Los Cayos andGuajira Basins

25 07 2010

image





A Colombian Village Caught American Cross-Fire–1998

25 07 2010
Published on Sunday, March 17, 2002 in the Los Angeles Times
A Colombian Village Caught in a Cross-Fire
The Bombing of Santo Domingo Shows How Messy U.S. Involvement in the Latin American Drug War Can Be.
by T. Christian Miller
SANTO DOMINGO, Colombia — Death came to Santo Domingo as its people celebrated life.Villagers were gathering for a street fair that bright December morning, but a battle had broken out between the Colombian army and leftist rebels in the nearby jungle.

The villagers heard a military helicopter roar overhead. Seconds later, an explosion ripped through this collection of wood huts on the edge of Colombia’s northeastern plain. Two children were cut down as their grandmother made them breakfast. A father was eviscerated as his sons watched. A nursing mother was nearly decapitated, her 3-month-old baby still in her arms.

In all, 11 adults and seven children died in Santo Domingo on Dec. 13, 1998.

The Impunity
Demonstrators march through the town of Tame, Colombia in December on the third anniversary of the bombing of Santo Domingo. About 1,500 people from Tame, Santo Domingo and other nearby communities took part in the march. The sign reads, “the impunity.” (ZOE SELSKY / LAT) 12/13/01

On the surface, the attack seems to be another bit of homemade carnage in Colombia’s long, bloody guerrilla war, notable, perhaps, only for the number of children who died.

But according to Colombian military court records, the U.S. government helped initiate military operations around Santo Domingo that day, and two private American companies helped plan and support them.

There is no evidence that the U.S. government or American companies knew that their aid might lead to the destruction of a village. But more than three years later, no one has been held accountable for the deaths. Civilian prosecutors accuse a Colombian air force helicopter crew of dropping a U.S.-made cluster bomb while supporting the troops engaged in battle. The military claims that guerrillas accidentally detonated a car bomb in the town.

The investigation is bogged down in jurisdictional disputes. U.S. pledges to help have languished.

An examination of the incident by the Los Angeles Times reveals an alarming picture of the Colombian conflict just as the U.S. prepares to become more deeply involved.

According to a videotape admitted as evidence in a closed military tribunal, Colombian court documents and interviews with more than three dozen military officers, witnesses and experts:

* The events leading to the battle outside Santo Domingo and the explosion began when a U.S. government surveillance plane detected an aircraft allegedly carrying weapons for the guerrillas. In doing so, the plane may have violated rules that restrict American activities in Colombia to counter-narcotic operations.

* Los Angeles-based Occidental Petroleum, which runs an oil complex 30 miles north of Santo Domingo, provided crucial assistance to the operation. It supplied, directly or through contractors, troop transportation, planning facilities and fuel to Colombian military aircraft, including the helicopter crew accused of dropping the bomb.

* AirScan Inc., a private U.S. company owned by former Air Force commandos, helped plan and provided surveillance for the attack around Santo Domingo using a high-tech monitoring plane. The U.S. Coast Guard is investigating whether the plane was flown by a U.S. military pilot on active duty. Company employees even suggested targets to the Colombian helicopter crew that dropped the bomb.

* In a violation of U.S. guidelines, the U.S. military later provided training to the pilot accused of dropping the bomb, even after a Colombian prosecutor had charged him with aggravated homicide and causing personal injury in the Santo Domingo operation.

AirScan officials deny involvement in the incident, saying their plane was used only to survey Occidental’s oil pipeline, and the company is not accused of any illegal activity. Occidental officials say they routinely supply nonlethal equipment for military operations in northeastern Colombia but they could neither confirm nor deny their role on the day of the explosion.

Regardless, the incident touches on many of the issues that make Colombia’s war so problematic for the United States.

Until now, U.S. involvement was supposed to be black and white: The U.S. government provided military training and aid to wipe out the vast fields of coca plants and poppy flowers that produce the majority of illegal drugs on America’s streets.

But leftist rebels have increasingly financed their war with drug profits, meaning that operations against guerrillas and against narcotics often blend seamlessly. And since the breakdown of Colombia’s peace process in February, rebels have unleashed a campaign against the country’s infrastructure, including the pipeline that moves Occidental’s oil, bringing private industry ever closer to the war.

The Colombian military brigade that oversaw the operations around Santo Domingo is in line to receive enhanced training and equipment as part of the Bush administration’s $98-million proposal to help protect oil facilities in the region.

Events in Santo Domingo also reveal a contradiction in U.S. attitudes. Even as Washington insists that Colombia vigorously pursue human rights abuses, it has shown little interest in investigating the possible role of American citizens.

Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) sponsored amendments to the last two U.S aid packages to Colombia that require suspension of aid to any military unit suspected of human rights violations, unless the government is actively pursuing a case against the accused.

“Three years have passed, and we have yet to see anyone prosecuted for the needless deaths of 18 people or the flagrant attempts by Colombian military officers to cover up the crime,” said Leahy, now the chairman of the Foreign Operations subcommittee of the Appropriations Committee.

This is perhaps what is most important to the people of Santo Domingo. While the war raged around them for years, the town’s 200 people mostly avoided the violence, until Dec. 13, 1998.

Now they are surrounded by it. Early this year, a resident who had been a key witness against the Colombian military in the case was assassinated by suspected right-wing paramilitary fighters.

“Nothing can fix what happened,” said Margarita Tilano, a 44-year-old grandmother whose daughter and two grandchildren died in the 1998 attack. “We want justice, nothing else.”

The United States

On Dec. 7, 1998, according to military court records obtained by The Times, Colombian army intelligence intercepted a scratchy radio conversation between two commanders of the country’s largest rebel army, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC.

Colombian army officers have said that they interpreted the coded conversation to mean that the FARC high command was sending a small plane loaded with weapons to land near Santo Domingo. In return for the weapons, the local rebel commander would hand over 2,200 pounds of cocaine that his men had recently seized from drug traffickers.

What made the rebel operation particularly important to the Colombian military was that German Briceno, a top local FARC commander, was suspected of overseeing it.

Briceno, better known as Grannobles, is the brother of the FARC’s military commander and a vicious, if not adept, leader. Two months after the Santo Domingo incident, he is believed to have ordered the kidnapping and killing of three Americans who were working to protect the rights of indigenous people.

The reported involvement of drugs allowed the Colombian military to call for help from U.S. Customs P-3 Orion surveillance planes that normally track clandestine drug flights.

On Dec. 12, at 2:45 p.m., according to court records, a P-3 packed with high-tech monitoring equipment detected a Cessna 206 heading toward Santo Domingo.

The Cessna landed north of the village. Men in civilian clothes swarmed the plane and began unloading boxes.

Within five minutes, the plane was airborne again. The Colombian military pounced. A company of soldiers from the 18th Brigade was sent to pursue Grannobles on the ground, while the air force intercepted the Cessna and forced it to land.

No drugs were found on the plane–not even after prosecutors performed tests able to detect microscopic traces of cocaine. An internal Colombian air force control tower log recorded the mission as an attempt to block an “arms delivery”–there was no mention of narcotics.

Even though it is unclear whether drugs were ever part of the rebels’ operation, current and former U.S. Embassy officials said the United States was right to aid the mission despite the restrictions limiting U.S. aid to counter-narcotics operations.

The Cessna was flying from a known drug zone, they said, and they believe that no drugs were loaded onto the Cessna because the pilot realized he was being watched.

The search for Grannobles on the ground fared even worse. Helicopters transporting the 70 soldiers of Dragon Company took heavy fire as they landed. Then, as the troops fought to cross a bridge about 700 yards north of Santo Domingo, one soldier was killed and four were wounded.

“We heard [the commander] on the radio. He was desperate. He said, ‘They’re killing us,’ ” Lt. Guillermo Olaya, the air force liaison with the army, said in military court testimony. “Hour after hour, the combat grew more intense.”

Oxy and AirScan

At 9 a.m. the next day, worried air force and army commanders gathered in a tiny room to plan an operation to rescue Dragon Company, according to military court testimony and interviews with pilots involved in the operation.

The location of the meeting was Occidental Petroleum’s Cano Limon oil complex about 30 miles north of Santo Domingo. Occidental has long been active in Colombia. In 1983, it discovered a billion-barrel oil field. To develop the site, Occidental and a Spanish oil company with a minority interest entered into a 50-50 partnership with Colombia’s state oil company, Ecopetrol.

But in discovering oil, Oxy walked into the middle of Colombia’s decades-old internal conflict with two guerrilla armies, the FARC and a smaller group called the National Liberation Army.

Both made Oxy, its workers and the oil pipeline a target. There have been more than 900 attacks against the pipeline since 1985.

To stop the attacks, Oxy decided to undertake the unusual mission of bolstering a foreign military force by strengthening the under-equipped and underfunded local army unit, the 18th Brigade, current and former Oxy officials said. In effect, Oxy became the unit’s quartermaster.

Oxy or its contractors provided troop transport helicopters, fuel, uniforms, cars and motorcycles. It even paid for leave tickets and better rations to improve morale, according to the Oxy officials and local military commanders.

The company also provided cash to the military, about $150,000 a year, according to one rough estimate by a top Oxy official. Both the in-kind and cash aid, a total of about $750,000 a year, was strictly limited to logistical support. Oxy insisted that its help not be used for arms.

But as a result, the army had more money available to combat the leftist guerrillas throughout Arauca state, where Santo Domingo is located, as well as improve security along the pipeline.

The 18th Brigade has been accused of abuses, including cooperation with violent paramilitary groups in the kidnapping and murder of suspected guerrilla sympathizers. The recent killing of Angel Riveros, who was a key witness for the prosecutors in the Santo Domingo attacks, is a case in point. Local human rights groups say the killers passed through a military roadblock maintained by the 18th Brigade before the Jan. 24 shooting. Brigade officials deny responsibility.

“We’ve had serious problems with the military in Arauca in terms of human rights and in the way the military deals with paramilitaries,” said Robin Kirk, a Colombia expert for Human Rights Watch.

Oxy has given classes to military officers on human rights and required its workers to sign contracts promising to respect international norms. But it hasn’t implemented other steps, such as insisting on an independent review of the human rights record of the military units they are supporting.

Oxy officials say they have little control over such matters. They say relying on the military is better than having their own armed security service.

“We have military protection because we must have it, because we have no alternative,” said Guimer Dominguez, the president of Oxy’s Colombia operations. “Unfortunately the armed forces are short in some areas, and in this sense, we give them nonlethal support.”

Part of this support, according to interviews and court testimony, was “Room G” at Oxy’s Cano Limon complex, where the military commanders gathered on the morning of Dec. 13, 1998.

Tucked in a corner of the complex, the room was surrounded by sandbags and equipped with TV monitors and computers. Room G, according to those present, served as the planning center for the operation in Santo Domingo, thanks, in part, to a second U.S. company, an obscure and low-profile firm called AirScan.

Based in Rockledge, Fla., AirScan came to Colombia in 1997 as a contractor for Oxy, according to Oxy officials. One of the Colombian army’s deficiencies was that it simply couldn’t find the highly mobile guerrillas. AirScan owned a fleet of small planes equipped with high-tech monitoring devices, such as infrared cameras, that could track guerrilla activity along the pipeline.

The company had a handful of contracts for aerial surveillance and monitoring, some of them with U.S. Air Force bases such as Vandenberg and Cape Canaveral.

The founders of AirScan, Walter Holloway and John W. Mansur, both have backgrounds as air commandos, the Air Force version of Special Forces. Mansur, 61, the company’s chief executive, retired from the Air Force in 1987 as a highly decorated colonel, having served as a military assistant to the secretary of the Air Force and as the commander of the Air Force’s Eastern Space and Missile Center at Patrick Air Force Base, near AirScan’s headquarters.

Mansur impressed Oxy officials.

The AirScan pilots “were not gung-ho jocks. They were very professional,” said a former Oxy official. “They were not mercenaries in the classic sense.”

The Switch-Over

The reconnaissance flights didn’t stop the guerrillas, who recognized that being spotted by AirScan didn’t mean the army was on its way. They actually began waving at the AirScan pilots.

Colombian military officials began pressuring Oxy to use AirScan to conduct intelligence patrols far away from the pipeline, according to former Oxy and State Department officials.

Toward the middle of 1997, about six months after Oxy’s contract with AirScan began, one top Oxy official approached the U.S. Embassy to ask what sort of limits should be put on providing intelligence to the Colombian military. The response was simple: Stick to the pipeline.

“I said, ‘Look, you’re getting into a dirty area, it’s very dangerous,’ ” one former State Department official recalled. ” ‘If you do flights like mercenaries, then you’ll be responsible.’ “

To avoid trouble, Oxy officials say, they ended their direct involvement with AirScan by transferring its contract. Instead of Occidental, AirScan ended up having a contract with the Colombian air force that was paid for by Ecopetrol, Oxy’s Colombian partner in the pipeline.

For its part, AirScan said it patrolled only the pipeline during the time of the bombing in Santo Domingo, 30 miles away.

“The focus of AirScan activity was simply pipeline surveillance,” Mansur wrote in a brief statement to The Times. “This was the only activity in which AirScan crews or aircraft were engaged.”

Pilots involved in operations around Santo Domingo disputed that account, testifying that AirScan played a far larger role that day.

A crime against humanity
Children in Santo Domingo have depicted the December 13, 1998 attack on their town in a poster. It includes photos of the seven children killed. Its caption reads “A crime against humanity committed by airplanes donated by the U.S., supposedly to fight drugs.” The head of the Colombian Air Force, Gen. Hector Fabio Velasco, threatened to sue the human rights groups that produced the poster, but never followed up on the threat.
(ZOE SELSKY / LAT)

In interviews, pilots also said that AirScan flew missions all over Arauca, which at 9,000 square miles is about the size of New Hampshire. It frequently provided intelligence on guerrilla patrols and helped pick out targets, they said, and even celebrated kills when an air force pilot successfully blew up a guerrilla squad.

“They would say, ‘Good job, you got him,’ ” said one of the Colombian military helicopter’s crew members who is accused in the Santo Domingo bombing. In an interview, he said he was on dozens of missions with American pilots working for AirScan, including one who identified himself as a Navy SEAL.

AirScan’s role became so vital that military forces insisted on a patrol before almost every battle, according to the crew member. Once, a low-flying AirScan pilot took ground fire and had to have his fuel tank replaced when he returned to base.

“If there were confrontations between the army and guerrillas, they were always there,” the crew member said, referring to AirScan. “They were our eyes.”

“They frequently strayed from their missions to help us in operations against the guerrillas,” said another of the accused crew members. “The plane would go and check and verify [guerrilla] patrols and say, ‘Hey, there are people here.’ “

That is exactly what two AirScan crew members did during the Santo Domingo operation, according to Colombian pilots involved in the exercise.

The Briefing

The briefing at Oxy’s Cano Limon oil complex on the morning of Dec. 13, 1998, was convened so that Colombian military officials from the 18th Brigade and the air force could figure out how to save Dragon Company, which had been pinned down since the night before.

Most of the information supplied at the briefing came from AirScan employees Joe Orta and Charlie Denny, who had been flying since 6:33 a.m. with Colombian air force Capt. Cesar Gomez, according to testimony and interviews with those present, as well as a flight log obtained by The Times from military court files.

Gomez was on the AirScan plane to guarantee a Colombian military presence on a mission flown by Americans. He was also the military’s designated liaison with Oxy, Gomez testified in court.

Although he was supposed to be in control, he testified that he only sat in the back of the plane and watched the developing operation on a small monitor.

The AirScan plane, which was flying with Colombian air force markings, “provided day and night aerial surveillance of [Santo Domingo] and adjacent villages in support of the counter-guerrilla forces,” Orta wrote in his summary of the Dec. 13 flight.

Orta and Denny used video of the area around Santo Domingo that they had made earlier in the morning to show nests of guerrilla soldiers to the Colombian military officers present, according to those who attended the briefing.

They pointed out guerrillas who they said could be seen in the town, mingling with civilians, according to one of the accused crew members present at the briefing.

The AirScan crew never indicated that guerrillas had taken up positions in the town, but they did suggest attacking a concentration of guerrillas in a stand of jungle a few hundred meters away, according to military court testimony and interviews with several pilots present.

After the briefing, Gen. Luis Barbosa, the local army commander, decided to request air support for a company of troops to land and reinforce Dragon Company.

“The [AirScan pilots] helped us throughout the operation, taking a quantity of videos where you could see the town, the movement of the guerrillas and the movements of the troops,” said Olaya, the airforce liaison with the army.

Orta’s identity is something of a puzzle. Colombian Foreign Ministry records show that a man named Barbaro Jose Orta was given a six-month temporary visa to work in Colombia for AirScan beginning in February 1998. There is no indication that his visa was renewed before December 1998.

U.S. military files also show that in 1998, a man named Barbaro Jose Orta was an active-duty member of the U.S. Coast Guard’s Search and Rescue team in Miami, assigned to coordinate rescue missions.

A photograph of Orta in those files was picked out of a stack of photographs by two Colombian military pilots involved in the operation as the man who called himself “Joe” Orta. And one of Barbaro Jose Orta’s family members, who spoke briefly with The Times, confirmed that Barbaro Orta usually goes by the name “Joe.”

The military records also show that Barbaro Orta was on authorized leave between Dec. 9 and Dec. 19, 1998. But there is no indication that he sought permission to work a second job or that he asked permission to go abroad, both of which were required at the time for active-duty officers.

Though Barbaro Orta left the service in November 2000, Coast Guard officials have opened an inquiry into whether Orta was the AirScan pilot, after being contacted by The Times. Barbaro Orta, still in U.S. military service as a member of the Puerto Rican Air National Guard, did not respond to numerous attempts to contact him through his military postings or through his family.

“If [Barbaro Orta] was on board the aircraft, it was without the knowledge or authorization of the U.S. Mission in Colombia,” said an embassy official in Colombia.

As for the other American AirScan crewman, neither the Foreign Ministry nor the Colombian customs agency has a record of anyone named Charlie Denny entering Colombia.

The Pilot

Once Colombian military commanders gave the go-ahead, Lt. Cesar Romero and his crew began preparing their Huey helicopter for combat.

Normally, Romero, co-pilot Johan Jimenez and technician Hector Hernandez flew transport routes, moving food and troops between battles.

But this time, their Huey was mounted with a World War II-era AN-M41 cluster bomb, given to the Colombian military by the United States in the 1980s, according to Colombian air force officials. Romero, who has no blemishes on his service record, had twice before dropped such devices.

The bomb, comprising six bomblets, is mounted on a metal rack. Each bomblet weighs 20 pounds and is packed with 2.7 pounds of explosives.

The rack attaches to the side of the helicopter. When the target is in sight, a wire is pulled and the bomb falls out. The individual bomblets separate, hit the ground, and bounce about an inch and a half high. Then they explode, sending chunks of metal at 2,800 feet per second in all directions from a steel coil wrapped around the charge.

The bomb, last used by the U.S. in Vietnam, has an effective diameter of about 30 yards, meaning anybody within 15 yards of it is likely to be killed.

About 9:30 a.m., Romero’s Huey and four other helicopters, including a Russian-made MI-17 that military officials say was provided by Oxy through a contractor–took off for Santo Domingo from Cano Limon. They carried relief troops, the cluster bomb, Brazilian-made Skyfire rockets and heavy machine guns.

According to pilots present at the scene and military court records, they were joined on site by the AirScan plane, which also took off from Oxy’s oil complex and was filming the entire operation. Colombian military pilots said in court testimony that throughout the day, the plane and helicopters returned to Cano Limon to refuel and review new mission plans in Room G.

There is a dispute over the targeting of the cluster bomb. Some say Romero was supposed to consult with ground troops before dropping it. But Romero said he talked only with the AirScan pilots and the pilot of an armed H500 Hughes helicopter also at the scene.

“The coordinates were made directly with the armed helicopters that were in the area and the Skymaster plane that was crewed by American pilots,” Romero told a military judge last year. “The troops were communicating directly with the armed helicopters and the Skymaster.”

A Colombian UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter was also airborne. It had been donated by the U.S. primarily for use in anti-drug missions. It began firing rockets into the jungle. The Huey pilots have testified that they heard the AirScan pilots warn the Black Hawk pilot, “Careful, you’re shooting at civilians!”

For his part, Romero said he focused on his target: a thick stand of jungle 1,000 to 1,200 meters north of Santo Domingo, 200 meters west of the road where the Cessna had landed the afternoon before.

The Huey circled the area twice to be sure of the target, then Romero started the countdown: “Three, two, one, now!” he shouted. Hernandez pulled a steel cable and the bomb fell away.

The Bomb

Neither Romero nor his co-pilot can recall seeing the bomb hit. The pilots have been consistent with this account for three years.

The only problem: There is no stand of jungle 1,000 to 1,200 meters north of Santo Domingo, and 200 meters west of the road where the Cessna landed. There is only open field.

Santo Domingo is a nothing place, some three dozen wooden shacks hard against a curve in a two-lane highway. There is no electricity. No phones. No running water. Just big sky, open savanna and thick jungle.

Most of the people raise cattle or grow corn. Others have small stores. The Colombian government has no permanent presence, so FARC guerrillas move openly through town. Unlike other parts of Colombia, drugs are not a big part of the economy, though coca is grown and cocaine is produced in the region. The road where the Cessna touched down is one of the primary clandestine landing strips.

Once a year, in December, when the crops are harvested and Christmas is coming, the town holds a two-day street fair to raise money for civic projects. In 1998, the aim was to put a concrete floor in the two-room schoolhouse and add doors.

On Dec. 12, family and friends from hamlets throughout the region began arriving to play in a soccer tournament, watch a beauty contest and eat barbecue.

But in the afternoon, they began to hear gunfire, then explosions, coming nearer. Aircraft flew overhead throughout the night, shooting into the jungle.

Some people decided to stay, fearful they would be caught in the cross-fire. Others left. Still others tried to leave but turned back because of their own fear, or because soldiers stopped them, warning that it was too dangerous.

The next morning, Dec. 13, the town’s community leader and bus driver, Wilson Garcia, then 44, decided to go to the nearest town that had a phone, about 15 miles away, to call the Red Cross for help. Before he left, he told townspeople to wave white rags to show the aircraft above that they were civilians.

“Just stay calm,” he said.

So people remained. There was Nancy Castillo, who’d given birth to a baby girl just three months before. Salomon Neite, 58, a farmer who was about to retire and hand over his land to his two sons. Luis Martinez, 25, a soccer fanatic with a wife and child. Edilma Pacheco, 27, was working at the local store as a clerk. Giovanny Hernandez, 16, had come from a nearby town for the fair.

When the aircraft appeared about 9:30 a.m., people followed Garcia’s advice. They began waving white rags above their heads. Some even lay down on the pavement, hoping to better demonstrate their neutrality.

About 10 a.m., Garcia’s daughter Alba, then 16, and many of her friends were in the street near a broken-down red truck, a 1955 Chevrolet parked across from the town’s drugstore.

They watched as a helicopter came into view, then turned to pass over Santo Domingo from south to north. As it drew overhead, Alba looked up and saw about four dark objects falling.

“Look,” she said to a friend. “They’re throwing rolls of paper at us.”

Then, darkness.

Santo Domingo had just been bombed.

A tape of the operation viewed by The Times–identified by those involved as a tape made by AirScan–does not capture this moment. The camera is focused on a field less than half a mile away where relief troops were landing. But the survivors have vivid, slow-motion memories of what happened.

The front of the red truck was smashed in by a direct hit, its right front fender falling to the ground. Smoke filled the air. A woman screamed, “They killed my children!” People began fleeing the town on foot.

Alba woke to find herself bathed in blood, her arm nearly severed.

Across the street, at the drugstore, Maria Panqueva was knocked flat by a piece of steel that hit her leg. The woman standing next to her, Nancy Castillo, was killed while nursing her 3-month-old, the top half of her head nearly sliced off. The baby was found lying next to her, screaming.

In a nearby house, Margarita Tilano was stunned by the noise. Then she heard screams. Her daughter, Katherine Cardenas, 7, and granddaughter, Edna Bello, 5, were dead. Her grandson, Jaime, 4, was wounded and would die on the way to the hospital.

Down the street from the blast, Amalio Neite, 22, was blown six feet from where he had been standing. He turned to see his brother holding his father, Salomon, writhing on the ground, a hand over his abdomen to keep in his intestines.

Eighteen people died and more than 25 were wounded, some of them crippled for life. Today, Alba cannot move her left arm above her head. Its scars resemble the crude stitching on a rag doll.

At the eastern edge of Santo Domingo, Olimpo Cardenas was about 150 yards away with his back to the explosion. When it occurred, he turned around to see dead and wounded everywhere.

Cardenas jumped on a motorcycle and rode out of town to the home of a friend who owned a Ford flatbed truck. The two men drove back slowly. At 10:20 a.m. they pulled up in front of the drugstore, where many of the dead and wounded had been taken.

They loaded up about seven of the victims.

As they left town, they saw another helicopter hovering above them. About 200 meters, or about 219 yards, away from town, they heard a burst of gunfire, and saw earth and concrete flinging up next to them. Then the helicopter flew off.

Cardenas, who had gotten out of the truck, stayed until he was sure everyone had left town. Then he walked out on foot.

“I was the last one out,” he said. “The place was a ghost town.”

The Investigation

The dead and wounded began arriving at hospitals in the afternoon. Most told a similar story: At 10 a.m., a military helicopter had dropped a bomb on Santo Domingo.

But separate investigations by the Colombian air force and army concluded that the carnage was not the military’s fault. They said that guerrillas had installed a car bomb inside the red truck, the epicenter of the damage. They said the plan was to lure Dragon Company into Santo Domingo, then detonate the bomb. But after troops arrived to reinforce Dragon Company and save the unit, the bomb went off by mistake, killing the villagers.

The military said that conclusion was based on both testimony and forensic proof–both of which were later called into question.

Fragments from the town tested positive for chemicals commonly found in homemade explosive materials, according to court records. Two FARC deserters who gave themselves up after the bombing blamed the incident on their former comrades. Another witness, a local man who reported seeing the FARC at work on the truck, recently recanted, saying a military officer from the 18th Brigade had paid him to lie.

Air force officials also said a cluster bomb would have destroyed structures or left large craters, a puzzling claim since AN-M41s have a relatively small charge designed to kill people, not destroy buildings.

“I think, and it’s only a suspicion . . . that the guerrillas put the bomb there,” Gen. Hector Fabio Velasco, the head of the Colombian air force, said in an interview last year.

Olaya, the air force’s local link to the army, refused to turn over documents to civilian federal prosecutors when they arrived Dec. 17, according to military court records.

Velasco continued to insist that no bombs had been used in the operation, even after air force officials had sent notice to headquarters about the use of the cluster bomb. Velasco later explained that the air force classifies cluster bombs as low-power explosives, not as bombs.

The military’s insistence that the combat and the air force bombing occurred far from town is also in question.

Using a satellite-guided measuring device accurate to within a few meters, The Times traveled to Santo Domingo several times to measure distances mentioned in the military’s accounts of the incident.

The military has said in interviews and military court testimony that the fighting began where the Cessna had landed, about 6 kilometers, or a little more than 3.5 miles, from Santo Domingo.

The actual distance between Santo Domingo and the landing site, based on the coordinates supplied by the military to the court, is 3 kilometers, according to a hand-held Global Positioning System that can measure distances between geographic coordinates.

The pilots indicated on a map that they dropped their bomb in a stand of jungle 1,000 to 1,200 meters from Santo Domingo, 200 meters west of the road. But that stand of jungle is at maximum 650 meters away.

As to the testimony of more than 30 survivors, military officials said they were probably lying–either out of fear or sympathy for the guerrillas.

Colombian military officials weren’t the only ones clouding the story.

Days after the bombing, Leahy fired off a letter from his Senate office demanding information. Then-Ambassador Curtis Kamman responded with a detailed note that only further confused matters.

Kamman made no mention of the involvement of the U.S. P-3 plane on the day before the incident, though he said Colombian air force planes had done surveillance of the Cessna that landed outside Santo Domingo, initiating the operation.

He also told Leahy that embassy officials had viewed a five-hour tape of the incident, which showed that Santo Domingo had remained “intact” at the time people in the town reported being bombed. The tape “directly refut[ed]” their claims, he said, and supported the military’s story of a guerrilla car bomb that had exploded at another time.

Kamman said in an interview that he did not know the origin of the tape and had “no information” on AirScan’s involvement in the incident.

But if the tape was the same one viewed by The Times–and there is no evidence that any other aircraft filmed the operation–it is unclear how embassy officials missed the wreckage of the red truck and the loading of bodies on the truck. Both are visible on the tape.

The Breakthrough

By June 1999, almost all the investigations were over or dormant. The general conclusion: The guerrillas and the people of Santo Domingo had attempted to pull a fast one, and they had failed.

Still, civilian investigators were not convinced. The first forensic examinations of Santo Domingo had been done in the days after the bombing, when combat was still going on. Two teams of experts had been shot at. No team spent more than 90 minutes in the town.

So the investigators–a federal prosecutor and the procuraduria, a sort of inspector general–requested a more thorough look. Teams went back to Santo Domingo in June 1999 and February 2000.

In June, they determined that the red truck had been hit from above by an explosive device. In February, they compared metal fragments that remained in the town’s wooden buildings to fragments of an exploded AN-M41. The two sets of metal were similar. They also discovered six craters in and near the town, corresponding with the six bomblets, according to military court files.

Then, in perhaps the biggest breakthrough, federal prosecutors dug back through the evidence to find metal fragments taken from the bodies of two bombing victims.

They sent these fragments, taken from a 42-year-old woman and a 16-year-old boy, to the FBI via the U.S. Embassy. They also sent some of the fragments they had found in their February hunt.

On May 1, 2000, the FBI produced its report. The fragments were “consistent” with a U.S.-made AN-M41. One piece had “NO E BOM” stamped on the side. The phrase “NOSE BOMB FUZE” is printed on AN-M41 cluster bombs.

The FBI analysis also found that there were no signs that the cluster bombs had been delivered through an “improvised” delivery system–i.e., it had not been modified to be used as a car bomb.

This was enough to convince prosecutors they had a case. They accused the crew of the Huey of aggravated homicide and aggravated personal injury, although they left open the question of whether the crew had bombed the village on purpose or accidentally.

Then, because the act was committed in a military setting, they turned the case over to the air force to reopen its investigation of the crew–Romero, Jimenez and Hernandez.

But the military made little progress in the investigation. Velasco, the air force general, told reporters in Colombia that more than $1 million had been spent by unknown parties to manipulate evidence to make his pilots appear responsible.

After nearly a year, fearing that the military was not conducting an impartial investigation of itself, the civilian prosecutors asked to regain control. The case has been tied up in jurisdictional wrangling ever since. The most recent decision places the investigation in the hands of the military.

“The military was hiding the truth,” said one former prosecutor who was involved with the case. “We knew the investigation wouldn’t happen if it stayed with the military.”

Defense lawyers for the men now say they believe that the bomb fragments were not taken from townspeople, but guerrillas. Under this theory, the guerrillas were killed after the cluster bomb dropped on them in the jungle. Their comrades then transported the bodies into Santo Domingo.

They point out that there are no photos of the bodies during the autopsies, that not much blood was found at the scene and that some of the bodies arrived nude, perhaps meaning they were stripped to hide their identity.

“There has been too much international pressure to condemn these men,” said Ernesto Villamizar, a top Bogota lawyer who represents one of the pilots. “This is going to be a very long process, and at the end, the truth will come out that the munitions dropped from this helicopter had nothing to do with the deaths in Santo Domingo.”

Military officials also question whether the fragments analyzed by the FBI actually came from the explosion in Santo Domingo, citing doubts over the chain of custody.

“The FBI said, yes, this is a fragment, but that doesn’t mean anything,” Velasco said. “There isn’t any proof that these fragments were really from there.”

Despite the charges against him, Romero has advanced in rank to captain. Jimenez believes that he was denied promotion because of the investigation. Nonetheless, both men are now regularly flying combat missions with the Colombian air force.

Romero continued to receive training in the U.S., despite strict regulations that prevent instruction when there is even the suspicion of human rights violations.

The U.S. Embassy said Romero received a refresher flight-simulation course at Randolph Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, in September 2000–three months after the prosecutor’s May ruling ordering an investigation against him for possibly killing 18 civilians, and only one month after the military reopened its investigation into the incident.

Embassy officials said they were unaware of the investigations at the time of Romero’s training. No formal system exists to exchange data between the embassy and the prosecutor’s office on suspected human rights violators, and embassy officials say there are no plans to implement one.

An Error?

For all the investigation that has been done, one central question remains: If the Colombian air force did drop a cluster bomb on Santo Domingo, was it deliberate or a mistake?

Those who believe the bombing was a war crime point out that visibility was perfect on Dec. 13, 1998, that the townspeople had clearly signaled they were civilians, and that at least two helicopter pilots testified they had seen them.

So even if the pilots believed there were guerrillas in town, they had to have known that innocent people would be killed if a bomb was dropped. Finally, it is difficult to make such a mistake with an AN-M41, a simple gravity bomb. To have hit Santo Domingo, the bomb had to have been launched very close to it.

“The military has never said it was an error. If it was a mistake, why aren’t they just admitting it?” said one lawyer monitoring the case who did not want to be identified because of its sensitivity.

But many of the same facts also argue for the possibility of error. Romero has always said he dropped the bomb 1,000 to 1,200 meters from the town. Two other pilots, however, said they believed the bomb was dropped between 500 and 600 meters from town.

If Romero’s helicopter was at the height and speed he said it was, the bomb would have traveled about 500 meters from where he launched it, according to an analysis done by the Federation of American Scientists, using testimony from the case. That means that if Romero was heading in the direction of the town, something he denies, the bombs easily could have landed in Santo Domingo.

If it was an error, some believe, the Colombian military is still culpable.

“There’s a pretty fine line between intent and tragic accident,” said David Stahl, a Chicago attorney who is on the advisory board of the Center for International Human Rights at Northwestern University. “I think what happened is the Colombian armed forces put themselves in a situation where a tragic accident was all but certain to happen.”

There are still crucial details that could clear up the mystery. For instance, the Huey pilots said they never flew over Santo Domingo. Romero said the helicopter was north of the village and flying west. The co-pilot said they dropped the bomb while heading northwest.

But the pattern of the impacts found by civilian investigators, and the recollections of survivors, contradicts that testimony.

Survivors say the helicopter that passed over the village just before the explosion was traveling from south to north. The analysis by the American scientists indicates the helicopter that dropped the bomb most likely passed over the town, and was probably headed either northeast or southwest.

“The key discrepancy is the direction. You can’t match [the pilots' testimony about their direction] with the direction of the bomb,” said Michael Levi, a physicist who did the analysis.

The Americans who worked for AirScan might be able to resolve the confusion. But two lawyers involved with the case said AirScan has told the military court that the men no longer work for the company and that it has no information on their whereabouts.

Oxy officials, meanwhile, said they have never investigated what role the company and its facilities might have played. Nonetheless, they rejected any ties to the disaster.

“We’re truly sorry about what happened–though we don’t know the details–but in no way can we feel that we have any responsibility,” Dominguez said.

Human rights advocates say the U.S. government is duty-bound to conduct its own investigation into the role played by Orta and Denny.

So far, the U.S. has not done that. After being asked by the procuraduria’s office, embassy officials in Bogota checked their records and found that one of the men had registered his U.S. home address with the embassy during a stay in Colombia. They refused to turn over that information to Colombian authorities.

Embassy officials said they are prevented by the Privacy Act from releasing any information. But, they said, if they receive a request from the prosecutor’s office, which currently does not have jurisdiction over the case, they might be able to help by working through existing treaties.

At least one State Department official has expressed reluctance to pursue the U.S. pilots. “Our job is to protect Americans, not investigate Americans,” one human rights group quoted the official as saying.

Nor has the embassy made much progress with promises it has made to have a copy of the tape its diplomats viewed independently analyzed. In 1998, Kamman said the tape he had seen would be reviewed for further analysis. Current Ambassador Anne W. Patterson made that same promise in a letter to Leahy in July 2001.

Human rights groups find it strange that the United States, which has urged Colombia for years to investigate possible human rights violations, is not doing the same.

“If the U.S. government is serious about promoting human rights, we think they have the legal duty to seriously investigate human rights violations,” Stahl said. “So far, we’ve been disappointed.”

Northwestern’s human rights center staged a mock trial of the Santo Domingo incident in 2000. They found the Colombian government responsible for the bombing.

Conclusion

For most of the three years since the bombing, the people of Santo Domingo were seen as liars, leftist sympathizers or guerrillas. It was only in recent years that some government officials came to believe them.

The tape proved to be an asset for them. The times and events recounted by the townspeople–who never saw the tape until recently and could not have known what it contained–are consistent with what the tape shows. The tape does show people with white material above their heads or in white clothing wandering the streets during the morning. The red truck does suffer damage between 9:45 and 10:10 a.m. And people can be seen loading what appear to be bodies onto a truck about 10:30 a.m.

To be sure, there are inconsistencies among the more than two dozen witnesses. Some say the bomb that struck Santo Domingo left a trail of smoke–an accurate description of the Skyfire rockets that other helicopters were firing at the guerrillas.

The tape does not corroborate the account of machine-gun bursts from a helicopter as the injured fled town in the flatbed truck. Though there are small holes in the road where the people said the helicopter fired at them, the video does not show the truck driver swerving, nor dirt or concrete being kicked up.

In December, the town held a ceremony to commemorate the third anniversary. There was a small parade, and one of the judges of the informal tribunal at Northwestern University flew in from Chicago. Victims and human rights workers gave speeches in the main square of Tame, the biggest nearby town.

Some families have split over the stress of lost children, shattered lives and the fight for recognition. Margarita Tilano and Olimpo Cardenas separated, for example, and now live in different towns.

Nancy Castillo’s husband left soon after her death, and her baby girl, now 3, is being cared for by relatives. Alba Garcia lives with her grandmother in a nearby town.

Most of those who remain in Santo Domingo dismiss the investigations. A civil suit is inching along, filed by 24 of the families. The average claim seeks damages of $5,000. The biggest is for $43,000.

“We want there to be justice, for sure,” said Maria Panqueva, the drugstore owner. “But we have lost the most beautiful thing we had: the trust in what’s right.”

Still others are worried about the future. For three years now, the people of Santo Domingo have challenged the Colombian military.

That sort of defiance may be enough to make them targets of Colombia’s violent paramilitary groups, which have recently moved into Arauca, allegedly with the support of local military officers.

The groups are known for the massacres of civilians they accuse of being rebel sympathizers. So far, Santo Domingo has not been touched. But in the surrounding area, more than 60 people have been killed by paramilitary fighters since August, allegedly including Riveros, the witness, and a congressional representative.

Those who remain in Santo Domingo worry about what nightmares may come.

“I have talked and talked and talked and talked. I have talked to investigators, to the military, to the press, to human rights groups. And I have told everyone the same thing,” said Tilano, who lost a child and two grandchildren in the bombing.

“If you want to do justice, do your work well,” she said, “so there will be no more massacres of children, so defenseless people won’t be killed, so they don’t shoot at us anymore.”

Times special correspondents Ruth Morris, Zoe Selsky and Mauricio Hoyos contributed to this report.

Copyright 2002 Los Angeles Times





Caño Limón: From an Oil Field to a Border Military Base

25 07 2010

By ALFREDO CARQUEZ SAAVEDRA – QUANTUM, November 16th 2004

Not only oil springs out of Caño Limón, but also serious labor problems, and even geopolitical uneasiness. Oscar Cañas Fajardo, an industrial relations technician for the oil industry and advisor of the Central Union of Workers, warns over rapidly increasing military presence in the Colombian side of the Arauca river, with the pretext of protecting the oil pipelines (from Caño Limón) against continual sabotage.Cañas assures that there are uniformed marines from the U.S. army, as well as war equipment, just a few kilometers from our borders; and accuses the transnational Occidental de Colombia Inc., a transnational oil company, of promoting a labor conflict at all costs with the intention of reducing the number of unionized workers on the payroll. “Occidental de Colombia intends to apply the same plan recently carried out by Ecopetrol, that is, promoting an artificial conflict with its employees, with the purpose of reducing the number of unionized workers on the payroll.”

Cañas comments that the oil industry labor union USO presented a set of petitions which, more than just a project of collective contracting “is a list of social benefits that represents less than 0.8% of their earnings. And this company is not really interested in discussing these issues. Its intention is to go beyond that.”

Commercial oil extraction in Caño Limón started in 1983. But the extraction of hydrocarbons had started in Colombia in 1905, upon the granting by the Colombian state of the Mares de Barranca Bermeja concession. The first transnational company, the Tropical Oil Company arrived in 1916. The USO was created in 1923; and in 1924, the first oil strike broke out. Nevertheless, this workers union had to wait 10 years to be officially acknowledged.

There are 264 wells under operation, with a yield of 98,000 barrels per day. Each barrel is enough to produce 21 gallons of gasoline, 4 of kerosene, 2 of asphalt, 1 of petrochemical derivatives, lubricants, fuel oil and motor fuel.

Under a contract named Cravo Norte, Occidental de Colombia and Ecopetrol participated in the activities in the Caño Limón field under the form of associations. The associations were 40 % for the U.S. company, 40 % for the Colombian state company, and 20% for the state. Participation was structured through royalties. At the same time, the state participation was also distributed: 47% for the regional government, 32% for the National Royalty Fund, 12% for the municipality, and 8% for the municipality of the port where the production is shipped.

But this contract, which stipulated that the field, as well as the infrastructure, would be turned over to the Colombian state upon its expiration in 2008, was modified last year with the signature of a new agreement called Chipirol agreement.

“And not only was the participation structure altered in that contract. At this moment, Occidental de Colombia owns 70% of the property against 30% owned by Colombia. The worst part is that the reservoir has been granted for good. But furthermore, after a negotiation by the National Hydrocarbon Agency, royalty payments were reduced to from 20% to only 8%, which means we are walking a in a direction that is totally opposite to the trend followed by Venezuela, which increased royalty payments from 1% to 16 2/3 %.”

Oil field, military base

Cañas reassures his warning: “there is a military build up going on in Caño Limón with the excuse of protecting the oil pipelines against constant sabotage explosions. But what is not mentioned is that these actions almost always take place in the same area and that there seems to be only a deal going on.”

Moreover -he comments- we have information that the U.S. government invested $92 million in the Caño Limón oil project, an amount that is not within Plan Colombia. And the National Congress has not assumed any position in the face of this situation. On the contrary, it has been silent in this issue.

According to the advisor of the USO “the greatest number of military and police officers are now in the Arauca Department, a region where there had not been serious cases of paramilitary action; and now we can see how their presence is being promoted in the area. And coincidentally, three members of the directive board of the Central Union of Workers (Central Unica de Trabajadores) were assassinated a couple of months ago.”

Cañas says that not only are there runways for military planes in Caño Limón but also tanks, artillery, reconnaissance planes, a strong Colombian military contingent, and a group of U.S. marines. “And who is to guarantee that all this, the reconnaissance planes; for instance, are not being used against Venezuela?” the interviewee wonders. The process against that country., -he points out- is not going to be directly carried out by U.S. military, but by their paramilitary aides; and maybe that’s why they are transforming the Caño Limón facilities into a small military fort.

This spokesman for the USO assures that Occidental de Colombia aims to wipe out the presence of a labor union “because it doesn’t want the presence of U.S. marines in the oil field to become public”.

Nevertheless, the labor conflict seems imminent, since last October 8th , the strike was approved by vote. If it is carried out, its effects will be felt beyond our borders, because it will be yet another straining factor on a market already subjected to uncertainty and speculators. Cañas also asserts that the multinational oil companies have imposed their will, regardless of the law; and even worse, he says that the controlling government agencies have either gone along, or been lenient with all this looting.

As for the behavior of the oil companies in the Indigenous areas, community spokesmen of the Uwa Indigenous community have put it in these words: “The rowa (the whites) that accumulate money are not willing to accept the justice of time and of our gods. And they want to drive us out of the last pieces of land we have left. Since the beginning of the last century, the oil companies, in alliance with the government, have become the new colonizers of all these territories; they want to offer trinkets to us in exchange for our lands and our lives.

Published in Quantum N.39

Alfredo Carquez Saavedra
Periodista venezolano experto en temas petroleros




COLOMBIA VS. VENEZUELA: Big Oil’s Secret War?

25 07 2010

COLOMBIA VS. VENEZUELA: Big Oil’s Secret War?

by Bill Weinberg

“Oilmen are like cats; you can never tell from the sound of them whether they are fighting or making love.”

–Calouste Gulbenkian

The famous Armenian entrepreneur spoke these words when reflecting on the post-World War I carve-up of oil rights in Iraq and the Persian Gulf at the 1928 summit of top world oil companies and Western governments at Ostend, Belgium. Now, with the world’s eyes on Iraq, a similar carve-up may be underway in South America’s Orinoco Basin and La Guajira, which together hold the planet’s greatest proven reserves outside the Persian Gulf. These adjacent oil-rich regions are both dissected by the border between Colombia, Washington’s closest ally on the hemisphere’s southern continent, and Venezuela–ruled by a left-populist government sharply at odds with the White House.

One man who would do well to heed Gulbenkian’s warning is Venezuela’s charismatic President Hugo Chavez, who has just entered an agreement with ChevronTexaco for a natural gas project that will span the Colombian border. Not only may the project cost Chavez the support of the indigenous peoples who inhabit the region, but Colombian trade unionists warn that U.S. oil companies operating in the Orinoco are deeply complicit in a plan by Washington and Colombia’s President Alvaro Uribe to prepare aggression against Venezuela across this militarized border.

Oil Field Becomes Military Base

The Colombian department of Arauca, heartland of that country’s oil industry, is one the most violent. It lies just across the Rio Arauca, an Orinoco tributary, from Venezuela’s own Orinoco Basin oil heartland of Apure-Barinas states.

The latest in a wave of recent massacres in Arauca came on March 6, when a group of local peasants were stopped at a roadblock set up by the 10th Front of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) near Cososito village in Tame municipality. An army detachment arrived in an armored vehicle, and immediately opened fire, killing three civilians on the spot. Among the dead was a member of the local Guahibo indigenous people; and a child of six was among the injured, according to an account by the Bogota human rights group Humanidad Vigente. (A month later, the 10th Front boasted in a press release it had wiped out a detachment of 17 government troops in ambush near Tame in retaliation for the attack.)

The main oil field in Arauca is at Cano-Limon, run by California-based Occidental Petroleum in a joint partnership with the Colombia state company Ecopetrol. Many of the 800 U.S. military advisors in Colombia are assigned to Arauca, and since last year they have been overseeing a new Colombian army unit specially created to police Cano-Limon against guerilla attack. This project, which Occidental lobbied for heavily, marks a departure from the erstwhile U.S. policy of only assisting ostensible narcotics enforcement operations in Colombia. As the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) noted in a report last October: “In early 2003, US personnel embarked on their first major non-drug initiative, a plan to help Colombia’s army protect an oil pipeline and re-take territory in the conflictive department of Arauca, near the Venezuelan border.” Over this same period, Humanidad Vigente has reported a huge upsurge in paramilitary activity in Arauca.

Now, a leader of Colombia’s oil workers union claims that the U.S. military is actually transforming Cano-Limon into a base intended for launching attacks against Venezuela. Oscar Canas Fajardo, advisor to Colombia’s Central Workers Union, or CUT, speaking with Venezuelan journalist Alfredo Carquez Saavedra of Quantum magazine in November, said: “There is a military build-up going on in Cano-Limon with the excuse of protecting the oil pipelines against constant sabotage explosions… They are transforming the Cano-Limon facilities into a small military fort.” He claims U.S. advisors and military surveillance planes are now based at the oil field. Noting proximity to the border and recent reports of Colombian paramilitary attacks on the Venezuelan side of the line, he asks rhetorically, “Who is to guarantee that all this [is] not being used against Venezuela?

Axis of Propaganda

U.S. training of Colombian military personnel is rapidly escalating. According to the WOLA report, the U.S. trained 12,947 Colombian troops in 2003–more than the total 12,930 for all Latin America in 1999. (The total for Latin America in ’03 was 22,855.) And Washington is launching a major propaganda push against Venezuela at the moment.

A March statement from the well-connected Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), “South America–the Next Swamp?,” warns that even as the U.S. is “draining the swamp” in Afghanistan, “ideological killers are regrouping with the aid of leftist governments and drug lords” in the western hemisphere. The principal “leftist government” in question is, of course, that of Hugo Chavez.

Writes JINSA: “A British newspaper reports that the IRA is conducting mortar training in the Venezuelan jungle for the Marxist Colombian FARC. Photographs show the jungle training camp of three IRA terrorists who fled Colombia where they had been sentenced to 17 years in jail for terrorist training… The Chavez government in Venezuela has pursued close relations with Fidel Castro… Chavez has ordered MIG-29s from Russia and 100,000 Kalashnikov rifles. Who are they planning to shoot? Or to whom are they going to give them?”

JINSA was, of course, a top advocate and architect for Washington’s Iraq adventure. One prominent JINSA advisor is Richard Perle, head of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board at the time of the Iraq invasion. Former JINSA advisory board members include Pentagon policy advisor Douglas Feith and current nominee for ambassador to the UN, John Bolton.

The British newspaper account JINSA cites is from the London Sunday Times of March 13. It concerns three accused Irish Republican Army militants who jumped bail and disappeared following their conviction in Colombia last year on charges of providing the FARC with mortar training. The story cited Colombian government claims of satellite data indicating the three have established a training camp on Venezuelan territory in the Sierra de Perija, a branch of the Andes whose divide forms the international border heading north from Arauca.

Another salvo comes from Otto Reich, until December 2002 Bush’s assistant secretary of state for hemispheric affairs and subsequently a member of the National Security Council staff. Reich has the cover story in the April 11 edition of National Review, entitled “THE AXIS OF EVIL… Western Hemisphere Version”–sporting a photo of Chavez with Fidel Castro, both in fashionable military fatigues.

Writes Reich: “The first task of the U.S., and whatever coalition of the willing it can muster in the region, is to confront the dangerous alliance posed by Cuba and Venezuela.” He does not fail to link this Latin Axis of Evil to the traditional Eurasian one, noting Chavez’ pledge to Iranian President Mohammed Khatami to cut off oil to the U.S. in the event of military aggression against Tehran. He also blasts “Chavez’s misappropriation of Venezuela’s extraordinary oil wealth”–by which he presumably means the diversion of profits into literacy campaigns and other programs to improve the lot of Venezeula’s poor.

Miami-Bogota: The Real “Axis of Evil”?

2005 began with a dramatic deterioration in Colombia-Venezuela relations following the Colombian government’s admission that it sent bounty-hunters to abduct FARC representative Rodrigo Granda Escobar in Caracas, Venezuela’s capital, on Dec. 13. The incident prompted a cut-off in trade and diplomatic ties between the two nations. On Jan. 23, tens of thousands of Chavez supporters marched in Caracas to protest the violation of Venezuela’s sovereignty. Some carried banners reading “Bush: Venezuela is Not Iraq!” Speaking that same day, Chavez accused the U.S. of being behind the affair: “This provocation came from Washington, it is the latest attempt by the imperialists…to ruin our relations with Colombia.” U.S. Ambassador to Colombia William Wood stated that the U.S. was “100% behind Colombia,” and State Department spokesmen began accusing Venezuela of providing a safe-haven for Colombian guerillas. Chavez, in turn, accused Washington of trying to foment war between Venezuela and Colombia, and even plotting to assassinate him.

The situation de-escalated in mid-February, when, following the mediation of Brazil, Peru, Cuba and Spain, both sides agreed to restore full relations and cooperate on border security. But given the profusion of armed groups in the border zone, there is much potential for re-escalation. Last September, unidentified gunmen ambushed a commission from the Venezuelan state oil company PDVSA working on a surveying project in Apure state near the Colombian border, killing a company engineer and six soldiers–one grim instance of Colombia’s endemic violence spilling across the frontier into Venezuela’s oil zone.

Another came in late March when the Ezequiel Zamora National Campesino Front (FNCEZ), a civil peasant organization in Barinas state, reported that one of their activists had been hacked to death by the hired thugs of a local landowner, who they had denounced for disguising his idle lands through bureaucratic means to prevent their being expropriated under Venezuela’s agrarian reform law. FNCEZ accused the landowner of maintaining a private army of some 20 men, with links to Colombian paramilitaries.

And last May, more than 50 men said to be Colombia paramilitaries were arrested at an estate outside Caracas, on charges of planning a coup to remove Chavez in league with opposition businessmen and military officers. Chavez also directly implicated the U.S. “Miami and Colombia are two points of an axis…where the invasion of Venezuela has been planned, trained and prepared,” proclaimed Chavez, pointing to the “criminal hand of a group of evildoers.”

Strategic Sierra

Despite these tensions, Chavez is inviting new multinational investment for the oil zone–and even an ambitious trans-border project with Colombia. In August 2001, Texaco, PDVSA and Ecopetrol signed a memorandum of understanding for a feasibility study on a new pipeline linking natural gas fields of La Guajira, on Colombia’s Caribbean coast, to Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela’s main export terminal.

In May 2003, PDVSA announced new oil finds of up to 2.4 billion barrels in the Orinoco Basin, and sought foreign partners to develop the fields. Texaco–which merged with Chevron to form ChevronTexaco in 2001–immediately proposed building another pipeline to pump the crude to the coast. Just days ago, on April 1, 2005, ChevronTexaco and the Spanish firm Repsol-YPF announced that they would be jointly investing $6 billion in the new oil field.

But oil companies definitely have a sweeter deal on the Colombian side of the border, where Uribe is moving to free the industry from public oversight. Chavez, in contrast, has boosted royalties private companies must pay the Venezuelan government to fund his ambitious social programs.

The new pipeline connecting ChevronTexaco’s gas fields in the Colombian department of La Guajira to Venezuela’s Lake Maracaibo would have to cross the Sierra de Perija, where Uribe and JINSA now claim a FARC-IRA training camp is operating. La Guajira itself is among Colombia’s most violent regions, with a string of assassinations of indigenous leaders by presumed paramilitary forces reported already this year. The new pipeline may carry war and human rights abuses to Venezuela as well as gas.

On April 4, hundreds of representatives of the Bari, Yukpa and Wayuu indigenous peoples from the Venezuelan side of the Sierra de Perija, clad in traditional dress and wielding bows and arrows, marched in Caracas to demand a halt to coal mining operations near their traditional lands.

“We want to tell companero President Hugo Chavez that he can’t continue granting land concessions in the Sierra and in Guajira without consulting us first, as required by the constitution,” said Wayuu community leader Angela González.

The indigenous protestors made clear they supported Chavez, who instated guarantees of indigenous autonomy in his new constitution in 1999. Many wore red berets, symbol of the ruling Fifth Republic Movement. “Companero Chavez, support our cause,” read one sign, according to an Inter-Press Service account.

ChevronTexaco and Shell are among a handful of foreign firms operating coal mines in the Sierra in joint ventures with the Venezuelan state company Carbozulia. The coal is currently transported by truck to Maracaibo, the port and regional capital, but there are plans to construct a rail line for this purpose, as well to build a deep sea port in the Gulf of Venezuela, just to Maracaibo’s north. The new gas pipeline would be another artery through this same conflicted border zone.

The deep sea port project is part of a continental scheme known as the Initiative for South American Regional Infrastructure Integration (IIRSA), being promoted by the Inter-American Development Bank. Lusbi Portillo of Homo et Natura, a Venezuelan environmental group that supported the indigenous protesters, told Inter-Press Service, “We are opposed to these mining-port projects that form part of the IIRSA, which will serve to take our energy, mining, forestry and biodiversity resources to Europe and the United States.”

Hugo Chavez is in a difficult position. He needs more oil and gas revenues to fund the populist social programs which guarantee his support among the peasants and urban poor. But cooperation with the multinational industrial agenda for the bloody border zone may cost him his support among indigenous peoples. Worse still, by welcoming oil companies which appear to be cooperating in a destabilization drive, he could be making a noose for his own neck.

——





Columbia Staking-Out Caribbean Oil Claims

25 07 2010
[We are finally getting to the bottom of why the current confrontation is taking place between Columbia and Venezuela; the reason why the 4th Fleet is parked in Costa Rica.  Exploration rights to the following active blocks in the Caribbean have just been awarded, in the 2010 Open Round conducted by Colombia's National Hydrocarbon Agency ("ANH"). If you are a corporation, you can see the list of the 78 companies who won the bidding on July 5. ]

 

Los Cayos Basin is located in the Colombian Caribbean Sea. It limits to the W with Nicaragua (meridian 82), and to the N with the Colombia and Jamaica joint area. It has a total area of 126 591 km2 of which approximately 100 km2 correspond to emerged areas.

The Guajira Basin is placed at the north-eastern corner of Colombia. It is limited by two regional wrench faults, supposed to represent the contact between the Caribbean and South American plates.

Nicaragua also threatens to Colombia militarmene

By: AFP
“We have an army that is very quickly in the defense of sovereignty threatened,” said Ortega.

The president of Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega said Saturday that the army “is ready” to defend the sovereignty if Colombia allows oil concessions in a sea area that both countries played in the Caribbean.

“I have to express (…) tonight we have an army that is very quickly in the defense of sovereignty threatened by the expansionist policy which has been Colombia,” Ortega said during a rally in Managua.

Ortega referred to the Colombia oil concessions offered on the seafront that the two countries are in dispute in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) since 2001.

On Wednesday the president, however, also said, speaking on the subject, that Nicaragua has no intention of entering into a confrontation with Colombia, but will assert their rights before the International Court.

Nicaragua in December 2001 asked the ICJ to recognize their dominance over 50,000 km2 of territorial waters in the Caribbean, including the sovereignty of the islands of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina, Roncador Cays, Quitasueño and Serranilla , held by Colombia.

  • Afp | Elespectador.com





Can Armenia Win Karabakh By Recognizing Abkhazia and S. Ossetia?

25 07 2010

Abkhazia and South Ossetia Tied to The Nagorno Karabakh

February 25, 2010 Armenia No Comments

“It is possible that in the nearest future Armenia will recognize the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia”, -Yuri Manukyan, the head of the United Communist Party, thinks. Today on the press conference he said that recognition of those two countries will have a serious influence over the destiny of the Nagorno Karabakh Republic.

“About Georgia’s friendship we know long before. We remember that in 90s the only little window leaf was left by Iran. We were in blockade from 4 sides”, – he recalled and added that we should take the road Russia points us.

According to Yu. Manukyan, Armenia should recognize the independence of Abkhazia without hurry.

“It shouldn’t be done hastily as we still have the Karabakh issue and Russia has to show its attitude towards the future developments of that issue.”

Source: AysorOriginal Article





Armenia See Kosovo Ruling As Opening For Nagorno-Karabakh Independence

25 07 2010

Bako Sahakyan: Ruling of the Hague Court creates a new political situation

Public Radio of Armenia

“Irrespective of recognition of independence of Kosovo, Nagorno Karabakh will continue working towards international recognition of the Artsakh Republic,” NKR President Bako Sahakyan told reporters in Stepanakert. The President assessed the decision of the Hague Court as an important event that creates a new political situation.

In response to the question about the policy Armenia pursues in the negotiation process, Bako Sahakyan said: “The policy Armenia implements is obviously constructive and contributes to the settlement of the Karabakh issue. The Armenian President does not pursue a radical policy, a fact welcomed by both us and the international community.” “In response to that Azerbaijan takes steps to fail the negotiation process,” he added.

The Karabakhi side is doing its best to contribute to the effective activity of the OSCE Minsk Group. However, according to President Sahakyan, the Minsk Group fails to achieve better results because NKR does not participate in the talks. “The Co-Chairs have also come to understand that the solution is impossible without the participation of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Karabakh,” he stated.

Touching upon the possible change of the Minsk Group format, particularly Iran’s claims, Bako Sahakyan said such changes of the format cannot contribute to the effectiveness of the Minsk Group activity.

According to NKR President, the position of Artsakh has not changed over years. “The independence and security of Artsakh cannot be subject to any bargain,” he said.

As to the recognition of NKR by the Republic of Armenia, Bako Sahakyan said “this recognition should not be an end in itself. It’s a process that should have proper grounds. Sure, the Artsakh Republic is most interested in this, but it cannot ignore the fact that Armenia has certain commitments before the international community.





Unite from Parachinar to Karachi

25 07 2010

Unite from Parachinar to Karachi

– by Riaz Toori

Scenic Parachinar is sieged by the ISI sponsored Deobandi terrorists of the Taliban and Sipah-e-Sahaba

Source: The Express Tribune

Scenic Parachinar belies an undeclared human rights free zone where they have no legal protection.

Years ago, when in my hometown Parachinar and in other tribal areas, malicious actions were initiated by inhuman terrorists against innocent and peace-loving people, I had written an article titled “Let think for Pakistan”. At the time, I hadn’t imagined that this article would be momentous and significant even years later. But unfortunately, today Pakistan is confronted with more miserable conditions than before.

We are in a quagmire of socio-economic and security problems set against a backdrop of ethnic and religious intolerance. From Parachinar to Karachi, the lives of human beings are at great risk. The terrorists have pushed Pakistan into a blind street where only political reconciliation, wisdom and unity with persistence in fighting terrorism can prove beneficial. Fortification through diplomatic wisdom has never been as pressing a need for Pakistan as it is today. There were no uncertainties that the allies of the “War on Terror” would fail and this would hurl Pakistan into a political mire.

I had told the government of that time that a spark of terrorism from the tribal areas could overtake the whole country soon if fierce action combined with wise strategy was not adopted against the miscreants in disparity to the strategy of combating USSR as we had a most terrible experience of the so-called Jihad against USSR.

Had the think tanks inside Pakistan chalked out a wise strategy with future planning, today there would have been no adverse impact on our society. At present, “War on Terror” has turned Pakistani streets into a breeding ground of terrorism. Terrorists got their strength in the worst days of dictatorship when public will, country constitution and state institutions had been rendered worthless and those who mattered in the country were busy in salvaging the one-man illicit regime. Today the entire nation is paying a heavy price for the dirt spread by two oppressors Zia-ul Haq and Musharraf.

Today tribal areas are breeding grounds of terrorism; life of mankind is hellish there due to the presence of terrorists in their soil. But, Tribesmen are braver and more spirited than the government of Punjab in challenging and condemning terrorists and terrorism. No tribesman nowadays has a soft corner for terrorists and no tribesman is convinced by their propaganda that they are doing everything for the well-being of Islam. Shoulder to shoulder with Pakistan Army, they are fighting against the terrorists.

Millions of Pakistanis in Parachinar – the upper part of Kurram Agency – live in a human rights free zone where they have no legal protection are subject to abuses by the Taliban on Thal-Parachinar Road. Millions of people are effectively living under the Taliban in lower part of Kurram Agency, Hangu and adjacent areas of the Thal-Parachinar Road.
On July 17, 2010 19 innocent passengers from Parachinar including 9 women have been brutally killed by terrorists on this road near Hangu. Hitherto more than 250 men, women and children are gun downed very maliciously on this road by Taliban.

Earlier to this incident, 106 tribesmen killed in a suicide bomb blast in Mohmand Agency outside Agency Political Agency office and many killed in a suicide blast in Mingora Swat. A non-stop genocide war against the poor, oppressed and ill-fated tribesmen has continued over a decade.
Let us take some obligatory and immediate steps for saving Pakistan and making it a peaceful part of the globe by uprooting extremism, targeting sources of terrorism, fierce actions against banned organizations, condemning those political powers abetting banned organizations and giving up any double games over the issue of terrorism and extremism.

Tribesmen want severe measures against the miscreants and criminals who have unlawfully captured their earthly paradise and made their lives miserable. Tribal people will remain steadfast in ridding their home towns of the enemies of humanity.





BLA Claim Major Assault On Pak. Army Forces, 15 Soldiers Killed In Kohlu

25 07 2010

BLA claim to have killed 15 Pakistan army soldiers

on 2010/7/23 0:00:00 (69 reads)
ccupied Balochistan: Azaad Baluch a spokesperson of Baluch Liberation Army has claimed that fighters from his organisation have attacked a convoy of Pakistan army in Kohlu, Marri agency. According the Mr Baluch 15 Pakistani army soldiers were killed in that attack and dozen were wounded.

Baluch fighters attacked the Pakistan army convoy with latest automatic weapons which resulted in complete destruction of five army vehicles, claimed the BLA statement. However the government source did not confirm the attack and killing for soldiers so far.

It is worth noting that few days back the Pakistani forces had started a massive military offensive in several region of Marri area. National media and local independent sources had reported that several people had been arrested and taken to unknown locations. The residents of the area had claimed that the initiation of the operation was meant to pave the way for further exploitation of massive coalmines in the region.





Anti-War Baloch Nationalist Leader Escapes IED Attack

25 07 2010

The Baloch Hal News

QUETTA: A senator of Pakistan Muslim League (Quaid-e-Azam faction) Senator Mir Mohabbat Khan Maari and his convoy escaped an attempt on their lives in Kohlu on Saturday, the official news agency reported.

According to details, unknown men had placed a bomb along the road side that went off barely a minute apart after the convoy of Senator Mir Mohabbat Khan Marri passed by the area. Marri is a staunch critic of Baloch nationalists and the ongoing armed struggle in the province.

Though the blast caused no damage, local authorities said they believed Marri was the actual target of a plot meant to execute a political murder.

No one has accepted responsibility for the attempt on the senator’s life.





Another Baloch National Party Leader Attacked–Brother Killed

25 07 2010

[It is glaringly obvious that those who are killing-off all the moderate national leaders in Balochistan are determined to ignite civil war.  Whose interests would be served more by full-scale war in Balochistan, the Pakistani Army or the United States?  One thing is for certain--the Army is not defenseless to resist the sinister forces who are killing-off a political party.  If the Pakistani Army was not behind these assassinations then they would be doing something to stop the attacks, or at least to find those who are responsible.  It is hard to imagine that war is what they want, but that seems to be their solution for creating an international strategic corridor through Balochistan and protection for the pipelines which follow]

NP Leader Khalid Langov’s Younger Brother Killed in Kalat

The Baloch Hal News

QUETTA: A younger brother of Mir Khalid Langove, a central leader of the National Party, was killed and three other members of the Langove tribe were injured in a deadly attack on the van of the Mir Khalid Langove on Saturday evening.

According to the details,Mir Khalid Langove and his younger brother were returning to Quetta after offering Fateha at the residence of Mir Najeeb Langove when they were attacked. Multiple bullets hit the car of Mr. Khalid but he remained safe. However, his younger brother Mir Ziab Langove was killed after several shots hit him.

” I am clueless about the murders,” said Khalid Langove, ” I have no enmity with anyone. I can only wait and pray to God to bring the perpetrators to justice on the Day of Judgment.”

Mir Zaib Lango was traveling along his brother in a convoy of cars along with his security guards while heading towards Quetta when unidentified armed men ridding on a motorbike in Kili Darakzai area of Manguchar ambushed and opened fire on them.

As result of firing, four of them sustained multiple bullet wounds. The attackers managed to flee from the spot. The injured were taken to Quetta for treatment while Zaib Langove succumbed to his injuries on his way to hospital. It is believed Mr. Khalid Langove was the main target of the attack which he luckily survived.

Senior administration officials and notables rushed to the spot where the incident took place. Officials started the investigations and so far no one had claimed the responsibility for the deadly attack on Mir Zaib Lango lost his life.

Mir Khalid Langove, the brother of the diseased, is a prominent leader of the National Party, a central leader of which, Mir Maula Baksh Dashti, was killed in Turbat two weeks ago.

The National Party has strongly condemned the killing of its leaders’ younger brother. The party has given the call for a complete shutter down strike on Sunday.





Two extremes digging in their heels

25 07 2010

Two extremes digging in their heels

By Cyril Almeida
On the Baloch side, the armed radicals are bent on intimidating, perhaps even eliminating, moderate voices, making the possibility of a compromise with the state that much more distant. — Photo by AFP

ISLAMABAD: The killing of Habib Jalib Baloch on July 15 has sent a wave of concern across Balochistan and Islamabad that the insurgency in the province has entered a dangerous new phase.

Mr Jalib was the secretary general of the Balochistan National Party led by Akhtar Mengal, a moderate party considered to be secular, middle class and at a remove from the oppressive sardari system that dominates politics in the province.

While publicly Mr Jalib’s death has been blamed by Baloch leaders on the intelligence agencies, there is growing concern in the ranks of some nationalist groups that hard-line Baloch separatists may be eliminating those willing to work inside the Pakistani federation.

“We are in a very difficult position,” Senator Hasil Bizenjo of the NP said. “The message to us is that people talking about nationalist politics, about staying within the federation, will not be spared.”

According to Mr Bizenjo, the BNP-M and NP are viewed as collaborators by the separatist forces. “They (the hardliners) say, ‘We are being killed by the ISI and you people are working for them.’ ”

The killings — Mr Jalib was the third former BSO chairman and one of a dozen Baloch leaders killed in the last three years — raise a more fundamental question: why is the cycle of violence still continuing in Balochistan?

While the violence is down from the 2005-2008 peak period, the Pakistani state and parts of the Baloch population are undeniably still locked in conflict.

In a series of conversations with Dawn, senior government and army officials and Baloch representatives attempted to explain why, in their view, a conflict that has claimed between 500 and 1,500 lives since 2001 continues today.

Foremost is the issue of missing persons.

Estimates vary wildly: the Baloch claim thousands of fellow citizens are missing; rights groups like the HRCP suggest a figure in the low hundreds; the army acknowledges no more than a few dozen missing. Yet, it isn’t necessarily the detentions per se but the lack of information about the detainees that makes the missing-persons issue so incendiary.

“We asked them (the army) to do two things. One, produce all the missing persons in court and file charges against them. Two, allow the families to meet them,” according to Hasil Bizenjo.

A senior federal minister involved in discussions concerning Balochistan concurred: “We weren’t even asking to set them free. But they (the army) weren’t willing to listen because they considered them (the missing persons) to be treasonous. We said, they may have done things they need to be punished for, but they are still Pakistanis and we have to treat them as such.”

Army officers deny the charge. A high-ranking officer claimed that comprehensive internal investigations have been conducted: “We’ve looked and we haven’t found anything. It’s a myth, one of those unfortunate consequences of this situation.”

The army does admit nearly 30 suspects are in the custody of agencies such as the ISI, MI and Corps Intelligence and are being investigated by Joint Investigation Teams. In addition, senior officers admit some of the missing have been killed in encounters.

Beyond that, high-ranking officers claim they are ready to investigate any and every case of alleged disappearances brought to their attention.

That does not cut ice with rights groups.

Ali Dayan Hasan of the Human Rights Watch says, “It’s the state’s responsibility to protect its people. If the families are claiming people are missing, then the MI should prove that they aren’t. Find these people and show us where they are.”

Part of the problem, according to Hasil Bizenjo, is that the army does not understand the impact of missing persons. “Balochistan is a backward society. If you pick up a boy from a village, you make an enemy of the entire village.”

The depth of anger over the missing persons can be gauged from the fact that it has dislodged as the central complaint the decades-old grievance of the Baloch: that the province’s gas and mineral riches have been exploited by the Pakistani state.

No one, not even army officers, denies that reality.

Referring to the disparity in the gas price offered to Balochistan and the other provinces, Petroleum and Natural Resources Minister Naveed Qamar explained: “There was definitely an anomaly in pricing. Sui was discovered in the mid ’50s and the subsequent increases in the price were made using the original price as a benchmark. Qadirpur (in Sindh) was priced using the benchmark of international oil prices. That doesn’t justify it, though. It was wrong.”

However, Mr Qamar disputes the notion the centre is still exploiting Balochistan’s resources: “Over the last 18 months, significant change has come about. We’ve fixed the gas-price anomaly to a large extent. Rikodiq (where large reserves of gold and copper are reported to exist) has been handed over to the provincial government and Saindak will be soon.”

Even so, perceptions about the intentions of the army and ‘centrist’ bureaucrats in Islamabad linger.

“It’s about greed. They want Balochistan’s resources to create prosperity in the other provinces,” claimed Syeda Abida Hussain, co-founder with her husband, Fakhar Imam, of the Friends of Baloch and Balochistan.

“It’s no longer about the resource-sharing at present. It’s about the potential,” Naveed Qamar suggested. “Balochistan contributes 17 or 18 per cent of gas today to Pakistan’s needs, but the vast resources that are still untapped because of the security situation, that is the real prize.”

The Baloch look no further for modern-day proof of the Pakistani state’s intention to ‘colonise’ Balochistan than the port at Gwadar. “There are these beautiful, paved boulevards in the port area. And right outside the poverty of the Baloch is shocking,” said Sanaullah Baloch, a former BNP-M senator. “Gwadar has nothing to do with concern for the Baloch.”

If the Baloch, army and government do agree on one thing, it is that a great deal of the blame for the violence continuing must be shouldered by the Balochistan government.

The February 2008 provincial elections were boycotted by the moderate Baloch parties such as the BNP-M and NP, an “unintended consequence that we didn’t understand at the time”, according to a senior army official, and which “the province is paying for”.

The provincial government is widely perceived to be epically corrupt and monumentally inefficient. That has real consequences.

For one, it allows the army to deflect attention from the heavy-handedness of the Frontier Corps, which is still tasked with law and order duties. Practically speaking, it becomes difficult to debate the withdrawal of the FC, a major demand of the Baloch, when the police are incapable of establishing even a modicum of law and order.

The provincial government’s incompetence also impacts on the possibility of winning over disaffected Baloch. “They’ve got all this extra money,” Naveed Qamar said referring to the Rs12 billion of new resources-related payments to the province, “but will it make its way to the people? That’s a big question mark.”

Another commonality among the Baloch, government officials and army officers spoken to: none were optimistic the violence will abate soon.

In fact, many suggested the two extremes appear to be digging in their heels.

On the Baloch side, the armed radicals are bent on intimidating, perhaps even eliminating, moderate voices, making the possibility of a compromise with the state that much more distant.

On the army’s side, while it fiercely denies it has a ‘colonial’ approach towards Balochistan, there is a steely resolve to prevent any ‘mischief’ by outside powers in the province — an approach which severely diminishes the possibility of concessions towards the Baloch extremists.

“If the federation is to survive, the moderates need to be heard,” according to Raza Rabbani. The trouble is, no one seems to believe that is an imminent possibility.





THE BP PLOT–(Waging Economic War For the Corporations)

25 07 2010

THE BP PLOT

BP oil spill viewed from space.

The plot:

Exxon does not have enough oil fields.

(Is Exxon Mobil’s future running dry? – MSN MoneyExxon Reserves – WSJ.com)

Reportedly, Exxon wants to take over BP.

Allegedly, sabotage takes place.

The BP share price drops and BP becomes a takeover target.

To further hurt BP, the US blames BP for the release of the innocent Megrahi.

Reportedly, the evidence in the Lockerbie trial was faked to cover up ‘alleged’ CIA drug smuggling involving Monzer al Kassar.

The drug smuggling was to have been revealed by Major Charles McKee and his team who were travelling on PanAm 103 with their evidence.

The oil spill story may have been exaggerated?

Around 750 boats drafted in to scoop up oil from the Gulf of Mexico are having ‘trouble’ finding any crude in the sea, a top US official has said.

“We are starting to have trouble finding oil,” US pointman Admiral Thad Allen, who is in charge of handling the government’s response, told reporters.

The boats are “really having to search for the oil in some cases” around the area of the capped well, he added. (AFP: Gulf boats having trouble finding any oil: US official)

(Thanks to Dublin Mick for the link)

The USA is angry that BP is to drill for oil off the coast of Libya. (BP to begin deep-water drilling off coast of Libya)

If Exxon takes over BP, Exxon gets more oil, including that off the coast of Libya.
In 1975, the CIA’s Philip Agee testified that he had conducted personal name checks of employees for a subsidiary of what is now Exxon.

Exxon was “letting the CIA assist in employment decisions, and my guess is that those name checks…are continuing to this day.”(Philip Agee – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)


Halliburton bought an oil cleanup company days before BP explosion.

(Halliburton to Buy Boots & Coots for $232 Million – FOXBusiness.com)

A BP report refers to tampering with well sealing equipment.(False Flag )

Important people sold BP shares just before the explosion

The Obama regime may use the BP disaster to push for a Carbon Tax and to change the ownership of BP.

Does the US government hope that a US company can grab BP?

In December 2008 we read in The Telegraph that “The most startling takeover target of the year will be BP, which will attract interest from Exxon Mobil…

“BP will be historically cheap by most measures…” - After a year of shocks, prepare for more in 2009

The days when water was cleaner.

On 8 June 2010, Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones atPrisonplanet.com, wrote that evidence points to the BP oil spill being a False Flag

Among the points made:

1. On 12 April 2010, just over one week before the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded, Halliburton bought Boots & Coots, an oil well control company.

Halliburton is named in the majority of some two dozen lawsuitsfiled since the explosion by Gulf Coast people and businesses who claim that the company is to blame for the disaster.

Halliburton carried out a cementing operation on the Deepwater Horizon rig 20 hours before the accident.

The lawsuits claim that four Halliburton workers stationed on the rig improperly capped the well.

2. BP’s prepared testimony briefing notes that the Hydraulic Control System on equipment designed to automatically seal the well in an emergency was modified without their knowledge sometime before the explosion.

3. Goldman Sachs dumped 44% of its shares in BP Oil not long before the BP accident.

Other asset management firms also sold huge blocks of BP stock in the first quarter.

Before the accident, Wachovia, owned by Wells Fargo, sold 98% of its shares in BP and Swiss bank UBS sold 97% of its BP shares.

As reported by the London Telegraph on June 5th 2010, Tony Hayward, the chief executive of BP, sold £1.4 million of his shares in BP weeks before the spill.

4. The Obama administration is renewing talk of a carbon tax and has created the opportunity to reintroduce the idea of nationalizing oil, which the Democratic leadership has long sought.

Market Analyst: ‘BP’s Not Going to Last as a Company More Than a Matter of Months’

aangirfan: ECONOMIC WARFARE – BP SABOTAGED?





Pentagon Contracts In Central Asia Prove That Afghanistan Is Struggle For Profit

25 07 2010

[This monster Special Forces base being built in Mazar-i-Sharif, the new Special Forces training center in Osh, Kyrgyzstan (formerly planned for Batken), another Special Forces center in Uzbekistan, as well as the border checkpoints being built in Tajikistan and other places, speaks volumes about the real US intentions in the former Soviet territory.  Under the Partnership For Peace Program, the American military is planting roots deeply, with no plans for uprooting the operations after the Afghan war is settled.  Having forgotten about the original causes of the terror war long ago, the Afghan war and all the military expansions justified because of it are clearly exposed as resource grabbing operations in the pipeline wars.  The only thing that "our troops are defending" is anticipated higher profits for Exxon, Shell, Unocal and all the rest of the profiteers.

"Support our troops," my ass!]

The Pentagon is planning steps to strengthen the case of fighters in northern Afghanistan and Central Asia





Waging Psywar In Central Asia To Keep American Cotton King

25 07 2010

[Another case of the American government waging psychological warfare against foreign competitors of American industry.  By black-listing cotton growers in Central Asia for using “child labor,” underhanded American bureaucrats are attempting to grab an even bigger share of world cotton exports than the one-third of total global sales we own today.]

image

http://www.cottonusa.org

The price of cotton in Central Asia or the competitiveness of the American

K. Korolev

Price of cotton in Central Asia or the competitiveness of the American
U.S. Department of Labor is once again coming forth a list of countries, under which U.S. federal agencies are supplying prohibited goods and products manufactured using the so-called "Forced child labor." Certainly the nobility of this high mission, no one is somneniya.Somneniya arise when one wonders: – on the basis of what information drawn up this "list" on how much it is reliable? Leaving the answers to these questions on the conscience of the drafters of this "list", will try to answer the main question, and who benefits? And then everything falls into place.
It is noteworthy that in addition to electronics and toys from China, clothing, embroidery, and fabrics from Argentina, India and Thailand and some other goods, the list got cotton or seeds from virtually all countries – the major producers. Among them are China, India, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and a group of other countries, producing high quality cotton.
Everyone knows that America today is the world’s first exporter of cotton fiber. Only in 2009 on the foreign market was sold more than 2,7 million tons. cotton. However, in 2010 the U.S. plans to sell on the world market more than 3,2 million tons. significantly increasing its share, but will it?
Apparently, so someone does not sleep that high-quality cotton from Central Asia and other countries included in the "black list" consistently displace low-quality, genetically modified American cotton from the world markets.
Probably somewhere in here and need to seek an answer to a question, and who will benefit initiate these "black lists", and whether their release is a sophisticated method of unfair competition, where fair competition in the markets lost.
Hence, the desire for others to solve their own problems, thus offering the pressure on countries importing cotton and thus solving the serious problems encountered by American manufacturers and exporters.
Evidence of this are the current quotations of cotton fiber, when American cotton is quoted as the cheapest in the world, after the price even producers from Africa.
At the same time, today there is high demand for Central Asian cotton, which is due to its high quality is now the most expensive and is quoted at 10% more expensive than the U.S.. However, compared with last year, he sold an average of 486 dollars per ton more expensive and exports carried out on the market more than 25 countries.
The most interesting thing in this story is that U.S. government officials forget that the countries of Central Asia do not sell and do not want to sell cotton to the United States, the textile sector are more dead than alive (as a result of competition from China).
In contrast, the countries of Central Asia on the contrary develop a national textile industry and in a systematic manner reducing exports of cotton fiber. Its share in total exports of the region is about 10%, and in the future will be significantly reduced.

Konstantin Korolev
25/07/2010

Source – White Sail





Formerly Known As “Great” Britain–redefining its global status

25 07 2010

Britain: redefining its global status

HASAN SUROOR

British Prime Minister David Cameron and U.S. President Barack Obama hold a joint news conference in Washington, on July 20. Mr. Cameron has admitted that he sees Britain only as America's “junior partner.”

British Prime Minister David Cameron and U.S. President Barack Obama hold a joint news conference in Washington, on July 20. Mr. Cameron has admitted that he sees Britain only as America’s “junior partner.”

There is a growing view that Britain must now abandon its search for a post-Raj role and learn to live by the new world order in which those it once governed are masters.

British Prime Minister David Cameron is set to visit India soon, maybe as early as next week, seeking an “enhanced” relationship — a nice-sounding resolve even though few in London or New Delhi appear to know how it would translate into action. The visit is less about outcomes (the two countries don’t have major issues to resolve, so any outcome would be hailed as a success) and more about symbolism as the new administration sets out to rebrand the British foreign policy amid a raging debate over where Britain fits in the “new” world.

Britain’s global status, long in decline, has plummeted to a new low, partly because of the broader shift of power from the West to the East and more specifically because London has simply run out of steam as an international power.

The view that Britain has failed to find a role for itself on the global stage since the loss of the empire may have become a bit of a cliché but it is a cliché that can do with some repetition. Britain ceased to be taken seriously long ago even by its erstwhile colonial subjects (more than a decade ago, an Indian Prime Minister dismissed it as a “third-rate power”) but till recently it had enough energy to punch above its weight and get away with it. Now it is too exhausted even to pretend that it is anything other than a “small island off the coast of Western Europe” as one academic put it.

It might have taken Britain a “long time to die,” in the words of Jeremy Greenstock, Britain’s former Ambassador to the United Nations. But finally the show — as we used to know it — seems to be drawing to a close.

Indeed, there is a growing view that Britain must now abandon its search for a post-Raj role and learn to live by the new world order in which those it once governed are the new masters. But, in refusing to read the writing on the wall, old colonial powers can be like ageing ballerinas who are often reluctant to acknowledge that their glory days are over and time has come for them to leave the stage before push comes to shove.

Thus, like the ageing ballerinas determined to go on and on, Britain’s hunt for a new “role” continues though, as Oxford academic Timothy Garton Ash noted recently, most people in Britain don’t even “notice there’s a hunt on anyway.”

“They are too busy watching their compatriots lose at football, or tennis or cricket. Role-hunting remains very much an elite sport: the polo of British politics,” Mr. Ash wrote in The Guardian in a swipe at the successive governments and policy wonks’ obsessive “role-hunting.”

There was, he said, a “persistent strand of self-delusion” in British policy elite’s claims about Britain’s role often “nicely punctured by memorable jibes” such as the former German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt’s remark that its much-touted relationship with America was so special that “only one side knows it exists.”

Defining or redefining Britain’s “vision” of its place in the world has become a default instinct of every new administration. Labour, when it came to power in 1997, declared that it wanted Britain to be a global force for good by pursuing an “ethical” foreign policy and through “liberal intervention” in resolving conflicts. Another of its big ticket policy resolves was to put Britain “in the heart of Europe” in the words of Tony Blair.

And what was Labour’s legacy when it left office 13 years later? A continuing civil war in Iraq and an open-ended insurgency in Afghanistan. As for Europe, far from Britain being anywhere near its “heart,” their relations took some heavy blows, mostly over Iraq, and also over Britain’s resistance to fuller integration with the European Union. Even the “special relationship” with America is no longer so special (that is, if it ever was except in the sense of London playing second fiddle to Washington) as the Obama administration focusses its energies on Asia and elsewhere.

So much so that it has become rather unfashionable to mention the “s” word. Mr. Cameron has, in fact, admitted that he sees Britain only as America’s “junior partner.” The Conservatives are trying to make a virtue out of necessity, saying they want to make foreign policy less America-centric and, instead, cultivate the emerging economies of Asia and Latin America. Foreign Secretary William Hague has been talking up his plans for a “distinctive British foreign policy” that would see it focus more on new centres of global power such as China, India, Brazil, Chile and the Gulf states.

“We’re getting on with that straight away. Many Ministers will be visiting India in the coming months to strongly signal to India that we want to elevate that entire relationship,” he said in a newspaper interview describing his plans as the biggest change to foreign policy for a generation.

The era of Britain seeing its every decision in terms of its effect on America and Europe was over, he declared arguing that London needed to be more pro-active in pursuing its foreign policy aims instead of always reacting to events. And he had Napoleon on his side, he said quoting the maxim that the side that stayed within its “fortifications” was beaten — and the country that was “just reactive” was in decline.

Impressive, though, the rhetoric is, it is hard not to see that there is more froth than substance in Mr. Hague’s brave assertions. In the absence of the nuts and bolts of his new policy, even a lay observer can see that the so-called “distinctive” policy is anything but “distinctive.” To portray the new focus on India and China as something “distinctive” for which they should perhaps be grateful to Britain is patronising nonsense. The fact is no country with a semblance of a coherent foreign policy and which does not wish to be isolated can afford to ignore these new, emerging powers.

And, by the way, the wooing of New Delhi and Beijing started much before Mr. Hague came on the scene. It was under the previous Labour administration that Britain established a “strategic partnership” with India — followed by a procession of ministerial and high-level business delegations of the sort Mr. Hague says would be heading for New Delhi soon. The problem is not that Mr. Hague is trying to pass off old wine in a new bottle but that he (and indeed the entire British establishment) believes that Britain’s foreign policy still matters to the rest of the world. Unfortunately, it doesn’t. This brings us back to the point that Britain’s ruling elite still suffers from a “persistent self-delusion” about the country’s role beyond its shores. They are yet to “get it” that much of the world no longer sees Britain as a great power and doesn’t share its perception of itself.

As Mr. Ash says: “Roles, like identities, are an amalgam of who or what you think you are and what other people take you for. I may be convinced that I’m the finest opera singer in the world, but if no one else thinks I am, then I’m not.”

This is something that is yet to sink into the British ruling psyche. Once it could buy influence abroad through generous financial handouts but the recent economic crisis has left the country so broke that it is no longer in a position even to do that. The Department for International Development is under growing pressure to review its commitments despite the government’s promise to protect overseas aid from the austerity measures forced on other departments. And with the Foreign Office facing deep spending cuts, the era of Britain’s high-profile diplomatic presence that reflected its status as a world power is over. Embassies and consulates in a number of countries are to be closed at a time when, more than ever before, Britain needs these symbols of power to be more visible.

So, what can Britain do? “The answer is stark: not much, given the state of our finances,” wrote Michael Binyon, columnist of The Times, after attending a Chatham House conference on foreign policy.

Meanwhile, as a once great imperial power slowly dies on its feet it can draw some comfort from a new study that ranks Britain as the best country for the dying with its vast network of hospices and end-of-life care homes. It has prompted some cheeky comments about the country’s own health — reminiscent of the jibes it suffered in the 1960s and 1970s when it was dubbed the “sick man of Europe.”





Gunmen kill anti-Taliban Pakistan minister’s son

24 07 2010

Gunmen kill anti-Taliban Pakistan minister’s son

AP

Officials say gunmen have killed the son of an anti—Taliban minister in northwest Pakistan.

Police official Nisar Khan says the Saturday shooting took place in Naushehra district, the hometown of Information Minister Mian Iftikhar Hussain of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.

Mr. Khan says the minister’s son was on a stroll when he was shot dead.

Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik blamed the attack on Taliban militants.

He said government ministers and their families had been on an insurgent hit list.

Mr. Hussain had always been highly critical of the Taliban.





US Continues To Agitate N. Korea With Lame Cheonan Claims Before Tomorrow’s War Games

24 07 2010

Doubts surface on North Korea’s role in ship sinking

Some in South Korea dispute the official version of events: that a North Korean torpedo ripped apart the Cheonan.

By Barbara Demick and John M. Glionna   Los Angeles Times
Reporting from Seoul —

The way U.S. officials see it, there’s little mystery behind the most notorious shipwreck in recent Korean history.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton calls the evidence “overwhelming” that the Cheonan, a South Korean warship that sank in March, was hit by a North Korean torpedo. Vice President Joe Biden has cited the South Korean-led panel investigating the sinking as a model of transparency.

But challenges to the official version of events are coming from an unlikely place: within South Korea.

Armed with dossiers of their own scientific studies and bolstered by conspiracy theories, critics dispute the findings announced May 20 by South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, which pointed a finger at Pyongyang.

They also question why Lee made the announcement nearly two months after the ship’s sinking, on the very day campaigning opened for fiercely contested local elections. Many accuse the conservative leader of using the deaths of 46 sailors to stir up anti-communist sentiment and sway the vote.

The critics, mostly but not all from the opposition, say it is unlikely that the impoverished North Korean regime could have pulled off a perfectly executed hit against a superior military power, sneaking a submarine into the area and slipping away without detection. They also wonder whether the evidence of a torpedo attack was misinterpreted, or even fabricated.

“I couldn’t find the slightest sign of an explosion,” said Shin Sang-chul, a former shipbuilding executive-turned-investigative journalist. “The sailors drowned to death. Their bodies were clean. We didn’t even find dead fish in the sea.”

Shin, who was appointed to the joint investigative panel by the opposition Democratic Party, inspected the damaged ship with other experts April 30. He was removed from the panel shortly afterward, he says, because he had voiced a contrary opinion: that the Cheonan hit ground in the shallow water off the Korean peninsula and then damaged its hull trying to get off a reef.

“It was the equivalent of a simple traffic accident at sea,” Shin said.

The Defense Ministry said in a statement that Shin was removed because of “limited expertise, a lack of objectivity and scientific logic,” and that he was “intentionally creating public mistrust” in the investigation.

The doubts about the Cheonan have embarrassed the United States, which will s begin joint military exercises Sunday in a show of unity against North Korean aggression. On Friday, an angry North Korea warned that “there will be a physical response” to the maneuvers.

Two South Korean-born U.S. academics have joined the chorus of skepticism, holding a news conference this month in Tokyo to voice their suspicions about the “smoking gun:” a piece of torpedo propeller with a handwritten mark in blue ink reading “No. 1″ in Korean.

“You could put that mark on an iPhone and claim it was manufactured in North Korea,” scoffed one of the academics, Seunghun Lee, a professor of physics at the University of Virginia.

Lee called the discovery of the propeller fragment five days before the government’s news conference suspicious. The salvaged part had more corrosion than would have been expected after just 50 days in the water, yet the blue writing was surprisingly clear, he said.

“The government is lying when they said this was found underwater. I think this is something that was pulled out of a warehouse of old materials to show to the press,” Lee said.

South Korean politicians say they’ve been left in the dark about the investigation.

“We asked for very basic information: interviews with surviving sailors, communication records, the reason the ship was out there,” said Choi Moon-soon, an assemblyman with the Democratic Party.

The legislature also has not been allowed to see the full report by the investigative committee, only a five-page synopsis.

“I don’t know why they haven’t released the report. They are trying to cover up small inconsistencies, and that has cost them credibility,” said Kim Chul-woo, a former Defense Ministry official who is now an analyst with the Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, a government think tank.

A military oversight body, the Board of Inspection and Audit, has accused senior naval officers of lying and concealing information.

“Military officers deliberately left out or distorted key information in their report to senior officials and the public because they wanted to avoid being held to account for being unprepared,” an official of the inspection board was quoted as telling the South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo.

The Cheonan, a 1,200-ton corvette, sank the night of March 26 about 12 miles off North Korea. The first report issued by Yonhap, the official South Korean news agency, said the ship had been struck by a torpedo, but soon afterward the story changed to say the ship sank after being grounded on a reef.

The military repeated that version for days. The audit board found that sailors on a nearby vessel, the Sokcho, who fired off 35 shots with a 76-millimeter cannon around the time of the sinking, were instructed to say they’d been shooting at a flock of birds, even though at first they had said they’d seen a suspected submarine on radar.

On April 2, as Defense Minister Kim Tae-young was testifying before the National Assembly, a cameraman shooting over his right shoulder managed to capture an image of a handwritten note from the president’s office instructing him not to talk about North Korean submarines.

Such inconsistencies and reversals have fueled the suspicions of government critics. U.S. officials, however, say the panel’s conclusion is irrefutable.

Rear Adm. Thomas J. Eccles, the senior U.S. representative on the panel, said investigators considered all possibilities: a grounding, an internal explosion, a collision with a mine. But they quickly concluded that the boat was sunk by a bubble-jet torpedo, which exploded underneath the vessel and didn’t leave the usual signs of an explosion, he said.

“The pattern of damage was exactly aligned with that kind of weapon,” Eccles said in a telephone interview. “Torpedoes these days are designed to drive underneath the target and explode. They use the energy of their explosion to make a bubble that expands and contracts. It is designed to break the back of the ship.”

Pyongyang, meanwhile, denies involvement in the sinking and calls the accusation against it a fabrication.

South Koreans themselves appear to be confused: Polls show that more than 20% of the public doesn’t believe North Korea sank the Cheonan.

Wi Sung-lac, South Korea’s top envoy for North Korean affairs, says the criticism from within has made it difficult to get China and Russia on board to punish Pyongyang for the attack.

“They say, ‘But even in your own country, many people don’t believe the result,’ ” Wi said.

barbara.demick@latimes.com

john.glionna@latimes.com

Ju-min Park of The Times’ Seoul Bureau and David S. Cloud of the Washington bureau contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2010, The Los Angeles Times





US directs “propaganda drama” against Iran with Russia help: Ahmadinejad

24 07 2010
US directs "propaganda drama" against Iran with Russia help: Ahmadinejad

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejadsaid the US has directed a new “propaganda drama” against Iran with the help of Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, ISNA reported.

“Enemies have waged psychological war against Iran and some of them have made coordination with some individuals inside Iran for military attack against the country with the help of a couple of regional countries, which are friend to Iran, and Zionists to undermine Iranian nation’s will as they imagine,” he said Friday night in the closing ceremony of national youth festival.

He added, “the propaganda drama kicked-started by Russian President’s speech among the country’s ambassadors where he said Iran will have got access to atomic bomb by next two years.”

Ahmadineajd continued, “Iranian and Russian nations are friends and we are interested in continuing friendship between the two countries, but the remark of Dmitry Medvedev kick-started the propaganda drama of the US against Iran.”

“Unfortunately, some who are uninformed or have wrong analysis are involved in the drama which is against their interests, the question is that why should Russian President play in the US drama?”

Iranian President warned, “the US and its allies cannot make Iran change its stances and they will take their wishes to grave.”

He also added Iran would send its first manned shuttle into space in 2019.

The locally-made shuttle will be guided by a domestic launch pad and control station.

“In response to the enemy’s resolutions, it was decided that the project be pushed forward by five years,” he added.





BP to begin deep-water drilling off coast of Libya, Reaping the Lockerbie Rewards

24 07 2010
BP to begin deep-water drilling off coast of Libya

BP will start deep-water drilling off the coast of Libya within weeks, a company spokesman said on Saturday, DPAreporetd.

“Drilling will begin in the next few weeks,” spokesman David Nicholas told the German Press Agency dpa, confirming a report in the Final Times.

The move comes despite concerns about BP’s safety and environmental record, following the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico after and oil rig that had been drilling a well for BP exploded in April.

BP purchased the rights to explore for oil in Libya’s Gulf of Sirte three years ago.

US authorities accuse BP of lobbying for the release of the Lockerbie bomber so it could begin drilling off Libya.

The bomber, Abdel Basset al-Megrahi, was set free last year from a prison in Scotland and returned to his native Libya.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 43 other followers