duquesne Bridge
5. Stanwix Street Ramp from 376 Underpass
6. Grant Street Exit from 376 East
7. Grant Street Exit from 376 West
8. Boulevard of the Allies Ramp from Liberty Bridge
9. Second Avenue and Municipal Court Drive
10. Second Ave and Try Street
11. Second Avenue and B Way
12. First Avenue and Ross Street
13. Second Ave and Ross Street
14. Court Place and Ross Street
15. Third Avenue and Ross Street
16. Fourth Avenue and Ross Street
17. Forbes Avenue and Ross Street
18. Fifth Avenue and Ross Street
19. Sixth Ave and Ross Street
20. Bigelow Boulevard at Seventh Avenue
21. Seventh Avenue ramp from Mellon Arena
22. 15th Street and Smallman Street
23. 15th Street and Penn Avenue
24. 16th Street and Liberty Avenue
25. Smithfield Street Bridge and Carson Street
26. Federal Street and Isabella Street
27. Sandusky Street and Isabella Street
© 2009 City of Pittsburgh · All rights reserved

Genome Study Reveals No Genetic Reason For Caste

A map showing the groups across India included in the Nature study. (Credit: Photo courtesy of D. Reich, K. Thangaraj, N. Patterson, A. Price and L. Singh)

Ancestral Populations Of India And Relationships To Modern Groups Revealed

ScienceDaily (Sep. 24, 2009) — In a study published in the September 24th issue of Nature, an international team describes how they harnessed modern genomic technology to explore the ancient history of India, the world’s second most populous nation.

The new research reveals that nearly all Indians carry genomic contributions from two distinct ancestral populations. Following this ancient mixture, many groups experienced periods of genetic isolation from each other for thousands of years. The study, which has medical implications for people of Indian descent, was led by scientists at the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB) in Hyderabad, India together with US researchers at Harvard Medical School, the Harvard School of Public Health and the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT.

"This work is an outstanding example of the power of international collaboration," said Lalji Singh, senior author of the Nature paper, who is a Bhatnagar Fellow and the former director of CCMB. "Scientists

in India and the United States have together made discoveries that would have been impossible for either group working alone."

Although the genome sequences of any two unrelated people differ by just 0.1%, that tiny slice of genetic material is a rich source of information. It provides clues that can help reconstruct the historical origins of modern populations. It also points to genetic variations that heighten the risk of certain diseases. In recent years, maps of human genetic variation have opened a window onto the diversity of populations across the world, yet India has been largely unrepresented until now.

To shed light on genetic variability across the Indian subcontinent, the research team analyzed more than 500,000 genetic markers across the genomes of 132 individuals from 25 diverse groups, representing 13 states, all six language families, traditionally "upper" and "lower" castes, and tribal groups.

These genomic analyses revealed two ancestral populations. "Different Indian groups have inherited forty to eighty percent of their ancestry from a population that we call the Ancestral North Indians who are related to western Eurasians, and the rest from the Ancestral South Indians, who are not related to any group outside India," said co-author David Reich, an associate professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School and an associate member of the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT.

The finding that nearly all Indian groups descend from mixtures of two ancestral populations applies to traditional "tribes" as well as "castes." Kumarasamy Thangaraj, a senior research scientist at CCMB in Hyderabad and a co-author said, "It is impossible to distinguish castes from tribes using the data. The genetics proves that they are not systematically different. This supports the view that castes grew directly out of tribal-like organizations during the formation of Indian society."

The one exception to the finding that all Indian groups are mixed is the indigenous people of the Andaman Islands, an archipelago in the Indian Ocean with a census of only a few hundred today. The Andamanese appear to be related exclusively to the Ancestral South Indian lineage and therefore lack Ancestral North Indian ancestry.

"The Andamanese are unique," said co-author Nick Patterson, a mathematician and researcher at the Broad Institute. "Understanding their origins provides a window onto the history of the Ancestral South Indians, and the period tens of thousands of years ago when they diverged from other Eurasians." Added Singh, "Our project to sample the disappearing tribes of the Andaman Islands has been more successful than we could have hoped, as the Andamanese are the only surviving remnant of the ancient colonizers of South Asia."

The researchers’ work also has surprising and important medical implications. They discovered that many groups in modern India descend from a small number of founding individuals, and have since been genetically isolated from other groups. In scientific parlance this is called a "founder event."

"The finding that a large proportion of modern Indians descend from founder events means that India is genetically not a single large population, but instead is best described as many smaller isolated populations," said Singh. Thangaraj continued, "The widespread history of founder events helps explain why the incidence of genetic diseases among Indians is different from the rest of the world."

Founder events in other groups, such as Finns and Ashkenazi Jews, are well known to increase the incidence of recessive genetic diseases, and the new study predicts that the same will be true for many groups in India. "It is important to carry out a systematic survey of Indian groups to identify which ones descend from the strongest founder events," said Reich. "Further studies of these groups should lead to the rapid discovery of genes that cause devastating diseases, and will help in the clinical care of individuals and their families who are at risk."

"Just as important as these findings are the statistical approaches that led to them," said Alkes Price, an assistant professor of epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health and a co-author of the Nature study. "In studying Indian genetic variation we also developed a novel toolkit for understanding the relationships among groups and the history of mixture. We believe that these tools can drive future studies not only of Indian history but of groups worldwide."

Journal reference:

  1. David Reich, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Nick Patterson, Alkes L. Price & Lalji Singh. Reconstructing Indian population history. Nature, 2009; DOI: 10.1038/nature08365

Adapted from materials provided by Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard.

Truth Seeker Is Back From the Dead!!


TRUTH SEEKER HAS RETURNED FROM THE DEAD.  Let’s hope they have better protection now; you never know what nasty thing you might catch on the web.

News Brief: Defiant Iran tests new centrifuges Iran is reportedly testing a new generation of centrifuges with an output capacity five times more than those currently in use More …

The Ugly Truth: “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall” Mark Glenn on how pathological narcissism could be the sparkplug of Armageddon More …
China Firms Selling Fuel to Iran as U.S. Sanctions Loom In a move that could undermine the impact of sanctions the U.S. is reported to be considering, Iran has begun importing fuel from China More …
News Brief: ‘Israel will attack Iran this year’ Putting further pressure on the West to act over Iran, a former deputy Israeli defense minister warns that Israel will soon take matters into its own hands More …
Vigilant Citizen: Beyonce’s Sweet Dreams – Occult Mind Control Vigilant Citizen looks at Beyonce’s “Sweet Dreams” video and finds hidden echoes of Monarch mind control More …
China weighs purchase of IMF gold –report The International Monetary Fund has put over 400 tonnes of gold up for sale – no doubt to keep down the price of gold – and China is reportedly a prospective buyer. So is it also reconsidering its dollar holdings? More …
Smoking Mirrors: The Truthseeker’s Imprisoned in Rothschild’s Castle Seems like this website wasn’t the only one to come under cyber attack, which can only mean that the powers that be are getting worried More …
China could Undermine US Military Power in Pacific Echoing other intelligence estimates, Defense Secretary Robert Gates says China’s increasingly advanced military technology could pose an serious challenge to U.S. carrier battle groups and bases in the Pacific More …
Kremlin says Israel promised not to strike Iran Why should they when they can get America to do it for them? More …
Henry Makow Ph.D.: The Dreyfus Affair Was A Rothschild Psy-Op In a celebrated 1894 case, a French captain was falsely accused of passing secrets to the Germans. That fact that he was Jewish seemed to confirm the belief that Jews were undermining France. But as Henry Makow reveals, the Rothschilds carefully orchestra More …
US Spec Ops operates psywar websites targeted at UK So now we know who may be to blame for the cyber-attacks that brough this website down More …
EU says ready for talks or confrontation with Iran Sweden’s Foreign Minister, whose country currently holds the European Union presidency, says the E.U. is ready for confrontation with Iran. “If they want confrontation”, says the regular Bilderberg attendee, “then confrontation will happen” More …


The cover of Beyonce’s latest release. See Vigilant Citizen’s analysis of Beyonce’s Sweet Dreams – Occult Mind Control
Reflections in a Petri Dish: Surfing the Beaches of Deadwood with Lt Col Kilgore
Madonna’s pilgrimage to Israel hits a sticky patch
Missing channel pirate ship carried Russian arms for Iran
Makers of Vaccination Refuse to Take H1N1
Iran dismisses bomb studies intelligence as forged
Patrick J. Buchanan: Did Hitler Want War?
John Pilger: Lockerbie: Megrahi Was Framed
Animal House in Afghanistan
Ether Content and the “Master Race”
Henry Makow Ph.D.: Liberal Jews, Sex & The New Satanic Order
Jay-Z’s “Run This Town” and the Occult Connexions
Henry Makow Ph.D.: Is Local Legislature a Disguised Pagan Temple?
Robert Fisk: For the truth, look to Tehran and Damascus – not Tripoli
Henry Makow: “Tolerance” is a Guise for Social Engineering
Calling Jews ‘Nazis’ may be criminalised
Reflections in a Petri Dish: Roiling in the Kali-fornicatorium
7/7 Attacks Not “Suicide Bombings”?
Beating the War Drums Again: Time for an Israeli Strike?
Repost: 7/7 Ripple Effect
When Will It Start?
Christopher Bollyn – Repost: Exposing the Zionist Hidden Hand That Rules Britain and the United States
Repost: David and Goliath?
Norwegian politician: Planet X is Incoming 2.000.000 To Go Underground
I Felt Blessed, A Great Sense of Euphoria
Iran’s Jews reject cash offer to move to Israel
Too Much of a Coincidence
People Born Blind Can See During Near Death Experiences
T Stokes: A Typical Near Death Experience
Updated: Bigger Than 9/11?
More History of the Rothschilds
Info Wars: BBC Has Lost Tapes Of 21st Century’s Defining Moment
Prison Planet: Time Stamp Confirms BBC Reported WTC 7 Collapse 26 Minutes In Advance
BBC’s 9/11 Conspiracy Files: Points Which Were Ignored
Sex Subliminals from National Geographic
“WIPED OFF THE MAP” – The Rumor of the Century
Repost: The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!
Demonolatry and Devilry in Modern Britain
Promotions, Pay Rises, Honours: How the Key Players in the Kelly Scandal Were Rewarded
Link Fixed: Thermite and the Controlled Demolition of the World Trade Center
Low IQs are Africa’s curse, says lecturer
Mrs Saddam says Saddam is not Saddam
Video: Explosions Before WTC 7 Collapse?
The Coming Mass Expulsion of Jews from Britain
Updated: Bush Buys Land in Northern Paraguay
Michel Chossudovsky: Who Benefits from the Afghan Opium Trade?
More on David Cole at Auschwitz
Video: David Cole at Auschwitz
Video: 9/11 Truth: Thermite & The Case for Controlled Demolition
Jewish rabbi calls for extermination of all Palestinian males
Video: 9/11 Controlled Demolitions of September 11, 2001
Benjamin Freedman’s Address to US Marine Cadets in 1974
Following Zakheim and Pentagon trillions to Israel and 9-11
Updated: A Thank you To All Starbucks Customers
Wikipedia’s Political Slant is Showing
Who was Rudolph Diesel?
The Broken Cross
Jews Pray for the Immediate Disintegration of the Zionist Regime
The Pope was Jewish says historian
Whatever Happened to Ariel Sharon?
The US Plans a Long, Long Stay in Iraq
Satan’s “El Diablo” Hand Sign
Why the Sudden Clampdown on Revisionists?
Wayne Madsen: Al Qaeda – The Database
Henry Makow Ph.D.: Hollywood Pushes Racial Intermarriage
The Marijuana Trick
Pre 9/11 World Trade Center Power-Down
Seeing Through the Illusion: Who’s That Man?
Back to the Future!!! Part 1
Back to the Future!!! Part 2
Something Evil This Way Comes?
Israel Shamir: On the Move
Mossad and 911
Oil Fields Are Refilling…Naturally – Sometimes Rapidly
911 Smoking Gun: The Perfect Terrorist Plan To Level The Twin Towers Created In 1976
Russian Intelligence Chief Says Al-Qaeda a Myth
The 9/11 WTC Fires: Where’s the Inferno?
The True Face of Jesus
Rasputin, the Romanovs and the Russian Revolution: “Dark Forces”
Holocaust Survivor Memoir Exposed as Fraud
Ashcroft’s Hellish Vision: Detention Camps for US Citizens
The Controlled Collapse of WTC7
Israel was not Founded as a Jewish State. It’s Founded as an Occult State
Pre-9/11 World Trade Center Power-Down
The Ringworm Holocaust: 100,000 Radiations
Crop Circle Con.com
New ‘Official’ Changes in the Auschwitz Story
Henry Makow Ph.D.: Zionism: A Conspiracy Against Jews
Secrets of the Bank of England Revealed
Joe Vialls: Mrs Saddam says Saddam is not Saddam
Filmmaker Kept Quiet About Iraqi Prisoner Abuse
Updated December 17, 2004: The Mastermind Behind 911?
Link Fixed: Video Evidence of Controlled Demolition
Berg decapitation video was filmed inside the Abu Ghraib prison
Worst rape photos of Iraqi women detainees not yet officially released
Israeli Agents Believed Involved in Abu Ghraib
Micheal Moore Exposed
Hizbollah Slams Beheading of American as Un-Islamic
When The Explosives Were Placed: WTC South Tower Upper Floors Closed on 9/8 & 9/9
CBS News Channel Eyewitness Describes ‘Secondary Explosions’ in the WTC
What are Israeli Army Reconnaissance Teams doing in Patagonia?
Saddam’s wife could not recognize her husband
The Evening Standard Doctored Photos
Israel Shamir: Flowers of Galilee
NYT Shocked: Japanese Substitute Inventiveness for Immigration
Henry Makow Ph.D.: Hitler Didn’t Want World War
Sigmund Freud
The Bush Dynasty: The Unofficial History
Israeli Involvement in 911
The ‘Rosetta Stone’ of Bush’s Military Service
Ike’s Open Field German Camps ‘Stretched For 10 Kilometers’
Young girls will do trade in their virginity: Kali Yuga: Updated
Intelligence and the Wealth and Poverty of Nations
“My Husband is Planning an Accident”
What was really behind the earthquake in Iran?: Weapons of the New World Order: Updated
Allied War Crimes 1941-1950
The Forgotten Holocaust: In ‘Eisenhower’s Death Camps': A U.S. Prison Guard’s Story
Eisenhower’s Holocaust – His Slaughter Of 1.7 Million Germans
Is America the Revived Roman Empire?
Iraqis Doubt Real Hussein Behind Bars
Photo Tricks Betray Saddam Psyop
Click here for more articles