Afghanistan to top India-Iran talks

Afghanistan to top India-Iran talks

Sachin Parashar , TNN

NEW DELHI: While PM Manmohan Singh’s much anticipated visit to Iran may still take some time coming, government sources disclosed that foreign minister S M Krishna will visit Tehran later this month to shore up ties and ensure that Iran remains an ally despite the spate of setbacks in relations in the recent past.

Krishna’s visit to Iran, his first as foreign minister, will come shortly after foreign secretary Nirupama Rao visited Tehran in February.

While officials are still in the process of chalking out the agenda for the visit, sources said that Afghanistan will be one of the key issues to be discussed between the two sides.

“Iran is a an important ally when it comes to dealing with Afghanistan and its help is crucial to ensure that elements hostile to India don’t have a free run in Afghanistan, allowing Pakistan the strategic depth which it so dearly seeks over India after the NATO forces leave the region,” said a senior government official.

Despite Krishna spelling out conditions which could facilitate Indian engagement with Taliban, the fact is that New Delhi remains deeply apprehensive about the Taliban-al Qaida combine having a say in the Afghan administration once the US-led forces pull out.

Iran continues to maintain, as evident in its ambassador Syed Mehdi Nabizadeh’s statement last month, that there is no good or bad Taliban and that Taliban’s return would further worsen the security situation. Unlike India, however, Iran opposes deployment of more troops in Afghanistan and boycotted the London Conference saying that it was aimed at increasing military presence in the country instead of focusing on regional cooperation to solve the conflict.

The official said that Iran, Russia and even China were important for India to keep out Taliban from playing any major role in Afghanistan once “reconciliation and reintegration” start to take effect.

When Rao was in Iran, sources said, she also emphasised on terrorism emanating from Pakistan as an issue deeply affecting India, and Iran, which too has been at its receiving end, concurred that this had to be checked.

Krishna will also convey to the Iran leadership that India favours peaceful resolution of the issue related to Iran’s nuclear enrichment programme. It remains one of the most contentious issues between the two governments but India maintains that Tehran’s NPT membership obligations make it mandatory for it not to go ahead with its nuclear weapon programme. Iranian foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki had made Iran’s displeasure known to Krishna last year after India again voted in favour of an IAEA resolution against Tehran’s nuclear programme.

The visit is also not likely to facilitate any headway on the IPI pipeline issue as India continues to be wary of security and gas pricing. “The door is still open but India can’t make any commitment at this stage,” said the official.

Hekmatyar’s Forces Battling Taliban Pledge to Join Karzai Government

Afghan militants battling Taliban defect to gov’t

By Rahim Faiez, Associated Press Writer
KABUL – Dozens of Islamist militants defected to Afghan government forces Sunday after armed clashes erupted between them and their one-time Taliban allies in a northeastern province, two police officials said.

Fighters for the Hezb-e-Islami militia, loyal to regional warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, pledged to join the government while under pressure during the fierce fighting with Taliban militants in Baghlan province, the officials said.

At least 50 militants and an unknown number of civilians have died in the battles that have raged for two days and continued Sunday night, as militants apparently fought over control of several villages where the government has almost no presence.

The factions were firing rocket-propelled grenades and heavy machine guns in the battles, provincial Gov. Mohammad Akbar Barakzai said.

Violent clashes between anti-government Islamist factions are rare, although various militias have their own agendas and power struggles are relatively common.

Provincial police Chief Kabir Andarabi said more than 100 Hezb-e-Islami fighters have pledged to join the government forces that have massed on the edge of the battle zone. The regional police commander, Gen. Ghulam Mushtaba Patang, put the number of defecting fighters at 50 but said the situation was in flux and more could defect soon.

It was not immediately clear whether the clashes were a localized militant dispute or represented signs of a rift between Islamist insurgent groups that fight the government of President Hamid Karzai and international forces in the country.

Provincial deputy police chief Zalmai Mangal said reports from the area indicate that at least 50 militant fighters were dead, 35 from Hezb-e-Islami and 15 from the Taliban. It was unclear how many total militants were involved, he said by telephone from a district near the fighting where government forces have rushed to observe and try to help any wounded civilians.

Police had not yet entered the area of the clashes as of midday Sunday, but were standing by with mobile hospitals to help any wounded, he said.

It was unclear what touched off the fighting, which erupted Saturday morning and continued late into the night, resuming Sunday, Mangal said. However, he said that Taliban fighters reportedly had moved into villages that traditionally were controlled by Hezb-e-Islami.

Barakzai said the fighting centered around five to six villages west of Baghlan-e-Jadid district in the central part of the province.

He also said that 50 militants were reported killed, but did not have a breakdown of the casualties.

“We don’t know yet about casualties among civilians or damage to civilian houses,” he said.

Erdogan slams Israel list of Jewish sites

Erdogan slams Israel list of Jewish sites

Posted: 07-03-2010 , 13:39 GMT
erdoganTurkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem and the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron and the Mosque of Bilal Ibn Rabah, “will forever be Islamic and will never be part of the Jewish heritage.” In an interview to a Saudi paper published on Sunday, he said: “Palestine is our case did it is not out of our agenda in any given day.”

Erdogan, who described Palestine as an open prison, urged Palestinians to unite and end their internal division “because it is not in favor of the Palestinians, but in the the interest of their enemies. He added:” I love my brothers in Fatah And my brothers in Hamas wherever they are.”

The Turkish Prime Minister also stressed the necessity of lifting the siege on Gaza, saying “the Gaza Strip crossings did not allow the process of reconstruction after the devastating war and here I urge the Islamic world to take a serious steps In this area. “

Last week, the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that the Ibrahimi Mosque in Hebron and the Tomb of Rachel in Bethlehem n the list of Jewish historical sites. The Israeli move sparked riots in the West Bank and east Jerusalem. The Ibrahimi Mosque is considered the fourth most important Islamic mosque after the Holy Mosques in Makkah and Medina and Al Aqsa mosque.

© 2010 Al Bawaba (www.albawaba.com)

Round Table Discussion on Drone Attack on Quetta Shura Disrupted

Pakistan Embassy in DC attempts to mislead Round Table discussion on Drone Attack on Quetta Shura

Washington DC: March 7, 2010. (Ahmer Mustikhan) A Pakistani air force officer who by his very looks is a Punjabi and most possibly an operative of the infamous Inter Services Intelligence lied at a gathering of intellectuals and writers in Washington DC that Pakistan army has never used U.S.-supplied F-16 jets and Cobra helicopters in the restive Balochistan province, scene of a bloody insurgency that the Baloch call the fifth war of liberation.

Group Captain Ahmer Shehzad, an air attache at the Pakistan embassy in Washington DC took offense to an event organized by a premier U.S. think-tank in association with the American Friends of Balochistan to highlight the dangers of Talibanization in Balochistan.

Shehzad complained that the Middle East Institute had organized a talk on “Drone attacks on the Quetta shura? pros and cons” that opened up a discussion on the atrocities of the Pakistan military in Balochistan.

The speakers included Selig S. Harrison, Andrew Eiva, Ashraf Kakar, and Baloch notables Maqbool Aliani and Zain Magsi, while professor Marvin Weinbaum moderated the Friday noon event.

The serving air force officer defended the role of the infamous Inter-Services Intelligence and denied that Pakistan military has ever used F-16 jets or gunship helicopters against Baloch freedom fighters, who are demanding a timetable for Pakistan troop pullout from Balochistan.

Baloch patriots aleege that paid agents of the ISI attacked an event organized by students at the Balochistan University of Engineering and Technology in Khuzdar on March 2 that left two students, Junaid Baloch and Sikander Bangulzai dead. Two others Bebargh Zehri and Malik zain Zehri were critical among the 35 wounded.

The PPI news agency said a spokesman for the Baloch Armed Defence Army has claimed responsibility of bomb explosions. Speaking on phone with correspondents at the Khuzdar Press Club form an unknown location, Mir Jang Baloch warned BSO Azad and the Baloch resistance parties in the Baloch National Front, that it will continue to target them.

The spokesman also warned correspondents not to publicize news of the resistance or his army would target them as well.

The spokesman said that they would offer more resistance and target BSO, Baloch National Front and BRP in every nook and corner of Balochistan

Observers in Khuzdar said the pro-Pakistan terror group is headed by former cartaker echief minister of Balochistan, Mir Naseer mengal, whose ISI links are wellknown all over Balochistan.

Group Captain Shehzad also misled the seminar that he is a Baloch — he later told some participants he did have some Baloch in him.

“You can see from his face he is a Punjabi,” said Rashid Baloch, presiding council member of the American Friends of Balochistan.

Group captain Shehzad conceded that Pakistan military has used rocket-propelled grenades against the Baloch and also admitted Pakistan treated the Baloch people unfairly.

Use of F-16s and Cobra helicopters on Baloch freedom-fighters have been widely reported in world newspapers, including the Washington Post.

In a report on February 17, 2006 the late U.S.-based journalist Khalid Hasan wrote in the daily Times newspaper:

Army heavily deployed’ to fight Baloch insurgency

WASHINGTON: According to US intelligence sources, six Pakistani army brigades, plus paramilitary forces totalling some 25,000 men, are battling Baloch Liberation Army guerrillas in the Kohlu mountains and surrounding areas.

This and other figures are quoted in an analysis by Selig S Harrison, published on Wednesday by the Washington Post. The writer also quotes the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan as having reported “indiscriminate bombing and strafing” by 20 US-supplied Cobra helicopter gunships and four squadrons of fighter planes, including US-supplied F-16 fighter jets, resulting in 215 civilian dead and hundreds more wounded, many of them women and children.

Mehran Baluch, who represents Balochistan at the United Nations Human Rights Council, said Pakistan military officers are well-known for their lies. “They even deny there is a military operation in Balochistan,” Mehran Baluch said.

The uniformed Pakistani officer further alleged that Baloch national hero Brahumdagh Bugti travels from Kabul to Kandahar in an M17 helicopter of the Indian air force.

It was not sure if Group Captain Shehzad acted on his own or was deputed by Pakistan Ambassador Hussain Haqqani. Generally, Pakistan military officers do not answer to civilian authorities and Haqqani is widely despised by the I.S.I. as he had formulated the idea of bringing the rogue agency under civilian control at the time of the first official visit o Premier Yusuf Raza Gilani to the United States in 2008.

U.S. scholar Stephen P. Cohen, who has a soft corner for Pakistan soldiers, felt uncomfortable about the characterization of the Pakistan military as “Taliban in uniform” and questioned the role of the Baloch chieftain in their drive for independence.

At this, Maqbool Aliani drew a parallel between the American systematic annihilation of the Native Americans on the grounds that they were uncivilized and giving a license to Pakistani occupation force for a genocide of the Baloch tribesmen.

Zain Magsi, a self-made technological entrepeneur, said the Pakistan military as it exists today was created by the British as an anti-people force to check the freedom aspirations of the people. One of Magsi’s ancestors Nawab Yusuf Ali Magsi is regarded as the founder of the Baloch nationalism. He was killed in a devastating earthquake that struck Quetta in 1935.

The premier pro-independence American Friends of Balochistan in a statement released on the occassion said:

Let me first go to Khuzdar, a Baloch town about 300 miles southeast of Quetta. It is March 2, 2010 soon after dusk and one the largest students body, the Baloch Students Organization, is holding a Baloch cultural day at the campus of the Balochistan University of Engineering and Techonolgy, Khuzdar.

All of a sudden, paid agents of the Pakistani state, most probably the ISI, descend on the gathering and hurl three grenades on the cultural show.

BSO Azad member Junaid Baloch dies on the spot; another member Sikandar Bangulzai is wounded and shifted to a hospital in Karachi where he succumbs to his injuries. Both were in their early twenties. As many as 35 students and some faculty members are injured. Two are in critical condition. Their names are Beebargh Zehri and Malik Zain Zehri, a member of the central committee of the BSO Azad informed me on the phone yesterday afteroon.

This mourning apart, most Baloch are gungho over the prospects of U.S. drone attacks on the Taliban homes and hideouts in Quetta. They think it will be a day of reckoning for the Pakistani ISI and military. As much as some U.S. liberals dread these drone attacks, Baloch seculars say these are compulsory if the unfinished agenda of the war on terror is to be brought to its logical conclusion.

The relationship between Quetta and the AfPak war theatre is not new. Ribbon-shaped Quetta, the capital of restive Balochistan — scene of a bloody insurgency that Baloch nationalists call a liberation war –, was once a part of greater Kandahar. It finally came under British occupation in 1876. Due to its geo-strategic importance, the British built Quetta as a garrison town. They extended the roads and railway network to Afghanistan and Iran.

Quetta is also the only bone of contention between the Baloch and Pashtuns, the two dominant groups that have a population of roughly half million each in the Balochistan capital. There are also about 0.3 million Hazaras, who are shias, and nearly 100,000 recent migrants like Punjabis, Urdu-speaking people and even some Bengalis.

More recently, Quetta has earned itself the dubious distinction of being one of the world’s largest Afghan refugee cities. The refugees outnumber the local Pashtuns and Baloch taken together. Quetta was home to the present Afghan president Hamid Karzai for nearly two decades from 1983 to 2001. Ahmed Rashid in his book Descent Into Chaossays just two weeks before 911 Karzai was told by the infamous Inter Services Intelligence that he and his family will have to leave Quetta. He writes the orders came from none else but Taliban leader Mullah Omar. In 1999, Karzai’s father and 12 other prominent Afghans were murdered by the Taliban in Pakistan, with the collusion of the ISI.

Quetta may now also imminently become known worldwide thanks to the U.S. infotainment channels and the datelines of global newspapers if Vice President Joe Biden’s pet idea of drone attacks are launched there to take out Taliban insurgents creating a nightmare for the International Security Assistance Force in neighboring Afghanistan.

The Taliban are also bent upon imposing their own brand of Islam on one of the most modern cities closest to Kandahar. But don’t get me wrong, western trousers are not the norm and even when male wear pants they get strange, side looks from other males in baggy trousers.

Chaddor is compulsory for most women.

Talking with me on the phone from Quetta, senior journalist Shahzada Zulfikar said officially the population in Quetta is still cited at 0.7 million, but the local municipal sources say they can add as much as 2 million to this figure., thanks to the at least 1.2 million Afghan refugees in Quetta.

The areas where the Afghan refugees live are Pashtunabad, Khrotababad, Kuchlak, Ghousabad and Panjpai, which houses the infamous Mullahkhel Afghan refugee camp, that U.S. intelligence says is one of the nerve centers of the Taliban movement.

The Taliban are all over the place, says journalist Zulfikar. He said Baloch nationalists and militants are today the biggest supporters of the drone attacks on the Taliban leadership in Quetta. Their main concern is not the growth of the Pashtun population, but because they are fearing Talibanization of the Balochistan capital.

The Taliban have made no secret that they want shariah laws in Quetta, and if they succeed in this goal Balochistan will be on fire.

The Baloch are anguished over the posibility of the Taliban takeover of their capital and openly stated they support the drone attacks. Nawab Brahumdagh Bugti, president of the Baloch Republican Party clearly stated that drone attack is not a Baloch issue, as they battle the Pakistani army control of Balochistan. One of Balochistan’s main resistance leaders Mir Hyrbyair Marri, who now lives in London, said if the U.S. and NATO target the religious extremists, who are mostly Pashtuns, the Baloch would have no issue. “Even if there are a handful of Baloch in the Taliban ranks, they need to be eliminated,” Marri told me recently from London.

“The use of U.S. weapons would not be anything new in Balochistan,” Hyfrbyair Marri said. “U.S.-supplied weapons have been used by the Pakistan army against the Baloch for many decades now. It would be the first time forces allied with Pakistan army will be at the receiving end.”

He said this was the main reason why there is no much frenzy and furore over the drone attacks in the Pakistani media.

Marri has expressed his deep anguish over a report in the Wall Street Journal that said the Pentagon will transfer laser-guided-bomb kits to Pakistan. The WSJ report by Yochi J. Dreazen, published on March 2, said that Pakistan will soon receive equipment capable of converting 1,000 traditional munitions into “smart bombs.” Marri fears the reconfigured bombs will help Pakistan battle the Baloch in Balochistan, not the Taliban. Many Baloch say the Taliban are a “B team” of the Pakistan military. They call the Pakistan military the Taliban in uniform. Despite these allegations Pakistan will also soon take possession of a dozen American-made surveillance drones and 18 late model F-16 jets fighter jets to help Pakistan military track and strike targets deep inside Balochistan, Marri cited from Dreazen’s report.

Mehran Baluch, a younger brother of Marri, who has represented the Baloch voice at the U.N. Human Rights Council for a decade now, in a phone talk said Pakistan has used heavy duty ground missiles, traditionally used when two standing armies are at war, against the Baloch civilians in Marri and Bugti areas. He accused the Pakistan military of using incendiary bombs and phophorous bombs, probably belonging to the family of mustard gas, in the killing of former governor and chief minister ofbalochistan, Nawab Akbar Bugti. He said U.S. supplied F-16s with mountain capabilty have been used to target the Baloch.

According to US law (the Leahy amendment), no US military aid maybe provided to any unit of a foreign security force if there is credible evidence that such a unit has committed gross violations of human rights. Yet, military aid from the USA to security services and armed forces with a persistent record of human rights violations continues. Significant violations of human rights and international humanitarian law in some of these countries are carried out or facilitated by paramilitary and armed forces equipped courtesy of US military assistance.

A wide array of U.S. weaponry for the Pakistan military includes Cobra gunship helicopters, that are being used against the Baloch on their native land, Balochistan.

Mehran Baluch said there have been widespread unconfirmed reports of use of anti-personnel mines in Balochistan.

In this backdrop, it is not only the resistance, but even pro-federation politicians like Senator Dr. Malik Baloch support the drone attack idea. When Secretary of State, Madam Hilary Clinton, visited Pakistan last fall, the lone voice of support for the drone attacks came from this Baloch senator, who is also the president of the Balochistan-based National Party.

According to Balochistan National Party (BNP) Information Secretary and former senator Sanaullah Baloch supporters of Taliban have captured land worth Rs 2 billion in the eastern and western parts of Quetta with the covert support of the Pakistani agencies to undermine the Baloch nationalist movement and promote Talibanization of Balochistan.

Baloch in a recent communication said several locations in the provincial capital have become ‘no-go areas’ where the Taliban and their supporters have consolidated their position. Baloch said the government was fully aware of the illegal land grabbing but was looking the other way as it wants to use the Taliban against the Baloch nationalists.

Baloch said the Afghan refugees, besides being a burden on the economy of Balochistan, have become the biggest cause of lawlessness and terrorism in the country’s arewise largest province, Baloch said.

To see what the Baloch diaspora is thinking about the drone attacks, I sent out a questioner on the Baloch yahoo groups about the pros and cons and also posed the question on a Facebook page of the American Friends of Balochistan, which has nearly more than 900 mostly Baloch members from all over the world. By the way the American Friends of Balochistan is a target of attacks by the Pakistani counterpart of Bill O’reilly, named Zaid Hamid.

To my query, an official in the education department on a condition of not being named said, “I am in favour of the drone attacks on Taliban in Balochistan; I am waiting for the good news of the drone attackes. But Pakistan is against the drone attacks because they have sheltered the Taliban leaders in the city and even in sensitive places like the military cantonment. The attacks will expose the Pakistani dual policies on Afghanistan and on the war on terror”

Said a second Baloch, “I think there should be drone attacks on Taliban hideouts. I think we all know Pasthun areas are under the mullas and we Baloch are very secular. We don’t want the Taliban to take over Quetta like other cities of Pakistan.

Said a third, “We as Baloch residents of Quetta do not have any problems with the drone attacks as long as they are based on American intelligence and not on Pakistani information. If the Pakistanis are involved in this process, they would most certainly ask the Americans to bomb the Baloch civilian population rather than the Al Qaeda or Taliban strongholds.”

Says a fourth: “Yes the drone attacks will help because Quetta will become even more like a war zone, like Bangladesh in the 1971 war, and more Baloch will join the freedom struggle.”

Says a fifth: “I think these drone attacks will not help Baloch cause, but if they are done on Punjab they will help us.”

Says a sixth: Drone attacks are good for the Baloch living in Quetta as it may force the Taliban, who have already obtained Pakistani documents, to go back to Afghanistan and prevent turning the Baloch into a marginalised minority. But it may affect the populairty of the Baloch resistance for siding with the U.S. designs in the region.”

Fears run high Pakistan will use the drone attacks to target Baloch seculars.

Said one opponent: “Well, whenever the U.S. wants to attack surrounding areas of Quetta no one can stop them because Pakistan always gives in to U.S. demands. I think Pakistan will get the best out of a bad deal by misleading the U.S. and divert its anger toward the Baloch resistance movement.”

Says a second opponent: “As a human rights activist I am totally against drone attack or any type of attack to any part of Balochistan.

Saeed Ameeri, a senior Baloch activist, now based in the Gulf, who had set up a Baloch government in exile in the early 1960s in Iraq along with another veteran Jumma Khan — Selig knows them, I believe –, says it will be naive to think that Pakistan will allow drone attacks on the Taliban. Ameeri fears any drone attack in Balochistan will result in killing of innocent Baloch and Pashtun women and children. “Taliban are safe in sanctuaries in Balochistan under the protection of Pakistan,” Ameeri said. “There is a danger that Pakistan will mislead Americans with wrong intelligence to attack Baloch sarmachars or freedom fighters instead of the Taliban.”

Ameeri said he is with veteran Baloch leader and founder of the Baloch liberation ideology Nawab Khair Bakhsh Marri, 80, who said the drone attacks will turn the bleeding wounds of Balochistan into a cancer. Ameeri adds we must condemn any such attack on Baloch and Pashtun civilians in Balochistan. But people close to the veteran Baloch leader said he believes the drone attacks will not augur well for the baloch masses if the Pakistani military becomes a partner in the enterprise.

But Baloch intellectual Hafeez Hassanabadi, who has been close to Nawab Marri since his days in Afghanistan in the 1980s, says the veteran leader is against these attacks if Pakistani military and intelligence are involved but is open to the idea of U.S. and NATO attacks if Pakistanis do not have a say. This scenario is unlikely, however.

“Before an attack on shura, the Pakistani ISI will inform their ‘friends’ to move away from the targetted place,” Ameeri said.

The governor of Balochistan, Nawab Zulfiqar Magsi some months ago said Pakistan cannot oppose U.S. drone strikes in Balochistan as Washington can do “whatever it pleases” because it is “paying money” to Islamabad. Magsi says Pakistan does not have an option in this matter. “You cannot oppose someone who pays you money. The U.S. is paying money to Pakistan. How can we oppose it? It will do whatever it pleases.”

The American Friends of Balochistan is deeply anguished that premier U.S. policy making and implemeneting bodies, such as the Congress, State Department and Pentagon, have failed to take the most important stake-holders in so-called AfPak region — the Baloch –, while devising policies such as drone attacks. The Baloch feel proud of their secular politics and the myopic U.S. policy of putting all its eggs in the basket of the Pakistan military and intelligence services will gravely endanger the lives of the young men and women of the United States who are now serving in Afghanistan.

Through the MEI, established 1942, I urge Admiral Mike Mullen and Madam Secretary Hilary Clinton to personally meet the main resistance leaders Mir Hyrbyair Marri, Nawab Brahumdagh Bugti, Dr. Allah Nazar Baloch and other respectable Baloch national leaders such as the Khan of Kalat, Mir Suleman Daud and Baloch Nelson Mandela former chief minister Sardar Akhtar Mengal to see what the U.S. options are in the region before the U.S. embark on a policy of raining drones on Quetta.

Without further delay, I urge establishment of the Balochi language service of the Voice of America. This will cost less than what it costs the U.S to maintain two soldiers in Afghanistan each year and will go a long way in winning the battle of hearts in a region of great strategic value.

Without taking these baby steps, playing cheap, down and dirty and launching drone attacks might as well backfire.

I understand even secular and nationalist Pashtuns also want hellfire missiles from the drones to rain on the Taliban which have destroyed the national fabric of Pashtun society; these nationalists have been turned into sitting ducks by the Taliban, thanks to the ISI.

Pakistan Moves Toward Martial Law In Balochistan

[SEE: Taliban’s attack on Baloch cultural concert in Khuzdar blacked out by Pakistani media]

Balochistan govt imposes Section 144

QUETTA-The Balochistan government has imposed Section 144 in the province on Saturday with immediate effect in order to maintain law and order situation in the province. According to the notification issued by Home and Tribal Affairs Department, following imposition of Section 144 gathering of four or more people at public places, pillion-riding and display of weapons have been banned across the province.

144. Joining unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapon:
Whoever, being armed with any deadly weapon, or with anything which, used as a weapon of offence, is likely to cause death, is a member of an unlawful assembly/shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.

India to Reevaluate Policy of Treating Taliban As “Untouchables”

[If India was really a bastion of human freedom, democracy or diversity, it would reevaluate the idea of "untouchability" altogether.]

India rethinking Afghan policy

* NSC meeting mulls engaging Taliban, interacting with Pak Army, intelligence
* India says it won’t scale down Afghan operations in wake of Kabul attack

By Iftikhar Gilani

NEW DELHI: India is planning to open channels of communication with the Afghan Taliban to remain relevant, in the wake of the Western pullout and the fast deteriorating situation in Afghanistan.

Media reports suggest that a host of options were discussed at a meeting of the National Security Council (NSC), chaired by Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, on February 12, which included engaging the Taliban and opening channels of communication directly with the Pakistan Army and its intelligence to ensure safety of its citizens and interests in Kabul. Experts called it a “cold” and “hard” reality.

Intelligence experts have also asked the Indian government to explore alternative political pastures as Afghan President Hamid Karzai was too week to stand the Western pullout. The NSC meeting also decided to step up diplomatic efforts to involve Iran, Russia and Central Asian Republics to prevent handing over of Afghanistan to Pakistan on a platter.

They described Pakistani Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir’s tough talking during the recently-concluded talks in New Delhi as an indicator of these “realities”, which has boosted Pakistan’s confidence.

Recently, India’s former deputy national security adviser Satish Chandra had also questioned New Delhi’s treatment of the Taliban as “untouchables”. He revealed that during former premier Rajiv Gandhi’s tenure, contacts had been established with militants, including warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. “Once in power, the Taliban’s national interests will inevitably over time lead them to view us more favourably unless we treat them as untouchables. This has been true of most regimes in Afghanistan and may well be true of the Taliban if we play our cards right and do not gratuitously rub them the wrong way,” he added.

Operations: Separately, Indian External Affairs Ministry spokesman Vishnu Prakash on Saturday said India would not scale down its operations in Afghanistan in the wake of the February 26 attack in Kabul.

Deported British Diplomat Behind Effort to “Flip Taliban”

[Michael Semple, accredited with the former "Taliban split" operation which ended with his expulsion from Afghanistan (along with EU diplomat Mervyn Patterson), has come-up with a new version of his Taliban "reconciliation" theme, "Flipping the Taliban."  The article below is a summary of his book Reconciliation In Afghanistan.]
Reconciliation in Afghanistan

Flipping the Taliban: How to Win in Afghanistan

by Fotini Christia and Michael Semple

In Afghanistan, It's President Obama's War Now
By Jennifer Kohnke

After seven years of the Bush administration’s neglect and mismanagement of Afghanistan, President Barack Obama was prompt in ordering the deployment of 21,000 more U.S. troops.

Yet although sending more troops is necessary to tip the balance of power against the insurgents, the move will have a lasting impact only if it is accompanied by a political “surge,” a committed effort to persuade large groups of Taliban fighters to put down their arms and give up the fight.

The idea that large groups of armed men bent on killing Americans and other Westerners can be persuaded to change sides may seem fanciful at first. But it is not — at least not in Afghanistan.

After continuing uninterrupted for more than 30 years, war in Afghanistan has developed its own peculiar rules, style, and logic. One of these rules is to side with the winner. Afghan commanders are not cogs in a military machine but the guardians of specific interests — the interests of the fighters pledged to them and of the tribal, religious, or political groups from which these men are recruited. In a war that drags on, changing camps to the winning side means living and holding on to power, as well as saving one’s family and one’s village. Changing sides, realigning, flipping–whatever one wants to call it — is the Afghan way of war.

So far, Afghan leaders and their U.S. backers have made only halfhearted, ill-funded, and largely futile efforts to exploit the willingness of Taliban commanders to switch sides. Reconciliation with the Taliban has never been a sufficiently high priority for the Karzai government or Washington for either to put in place a coherent strategy encouraging defections from among the movement. But a focused campaign to win the cooperation of significant elements within the Taliban can succeed.

One important step is for the Afghan government to tailor its approach to the needs of the fighters. A well-organized reconciliation program would have to offer substitutes for all the benefits that membership in an insurgent network brings: comradeship, security, a livelihood, and respectability. Another important element of a reconciliation strategy will be to recognize the needs of each group, zeroing in on their particular characteristics: their tribal links, their traditions, the special conditions under which they function.

Any initiative to approach these groups should be spearheaded by interlocutors who have both credibility inside the Afghan establishment in Kabul and ties to insurgent networks. The trick will be to engage a critical mass of local commanders simultaneously. This vision of reconciliation concerns itself not so much with getting foot soldiers to lay down their arms as with building alliances with commanders and their troops.

The core rationale for the current NATO mission in Afghanistan is to ensure that the Afghan authorities can prevent the Taliban’s al Qaeda allies from exploiting Afghanistan as a base for terrorist operations. If they want to extricate themselves from the insurgency and become part of Afghanistan’s new deal, Taliban commanders will have to demonstrate that they have broken with al Qaeda. As a tradeoff and to create an incentive for the insurgents to cooperate, the U.S. government and its allies should gradually hand over responsibility for the country’s security to the Afghan national forces. Commanders and fighters should be formally associated with or absorbed into the police or the army, for example, which would allow the foreign troops to slip into the background.

And like it or not, the leaders, commanders, recruiters, financiers, and families of those running the Afghan insurgency are predominantly based in Pakistan. Thus, a process of reconciliation based on accommodation with key networks of commanders within the insurgency — rather than with the whole of the Taliban leadership or the movement’s foot soldiers — would have to start in Pakistan, where these networks are most accessible. Now that U.S.-Afghan-Pakistani relations are being recalibrated, Washington is on the lookout for ideas about how Pakistan could do more to support progress in Afghanistan. Pakistan’s backing of a low-profile political dialogue, even one that yielded only an agreement not to disrupt the process, would open up a whole new field of possibilities.

The Obama administration and its Afghan counterparts will have to get many things right in order to salvage Afghanistan.

Reconciliation with Afghan insurgents is one important component of any new successful strategy. President Karzai has pledged his personal support for reconciliation, but given his diminished personal standing and the mounting uncertainty about the future of his leadership, significant progress is unlikely unless he changes his policies or a new president is elected with the authority to cut credible deals. And given that corruption, arbitrary detentions, and factionalized local governance have helped drive so many people to join the armed resistance, progress is only likely where such predatory behavior can be reined in.

Finally, only if the United States’ military surge can demonstrably stem the insurgents’ influence in Pashtun areas will militants there start to believe that they might be able to stay alive if they realign with the government. But time is short, and effective engagement with the Taliban could mean the difference between a protracted, unwinnable conflict and a pragmatic solution acceptable to both Washington and its Afghan allies.

Fotini Christia is Assistant Professor of Political Science at MIT. Michael Semple is a regional specialist focusing on Afghanistan and Pakistan, with extensive experience dialoguing with the Taliban.

Copyright 2009 Council on Foreign Relations, publisher of Foreign Affairs. All rights reserved. Distributed by Tribune Media Services.

Petition Against Forcing Monsanto Frankenfood Down Indian Throats

[SEE: The Gene Gun At Your Head]

image

If science and technology minister Prithviraj Chavan has his way, he will force genetically modified (GM) food down our throats and imprison us if we try to resist it.

Click here to sign this petition: “Minister Chavan has betrayed the public trust by doing the dirty work of biotech giants. The Prime Minister should throw out Chavan’s corrupt GM bill.”

In the words of one Supreme Court lawyer, the bill is “a gag order, absolutely draconian and violative…of the Indian constitution which guarantees the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression.” [1]

Mr. Chavan’s position on Bt Brinjal was copied word for word from the biotech companies’ talking points. Now he’s drafted this bill to favour his friends in the biotech industry.

Can you sign this petition asking the Prime Minister to dump Chavan’s corrupt bill?

http://greenpeace.in/safefood/chavan-petition/

The petition says: “Minister Chavan has betrayed the public trust by doing the dirty work of biotech giants. The Prime Minister should throw out Chavan’s corrupt GM bill.

This petition will be delivered to Dr. Manmohan Singh, who is currently supporting Mr. Chavan’s bill.

The BRAI bill is full of clauses which hand over control of our food choices. Take a look at what’s in this terrible bill:

  • The bill would create a small body of technocrats who take the final decision on the genetic tampering of brinjal, rice, and more. There is no place for public opinion, State governments, other ministries, or any elected representatives like panchayats. [2]
  • The science and technology ministry is already responsible for promoting GM crops. It would be a conflict of interests for the same ministry to regulate GM crops.
  • The bill has provisions to imprison and fine people who raise concerns on GM crops. [3]
  • The National Campaign for People’s Right to Information states that the bill subverts the Right to Information (RTI) act by letting the authority decide what information can be disclosed to the public, instead of the Central Information Commission of the RTI act. The bill thus overrides the powers of the commission which is an impartial body to decide public interest.
  • The biotech corporations are guaranteed a seat in the advisory councils of the very body that’s supposed to regulate them.

This authority should be protecting our biosafety and the rights of citizens and elected representatives to say no to GM crops, but it would represent the interests of international biotech giants instead.

Sign the petition now to save your right to safe food:

http://greenpeace.in/safefood/chavan-petition/

Thanks a billion!

Jai Krishna
Jai Krishna
Sustainable Agriculture Campaigner
Greenpeace India


Sources:

1. “Govt moots jail for GM food critics,” India Today, February 19, 2010
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/site/Story/84730/India/Govt+moots+jail+for+GM+food+critics.html

2. Sec 5 of the bill defines the BRAI as a body made up of 3 scientists.
Sec. 34 specifies the roles of the State Biotechnology Regulatory Advisory Committee as restricted to an advisory role.
Sec. 15 specifies that the ministries have only an advisory role.
Sec. 81 specifies that the act will have an overriding effect on all existing laws.

3. Sec 63 of the bill specifies “whoever, without any evidence or scientific record misleads the public about the safety of the organisms and products specified in Part I or Part II or Part III of the Schedule I, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to one year and with fine which may extend to Rs 2 lakh or with both.”

The Daily Show, Sarah Palin, Microsoft

The Daily Show, Sarah Palin, Microsoft and back to Mordechai Vanunu

eileen fleming

Because I watch The Daily Show, I learned Sarah Palin was on a Jay Leno show. She got a few laughs, but nobody was talking about Palin’s connections to the top leaders of “the New Apostolic Reformation/NAR; a religious movement that makes geographic maps of where demons reside. The NAR is a religious network of elites drawn from the ranks of business and government throughout the world [and] encompasses the humble and the elite alike, supporting a network of ‘prayer warriors’ in all 50 states, within the ranks of the U.S. military, and at the far reaches of the globe — all guided by an entire genre of books, texts, videos and other media. The New Apostolic Reformation, is the largest religious movement you’ve never heard of.”[1]

What we the people for peace, justice, equal human rights and for an end to war and military occupations are really up against is the empire of Big Brother; or the dominant or Royal Consciousness asWalter Brueggemann explains it in, The Prophetic Imagination.

Brueggemann describes the ancient Hebrew prophets as itinerant poets, who addressed the social and political injustices perpetuated by the power structures, and were routinely ignored or reviled for telling the brutal truth.  Brueggemann also connects the dots between prophecy and politics,  “We will not understand the meaning of prophetic imagination unless we see the connection between the religion of static triumphalism and the politics of oppression and exploitation.” [2]

“Royal consciousness is what drives the structures of political power—institutions that, devoted only to their perpetuation, exploit and oppress the people they are charged with protecting and serving.

“Royal Consciousness is concerned only with maintaining the systems that will increase power and wealth for the few.” [Ibid]

Perpetuating the status quo is the foremost goal in the maintenance of Royal Consciousness, which runs through state, church and corporate media.

Hierarchy always interprets any expression of doubt or inquiry as a threat.

Those that question a policy or decision are perceived as undermining authority, but dissent and investigative journalism are the means to assure a healthy democracy.

In 1958, Edward R. Murrow warned that as television became more about entertainment and not about shows of enlightenment, the republic would be dumbed down.

The royal consciousness thrives when people are in a state of comfortable numbness; a society dominated by the royal consciousness becomes easily anesthetized by politicians who can also do a little stand up comedy.

Totalitarian regimes control the people with fear of ‘the other’ and lives kept busy with keeping roof above head and any escape from routine is often filled with mindless entertainment.

But then, the curtain on the obvious comes down and what is oblivious to most is that things are very wrong indeed. People are needlessly suffering because of the apathy and especially the inaction by those with political power- but without the political will to do the right thing-and they won’t do the right thing, unless their consciences can be accessed and pricked.

But the situation appears hopeless, the world is out of balance, tipped on its side by military power and royal conciseness thrives when ever there are those who believe there is nothing that be done to fix anything, so why even bother to think about it?

Royal Consciousness thrives whenever ‘we’ do not consider ‘the other’ as also us-just in different skins and places in time.

And that is the task of prophetic imagination: to simply and directly challenge the royal consciousness by being a voice of Conscience, and it begins with “spying on Americans has become big business” and the unearthing by

Cryptome provided the lead to a 22-page Microsoft document, outlining how Microsoft stores all of your private data in their online servers and helps government agencies obtain your private information without the need for court orders.

Read that Microsoft Document here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/27394899/Microsoft-Spy
However, on February 13, 2008, we already knew:

“The Senate yesterday approved a sweeping measure that would expand the government’s clandestine surveillance powers, delivering a key victory to the White House by approving the telecom immunity provision…the Senate approved the reauthorization of a law that would give the government greater powers to eavesdrop in terrorism and intelligence cases without obtaining warrants from a secret court…The most important change approved by the Senate yesterday would make permanent a law approved last August that expanded the government’s authority to intercept — without a court order — the phone calls and e-mails of people in the United States communicating with others overseas.” [3]

1. http://www.truthout.org/prayer-warriors-and-palin-organizing-spiritual-warfare-take-over-america57276

2. Braverman, Mark, FATAL EMBRACE, page 154

3. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021300959.html?hpid=topnews


Only in Solidarity do “we have it in our power to begin the world again.”-Tom Paine

Eileen Fleming,
Founder of WeAreWideAwake.org
A Feature Correspondent for Arabisto.com
Author of “Keep Hope Alive” and “Memoirs of a Nice Irish American ‘Girl’s’ Life in Occupied Territory”
Producer “30 Minutes with Vanunu” and “13 Minutes with Vanunu”
http://www.youtube.com/user/eileenfleming

Reconciliation in Afghanistan

Reconciliation in Afghanistan

After eight years of continuous war in Afghanistan, the international community, the US and its international allies are talking about a possible surge and reconciliation for Afghanistan. A number of articles and analysis as well as arguments have been published in different magazines and newspapers in the US. I found one of them very realistic and logical. Thus I wanted to discuss the reconciliation in Afghanistan with a relative argument.

The article titled “Flipping the Taliban” from Foreign Affairs Magazine[i] demonstrates how US reconciliation can win the war in Afghanistan and how US reconciliation with Taliban insurgents is possible. The authors Christia and Semple believe that it is feasible because for warlords’ opposing sides in Afghanistan and for many insurgent commanders war is not a matter of ideology. The authors, for example, address security issues from a realist perspective, which is the perspective used in this critique. But the article is not acceptable from a social constructivist perspective. The authors also discuss the opinion poll on Afghan reconciliation conducted in February 2009, and the results were that 64% of voters felt reconciliation was possible.[ii] The reconciliation model in Afghanistan could be similar to the Washington strategy of military-political counter-insurgency in Iraq that details insurgents who are willing to reconcile and those who are not. The authors suggest that the Saudi Government acts as a mediator to facilitate the reconciliation process with the Taliban. The article ends with a discussion on a “tea-drinking diplomacy” and the issue of insurgent safe-havens in Pakistan.

Although the reconciliation idea is noteworthy, the authors do not adequately consider the Afghan context. In every country people’s behavior is based on a set of main thoughts which reflects their behaviors. No nation in the world wants to reconcile with alien insurgents. How could the national and international community and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in Afghanistan reconcile with the Taliban when many insurgents are not Afghan? There are many non-afghan Talibs who have emerged alongside the Afghan Taliban and they have affiliated and gathered to fight NATO forces in Afghanistan, not necessarily due to any specific goal for Afghanistan.[iii] Since not all insurgents are Afghan, the reconciliation idea does not seem feasible in Afghanistan nor a realistic security solution.

Furthermore, the opinion poll on Afghanistan reconciliation[iv] is not acceptable. The survey is not clear on who was surveyed or on how applicable the data is for the total Afghan population. The poll is inadequate because it does not assess factors such as the historical background for making important decisions, the current insecurity, the role of religious clergies and tribal leaders, and the difficulty Afghans may have in reconciling with non-Afghans. A better alternative to the survey could be the Loya Jirga (the Great Assembly). The Loya Jirga is a widely accepted Afghan entity which has more credibility to Afghans than an opinion poll. The Loya Jirga is not only traditionally accepted in Afghanistan but also according to the Afghanistan constitution, the “Loya Jirga is the highest manifestation of the people of Afghanistan.”[v] In the Loya Jirga, all representatives of the people such as tribal leaders, clergies and elders of Afghan society participate and their decision on an issue is the most acceptable decision for Afghans.

The authors further suggest that the Saudi Government has an influential role in bringing about this reconciliation.[vi] However, this influence by its nature negatively affects Afghan independence. The Taliban ideological ties with Arabic Osama bin-e-Laden and Saudi Arabia’s influence on the Taliban contradict Afghan freedom of thought and threaten Afghanistan’s newly established state. Consequently, the authors suggest securing safe havens for insurgents in Pakistan during reconciliation.[vii] However, the safe haven suggestion may not be welcomed by the Pakistani government since Asif Ali Zardari, the Pakistani leader, is not willing to stand for long-term agreements regarding the Taliban.[viii] On the other hand, according to Roy Stewart, a Harvard University professor, Al Qaeda is in Pakistan, not in Afghanistan.[ix] Thus it is not logical to create safe havens in Pakistan for those who have safe havens already.

The governing power of the state cannot be shared with heterogeneous factions and if this happens the state will be demolished. Afghan history and reconciliation experiments demonstrate that this strategy may not succeed. Dr. Najibullah, the President of Afghanistan from 1989-1992,[x] also declared reconciliation with multiple factions of the Mujahidin, but it failed because they were diverse groups, which is the same as today’s Taliban. Nick B. Mills in his book titled Karzai mentions that: “…vicious clashes among the Mujahedeen factions rendered the government unable to function.”[xi] It is also written in the book, “How We Missed the Story,” about Mujahedeen that “their rivalries weakened their military efficiency.”[xii]

The authors interestingly mention that the US must make friends especially among its enemies using the rules of war in Afghanistan.[xiii] For example the US can use the concept of “side with the winner” as one of the rules of war in Afghanistan. The Uzbek general, the Tajik commander, the Hazara leader and the Pashtun headman are examples that the authors mentioned. I can strongly say that the strategy of changing sides only happens in internal wars between groups of Afghans in Afghanistan. According to Robert Rotberg the author of Building a New Afghanistan, “when there is a common interest, such as repelling invaders there has usually been some degree of cooperation among the different groups.” Rotberg also gives the examples of the British in the nineteenth century and the Russians in the 1980s. Both these armies experienced failure in Afghanistan.[xiv] Thus, if insurgent warlords consider the international community as invaders, reconciliation will not bring an end to this war.

We cannot look at Iraq as a reconciliation model for Afghanistan. Afghanistan is not Iraq and is not similar to Iraq. Afghanistan has its own unique war context. Iraq was not dealing with as many economic problems as Afghanistan, or a history of 30 years of continuous civil war. In other words, there was already an established state in Iraq, while Afghanistan has had, and continues to have an unstable state.

The authors go on to say that “reconciliation in Afghanistan requires distinguishing the “good” Taliban from the “bad”.”[xv] However, this is not a practical argument. A few months ago the leader of the Taliban, Mullah Mohammad Omar, responded to this argument in many Afghan newspapers and the official Taliban website and stated that there is no good and bad between the Taliban. He emphasized being united in this war. [xvi]

Reconciliation could be an effective strategy in Afghanistan if the historical backgrounds, behaviors, ways of thinking and the Afghan context are considered. For instance, the Loya Jirga could be used as a way to understand the people’s ideas rather than an opinion poll. Afghans do not consider all Taliban to be Afghans and so mediation with Saudi Arabia and Pakistan could interfere with Afghan independence and Afghan freedom. The war can only be turned around if it is an internal war, not when there are outsider ‘invaders’ in the country. Last but not least, Afghanistan cannot implement a successful model of reconciliation based on Washington’s strategy in Iraq due to the significant differences between these two countries.


[i] Fotini ChristiaMichael SempleFlipping the Taliban, Foreign Affairs, New York: Jul/Aug 2009. Vol. 88, Iss. 4; 34, 13. http://proquest.umi.com.proxy.miis.edu/pqdlink?index=4&did=1768605561&SrchMode=3&sid=1&Fmt=3&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1251315970&clientId=944&aid=1

[ii] Fotini ChristiaMichael SempleFlipping the Taliban.

[iii] Laura Hayes, Borgna Brunner, and Beth Rowen, Who Are the Taliban? Their history and their resurgence

http://www.infoplease.com/spot/taliban.html

[iv] Fotini ChristiaMichael SempleFlipping the Taliban.

[v] Atricle one hundred and ten, Afghanistan constitution.

[vi] Fotini ChristiaMichael SempleFlipping the Taliban.

[vii] Fotini ChristiaMichael SempleFlipping the Taliban.

[viii] Ani, Swat peace deal ‘dead’ : Holbrooke, May 6th, 2009. http://blog.taragana.com/n/swat-peace-deal-dead-holbrooke-53920/

[ix] Rory Stewart, The Places in Between. http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/09252009/watch.html

[x] Laura Hayes, Borgna Brunner, Timeline: The Taliban;Key dates in the history of the Taliban and Contemporary Afghanistan. http://www.infoplease.com/spot/taliban-time.html

[xi] Nick B.Mills, Karzai; The Failing American Intervention and the Struggle for Afghanistan, 2007, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 7.

[xii] Roy Gutman, How we Missed the StoryOsama bin Laden, the Taliban, and the Hijacking of Afghanistan, United Nations Institute of Peace, Washington DC, 2008. 223.

[xiii] Fotini ChristiaMichael SempleFlipping the Taliban.

[xiv] Cindy Fazey, Responding to the opium Dilemma in, Building a New Afghanistan, Robert Rotberg Ed. World peace foundation, Cambridge Massachusetts, 181.

[xv] Fotini ChristiaMichael SempleFlipping the Taliban.

[xvi] Messages, Declarations, Declaration of the Islamic Emirates leader about the Obama’s speech to the Islamic world, http://www.shahamat1.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=181:2009-06-05-08-39-37&catid=10:2009-03-12-06-27-50&Itemid=5

Hekmatyar’s Forces Attack Taliban In North Afghanistan

[This is the former turf of Mullah Abdul Ghani BaradarThis should be seen as the first fruits of his removal and the opening of a new front against the Taliban, to take the heat off the south.]

Taliban clashes with rival Afghan militants kill 60

Map

At least 60 militants have been killed in fighting between the Taliban and a rival Islamic group, Hezb-e-Islami, in northern Afghanistan, police say.

The fighting in Baghlan province erupted on Saturday morning. A number of civilians died in the crossfire.

It appears to be a rivalry over control of local villages and the taxes they generate, a BBC correspondent says.

Hezb-e-Islami, loyal to former PM Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, is the second biggest militant group in Afghanistan.

It is unclear what sparked off the confrontation between the two groups, which have been allied in their opposition to Afghan’s central government and foreign forces.

Baghlan’s police chief told the BBC that 40 Hezb-e-Islami fighters had been killed, as well as 20 Taliban militants.

The Taliban are said to have arrested at least 50 members of Hezb-e-Islami, Gen Akhbar said.

Fighting is taking place in an area where the Afghan government has little or no presence on the ground, says the BBC’s Chris Morris in Kabul.

The Sociopathic Style

What is psychopathy?

http://www.aftermath-surviving-psychopathy.org/

Psychopathy is a personality disorder signified by a pattern of lying, exploitiveness, heedlessness, arrogance, sexual promiscuity, low self-control, and lack of empathy and remorse. Those who are affected may appear normal thus increasing their ability to effectively prey on others.

People severely affected with psychopathy have a false believe in their own superiority, a sense of entitlement and a complete disregard for social norms. They therefore leave a long trail of victims and survivors over the course of living their lives. Their victims include strangers, friends, lovers, co-workers and family members.

Unable to love, feel remorse or show any trace of guilt, they survive by charming, conning and manipulating others. Because they are impulsive and do things that hurt other people, psychopathic individuals are also called “antisocial” by mental health professionals.
[LEARN MORE]

What causes psychopathy?

Genes play a significant role in the cause of psychopathy. However socialization and other environmental factors interact with genetics, so genes are probably not the only determinant.
[LEARN MORE]

Psychopathy is very costly to society. The disorder is responsible for much human suffering. The disordered person, his/her family and nearly everyone he/she contacts is affected.

People with the disorder commit a disproportionate number of violent and non-violent crimes. People with the disorder burden our justice system, and, by harming others, burden our health and social service systems.

People with the disorder are often addicted to alcohol and other drugs, adding burden to our health care system.

How many people are affected by psychopathy?
We do not yet know how many people have psychopathy. Some estimate the figure at approximately 1% of North Americans.

Because each psychopathic person hurts many others, the number of people affected by the disorder is far greater than the prevalence of psychopathy.

The Sociopathic Style

is an ongoing educational and research project created by its Founder, Marion Trent and Partner, Dr. Kathie Mathis. Together, they have identified a relationship style that undoubtedly has touched millions of people on earth. It is a relationship style first discovered in Ms. Trent’s work with victims of sociopaths.
When we look at the news, it becomes clear that there is a significant increase in the reports of sociopathic behavior in our society.

The news items that hit our media daily focus mainly on the perpetrator. Marion Trent began her focus on the victims of sociopaths who did not make the media, but who number in the thousands or even millions. A central theme for all victims was a significant drop in vital life energy with attendant fear and depression, a serious shift to low self-esteem and self-doubt, a loss of sense of direction in life and a serious questioning of spiritual values.

In her work beginning with support groups for victims of sociopathic relationships, Trent discovered a relationship style operative in the victim as well as the sociopath. In some cases, the victims got into a relationship with a diagnosable sociopath and were true victims.

However, there emerged another pattern that seemed broader and more complex. Many of the victims had been in similar relationships before and repeatedly sought out other sociopaths with whom to be in a relationship. In addition, they were blind to what seemed to be an obvious relationship pattern. It became clear that some victims played a role in the relationship dynamics. Even more interesting, relationships that began as somewhat normal developed into true sociopathic relationships. It was evident that the perpetrators became sociopathic only in the relationship process.

It is widely recognized that there are people who can be diagnosed as sociopaths (or psychopaths) according to the guidelines of mental health diagnostic protocols.

However, The Sociopathic Style™ addresses a relationship style that is not necessarily diagnosable by consulting only an individual. Trent and Mathis believe this dysfunctional relationship style, or relationship disease, is the spiritual source of all addictions and child – spousal – sexual abuse, as well as the abuse of power in business and personal relationships.

Marion Trent and Dr. Kathie Mathis also recognize it is essential to view the problem from a perspective that is different from the traditional psychiatric perspective. Rather than a static diagnosis of a person, they look at the a dynamic evaluation of a relationship system that uses a perceptual base in the tradition of ego psychology, a family systems approach and a life energy approach as it applies to the body. It includes an understanding of spiritual dynamics in human systems. It is with this approach that they have been able to develop critical survival tools. These tools permit early recognition of the dynamics and the prevention of (further) victimization — as well as insights and procedures vital to the recovery process.

Young Turks/Armenians–Zionist Pay-Back

The Israel lobby must have felt that the pleasure of pay-back on Turkey outweighed former fears of seeing Turkey’s “crypto-Jewish” community blamed for slaying Armenian Christians.

[SEE:  Jewish Lobby behind U.S. ‘Genocide’ Vote’]

Ten Commandments of the Committee of Union and Progress

Alleged steps for ethnic cleansing/genocide

Dönmeh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dönmeh refers to a group of crypto-Jews in the Ottoman Empire and present-day Turkey who openly affiliated with Islam and secretly practiced a form of Judaism called Sabbateanism. The group originated during and soon after the era of Sabbatai Zevi, a 17th-century Jewish kabbalist who claimed to be the Messiah and was eventually forced by the Ottoman Sultan Mehmed IV to become a Muslim. After Zevi’s conversion, a number of Jews followed him into Islam and became the Dönmeh. Since the 20th century, many Dönmeh have intermarried with other groups and most have assimilated into Turkish society. Although some still consider themselves Jews, the Dönmeh are not officially recognized as such by Jewish authorities.

Confessions of a Holy Sinner

by
Reb Yakov Leib HaKohain, Founder & Spiritual Director
DONMEH WEST

“Then Cain said to Yahweh: ‘My punishment is greater than I can bear. See! Today you drive me from this ground. I must hide from you, and be a fugitive and a wanderer over all the earth. Whoever comes across me will kill me.’ Yahweh replied: ‘Very well then, If anyone kills Cain, sevenfold vengeance shall be taken for him [by me].’ So Yahweh put a mark on Cain, to prevent whoever might come across him from striking him down. And Cain left the presence of Yahweh and settled in the land of Nod, east of Eden.” (Genesis 4:13-16)

The “Holy Sinner” — he who sins, who lives beyond conventional morality, yet carries in himself the grace of God for others to receive — is he on whom there rests the “Mark of Cain” — the Holy Spirit — bestowed on him by God for reasons only He alone can know. This “Mark of Cain,” this indwelling of the Holy Spirit, is neither punishment nor rebuke, as commonly (and mistakenly) believed, but a protection of the Holy Sinner placed there by God “to prevent whoever might come across him from striking him down.” Even Paul declared it:

“If I should decide to boast, I should not be made to look foolish, because I should only be speaking the truth; but I am not going to in case anyone should begin to think I am better than he can actually see and hear me to be.“In view of the extraordinary nature of these revelations [I have], to stop me from getting too proud I was given a thorn in the flesh, an angel of Satan to stop me from getting too proud! About this thing, I have pleaded with the Lord three times for it to leave me, but he has said, ‘My grace is enough for you: my power is at its best in weakness.’ So I shall be very happy to make my weakness my special boast so that the power of Messiah may stay over me, and that is why I am quite content with my weakness, and with insults, hardships, persecutions, and the agonies I go through for Messiah’s sake. For it is when I am weak that I am strong.” (2 Corinthians 12:6-10)

So even Paul bore in himself the Mark of Cain — the “thorn in the flesh” — that both tormented and exalted him. And why? Because the sinner is, or can be, far closer and more precious to God than the Saint. Consider the words of the Talmud and Tomer Devorah:

“The Righteous cannot stand in the place of a penitent sinner.” (Tomer Devorah, Sepher-Hermon edition, 1974, p. 58)

Without sin, there is no repentance, and without repentance there is no closeness to God. Indeed, repentance brings us into the Glory of God, but sin is that which makes repentance possible. Therefore without sin, we cannot know God, and without the Knowledge of God we are dead. In the words of the Prophet Isaiah:

“And yet ours were the sufferings he bore, ours the sorrows he carried. But we, we thought of him as someone punished, struck by God, and brought low. Yet he was pierced through for our faults, crushed for our sins. On him lies a punishment that brings us peace, and through his wounds we are healed.” (Isaiah 53:4-5)

Thus, the Holy Sinner sins on behalf of others, is punished for his sins on behalf of others, is crushed for his sins on behalf of others — and by his sinning, they are healed. But the Mark of Cain protects him from their condemnation, from their ignorance by which they see him only as “someone struck by God, and brought low” for his having done in public what they covet in secret. His public humiliation, therefore, is a substitute for theirs; it is no longer necessary for them to sin in order to repent — he has done it for them.

THE BLACK SEA COVERED IN A FEARSOME DARK

“Jacob Frank (1726-91) will always be remembered as one of the most frightening phenomena in the whole of Jewish history: a religious leader who, whether for purely self-interested motives or otherwise, was in all his actions a truly corrupt and degenerate individual.” — Prof. Gershom Scholem (The Messianic Idea in Judaism, Schocken Books, 1971, p. 126)

Nevertheless, this Jacob Frank — whom Scholem here rightly describes as “one of the most frightening phenomena in….Jewish history” and a serious religious leader who was, at the same time, “truly corrupt and degenerate”

Pentagon and Univ. Alabama Shooter Both Specialized In Same Field–Bionic Connections

[Can it be written up to mere coincidence that both the Pentagon Subway shooter and the Alabama professor shooter were both working in the same field of electro-biological science, specifically, the integration of electronic circuitry with biological connections?  John Bedell was working on biological/electrical connections at the molecular level, specifically, making biological connections to electro-plated aluminum components.   Amy Bishop was working on mammalian neuron connections, to integrate with Neuristor™ circuitry (An electronic component that processes electrical signals in a manner modeling the behavior of neurons).

It is significant that Bedell's statement, in addition to focusing on military drug-trafficking out of California (SEE: Col. James Sabow ), alludes to working on "information currency...that will affect complex human actions."  This sounds very much like the theories offered in the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars paper.

Did both of these mentally ill researchers expose themselves to the government's cyber-soldier, mind-control technology and become victims of the great evil which runs this Nazi-created program?  Maybe this is a sick method for disposing of unstable researchers who know too much?]

John Patrick Bedell

I have a bachelor’s degree in physics from the University of California, Santa Cruz, and studied biochemistry at San Jose State University. I’ve studied electrical engineering with the goal of creating microsystems for molecular analysis. You can see a proposal to use aluminum anodization as an adsorption method for DNA molecules on CMOS chips at v:DNA_integrated_circuit/proposal_import_2007 (which originates from an unsuccessful DARPA proposal to create a “microMIRV” interoperable with standard firearms ammunition), and a proposal to use xenon difluoride to create a picoliter-scale computer-controlled device for sorting biomolecules (available atv:Capillary_electrode_array/proposal_import_2007), including DNA and protein molecules. My goals include the discovery of a protein sequence for the diamondase enzyme, enabling the creation of macroscale diamond structures, and the creation of self-assembled macrosystems with CMOS DNA-integrated circuits.

image

The scale of these and other projects have led me to develop financial instruments representing information as a tool to manage large projects that are very knowledge-intensive.

I am determined to see that justice is served in the death of Colonel James Sabow, as a step toward establishing the truth of events such as the September 11 demolitions and institutions such as the coup regime of 1963 that maintains itself in power through the global drug trade, financial corruption, and murder, among other crimes. My work to develop information currency is an effort to create a framework for information management that uses financial markets to create the economic signals (prices) that will effect complex human actions in the real world based on specified information.

Dr. Amy Bishop
Assistant Professor
Department of Biological Sciences

  • Molecular Biology of Oxidative Stress
  • Neurobiology
  • Neuroengineering
  • Induced Adaptive Resistance
  • Neuroengineering
    My laboratory’s goal will be to continue in our effort to develop a neural computer, the Neuristor™, using living neurons. This computer will exploit all of the advantages of neurons. Specifically, neurons rich with the nitric oxide (NO) dependent learning receptor, N Methyl D Aspartate receptor (NMDAR), will be utilized. These have previously been studied in the context of induced adaptive resistance to NO (IAR). For the Neuristor™ we will take advantage of the IAR phenomena since it has been demonstrated that IAR neurons express more learning and memory receptors (NMDAR) as well as increased neurite outgrowth. The neurons that we are currently using are mammalian motor neurons. We are exploring the possibility of using neurons derived from adult stem cells, and from bony fishes provided by Bruce Stallsmith Ph.D. This laboratory has created a portable cell culture incubator, the Cell Drive™ that is an ideal support structure for the Neuristor(An electronic component that processes electrical signals in a manner modeling the behavior of neurons).