International Oil Companies and the Takeover of Central Asia

27 09 2010

“What is also significant is the ‘openness of Caspian-basin nations to investments from international oil companies,’ Cornell noted, saying that the cooperation between national oil companies and the international giants presented a new method of handling national oil wealth.”

Central Asian energy development welcomed by energy summit analysts

Jax Jacobsen

Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Research Director Svante Cornell was among the int’l energy experts who spoke at Thursday’s Washington Energy Summit

WASHINGTON, DC – Friday, September 24, 2010 – The emergence of Central Asia as a major oil and gas producer has been a welcome development in the realm of energy in the past twenty years, analysts said Thursday during the Washington Energy Summit in Washington, DC.

The development of energy reserves from nations located around the Caspian basin has been one of the most important changes in the last two decades, noted Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Research Director Svante Cornell.

It has allowed oil-consuming countries “to diversify their import sources” by increasing their choices of oil sellers, while simultaneously allowing producer nations, like Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, “to diversify their exports.”

“Central Asia can work further to diversify their [energy] exports if they have long-term plans,” he said.

Another benefit to the emergence of Central Asia on the global energy scene lies in its geography, Cornell noted.

“The Central Asian republics are located near energy consumers” like Russia and China, which makes the transportation of fuel to customers easier and allows Central Asian producers to export more, he added.

What is also significant is the “openness of Caspian-basin nations to investments from international oil companies,” Cornell noted, saying that the cooperation between national oil companies and the international giants presented a new method of handling national oil wealth.

The Caspian basin region also offers attractive conditions for international investors, said Heritage Foundation Senior Research Fellow Ariel Cohen.

“The rule of law and protection of assets is important” for international oil companies to consider, he said. In the Caspian region and Central Asia, “the political risk is low, even if it is geographically difficult” to extract the fuels.

The biggest question in the region is the future of resource development in Turkmenistan, analysts said.

The amount of gas resources in Turkmenistan have not been quantified for as long as other nations in the region and the country’s energy relations with regional gas giant, Russia, have been testy.

Russia’s Gazprom is reported to have spread rumors about the lack of quality of Turkmenistan’s reserves, Cornell said. Russia also shut off valves shortly before Turkmenistan built a gas pipeline that would provide China with 30-40 bcm of gas per year.

“Now, Turkmenistan is going to exclude Gazprom from the construction of its East-West pipeline,” Cornell said, adding that Turkmen president Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov recently excluded Russia from a list of potential gas customers that also included China, Europe and Iran.

Turkmenistan’s gas reserves are estimated to be 7 trillion cubic meters, the fifth-largest in the world.






Taliban Grab British Woman To Trade for Dr. Siddiqui

27 09 2010


Taliban demand prisoner swap for kidnapped British aid worker

Taliban militants are holding the British woman kidnapped in Afghanistan and want to exchange her for a female Pakistani scientist jailed last week in America, it has been reported.

By Ben Farmer, Kabul

A local Taliban commander named Mohammad Osman said he had kidnapped the woman and her Afghan colleagues in Kunar province on Sunday.

He told an Afghan press agency with close ties to the Taliban that he was demanding an exchange for Aafia Siddiqui.

Siddiqui, a 38-year-old neuroscientist, was jailed last week by a New York court for 86 years for the attempted murder of US agents and soldiers who were trying to interrogate her in Afghanistan.

Mohammad Osman told the Afghan Islamic Press (AIP), based in Peshawar in northeastern Pakistan: “We are lucky that we abducted this British woman soon after the ruthless ruling by an American court on Aafia Siddiqui

“We will demand the release of Aafia Siddiqui in exchange for her.”

British government policy is never to pay ransoms to kidnappers, but London and Washington are in contact over the report.

The AIP frequently carries interviews and statements from senior insurgent figures and is considered to be have close links to the Taliban.

The British embassy in Kabul would not discuss the credibility of the report or demand. A spokeswoman said: “We do not discuss operational details.”

The Foreign Office and the family of the kidnapped woman have asked the press not to name her. She was working for the aid contractor Development Alternatives Inc, on a project paid for by the American government.

She was kidnapped with three Afghan colleagues on Sunday morning as she drove in a two-car convoy from the provincial capital of Asadabad to Jalalabad.

Siddiqui’s sentence provoked anger in Pakistan, where thousands took to the streets demanding her release.

Yousaf Raza Gilani, the Pakistani prime minister, called on America to repatriate a “daughter of the nation” to improve its image in Pakistan.

The Taliban commander said Siddiqui was a sister to all Muslims.

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology-educated scientist and mother-of-three was convicted of opening fire on her interrogators after grabbing a weapon while she was in custody in Afghanistan in 2008.

Prosecutors said she had been arrested in Ghazni that year carrying details of prominent American monuments and bomb-making notes.

Her supporters contend she had been kept for years in a secret prison before her arrest and badly treated in custody.

Defence lawyers said her gun attack, in which she failed to hit any one, was a spontaneous “freak out,” born of mental illness.





American Air Attacks Within Pakistan, Whether by Drone or Piloted Ship, Spells Disaster

27 09 2010

English.news.cn 2010-09-27 00:08:30
ISLAMABAD, Sept. 26 (Xinhua) — At least nine people were killed and another two injured in three U.S. drone strikes launched on Sunday evening in Pakistan’s northwest tribal area of North Waziristan, reported local media.

According to the reports, the U.S. drones launched three strikes at different targets in Miranshah, North Waziristan, a place bordering Afghanistan, which is believed to be one of the strongholds of militants in Pakistan.

During the first strike, the U.S. drones fired three missiles at a house located at the Datta Khel Road in Miranshah, killing at least four people and injuring two others.

In the second strike, six to seven U.S. drones seen hovering over Miranshah fired five missiles at a target at the Tarmano Road in the area, killing at least three people.

In the third strike, the U.S. drones fired one missile at another target in the Miranshah, killing at least two people.

The third strike launched by U.S. drones on Sunday evening counts for the eighth of its kind over the past week. Starting from last Sunday, the U.S. drones have apparently stepped up its strike against the militants hiding in Pakistan’s northwest tribal areas of North Waziristan and South Waziristan. So far over 40 people including some important militant leaders have reportedly been killed in the strikes since last Sunday.

The so-called precision strikes of the U.S. drones against militants have also mistakenly killed many other innocent people. There are reports saying that the death ratio of militants killed against civilians in such strikes stands at about 1 against 25, leading to a strong anti-American sentiment in the country.

Local watchers believe that the repeated U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan, plus the recent sentencing of a Pakistani female scientist named Aafia Siddiqui to 86-year imprisonment by a US court over terrorism charges, could lead to another round of fierce terrorist attacks in the country.

On Saturday night three NATO oil tankers were attacked by Taliban in Pakistan and Pakistan Talibans have threatened to continue attacks on NATO convoys supplying goods to the US-led NATO troops in Afghanistan through the land route of Pakistan unless Aafia Siddiqui, a female Pakistani scientist recently sentenced to 86-year imprisonment by a US court, is released and returned to Pakistan.





NATO Forces Conduct Series of Airstrikes Inside Pakistan

27 09 2010

[Hell, th]ey may as well go in; Gen. Kayani has thrown the door wide open to his American bosses.

NATO forces carry out 2 airstrikes in Pakistan, killing more than 50 insurgents

By SEBASTIAN ABBOT , Associated Press

ISLAMABAD – NATO helicopters based in Afghanistan carried out at least two airstrikes in Pakistan that killed more than 50 militants after the insurgents attacked a small Afghan security outpost near the border, spokesmen said Monday.

NATO justified the strikes based on “the right of self-defense.” Pakistan is sensitive about attacks on its territory, but U.S. officials have said they have an agreement that allows aircraft to cross a few miles into Pakistani airspace if they are in hot pursuit of a target.

The first strike took place Saturday after insurgents based in Pakistan attacked an Afghan outpost in Khost province, which is located right across the border from Pakistan’s North Waziristan tribal area, said U.S. Capt. Ryan Donald, a spokesman for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan.

“The ISAF helicopters did cross into Pakistan territory to engage the insurgents,” said Donald. “ISAF maintains the right to self-defense, and that’s why they crossed the Pakistan border.”

The strike killed 49 militants, said U.S. Maj. Michael Johnson, another ISAF spokesman.

The second attack occurred when helicopters returned to the border area and were attacked by insurgents based in Pakistan, said Donald.

“The helicopters returned to the scene and they received direct small arms fire and, once again operating in self-defense, they engaged the insurgents,” said Donald.

The strike killed at least four militants, said Johnson.

The tribal area where the strikes took place is largely controlled by militants who regularly carry out attacks against NATO troops in Afghanistan. The U.S. rarely uses manned aircraft to carry out strikes in North Waziristan and instead relies on drone attacks that American officials refuse to acknowledge publicly.

Pakistani intelligence officials said two NATO helicopters carried out a third strike inside Pakistani territory on Monday morning, killing five militants and wounding nine others.

The strike occurred in the village of Mata Sanger in the Kurram tribal area, which is directly across the border from the Afghan provinces of Paktia and Nangarhar, said the officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media.

Donald, the NATO spokesman, said officials were still investigating and could not confirm or deny reports of the attack in Kurram.

The Pakistani military could not be reached to comment on the NATO attacks.





Foreign helicopter fires on Somali militants, narrowly misses leaders

27 09 2010

Foreign helicopter fires on Somali militants, narrowly misses leaders

The rockets struck a town controlled by Al-Shabab, which has aligned itself with Al-Qaida.

By MOHAMED IBRAHIM and JEFFREY GETTLEMAN , New York Times

MOGADISHU, SOMALIA – An unidentified military helicopter fired rockets at a house where Somali militants were meeting Sunday, residents and insurgent leaders said, in an apparent strike against Al-Shabab.

Residents in Merca, a seaside town firmly in Al-Shabab’s hands, said that a foreign military helicopter was flying low circles overhead Sunday morning before the attack. The residents said they saw the helicopter coming from the ocean but did not see any ships or know what country it belonged to. According to one Al-Shabab official, the helicopter’s rockets narrowly missed killing several leaders of the group.

Immediately after the attack, the group started blocking the roads in and outside the town and started investigations. They also seized cell phones from local reporters in an effort to ensure that the information did not go beyond Merca, according to residents.

The rockets hit “between two houses, and for God’s sake, no one has been killed or injured in the attack,” said the Al-Shabab official, who spoke from Merca on the condition of anonymity. “It was in fact a house where Al-Shabab officials were meeting.”

Last year, U.S. commandos killed Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan, a wanted agent of Al-Qaida, in a helicopter raid not far from Merca. That swath of southern Somalia is widely believed to be a sanctuary for several wanted terrorists and insurgent leaders, including Omar Hammami, an American militant originally from Alabama who has steadily risen up Al-Shabab’s ranks and become one of the organization’s top field commanders.

Al-Shabab, an Islamist group whose members have gained a reputation of ruthlessness for stoning adulterers and chopping off hands, controls much of Somalia and has drawn increasingly close to Al-Qaida in recent months.

At the same time, Somalia’s internationally recognized transitional federal government, which has received tens of millions of dollars in American aid, is struggling to control a few blocks of the capital, Mogadishu.





Russian Skinheads Attack Concert

27 09 2010





What is going on in Tajikistan? Sewing a pattern

27 09 2010

What is going on in Tajikistan? Sewing a pattern

By NewEurasia Tajikistan — Global Blogger
Published: September 26, 2010 22:00 ET in Europe
Photograph by Flickr user Catherine Hine (CC-usage).
Photograph by Flickr user Catherine Hine (CC-usage).

What is going in my country? Six Islamic militants, including a “foreign mercenary,” were killed during the anti-terror operation in the east of the country, the spokesmen of the Tajik Defense Ministry Faridun Mahmadaliev told journalists in Dushanbe yesterday. He confirmed that the special operation to”‘neutralize illegal armed groups in the Rasht Valley” is continuing.

According to authorities, these groups are responsible for a deadly ambush that killed 28 Tajik soldiers on September 19 in Kamarob. Initially, according to the authorities, the soldiers were sent to the region to hunt a group of prisoners who escaped jail in Dushanbe on August 23. However, local sources say the preparation for the operation was already under way long before the massive jailbreak. They also add that not one of the escaped prisoners are Rasht Valley natives, making the area an unlikely hideaway.

Another bit of suspicion was added when high profile government figures said the soldiers are seeking to eliminate Mullah Abdullah, a former opposition commander who did not accept the peace deal of 1997 and left the country for Afghanistan in 2000. Hunting Abdullah had also been the aim of the previous massive anti-terror operation conducted by the Tajik special forces last summer in Tavildara Valley. That mission did not succeed in capturing or killing Abdullah, but it did kill one-time Emergency Minister and former opposition field commander Mirzo Ziyoev under suspicious circumstances.

All this has led some independent newspapers in Dushanbe to dub Mullah Abdullah the “Tajik Bin Laden,” a vague phantom with the power to “appear” in other areas of the country and thus instigating new anti-terror operations resulting in more deaths problematic individuals. The authorities harshly criticized these papers, saying, “The independent papers are trying to demoralize our brave militaries, put in doubt our noble mission, and make our population hopeless.”

Yet, skepticism is a perfectly logical reaction to the situation, and here’s why.

A common thread between the two missions are the government figures behind them: Defense Minister Khairullah Sheraliev, Interior Affairs Minister Abdurahim Qahhorov, First Deputy of the Chief of the State Committee of National Security Mansurjon Umarov, and First Deputy of the Prosecutor General Abduqodir Muhammadiev. Incidentally, this entire group visited the region and met former opposition commanders Mirzokhuja Ahmadov and Shoh Iskandarov to solicit their help in finding Abdullah.

Ahmadov and Iskandarov accepted the peace deal of 1997 and worked in the Interior Ministry until 2008. Ahmadov became popular when the Special Unit of the Interior Ministry tried and failed to arrest him in February 2008. The commander of the unit, Oleg Zakharchenko, was killed during the event. Ahmadov told the public that he was innocent. He also claimed that the unit’s soldiers started firing upon his men, and in the ensuing skirmish, Zakharchenko was accidentally killed.

At the time, then Interior Minister General Mahmadnazar Solehov said he did not send the unit to arrest Ahmadov. Solehov was eventually compelled to resign, though, and then was killed in June 2009 when the government tried to arrest him. Officials said he killed himself, but the situation remains murky. According to some sources, he was considering joining the political opposition to overthrow President Rahmon.

Meanwhile, Ahmadov succeeded in convincing Rahmon that he was not connected to Solehov and was subsequently pardoned during a presidential visit to the region, which included a personal meeting between the two men, in October 2009. Because it was an oral pardon and not a formal documented decree, Ahmadov was anxious about his safety. When the criminal investigation into Zakharchenko’s death was re-opened in April 2010, he made a public appeal to Rahmon to stay true to the pardon.

By the way, it is during this visit that local sources say the first soldiers arrived, about 250 of them. Hmmmm the way the needle is sewing this thread, it seems to me that both missions, as well as the meeting with Ahmadov and Iskandarov, needed Rahmon’s green light. Ahmadov’s connection to Abdullah cannot be reassuring for the former.

Normally I hesitate to speculate, but my needle is sewing a pattern that makes me wonder whether Abdullah is even alive, much less in the country. Whatever the truth, the authorities are indeed using his name to launch suspicious operations against individuals who would have the capacity to lead an uprising against the government.

By “uprising” I generally mean social unrest, which actually could be ignited in any part of the country, but which is most likely to arise from the Rasht Valley. If it does happen there, then it could evolve into outright revolt against the government. Keep in mind that this area was a stronghold of the opposition during the civil war, and that its inhabitants, the Gharmi, were against the Kulobi clan — the clan of Rahmon.

I hope I’m wrong, but Tajikistan’s carpet is unraveling at the seams. Prices continue to rise, the Roghun project is deflating our currency and enraging our neighbors, the government is impotent, and worst of all, the winter is coming…

Tags





when it is issued it will lead to chaos in Lebanon

26 09 2010

Jumblatt: We Got Tribunal But I Wish We Didn’t, Truth behind False Witnesses

Readers Number : 90

26/09/2010 Democratic Gathering bloc l MP Walid Jumblatt said that it would have been better if the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL) had never existed, adding that the best way to achieve justice is to reveal the truth behind the false witnesses.

“We got the tribunal, but I wish we did not,” Jumblatt said during a ceremony to honor Russian Ambassador to Lebanon Sergei Poukine.
“The aim of [UN Security Council] Resolution 1559 and the 2006 July War was to disarm the Resistance. When this failed, they resorted to [attempting to use] the STL’s indictment [to carry out this goal],” he said.

“The best way to achieve justice in the [2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri] is to reveal the truth behind the witnesses who gave false testimony to the international commission investigating into the murder,” Jumblatt added.

He also said that the tribunal’s pending indictment will destabilize Lebanon when it is issued and will lead to chaos.





How Russia Is Rebuilding Influence In The Former Soviet Bloc

26 09 2010

Czech Power Games: How Russia Is Rebuilding Influence In The Former Soviet Bloc

Russia's LUKoil has serious pull in the Czech Republic, and has cultivated ties with many leading politicians.Russia’s LUKoil has serious pull in the Czech Republic, and has cultivated ties with many leading politicians.

September 25, 2010
By Gregory Feifer, Brian Whitmore
One man’s signature was all it would take to end eight years of tortuous negotiations and contentious national referenda. That effort had finally yielded the Lisbon Treaty, a new agreement among members of the European Union that would provide the community with its first constitution and president. The final hurdle was securing that one politician’s signature, but European leaders were growing frantic last October because he wasn’t answering his telephone.

Instead Vaclav Klaus, the Czech president, had embarked on an international tour to promote his new book, “Blue Planet in Green Shackles,” an anti-global-warming manifesto in which Klaus — who has denounced Al Gore as an “apostle of arrogance” — dismisses manmade climate change as a myth.

Klaus’s main destination was Moscow, where LUKoil, the giant Russian oil company, was paying for the book’s translation. Speaking in the Kremlin, the Czech leader, his white hair closely cropped and mustache fastidiously trimmed, condemned the EU — which he once compared to the Soviet Union — as elitist and undemocratic.

It was an extraordinary state of affairs: a tiny new EU member impeding, if not quite derailing, a historic community development. Klaus eventually signed the Lisbon Treaty, but only after his protracted opposition had frayed the EU’s already fragile unity. Critics of Europe’s rudest politician, as he’s been described, accused him of hijacking the treaty in order to steal the limelight.

Although most Czechs say their president genuinely believes in his anti-European tirades, many were dismayed. But Klaus’s trip to Moscow raised eyebrows for another reason: to many observers, he appeared to be acting in the interests of the Kremlin, and not for the first time.

In the 1990s, Klaus promoted Czech oil and gas agreements with Russia before opposing a deal to buy gas from Norway as “economically unviable.” (When Moscow cut off supplies flowing through Ukraine in 2006 and 2009, the deal helped enable the Czech Republic to avoid major energy crises.) In 1999, he joined the Kremlin’s angry condemnation of NATO’s bombing of Yugoslavia over Kosovo. A decade later as president, he appeared to back Russia’s invasion of Georgia by declaring that the responsibility of Moscow’s former Soviet neighbor was “unexceptionable and fatal.”

Czech President Vaclav Klaus (right) is seen as moving ever closer to Russia and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin.

A trained economist, Klaus has served as prime minister or president during most of the Czech Republic’s postcommunist history. The staunch free-marketeer — who keeps a photograph of Margaret Thatcher prominently displayed in his office — oversaw the transition of a centrally planned economy into one of the former Soviet bloc’s most successful markets before emerging as a leading voice of the country’s right wing. So you’d be forgiven for thinking it somewhat of a paradox that he’s come out on Moscow’s side on almost every major issue.

Klaus’s resistance to signing the Lisbon Treaty, despite being obligated to do so by Czech law, put him in step with the Kremlin yet again, this time over one of Moscow’s biggest foreign-policy goals: splitting European unity. Klaus has backed Moscow so consistently over the years that jokes in Prague about his being a Russian agent prompt chuckles tinged with more than a little nervousness.

Journalist Jaroslav Plesl, who has investigated Russian influence in the Czech Republic, believes it doesn’t matter whether the gossip contains any truth. “You don’t need to see any documents, even if they exist,” he says. “The Russians want the European Union to be as weak as possible, and for that purpose, Klaus serves their interests well.”

But there are worries that Klaus, who refused requests for an interview, is just the tip of the iceberg. A growing number of Czech politicians across the spectrum appear to have ties to Russia in one or another form, and it’s setting off alarm bells. Twenty years after the end of communism — and four decades after the Red Army crushed the Prague Spring in 1968 — a few lonely voices are warning that the Czech Republic and its neighbors are in danger of falling under Moscow’s influence once again. This time, they say, the threat isn’t from Russia’s tanks but the one business in which Russia leads the world: energy.

That was the message from a group of prominent Central and Eastern European politicians led by former President Vaclav Havel, Klaus’s predecessor and nemesis, who published an open letter to President Barack Obama last summer. The West, they wrote, should abandon its mistaken belief that the end of the Cold War and the expansion of the EU and NATO into the former Soviet bloc guaranteed their countries were “safe.”

Criticism that Washington may be abandoning allies in Central and Eastern Europe in favor of “resetting” relations with Moscow is growing ever louder. But some believe it’s distracting from the real threat in this part of the world. A handful of politicians, journalists, and former intelligence officers say rampant corruption is making Czechs vulnerable to exploitation by a resurgent Russia with ready cash to help fulfill its burning desire to reestablish its influence over former Soviet bloc countries.

Unlike Western firms, which lobby largely in their own interests, Russian state-controlled and private enterprises play an integral role in Kremlin foreign policy, and they’re “undoubtedly influencing the behavior of various Czech political parties and politicians,” Havel said in an interview. “I’ve seen several cases where the influence started quietly and slowly began projecting onto our foreign policy. I can only advise serious discretion and great caution.”

As one objective in a grand strategy, the Czech Republic sheds light on just how Moscow works. It’s no secret Russia is the world’s biggest exporter of oil and gas, especially to Central and Eastern European countries, some of which depend on Russia for around 90 percent of their supplies. But in the Czech Republic, Moscow is playing for an industry that’s been promoted as central to securing the country’s energy independence: nuclear power. A Russian company is bidding for the biggest nuclear energy deal in history, and many believe it will win.

WATCH: Russians in Karlovy Vary

Spy Game

Klaus’s offices are in Prague’s storied castle, a dark medieval hulk that looms over a Baroque city of spires. Despite its architectural charms, however, outside the center, much of Prague remains gritty, a city still emerging from its communist past. But some neighborhoods stand out. Near the castle hill above the curving Vltava River, a collection of villas lines the leafy streets of one of Prague’s toniest quarters. It’s here that many of the city’s wealthy Russians have settled.

To those Russians, Prague is a more affordable version of London: an urban asylum that’s safer and more civilized than teeming, lawless Moscow, and a convenient few hours’ flight away. Russian law firms, food stores and hairdressers serve not only the rich, but a growing number of their middle-class compatriots. The neighborhood is also home to the Russian Embassy, which occupies a sprawling palace and includes a Russian Orthodox church, and, according to Czech intelligence, provides a place for at least 60 Russian intelligence officers and agents, or a third of the Russian diplomatic community, from which to operate.

Last year, the government expelled two Russian diplomats suspected of spying. Many Czechs believe they’d taken part in a large-scale Russian effort to rally public opinion against the construction of a radar base that was to be part of the U.S. missile defense shield. But Czech media later reported the Russians were probably conducting industrial espionage. In a report issued in June, the Czech counterintelligence service warned that Russian espionage was “aggressive” and escalating, especially in the energy business.

That development worries Karel Randak, the soft-spoken former head of the Czech intelligence service whose close-cropped salt-and-pepper hair gives him the appearance more of a scholar than spy. But espionage is only part of the way Moscow is seeking to expand its influence here. Although Randak insists most Russian businessmen behave no differently from their Western counterparts, he says some of the biggest Russian companies operate by stealth, through a dizzying web of shell companies nominally owned and operated by Czechs but actually controlled by Moscow.

Among them, a gas-trading company named Vemex has taken 12 percent of the Czech domestic market since its establishment in 2001 to sell Russian natural gas. Although there’s nothing on Vemex’s website to indicate it, the company is Czech in name only. It’s actually controlled by Gazprom through a series of companies based in Switzerland, Germany, and Austria, including Centrex Europe Energy and Gas, which has helped spearhead the Russian drive to buy energy assets across Europe.

Centrex is registered in Austria, and, according to Gazprom’s website, founded by its own Gazprombank. But the company’s real ownership is impossible to trace. According to the European Commission, Centrex is owned by Centrex Group Holding Ltd., registered in Cyprus, a company controlled by Gazprom’s German subsidiary, and RN Privatsiftung, a Vienna foundation whose stockholders are unknown.

Why go to the trouble of hiding the real owners of companies either already known or believed to be controlled by Gazprom? Vemex is just one of a large number of enterprises Gazprom has set up in countries across Central and Eastern Europe to muscle into the European energy-utilities business. By disguising the real owners, Gazprom makes its actions more palatable to Europeans wary of expanding Russian influence.

Randak, who began his intelligence career tracking Russian criminal groups in the 1990s, says the Russians first gained control over organized crime in the Czech Republic from the Italian Mafia around 1992. Beginning with “normal criminal activities,” mainly racketeering, they branched into white-collar crime in the mid-1990s. “They hired lawyers and established local companies with Czech board members,” Randak says. “Now they’re involved in ‘real business’ because they have real money.” And they’re controlled by, or work with, the Russian government. “This is the real danger coming from Russia.”

The character Victor Laszlo, the fugitive Czech resistance leader in the film “Casablanca,” may represent the most common image of the country in the West: rigid, pure, and dedicated, fighting against the victimization of a foreign oppressor. As always, the reality is more complicated. Journalist Jaroslav Plesl, who’s one of the country’s leading political commentators, blames his own countrymen for their scant concern about the danger from Moscow. “They’re willing to sell anything,” he says. “If you want to influence politics here, you need to do business with only a very few people, and you can pretty much control the country.”

“That’s something the Russians have been able to exploit,” Plesl says. “Just look at Karlovy Vary.”

Nowhere is the Russian presence more visible than in the storied spa town in the hilly west of the country that’s a popular vacation destination for Russians. Many of the town’s buildings belong to Russians, including the grand Imperial Hotel, owned by a Russian-born businessman who got his start in the region overseeing Soviet uranium mining in the 1970s and where Klaus often stays. “Russians can do whatever they want without permission,” Plesl says, “and if they do need approval for something, they’ll bribe city hall to get it.” During a low ebb in relations, Czechs joked the Kremlin once warned it would bomb Prague if the government wasn’t careful. “If you’re not careful,” the Czech prime minister replied, “we’ll bomb Karlovy Vary.”

Lobbying Efforts

With some 50 of its filling stations dotting the countryside, LUKoil is Russia’s most public face in the Czech Republic. Last year, the company also secured a contract to supply 20 percent of the jet fuel used at Prague’s International Airport. No other companies bid for the deal, despite a pledge by then-Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek — a bitter opponent of Klaus’s who’s raised serious concerns about the danger of Russian control over Czech strategic companies — to diversify his country’s energy supplies.

That may be because LUKoil has serious pull. According to the Czech media, the company’s CEO Vagit Alekperov — who enjoys close ties to Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin — twice secretly met Klaus in the Prague Castle. One of the meetings is reported to have taken place in November 2008, around the time LUKoil announced it would expand its business in the Czech Republic, prompting rumors of a backroom deal. When asked by journalists about the meetings, Klaus reacted angrily, but didn’t deny they took place.

LUKoil’s Vagit Alekperov

The government’s decision to award the contract to LUKoil helped reverse a drive to free the country from dependence on Russian oil, the only source until a pipeline from Germany began delivering supplies in 1995 — against Klaus’s wishes. That channel now provides some 20 percent of the country’s oil, but according to Jaroslav Spurny — one of the country’s most prominent investigative journalists, who writes for the magazine “Respekt” — LUKoil now wants to take control of the pipeline and reverse the flow so that Russian supplies would be sent west through the Czech Republic. “That would make us fully dependent on Russian oil again,” Spurny says, “which would mean a kind of dictatorship.”

LUKoil and other Russian companies contacted for this article declined to provide interviews. But Russian Chamber of Commerce representative Sergei Mikoyan says LUKoil, like any company, is naturally seeking to expand its business for its own interests. “Why should Russia excuse itself for having enough money to buy property abroad?” he asks, adding that charges of a grand Kremlin plan to snap up European energy assets can be made only by people who “simply don’t like Russia. No matter what Russia does, they’ll always find skeletons in the closet.”

Mikoyan says the Czech government can easily rule any company operating in the country off-limits on the grounds of strategic importance, otherwise “say openly they’re for sale, but not to the Russians, which would be unfair and not part of free enterprise.”

Whatever its motives, LUKoil is cultivating ties with a number of politicians in addition to Klaus. Among them is a popular former prime minister named Milos Zeman, who recently left the Social Democratic Party to start his own left-wing Citizens’ Rights Party. While denying allegations that it is financed by LUKoil, the party admits taking money from Russian-connected lobbyists. Chief among them is Miroslav Slouf, a former communist youth leader whose Slavia Consulting company brokered the LUKoil deal to supply Prague’s airport. Slouf, who is known to be LUKoil’s main promoter in the Czech Republic, also happens to be Zeman’s right-hand man.

Zeman denies he benefits from Russian money. At his party headquarters in central Prague, the blunt, hard-drinking, old-school pol — who many believe hopes to succeed Klaus as president in 2013 — bridled in response to a question about the influence of lobbyists such as Slouf. “Let me give you a lesson in political science,” he says. “They’re engaged in a respectable job.” Besides, “we haven’t received a single penny from LUKoil.”

Members of the country’s small circle of pro-American politicians disagree, among them Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg, a pipe-smoking Hapsburg prince. “There are very strong lobbying groups here, very strong,” he said in an interview shortly before he joined the cabinet in July. “A lot of Russian firms are under the influence of the state, especially in the energy sector. And Russia is increasingly turning into an authoritarian state. There’s always a danger that economic influence turns into political influence.”

Former Green Party leader Martin Bursik, who also served as environment minister, is one of the loudest critics of the central role lobbyists play in Czech politics. He says it’s opened the door for Moscow to reassert its influence by reactivating a network of communist-era officials. “The kind of transparent, legal lobbying conducted by the U.S. president or secretary of state can hardly compete,” he says.

That’s being made clear by jockeying over the nuclear energy deal some believe is so important it will influence the country’s future development.

The CEZ Republic

In the region of South Bohemia, an hour south of Prague by car, picturesque but rundown villages dot miles of flat, bucolic farmland. Until you approach the village of Temelin, where four surreal-looking cooling towers loom over the land. They’re part of a nuclear power plant soon to become the focus of the biggest business deal in Czech history. The state power conglomerate that owns the plant, CEZ (pronounced “chess”), plans to build two new reactors, and possibly more elsewhere.

Started in the 1980s, construction on the Temelin plant was interrupted by the fall of communism. Westinghouse later completed the project, but last year CEZ discharged the U.S.-based company as supplier of nuclear fuel in favor of a Russian state-controlled firm.

Temelin and a second, larger nuclear power plant currently produce a third of Czech electricity. Although coal provides the biggest share of Czech energy, about 60 percent, the government plans to shut down the oldest, most polluting plants over the next decade. Temelin’s new reactors are expected to make up the difference, about 10 percent of the country’s energy.

Critics are worried about how the expansion plans will be handled, partly because CEZ isn’t just any power company. It’s the largest utility and biggest public company in Central and Eastern Europe, with a net profit last year five times that of the four biggest Czech banks combined. CEZ finances the two largest political parties and is so central to politics and business, one observer calls the Czech Republic an “electrostate.” Others have dubbed it the “CEZ Republic.”

CEZ, which is 70 percent state-owned, also illustrates the deep murkiness of Czech politics. In May, the Green Party publicly called on the company to reveal its ownership structure, alleging the firm stands at the center of “a network of loyalties and linkages in a nontransparent environment. That network includes courts, police, prosecutors, regional governments, and political parties.” The Greens are concerned that internal CEZ corruption will affect the outcome of the Temelin tender.

A spokesman for the Temelin plant says the new reactors will be key to maintaining the country’s “energy independence.” But given that rationale, it may come as a surprise that a Russian state-controlled company, Atomstroieksport, is not only among just three bidders, but by many accounts ranks at the top of the list. Competing against Atomstroieksport are Westinghouse (the U.S. company was bought by Japan’s Toshiba in 2007) and France’s Areva. The firms will submit their offers this fall. The contract, worth between $15 billion and $30 billion, will be awarded next year, and the new reactors are expected to begin operation by 2020.

CEZ says all three bidders are well qualified, and that the main consideration should be price. Others say the deal isn’t about money. “It’s a civilization choice,” says Vaclav Bartuska, the Czech Republic’s foreign envoy for energy-security issues. “I want my country to be tied to France or the U.S.,” he explains. “I’m not lobbying for Areva or Westinghouse, just against the Russians.”

When CEZ announced the Temelin tender last year, the government said it was up to the company to decide who wins. But Bartuska succeeded in a single-handed campaign to make the choice political: now the government will have the final say. It’s been a lonely battle. Bartuska, a dissident student leader under communism, is the only high-ranking government official to warn about the threat from Russian influence, for which he was criticized by even his own government for being “too pro-Western.”

‘Exporting Corruption’

The smiling former journalist — who spoke in his airy office in a sprawling 17th-century palace that houses the Foreign Ministry — says the difference between Russian and Western companies is the code by which they function. “Russian companies export corruption,” he says.

Czech energy-security envoy Vaclav Bartuska

Bartuska points to a deal last year to build a new storage facility at Temelin for spent nuclear fuel. The sole bid submitted for the $80 million contract was from a company so shady that it’s under investigation by the government. CEEI is believed to be Russian-controlled, but its ownership remains unknown. The trail stops at a Liechtenstein-based firm called U.B.I.E., where former Liechtenstein Prime Minister Markus Buechel is a director. He’s also Russia’s honorary consul to Liechtenstein.

Buechel has said even he doesn’t know who ultimately owns CEEI. According to a Prague-based business newsletter called the “Fleet Sheet,” however, he’s asked what would be wrong if the owner did turn out to be Russian. The newsletter also reported CEEI board member Vladimir Hlavinka, a CEZ executive, as dismissing concerns over CEEI. The country’s public-procurement law bars investigating bidders’ ownership, he said, because that would amount to “discrimination.”

Critics of the CEEI deal say Germany recently built an almost identical storage facility for half the price. “Fleet Sheet’s” American publisher, Erik Best, characterizes CEZ’s actions as evidence of what he calls the “privatization of state authority,” when state companies make decisions in the interests of their own executives instead of the state. Best says public projects in the Czech Republic are usually overpriced, undertaken less for the sake of improving infrastructure than the sums officials are able to skim from the contracts. He questions why Temelin’s new storage facility was commissioned.

“Was the real reason simply that they could build it, because that’s 1.5 or 2 billion crowns [$70 million or $100 million]? That means someone got 1.5 or 2 billion crowns, and of course there are the rumors [CEEI] is ultimately owned by Russians,” Best says.

Temelin’s spokesman has denied allegations of wrongdoing, saying the storage facility was necessary and long-planned. But energy envoy Bartuska agrees the questions surrounding CEEI are cause for serious concern about how CEZ will handle the upcoming reactor tender. Not least because one of CEEI’s directors is in jail for trying to kidnap another, who happens to be Klaus’s former chief of staff, in an alleged extortion attempt. Bartuska says that reminds him of incidents in countries such as Nigeria and “not how I want to see my own country.”

WATCH: The Temelin nuclear power plant — a key battleground in energy security

Nuclear Politics

Bartuska believes the decision over the Temelin tender will affect much more than the nuclear industry alone. “Putin will be bidding not just for two reactors,” he says, “but for [influence over] the entire Czech Republic.” Jiri Kominek, an analyst who writes for the Jamestown Foundation, says Moscow is already putting “unprecedented” lobbying pressure on the Czech government, and expects it to be successful.

Some opinion makers, including the editorial board of the “Hospodarske noviny” business newspaper — where Plesl is a columnist — are calling for banning Atomstroieksport from even participating in the tender. But that proposal is facing an uphill battle not least because the Russian company is expected to submit the lowest offer by far.

Sergei Mikoyan of the Russian Chamber of Commerce dismisses the criticism that the state-controlled company would pose a threat to Czech national security. “On the contrary,” he says, “the state’s backing of Atomstroieksport is good because the Russian government can guarantee the project’s security.”

For its part, Atomstroieksport has played down its connection to the Russian state, publicizing its bid by promising to subcontract up to 70 percent of the construction work on Temelin to Czech companies. The main beneficiary would be a nuclear-engineering firm called Skoda JS (separate from the eponymous car company, which is owned by Volkswagen). Last year, Atomstroieksport and Skoda JS formed a consortium to enter a joint bid, something Skoda JS director Miroslav Fiala says shows it’s “not really a Russian offer, but from a consortium led by Skoda JS.”

But there’s a catch. Although Skoda JS’s Czech managers may represent its public face, the company is really Russian-owned, after its recent sale to the state-controlled industrial conglomerate OMZ. Pressed on that point, Fiala admits the Skoda JS-Atomstroieksport bid actually “represents Russian national capital.” But he adds, “we’re simply offering CEZ a competitive and safe project that will open great opportunities for Czech industry.”

“Fleet Sheet” publisher Best isn’t convinced. “Skoda JS’s sale to OMZ is a much bigger matter than anyone is willing to admit,” he says. For one thing, the Czech company’s ownership of the plant’s designs “gives the Russians access to Westinghouse’s commercial secrets.”

“They’ve just been simply better prepared than the French or the Americans,” Best says of the Russians. “They’ve been more active coming in and setting up agreements with local suppliers. In that sense, they’ve done a better job than the Americans.”

Did U.S. Vice President Joe Biden do enough lobbying in Prague?

Vice President Joe Biden lobbied for Westinghouse’s bid when he visited Prague last winter. But Defense Minister Alexandr Vondra, who’s among the most pro-American members of the political establishment, criticizes Washington for doing too little. In an interview before his recent appointment to the government, he rejected concerns the Temelin bid would automatically go the Russians, but “a more energetic approach [from Westinghouse] would certainly be appreciated.”

Not A Done Deal

When Gazprom cut off gas supplies to Ukraine in 2006 in what looked very much like punishment for Kyiv’s pro-Western policies, there was little doubt Moscow was using energy as a foreign-policy tool. European countries, whose supplies were also disrupted, vowed to diversify their supplies by looking to other sources and developing renewable energy. But Europe still depends on Russia for a quarter of its gas, and that figure is only set to grow.

Those who believe Russian companies act differently than their Western counterparts see patterns in the Kremlin’s drive to broaden control over Europe’s energy infrastructure. Moscow’s success in the past several years has been dramatic. Germany, Italy, and Hungary are among the countries to have joined projects to build two major new gas pipelines from Russia that would deepen Europe’s dependence on Moscow. Earlier this year, Austria became the seventh country to sign on to Moscow’s South Stream pipeline, which is planned to deliver supplies from Central Asia.

Some believe Washington has fallen asleep at the wheel. “The U.S. never expected the Russian offensive would be so strong,” Plesl says. But he sees signs the United States has started mapping the “damage” caused by the Russians, and “I think they’re horrified.”

The U.S. Embassy in Prague and officials in Washington turned down requests for interviews. Some say it’s ironic that a U.S. administration undertaking a historic drive to institute regulations at home isn’t doing more to criticize the breakdown of rule of law among allies like the Czech Republic. “I don’t think they care a bloody damn about us,” Schwarzenberg, now foreign minister, said last spring. “We’re just a very small country somewhere in Central Europe. Why should they care?”

Following parliamentary elections in May, Schwarzenberg’s TOP 09 party joined a new center-right coalition government that will decide the Temelin tender next year. The new government is led by the Civic Democratic Party (ODS), which has called for lessening dependence on Russia and fighting corruption, a top issue for many who support the new government. But Karel Randak, the former intelligence chief, says he’s not optimistic because the previous center-right government — also led by the ODS until it collapsed last year — oversaw a rise in corruption.

Questioned about the advantages corruption gives Moscow, Czech politicians routinely say EU membership guarantees their country independence. “I don’t think ordinary investments from Russia, the United States, Italy, China, Japan, Brazil, Germany, France, or anywhere else are a threat to our national independence,” says Jiri Paroubek, a former prime minister and Social Democrat leader who was seen as especially sympathetic to Moscow.

But critics such as former Green Party leader Bursik warn that Moscow’s activities in the Czech Republic have shown that any belief that membership in international organizations such as the EU is enough to ensure the rule of law is naive. Moreover, the actions of Klaus — who founded the ODS — like those of other Czech leaders, have contributed decisively to the EU’s failure to mount a unified defense of its collective interests. That’s essentially enabled Russia to dictate the rules of the energy game by making deals with individual countries’ energy companies. “It’s still a power game over who has influence within the Czech Republic,” Bursik says. “It’s still a battle between NATO and Russia.”

Although President Klaus has no formal say over Temelin’s future, he’s endorsed Atomstroieksport’s bid. Klaus’s critics contend that’s part and parcel of his support for Moscow’s position on virtually every foreign-policy issue. But energy envoy Bartuska doesn’t believe Klaus is actually working for the Russians. “He loves to be alone against the flow, on climate change and many other things,” he says. It’s no secret that Klaus’s recalcitrance is something Moscow has exploited.

Bartuska, who’s met Putin and Medvedev in the Kremlin, also says he knows how seductive a grand Kremlin reception can be. “When they give you the treatment, oh my! Suddenly you feel you’re someone. Klaus can’t even get a meeting in Washington. Where would you go?” Still, the real threat to Czechs, Bartuska says, doesn’t come from Moscow “but from ourselves.” The Czech Republic made a “huge leap” toward the West after 1989, he says, but “suddenly became dissatisfied, started looking around and saying, ‘So this is it?’”

Still, Bartuska says the game isn’t up yet. Although he lost the fight to exclude Atomstroieksport from the Temelin tender, last June the government appointed him to oversee the process, a sign he says “speaks for itself.”

“Now we’re on a threshold. Either we can go the way of Ukraine, a phony democracy with a few people who are rich. Or we can go back and try to be a normal boring European country in which law is law.”

“But it’s not a done deal,” he adds. “We have to decide for ourselves what kind of country we want to live in.”





Tajik Special Services Claim Foreign Militant Killed In Eastern Operation

26 09 2010

Tajik special services kill another suspected militant week after deadly ambush

Tajik servicemen. Files
04:26 26/09/2010
© RIA Novosti.

A “foreign mercenary,” who reportedly took part in a deadly ambush on Tajik troops a week ago, has been killed in an ongoing special operation in eastern Tajikistan, the republic’s state TV reported.

According to the TV report, the suspected militant was in possession of an assault rifle, as well as plans of future terrorist attacks and a bomb-making manual.

The militant’s name and country of origin was not disclosed for investigation purposes. It was earlier reported that mercenaries from Pakistan and Afghanistan took part in the attack, which left some two dozens of servicemen dead.

According to official reports, 25 people were killed and 14 seriously injured on September 19 when they were ambushed in a remote Tajik valley. Three people later succumbed to their injuries, and 11 remain in hospital.

The operation against militant leaders Abdullo Rakhimov, Mirzokhudzha Akhmadov and Alovuddin Davlatov, who are blamed for the attack, began in eastern Tajikistan on Wednesday. Eight suspected militants have been killed so far.

DUSHANBE, September 26 (RIA Novosti)





Iran blames ‘terrorist attack’ on Kurdish separatists

26 09 2010

Iran blames ‘terrorist attack’ on Kurdish separatists

A bombing in Iran Wednesday at a military parade left at least 10 people dead. Iranian officials have accused Kurdish separatists, who it says are backed by the US, for carrying out the ‘terrorist attack.’

Debris litter the street after a bomb blast in Mahabad, Iran, in this image taken from TV, Sept 22.

Al Alam via APTN/AP

By Tom A. Peter,

Tensions in Iran’s restive Kurdish region are likely to escalate after a bombing there Wednesday left at least 10 people dead and dozens wounded. No one has claimed responsibility yet, but officials are calling it a “terrorist attack.” At least one Iranian leader has implied that Kurdish separatists may have been involved, but no official charges have been made.

The bomb detonated in the city of Mahabad during a military parade to showcase the nation’s might. The event was part of Iran’s Sacred Defense Week, a commemoration of the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq War, and according to Iran’s state media, the blast killed mostly women and children, including a 5-year-old child and the wives of two Iranian military commanders. The bomb was reportedly hidden in a tree near the seating area for high-ranking military officials.

The provincial governor, Vahid Jalalzadeh blamed the attack on “counter-revolutionaries,” a reference to Kurdish separatist groups such as the Iranian wing of the Turkey-based Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). In a report by Press TV he added that these groups “have always carried out such brutal acts to take revenge on the people of Mahabad….”

There has been a long-running conflict between Iranian forces and Kurdish guerrillas in the area who conduct regular attacks inside Iran and Turkey. Lately reports have emerged that in recent months Iranian authorities have arrested, tried, and executed Kurdish activists in the area, reports the BBC.

Iran: Attackers backed by US

Iranians have accused the US of backing the Iranian PKK, called the Party for the Free Life of Kurdistan (PEJAK). Following Wednesday’s attack, officials were quick to blame the US, although they did not officially implicate PEJAK.

“As the investigations indicate, the attack has foreign backing. … Unfortunately, the Americans and their allies are in the region. From the first day of their presence and their slogan to establish security in the region, we can see that the unrest has increased,” said Mr. Jalalzadeh in an article by the Los Angeles Times.

Iranians have often accused the US, Britain, and other Western countries, of meddling in their internal affairs and provoking violent episodes. Most recently, Iran accused the West of inciting the unrest that followed the disputed reelection of Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009, reports the Associated Press.

A key city for Kurds

The city of Mahabad where the bombing took place is central to Kurds not only in Iran, but to all those spread across Iraq, Turkey, and Syria as well. The largest ethnic group without a country, Kurds have long struggled for autonomy. With Soviet backing in 1946, the Kurd’s established the Kurdish Republic of Mahabad, but Iran reclaimed the territory by 1947.

In addition to PEJAK, there are also several other militant groups in Iran who oppose the government and could have been involved in the attack.

The most active insurgent group in Iran is the Sunni Muslim Jundollah Baluch, which Iranian authorities say has ties to Al Qaeda. In July, the group claimed responsibility for a double suicide bombing that killed 28 people. The group’s leaders said the attack was revenge for the execution of its leaders, reports Reuters.





The Secret War Against Iran–ABC News

26 09 2010





Terrorists Threaten Televised Live Hostage-Taking At Commonwealth Games

26 09 2010

Al Qaeda plot to kidnap British athletes, fans during Delhi Games unearthed

2010-09-26 11:50:00
A plot to target or kidnap British athletes and fans coming to India for the 2010 Commonwealth Games has emerged over their country’s support to the war in Afghanistan.

Security sources have warned of “specific intelligence” about a threat by an unnamed Al Qaeda-linked group to take hostages in front of a global television audience.

Reports emerging from Australia suggest a number of countries are worried but will not upgrade travel warnings for fear of angering India.

They said citizens of Australia, the UK, Canada and New Zealand could be targets of a snatch attempt because their countries supported the war in Afghanistan.

Australia has asked fans not to wear national colours and in Britain it has emerged that security forces will work with counterparts from Canada, Australia and New Zealand to protect athletes at every venue.

“It is a serious situation. There is specific intelligence about an attempted hostage snatch. People travelling to India, and particularly Delhi, need to be aware of the risks,” The Daily Express quoted a source, as saying.

There are also concerns about Pakistani group Lashker-e-Taiba (LeT) getting into the act, after Michael Leiter, director of the US National Counter-Terrorism Centre, told the US Senate the games would make “an appealing target”. (ANI)





The West’s Plans to Partition Kyrgyzstan Are Nearing Completion

26 09 2010

The West’s Plans to Partition Kyrgyzstan Are Nearing Completion

The West’s Plans to Partition Kyrgyzstan Are Nearing CompletionIgor Kaminnik (Russia)

The last days of summer 2010 in Kyrgyzstan saw two events that can confidently be called crucial. The first event occurred when the international community began massaging information. On August 23, the International Crisis Group published a report and recommendations on its official website concerning events that occurred in the southern part of the country. The 39 pages of the report examined the events that took place during June 1990, the social and political situation during 2010, the events in Jalalabad and Osh and the chronology of the June riots.

The organization’s website used that report to provide recommendations to the Kyrgyz authorities and to the international community, specifically to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the OSCE’s High Commissioner on National Minorities.

We will not evaluate the quality and fairness of the report. Let the politicians and pundits argue about that. Everything would have been fine had not Louisa Arbour, the past UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and current head of the International Crisis Group, voiced the basic thesis with which her organization began its activities in Kyrgyzstan on the pages of the British newspaper, The Guardian. In her article, Louisa Arbour argued that it may unfortunately no longer be possible to prevent the country from falling apart.

The second important point of her propaganda message was “to support an investigation into the June events with central roles assigned to those with suitable expertise, such as the UN high commissioner for human rights and the OSCE high commissioner on national minorities. And it should be made clear that further aid to the Kyrgyz government will be conditional on such an investigation.”

That recommendation indicates that the plans to partition the country have entered their final phase. In light of that statement, how can we forget the main point of the International Crisis Group’s January 2005 report, which said Kosovo is more dangerous than Iraq?

The media did not cover the second event, but it was also crucial: the plan is to involve Martti Ahtisaari, “the architect of Kosovo independence” and destroyer of Yugoslavia, in Rosa Otumbayeva’s government to solve the “Kyrgyz problem.”

Martti Ahtisaari is a Nobel Peace Prize Laureate and is best known for his success in splitting Kosovo off from Serbia. World-famous film director Emir Kusturica made a telling comment during a visit to South Ossetia after George’s aggression: “The Nobel Prize went to one of the founders of Kosovo’s independence, Martti Ahtisaari, who initiated the bombing of Serbia. I have questioned the validity of the Nobel Peace Prize ever since.”

The quality of work done by the Nobel Laureate has been simply amazing. The Ahtisaari Plan was presented to the UN in early 2007, and by February 2008 Kosovo had declared its independence. The separatists and the secession of the independent state received support in Europe. How much faster will the “Ahtisaari Plan for Kyrgyzstan” be implemented in Central Asia? The reports of the International Crisis Group played a huge role in shaping public opinion and preparing the US government for aggression against Yugoslavia.

These two landmark events once again confirm the view of many analysts: the successful partitioning of Yugoslavia into many small states would accelerate the final fragmentation of the USSR into the former Soviet republics, or more precisely into the newly independent states that emerged on their territories.

The collapse of the Soviet Union was a strategic objective—if not an idée fixe—of many of the West’s political leaders. And these political forces did not finish the job 20 years ago when the Soviet Union collapsed. In many respects, the collapse of the post-Soviet republics, those new states, was foreordained when they were established. The administrative and territorial partitioning of the Soviet republics was an integral part of Stalin’s empire building, with all of the consequences of Rome’s “divide and conquer.” It created internal territorial and national conflicts and prevented the regions from being economically independent. All of these precautions succeeded as part of the USSR’s large international empire. But the conflicts that Stalin had built into the system surfaced as soon as the imperial and international organizational principles of state control were abandoned.

Parochial nationalism has become one of the main methods used to destroy these post-Soviet fragments, and it is highly effective. It came into use during the concluding stages of perestroika. It was evident in the Moldavian Gagauzia campaign of 1990, the Sumgait events that preceded the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the ethnic clashes in Kyrgyzstan and the Meskhteian Turk genocide.

After the Białowieża Accords of 1991 dissolving the USSR and the final transformation of the Soviet empire into the amorphous CIS, nationalism became the main reason the human, economic and cultural links formed during the Soviet era were destroyed. The form that nationalism took is unimportant. It might be a ban on the use of the Russian language, denial of rights to Russian speakers in the Baltic states and Ukraine or aggression against Transdniestria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh. Political nationalism heated up and then took on “democratic” forms again. The problem is endemic in all of the national republics of the former Soviet Union: the almost European Baltic republics that joined the EU; Ukraine, Moldavia and Belarus, which are suspended between Asia and Europe; and the republics in the Caucasus and Central Asia.

Stalin knew what he was doing when he established the national Soviet republics within their current borders. He understood very well that fragments of the Soviet empire could not survive on their own. Their nationalism would destroy them. So 20 years later we see that the process of destroying the fragments of the Soviet Union has entered its final phase, and the main instrument of that destruction is nationalism. The color revolutions in Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine and Georgia are the best proof of Stalin’s geopolitical genius. Democratic leaders in those countries seized power by exploiting the discontent of the people with the post-Soviet reality. Nationalism was the main political tool used by those democrats. The primary outcome of the color regimes has been the real threat that the countries where color revolutions took place would lose their integrity.

Orange President Yushchenko ultimately split society into Western and Eastern Ukraine and established a legal precedent by ceding part of Ukrainian territory to Romania.

Saakashvili’s nationalistic madness caused Georgia to lose Abkhazia and South Ossetia for good—a significant chunk of its territory. Bakiyev’s government in Kyrgyzstan exacerbated the separatist aspirations of some nationalist diasporas. The political “failure” of the color revolutions is forcing the United States and its allies to employ the methods proven in the Balkans. The situations in Kosovo and in southern Kyrgyzstan are following the same script.

The Americans achieved three main objectives in Kosovo:

- The undermining of Europe as a global competitor with the risk that Kosovo will unite with Albania and become a center around which Europe’s increasing Muslim presence can consolidate. With Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo today is already forming an “Islamic belt” that cuts off Serbia and Montenegro from Western Europe.

- The recognition of Kosovo and the partitioning of Iraq became important steps toward the ultimate destruction of the postwar system of international law.

- Kosovo is a major drug transshipment hub. Afghan heroin makes up a large part of the drug trafficking that supports the region. Heroin production increased 40 times after the United States and NATO intervened in Afghanistan in 2001.

There have been numerous reports about the use of US military transport aircraft to ship drugs—possibly through the air bases in Kyrgyzstan, Turkey and Lithuania. The UN Office for Drug Control and Crime (UNODCCCP) has indirectly confirmed that reporting. According to it, the heroin distribution centers in Europe include Ramstein (Germany) and the American Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo. Goods are transferred from Afghanistan to US Air Force bases without undergoing a customs inspection.

Alexander Anderson, the International Crisis Group’s Kosovo Project Director, confirmed in an interview that Kosovo is one of the largest drug trafficking corridors, and he said that organized crime there has even increased under UN administration.

Martti Ahtisaari probably has a personal interest in Kosovo’s independence. The German media got hold of an intelligence report from the German intelligence service, BND, which said UN Special Representative Martti Ahtisaari, who proposed the plan for Kosovo independence, received about 40 million euros from Albanian billionaire politician Behgjet Pacolli. No one refuted the report, and the scandal was quickly hushed up.

By partitioning Kyrgyzstan, the United States is achieving virtually the same kinds of objectives:

- Undermining a global competitor in the post-Soviet space. Dispersing those involved in the political process of integration with Russia. Establishing zones of instability and American influence supported by military bases in southern Kyrgyzstan and the Manas airport.

- The final destruction of the political remnants of the Soviet period and the establishment of preconditions for a new redivision of the world.

- Full control of drug trafficking from Afghanistan. Control over southern Kyrgyzstan and the establishment of a state there that is “independent” as far as the world is concerned, but dependent on the United States will make it possible to further boost the amount of heroin sent to Russia and the European Union.

- The problematic administrative and territorial partitioning of the Ferghan Valley that was a legacy of the collapse of the Soviet Union, which laid the foundation for permanent ethnic and territorial conflicts.

Marti Ahtisaari and the International Crisis Group should probably also achieve these objectives. All of the components for implementation of this plan are already in place:

- Efforts have begun to shape public opinion, which is concerned about the ethnic conflicts in Kyrgyzstan. If the International Crisis Group’s recommendations that it participate in an independent study by the OSCE and the UN are adopted, those conflicts will obviously be considered ethnic cleansing.

- The existence of areas densely populated by national minorities that are subject to “ethnic cleansing” and which the international community is forced to protect.

- Elections to Kyrgyzstan’s parliament scheduled for October 10, 2010, which will obviously not be recognized by one of the opposing sides—the pro-American (opposition) parties that came to power after Bakiyev, and the parties funded by Bakiyev politicians. The separation of the Kyrgyz themselves into southerners and northerners also contributes to implementation of the Ahtisaari Plan.

International Crisis Group Head Louisa Arbour accurately described the situation in her Guardian article: “In the process [of the June riots] the government lost whatever control of the south it once had. Melis Myrzakmatov, the ruthless and resolute nationalist mayor of Osh, the largest southern city, emerged from the bloodshed with his political strength and extremist credentials strengthened. Now caught between a humiliated provisional government on one hand and the renegade mayor on the other, southern Kyrgyzstan is a serious security risk in the region and beyond.” As noted by Ishenbai Kadyrbekov, leader of the Kyrgyz political party Union of the SSR, people are under the impression that the parties are preparing for the Battle of Stalingrad, not for parliamentary elections. There is a chance that this battle will be a battle for the integrity of the country.

SourceNew Eastern Outlook





Lawyer’s Horrific Fate In Balochistan

26 09 2010

Exclusive Pictures of Ali Sher Baloch’s Final Moments

Exclusive Pictures of Ali Sher Baloch’s Final Moments

Editor’s note: It was very hard to chose between journalistic ethics, which prevent us from publishing such gruesome pictures, and public emotions. The Baloch Hal is publishing these photos not with the intention to hurt the feelings of Ali Sher’s family but to show the real picture of the existing situation in Balochistan with the hope that justice will prevail.





Pakistan minister quits after accusing army of killings

26 09 2010

Pakistan minister quits after accusing army of killings

Pakistan Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani meeting army chief Gen Ashfaq Kayani, 12 Sept 2010
The army has played a major role in Pakistani politics

The Pakistani minister for defence production has resigned after criticising the military.

Abdul Qayum Jatoi had told journalists on Saturday that the Pakistani army was provided with funds to defend the country, not to get involved in political assassinations.

His comments were played repeatedly on Pakistani television channels.

Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani summoned him to explain his remarks and a short time later, Mr Jatoi resigned.

“We provided the army with uniforms and boots not so that they kill their own fellow countrymen, kill Nawab Sahib [Bugti] and Benazir Bhutto,” he told a news conference in the city of Quetta.

Military might

Former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto was assassinated in December 2007 as she was campaigning in Pakistan’s presidential elections.

Nawab Akbar Bugti was a tribal leader in the province of Baluchistan who was killed in a battle between government forces and tribal militants in August 2006.

Pakistan’s military has carried out coups against the civilian government on three occasions – in 1958, 1977 and 1999 – and has governed the country for much of its 63-year history.

There has been speculation in the media that the Pakistani military would move against the civilian government, which was widely criticised for its handling of the recent floods.

However, most analysts believe a coup is unlikely at the moment.

During the same news conference, Mr Jatoi suggested that the benefits of corruption should be equally available to all.

“All groups — Sindhi, Pakhtun, Baloch, Seraiki and Punjabi – should get an equal share in corruption,” he said.





Pakistani security forces attacked in Turbat, Panjgur and Hub, one official reported injured

26 09 2010

Pakistani security forces attacked in Turbat, Panjgur and Hub, one official reported injured

ccupied Balochistan: According to reports published on Daily Tawar two rockets were fired on an FC check post in the Aapsar region of Mand Balochistan. Heavy firing was heard in the area after the attack on FC check post. No casualty has been reported so far. B & R office in Turbat has also been set on fire by unknown persons. Meanwhile a huge blast was heard in surrounding of Turbat Airport and the FC has surrounded the entire airport vicinity after the explosion. The routes in and out of the airport have been blocked, reported independent sources.

Separately rockets were also fired on a Pakistani Navy construction base at Koh-e-Imam area. The building has been heavily damaged in the attack

Moreover a loud explosion rocked Balochistan port city of Gawader, where China has invested hugely to find a future strong foot hold in this strategic & economic important port in the region, according to locals the bomb blast was so powerful that it had shattered the window panes of the adjourning houses in Gwader city. Ambulances were seen going towards the port where the blast was heard. However, the local authorities have said that they could not locate the site of the blast until the so far.

Another huge blast was also reported in Mach town of Balochistan. Furthermore, unknown men hurled a hand grenade on a drug Warehouse in Panjgur’s Gharib Abad region. No harm to anyone has been reported, however, the depot has been heavily damaged.

On the other hand an FC check post has been attacked in the industrial town Hub Balochistan on Friday. As a result three person including one Pakistani FC officials has been wounded. The FC patrolling team came under attack near Sher Ali petrol station in Hub town, at least one official has been reported injured. Heavy contingent of the FC and Police have surrounded the adjourning area and started a search for the attackers. However, no arrests have been made so until the last reports. It is worth mention that it was the second attack of the day on FC in Hub.





Bomb Explodes Outside US Embasy in Tbilisi

25 09 2010

Blast in Tbilisi

Civil Georgia, Tbilisi / 22 Sep.’10 / 13:05

An explosive device went off at about 1am on Wednesday in suburb of Tbilisi, about 100 meters from the U.S. embassy building, police said.

No one was injured.

Police destroyed with water cannon another explosive device found in the same site, where formerly an open-air auto market was located. Now empty area is next to a cemetery and explosion damaged its wall and a grave.

A wall, dividing the U.S. embassy territory from the area, is located about 60-70 meters from the location where the explosive devices were set off, Shota Utiashvili, head of information and analytical department of the interior minister, told Civil.ge. He said the embassy wall was not damaged.

The U.S. embassy in Tbilisi confirmed that its property was not damaged.

Police said the investigation was ongoing and declined to reveal type of explosive devices or other details.





Trump Signs On to Saakashvili’s Free Enterprise Paradise Experiment

25 09 2010

[SEE: Saakashvili Lays Out ‘Act on Economic Freedom' ;  Poti Free Industrial Zone]

Letter of Intent signed between Trump Organization and Silk Road Group on Georgia Development

22 Sep 2010

On September 21st, in New York City, at the Trump Tower on 5th Avenue, Mr.Donald Trump and Mr. Giorgi Ramishvili, Chairman of the Silk Road Group, have signed the document that marks the initial step for the well known Trump brand to enter the Georgian real estate market. The signed letter of intent calls for the first ever Trump-tower in Tbilisi as well as potential projects to be constructed in Adjara Sea resorts. The signing ceremony in New York City was attended by the President of Georgia, Mikheil Saakashvili along with other important guests and the members of the Georgian and US press.

The possibility for the Trump brand to enter Georgia was first discussed in New York, during the meeting between President Saakashvili and Mr. Trump. The meeting was organized by the Silk Road Trans-Atlantic Alliance, the US extension of the Silk Road Group. The New York meeting was followed by Mr. Michael Cohen’s visit to Georgia in July, in order to take a firsthand look at the potential sites for the first Trump project in the country. Mr. Cohen is an Executive Vice President of the Trump Organization. The signed letter of intent is the result of a number of consultations in recent months and came after a careful analysis of the market potential of Georgia.

“We are delighted to have an opportunity to partner up with Mr. Trump and his entire organization. I am confident that the signature – golden standard- of the Trump brand that is well known to the world, will give the additional boost to the Georgian real estate market and to the growing Georgian economy as a whole. I’ve pledged to Mr. Trump that our company, Silk Road Group and I personally will do our best to make the Trump project a reality, and I also thank him for his trust in our company and in the future of my country” – says Mr. Ramishvili.





Gazprom under Pressure

25 09 2010

Gazprom under Pressure

Western energy companies charge by the Russian gas giant discounts as prices fall on the open market. However, the Group has stubbornly

Eduard Steiner

When the Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin is something in his head, he moves through it like it. How has the present, he told recently in the southern Russian resort of Sochi. There interviewed the 57-year-old during a conversation hour with foreign experts so to speak themselves, “What brings a company more profitable?” he asked. ”Flexible and have to make concessions to keep the whole market share – or to be harder, not give in and accept a loss of market share” Putin said the management of semi-state gas giant Gazprom and critically acclaimed that the manager – probably with his blessing – have opted for the hardness, “And so they should be able to continue on this path.”

Hardness regardless of the consequences: experts and Western customers shake their heads. The fact that Gazprom is still on its long-term customer contracts and the binding persists in the gas price to oil products, while on the open market, the gas is far cheaper to have, contrary to market-based logic. Gazprom’s average price is currently at 280 dollars per 1,000 cubic meters, the average spot price as on the relevant U.S. Henry Hub in August at about $ 160. ”The changed market situation for us all new,” says one Western Gas Manager in Moscow: “Like other participants and Gazprom will be forced to react.”

The economic crisis has dampened demand in Europe, Gazprom’s main market sensitive. Then there was that the U.S. stopped because of the production slate (“Shale Gas”) the import of LPG. Your previous supplier, the State of Qatar, was forced then to divert its gas to Europe. The Norwegians, as Germany quickly charged a quarter of the gas supplied to cheaper spot prices, gained market share. Although Russia remains Europe’s largest supplier and disclosed in the European OECD countries, only 27 percent of gas imports, two years ago but there were still 31 percent ten years ago, even 39 percent.

“Gazprom is under enormous pressure,” says a representative of a western gas company, who declined to be named. Customers regret having embarked on the long-term purchase contracts with specified quantities and with oil prices and demand an easing of the contracts. But Gazprom is hard. And with Putin’s backing. While Gazprom is not entirely without compromise. In part, the Russians have made concessions. Mainly E.on provided with the outcome, now 15 percent of the gas purchased from Gazprom to pay for cheaper spot prices for attention. The competitors keep up with their negotiated outcomes on the other hand behind the mountain. The German Wintershall will be made no worse than the others, with the Group reported a confidant, Gazprom pay attention to equality. Whether it is the smaller customer RWE been bestowed, will not comment on it. ”And Gazprom itself not published the data,” said Dmitri Absalov, gas expert at the Moscow Center for Political economy. The group wants to create a precedent.

Not only German customers speak to at Gazprom or advertise in the foyers of the Russian decision-making points for their concerns. The lobbyists French and Italian gas companies romp there. Gazprom says no to requests, says only that it had already shown “flexibility” – but the principle of long-term contracts will be retained.

The question is of course not, if all consumers achieve a negotiated outcome of E.on. The question has been how to Gazprom wrests further concessions.”Western companies are not to be complacent,” says one Western Gas Manager. In the headquarters of E.on and Wintershall are added diplomatically: You lead them further talks with all major gas producers, with the long-term supply contracts to the current market conditions, adapt, they say about at E.ON.

Gazprom itself provides the flexibility exhausted and therefore neither possible nor a need for further negotiations. Gazprom is not a “Konjunkturschik,” Gazprom deputy chairman Alexander Medvedev said some time ago. Meaning, Gazprom is sitting on market fluctuations. The fact that the Russians are playing for time, had to do with the national character, says Mikhail Korchemkin, director of East European Gas Analysis consultancy institute: “According to the mentality of the Russians yielding nothing but demonstration of weakness.” Nevertheless, the large customers in the West prospect of further success, experts say: “buy Price Breaker as Germany, France or Italy, the gas also at Gazprom’s competitors, have better opportunities than small customers,” said Valery Nesterov, gas analyst at the Russian investment bank Troika dialogue. ”The Russians are not panicking, but concerned.”

If the gas market will recover and adjust the spot prices reflect the long term, lose their customers leverage. Unlike many Western Group believes Gazprom’s deputy chairman Dmitry Medvedev that the demand on the market already in 2012 and is expected to climb to reach the pre-crisis thus the spot price on the same level as the long-run Gazprom’s price. The U.S. Energy Information Administration forecasts that the other hand, the average Henry Hub spot price of only 173 dollars for 1,000 cubic meters in 2010 and $ 180 2011th

But even if the spot price rises faster and can defend against Gazprom, therefore, the siege of western customers with tangible evidence: the company still runs out of time. Not only in Europe, the Group loses market share. Also from other continents are disturbing news. Some of America: There are operators of ports for liquefied just about to put in position to import gas, not just export from the United States as well. A blow to Gazprom: Finally, the Group had calculated that in the previous year, increasing by 2020 its market share in the U.S. from the current measly 0.5 percent to five to ten percent by gas from new deposits in liquid form over the Atlantic shipped. The U.S. needs imported gas less, that China requires more and more. But the People’s Republic is located closer to the Central Asian states. And China is looking to LNG in the spot market to the world. One of the biggest challenges faced by Russia in the coming decade, the preparations were on the structural changes in the energy market, therefore argues Xenija Judajewa, principal analyst of Macroeconomics at the largest Russian bank Sberbank. ”The substantial weakening in Europe, Gazprom does not have to degenerate into a national tragedy, but it takes more serious approaches to the management of this group.”

In part, Gazprom has already responded. And through diversification. Took the gas business a year ago, yet 73 percent of Group sales, so it is in the first quarter of 2010, only 64 percent. The oil business is increasingly important, and the current production already accounts for ten percent of sales.

Five years ago, Gazprom has taken the new course in order to transform itself from a “national champion” to a global multi-energy. This also contributed to the fact that Gazprom has tripled in spite of all difficulties on the gas market in the first quarter net profit last year to 8.3 billion euros. The sensational result owes itself but also exchange rate differences – and the domestic Russian gas customers. She, who always had to supply the Group with two thirds of its gas, without having to make some needed, due to higher domestic prices last dig deeper into their pocket. And because domestic prices continue to rise, could be the domestic market estimated to be important in five years, as Gazprom’s previous “Cachcow Europe”.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 43 other followers