More of the Same, Now India Has a Drone Infestation

25 01 2010

India concerned, as UAV spotted in Kutch Region

Written by Admin
Monday, 25 January 2010 14:10
New Delhi: Breaking News! There is a growing concern in India, after an aircraft (UAV – Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) was spotted along the Indo-Pak border in Kutch region of Gujarat last night. the incident occurred on the eve of Republic Day celebrations in India, which will be held tomorrow.

The intelligence agencies have already warned that anti-India forces may plan to launch a big strike to disrupt peace in the region.

Earlier, satellite images proved that a large number of tunnels have come up in Sargodha district of Pakistan’s Punjab province. The tunnels are huge in size and are not meant to be used in transportation purpose, as they are not connected to roads.

Security experts believe that there is something going on across the border and India need to be alert to face any eventuality. It is suspected that the new tunnels built by Pakistan could be used to store nuclear weapons or missiles.

In another development, a bomb was found in a car parked near the Halwara Air Base, near Ludhiana. The bomb was later defused by the bomb disposal squad. The Mumbai Police has already put a ban on paragliding activities in the city for 15 days starting from today in the wake of increased threat perception.





India’s “Non-Political” Intelligence Agencies Hype New Terror Fear Invention

25 01 2010

[The delusional spy agencies of India have clearly abandoned all sense of reality in this latest terror invention.  If they are going to claim that Pakistan is digging North Korea-like tunnels under the border for infiltration, then why not base the plot a hundred miles or so closer to the actual border?  Whatever the reason for all the digging near Sargodha, it couldn't be for a tunnel to India.  From the Hindu video posted beneath this article, it looks like a bunch of backhoes in operation.  Digging tunnels miles long would require machinery much, much larger than that in the video.]

Pak tunnels near border worry government

Sachin Parashar , TNN

NEW DELHI: As the war of words between India and Pakistan reaches a crescendo, New Delhi has cause for fresh alarm, due to some of the activities

being carried out across the border. Intelligence agencies in India have brought to the notice of the government that Pakistan has been frantically building up tunnels in areas not far from the border with India.

According to these inputs, the tunnels have been dug up in the Sargodha district of Pakistani Punjab and can even be noticed by, as a top intelligence officer put it, a discerning eye on Google satellite imagery. “An attempt is being made to establish the purpose of digging up such tunnels which are really big in size. These clearly can’t be meant for transport as is obvious from the images available; unlike ordinary tunnels they don’t lead on to roads,” said the official who is involved in analysing the information.

Pakistan is well within its rights to carry out any construction work on its territory and Islamabad is known to have constructed storage sheds for missiles and weapons in Sargodha, a known nuclear installation, in the past. However, the sheer size of the tunnels and the fact that these don’t seem to be leading on to roads have raised suspicion that these could be used to store nuclear weapons or missiles which are battle ready.

The official said Pakistan has been known to store some of its deadliest, but unassembled, missiles like the Chinese M-11 in a sub-depot near the central ammunition depot in Sargodha. It is also the place where Pakistan’s nuclear capable F-16 aircraft are said to be stationed. Located on the west of Lahore, Sargodha has always been the hub of Pakistan air force and, in fact, is home to its central air command.

If what Pakistan is doing is just a precautionary measure, considering Sargodha is a sensitive nuclear facility under threat from the Taliban and other terrorists, this has not been communicated to India either by Islamabad or the US which is fast taking it upon itself to safeguard all nuclear facilities in the country. In fact, the first attack on a nuclear installation by terrorists in Pakistan took place in Sargodha in November 2007.

According to Indian officials, Pakistan in the past has used Sargodha to store M-11 missiles which had been delivered unassembled to it by China. However, the pace at which these tunnels are coming up suggests that, as the official put it, Pakistan is up to something. Sargodha is also the place which the Chinese are said to regularly visit to train the Pakistanis in handling weapons and missiles.

more about “Pak tunnels near border worry governm…“, posted with vodpod

Sargodha District

Location of Sargodha in Punjab.





More Indian Fear-Mongering

25 01 2010

[The rest of the story?  SEE: Mumbai Police Seized a 5kg. Ball of Uranium, Possibly Headed for Pakistan]

Pakistan planning to smuggle nukes into India through hidden tunnels in case of American invasion
Kiran Chaube
Jan. 24, 2010

Intelligence agencies in India have brought to the notice of the government that Pakistan has been frantically building up tunnels in areas not far from the border with India.

Indian mainstream media has painted these tunnels as means of moving mechanized infantry in a war against India.

In reality these runnels are big and does not resebmble anything that can used for moving mechanized infantry in a war against India. Indian Air Force will be happy to have the end of these tunnels blasted and sealed as concentrated Pakistani mechanized infantry stay burried for ever.

Why is Pakistan building these tunnels then?

Answer lies in wehere these tunnets really end. These tunnels go deep into Indian territory. The ends are well guarded areas protected by sleeping cells of ISI and Al-Queda deep inside India. These are means of transfering the Pakistani Weapons of Mass Destruction in case second Bush like person comes back into power in America and America decides to attack Pakistan like Iraq with false excuses.

Pakistan plans to smuggle the nukes out to India in case America decides to take control of the nukes from the Islamic extremists. These tunnels have very visible start with no end in sight. They are the work of a large secret underground mission that Pakistanis do not want to talk about.





Mumbai gunman demands trial by international court

25 01 2010

Mumbai gunman demands trial by international court

FILE - In this file photograph taken on Wednesday, Nov. 26, 2008, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, the accused gunmen walks at the Chatrapathi Sivaji Terminal railway station in Mumbai, India. The alleged gunman in the 2008 bloody siege of Mumbai said Monday Jan. 25, 2010, he should be tried by an international court because he did not expect justice in India. Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, 21, told a special court that police had falsely implicated him in the case. (AP Photo/Sebastian D'souza/Mumbai Mirror, File)

FILE – In this file photograph taken on Wednesday, Nov. 26, 2008, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, the accused gunmen walks at the Chatrapathi Sivaji Terminal railway station in Mumbai, India. The alleged gunman in the 2008 bloody siege of Mumbai said Monday Jan. 25, 2010, he should be tried by an international court because he did not expect justice in India. Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, 21, told a special court that police had falsely implicated him in the case. (AP Photo/Sebastian D’souza/Mumbai Mirror, File) (Sebastian D’souza – AP)

By RAJESH SHAH

The Associated Press
Monday, January 25, 2010; 5:48 AM

MUMBAI, India — The alleged gunman in the 2008 bloody siege of Mumbai said Monday he should be tried by an international court because he does not expect justice in India.

Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, 21, told a special court that police had falsely implicated him in the case.

“I should be tried in an international court,” he told Judge M.L. Tahiliyani.

Ten gunmen rampaged through India’s commercial capital Mumbai in a commando-style attack on two luxury hotels, a busy train station and a Jewish center in November 2008. The three-day siege left 166 people dead, and nine of the gunmen were killed.

Last month, Kasab retracted his confession that he sprayed gunfire into a crowd at the railroad station. He also said police tortured him into admitting having a role in the attacks.

Kasab also said Monday he wanted to call witnesses from Pakistan for his defense, and that he should be allowed to meet Pakistani officials. Witnesses would include a passport officer, he said, without providing other details.

The judge asked him to file a petition through his attorney.

Kasab could face the death penalty if convicted. Murder and conspiracy to wage war against India are among the charges he faces.

Kasab told the judge he came to Mumbai as a tourist and was arrested 20 days before the siege began.

On the day the attacks started, Kasab said police took him from his cell because he resembled one of the gunmen. They then shot him to make it look as if he had been involved in the attacks and re-arrested him, Kasab said.





US Drone Shot Down in North Waziristan

25 01 2010

[SEE: Report: Pakistan Army Test Anti-Drone Technology dated January 19]

US Drone Shot Down in North Waziristan

MIRAMSHAH: A suspected US drone has been shot down in North Waziristan, sources said Sunday. The local tribesmen have claimed that they fired down the unmanned aircraft in Hamzoni area.

The unmanned aircraft came down in Humzoni area of Datta Khel in North Warisitan bordering Afghanistan, where there have been over 14 drone strikes over the past few weeks.

According to state TV, the drone was shot down while the tribesmen have also claimed that they fired down the pilotless aircraft.

Both the Pakistani and US authorities have maintained a silence on this officially, although it is suspected to be a warning to Langley from Pakistan’s Armed Forces to put an immediate halt to US airspace violations and missile attacks inside Pakistani territory. Relations between the two ‘allies’ appear to have taken a nose-dive in recent days.





Hindu Extremists Looking For a Fight

25 01 2010
Addressing a gathering of Swayam Sevaks here, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat today said India should teach a lesson to Pakistan and take strong steps against China while highlighting the problem of infiltration from Bangladesh.

Bhagwat, who was speaking at an RSS gathering Shahid Minar, also criticised granting of agricultural land for industry and saw a wave of change ushering in Bengal. Interestingly, US Consul General Beth A Payne decided to drop in with her camera at the RSS meet and was seem taking pictures of the event. “Our internal and external security is above politics, but nobody thinks like that. All political parties are looking for vote banks,” Bhagwat said.

The RSS chief also spoke against acquisition of land for industry and farmers getting dependent on genetically-modified seeds. “Why is vast fertile agricultural land given out to big companies? Certain types of seeds are given to farmers which are making them dependent on companies producing them. Sometimes, we try to become Russia, sometime America and sometime China. When will we become Indians?” he said.





Indian War-Mongers, More Hindu Terrorism

25 01 2010

[Just like Israel, any ally of the US enjoys a double standard in world opinion.  They can issue threats and B.S. until they are blue in the face and the Western press will call it “roses,” NOT the terrorism that it really is.  If this man was a Pakistani official, the whole world would be screaming for his head, after making such threats against his neighbors.  The real problem with India, just like its pal Israel, is that they can turn entire classes of people into sub-humans and ignore their basic human needs, while pretending on the world stage that they are “democracies.”] 

RSS chief criticises Pakistan and China

Kolkata, Jan 24 (ANI): Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat has voiced his anguish over Pakistan and China for deceiving mutual faith.

Addressing a gathering of RSS here, Bhagwat criticised Pakistan for its hostile attitude towards Indiadespite the government’s supportive and friendly approach to its neighbour.

Bhagwat said, "Attacks like 26/11 happened on India, Pakistan struck our Parliament, then also India did not say anything, what have we got out of it."
"I read it somewhere that ministers from Pakistan are saying that they cannot guarantee no other terror attack on India," added Bhagwat.
Bhagwat further said India should teach a lesson to Pakistan and take strong steps against China while highlighting the problem of infiltration from Bangladesh.
Bhagwat expressed apprehensions about China and suggested all efforts should be made to stop China usurping the Indian territory.
The RSS chief accused China of betraying India in the name of friendship, usurping the northeastern land seeking influence in the Indian territories.





Contradictions of Gates

25 01 2010

Contradictions of Gates

US secretary of defence Robert Gates has come and gone, after making the noises so pet with American officials nowadays about Pakistan. But hadn’t we heard of this American prattle even when they were fighting a proxy war against the Soviet invaders in Afghanistan? Didn’t they declare us even then the frontline state of their war, which we actually had become foolishly, thanks to a military dictator, General Ziaul Haq, who threw this unfortunate nation into that foray to be clobbered and bled just to earn international legitimacy for his own illegitimate usurpation of power? Weren’t we then too charmed by Washington with hymns of strategic partnerships and long-term relationships? Weren’t we then too pledged $4.2 billion in US military and economic aid?

What came of all that once the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan? Well, we don’t want to recall that sorrowful history, lest we embitter the sweet taste of Islamabad’s hierarchs, rollicking in such a binge of exultation and celebration as if they have pulled off a feat that no Halaku Khan of this earth could. Otherwise, the way we are being dealt by protagonists of this America’s so-called war on terror befits not a partner or an ally but only an exalted valet. And for the humiliating conditions on which the Kerry-Lugar Law has sanctioned US aid for Pakistan, not even a third-rate leadership would touch it, even if all charity.  But let it pass. If our leadership feels so happy about all this, why to spoil its feel-good mood. After all, over the time this wretched nation has swallowed many an ignoble dignity inflicted on it by Americans for its leaderships’ pleasure. This poisoned chalice too it will gulp up for its present leadership to be happy.

Presently, it is secretary Gates’ discourse that we want to talk about. So nice of him to confess after the Soviet withdrawal the United States committed in the region a strategic mistake “driven by some well-intentioned but short-sighted US legislative and policy decisions”. But his confession is a stark understatement. For, as far as Pakistan is concerned, this wasn’t a US strategic mistake, not even a blunder. It was a callous and deliberate betrayal of a US-declared frontline state, which was clamped down with every nuclear-related sanction and every kind of embargo known to the American statute book and also robbed of its hard-earned money it had paid out from its own pocket for the F-16 planes never delivered to it for sanctions.

But, then, Gates’ own discourse was full of contradictions. While he harangued Pakistan that Taliban were all chips of the same block and couldn’t be compartmentalised into good and bad guys, his own people in Afghanistan are going by this categorisation. What they call moderate Taliban, they admit trying wooing over. Not only are they talking to them. At their behest, Afghan President Hamid Karzai has also unveiled a plan to buy off wavering Taliban with money and jobs. So what he wants Pakistan not to do, his people are themselves doing exactly this in Afghanistan. Isn’t it an outright hypocrisy, and also mean doublespeak and double standards?

Then, all fraught is his assertion that no matter wherever al-Qaeda raises its head, the epicentre of this monstrosity is the border land between Afghanistan and Pakistan, which if translated into plain language only means Pakistan’s North Waziristan Agency. This plainly is a misleading and specious statement. The 9/11 was not planned in North Waziristan, not even in Afghanistan. It was planned in the German city of Hamburg and was executed by Saudi, Egyptian and other Arab students, who had studied in Western universities and trained in America’s aviation academies.

Even the Nigerian underwear bomber who attempted a foiled blasting of an American airliner may have stayed in Yemen learning Arabic, but he believably got radicalised in London where he was long studying engineering. North Waziristan he had never visited. But such uncomfortable things never torment an American conscience as doesn’t the clarifications Gates touted with a straight about the presence in Pakistan of the thuggish American private security outfit of Blackwater. His clarifications were more a confirmation than a denial. This outfit of mercenary killers may not be on his Pentagon’s or State Department’s payrolls. But it is the CIA which enrolls and pays them. And Blackwater is heavily represented in about 100,000 hired killers CIA has on its payrolls in Afghanistan alone. The number may not be lesser in Pakistan where CIA has had a free run for years.

But if the Americans have to be duplicitous, cunning and deceivers to us, do our own people have to be so to their own compatriots? For months, interior minister Rehman Malik has been lying to this nation that Blackwater exists not in this country. Even accosting his challengers he has been to prove him wrong and he will resign. Now he must. Gates with his evasive but confirmatory versions has proved him to be a liar and a big cheat deceiving his own people.





UK Conference On Afghanistan That Nobody Wants

25 01 2010

UK seeks India help to nudge US

Jayanth Jacob , Hindustan Times

The London Conference on Afghanistan has hit a bump and the UK, the host, has sought India’s help to get the US on board for the meet that will discuss among other things a “regional stabilisation council”.

The conference, planned for January 28, is based on the British idea of regional players, including India, Pakistan, Iran, China and Russia, becoming stakeholders in the peace process.

The UK — which sought Indian intervention ahead of US Defence Secretary Robert Gates’ recent visit to Delhi — it is learnt, has told India that the Chinese response has been “frustrating”. While Iran has set some stringent conditions, both Russia and the US are not too keen on the council.
Pakistan has already made known its opposition to India being part of such an arrangement.

India, too, is not exactly excited. It had sought UK’s intervention after it was left out of a conference being held on January 26 in Istanbul in the run-up to the London met.
The British foreign office, it is learnt, told India that the Afghan conference was their prime minister’s initiative. In other words, it conveyed “constrains about India” seeking participation in the Istanbul meet, where Pakistan is an invitee.
Pakistan has been against any role for India in Afghanistan. With $1.3 billion aid, India is one of the biggest donors for the war-ravaged  country.

The UK is keen that the regional compact, which will also have Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan on board, is in place when the US troops pullout begins in June 2011. With the US at the forefront of events in that country, its support is a must for the success of such an effort.

As a neighbour, and a Saarc (South Asian Association for regional Conference) partner, stakes were high for India as far as stable and prosperous Afghanistan was concerned, said a government official.
“It has a direct bearing on the entire region, and the same view has been conveyed to the US,” said the official who didn’t want to be identified as he is not authorised to speak to the media.





Indo-Pak tensions loom over London conference on Afghanistan

25 01 2010

Indo-Pak tensions loom over London conference on Afghanistan

New Delhi, Jan. 25 (ANI): Signalling undercurrent and simmering tensions in the India-Pakistan relations following the IPL row and a rise in ceasefire violations, Indian Foreign Minister S M Krishna and his Pakistani counterpart Shah Mehmood Qureshi will be attending the London conference on Afghanistan on January 28, but will not have a separate bilateral meeting on the sidelines of the conference, according to sources.

This is very rare and unusual in the context of Indo-Pak relations and reflects the prevailing discord between the two neighbours.

Sources, however,have confirmed that Krishna will hold separate meetings with US secretary of State Hillary Clinton, British Foreign Secretary David Miliband and Australian Foreign Minister Stephen Smith.
The London Conference on Afghanistan will be an occasion which India could use to showcase its massive humanitarian efforts in war-ravaged countries, which many diplomats believe is "undervalued" and little understood by the international community.
India is providing aid worth 1.3 billion USD to improve infrastructure, education and medical health of the beleaguered country.
Recently, US have lauded India’s effort. Britain has said it is taking lessons from Indian initiatives in Afghanistan.
Pakistan on the other hand, continues to remain skeptical about Indian efforts and has yet not opened transit route for Indian goods to pass through its soil into the land locked Afghanistan.
India which is the largest regional donor to Afghanistan is also expected to announce a new initiative on agriculture during the conference, but has apprehensions over the event coming out with any significant outcome, though more than 27 countries are attending it with divergent views.
India will be a prominent voice at the conference because the West believes that with its economic power and regional clout, India, Russia and Iran could play a vital role in shaping the future of Afghanistan. The West is also urging China to take a keen interest, share the burden and get involved in the building up of Afghanistan.
India has time and again blamed Pakistan for sheltering terrorists on its soil and has made it clear to the US and NATO that until these sanctuaries exist, permanent peace for Afghanistan could prove elusive.
India has repeatedly drawn world attention to Pakistan’s covert support to the terrorist organizations, while Islamabad has been blaming India for supporting insurgents in Balochistan through its consulates in Afghanistan.
Diplomatic sources say this issue is unlikely to be raised during the conference. Only development-related issues and initiatives will be taken up by the participating countries.
Karzai’s proposal of reconciliation with Taliban is expected to come up at the conference. By Naveen Kapoor (ANI)





Turkey Hosts Zardari Karzai

25 01 2010

Talks with Taliban loom over Pakistani-Afghan summit

Simon Cameron-Mooreand Zerin Elci

An Afghan policeman stands in front of the shopping mall, where Taliban gunmen battled security forces for hours, as the government forces restored control after the attack in Kabul January 18, 2010. REUTERS/Omar Sobhani

ISTANBUL (Reuters) – The leaders of Afghanistan and Pakistan will seek closer cooperation in the fight against militants during a summit in Istanbul on Monday, but a plan to reach out to Taliban insurgents will likely dominate the talks.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari meet ahead of a London conference where Afghanistan and the international community are set to agree a framework for Kabul to take responsibility for its own security.

The two men will hold a bilateral meeting before three-way talks with host President Abdullah Gul of Turkey, which has been working behind the scenes to repair relations between Islamabad and Kabul, notably over negotiations with the Taliban.

"We have been working with the Afghans and the Pakistanis on this," said a Turkish official who asked not to be named.

Pakistan has long played an important role in Afghan affairs, having nurtured the Afghan Taliban during the 1990s, but Kabul remains suspicious that Islamabad is pursuing its own agenda in the country to the detriment of Afghanistan.

Despite battling its own Pakistan Taliban insurgency it has been reluctant to tackle the Afghan Taliban, believing it might need them to counter regional rival India’s growing influence in the country should U.S.-led forces withdraw.

Karzai, under intense pressure from his Western backers to strengthen Afghanistan’s security forces at a time of worsening violence, is preparing a program to reintegrate some Taliban insurgents in order to encourage them to lay down arms.

Pakistan is seeking to play a role in that process. The Foreign Ministry said on Saturday it was reaching out to "all levels" of the Afghan Taliban in a bid to encourage peace in its neighbor.

After arriving in Istanbul late on Sunday, Zardari met Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan, who has raised Turkey’s profile and clout in the Muslim world since his Islamist-rooted AK Party took power in 2002. Erdogan met Karzai separately.

REGIONAL PLAYERS

U.S. President Barack Obama, who is sending 30,000 extra troops to Afghanistan, has said a political solution was needed to stabilize Afghanistan and has emphasized that success would not be possible without the support of Pakistan.

Ahead of the international conference in London, Turkey is hosting a meeting of Afghanistan’s neighbors on Tuesday to seek a common approach to the conflict.

British officials say they want to persuade regional players to work together to help stabilize Afghanistan.

Turkey has said foreign ministry officials from Iran, China, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Pakistan will attend as well as British Foreign Secretary David Miliband and U.S. Special envoy Richard Holbrooke’s deputy, Paul Jones.





Pakistan Army Test Anti-Drone Technology

24 01 2010

Report: Pakistan Army Test Anti-Drone Technology

The Air Defence Unit of the Pakistan Army has conducted a successful experiment, downing drones in the Khudai Range near Muzaffargarh, according to a Pakistani daily.

Pakistan Air Defence Unit Commander Lt.-Gen. Ashraf Saleem revealed that four drones were downed with the help of 35mm radar, laser guns and 127mm guns. He said that the Air Defence Unit is equipped with the latest system that has the capability of downing every kind of drone, according to a report in The Post.

Pakistan will continue undertaking such exercises to strengthen the air defense of the country, Saleem said, adding that the demonstration of capability by the Pakistani soldiers has increased his confidence.

Commenting on the test, Brigadier (retired) Masood said that Pakistan has the capability of downing drones but the government does not want to spoil relations with the United States.

Source: The Post, Pakistan, January 19, 2010





American Embassy Employee Held in Two Bombings

24 01 2010

The Nation has learnt that on November 18 [2009], a gentleman working
for the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad, Mr. Abdul Ghafoor, (see photocopy
of his U.S. ID card), was stopped by [Pakistan] naval police and intelligence personnel in the morning as he was suspiciously monitoring the entry/exit of Zafar gate (at Zafar Chowk) and doing reconnaissance work on naval installations.

Unfortunately, the police high-ups did a double-cross on the [Pakistan] Navy by registering the case under PPC 420 468/471, dealing in fake documentation, etc., instead of registering the case under the [Pakistan] 1923 Official Secrets Act for [unlawful] spying, which carries a much stronger penalty.

This has led to some debate and conflict amongst the concerned agencies and one has to wonder where the pressure on the [Islamabad] police [which works under the Pakistan Interior Ministry led by PPP corrupt traitors A. Rehman Malik and Tasneem Ahmed Qureshi] came from for them to have diluted a very serious issue despite the clear accusations in the FIR (see copy).

http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Politics/04-Dec-2009/US-surveillance-of-Naval-HQs

Paramilitary man held for WFP suicide bombing

Rehman Malik did not reveal the identity of the man, but said he was also involved in the suicide attack outside the PN's headquarters. — File Photo by APP
Rehman Malik did not reveal the identity of the man, but said he was also involved in the suicide attack outside the PN’s headquarters. — File Photo by APP

ISLAMABAD: Interior Minister Rehman Malik said on Saturday that a paramilitary soldier had been arrested for his alleged involvement in the Oct 5 suicide attack on the UN food agency’s office in Islamabad that killed five of its staffers.

The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan had claimed responsibility for targeting the World Food Programme, saying the agency’s work was not in “the interest of Muslims”.

The minister did not reveal the identity of the man, but said he was also involved in the Dec 2 suicide attack outside the Pakistan Navy’s headquarters in Islamabad that killed one guard and wounded 11 others. Talking to journalists, Mr Malik ruled out the presence of controversial firm Blackwater in Pakistan. “I state again with full responsibility and as per available record that there is no Blackwater in the country. A hype is being created.”   [Blackwater in Pakistan: Gates Confirms]

He challenged those claiming the US firm’s presence to prove it through documents.

In reply to a question, the minister said that Ajmal Kasab, the lone surviving terrorist in the Mumbai attacks, was being tried by an Indian court for the last one year. “We respect their (Indian) courts and they must respect ours,” he said with reference to Indian allegations on Hafiz Saeed, the head of Jamaatud Dawa.—AP/APP





Pakistan Nails RAW Terrorist Facilitator in Nowshera Raid

24 01 2010

Afghan national spying for RAW held in Nowshera raid

By Mushtaq Paracha

NOWSHERA: The Crimes Investigation Department (CID) and intelligence agencies in a joint action arrested an Indian agent and recovered foreign currency, documents and satellite phone and computer sets from his possession in Hakimabad near here on Saturday.

Badshah alias Sharif, an Afghan national, was reportedly involved in a number of criminal cases besides providing funds to terrorists for carrying out sabotage activities in various parts of the province, official sources told The News.

The sources said that a team of the CID police and sleuths of the country’s premier intelligence agency raided a house in Hakimabad, a town near Nowshera Cantonment, and arrested the agent of Research and Analysis Wing (RAW).

Foreign currency of 60,000 US dollars, three satellite phones, laptop, computer software and important documents were also recovered from the accused. The arrest was made on the pointation of an Afghan peshimam (prayer leader) Maulvi Hanif who was apprehended by the intelligence agencies from a sensitive place in Peshawar.

Maulvi Hanif was performing duty as prayer leader in a mosque in Peshawar Cantonment area for the last 14 years. According to Maulvi Hanif, he was an Afghan national and a member of RAW gang and had dozens of accomplices who were operating in sensitive areas.





Gates’ Denial of Indian Intentions to Assimilate Pakistan

24 01 2010

[The one "existential" threat to Pakistan comes from India.]

Focus on western border, Gates tells Islamabad

Islamabad: The United States has asked Pakistan to shift its greater security role to the western border with Afghanistan as it is there that it faces an “existential threat” rather than on the frontier with India.

The visiting Defence Secretary, Robert Gates, has said Pakistan should commit itself to a greater role on its western border. He made these remarks during an interview with the state-run Pakistan Television while responding to questions why Washington believes Islamabad should commit itself to a greater role on its western borders.

“Well, I think… because it faces, in its own way, an existential threat on its western border,” Mr. Gates said.

Asked if there was no threat to Pakistan on the eastern border with India, he replied: “I said we understood Pakistan’s legitimate concerns. It also has an existential threat on its western border, and that is the more immediate threat.” — PTI





The Delusion That Racist India Is Light Unto Nations

24 01 2010

India can fuel next industrial revolution

Shyam Ranganathan

Maldives President for partnership among Asian countries to take on challenges

India can provide the lead in use of renewable energy

‘G-20, rather than G-8, has to respond to challenges’


— Photo: V. Ganesan

President of the Maldives Mohamed Nasheed addresses the CII’s Partnership Summit 2010 in Chennai on Saturday.

CHENNAI: India has the intellectual capacity, strength and ability to fuel the next industrial revolution, Maldives President Mohamed Nasheed said here on Saturday. He also called for partnership among Asian countries to take on global challenges.

Mr. Nasheed was delivering the keynote address at the 16th edition of the Partnership Summit, organised by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII).

He said India could provide the lead in use of renewable energy to combat climate change. “We did not advance out of the Stone Age because we ran out of stones,” he quipped. The world could not assume that there was still a future with fossil fuels.

Good governance

Democracy and good governance were essential for development and this prompted the Maldivian government to move towards a liberal economic regime.

“We believe in business over bureaucracy.” The government’s rightful place in the globalised world was in regulation, environment protection and provision of social security nets, he said.

Reading out the Malaysian Prime Minister’s address to the summit, International Trade and Industry Minister of that country Mustapa bin Mohamed said greater global economic integration was unavoidable but it was fraught with dangers to the disadvantaged.

“A value-free process”

Globalisation was a value-free process and it would make sense only if it was used to alleviate poverty and improve human lives.

“Globalisation is about change and the ability to respond to change. Countries differ in this regard and there should be flexibility in how we assess their ability to promote economic integration across borders,” he said.

While conceding that the World Trade Organisation, with all its imperfections, would continue to provide the framework for nations to discuss and negotiate, he called for a rules-based system, where wealthy nations would not overpower developing nations and where rules facilitated growth and greater economic integration.

Shift in economic power

Union Commerce Minister Anand Sharma said the economic and political power in the world was shifting and the G-20, rather than the G-8, had to respond to challenges.

India wanted a multilateral regime that was fair, equitable and met the needs of the poorest people, and would push for it in the next instalment of the Doha Round talks, he said.

Stalin’s call

Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister M.K. Stalin said the State was among the top three fastest growing ones in the country and invited industries to invest in the State.

CII president Venu Srinivasan said the shifting of the economic centre of gravity to Asia would have implications for the entire world in food and energy security.





India Importing Russian Uranium for New Reactor, Under US Agreement

24 01 2010

India’s 19th nuclear reactor becomes operational

Press Trust of India

India’s 19th nuclear power reactor went into operation on Saturday night at the Rajasthan Atomic Power Plant near Kota, giving a boost to availability of electricity in North India.

The indigenous reactor of Rajasthan Atomic Power Project (RAPP-6) at Rawat Bhata, near Kota, attained its first criticality at 21:53 hrs on Saturday, posting a major milestone in the project completion process.

Rajasthan Atomic Power Project 5 and 6 comprises of two Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs) of 220MW each. The first unit, RAPP-5 achieved first synchronisation on December 22, 2009 and RAPP- 6, the second unit, an indigenous nuclear power reactor has now joined the fleet of 18 nuclear power reactors in operation.

With the operation of RAPP 5 and 6, the installed capacity has risen to 1180MW. The power will be shared by the beneficiaries of Northern Electricity Grid. Both Units 5 and 6 of RAPP are using uranium imported from Russia and are under India-specific safeguards agreement of International Atomic Energy Agency as per the separation plan of military and civilian nuclear power plants agreed under the landmark Indo-US civil nuclear deal.

With the operationalisation of RAPP6, the overall installed capacity of nuclear power in India has gone up to 4560MW. The reactors have been designed and built by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL), a public sector undertaking under the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE). The Indian industry has played a major role in supply of critical equipment and in meeting construction schedules, Ranjit Raj Kakde, General Manager (Corporate Communications), said in a release.

The total nuclear power capacity is planned to be increased to 7280MW by completion of projects under construction in Karnataka (Kaiga 4) and Tamil Nadu (Koodankulam units 1 and 2). The long-term plans are to take the capacity close to 60,000MW through diverse reactors technologies and designs.

NPCIL is unique in having comprehensive capacity in the various facets of nuclear technology namely site selection, design, construction, commissioning, operation, maintenance and life extension of nuclear power plants, Kakade said. PHWRs use natural uranium as a fuel and heavy water both as moderator and coolant.

Meanwhile, NPCIL, as part of its expansion plan of PHWRs, has designed 700MW PHWRs based on the experience of its540 MW built in Tarapur. Four 700MW PHWRs, including two at Rawat Bhata site, have been approved by government and construction is being taken up. These are slated for completion with a gestation period of 60 months.





India Plans to Use Cruise Missile Swarms Like US Uses Drones

24 01 2010

Army plans induction of BrahMos with ‘surgical strike’ option

Rajat Pandit, TNN, 24 January 2010, 01:30am IST

NEW DELHI: Army is going in for a major induction of BrahMos Block-II land-attack cruise missiles (LACM), which have been designed as “precision

strike weapons” capable of hitting small targets in cluttered urban environments.

Sources say the defence ministry will “soon” approach the Cabinet Committee on Security, chaired by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, for the green signal to arm the Army with two regiments of the BrahMos Block-II land-attack cruise missiles (LACM).

Swift induction of BrahMos Block-II is necessary because Pakistan Army is inducting its nuclear-capable Babur LACM, developed with China’s help to have a 500-km strike range, in large numbers. BrahMos-II can potentially be used for “surgical strikes” at terror training camps across the border without causing collateral damage.

One regiment of the 290-km range BrahMos-I variant,  which consists of 67 missiles, five mobile autonomous launchers on 12×12 Tatra vehicles and two mobile command posts, among other equipment, is already operational in the Army. It had earlier ordered two BrahMos regiments in the first phase at a cost of Rs 8,352 crore.

The BrahMos Block-II variant has been developed to take out a specific small target, with a low radar cross-section, in a multi-target environment.

The air-breathing missile, which flies at speeds up to 2.8 Mach (almost three times the speed of sound), of course, does not come cheap. With `multi-spectral seekers’ for `target-discriminating capabilities’, each missile costs upwards of Rs 25 crore.

Incidentally, Indian Navy too has inducted BrahMos’s naval variant on some warships, having earlier placed orders worth Rs 711 crore for 49 firing units.

While these missiles are fired from `inclined launchers’, Navy is also gearing up to induct `vertical launchers’.

This is significant since `vertical launchers’ are fitted under the warship’s deck, protecting them from the atmospheric conditions and imparting some stealth to the weapon system. It also allows the missile to be fired in any direction.

Two such modules, with 16 missiles, are to fitted in each of the three Kolkata-class P-15A destroyers being built at Mazagon Docks at a cost of Rs 11,662 crore.

BrahMos will also arm the three more Talwar-class `stealth’ frigates being built at Yantar shipyard in Kaliningrad (Russia) under a Rs 5,514-crore project.

But the work on submarine and air-launched versions of BrahMos is still going quite slow. While talks with Russia are now in the final stages for BrahMos’ integration with Sukhoi-30MKI fighters, the missile will be tested for the first time from submersible pontoon launchers this year in preparation for their induction on submarines.

India and Russia have also begun preliminary work on a “hypersonic” BrahMos-2 missile capable of flying at a speed between 5 and 7 Mach, as reported earlier.

The armed forces’ eventual plan, of course, is to have nuclear-tipped LACMs, with strike ranges over 1,500 km. Unlike ballistic missiles like Agni, cruise missiles do not leave the atmosphere and are powered and guided throughout their flight path.

Cruise missiles, which can evade enemy radars and air defence systems since they fly at low altitudes, are also much cheaper as well as more accurate and easier to operate than ballistic missiles.





CALL FOR IMMEDIATE ARREST OF 5 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES FOR TREASON

24 01 2010

CALL FOR IMMEDIATE ARREST OF 5 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES FOR TREASON

Constitution in flamesTHE FIVE THAT STAND AGAINST ALL AMERICANS, THE “MAFIA” JUDGES

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

Five members of the Supreme Court declared that a “corporation” is a person, not a “regular person” but one above all natural laws, subject to no God, no moral code but one with unlimited power over our lives, a power awarded by judges who seem themselves as grand inquisitors in an  meant to hunt down all hertics who fail to serve their god, the god of money.

Their ruling has made it legal for foreign controlled corporations to flush unlimited money into our bloated political system to further corrupt something none of us trust and most of us fear.  The “corporation/person” that the 5 judges, the “neocon” purists, have turned the United States over to isn’t even American.  Our corporations, especially since our economic meltdown are owned by China, Russia and the oil sheiks along with a few foreign banks.  They don’t vote, pay taxes, fight in wars, need dental care, breathe air, drive cars or send children to school.  Anyone who thinks these things are people is insane.  Anyone who would sell our government to them is a criminal and belongs in prison.  There is nothing in the Constitution that makes this “gang of five” bribe sucking clowns above the law.  There is nothing in the Constitution that even mentions corporations much less gives them status equal to or greater than the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of government.

The Supreme Court of the United States has no right to breathe human life into investment groups owned by terrorist sympathizers, foreign arms dealers or groups working for the downfall of the United States and everything we believe in, but 5 “justices” have done just that.  We now have a new government above our government, above our people, one above any law.   Five judges have created institutionalized gangsterism as the new form of government for the United States.

No American soldier can ever go to war fighting for a Chinese hedge fund, a German bank or a Saudi Arabian fertilizer company.  Will our new debates in Congress be between members representing the opium warlords against the Columbian cartels?  Their cash, which long ago has infiltrated one major corporation or bank after another is now heading for your local representative.   How important do you think secure borders for America are for these new policial “influencers?”

For years we complained about AIPAC, the Sierra Club, the NRA, trial lawyers, trade unions, NAM (National Association of Manufacturers) and the churches that got involved in politics.  Behind all of these were people, American citizens, and, on some occasions, Americans who fought for their country, raised kids here and were invested in the survival of America although they didn’t always act that way.  This was an American problem.  Now we aren’t even sure we have an America anymore.

Anyone who believes that a massive flood of corporate money into politics won’t throw control of both houses of Congress into the hands of the wealthy nations that are also our primary strategic enemies, you know the ones, the ones loaded with oil cash, the ones with 10 cent an hour labor and legal systems that  shoot first and ask questions later.  They just were told they can buy the United States, not just our government, but our military, and the lives of our soldiers.  They can now make our laws, raise our taxes, decide on our civil rights, where we can live, if we can own guns, how late we stay up, where and what we drive and, eventually, how we think.  The Supreme Court has given foreign owned corporations the eventual power to silence us all.

When a corporation commits a crime, nobody goes to jail.  When wars come, they don’t fight, they simply rake in cash.  When children are poisoned or workers are killed, they seldom even pay a fine.  However, when they want something, billions in tax money for “bail outs” or fat contracts or special laws, they have always gotten it.  It  has been a battle to control corporations for 140 years.  Sometimes the American people have lost, sometimes they have won.  Our greatest presidents are the ones who reined in corporate power and kept the influence of money over humanity in check.  Think of Theordore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower and John Kennedy.

Without them we would be living in work camps, stuck at machines all day, our children at our sides.  We would be paid in beans and salt pork, dying at 40 in filth like people around the world who live in countries controlled by corporations.

Based on the justices that we want prosecuted being Reagan/Bush “conservatives” you would think this is a liberal/conservative issue.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  Nothing less “conservative” has ever been done by a branch of our government.  There is nothing “conservative” about our Supreme Court going insane and abandoning our Constitution and making medical decisions, not to give life to a fetus, but to a bank account.

This is nothing but an extremely unAmerican and unpatriotic group of thieves believing that Americans had given up so many of their civil liberties in silence during the Global War on Terror scam that opening the “Pandora’s Box” of class conflict could now be done with nobody saying a word.  Their “corporate person” is now a Baron or Duke, the great landlords of the medieval period.  Americans are now destined for serfdom.  Their political and economic theories, what are they?  Is it conservatism or feudalism?

We are already burdened with a representative government that has tied itself to the money spigot because of the incredible cost of media exposure in campaigns.  People running for office in ancient Rome would purchase thousands of animals for slaughter in the arena.  Mass executions were staged as media events for political campaigns.  In fact, the arenas in every Roman city were built for that purpose, today replaced by television and the internet.  We thought we had changed since that time.  We were wrong.

The framers of the Constitution created the Supreme Court, the Electoral College and originally had Senators appointed, not elected, to protect the wealthy from having their money and land seized by the masses who would otherwise have controlled the government.  This was the 1780s.  The only “democracy” we knew about was ancient Athens, where the majority of the people living there were slaves.    27 Amendments later, including the Bill of Rights, we have worked to define justice and decency.  Generations have fought and died to keep life in our imperfect system from 1780.  Who would have thought that 5 people could destroy it all?

Political debate in America is sometimes extreme, often bordering on violence.  Feelings are high.  How many times have you heard people threaten to leave the country because “their America” no longer exists.  We know that few really mean it.  When faced with a real threat, no people on earth are to be feared like Americans.  When help is needed, no people on earth are to be trusted and relied on like Americans.  This is the pride we have in our country and ourselves.  We never agree on anything.  We aren’t supposed to, we are Americans.

Everything we built has been based on a balance, race, religion, ethnicity, social standing, political beliefs, regional interests, all striving and compromising to build something we are all secretly very proud of, something all of us are willing to fight for and many are.  Americans all agree on one thing, that our government in Washington is out of control and has been for some time.  We all have different ideas on this but agree on the fact itself.  We wonder where the politicians come from, men too often “less great” than those of the past, in fact, less great than average.  Decisions are continually made that most find puzzling and, in fact, are driven by a rotten underbelly of corruption and self interest.

Now, 5 members of the Supreme Court, people none of us voted for, a group that is answerable to no authority and, seemingly, no law or moral code, a group famous for immoderation, poor judgement and low personal integrity has, either through blindness, avarice or insanity clearly done something so malicious, so unjust and so utterly inconsistent with our Constitution that they, themselves, have become an “enemy of the people.”

What is their power?  What they have done is not within the scope of the authority given through the Constitution.  Their acts are outside the law, their acts are those of a conspiracy, their acts are meant to diminish our freedoms, our sacred institutions and even endanger our lives.  Typically, such acts are called crimes and those who commit them are criminals.

What could drive judges, albeit judges appointed with little thought as part of a cheap political ploy, to abandon any American consitutency?  Corporations have no religion.  They care nothing for the unborn.  They have no allegiance to a flag, a family or any moral ethic.  They serve no person, owe no loyalty other that to stockholders, shadowy groups of Russian oligarchs, Chinese banks, corrupt dictators grown fat on the spoils of their people or the international consortiums of bond and currency speculators who have, for decades, abandoned any economic law to build the etherial “house of cards” we call the “world economy.”

The control of the American electoral process has been given to them.  No serving politican can survive now standing against them.  Years ago “they” bought our newspapers and our television networks.  Fact and truth became whatever they wanted us to believe.  “They” gained control of what many thought and what almost all of us see and hear.  That wasn’t enough.  They wanted it all.  As their control has grown, so has terrorism, continual war, economic poverty for millions Americans and insensitivity to justice and humanity.  Who would expect anything else from a corporation with no blood, no heart and no face?

The Founding Fathers led America on the path to freedom and eventual democracy.  The Federalists limited the ability of an impetuous electorate to seize power and “reform” America into chaos and anarchy.  This system of government was predicated on the belief that love of country would always burn brightly in America and with progress, freedom and bounty was the ineviable reward of our industry.  It is only now too obvious that so much has happened that was unforseen.  It is not a denial of our traditions to correct wrongs when we find them.  This was how America was created.  We are drowning in wrongs, we all finally agree on this.

The time is now.  Party politics have failed.  Political theories are little more than empty rhetoric meant to mislead and misinform.  State has become church and church has become state.  State is less just and church less godly.  All we have left is “we, the People.”  This is how we began and it is now all we have to move forward.  It is time for the states to call for a Constitutional Convention to establish, not just a Republic, but a Democracy, by and for the people, the American people, rich and poor, a nation loyal to itself, not tied to corporations, a vast military industrial complex or endless foreign alliances.

If it is to be a genuinely conservative nation, one with individual freedoms, a small government, fewer taxes and more opportunity, a nation as intended, then we will all have to live with it.  The bloated corpse we are creating in Washington is emitting a stench we can no longer abide.  We will be saying goodbye to our Supreme Court, our seniority system in Congress and our political machines pretending to be “parties”  and hello to paper ballots, a free press, term limits and the ability to yank a scoundrel out of office when we catch one.





First a blinding flash

24 01 2010

First a blinding flash

Then the mushrooming authority of the president, unbalancing separation of powers in national defense

(Tomasz Walenta)
By Glenn C. AltschulerGlobe Correspondent / January 24, 2010

When the test bomb, code-named Trinity, was detonated in the New Mexico desert, physicist Richard Feynman did a victory dance with his bongo drums. And when Dorothy McKibben, the office manager who served as a kind of gatekeeper at Los Alamos, heard that a nuclear device had been exploded at Hiroshima, she turned to her son and exclaimed, “That’s our Bomb.’’ President Truman agreed, calling it “the greatest thing in history.’’

And yet, as Garry Wills, the provocative, prolific, and polymath professor of history emeritus at Northwestern University, reminds us, the bomb proved to be “a fatal miracle.’’ Fatal as a weapon – and fatal to the delicate system of checks and balances over the power of the presidency. In “Bomb Power,’’ Wills argues that the Manhattan Project, which proceeded without authorization, funding, or oversight by Congress, planted the seeds of a massive shift of power to the executive branch. From World War II to the Cold War and later the War on Terror, “the permanent emergency’’ initially claimed by Truman was used to justify a monopoly by the executive branch on the use of nuclear weapons, the establishment of military bases around the world, the formation of intelligence agencies, the launching of covert operations, and a vast expansion of state secrets. For seven decades, he concludes, what Wills refers to as the National Security State “has made the abnormal normal and constitutional diminishment the settled order.’’

Although it breaks no new ground, “Bomb Power’’ is a powerful – and sobering – account of the step-by-step creation of government structures, unaccountable to Congress or the people, to conduct “permanent war in peace.’’ The culprits, Wills points out, were Democratic as well as Republican presidents, who engineered a quiet coup against the Constitution, making the commander-in-chief of the armed forces the commander-in-chief of the nation. And the post-Vietnam, post-Watergate reining in of “the imperials presidency,’’ through the War Powers Resolution (1973), the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (1978), and the Presidential Records Act (1978), never really happened.

The Korean War, according to Wills, whose eyes are on Iraq, set many precedents. Although North Korea posed no nuclear threat to the United States, Truman insisted that he could commit troops to a major and sustained conflict, under the “aegis’’ of the United Nations, without a congressional declaration of war. Even hearings on a resolution of approval, Secretary of State Dean Acheson declared, would open up the possibility of criticism that would undermine the morale of troops. In fact, Truman dispatched the Seventh Fleet to the region before the Security Council acted. In doing so, Wills writes, the president violated Article 41 of the UN Charter, which stipulates that Congress must approve any commitment of American troops for a UN-sponsored mission.

Along with the evisceration of Congress’ power to declare war, Wills demonstrates, government secrecy grew “like a giant radiation emission.’’ Control of information, of course, is a source and sign of power. It allows presidents to dismiss critics as “ill-informed.’’ It also permits government officials to cover up acts of incompetence or criminality that have nothing to do with national security. The Pentagon Papers, of course, is the perfect example. So is the less-well-known story of the explosion of an Air Force plane doing experimental work on a guided missile system in 1948. When the widows of three crewmen sued, citing trouble with fires on B29s, the Air Force refused to release its official accident report, which had been classified. The clear implication was that national security secrets about the missile system might be jeopardized. In United States v. Reynolds et al (1953), the Supreme Court refused to order the government to turn over the documents or to pay damages to the plaintiffs. More than 50 years later, the 220-page report saw the light of day. It said nothing at all about the missile program – instead it told a horrific story of a plane without heat shields and a pilot who inadvertently shut off the wrong engine.

Like many other critics of the National Security State, Wills believes that George W. Bush brought “executive usurpations to their climax.’’ He makes a compelling case that the “unitary theory of the presidency,’’ which gives the executive the power to launch a pre-emptive war, bypass laws requiring court approval to conduct domestic surveillance, detain terrorists indefinitely without charging or trying them, carry out “renditions,’’ and authorize “enhanced interrogation techniques’’ that violate the Geneva Conventions, is “philological hocus-pocus.’’

Wills, it appears, has already given up hope that Barack Obama will make substantive changes to the National Security State. Administration officials, he observes, have already indicated that they reserve the right to use “extraordinary renditions,’’ subject terrorists captured anywhere to “battlefield law,’’ and invoke the Reynolds case to abort trial proceedings that involve “state secrets.’’ Obama said the government would not prosecute any officials of the Bush administration or empanel a “truth commission.’’ “Most important,’’ the president is committed to “a long-term nation-building effort in Afghanistan, a drug-culture government not susceptible to our remolding.’’ The self-professed change agent, Wills concludes, has “grabbed at the powers, the secrecy, the unaccountability’’ of the “imperial system.’’

Dismantling the National Security State is, indeed, “a hard, perhaps impossible task.’’ But it’s worth remembering that even if, to some extent, Obama is the prisoner of his own power, he isn’t George W. Bush. By the time he’s done, many things millions of Americans care passionately about – torture, indefinite detention, the denial of habeas corpus and legal representation, the unilateral abrogation of treaties, defiance of Congress, distortions of the Constitution, and the rewriting of statutes through signing statements – may no longer be acceptable practices of the federal government. In the end, Wills suggests, principled reformers should continue the fight despite the odds, invoking the spirit of Cyrano de Bergerac who said: “One fights not only in the hope of winning.’’

Glenn C. Altschuler is the Thomas and Dorothy Litwin professor of American studies at Cornell University.

© Copyright 2010 Globe Newspaper Company.







Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 43 other followers