Pak commander blows the lid on Islamabad’s Kargil plot

[This report gives us a point of reference to understand the entire war on terrorism and how it all began in Kargil.  The failure of Musharraf and the top generals to understand Indian air superiority in the face of American sanctions on F-16 spare parts defeated this stratagem before it even began.   The panic caused by the previous Indian and Pakistani nuke tests in 1998 caused both sides to resort to commando/terrorist warfare to further each side's agenda.  The panic on the part of extremist "Islamist" officers within the Pak military was translated into anti-American terrorism as payback for Pakistan's missed opportunity in Kashmir, and to draw the US into the region as Pakistan's buffer against certain defeat at India's hands.  Whether the decision to attack the United States was a command decision, or one made by "rogue" agents within the system is one for others to ask.]

Pak commander blows the lid on Islamabad’s Kargil plot

Kargil conflict

A retired Pak military officer has revealed that entire Kargil ops were planned by Musharraf with tacit approval of Nawaz Sharif.
In the first account by a Pakistani military officer that nails Islamabad’s lie on Kargil, a former pilot who was Director of Operations of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) during the 1999 conflict has given a blow-by-blow account of the preparations undertaken by his country’s Army that led to operations inside the Indian side of the Line of Control.Published in India in the latest issue of the ‘Vayu Aerospace and Defence Review’ magazine, PAF Air Commodore (retd) Kaiser Tufail, the man who “interrogated” IAF Flight Lieutenant K Nachiketa after his MiG-27 crashed in PoK during a bombing run in the initial days of the war, has laid bare the detailed Kargil plan by the Pakistan Army. He says that the “Army trio” of General Pervez Musharraf, 10 Corps Commander Lt Gen Mehmud Ahmad and Force Command Northern Areas commander Maj Gen Javed Hasan “took no one into confidence, neither its operational commanders, nor the heads of the other services”.

Tufail, a decorated fighter pilot who was in charge of air operations during the war, has revealed that the Pak Army placed Stinger shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles on hill tops, moved artillery guns and ammunitions to posts that India had vacated during winter and drew plans to cut off the strategic Drass-Kargil road to choke supplies to the Siachen glacier.

Now based in Lahore, Tufail says the entire operation was planned by Musharraf but had the tacit approval of then Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif who, after a presentation, said “‘General sahib, Bismillah karein’… not withstanding the denials we hear from him every new moon.”

Recalling his meeting with top Army officers, including Lt Gen Mehmud Ahmad who was commanding the Rawalpindi Corps, Tufail writes that the Kargil plan was revealed on May 12, two weeks before India retaliated with air strikes, when Ahmad briefed him and others on the operation.

“Come October, we shall walk in to Siachen — to mop up the dead bodies of hundreds of Indians left hungry, out in the cold,” Ahmad is quoted as having said during the briefing, adding that “I have Stingers on every peak” to counter the threat of Indian air strikes against Pakistani intruders.

“The target was a vulnerable section of Drass-Kargil road, whose blocking would virtually cut off the crucial lifeline which carried the bulk of supplies needed for daily consumption as well as annual winter stocking in Leh-Siachen sector. He (Lt Gen Ahmad) was very hopeful that this stratagem could choke off the Indians in the vital sector for up to a month, after which monsoons would prevent vehicular movements and also suspend airlift by IAF,” Tufail writes on details of the briefing.

Expressing surprise over the failure of Indian intelligence to detect Pakistani movements that led to the occupation of Indian Army posts on the heights of Kargil, Tufail says it was well known in Skardu, days before operations were launched, that “something big is imminent”.

“Helicopter flying activity was feverishly high as Army Aviation Mi 17s were busy moving artillery guns and ammunition to the posts that had been vacated by the Indians during the winter season. Troops in battle gear were to be seen all over the city. Interestingly, Army messes were abuzz with war chatter amongst young officers. In retrospect, one wonders how Indian intelligence agencies failed to read any such signs many weeks before the operation unfolded,” Tufail writes.

Bringing out the disagreement between the Pak Army and Air Force on the operations, Tufail writes that many senior PAF officers tried to explain to the Army that Indian air strikes would wipe out bunkers occupied by ground forces but these were dismissed by the Army after Lt General Ahmad said “troops were well camouflaged and concealed and that IAF pilots would not be able to pick out the posts from the air”.

“Perhaps it was the incredulousness of the whole thing that led Air Commodore Abid Rao (Assistant Chief of Air Staff Operations) to famously quip, ‘After this operation, it’s going the be either a Court Martial or Martial Law’ as we walked out of the briefing room.”

And for the first time, giving details of IAF success in bombing Pakistani positions during the war, Tufail writes that round the clock air attacks had made retention of posts by Pakistani infiltrators “untenable”.

“The Mirage 2000s scored at least five successful laser guided bomb hits on forward dumping sites and posts. During the last days of operations which ended on 12 July, it was clear that delivery accuracy had improved considerably,” he writes.

Contrary to the Indian view that he was shot down, Tufail claims that Flt Lt Nachiketa’s MiG-27 went down due to engine trouble “caused by gas ingestion during high altitude strafing.” He writes: “Flt Lt Nachiketa, who ejected and was apprehended, had a tete-a-tete with this writer during an interesting ‘interrogation’ session.”

He conceded that the PAF had trouble maintaining air patrols in the region to deter Indian fighters as its F-16 mainstay was facing shortage of supply parts due to American sanctions. “After one week of CAPs (combat air patrols), the F-16 maintenance personnel indicated that war reserves were being eaten into and the activity had the be ‘rationalized’, an euphemism for discontinuing it altogether,” Tufail writes.

According to him, F-16 was the only fighter available with Pakistan to counter India but it was decided to discontinue patrols in case its services were needed during a full-blown war. “Those not aware of the gravity of the F-16 operability problem under sanctions have complained of the lack of cooperation by the PAF,” he writes.

Pakistan Arrests 50 Lashkar Jhangvi Suspects From Punjab Province

Pakistan Arrests 50 Terror Suspects From Punjab Province

1/15/2010 4:59 AM ET

(RTTNews) - A crackdown by Pakistani law enforcement agencies in Punjab province has resulted in the arrest of 50 terror suspects, who were allegedly planning to target key installations and important personalities in the eastern province of the country.

Punjab police chief Tariq Salim Dogar told Indian news agency Press Trust of India (PTI) that most of the suspects belonged to the Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, a banned group linked to sectarian violence.

He said the suspects were working for the outlawed Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) of Hakimullah Mehsud, wanted by the US for the killing of seven CIA agents in a suicide-attack on an American secret services base in Afghanistan.

Most of the arrests were effected from Lahore, Faisalabad, Dera Ghazi Khan and Bhakkar. The suspects are currently in the custody of intelligence agencies, Dogar said.

He further said the suspects were allegedly involved in a number of terrorist acts in the province and that their arrest would help curb the ongoing spate of violence in the region.

by RTT Staff Writer

Banned LeJ, Source of All Sectarian Terror In Pakistan, Behind Ashura Blast–Who Were Arsonists?

[SEE: Lashkar-e-Jhangvi militants enter Karachi to strike during Muharram Dec. 24]

Defunct Lashkar-e-Jhangvi behind Karachi blast: Malik tells NA

ISLAMABAD, Jan 14 (APP): Minister for Interior Rehman Malik Thursday told National Assembly that the defunct outfit Lashkar-e-Jhangvi was behind bomb blast in Ashura procession in Karachi while the gangsters and criminals elements supervised subsequent arson in Boulton Market. “The people behind all three blasts in Karachi have been arrested. Defunct outfit Lashkar-e- Jhangvi is behind Karachi attack on Ashura procession,” said Rehman Malik in his opening statement on a motion to discuss the incident of bomb blast and subsequent arsons in Boulton Market Karachi.
He said there is triangular syndicate consisting Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan, Lashkar-e Jhangvi and Al-Qaeda and the claiming the responsibility of attack by a TTP person was aimed at deviating the focus of investigation into all three blasts took place in on December 26, 27 and 28 respectively.
Rehman Malik said during his visit to Karachi, he revealed that the blast was not a suicide as it damaged the front side of the site unlike the suicide blast that affects all locations around, adding that a TTP militant Asmatullah had claimed that Muavia of the same outfit carried out the attack.
The interior minister said the bomb blast took place at 16:30 and the arsons stared at 16:35 and Rangers as well as police were blamed for negligence on the basis of some video footage but the fact was that the city government dispatched a tanker but the rioters attacked that.
However, later the teams reached there and carried out their operation but the fire had engulfed the whole areas, leaving many question as to who was behind that.
He said as there were some plastic stores in the market and the fire could have been extinguished through a foam system that was later managed from Air Force, Civil Aviation and Hyderabad Defense.
He said a team was formed headed by a Director FIA that, following the footage, arrested people involved in looting the shops including an arm shops but, he said the looted items have been recovered for their custody.
For the compensation of shopkeepers, Rs 3.5 billion has been committed by the Prime Minister, one billion rupees by US ambassador and Rs 500 million by Sindh government, adding that the provincial government has also committed to accommodate the victim shopkeepers in the would-be reconstructed plazas.
Rehman Malik told the House that the target killing started from January 7 and almost 15 to 16 people were being killed a day, hailing from all political parties including MQM, PPP and others.
He said the growing incidents of target killing compelled the government to take action against the criminals staying in Liyari and Pak Colony where from the Rangers also recovered hostages.
He said the notions of operation in Liyari was mere propaganda and added that the killings may also be the reaction by criminals being backed by the gangsters involved in disrupting the Karachi peace.
The interior minister assured the House that target killing has effectively been controlled in Karachi and the government carried out no operation in Liyari rather it was action against terrorists.
“No target killing took place in Karachi since last 72 hours because of timely an effective action against terrorists by Sindh government, Rangers and police, in close cooperation with federal government,” said Rehman Malik.
He said the final report of the incidents would shortly come to scene that would be tabled before the House as well as, he added, some of the parliamentarians also expressed their apprehensions about the action by the Rangers.

Obama dictates ominous consolidation of war powers

Obama dictates ominous consolidation of war powers

By Bryce Shonka
Online Journal Guest Writer
Posts

During the Bush years, unprecedented numbers of Americans poured into the streets, oftentimes ignored by establishment media, to protest the Iraq War. Some of those were not so much antiwar, but rather pro-constitution people who recognized the fraudulent nature of Bush’s war and total lack of congressional oversight.

As more time passed and the Middle East body count moved into the millions, even more Americans joined the antiwar effort, motivated by revelations of no-bid/cost-plus federal contracts and carnage by taxpayer -unded mercenaries. 9/11 mania faded and ethical concerns about the nature of preemptive strikes replaced it.

When W gained a second term, the war resistance REALLY heated up, with large numbers of demonstrators continuing to gather until . . . POOF!

The election of Barack Obama

Barack Obama’s large following was due in part to the perception of him as an antiwar candidate, despite the fact that he repeatedly mentioned his support for military action in Afghanistan throughout his campaign. Regardless of the reality, antiwar activism all but dried up after November 5, 2009. The word on the streets? That “war is a Republican/Bush phenomenon” and will go away when Bush and Cheney do.

What a shock it must have been for those falsely reassured by Obama’s election when reports of unprecedented drone attacks, costing the lives of women and children, were credited not to Bush but rather a commander in chief named Obama. Disillusion must have grown stronger still when reports of atrocities committed by taxpayer funded Blackwater mercenaries continued, this time in Pakistan.

Similarities to Bush’s culture of death and destruction became even more clear as Obama announced the escalation of war. His decision to send thousands of additional American troops to Afghanistan flew in the face of analysts who had dubbed that effort futile and was likely the loudest wake-up call yet for the antiwar community, an alarm that left no doubt about the continued necessity for resistance to unconstitutional acts of military aggression.

So.now what?

Obviously, electing a Democratic president is not the answer for those who oppose war — Obama even went so far as to keep Bush’s secretary of defense. Protests did little to prevent the Iraq war in the first place and are almost useless as long as the establishment media ignores them.

The answer to reigning in unconstitutional bloodshed may in fact lie in the powers reserved to the states as codified in law by the 10th Amendment of the Constitution. One implication of the 10th Amendment is the power of each state to decide where and how their National Guard troops can be used, except in three specific instances spelled out in the Constitution, something that may be of particular interest to those in Louisiana for example. One effort to pursue exactly this tactic is being led by an organization whose motto is “Bring the Guard Home! It’s the Law” and already has momentum in several states. (You can find sample Bring the Guard Home legislation here.)

This key principle came under attack last week as President Obama issued an executive order that he says strengthens “further the partnership between the federal government and state governments to protect our Nation.” Partnership? Interesting choice of words considering that his order only further indicates federal disregard for the sovereignty of the states.

This latest decree by the president should cast aside any doubt that President Obama is not only as imperially minded as his predecessor, but now seeks to mangle the carefully designed balance of our republic in ways that surpass even George W. Bush. National Guard units are already deployed overseas in significant numbers instead of fulfilling their intended mission to protect their respective states, a status which will be perpetuated by this executive order unless there is some serious resistance by the states.

For Americans concerned with murderous federal imperialism that lies far outside of our Constitution, it is high time to wake up and realize that nothing has improved under a Democratic president. This move to bind our state governors is the latest indication that our American values are not valued by DC; that our republic is continuing a steady transition from freedom loving republic to military dictatorship and the only thing that can stop it is we the people.

Bryce Shonka is the state chapter coordinator for the California Tenth Amendment Center and lives in Los Angeles, CA. He welcomes your feedback atbryce@tenthamendmentcenter.com.

Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor

The Growth of the Deobandi Jihad in Afghanistan

The Growth of the Deobandi Jihad in Afghanistan

Publication: Terrorism Monitor Volume: 8 Issue: 2

By: Arif Jamal

Commander Ilyas Kashmiri

Three students from Karachi’s Jamia Uloom al-Islamia left their Islamic studies half way to completion and took a train to Peshawar on February 18, 1980 to take part in the nascent anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan. Anti-Russian passion was their only weapon, but they wanted to practice what they had learned in the classrooms of their madrassa. [1] The three students – Irshad Ahmed, Abdus Samad Sial and Mohammad Akhtar – later assumed grand religious titles; the first two became Maulana-s (“Our Master,” a title used for religious leaders with formal qualifications) while the third came to be known as Qari (“Reader,” i.e. one who recites the Quran). His colleagues later gave Qari Akhtar another grand title, “Saifullah” (Sword of Allah). They decided to call their three-member group the Jamiat Ansar-ul-Afghaneen (Party of the Friends of the Afghan people) and chose Irshad Ahmed as their first amir. The three students who formed Jamiat Ansar-ul-Afghaneen while still in their teens would later have a tremendous influence on the rise of Deobandi jihadism in South and Central Asia and beyond.

On their way to Afghanistan the trio joined a small Afghan Deobandi group in Peshawar, the Harakat-e-Inqilab-e-Islami Afghanistan (Islamic Revolutionary Movement of Afghanistan – HIIA) of Maulana Nasrullah Mansoor. Armed by the HIIA, the group crossed the Durand Line into Afghanistan where it became the principal jihadi group for students from the Pakistani Deobandi madrassas. It had already trained some 4,000 Pakistani madrassa students by 1988 when the Soviets started leaving Afghanistan. The Pakistani boys that  the HIIA had trained were later organized under the name of Harakat ul-Jihad al-Islami (Islamic Jihad Movement – HuJI) to wage jihad in Kashmir. [2] These 4,000 Deobandi jihadists provided the foundation on which the entire Pakistani Deobandi jihadist movement was founded in later years. Most of the Pakistani jihadist groups, including parts of the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), directly trace their roots to the HuJI.

HIIA and HuJI played another more important role, mostly ignored until now, by helping the Deobandi movement grow in largely Barelvi Afghanistan (the Barelvi are a less politicized branch of Muslims who place more stress on rituals). They not only recruited boys from the Pakistani Deobandi madrassas to fight jihad in Afghanistan, but also helped place Afghans in the Pakistani madrassas. These students later founded the Taliban movement. Thanks to HIIA, the Pakistani and Afghan Deobandis built a relationship that has survived against all odds. Interestingly, all the Pakistani Deobandi groups have split several times, but maintain unbreakable bonds with the Afghan Taliban, the main Deobandi group in Afghanistan.

HuJI in Kashmir and the First Split

At the end of the Afghan jihad in 1989, the HuJI looked for another theater of jihad and found one in nearby Kashmir. HuJI temporarily abandoned the Afghan theater of jihad completely and focused on Indian-administered Kashmir, which offered a gateway to India. The beginning was slow as Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) was not ready to unleash Pakistani jihadi groups in Kashmir for fear of reprisals from India. Moreover, the ISI was unable even to train and arm the boys crossing into Pakistan from Kashmir until 1991. [3] This period of relative inactivity gave birth to internal frictions in the group, which split in 1991. Maulana Fazlur Rehman Khalil and Maulana Masood Kashmiri led the revolt against the founding members and founded Harakatul Mujahideen. It is not clear what really caused the split. The founding members later alleged that Maulana Khalil was too subservient to the ISI and always sought publicity. [4] However, the split was a serious jolt to the HuJI, as the bulk of the mujahideen followed Maulana Khalil, their commander and teacher.

Foundation of Harakatul Ansaar, al-Faran and the Second Split

The split in the HuJI, an important recipient of Saudi money, made the Saudis very unhappy. They deputed a Mecca-based Deobandi alim (scholar), Maulana Abdul Hafeez Makki, to reunite the two groups. Maulana Makki immediately established contacts with an emerging jihadi alim, Maulana Masood Azhar, to fulfill this task (Masood later founded Jaish-i-Mohammad in 2000). Maulana Makki became a regular visitor to Pakistan in this period. [5] Their efforts bore fruit when the two groups reunited in 1993 under the name of Harakatul Ansar. Maulana Sadatullah became the amir of the united group. This is the time when the Kashmiri groups, particularly the Hizbul Mujahideen (the armed wing of Pakistan’s Jamaat-i-Islami and distinct from Harakatul Mujahideen), started showing weakness in the face of atrocities by the Indian security forces. This was also the time when the inflow of Kashmiri boys began decreasing. To keep the pot boiling in Kashmir, the ISI started encouraging Pakistani jihadi groups such as the HuJI to play a bigger role in the jihad in Kashmir.
Harakatul Ansar attracted a lot of attention the following year when, helped by a small group of Hizbul Mujahideen, it occupied the Islamic shrine at Charar Sharif in Indian-administered Kashmir. The event encouraged jihadis fighting in Kashmir and jolted the Indian security forces. After its success in Charar Sharif, Harakatul Ansar organized the kidnapping of some European and American tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir. A previously unknown group, al-Faran, believed to be a front group for the Harakatul Ansar, claimed responsibility. After several months the United States designated Harakatul Ansar as a terrorist group. As U.S. pressure increased on Pakistan to take action against Harakatul Ansar, the ISI apparently asked them to split once more. The group again split into HuJI and Harakatul Mujahideen. [6]

A Failed Coup d’état by Jihadist Major-General Abbasi

The al-Faran episode was a wake-up call for the Benazir Bhutto government, which started putting pressure on the ISI to come clean on the jihadi scene. It also came down a little harder on the jihadis. HuJI decided not to take all of this lying down. In the early second half of 1995, the Pakistani civilian intelligence discovered a plot by a small group of Islamist army officers led by Major General Zahirul Islam Abbasi. The officers were accumulating arms to take over command of the army and the government. The intelligence services discovered that the plotters had planned to eliminate the entire military command during the corps commanders’ conference on September 30, 1995. Major General Abbasi’s group was closely affiliated with HuJI and wanted to overthrow the Bhutto government to pave the way for a Taliban takeover similar to Afghanistan. HuJI was to help the rebel army officers. In his first interview with the author, Major General Abbasi denied any plan to overthrow the government but did admit that his group was transporting arms and ammunition from the Afghan mujahideen to the Kashmiri mujahideen. [7] However, in a subsequent interview, he admitted that they were taking action against the Bhutto government and the army command as part of their faith. [8] During both interviews, he admitted his links with the HuJI. However, before the trial of the military began, the ISI asked Qari Akhtar to go to Afghanistan. Qari Akhtar returned to Pakistan only when General Musharraf dismissed Prime Minister Sharif’s government.

9/11 – New Directions

In spite of severe differences amongst them, all of the Pakistani Deobandi groups and political parties maintained close links with the Afghan Taliban. Jihadi groups went further and established links with al-Qaeda after the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan. Many of them, such as HuJI, trained their cadres in al-Qaeda’s training camps. The U.S. bombing and occupation of Afghanistan enraged the entire Deobandi movement in Pakistan. They turned their guns against General Musharraf when he decided to join the U.S.-led coalition against terror in order to save the Kashmir jihad. Half of the Deobandi jihadi movement decided to fight General Musharraf while the other half would remain in sleeper cells as part of the grand strategy. Qari Akhtar took up arms against his former benefactor, General Musharraf but fled Pakistan after failed assassination attempts on the Pakistani president. Qari Akhtar was arrested in Dubai in August 2005 and extradited to Pakistan. However, under the growing influence of the Islamists, he was never prosecuted. After the suicide attack on the arrival ceremony of Benazir Bhutto in October 2007 (which she survived), she blamed Qari Akhtar and others for planning it. He was arrested but was again let off the hook.

HuJI carried out several high-profile terrorist attacks in the years following 9/11 but claimed responsibility through previously unknown front groups. The attack on the then-finance minister and later prime minister, Shaukat Aziz, was claimed by the Islambouli Brigade; the attack on Lieutenant General Ahsan Saleem Hayat was claimed by the Jundullah of Karachi, and so on. Some of the other terrorist acts were claimed by or blamed on HuJI-al-Almi. It is important to note that most of the terrorists arrested in the post-9/11 period in Pakistan belonged to HuJI or to groups split from HuJI.

Commander Ilyas Kashmiri and al-Qaeda

HuJI ran at least six training camps, three in Pakistan and three in Afghanistan, before the 9/11 attacks forced the terrorists to go underground. These training camps included Ma’askar (“camp”) Mehmood Ghaznavi in Kotli (Pakistan-administered Kashmir), Ma’askar Abu Ubaida bin Jarrah in Gilgit (Northern Areas of Pakistan) and Ma’askar Abu Haneefa in Mansehra (North-West Frontier Province). In Afghanistan, they ran Ma’askar Irshad in Jalaabad, Ma’askar Khalid Zubair Shaheed in Rashkor near Kabul and another camp in Kirgha near Kabul. Ma’askar Mehmood Ghaznavi in Kotli was used by Brigade 313 [9], the wing dedicated to jihad in the Jammu region of Indian administered Kashmir while the remaining five trained jihadis from all over the world, including al-Qaeda cadres. [10] 313 Brigade leader Ilyas Kashmiri was arrested in the wake of the failed assassination attempt on Musharraf in December 2003, while Qari Akhtar succeeded in escaping for a time but was later arrested. Like Qari Akhtar and others, Commander Kashmiri escaped punishment thanks to the growing influence of the Islamists. In 2005, Commander Kashmiri moved to the Waziristan region where he coordinates his group’s activities with the TTP and al-Qaeda. Commander Kashmiri is a prime suspect in coordinating the suicide attack on Forward Operating Base Chapman in the Khost province of Afghanistan in December 2009 that killed seven CIA officers and injured six others. The United States is currently seeking his extradition from Pakistan (The News, January 6).

Notes:

1. Author’s interview with Abdus Samad Sial, July 30, 2001.
2. Ibid.
3. See Arif Jamal, Shadow War: The Untold Story of Jihad in Kashmir, Melville House, New York, 2009.
4. Author’s interview with Qari “Saifullah” Akhtar, Afghanistan, July 1999.
5. Author’s interview with Maulana Fazlur Rehman Khalil, Rawalpindi, October 2000.
6. Author’s interview with Maulana Ameen Rabbani, Rawalpindi, December 1999.
7. Author’s interview with Major General Zahirul Islam Abbasi, Rawalpindi, March 2002.
8. Author’s interview with Major General Zahirul Islam Abbasi, July 2005.
9. 313 Muslims won the first jihad under the leadership of the Prophet Muhammad against an army 10,000 infidels.
10. Author’s interview with Commander Ilyas Kashmiri, Kotli, June 2000.

A Single Election That Could End Obama’s Veto-Proof Majority In Senate

Massachusetts vote could threaten health reform

BOSTON
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley speaks to supporters in Boston, Massachusetts December 8, 2009. REUTERS/Brian Snyder

BOSTON (Reuters) – Voter disenchantment in liberal Massachusetts with President Barack Obama’s policies has turned a Senate election into a nail-biter that could imperil U.S. healthcare reform.

BARACK OBAMA

Democrats envisioned a smooth passing of the baton in the January 19 special election to fill the seat of the late Edward Kennedy, a political giant who died of brain cancer in August after holding the seat for 46 years.

A victory would maintain the Democrats’ 60-seat Senate majority, allowing them to overcome Republican procedural hurdles that could block reform of the $2.5 trillion healthcare sector, Obama’s top legislative priority.

Instead, some polls say the race between State Attorney-General Martha Coakley, 56, and her Republican opponent, State Senator Scott Brown, is too close to call.

“The closeness of the race reflects deep voter dissatisfaction with how the president and the congressional majority are dealing with vital matters,” including healthcare and the war on terror, said Mark Landy, a political science professor at Boston College.

Both sides are pouring millions of dollars into the northeastern state to buy television advertising, much of it negative, and Democrats are bringing out their big guns for Coakley’s final push.

Obama made a personal pitch for the candidate via e-mail and a Web video on Thursday. Former President Bill Clinton, who is popular in the state, will stump for Coakley in Boston on Friday. And the Kennedy family has come out in force this week on her behalf.

Raising the stakes for Democrats, Brown has vowed to vote against the health care bill should he pull off an upset win.

To forestall that possibility, Secretary of State William Galvin, Massachusetts’ top election official, said on Wednesday certifying the election results could take weeks.

Until the winner is certified and seated, interim Sen. Paul Kirk, a Democrat, would remain in the Senate and has said he would vote for the health care bill.

“THE PEOPLE’S SEAT”

Surveys over the past week suggest the election could be anything from a double-digit Coakley cruise to a statistical tie. Republicans last held a U.S. Senate seat in the New England state more than four decades ago.

But Brown, 50, an attorney, former model and Lieutenant Colonel in the Army National Guard, threw down the gauntlet on Monday in a debate with Coakley.

“It’s not the Kennedys’ seat, it’s not the Democrats’ seat, it’s the people’s seat,” Brown said.

2010 was already shaping up as a rough year for Obama and the Democrats. The party in power typically loses seats in an off-year election after a Presidential victory.

But the possibility of losing a seat in the most liberal state in the country — and Kennedy’s old seat at that — shows the extent of Obama’s troubles.

As the campaign winds down Democrats have tried to link Brown to the policies of former President George W. Bush, noting he is opposed to financial reform on Wall Street.

DON’T TAKE US FOR GRANTED

Regardless of the national mood, Coakley’s bigger risk is a voter backlash against Massachusetts’ long history of one-party rule and political corruption, said Thomas Whalen, a political historian at Boston University.

The state’s Democratic Party is seen as rife with scandal. Three consecutive former Massachusetts House speakers have been indicted and three state senators have resigned in disgrace in the past two years for various infractions.

“Voters are very angry at the way things have turned out locally; the way the state’s Democrats have abused their power with one scandal after another,” Whalen said. “The message of this election is ‘don’t take us for granted,’ and Martha Coakley is collateral damage.”

In the end, Coakley’s support in western Massachusetts, her backing by many women’s groups, and the Democratic Party’s more effective get-out-the-vote apparatus could pull out a narrow victory that weeks ago seemed all but assured.

Another Day, Another Airstrike On Hakeemullah–Maybe This One Killed the Little Criminal

Fresh drone strike targets Hakeemullah again

A latest drone strike on a suspected militant hideout in South Waziristan has injured the TTP chief: reports. – AFP (File Photo)

PESHAWAR: A latest drone strike on a suspected militant hideout in South Waziristan has injured the Chief of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan Hakeemullah Mehsud on Friday, according to a DawnNews report.

However, the government is yet to confirm the reports of his death. ‘We cannot confirm the death of Hakeemullah yet,’ stated the Information Minister Qamar Zaman Kaira.

“So far we do not have confirmation of him either getting killed or getting injured. It will take a little more time to confirm this or otherwise,” chief military spokesman Major General Athar Abbas told AFP.

“Intelligence agencies are at their work, they are trying to probe and find out from their sources.” Abbas said issues of access in the Taliban-controlled area were one hurdle in obtaining information.

“We only have the information that there was a strike and there was the presence of militants in the compound, but whether the leadership was there or not is yet to be confirmed,” he added.

The fresh airstrike comes a day after Mehsud fled a similar strike in the restive tribal belt.

As reports emerged Thursday of Mehsud’s possible demise in the strike, the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) group he commands swiftly put out a statement saying he was alive, and on Friday repeated their claims.

“Hakimullah is alive and safe. I met with him last night, there was not even a scratch on him,” TTP spokesman Azam Tariq told AFP by telephone.

“He left the place (of the strike) 40 or 60 minutes beforehand,” he said, referring to the remote Shaktoi area pounded by the missiles.

Tariq said a meeting of Taliban elders would be convened soon to decide whether to release a new video of Mehsud proving their claims.

Hakimullah Mehsud assumed leadership of the group blamed for the deaths of thousands of people in attacks in Pakistan after his predecessor, Baitullah Mehsud, was killed in a US drone strike in August last year.

The TTP denied Baitullah Mehsud’s death for weeks, apparently amid fierce infighting over his successor. Hakimullah Mehsud himself had to counter rumours of his own demise at the hands of a rival militant in October. –DawnNews/ AFP

Obama’s Boy Pushing Disruption of Political Expression, to Defeat Conspiracy Theorists

Got Fascism? : Obama Advisor Promotes ‘Cognitive Infiltration’

Presidential advisor and long-time Obama buddy Cass Sunstein.
Your government appointees at work:
Cass Sunstein seeks ‘cognitive’ provocateurs

By Marc Estrin / The Rag Blog / January 11, 2010

Cass Sunstein is President Obama’s Harvard Law School friend, and recently appointed Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.

In a recent scholarly article, he and coauthor Adrian Vermeule take up the question of “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.” (J. Political Philosophy, 7 (2009), 202-227). This is a man with the president’s ear. This is a man who would process information and regulate things. What does he here propose?

[W]e suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity. (Page 219.)

Read this paragraph again. Unpack it. Work your way through the language and the intent. Imagine the application. What do we learn?

  • It is “extremists” who “supply” “conspiracy theories.”
  • Their “hard core” must be “broken up” with distinctive tactics. What tactics?
  • “Infiltration” (“cognitive”) of groups with questions about official explanations or obfuscations or lies. Who is to infiltrate?
  • “Government agents or their allies,” virtually (i.e. on-line) or in “real-space” (as at meetings), and “either openly or anonymously,” though “infiltration” would imply the latter. What will these agents do?
  • Undermine “crippled epistemology” — one’s theory and technique of knowledge. How will they do this?
  • By “planting doubts” which will “circulate.” Will these doubts be beneficial?
  • Certainly. Because they will introduce “cognitive diversity.”

Put into English, what Sunstein is proposing is government infiltration of groups opposing prevailing policy. Palestinian Liberation? 9/11 Truth? Anti-nuclear power? Stop the wars? End the Fed? Support Nader? Eat the Rich?

It’s easy to destroy groups with “cognitive diversity.” You just take up meeting time with arguments to the point where people don’t come back. You make protest signs which alienate 90% of colleagues. You demand revolutionary violence from pacifist groups.

We expect such tactics from undercover cops, or FBI. There the agents are called “provocateurs” — even if only “cognitive.” One learns to smell or deal with them in a group, or recognize trolling online. But even suspicion or partial exposure can “sow uncertainty and distrust within conspiratorial groups [now conflated with conspiracy theory discussion groups] and among their members,” and “raise the costs of organization and communication” — which Sunstein applauds as “desirable.” “[N]ew recruits will be suspect and participants in the group’s virtual networks will doubt each other’s bona fides.” (p.225).

And are we now expected to applaud such tactics frankly proposed in a scholarly journal by a high-level presidential advisor?

The full text of a slightly earlier version of Sunstein’s article is available for download here.

Marc Estrin. The author gets in the last word.
[Marc Estrin is a writer and activist, living in Burlington, Vermont. His novels, Insect Dreams, The Half Life of Gregor Samsa, The Education of Arnold Hitler, Golem Song, and The Lamentations of Julius Marantz have won critical acclaim. His memoir, Rehearsing With Gods: Photographs and Essays on the Bread & Puppet Theater(with Ron Simon, photographer) won a 2004 theater book of the year award. He is currently working on a novel about the dead Tchaikovsky.]

The Rag Blog