TAJIKISTAN: New Civil War?

TAJIKISTAN: New Civil War?

2010/10/04

By TJKNEWS.COM

TAJIKISTAN: New Civil War?

On the night of 22 to 23 August from the detention facility of National Security Committee ran 25 people convicted and serving sentences for various crimes. For example, one of them – Ibrokhim Nasreddin nicknamed Ibrokhim Cory, a former Guantanamo Bay prisoner, was convicted in Tajikistan to 23 years to be served in the colony.However, according to the development of the State Committee of National Security, he was transferred to a remand prison, where he was inexplicably been created privileged conditions.

Tajik journalists have found out interesting details.“Quarantine on the night guarding the only three soldiers, which is easily handled prisoners. Nasreddin and one prisoner, who allegedly grabbed his stomach, went on duty, was attacked and brutally killed him, broken arms and legs. Two other guards were badly beaten and handcuffed. Taking possession of the keys, the organizers opened the escape of all the cameras, but decided to join them, not all. “ According to some sources, refused to shoot more than 60 inmates and defendants.

In the remand was a lot of camouflage military uniforms and weapons and fugitives quietly for three hours, from 22:10 to 1:20 getting ready for departure. They brought myself up, shaved, dressed in military uniforms and captured weapons were loaded into two vehicles belonging to the National Security Committee. The only obstacle was in office when leaving, when on duty that night Ensign refused to pass the machine without checking, he was killed.

President Rakhmonov was trying to create a secular ideology in pursuit of religious leaders that has caused the population of rejection of authority. Opponents Rahmon appear in different sections of the population and opposition continually threatens to turn into the second civil war.

After a week in the second largest city in Tajikistan – Khujand in the police station was blown up by car GAZ-24 bomb. Police officer was killed and another 25 people were injured. Local journalists have argued that the death toll higher, but official confirmation of this information is not available. Three days later in the Tajik capital Dushanbe bomb exploded in a popular nightclub, near the residence of the President. Sought medical treatment 10 people, three of them were seriously wounded.

The first fight between the escapees from detention center and the Tajik army took place on September 7 in Romitskom Gorge, 70 kilometers from Dushanbe. By the time one of the 25 fugitives were arrested, the others with a large quantity of weapons was a break in the mountain areas, where they waited for former fighters and commanders of the Tajik opposition, participated in the Civil War 1992-1997.

Who escaped from the detention facility and why the authorities in Tajikistan have started this military operation? Excluding the 11 foreigners, among whom are citizens of Russia – the other – the citizens of Tajikistan. They were arrested last summer in the east, only 46 people. 36 of them, then let go – they first took up arms, they did not kill anyone, and they decided to take pity. But later – changed their minds and re-arrested. A year later, two days before the escape, they were all sentenced to long terms. 23 people have received 30 years imprisonment …. And 30 years – the average age of runaways.

September 19 during a military operation to capture fugitives, whose number has decreased by seven people were detained at various times and in different regions of Tajikistan, in the gorge Komarob attack occurred on a convoy of equipment of the Tajik army. Until now officially claimed that as a result of the execution of the column with automatic weapons and rocket-propelled grenades killed 25 people, as many more were missing, that is captured. But Tajik journalists argue that the death toll was more than 40 people, and practically the whole column was destroyed.

In late September and early October, clashes continued. Fights have moved to those areas which, during the civil war in the mid-90′s were the center of the Tajik opposition, there were their bases and headquarters. There repeatedly during the war, sent columns of tanks and armored vehicles of the Tajik army or by destroying or seizing. Despite the support of Russian 201 th Division, stationed in Tajikistan, the opposition could not win, they better know their home area, they supported the population, they are constantly receiving reinforcements from the camps of Tajik refugees in Afghanistan.

Inter-Tajik negotiations under UN auspices, which lasted from 1994 to 1997, alternately in Moscow, Tehran, Islamabad, Kabul, Almaty and Ashgabat have led to general agreement. As a result, the United Tajik Opposition and the Tajik authorities declared an end to the war, the allocation of 30 per cent quota in government for the opposition. As a deterrence international organizations have developed programs to adapt the former opposition fighters by providing grants for small business development. Tajik authorities have begun to disarm the population, taking away or buying weapons, both carried out mine clearance hostilities.

Tajikistan’s civil war six years has killed about 150,000 people, although no one has calculated the exact number of victims. Emigration was more than a million people, most of the population was driven out by the Tajik army and its support of the Russian 201 st Division in Afghanistan, where he created the refugee camps. Quite quickly the refugees were structured: in the camps organized medical care, schools, worked the radio station Voice of Free Tajikistan, refugees replenish squads of armed resistance.In Afghanistan, the place had been training fighters and in many parts of the Tajik-Afghan border were equipped with secret passages, through which hundreds of trained young people poured into the “Islamic Army in Tajikistan.”

The former Soviet Union it was the first large-scale war that gripped much of the territory of Tajikistan.It began, as always, as a result of provocations in May 1992 when the former opposition party nomeklatury and nascent opposition reached its peak. That conflict began in September 1991, when supporters of the Democratic Party, People’s Movement “Rastokhez” (Revival) and is located in the underground Islamic Renaissance Party began its first meeting in the center of Dushanbe.

They were protesting against the communist parliament, which has remained from Soviet times and demand free elections. By the time the resignation has left the first president of Tajikistan Kahhor Makhkamov, who is also first secretary of the Communist Party of the republic. The confrontation escalated, the protesters dismantled the statue of Lenin, and then from Moscow, Mikhail Gorbachev was sent by Anatoly Sobchak and Academician Yevgeny Velikhov, who managed to convince the authorities in Tajikistan yet to begin preparations for the first free presidential elections.

Elections held in November 1991, but were nervous and with a large number of cases of fraud, depriving the opposition candidate filmmaker Davlat Hudonazarova opportunity to become the first post-Soviet space freely elected president. Large role in the falsification has played a big team from Moscow, which included and Russian generals. In the end, victory was awarded to Rakhmon Nabiyev, which earlier was also the first secretary of the Communist Party of the Tajik SSR.

The standoff resumed in March 1992 and in the center of Dushanbe at a square near the presidential palace was built tent city with its infrastructure – medical station, security service, cuisine and even its own radio station. The rally lasted for more than two months without a break, and a conservative estimate of opposition it was attended by several hundred people who came from all regions of Tajikistan.The city center was paralyzed, people are actively engaged in politics and at that time in Dushanbe were published more than 30 independent newspapers, which made it possible to learn not only about the news, but also different views on what is happening.

New president to negotiate did not want to go, he always consulted with Moscow and the May 11, 1992 first shots were fired on the outskirts of Dushanbe – it was absolutely an attack on the opposition. Then, in Tajikistan there was no army of its own, as there was no ministry of defense, but suddenly there was a lot of weapons. This charge is not only the Afghans, who allegedly supplied the opposition, but, above all, the Russian division, which not only supported in the civil war “legitimately elected president, but also participated actively in hostilities.

In response to the opposition, which became the nucleus of the Islamic Renaissance Party, began to form guerrilla groups that are already in the mid-90′s were assembled into a unified army with a unified leadership in the mountain area of Tavildara, where knock could not be any tanks of the Tajik army or the Russian aircraft. Gorno-Badakhshan (Pamir) is isolated and only the help of the Aga Khan IV, the spiritual head of the religious sect of the Ismaili Pamiris saved from starvation.

So far in the Russian press suggest a simple variant explanations of civil war in Tajikistan – Islamic war against the secular authorities, “while the” Islamists “- the same people of Tajikistan, brought 70 years of Soviet power, and the” secular arm “was a former Soviet Nomenclature. And the third president of Tajikistan – Rakhmonov, who replaced the name on the traditional manner – Rakhmonov, a former director of the most backward country farm named after Lenin. On the side of the opposition was part of the intelligentsia and the people who support democratic principles, and one of the warlords, the opposition was a former Soviet army colonel of militia Mirzohudzha Ahmad.

Restoration of peaceful life after the completion of negotiations in 1997, was tense, the authorities in Tajikistan to provide basically a single region – Kulyab that violate the regional balance of representation, to be observed even in Soviet times. Moscow to completely subjugate the Tajik leadership, but as it was traditionally assumed no economic projects and not to restore war-torn country did not participate.Growing labor emigration and is now variously estimated outside of Tajikistan is more than a million mostly young people looking for any job to feed their families.

The level of corruption in Tajikistan, has grown rapidly and economic indicators fell. President Rakhmonov was trying to create a secular ideology in pursuit of religious leaders that has caused the population of rejection of authority. Opponents Rahmon appear in different sections of the population and opposition continually threatens to turn into the second civil war. During the 13 years since the war 90 years, the Tajik authorities have not learned to peacemaking, so now in the mountains again going guerrilla, run by all tezhe warlords veterans – Mirzohudzha Akhmadov, Mullah Abdullah and Allovuddin Davlatov. And keep the world right now will be very difficult …

Oleg Panfilov
____________________
The author participated as an expert on human rights in the UN inter-Tajik talks in 1994-1997 (Moscow, Tehran, Islamabad, Kabul, Almaty, Ashgabat)

Source: Georgia Online

In Tajikistan, continue to block access to independent sites

In Tajikistan, continue to block access to independent sites

2010/10/04

By TJKNEWS.COM

In Tajikistan, continue to block access to independent sites

In Tajikistan, for several days blocked by local independent news resource Avesta.Tj, who along with another site Tojnews.Tj and external opposition and Centrasia.Ru TJKNEWS.com sites have been blocked since 29 September by a majority of local internet service providers.

As Director of IA “Avesta.Tj” Zafar Abdullaev, he already has evidence to block a site on the country because of what the traffic to the site of Tajikistan has decreased by 95%.
“As I learned from the lips of managers themselves companies ISPs, they were given a tacit reference to implement a lock – Abdullayev said. - Causes and timing is not specified. I’m inclined to believe this restriction of freedom of speech, because of the deteriorating military and political situation in the country and open information policy of the site.

A week earlier in a combat zone in the Rasht area of Tajikistan has been disabled with ground-based and mobile communication and Internet access. Government troops are searching escapees from the prison National Security Committee of Tajikistan, and began a military campaign against militants of the armed opposition, not laid down their arms after the peace agreement of 1997. Among the dead prisoners, including one Russian citizen, a native of Dagestan Hussein Suleymanov. Two more people from Dagestan, had fled from the Tajik prison – Ali Aliyev Magomed Akhmedov was seized during the raid two weeks ago near Dushanbe.

Source: RFE / RL

Operation “Mukanna”

Operation “Mukanna”

2010/09/15

By TJKNEWS.COM

Operation “Mukanna” (Classification of “boomerang”)

Operation “Mukanna“(Classification of” boomerang “)

The operation is a provocation: the physical destruction (with the use of handguns), a group of persons (masquerading as Islamists) shows a prominent political entity in the country (in Preview. According to chairman of the Supreme Assembly of Tajikistan, while the mayor of Dushanbe). Prorosiyskie communication and orientation is not like President ***.

Artists operations were in the spring and summer of this year incorporated into the IRP, received the Islamic party membership cards signed by M. Kabiri. often appear at various meetings and in the mosque IRP, trying to attract attention and be remembered among others. The participants also special operations during this period, several times on various occasions been involved in law enforcement, have been subjected to administrative penalties and written warnings, in his testimony, they will point to their membership in the ranks of the IRP. Awareness of participants of the terrorist group, its senior management and the further order is not known, probably known only by their immediate managers – trainers for combat training. May also undergo what is psychological and ideological indoctrination.

Operation is subject directly to the president himself RT, the leadership of the operation involves only a few special agents from the leadership of the President, Adviser to resident and foreign intelligence agent in the top leadership of National Security Committee of the Republic.

Plan of operations. In carrying out special operations “Mukanna is planned to exterminate Ubaidullaeva NY by “representatives of the IRP (may be pre-engineered by the conflict between city authorities and the leadership of the IRP). Then SCNS hot on the trail enters the “terrorist group” and destroying more knowledgeable members, captures the ordinary members, who will continue to give the “necessary evidence.”

Following are the searches in the IRP (found in caches in advance brought in and hidden weapons – identical seized from a terrorist group), on the arrests among the leadership of the IRP (perhaps most M. Kabiri) and revealed that some of the “string of crimes” leads to a family known Turajonzodah (their immediate arrest will not put the choice to leave the country )***.

In a special operation itself IRP has not been formally banned, but it will be able to “subscribe Enquiry”, ie virtually inactive, and restricted party. PIRT Regional offices will be fully given to “at the mercy of” local law enforcement agencies.

Visiting the mosques and Islamist sentiments citizens will be placed under heightened supervision of special services, such activity of Islamic clergy will be severely suppressed. (Post-Andijan syndrome).

After the assassination, people from the immediate environment Ubaidullaeva repeatedly invoked in the investigative and judicial authorities, where they subsequently knocked alternate version of “traitors and werewolves,” which will also be punished and removed from vlasti.Odnovremenno renaming a street in Dushanbe, the establishment of a monument in honor of the fallen mayor and other honors ***.

Organized propaganda (media and TV) wave of popular anger and resentment “against the IRP and other disloyal to the authorities of the Islamists. Exposing the “snake warmed breast »***.

The country “in order to stabilize for a time” a regime of emergency, arrests objectionable to the authorities, cleansing in the management and security structures, created anti-terrorist centers with the placement of part of NATO, made toughen rules restricting civil liberties, perhaps an amendment to the Constitution.

Power of the president stronger and actually turns into a dictatorship, the Islamic movement among the masses is suppressed, opposition parties and the media operate only within certain authorities. for key positions Parliament and mayor appointed a loyal figure, which eventually gives way to the president’s son (at present. time RI Deputy City Parliament )***. One shot President removes two birds with one stone, and arch-friend – the closest competitor for power, and gaining strength and popularity of the opponent, and his hated party with all the supporters ***.

*** The data were obtained from 3 different sources close to the participants s / o “Mukanna” (2-avg. step. Reliability. Paul. husband and wife, 1 – above average. step. sex husband.) match 2 / 3 of the key information. Deviation of a temporary, personal, non-essential. likelihood of success 4 +

Viktor Stepanov

Plot to Kill Leader of Islamic Party of Tajikistan “Gladio” Operation?

[This incident definitely fits the time-tested pattern of a "Gladio" ("false flag") attack.  Had it been successful it might have been portrayed in the govt media as one "Islamist" attacking another, justifying military action against the Muslim organization.  Govt. bans on religious training have nearly strangled the IRP opposition.  Perhaps the govt. forces believe that military moves against them before coming elections might be possible, as well']

A strange car accident. Leader of the Islamic Party of Tajikistan, M. Kabiri tried to kill?

13:35 04.10.2010

Attempted Muhiddin Kabiri, or simply banal car accident?

As a result of an automobile accident that occurred Saturday morning on the road Dushanbe-Kurgan-Tube, about 35 km from the capital, a car, which was chairman of the Islamic Renaissance Party Kabiri was damaged, and the Kabiri lung damage feet.

As reported by the Tajik service of Radio Liberty, the words of the editor of the party newspaper “Nachot” Khikmatullo Saifullozoda, leader of the party machine was moving in the Kurgan-Tube, where he and his colleagues were to take part in one event, the local cell of the party.

After passing a police checkpoint on the pass Fahrabad, they saw standing at the curb toned black jeep.Suddenly, because of his move toward the Kurgan-Tube, a machine or just stood there and at the curb, suddenly began to unfold in the opposite direction (the direction in Dushanbe). The machine with the leader of the party ran into the back of the machine. Kabiri received minor injuries and did not apply to doctors, but one passenger from another car, was hospitalized with several injuries in the hospital district Huroson. Between it, the other three, who were in the car immediately fled the scene. Also moved towards the capital the same suspect toned jeep. A little later on the scene there were police from the post Fahrabad made the protocol.

The correspondent of Radio Liberty, a former close to the site and then arrived there, said that interviews with victims car driver, “Nexia” and he could not tell who was his passenger, and found that the driver is not a professional taxi driver and not the patent .

It is worth noting that in recent years in connection with a military-political tensions in expert circles, rumors about a possible assassination attempt on the leadership ranks of the Islamic Renaissance Party. Also in one article to block Tajikistan blog Tjknews.com, was posted a provocative article “Operation Mukanna”, which refers to the plans for the physical elimination of the Chairman of the Majlisi Milli, the mayor of Dushanbe Mahmadsaid Ubaidulloyev, the prosecution in what was ostensibly to go to the leadership of the IRP and lead to their arrests.

An excerpt from the publication: “The plan the operation. In carrying out special operations” Mukanna is planned to exterminate Ubaidullaeva NY by “members of the IRP (may be pre-engineered by the conflict between city authorities and the leadership of the IRP). SCNS Then hot on the trail goes to the “terrorist group” and destroying more knowledgeable members, captures the ordinary members, who will continue to give “the necessary evidence.” Following are the searches in the IRP (found in caches in advance brought in and hidden weapons – identical seized from a terrorist group) Further arrests among the leadership of the IRP (perhaps most M. Kabiri) and revealed that some “threads crimes” leads to a family known Turajonzodah (their immediate arrest will not put the choice to leave the country). “

| 03.30.2010 |

See - Persona
Source - Avesta.Tj

Another Russian Intelligence General Killed, Alleged Suicide

Major General, retired shot dead in Moscow

Former head of Intelligence glavkomata Interior Ministry troops of Russia, Viktor Chevrizov shot at his house in Moscow, said a source in law enforcement.

Maj. Gen. shot of premium handgun, put a bullet in the head at the house on the street fan.The reason for suicide is installed.

Suicide note was not found, reports “Interfax” .

In Glavkomate confirmed suicide.

47-year military shot in the stairwell of house number 3 on the fan housing 2 street, reports RIA Novosti .

“General shot of premium handgun when my wife was at home. On the scene working task force, which ustanalivaet circumstances of the tragedy “- said the source agency.

According to the newspaper LOOK, a month earlier under mysterious circumstances, waskilled, Major-General Yuri Ivanov, who served as deputy chief of the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) of the General Staff of Russian Armed Forces. Source in the Russian Defense Ministry said that Ivanov was tragically killed while swimming. Other circumstances, as well as place of death is a general, not been reported

TTP kills Asian Tigers chief for Khawaja’s murder

[Are these reports of the same American spy being killed and dumped in N. Waziristan, on the same day?]

TTP kills Asian Tigers chief for Khawaja’s murder

Daily Times Monitor,  Oct 4

LAHORE: The Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) has killed the main chief of the banned militant group, the Asian Tigers, in North Waziristan, a private TV channel reported on Sunday.

According to details, the body of Sabir Mehsud was found early morning in the main market of the Razmuk area in North Waziristan.

A letter, stating that Mehsud was the leader of the Asian Tigers, and the TTP had killed him, along with two other aides after kidnapping them, was discovered from the body.

The letter also revealed that the Asian Tigers had abducted and killed former Inter-Services Intelligence official Khalid Khawaja in March, and the TTP had taken revenge of his murder by killing the Asian Tigers’ chief.

Militants kill 3 ‘American spies’ in Pakistan

October 03, 2010
PESHAWAR: Officials say the bullet-riddled bodies of three men have been found at the side of a road in North Waziristan on Sunday, killed by suspected Pakistani Taliban militants in apparent retaliation for recent US drone strikes in the area.

Two intelligence officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak to media, said on Sunday a note saying “anyone who dares spy for the Americans will meet the same fate” was found next to the corpses.

Local government official Asghar Khan confirms the report but wouldn’t identify the victims.

The slayings came the day after two suspected US missile attacks killed 16 people in the region, part of a recent surge in drone strikes in Pakistan along with stepped-up Nato operations along the frontier.
Associated Press

Fire extinguished on NATO trucks but stalemate continues amid threats

English.news.cn

A Pakistani fire fighter tries to extinguish the burning NATO oil tanker following an attack in Rawalpindi near Islamabad, Pakistan, Oct. 4, 2010.  (Xinhua/Zeeshan Niazi)

by Syed Moazzam Hashmi

ISLAMABAD, Oct. 4 (Xinhua) — The fire that destroyed nearly two dozens of NATO supply oil tankers was extinguished in Pakistan ‘s garrison city of Rawalpindi early Thursday morning. However, the ashes still contain threats of more such attacks amid Taliban claims, and stalemate amongst the troika of Pakistani government, insurgents and NATO continues as logistics blockade to Afghanistan entered the fifth day on Monday.

Earlier on Friday, nearly 35 NATO supply oil tankers and container trucks were set ablaze in a terrorist incident at Shikarpur in southern Sindh province. The same day two more NATO trucks were destroyed in southwest Balochistan province.

Bumper-to-bumper lines of trucks clogged at various points over a 1,000 miles stretch from southern port city of Karachi to Peshawar in the northwest are keeping Pakistani law enforcers and trucking companies sleepless amid security vulnerabilities.

“The Taliban plan to target NATO supply trucks across the country and the frequency of such attacks will be increased in days ahead,” Azam Tariq, a spokesman of disbanded Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) told media organizations on Saturday while claiming the responsibility of the attacks.

The screeching halt to vital supply trucking to over 140,000 U. S.-led International Security Assistance Force (IASF) fighting Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan, was imposed as security preventive measure and also to exhibit Pakistan’s anger over violation of its airspace by NATO helicopters.

NATO helicopters attacked a security checkpoint near Afghan border in North Waziristan tribal area on Sept. 30, killing three Pakistani troopers and wounding three others. A second violation occurred the same afternoon in nearby Kurram tribal area.

NATO offered an apology that apparently does not seem to be enough as the Pakistani government is having tough time under mounting public pressure amid mounting anti-Americanism, analysts believe.

An investigation over the violation of Pakistani airspace is currently underway in Afghanistan, which is also being participated by two representatives from Pakistan.

“It’s a temporary action,” the TTP spokesman said in a phone call from an undisclosed location referring Friday’s subversion in Shikarpur.

The Monday morning’s incident amply exhibits the gravity of terrorists’ threat and that how serious, quick, and practical they are. It was the third major incident that caused mass destruction of NATO contracted trucks since 60 such supply vehicles turned to ashes in June near the Pakistani capital. Over 150 NATO trucks were destroyed in various terrorist incidents during this year in Pakistan.

The Taliban spokesman warned, “If Pakistan remains passive in this matter (the NATO incursion), it will be clear that the country is being ruled by traitors.” The continuing seven-year-old Taliban insurgency has been attempting to impose an ultra orthodox controversial Islamic jurisprudence system and religiously fighting back Pakistani troops.

Reacting over the situation in the National Assembly, the low house of the parliament, Pakistani Prime Minister Syed Yusuf Raza Gilani warned of taking some other steps if attacks on country’s sovereignty are repeated.

However, analysts are more cynical about the strength of such political statements as Pakistan is heavily dependent on billions of dollars of U.S. military assistance given for being the frontline ally in the war against terror. It also needs to secure the badly needed emergency humanitarian aid to feed over 20 million people displaced by recent two months of floods and rebuild the severely damaged infrastructure across the country.

NATO supplies reach Afghanistan through Pakistan via Torkham in northwest Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Chaman border in the southwest Balochistan province.

Despite its desperation for alternate routes due to frequent terrorist attacks on its convoys, over 70 percent of NATO supplies and 40 percent of its fuel needs are heavily dependent on the shortest, physically convenient and economically cheaper route into Afghanistan through Pakistan. Something, the U.S. cannot afford to ignore, analysts say.

A controversial “no inspection” agreement also allows the U.S. to ship in “anything” from essential supplies to lethal weapons into Afghanistan through Pakistan that other countries do not allow.

Pakistani foreign office Sunday stated that the NATO supply blockade would continue until the security situation is improved.

“It’s going to have colossal effect on the region,” warned the U.S. Special Envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke in a teeth-grinding-gesture while arguing the NATO logistic blockade at a think tanks forum in Washington recently.

German Public Rejects Neo-Sovietization of German Democracy

Germany Shocked by ‘Disproportionate’ Police Action in Stuttgart

dpa

A hardline police operation against demonstrators protesting against a new railway station project in Stuttgart has shocked Germany, after more than 100 people were injured by tear gas and water cannon. German commentators argue that the police went overboard and warn of more violence to come.

The controversial Stuttgart 21 railway project has been the focus of increasing protests in recent months. But Thursday seemed to mark a turning point as the conflict between the authorities and protesters escalated dramatically.

Around 600 police used water cannon, tear gas, pepper spray and batons in an operation against over 1,000 demonstrators in the southwestern city of Stuttgart on Thursday. The activists had tried to use a sit-down protest to prevent the city’s Schlossgarten park from being cleared so that work could begin on felling trees in the park as part of construction work on the new station. Thursday’s protests were attended by a broad cross-section of society, including pensioners and children.

The protest’s organizers said in a statement that more than 400 protestors had suffered eye irritation as a result of the police’s operation, with some suffering from lacerations or broken noses.

The German Red Cross said on Friday morning that 114 demonstrators had been treated on site, and a further 16 were taken to hospitals. Among the injured were school children who had been taking part in an officially registered demonstration.

Images of people bleeding from the eye after being hit by water cannon featured on German television and newspapers Friday. One 22-year-old protestor suffered a serious eye injury after being hit in the right eye by a water cannon jet, a Stuttgart doctor told the news agency DPA, adding that the man might lose his sight in that eye as a result.

The Stuttgart 21 project involves moving the city’s main railway station underground and turning it from a terminus into a through station. The project is controversial partly because of its price tag — it is slated to cost €4.1 billion ($5.38 billion) — and because of the trees that will be cut down in the Schlossgarten park. There is also criticism that the project does not make sense from a transport point of view, as few main lines go through the city.

‘Confusing Germany with Putin’s Russia’

There has been a heated reaction to the police’s use of force, which was condemned by members of the center-left Social Democrats, Green Party and the far-left Left Party, which are all in opposition on the national level. Jan Korte of the Left Party said that it was not acceptable that that kind of police action was used against pensioners and school students. The Green Party filed a motion to have the issue debated in the German parliament, the Bundestag, on Friday, but it was rejected.

Several politicians criticized Heribert Rech, the interior minister for the state of Baden-Württemberg, where Stuttgart is located, for allowing the operation to go ahead. National Green Party co-leader Cem Özdemir, who is also from the state, said Rech was “confusing Germany with Putin’s Russia.” It was disproportionate that “pepper gas was sprayed in the eyes of grandmothers and children at close range,” he said. “We are in Germany. Such methods do not exist here.”

The police have defended their actions. Rainer Wendt, who is the head of one of Germany’s main police unions, told the news station N-tv that the police operation had been “not only legal but completely appropriate.” He admitted that the pictures in the media “weren’t pretty,” but added: “That’s not the police’s job. Its job is to carry out its legal duty.”

At a press conference Friday, Baden-Württemberg Governor Stefan Mappus defended the police’s actions, saying “I stand behind our officers.” He stressed the importance of the Stuttgart 21 project and called for a de-escalation in the conflict. “The images from yesterday cannot be allowed to repeat themselves,” he said.

Rech, the Baden-Württemberg interior minister, also defended the police operation, saying that officers had been appalled by the aggression with which they were confronted.

Sensible and Right

Even German Chancellor Angela Merkel felt obliged to comment on Thursday’s events. “I would like it if such demonstrations proceeded peacefully,” she told the regional public broadcaster SWR, which broadcasts in the southwest of Germany. “Anything that could lead to violence has to be avoided.” She defended the Stuttgart 21 project as sensible and right.

The escalation is likely to cause political problems for the state government, a coalition of Merkel’s center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the business-friendly Free Democratic Union. State elections will be held next March, and the Stuttgart 21 project is already a key campaign issue. The CDU has been in government in Baden-Württemberg for 57 years. If it were to lose the election, it would be a blow to the chancellor and her national government.

Construction work continued on the site on Friday under massive police protection, and the first trees in the park have now been cut down. But the next wave of conflict is not far off: Some 100,000 people are expected to take part in the next mass demonstration, which is planned for Friday evening.

On Friday, German commentators take a look at the police operation, with all agreeing it was disproportionate.

The Financial Times Deutschland writes:

“Every political movement has its critical turning points. For the Stuttgart 21 opponents, this Thursday might have been one of them. The reaction of the activists and the state government will now determine whether the turning point will lead to even more violence and political frustration. Regardless of whether there were reasonable grounds for the brutal police action — the pictures and eyewitness reports suggest the contrary — it was extremely unwise politically. Perhaps Baden-Württemberg’s government had hoped, with its uncompromising approach, to put a stop to the protests six months before the upcoming state election, to prevent Stuttgart 21 from becoming an issue in the election campaign. This hope, however, will be in vain.”

“The battle for Stuttgart 21 is becoming more like a religious war every day. The opponents and supporters of the project are irreconcilable. The two sides are no longer exchanging rational arguments but are engaging in mudslinging. In this kind of atmosphere, a tough approach will only lead to protesters deciding to dig in their heels.”

“It’s true that the government is right to enforce law and order on its territory. That necessarily includes clearing an area that has been occupied by protesters, for which a building permit has been legally issued. But a democratic state must preserve a sense of moderation and try to protect its citizens as far as is possible. It is debatable whether this happened in Stuttgart.”

The conservative Die Welt writes:

“Deploying heavily armored riot police against students is reminiscent of the old days and old attitudes which are not exactly popular in Germany’s liberal southwest. It is true that the protesters are trying to thwart a planning process that has been going on for 15 years, and thereby overturn the current position, which is legal and legitimate and was reached through democratic means. One can argue that the protesters are coming too late to the debate.”

“But even then, the use of state pressure and state force must remain proportionate. Not all the protesters are simply out to cause trouble. There are some among them who believe that the decisions about the project were not reached in a suitably democratic fashion. It is a sign of selfish impatience that they are nevertheless now trying to sabotage the start of construction. It is also a signal of a lack of effective communication when a state-level government believes it needs to resort immediately to force to prevent this kind of sabotage. The negotiations between the protesters and the project officials lasted less than a week, if that.”

The left-leaning Die Tageszeitung writes:

“Bizzare images and sounds were transmitted live via a mobile webcam out of Stuttgart’s Schlossgarten park on Thursday and beamed onto thousands of computer screens all over Germany. At first glance the images seemed familiar from … anti-nuclear protests in the past: Demonstrators sitting in the path of a police vehicle, police emerging dressed in absurdly war-like armour, wanting to clear the way for their colleagues and finally resorting to water cannons to do so. But (the images) didn’t fit with what came out of the headphones. Not only were a considerable number of the demonstrators chanting ‘Wir sind das Volk’ (‘We are the people,’ a slogan associated with pro-democracy protesters in East Germany) but they also began singing the German national anthem — further evidence for the presence of a core conservative element in the protest movement. After all, what is at stake is the kind of thing that conservatives like to preserve: almost 300 trees — some of which are very old — and a city park threatened with being turned into a construction site.

“The otherwise respectable citizens, who react to water cannons by singing the national anthem, see themselves as legitimate representatives of the nation and are in the process denying this role to those (authorities) who sent police into the park. Germany’s conservatives no longer feel represented by local and national government.”

– David Gordon Smith and Josie Le Blond

Vlog of Dmitry Medvedev on Belarus

October 3, 2010

Senseless strip tension in its relations with Belarus must end

Dmitry Medvedev: Russia’s relations with other countries already have been a topic of my video blog. I told you about how our emerging partnership with the United States, explaining why I think an important part of our country in the meetings “Twenty leading economies in the world. One, perhaps the most dramatic moments in relations with Ukraine last summer, I shared with you my thoughts on why the exhausted themselves trying to establish a dialogue with President Yushchenko.

Today I want to talk about what’s happening in the relationship with our closest ally – with Belarus. To talk to the Russians, and Belarusians. After all, we – the citizens of the Union State.

It is my deep conviction that our country has always belonged and will belong to the people of Belarus as its closest neighbor. We are united by centuries-old history, shared culture, common joys and common sorrow. We will always remember that our people – and I always want to say: our single people – have suffered huge losses during the Great Patriotic War. Together we went through terrible hardships and collectivization, famine and repression.

Now Russia and Belarus, are partners in the Union State. And both of our countries are also actively involved in the creation of a customs union, in the development of the EurAsEC, CSTO, the Commonwealth of Independent States. We intend to fully expand its cooperation with Belarus in the framework of these organizations. And we will, of course, hard to implement modern forms of economic interaction, and in full accordance with international practice of relations between such close allies, what is our country.

Proceeding from this, we have always helped the people of Belarus. In fact, since the collapse of the Soviet Union, which is almost 20 years, the volume of this support, whatever they say, are huge. Only this year due to favorable oil supply our help Belarus amounted to almost two billion dollars.Comparable subsidies are allocated and in the supply of Russian gas to Belarus. We do all this, because we are convinced: our people are inextricably linked.

It is therefore particularly surprising that the recent leadership of Belarus has adopted an anti-Russian rhetoric. The election campaign there entirely built on anti-Russian plots, the hysterical accusations of Russia’s unwillingness to support the Belarusians and the Belarusian economy, curses to the Russian leadership. For all of these shows a clear desire to embroil the States and, accordingly, the peoples.

The desire to create in the public consciousness the image of an external enemy has always distinguished the Belarusian leadership. Only earlier in this role were the Americas, Europe, the West in general. Now one of the main enemies of Russia declared.

President Lukashenko in his comments went far beyond not only the diplomatic rules, but also basic human decency. However, this too was not news to me. I remember I was surprised when at our first bilateral meeting, instead of focusing on the Russian-Belarusian cooperation, it is very detailed and exclusively in a negative manner, began to discuss my predecessors as President of Russia – Boris Yeltsin and Vladimir Putin. I had to remind then a colleague, that the subject of our negotiations are very different topics.

This kind of understanding of partnerships and Lukashenko has demonstrated in the recognition of Belarus in South Ossetia and Abkhazia as independent members of the international community. I have said repeatedly: to recognize or not recognize the two new states – a sovereign right of each country. And we never anybody did not exert pressure on this issue. While for us it is not indifferent.

The President of Belarus declared its readiness to do so in the presence of their colleagues, five presidents. There is a corresponding entry, if so to speak frankly – has remained in the minutes of the CSTO. Then the question turned into a constant object of political bargaining.

But Russia does not trade our principles. Such behavior is dishonest, and the partners themselves do not lead. And, of course, we will consider this when building relations with the current President of Belarus.

But against Russia and its leadership are the flood of charges and abuse. On this whole campaign is built Lukashenko. He was concerned very much: and restoring order in our economic relations, and communication to Russian media reports with the Belarusian opposition, and even the fate of some of our senior retirees and retired officials.

President of Belarus should deal with internal problems. Including, finally, to investigate numerous cases of disappearances. Russia, like other countries, it is not indifferent.

Of course, this does not determine the relations between peoples and individuals. In this I am sure as President of the Russian Federation. I am also sure that this senseless band voltage must end.

I would like to just say: Russia is keen to develop allied relations with Belarus. Moreover, no matter who led Russia and Belarus – our people will forever be fraternal. We want our citizens did not live in fear, and in an atmosphere of freedom, democracy and justice. And we are ready to go this way together with our Belarusian friends.

I don’t understand the SBU

I don’t understand the SBU

Viktoria Siumar

I don’t understand the SBU

I thought we were past the time when the workers of the secret services kept their citizens scared, when people were afraid to tell the truth, and when there was only one newspaper, which was also called “Truth.”

Today we’re living in a different time, in the world of Internet, which cannot be limited with borders; we should have developed antibodies to fear; it seemed we came to the conclusion that any closed system is inefficient, and that nobody or nothing can control everything.

Nevertheless, this is exactly what’s happening. The secret service of this state of 46 million people conducts “preventative talks” with civic activists, attempts to explain to university rectors why their students need to abstain from taking part in protest actions, checks non-government organizations surviving on grants, and detains workers of foreign funds at the airport.

I do not understand why people who introduced themselves as representatives of the State Security Service (SBU) come to my concierge to ask for information on the residents of my apartment. I don’t understand why they’re interested in the people who live there, who come and go. After all, they can address all these questions to me directly – I have nothing to hide.

In a free country secret services can develop an interest in particular citizens based on concrete suspicions of actions that threaten national security. I would be very interested to know what parts of my public, human rights protection or journalistic activities are so disliked by the SBU.

However, to have a conversation like this one has to have a good reason. In a free country secret services can develop an interest in particular citizens based on concrete suspicions of actions that threaten national security. I would be very interested to know what parts of my public, human rights protection or journalistic activities are so disliked by the SBU.

It’s also unclear why the secret services waste their time talking to the activists of the Democratic Alliance youth organization. The organization’s mission is the political education of youth, meaning that young people are taught to understand the essence of the rule of law, and how a citizen can defend his or her rights. It would seem that the state itself should be interested in spreading such information.

I don’t understand why the main voice of President Viktor Yanukovych Hanna Herman talks about the high professionalism of SBU chief Valery Khoroshkovsky, if Ukraine has had to officially deal with several international scandals caused by the very service he heads.

These include the detention of Niko Lange before Yanukovych’s visit to Germany, talks with rector of the Catholic University in Lviv during a conference of rectors of European universities, and so on.

I also fail to understand why people in the president’s office on Bankova stubbornly fail to see Khoroshkovsky’s conflict of interests in the whole saga with Channel 5 and TVi. Khoroshkovsky does not hide the fact that he owns nine TV channels, and at the same time, his wife’s media company sues these two independent channels to take away their frequency licenses.
Is it so difficult to understand that against the background of all these facts any declaration made by Yanukovych about his “devotion” to the ideas of democracy and free press seem like mockery.

I was surprised by a recent remark made to me by parliament deputy Inna Bohoslovska during a discussion about freedom of the press and the SBU’s actions. Commenting on the “collection of information” about civic activists by the nation’s secret service, she asked who finances the Institute of Mass Information, which I head. Then she proceeded to answer that it’s George Soros, an American billionaire and philanthropist, and said that everyone should remember “how the Orange Revolution was exported.”

It seems that in the ranks of the party of power, which has concentrated the most power anyone has ever had in Ukraine, this is still a sore point. It seems that they still have not realized that a revolution cannot be created with the money of even a dozen Soroses, that the revolution was made by Ukrainians, induced by the actions of the Ukrainian authorities.

People were induced by the censorship on TV, which today is so carefully reinstated by the current set of managers; by the overwhelming corruption which is only “fought with” using only words; by the economic policy in the interest of several oligarchs, at the expense of small and medium business; by the complete detachment of the power elites from their own people, who simply fail to see the reality from behind the windows of their Mercedes cars and expensive restaurants.

But these explanations for the reasons behind the revolution are uncomfortable, because it would mean that people in power would have to change. It’s much easier to blame the “export” and foreign funds.

The current set of people in power much more easily accept and learn from the experience of the neighboring Russia. They control TV Russian-style, destroy self-governance the same way, marginalize the opposition and tell the West about their “sincere devotion to the ideas of democracy and human rights,” while at the same time refusing people the right to hold peaceful demonstrations.

It seems that the most important thing that the current top power brokers have failed to understand is a simple truth that former President Leonid Kuchma once loudly announced: “Ukraine is not Russia.” This stubborn refusal to accept the reality can cost them a lot.

Viktoria Siumar is head of the Institute for Mass Information in Ukraine, a non-profit organization. You can read more about its activities on http://imi.org.ua.

Tajik Def. Minister Urges Prosecution of Media for Reporting Military Actions

Defense ministry accuses media of unilateral coverage of events in Rasht


04.10.2010 17:07

Author: Payrav Chorshanbiyev

DUSHANBE, October 4, 2010, Asia-Plus  — The Ministry of Defense (MoD) states that the majority of reports by Tajik independent media over an attack on a military convoy in Rasht and the latest developments in the area cover the events unilaterally.

In a statement released on October 4, Defense Minister Sherali Kairulloyev says that journalists do not realize that by releasing such reports they assist terrorists and play into their hands “and thereby they commit serious crime.”

The minister wonders why journalists have covered that terrorist attack unilaterally.  “In their reports, journalists describe errors and shortcomings of the Ministry of Defense, its officials and servicemen as if they are outstanding military experts.  But they don’t not ask themselves who and by whose order conducted that shameful and inhuman act,” sad the statement posted on Khovar’s website.

“Moreover, these media have the face to demand apology from the Ministry of Defense for recent TV program, in which they were harshly criticized.  But it is you esteemed journalists that must apologize, if you have a heart.”

The statement also notes that there are some political parties and separate politicians that superficially condemn the terrorist, accusing the government of emergence of the problem.

“At a time like this, they demand dialogue and negotiations,” said the statement, “I wonder whom this dialogue must be conducted with? With terrorists and killers or with you, leaders of political parties?  If we meet with you and fulfill your demands, terrorists will be satisfied?  If so, one may conclude that they are forces that were illegally armed by you because they consider your opinion.  Therefore, there ought to think before saying.”

At the end of the statement, the Ministry of Defense demands law enforcement authorities of the country make a legal assessment of reports by Tajik independent media over events in the east of Tajikistan.

The ISI-Taliban Alliance behind attacks on NATO supply trucks in Pakistan

The ISI-Taliban Alliance behind attacks on NATO supply trucks in Pakistan

Collateral damage: On Sunday, 3 October, at least six killed as NATO oil tankers were ambushed by the ISI’s agents in Islamabad

There is now irrefutable evidence which suggests the following:

1. The ISI-Taliban Alliance (i.e., the Taliban in uniform and the Taliban in civil clothes) are behind recent attacks on NATO supply trucks in Pakistan

2. Pakistan’s foreign office is completely dominated by the ISI. Pakistan’s civilian government has no control on the country’s foreign policy. In particular, policies on India, Afghanistan, USA, UK etc are made in the army’s GHQ and implemented through their civilian servants (civil bureaucrats) in the foreign office.

3. There is currently an intense battle happening between the ISI and the CIA. Innocent Pakistanis and Afghanis are being killed in this battle by both spy agencies on both sides of the Pak-Afghan border.

Here is a selection of media reports which can be reviewed as an evidence to the above statements:

1. Pakistan shut down the Torkham border crossing – the most important NATO supply into Afghanistan – on Thursday in apparent protest of a NATO helicopter attack that killed three Pakistani soldiers on the frontier. It was the third such incursion into Pakistan in less than a week.

2. Senior U.S. officials acknowledged high tension between the two capitals that crested with the border closure. On the Pakistani side, the incursions into Pakistan by U.S. forces fighting in Afghanistan provoked an unusually strong government condemnation. On the U.S. side, publication of a video that may show Pakistani military officers summarily executing insurgents threatened to undermine public and congressional support for U.S. aid. (Source: Huffington Post)

3. “Oh Pakistani soldiers, shoot down the drones, cut the NATO supplies and abandon American’s war,” said a statement from the Pakistani branch of the international Islamist group, Hizb ut-Tahrir.(Source: Huffington Post)

4. Just after midnight, about 10 suspected militants attacked 27 tankers parked at an ordinary truck stop on the edge of Shikarpur town in Sindh province, far from the Afghan border. They forced the drivers to flee by firing in the air before setting them ablaze, said police officer Abdul Hamid Khoso. A truck driver and his assistant were burned alive in the second attack on a single tanker in the parking lot of a restaurant in southeastern Baluchistan province, said police officer Mohammad Azam. (Source: Huffington Post)

5. Public reaction? Pakistan has not imposed any ban on the supply of goods to Nato forces but merely shut it down temporarily due to security reasons, Foreign Office Spokesperson Abdul Basit said on Sunday. “We did not ban Nato supplies. The temporary suspension comes in the wake of public reaction after the attacks. It will be restored when things get settled,” Basit told a British television channel. (Source: Express Tribune)

6. Taliban claim the attacks: Nato oil tankers in Shikarpur were torched by Taliban – By Mushtaq Yusufzai – PESHAWAR: Pakistani Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack on Nato oil-tankers near Shikarpur in Sindh on Friday in which 27 tankers were burnt. The Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesman Azam Tariq on Saturday called media people, including The News, from an undisclosed location and took the credit for the attack on oil-tankers in Sindh. He said the armed men who attacked the Nato supply vehicles in Sindh were in fact militants and affiliated with the TTP led by Hakimullah Mahsud. He said those involved in the first-ever attack on the Nato supplies in Sindh belonged to the mobile ‘Siyara Group.’ “They were local militants and had acquired training in South Waziristan and returned to their native towns to start attacks on government and security installations,” he claimed. Azam Tariq said 27 oil-tankers were destroyed in the attack. The oil-tankers, he said, were parked near a filling station in Shikarpur. The Taliban spokesman said they had already attacked Nato supplies in Peshawar, Khyber Agency, Islamabad and various places in Balochistan and the Punjab and would now target them in Sindh as well. (Source: The News, 3 Oct 2010)

7. The ISI-CIA battle: Analysts say that Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and United States’ Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) are locked in an intense battle to secure their respective countries’ interests in the region. On Saturday U.S. helicopters violated Pakistan’s airspace and killed 50 people in the bordering area of the country near Afghanistan. And it seems that the ISI retaliated on Friday by torching NATO oil tankers for violating Pakistan’s airspace. The CIA stepped up its unmanned aerial bombing campaign in Pakistan. The CIA initiated 20 attacks with armed drones so far in September, as top officials work to stem the rise of U.S. casualties before the Obama administration’s review of its Afghanistan strategy in December, The New York Times reported Tuesday. Pakistan criticized a pair of NATO airstrikes on its territory, saying they were a violation of its sovereignty. U.S. officials have said they have an agreement that allows aircraft to cross a few miles (kilometers) into Pakistani airspace if they are in hot pursuit of a target. But Pakistan denied on Monday such an agreement exists. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a press release Monday that the mandate of foreign troops in Afghanistan ends at the Afghan border. Pakistan said that unless corrective measures are implemented, it will have to “consider response options.” (Source: Tehran Times)

8. The ISI’s admission: “Pakistan is not a walkover country,” warned the senior ISI official. If the United States continues its cross-border attacks, he said, “I will stand in the way of the convoys myself.” (Source: Washington Post)

9. ISI’s private support and public manoeuvring on the drone attacks: The ISI has privately backed the drone attacks, even though the Pakistani government publicly protests them. But the official cautioned that the recent barrage may be overkill. He said that by Pakistan’s count, of the 181 drone attacks since 2004, 75 have come in the past nine months. “The quality of the targets is not as good,” he said. “The perception is that you are trigger-happy.” Asked about American attempts to target the Haqqani network, a ruthless Taliban faction that in the past has had links with the ISI, the ISI official seemed to give a green light: “I would be happy if they go today. It will end so much trouble for Pakistan.” But he said Pakistan would oppose any attempt to widen the so-called “box” within which Predator drones can strike targets. (Source: Washington Post)

The Ideological Convergence Between USA and USSR

Tomas Schuman: Love Letter To America

Please note. Bezmenov was talking about Soviet society and propaganda in the 1960s and 1970s. That means his analysis of the general dynamics of propaganda has to be cautiously reconfigured, when it comes to specifics. The US and USSR he described then (prior to the 1980s) had clearly differentiated economic/political systems. In the 30 years that have passed since, the ideological convergence he mentions elsewhere, has in many ways occurred, or is in the process of occurring. [I describe this in much greater depth in "The Language of Empire."]

The USA hasn’t been free-market capitalist in any real way for some 20-30 years, at the very least. Instead, we’ve had ever-accelerating state intervention and crony capitalism that has turned into the final danse macabre of casino capitalism and pure plunder.

Thus the terms that Bezmenov uses in discussing the totalitarian communism of the Soviet system now actually apply to the US, albeit incompletely.

Bezmenov didn’t know, or perhaps chose not to express, since this was the country he defected to, that US propaganda and psyops were far more subtle, and thus in the long run more effective, than Soviet propaganda.

He also doesn’t acknowledge that at many levels “capitalist” and “communist” leaderships were/are symbiotic and that they have ultimately led to the globalized kleptocracy, in which the two ideological forms, while retaining different emphases, copulate and spawn the “third way” of corporatized politically-correct social democracy, which is the benign face of the corrupt neo-liberalism that has always been the power behind the throne of the multilateral institutions, such as the World Bank, IMF, EU, UN, and others…

There is no longer a west versus east polarity. The division is really between centralizers (neoliberal globalizers, central bankers) and decentralizers, in which, however, some of the decentralization is orchestrated to promote the globalizers’ agenda.  One has to know the specifics of every situation. They can’t be understood ideologically.

Five Algerian soldiers killed in Islamist attacks

Five Algerian soldiers killed in Islamist attacks

Media reports militants ambush troops as they pass Zekri forest in Kabylie region.

ALGIERS – Militants attacked soldiers hunting down Islamist fighters in eastern Algeria at the weekend, killing five of the troops and wounding 10 more, newspaper reports said Monday.

A remote-controlled bomb exploded as troops passed the Zekri forest in the Kabylie region late Saturday and then militants opened fire with automatic weapons, according to the Al Watan daily, which cited security forces.

Islamists have established their headquarters in the area.

The soldiers had been looking for members of the former Salafist Group for the Preaching and Combat (GSPC), a group which formed an alliance with Al-Qaeda.

The Liberty daily cited security sources saying that the army had sent significant reinforcements to the region.

The Algerian army launched on September 23 a massive sweep against the Islamists, with the group Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) increasingly active in north Africa. The group grew out of the GSPC.

The day after the operation was launched, a senior officer taking part was wounded in a bomb attack.

Authorities have not released a toll for any casualties among the Islamists.

Chinese firm bags rail link deal in Central Asia

Chinese firm bags rail link deal in Central Asia

China is brokering a massive political and business deal that will result in rail links between Afghanistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan in Central Asia. A Chinese company has bagged a contract from the Afghan government to carry out feasibility studies for the proposal line.

The proposed 700 kilometers line will run right through the hotly contested Taliban areas while connecting the Aynak copper mines in northern Afghanistan with Kabul and the two neighboring countries.

India has been eager to help Afghanistan build its railway system as part of the reconstruction efforts. But it has apparently been checkmated by China because of its influence as an investor in the local copper mines and Pakistan’s aggressive support for the Chinese firm.

Mr Wahidullah Shahrani Afghanistan’s minister of mines said that “This northern railway is part of a wider plan to extend the Afghan rail network to connect Afghanistan to ports in Iran and Pakistan.” The rail link was essential for the transportation of iron ore and copper.

The China Metallurgical Group Corporation, which has been involved in the development of Aynak copper mines, has been entrusted the task of carrying out feasibility studies and work out the construction program.

MCC has estimated that the line will cost USD 5 billion and take five years to be completed, and half of the time would be spent on the feasibility study. It is obvious that the long two and half years kept aside for feasibility study is actually the waiting period required to ensure that the Taliban areas are peaceful enough to begin construction work.

The agreement with Afghan government specifies that MCC will lay the line under a build own, operate and transfer concession after the local government approves the feasibility study.

(Sourced from Times of India)

Obama administration fingerprints on Ecuador coup attempt

[Way to go, Wayne!]

Obama administration fingerprints on Ecuador coup attempt

by Wayne Madsen*

With Nobel Peace Prize laureate Barack Obama, coups against unaccommodating Latin American leaders would appear to be back in style. After Honduran President Zalaya’s overthrow in June 2009, Ecuador’s Rafael Correa was the latest target. An outspoken member of the Bolivarian Alliance (ALBA), Correa had been giving Washington a tough time. Behind the abortive coup, Wayne Madsen’s investigation not only unveils the modus operandiof the CIA, but also lays bare the disturbing activities involving the Mossad in Ecuador.

JPEG - 66.3 kb
Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa speaks from the balcony of the Carondolet Palace as hundreds of supporters gathered to greet him in Quito; September 30, 2010.

Using the standard CIA playbook on toppling democratically-elected governments in Latin America, the Obama administration, which was not happy with Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa’s moves to increase state control over oil companies in the nation and his decision to oust the United States military from its airbase at Manta, appears to have suffered a major defeat in the failed coup attempt in Ecuador by police officers and Air Force personnel who were backed by rightist elements in the National Assembly and business community. Correa was re-elected with an overwhelming majority last year after he gave the U.S. military its walking papers from the Manta airbase. The Pentagon and CIA have been working to topple Correa ever since by pumping money into opposition political parties and other groups through NGOs funded by the U.S. National Endowment for Democracy.

In a statement from Correa after his rescue from the Police Hospital in Quito by a military special operations team, the president warned of a larger conspiracy launched against him by his political opposition, saying the “attempt at destabilization is the result of a strategy that has been brewing for quite some time. A barrage of messages and misinformation have been given to the National Police, which today has been realized through violent actions from a conspiracy attempt.”

Correa’s predecessor, the pro-U.S. Lucio Gutierrez, who is wedded to foreign oil company interests in the country, was accused by the government of covertly supporting the police and Air Force mutineers.

Although Secretary of State Hillary Clinton issued a weak statement saying the United States backed Correa, it came one day after Clinton heaped praise on former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, the person who helped to craft the September 11, 1973 coup in Chile and the assassination of its progressive president Salvador Allende. In fact, Clinton and Obama had given military and political support to the right-wing junta that ousted democratically-elected progressive President Manuel Zelaya in Honduras in June 2009 and has fought against allowing the ousted democratically-elected president of Haiti, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, to return to his country from exile in South Africa after the CIA-engineered coup against him in 2004.

Clinton’s tepid response to the attempted coup against Correa was in marked contrast to the strong denunciations of the attempted coup and messages of support for Correa that came from Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Mexico, Bolivia, Cuba, and Spain.

JPEG - 83.4 kb
Riot police repel supporters of Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa from reaching the hospital where he took refuge for protection from police protesters, in Quito; September 30, 2010.

And the fact that Correa, like Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who was briefly ousted in an April 2002 coup organized by the CIA, was held as a virtual hostage at the Police Hospital in Quito for the greater part of a day provided a grim reminder of an old CIA tactic in staging coups in Latin America. Chavez was briefly held hostage on a Venezuelan island in the Caribbean while a U.S.-registered plane stood by to fly him into exile. In an emergency Latin American summit meeting in Argentina, Chavez saw the U.S. behind the events in Ecuador. He said, “The Yankee extreme right is trying right now, through arms and violence, to retake control of the continent.” Chavez’s own experience with a CIA backed coup and the June 2009 coup, supported by the Pentagon, CIA, andMossad against his ally Zelaya in Honduras, makes him an expert on CIA and Mossad tactics in the region. Informed sources have told WMR [1] that Correa and Chavez are currently comparing notes on the coups launched against them.

Ecuadorian intelligence will be looking closely at the wereabouts of key CIA personnel stationed at the CIA station at the US embassy in Quito and a smaller CIA station within the US Agency for International Development (USAID) mission in Guayaquil. In the 2002 coup attempt against Chavez, the US embassy’s top CIA and DIA officers were discovered to be helping to direct the coup from Venezuelan military installations.

Clinton’s State Department has been casting Ecuador in a bad light throughout the past two years, calling the country “difficult to do business in,” the only real priority that the Obama administration cares about due to its total subservience to Wall Street and the fat cat bankers. The State Department’s “Investment Climate Statement” for Ecuador states: “Ecuador can be a difficult place in which to do business. . . There are restrictions or limitations on private investment in many sectors that apply equally to domestic and foreign investors . . . A 2006 hydrocarbons law imposed new conditions in the petroleum sector that have been problematic for many companies, complicated by a 2007 decree that imposed additional restrictions. A 2008 mining mandate stalled mining activity, and a new Mining Law is expected in early 2009. Negotiations for a free trade agreement between the United States and Ecuador, which would have included investment provisions, stopped in April 2006. The current Government of Ecuador has not expressed interest in restarting negotiations.”

Correa’s financial policies, as well as his foreign policy that saw him order out the American base at Manta and establish close ties with Venezuela, Iran, and other countries inimical to American and Israeli hegemony, placed a huge CIA and Mossad target on Correa’s back. In June, Ecuador sponsored a resolution at the Organization of American State (OAS) summit in Lima condemning Israel’s attack on the Turkish aid flotilla transporting humanitarian aid to Gaza. Ten nations voted with Ecuador in support of the resolution.

JPEG - 91.8 kb
Ecuadorian army soldiers stand on the runway of the military airbase of the Mariscal Sucre International Airport to force its closure, in Quito; September 30, 2010.

The uprising among Ecuadorian Air Force ranks, with Air Force personnel taking over and shutting down Quito’s international airport, will have Ecuadorian counter-intellligence personnel looking closely at the possible role of Israeli technicians and trainers who support the Air Force’s 26 Israeli-made Kfir combat planes. Israel also reportedly sold Python-3 air-to-air missiles to the Ecuadorian Air Force in 1997.

Mossad also has its hooks into the Ecuadorian National Police, where the main coup plotters received support. Mossad is chiefly tasked with spying on Ecuador’s large Ecuadorian-Arab community. The activities of the Mossad station at the Israeli embassy in Quito before and during the coup attempt will also draw the attention of counter-intelligence officers. Last year, Tel Aviv-based On Track Innovations received a contract to provide an electronic biometric-based electronic identification card system to Ecuador’s Central Registry Office.

Israel Has Picked On the Wrong Sleeping Giant–China Hit

BEIJING, Oct. 1 (Xinhua) — Computer experts have warned that a “super” virus has attacked more than 6 million personal computers and almost 1,000 corporate computers in China.

The Stuxnet cyberworm can break into computers and steal private information, especially from industrial firms, sending it back to a server in the United States, said Wang Zhantao, an engineer at the Beijing-based Rising International Software Co. Ltd., a leading antivirus service producer in China.

The super virus made use of a bug in Siemens auto-control systems used in industrial manufacturing to skip the security check, Wang said.

The virus can copy itself and spread via U-disk in the network of a company and government.

“Hackers may take control of a company’s machinery run under computers infected by Stuxnet, and give dangerous orders causing serious damage,” he said.

The company has developed software to kill the virus, which can be downloaded for free from the company’s official website, he added.

China had 420 million Internet users as of June, according to statistics from China Internet Network Information Center.

Israeli Cyber-Worm Will Bite US On the Ass

Israeli cyber unit responsible for Iran computer worm – claim

An elite Israeli military unit responsible for cyberwarfare has been accused of creating a virus that has crippled Iran’s computer systems and stopped work at its newest nuclear power station.

By Richard Spencer and Damien McElroy

Israel demonstrated its intent to conquer cyber warfare in the 1990s by presenting the country's legions of hackers with a choice between prison and working for the state.

Israel has led the way in combating cyber attacks Photo: ALAMY

Computer experts have discovered a biblical reference embedded in the code of the computer worm that has pointed to Israel as the origin of the cyber attack.

The code contains the word “myrtus”, which is the Latin biological term for the myrtle tree. The Hebrew word for myrtle, Hadassah, was the birth name of Esther, the Jewish queen of Persia.

In the Bible, The Book of Esther tells how the queen pre-empted an attack on the country’s Jewish population and then persuaded her husband to launch an attack before being attacked themselves.

Israel has threatened to launch a pre-emptive attack on Iran’s facilities to ensure that the Islamic state does not gain the ability to threaten its existence.

Ralf Langner, a German researcher, claims that Unit 8200, the signals intelligence arm of the Israeli defence forces, perpetrated the computer virus attack by infiltrating the software into the Bushehr nuclear power station

Mr Langer said: “If you read the Bible you can make a guess.”

Computer experts have spent months tracing the origin of the Stuxnet worm, a sophisticated piece of malicious software, or malware, that has infected industrial operating systems made by the German firm Siemens across the globe.

Programmers following Stuxnet believe it was most likely introduced to Iran on a memory stick, possibly by one of the Russian firms helping to build Bushehr. The same firm has projects in Asia, including India and Indonesia which were also attacked. Iran is thought to have suffered 60 per cent of the attacks.

Mr Langner said: “It would be an absolute no-brainer to leave an infected USB stick near one of these guys and there would be more than a 50 per cent chance of him pick it up and infect his computer.”

Cyber security experts said that Israel was the most likely perpetrator of the attack and had been targeting Iran but that it had not acknowledged a role to its allies.

“Nobody is willing to accept responsibility for this particular piece of malicious software which is a curious, complex and powerful weapon,” said one Whitehall expert.

The Iranian authorities acknowledged the worm had struck Bushehr and a statement conceded that the plant would come into operation in January, two months later than planned.

Elizabeth Katina, a researcher at the Royal United Services Institute, said the possibility of a copycat attack on British or American electricity networks or water supplies had been elevated by the release of Stuxnet.

“Critical national infrastructure is at greater risk because this shows groups on the outside of governments how to do it,” she said. “It’s more likely now that the northeast of England power grid can be shut down until someone decides to start it up again.”

‘Stop FBI raids’

‘Stop FBI raids’

Citizens protest FBI raids. COURTESY PHOTO

Local peace activists protest national FBI raids

By Zenobia Jeffries
The Michigan Citizen

DETROIT — Free speech, constitutional protections and liberty are all at stake for the protestors who gathered outside the McNamara Federal Building in downtown Detroit Sept. 28.

They were part of a national protest against FBI raids of the homes and offices of anti-war and solidarity activists in six cities across the country.

“There are 31 cities demonstrating today from Los Angeles to New York,” attorney and spokesperson for Michigan Emergency Committee Against War and Injustice (MECAWI) and Moratorium NOW! Jerry Goldberg told the Michigan Citizen.

In the early morning of Sept. 24, in “coordinated raids” FBI agents subpoenaed and raided homes of anti-war, trade union and “progressive” activists in six cities: Grand Rapids, Mich.; Chicago, Ill.; Milwaukee, Wis.; Minneapolis, Minn.; and Durham, N.C. It’s been reported that activists in California were also victims of the raids.

“Computers, books, documents, notebooks, cell phones, passports, videos, photos, items belonging to the victims’ children and other personal belongings” were confiscated from eight homes and offices.

Protestors have been denouncing the raids through demonstrations and protests since Sept. 27.

Goldberg said all the demonstrations were being held at approximately the same time in front of federal buildings around the nation to send a message to the federal government. The groups are calling on the government to disband the grand jury scheduled to hear testimony from those subpoenaed beginning Oct. 5 in Chicago.

“A grand jury is being set up to meet Oct. 5 to indict people without lawyers,” Goldberg said. “We demand [it] be disbanded.”

Goldberg likened the raids to the [anti-communist] hearings that took place during the McCarthy era.

“This is nothing but a witch hunt,” he said. “Like McCarthyism. These so-called investigations need to stop.”

Tom Burke of Grand Rapids says his home was not raided, but he and his wife both received subpoenas the day of the raids to appear before a grand jury in Chicago Oct. 19.

Burke, who speaks out publicly in support of Colombia, says he doesn’t know how it was determined whose home or office would be raided and whose would only be subpoenaed.

“As of today, 14 people have been subpoenaed,” Burke said, the morning following the Detroit protest. “This is a repression of the antiwar movement … Most of us care a lot about Palestine and Colombia … We try to bring peace and be good neighbors instead of making war on people,” Burke said.

Burke is a member of the Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO) and Columbia Action Network.

Burke’s subpoena requires him to submit “all materials, photographs, e-mails, any type of information or communication concerning work with interaction with Colombian trade unionist.”

“People had boxes and boxes of their files, hard drives and children’s artwork taken away,” he said.

“It’s not a crime to say you support people of Colombia, Palestine, Afghanistan, or Iraq. It’s not a crime to say you’re opposed to U.S. militarism and imperialism. It’s not a crime to say you support the oppressed all over the world,” said Abayomi Azikiwe of MECAWI. “It’s not a crime to say you support independence and justice.”

Azikiwe, who’s also an organizer with the Detroit Coalition Against Police Brutality, says MECAWI and Moratorium NOW! have joined the International Action Center in condemning the Sept. 24 FBI raids on the anti-war and solidarity activists.

“We’re in total solidarity with those raided,” Azikiwe told the M.C.

Azikiwe says the raids are a diversion to deflect the growing unemployment, poverty, feuds with school closures and healthcare in the United States, and their [the U.S.] losing war in Colombia and Afghanistan.

“It’s a mechanism to divert people’s attention on liberation movements across the world because they [the movements] are making progress,” says Azikiwe. “There’s no future in U.S. imperialism. The U.S. stands naked before the world.”

Azikiwe says all around the world people are seeing the bankruptcy of U.S. imperialism being exposed.

“We condemn the FBI, the U.S. Justice Department, and the Obama Administration,” says Azikiwe. “If he [Obama] doesn’t change this course, he’ll definitely be a one-term president.”

Goldberg says the raids are an extension of a legal case [Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project] in the Obama Administration that continues from the Bush Administration.

In Holder v. HLP the court made it a crime to provide support, including humanitarian aid, literature distribution and political advocacy to any foreign entity that the government has designated as a “terrorist” group.

“They got the Supreme Court to redefine the definition of material aide,” Goldberg said. “[Obama] is continuing the Bush Administration policy to attack free speech.

“[The organizations experiencing FBI harrassment] haven’t given money to [these] liberation movements,” said Goldberg.

Burke says the agent serving him told him the goal was to bring charges of material support for groups on the U.S. terrorist list.

Burke believes the charges are false.

“We don’t send money or material to any groups … we publish interviews, do analysis of what’s happening in Colombia and Palestine and many other places,” said Burke. “Any money or funds go to publishing the newspapers.”

Burke says the networking organizations’ goal is to bring awareness to those in the United States and support to those in war-ridden countries.

The National Lawyers Guild (NLG) issued a statement in support of the peace activists.

“The Guild denounces the attacks on free speech, freedom of association, and the right to dissent that these actions represent. The raids and summonses reflect escalating hostility toward individuals and groups working in solidarity with the Palestinian and Colombian people and are blatant political attacks on peaceful activists.”

The NLG is coordinating defense of the raids.

The San Franciso Labor Council Union adopted a resolution Sept. 27 also condemning the raids.

They wrote in the resolution that the raids, “marks [sic] a new and dangerous chapter in the protracted assault on the First Amendment rights of every union fighter, solidarity activist or anti-war campaigner, which began with 9/11 and the USA Patriot Act.”

All groups, organizations, unions, etc. affiliated with the protests and demonstrations are demanding the government:

- Stop the repression against trade union, anti-war and international solidarity activists.

- Immediately return all confiscated materials.

- End the Grand Jury proceedings and FBI raids against trade union, anti-war and international solidarity activists.

A coalition of progressive organizations in metro Detroit participated in the Detroit protest, including Solidarity, the Green Party, UAW members, AFT members, National Lawyer’s Guild members, MECAWI, Moratorium NOW! Coalition, Bail Out the People Movement, UAW Pride at Work member, Peace Action Michigan, Detroit People’s Task Force, Workers World Party, Labor Notes, International Action Center, and Labor Exchange.

Soviet Collapse Ruined the U.S.

Georgi Arbatov was rightdepriving us of an enemy might have been the worst thing that Gorbachev could have done to us.  When the “evil empire” was no longer there to force us into adopting a “good” counterpoint, we were without purpose.  Lucky for us that the CIA had a ready-made nemesis for us to posture against, a global network of super terrorists–an army of Islamic James Bonds, otherwise known as “Al Q.”  All they had to do was to point us in their direction.]

Soviet Collapse Ruined the U.S.

04 October 2010

In 2005, then-President Vladimir Putin called the collapse of the Soviet Union the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century. As time passes, I find myself agreeing with him more and more.

To be sure, my regrets are fundamentally different from Putin’s. I’ve been a U.S. citizen for three decades, and my son is as American as they come. The United States is clearly my home, and I consider myself a patriotic American. This is why I decry the disappearance of the Soviet empire. Its demise may have dealt a potentially mortal blow to the United States.

The Soviet Union strained its resources and pauperized, exploited and oppressed its own people in order to compete with the United States, the embodiment of the bitterly adversarial capitalist system. Most Soviets didn’t believe the authorities who told them that they were living and working in a “workers’ paradise.” It was a struggle that its leaders believed would prove the supremacy of communism. It was bad for the Soviet Union but a godsend for the United States.

The Soviet propaganda droned incessantly about how workers are impoverished and exploited under capitalism. It tried to flip the truth on its head: to deny that the U.S. government after the Great Depression implemented policies that helped raise incomes while drastically improving the work conditions and financial well-being of workers.

In the 1950s, things got even better for U.S. workers. The gap between the rich and the poor was the narrowest in U.S. history, and the U.S. middle class reached new levels of prosperity.

Soviet forays into post-colonial Africa and Asia and the revolutionary movements it fomented in Latin America forced Washington to pay attention to those countries and assist in their development. Even discounting support for the occasional tyrant, it did much good and helped spread U.S. influence and American values around the world. Even if they are not always followed in practice, democracy and free enterprise have become dominant political values globally.

To counter the Soviet “Evil Empire,” the United States willy-nilly had to go for the moral high ground and become a moral arbiter in world affairs. Now, China is gradually replacing U.S. influence the world over.

Finally, the Soviet Union strained its dysfunctional economic system to create a first-rate scientific and military complex. Sputnik, launched in 1957, galvanized the United States into action. A huge government effort to improve math, science and engineering followed. Funding for education and research was increased sharply, and the government and private universities expanded programs for the brightest students to go to the best universities, regardless of their parents’ ability to pay. The space race did little for the average Russian, but it did create a broad infrastructure for science and technology in the United States that set the foundation for U.S. supremacy in innovation, which the United States enjoys to this day.

After the Soviet collapse, Washington found a different adversary: al-Qaida. As a result, the leading 21st-century military and economic power is wasting its resources on a medieval war, gradually descending to the level of its new foe.

Osama bin Laden may be history’s greatest military strategist. He made Washington abandon its lofty moral ideals, forced the United States into a sea of debt and played a key role in pushing the United States off its pedestal of being the world’s supreme economic power. But ultimately, it is the collapse of the Soviet Union that is to blame.

Alexei Bayer, a native Muscovite, is a New York-based economist.