Kyrgyz Court Sentences 17 Uzbeks To Life, for Ethnic Violence and Murder

24 11 2010

17 sentenced over Kyrgyz ethnic violence

17 sentenced over Kyrgyz ethnic violence

Supporter of the Kyrgyz nationalist Ata-Zhurt party stands in front of a banner showing the body of an ethnic Kyrgyz woman, whom organizers of the rally claimed had been killed in clashes with the Uzbek minority in June, in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, Sunday, Oct. 24, 2010. Hundreds of supporters of a top Kyrgyz politician rallied Sunday in central Bishkek the day after he claimed to have been wounded in a politically motivated attack.AP

 

Today at 08:30 | Associated Press

BISHKEK, Kyrgyzstan (AP) — A court in southern Kyrgyzstan has sentenced 17 people to life in jail for mass killings and rioting during ethnic violence that wracked the region in June.
Judge Damirbek Nazarov ruled Wednesday the men killed 16 people on the highway linking the south with the Central Asian nation’s capital, Bishkek.
All defendants in the trial that ended Tuesday were ethnic Uzbeks. The ruling will arouse fresh fears that the community is being singled out for prosecution over the violence that killed 370 people.
International rights activists largely agree the Uzbek minority sustained the bulk of the violence.





Lisbon Goes On Strike Against Austerity Cuts

24 11 2010

Portuguese on general strike against austerity

Portuguese on general strike against austerity

Unions in Portugal on Nov. 24 stopped trains and buses, grounded planes and halted services from healthcare to banking in protest against wage cuts and rising unemployment.

 

Reuters

LISBON, Nov 24 (Reuters) – Portugal’s two biggest unions held their first joint general strike since 1988 on Wednesday, hoping to weaken the Socialist government’s resolve on implementing austerity measures meant to tackle a debt crisis.
Unions stopped trains and buses, grounded planes and halted services from healthcare to banking in protest against wage cuts and rising unemployment in western Europe’s poorest country.
Prime Minister Jose Socrates, whose government is struggling to quash speculation that Portugal will be the next in Europe to need a bailout after Ireland and Greece, has pledged to stay the course on wage cuts and tax hikes to cut the budget deficit.
"Maybe the strike will not provoke radical changes in the austerity course the government has chosen, but it does represent an additional element of uncertainty in the already unstable setting in the country," said Elisio Estanque, a sociology researcher at the University of Coimbra.
The unions hope to tap into the growing dissatisfaction with the minority Socialist government’s austerity measures, which also include across the board spending cuts in public services.
"It’s the workers who are paying for the crisis, not the bankers nor the shareholders of big companies," said Leandro Martins, a 65-year old pensioner.
"This is a strike against rightist policies, to demand new policies serving the Portuguese people."
Portugal has suffered from years of low growth — unlike other weak euro economies such as Ireland and Spain that went from boom to bust — and waning competitiveness which economists say undermines its ability to ride out the debt crisis.
The country’s risk premium — or spreads on its bonds over safer German Bunds — hit a euro lifetime high on Nov. 11 and was close to that level on Tuesday, ending at 450 basis points.
Even though the economy is growing this year, economists fear it will slide back into recession in 2011 as higher taxes and civil servant wage cuts of five percent bite into consumption.
Unemployment, already at its highest since the 1980s at 10.9 percent, could rise further.
Lisbon has been plastered with banners for weeks urging workers to join the industrial action, and national airline TAP, workers at Volkswagen’s <VOWG.DE> Autoeuropa plant, public train and bus drivers have all promised to participate. There will be no mass protests on Wednesday but unions are organizing picket lines in many sectors.





Documenting a tragedy

24 11 2010

Documenting a tragedy

 Documenting a tragedy Josef Stalin

David Marples

This week, Ukrainians worldwide are commemorating the 78th anniversary of the Great Famine of 1932-33, known as the Holodomor (Death by Hunger).
In the period 2005-2009, when Viktor Yushchenko was president of Ukraine, several archival collections on the Famine-Holodomor of 1932-33 were made available to researchers, which supplemented earlier information gathered mainly from eyewitness reports. Perhaps the most important of these were reports from the Soviet secret police files (then called the OGPU, from 1934, the NKVD).
With the demise of the Yushchenko government in the 2010 presidential elections, the authorities have done a U-turn on the Famine question. The OGPU has a new leadership, files are no longer freely disseminated, and the new president Viktor Yanukovych has denied that the Famine was an act of Genocide. On the contrary, Yanukovych appears to adhere to the Russian perspective that famines were a general phenomenon across the Soviet grain growing regions in 1932, including the Volga region, Ukraine, the North Caucasus, and even Belarus.
It is true that Famine was widespread in the spring and summer of 1932, but many events that took place later in the year, and in the brutal year of 1933 were unique to Ukraine and the North Caucasus, particularly the Kuban region, which was composed of about 60% Ukrainians. And this is evident from the OGPU documents released over the past two decades.
It is well known that the great upheaval of collectivization and the removal of richer (“kulak”) families had a devastating impact on Soviet farms. The subsequent imposition of grain quotas by Stalin’s regime was to ensure that deliveries were transported to the towns or the Far East before the families could feed themselves.
A widespread drought in 1931 exacerbated the situation, but it did not lead directly to Famine. In theory farms can feed themselves. But they were not allowed to. Not only grain was confiscated from Ukrainian villages, but also seed grain, and subsequently meat, potatoes, and other crops as a penalty for failing to meet grain deliveries.
Kaganovich devised the idea of a “blackboard” for those villages in North Caucasus that failed to meet quotas. They were then isolated, trading ended, and no one was allowed to enter or leave. The “blackboard” was soon extended to the Ukrainian SSR.
Stalin, together with his associates [Vyacheslav] Molotov and [Lazar] Kaganovich, railed against Ukrainian party and government leaders (Stanislav Kosior and Vlas Chubar) for their weakness and failure to take more ruthless measures. Though Ukraine’s grain quota was twice reduced, it was still well beyond farmers’ capacity to meet. Therefore the Soviet leadership took several measures calculated to transform a severe situation into a catastrophe.
First, Ukrainian leaders were bypassed. Instead, in November 1932, Molotov led a Commission to Ukraine and Kaganovich to the North Caucasus to impose order. In January 1933, Stalin sent a personal emissary, Pavel Postyshev with full authority in Ukraine as well as Vsevolod Balytsky, who took over the republican OGPU. While Postyshev used the army and local activists to take “hidden” supplies from the villages, cordoning off and starving villages that failed to meet quotas, Balytsky instituted mass repressions from early 1933 onward on the grounds that a mass uprising of Ukrainian nationalists had been planned for the spring of 1933 with the aid of outside forces from Poland.

The consequences were not merely mass starvation, but wholesale arrests, deportations, and executions that did not occur elsewhere in the USSR.
In January, the OGPU reported 436 “terrorist acts” in Ukraine during the grain procurement campaign. About 38,000 arrests had been made, and 391 “anti-Soviet, kulak, counter-revolutionary groups” had been uncovered. Over 6,600 arrests had been made on collective farms, mostly comprised of the farms’ leadership. By January, over 8,000 had been dispatched to concentration camps.
By mid-February, the situation had escalated. The OGPU set up a “shock-operational group” in 200 districts of Ukraine and at railways stations and border crossings. It sent word to Stalin that “we are clashing with a single, carefully elaborated plan for an organized armed uprising in Ukraine by the spring of 1933, with the goal of removing Soviet power” and setting up an independent, capitalist, Ukrainian state. Needless to say, these groups had to be eradicated and thousands were subsequently deported.
No serious evidence of a planned uprising has ever emerged. Stalin was afraid of “losing Ukraine” as he wrote to Kaganovich and saw plots and plotters everywhere. Balytsky chose to feed his fertile imagination.
The repression of Ukraine’s villages led to a mass exodus of men-folk while those remaining behind simply starved. In February 1933 alone, about 85,000 peasants had fled the Ukrainian countryside. The vast majority were detained at the border and returned to their villages, or else arrested and sent to labor camps. Border crossings from North Caucasus to Ukraine, and from Ukraine into Belarus and Russia were closed. The OGPU noted that these had been escape routes in 1932 and were not about to make the same mistake again. It urged the rooting out of those peasants who had managed to get laboring jobs in the cities.
The OGPU documented the starvation in turgid accounts that nonetheless allow the reader some insights into the situation. Though some reports attribute starvation to failure to work sufficient hours or poor collective farm construction, others acknowledge that even those who had worked hard were starving.
One report from Kyiv region in late February 1933—based on 40% of the districts–noted that over 210,000 people were starving and an additional 12,800 had already died. In Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, the regional authorities proposed on February 28 to set up nurseries to feed 70,000 children, 50,000 pre-school-age children, and 300,000 adults.
The scale of the tragedy, in what had been the most productive grain-growing republic of both the Russian Empire and the 1920s USSR, is hard to fathom. The Italian Consul in Kharkiv (which remained Ukraine’s capital until 1934) reported that some 40-50 percent of peasants had died and estimated the death toll at around 9 million.
But we do not know the death toll. No one was counting the bodies, many of which lay for days unburied or were dumped into mass graves.
Starvation and repressions achieved one of Stalin’s expressed goals: to bring the errant Ukrainian republic into the Soviet fold. The policy of developing Ukrainian culture and language—initiated in the 1920s—was ended and its chief proponent, Mykola Skrypnyk, committed suicide in July 1933.
The Purges of the 1930s later removed practically all the perpetrators of the Famine at the republican level. Postyshev, Stalin’s local plenipotentiary, was executed in February 1939. The entire leadership of the Ukrainian Communist Party was eliminated. Depopulated villages were refilled with families from other regions. The Famine was then systematically concealed from the public and the outside world for the next 54 years.
The late James E. Mace called Ukraine a “post-genocidal society.” This is a pertinent epithet for “Eastern Ukraine,” or Soviet Ukraine as it existed in 1932-33, which never fully recovered and where present-day residents still have problems coming to terms with the crimes committed in 1932-33 because essentially this heartland of Ukraine was systematically “denationalized” and eradicated by the Soviet regime.
David R. Marples is author of Heroes and Villains: Creating National History in Contemporary Ukraine (Budapest and New York: Central European University Press, 2008).





Talking on the Unpleasant Topic of Caspian Development

24 11 2010


19.11.2010

Talking on the unpleasant topic

Arkady Dubnov

Dmitry Medvedev met with Ahmadinejad and other neighbors on the Caspian Sea

Medvedev drew attention to the danger of man-made disasters in the Caspian Sea as a result of pipeline construction on its bottom.Berdimuhamedov said that Moscow has no right to interfere with the construction of trans-Caspian pipe coming out of Russian waters …

A trip to Baku at the Caspian summit represented the third for Dmitry Medvedev possibly the only member of the Group of Eight meet with "the world’s pariah" – Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said recently that he is terminating the negotiations with the international community regarding Iran’s nuclear program. With thereby Ahmadinejad, who called the "sold his soul to the devil" who refused to supply Iran with S-300 systems. Since the Iranian president reacted to Moscow’s refusal to execute prisoners with Tehran a deal to sell anti-missile complexes, following the adoption of this summer, UN Security Council sanctions on Iran voted by, and Russia.

He talks. Medvedev and Ahmadinejad began with a smile. But after a rendezvous with the Russian president, the Iranian leader went sullen. Of course, any statements to the press was not. Shied away from them, and Mr. Medvedev, whom answered questions assistant for international affairs Sergei Prikhodko. He was laconic: "The conversation was of the open nature, the parties did not avoid hard questions." Obviously, what’s to reach a compromise was clearly more difficult than at the summit.

The problem of dividing the Caspian Sea among the five countries of the region as many years, how many years the sovereignty of most countries of the five, who are independent from the Soviet collapse. This event forced the start section of the once Soviet-Iranian Sea between the Islamic republic and the new littoral states – Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Russia and Turkmenistan. At the third summit of Caspian states held in Baku yesterday, many spoke of the need to accelerate the process of preparation of the Convention on the legal status of the Caspian Sea. It is this document should become final in the process of dividing the sea. And, it would seem, from the Baku summit is no sensationalism in this regard is not expected. Talking about the convention seemed to be completely duty. All were agreed that the need to meet more often. Presidents – once a year, as agreed at the second Caspian summit in Tehran in 2007, and the ad hoc working group on the level of deputy foreign ministers and the more frequently – up to five times a year (this suggestion the president of Iran one of my colleagues did not challenge).

But none of the leaders have not indicated the principal contradiction, which hinders the achievement of a compromise in the section of the Caspian Sea – are diametrically different approaches to the principles of this section. These approaches do not change for many years and is mainly shared by three countries – Iran, Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan. Thanks to the agreements signed between Russia, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan in the late 1990′s, the principles governing the mining, the lack of legal status of the sea does not care so much about first of all Moscow and Astana. They have for many years quite successfully master the oilfields on the Caspian Sea north.

Quite expected was made by Dmitry Medvedev, the observation that has not yet determined the legal status of the Caspian Sea, in force remains the same status under the Soviet-Iranian treaties (1921 and 1940). And, moreover, the Russian president to pre-empt attempts of taking unilateral steps designed to prevent the achievement of balance in the region to push the negotiation process on the new status. Medvedev also drew attention to the danger of man-made disasters in the Caspian Sea as a result of pipeline construction on its bottom. He recalled the crash in the Gulf of Mexico and talked about his own initiative, made by him within the G20, the strengthening of the responsibility for the work of this kind.

No other presidents "pipeline" topic in this vein did not raise. All the other Caspian countries, except Iran, one way or another are interested in laying oil and gas pipelines through the Caspian Sea. And, moreover, consider the position of Moscow as an attempt to prevent the search for alternative routes for its hydrocarbons to international markets.Not surprisingly in this regard and others: President of Turkmenistan Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov fairly rigidly stated that pipelines can be carried out only with the consent of the countries for which the waters of the pipeline. In other words, in Ashgabat believe that Moscow has no right to interfere with the construction of trans-Caspian pipe coming out of the Russian Caspian Sea.

But all these speeches were heard at the plenary session of the summit. When presidents take some time out to sign the final documents, we found that a majority of five Caspian reached a compromise in the quest as soon as possible to finish work on the Convention on the legal status. Moreover, President Nazarbayev, apparently on the Rights of the Dean of the Caspian Sea talks, announced that the president gave an indication of their experts for a year to prepare a draft convention in order to sign it on Russian territory. Dmitry Medvedev, in his closing remarks, nothing to do but only express the hope that in the near future at a meeting in Moscow would be "set point" in this case. Thus, it accurately marked the place and about the next, fourth, the Caspian summit. It was also observed in the final statement of the Baku meeting.

Toward the close of the summit became aware of another "protocol decision" – to instruct the relevant authorities within three months to prepare proposals on the mechanism of introducing a 5-year moratorium on sturgeon fishing in Caspian Sea. This initiative was announced in Baku by Nazarbayev. Also decided to request within three months to agree on the width of the zone on the basis of the national 24-25 nautical miles, the outer limits of which will be the state’s borders.

As a result, the Baku summit was very productive. The prospect of an early conclusion of a convention on the Caspian status inspired usually not too talkative Turkmen President expressed that, well, then we can think of a trans-Caspian gas pipeline. Of course, he added Berdimuhamedov, as if responding to the concerns of the Russian president, subject to compliance with all environmental requirements.

Another indication of the impact of the summit was the signing of the Baku Agreement on Security Cooperation in the Caspian Sea. Dmitry Medvedev called it a "landmark event". We note that this is fixed "the exclusive prerogative of the Caspian states to address the whole range of issues concerning regional security," the Russian president in detail to substantiate this thesis. "Only we and no one else reserves the right to it – said Medvedev – and if we weaken the interaction in this area, you can be sure there will be others there is strength."

The Russian president also reminded of its proposal to establish a Caspian Economic Cooperation Organization, but the implementation of this idea has not yet met with enthusiasm among his colleagues.

Channel:: News Time





Russia lost to Turkmenistan

24 11 2010


Russia lost to Turkmenistan

Sergei Rasova

Something happened that should not happen.Russia lost its influence in Turkmenistan, a gas pipeline under the Caspian will be laid.

By and large, but what could I do Berdimuhamedov? Dioxide – the main export component of the republic, its a lot, it should sell.

Russia is not enough that she refused to buy larger volumes of gas, so more and continues to put "sand in the wheels" deliveries of Turkmen gas to European consumers. For the time Turkmenistan reconciled with a similar approach, and patiently waited for the offer, Gazprom in exchange for support from the denial of "Nabucco"? So do not wait, besides threatening statements the Russians that they will not allow construction of gas pipelines on Caspian seabed. That is, in fact, around these issues and turned summit of Caspian littoral states, which last week took place in Baku.

No doubt there were other questions too important and topical, but rather it questions the second plan, but mainly as I was, and remained the question of the legal status of the Caspian Sea and the principles of his section. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the emergence of newly independent states with access to the Caspian Sea, the problem was not solved. At a forum in Baku tentatively agreed that experts should agree on the national coastal zone, on the basis of 24-25 miles, the outer limits of which will become the state’s borders. Although the same Turkmenistan insists on a width of 20 miles. Secondly, we must distinguish between the economic zones of responsibility of States. Here too there is no complete unanimity. Previously, when was the Soviet Union, the two countries, respectively, in equal parts divide the Caspian Sea – the USSR and Iran. Now proposed principle: the greater length of coastline, the larger sector of the sea get to the state. In May 2003, Kazakhstan, Russia and Azerbaijan have adopted a tripartite agreement to separate about 2 / 3 of the Caspian seabed. Now actually in Kazakhstan 27 percent of the seabed, to Russia – 19 percent of Azerbaijan – 18 percent. Iran, this approach does not suit, and he proposes to divide the Caspian equally by 20 percent between the five countries. What is clear Iran has the smallest length of the coastline, and want, if not more, not less than their neighbors, but it is unacceptable for Turkmenistan or Azerbaijan, or for other Caspian states. Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to the summit in Baku said that progress in determining the status of the Caspian Sea there and if the experts will work productively, then a year later in Moscow, a document can be signed.

As a result of this forum have signed an Agreement on Cooperation in the field of security in the Caspian Sea and agreed that the need to give time for sturgeon reproduction. This was the initiative of President Nursultan Nazarbayev for a moratorium on sturgeon fishing, however, until the instrument is not signed, but it will cook.

However, as we have already noted, the central issue of the Caspian – oil, gas, and Turkmenistan, respectively, laying the Trans-Caspian pipeline on the seabed in the direction of Azerbaijan. We have already detailed coverage of all the troubles in the relationship of gas main players in the region (see "Gas intrigue Turkmenistan), and therefore only briefly recall that Turkmenistan actively building a pipeline of the East-West", which will link the north-eastern gas fields in the country with the Caspian region .Then the Turkmen gas would go or on the Caspian gas pipeline through Kazakhstan to Russia, or the Trans-Caspian gas pipeline system in the Russians an alternative Nabucco pipeline. During the recent visit of Dmitry Medvedev to Ashkhabad, according to Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin, the outcome of the negotiations was the decision to once again postpone the construction of the Caspian gas pipeline. They say, Europe after the crisis was not recovered, demand for gas is not. Given that "the Caspian Sea region is dependent, then the Turkmens had nothing to do but to face the Trans-Caspian project, through the Caucasus to Turkey (joining the existing Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum), and further to Europe.

President Berdimuhamedov at the summit in Baku, clearly explained that he was "against giving any outstanding issues on the Caspian political overtones" and that "for us is the fundamental issue of building a pipeline under the Caspian Sea." In this case, the head of Turkmenistan does not intend to ask permission to lay the pipeline from all countries of the Caspian "five", and only those parties "across the bottom areas that will build such a pipeline, that is Azerbaijan. Supplemented his boss, Vice-Premier of Turkmenistan in Ashgabat Baymurad Hodzhamuratov Forum "Oil and Gas of Turkmenistan – 2010". According to him, Turkmenistan will be able to deliver to Europe to 40 billion cubic meters of gas. He added that the construction of the Trans-Caspian gas pipeline under the Caspian Sea "consistent with the policy of Turkmenistan to diversify the areas of marketing natural gas."In other words, Moscow made it clear that she was not entitled to decide to build or not build "Transcaspian" as pipe will go out of the Russian Caspian Sea.

Thus Berdimuhamedov said Medvedev, who insisted that "the necessary strict balance between the interests of oil production and gas production, as well as environmental protection. Including issues such as the laying of main trans-Caspian pipelines. Clearly, all these questions about the ecology of the evil one, the problem is that Gazprom with its South Stream may remain on the beans.

What will happen next, this is perhaps the most interesting question. It is likely that Russia will insist – to build nothing is impossible, the status of the Caspian Sea are not resolved.Quietly tries to win over the other side of the Caspian states to the accompaniment of an "information war": it is said, will earn "Transcaspian" come the Americans and Europeans will begin to dictate their terms, the regional security will be threatened.

This raises another question, and who will support the Moscow if building the Trans-Caspian pipeline will "in fact" – without agreeing with Moscow or Iran, which strongly opposed. Of course, Azerbaijan’s position in this matter, as the grandfather Lenin – paramount. However, if Azerbaijan will settle disputes with Turkmenistan on offshore Kyapaz, Azeri and Chirag fields, (for example, sign an agreement on joint development of fields that are in the disputed zone), it is unlikely to act on the side of the Russians.Unprofitable, and the West in Azerbaijan good relations.

Hopes for Iran, too, especially not to, after Russia refused to supply missile systems S-300 relationship soured, and the second is already supplying its gas Turkmenistan Islamic republic. Why, for example, does not reduce the price of gas in return for loyalty? In addition, Iran is a rogue nation and a special weight in international politics has not, and the set of enemies along the perimeter of its borders will not.

Kazakhstan has traditionally hide "head in the sand and take a stand – neutrality. He had no hands with anyone quarrel with either the West or with Russia or with Turkmenistan.And the future is possible and its gas to Nabucco to pump if the Turkmens will succeed.

Who loses? Sure, only Russia. About the transit of Central Asian gas to the West will be forgotten, we observe because of their own short-sighted policy, because of the inability to negotiate and compromise. Loss than image hundreds of billions of dollars, and the question arises – how then will need Russia’s South Stream project. Would not that from him would have to give. Be realistic, after Moscow has reduced the purchase of up to 10-12 billion cubic meters of Turkmen gas, Ashgabat leverage to influence it had not left …

Today Turkmenistan is increasing gas supplies to China, puts on a gas pipeline in Afghanistan, Pakistan and India (TAPI) is actively working with Iran. In late November or early December, the Caspian region is planning to visit European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, to lobby for the Nabucco project, so it will continue to follow all the ups and downs of the Caspian gas detective.

Source:: Ca-News





Saakashvili Pledged Georgia To Political Solution With Russia

24 11 2010

Saakashvili promised not to fight with Russia

Mikhail Saakashvili

Saakashvili said that Tbilisi have made every effort to start a direct dialogue with Moscow

Georgia Will Not use the Military Option to Resolve Conflicts. This WAS stated by the President of Georgia Mikheil Saakashvili, speaking at a session of the European Parliament in Strasbourg.

The Georgian President also appealed to the leadership of the Russian Federation to start political talks.

"We are interested in beginning serious negotiations with the Russian leadership … Georgia stands with a unilateral initiative to never use force to restore its territorial integrity, despite the fact that currently almost one fifth of the country is occupied by Russian troops," – said Mikheil Saakashvili.

Saakashvili said that "even if Russia refuses to withdrawal of occupying troops, if the occupying troops would double the violation of human rights, Georgia, reserve a right to defend in the event of an attack on those 80% of the territory controlled by the Georgian government. "

Earlier in an interview with French newspaper Figaro, Georgian President announced his intention to "reach out" to Russia.

Battleground

He said that the intention to abandon the use of force in case of attack on Georgia dalas Georgian leadership is not easy.

We’re not going to take up arms to resist the aggressors

Mikhail Saakashvili
President of Georgia

"This – the controversial initiative, because any country has the right and duty to fight, including with the help of the army to defend its sovereignty", – Saakashvili said.

As an example he cited the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan

"Afghanistan ousted the Soviet occupiers, – he said – but the country was destroyed and its problems have remained. Georgia should become a country of European and contemporary. It is impossible to have ended the same things in Afghanistan and Chechnya."

Problems with Russia, Saakashvili sees that in his opinion, "Georgia has been a battleground in the confrontation between Russia and the West, US and NATO. It’s for them (Russia) was a way to continue the cold war – he said.

Direct dialogue

According to Saakashvili, in Tbilisi have taken every effort to start a direct dialogue with the Russian side. "

"But every time we offered a dialogue, then got in a rather rigid form of denial. Now I can only hope for the moral authority of the European Parliament to unilaterally declare the refusal to use force. In any case, we’re not going to take up arms to to resist the aggressors, "- said Mikheil Saakashvili, in an interview with Figaro.

According to the president of Georgia, "as his country can not change geography, then she should find a way to negotiate with Russia", – added the President of Georgia.

After the war, in August 2008, Russian leaders have repeatedly said that they will never meet or something to discuss with Saakashvili.

"With the current leadership of Georgia, we do not talk about anything" – reaffirmed the Interfax a source in the Foreign Ministry.

The agency’s interlocutor said that, among other things, no official request from the Georgian side in Moscow have been reported.





Columbian Interview With Yar Klein

23 11 2010

Mercenary sentenced

JUSTICE Manizales Superior Court sentenced him to 10 years in prison for Yair Klein, an Israeli who trained paramilitaries in the 80′s. WEEK spoke to him.

Monday March 18, 2002

At 55 Gal retired Col. Yair Klein, a veteran of the Yom Kippur War and former instructor of Israeli army officers, had to withdraw from the adventurous life that gave him fame beyond the borders of Israel and can not return to leave their country. If the military of 1.75 meters, 90 kilos of weight, gray hair and blue eyes, set foot abroad run the risk of being extradited to Colombia. Here awaits you in jail because a few months ago the High Court of Manila was sentenced to 10 years and eight months in prison, plus payment of 22 minimum wages, for the strengthening and practical training in military and paramilitary terrorism. Klein was convicted along with two of his men, Abraham Tzedaka Melnik and Terry, who also acted as instructors. Klein shot to fame in June 1989 when a television news showed pictures of the courses that had been issued, along with his companions, the paramilitaries operating in the Magdalena Medio.

However, the Israeli military responded to WEEK from his residence in the port of Jaffa, which today lives in an old Arab house on four floors, that his initial purpose was not that. He maintains that when he came home in 1987 his intention was to ensure that your company hired Police, Speardhead to train its members in matters of defense and security. Your contact on that first trip was Izhack Shoshany Meraioth, the representative of a security equipment firm in Israel. At that time Klein said that he stayed at the Hotel Country 85 and met with Gen. Carlos Arturo Casadiego police and with representatives from the Atlas Security. In his first two visits a week spent in Colombia. The other two, he says, "were longer because it was when I was hired to teach courses in Puerto Boyacá.
The training team Speardhead issued, in addition to the aforementioned characters also included Picciotto Arik Afek, was too ‘professional’. In the summary of research to condemn the Israelis know that the courses are held in the school’s fifty in the swamp Palagua and rural areas of the municipality of Puerto Boyacá. Klein says today from the comfort of your home that "the training was military and defense and in no way a crime or murders (…) I trained farmers and farm people who continually trampling guerrillas without the Army could do something for their rights. "
The version of the Colombian authorities, according to the indictment of the process is very different.The first course gave the Israeli of Romanian descent, it was self-defense. The second was much more offensive and the third made the 20 ‘students’ who took it in experts in handling explosives. The best students were lieutenants of the great lords and the file are referred to by their nicknames: ‘Trap’, ‘Sausage’ and ‘Fercho. " In research papers concludes that "there is certainty as to the trained personnel they have committed serious attacks on our country through the knowledge received by their instructors, as the attack on the Homeland Security Department, DAS, the attack that he killed Antonio Roldán Betancur, governor of Antioquia, the journalist Jorge Enrique Pulido, the newspaper El Espectador and many other serious terrorist events of dye in the country. "
After training some of the men who then terrorized right and left in Colombia, Klein worked with who wanted to overthrow Panamanian Gen. Augusto Noriega and end your adventurous wanderings led him to Africa. They wanted to buy a diamond mine and get rich. Some media sources said in 1999 that the military had tried to negotiate with stones and precious woods in Zambia and Namibia. They got to hear from him in Sierra Leone, where he eventually went to jail in mid-2000. The authorities put him in Freetown, the capital of this country, accused of trying to defraud the government on the purchase of a helicopter of the Russian war. He says he got out alive by a miracle, but lost everything, including his diamond mine.
Today this man, who was born in Kibbutz Nizanim and separated from his wife Hava, a partner in a company car shielding and dreams of creating a school of survival in extreme conditions. "A kind of recreational park," says this soldier of fortune who despite all his past is defined as a family man worried about his four children, who are between 21 and 35. The escalating war between Israel and Palestine made to increase the profits of your business, but has no way to enjoy them out of their nation. The last one tried to leave behind hit him in the port of Jaffa and became a prisoner of his own land.
"I did not feel I did anything against the law"
WEEKLY: What was the reason to return to Colombia in late 1988 or early 1989?
Yair Klein: I was in Bogota to meet Shoshany Izhack Meraioth, who was representing a security equipment firm in Israel and had long lived in the country. I had talked about people Uraba banana groups who were besieged by guerrillas and wanted to do a string of security within its banana and through it found a security complex in the area. This meeting was not finally carried out. Meraioth organized another meeting, I suggested that they, in Puerto Boyaca, with ACDEGAM farmers were also suffering from the same reasons. And so I came to this region to develop self-defense groups.Ranchers and farmers who do not put up with the guerrillas.
WEEKLY: Did you leave your country to share military information to civilians in other countries?
YK: My team asked permission of the Israeli Defense Ministry and informed them that there was no need for authorization because the civilians would be trained to defend their property and place of work, not military. However, after the government of Israel was afraid of possible reprisals by the guerrillas against Jewish families in Colombia.
WEEK: "He knew he was training illegal paramilitary groups?
YK: Neither I nor my colleagues can say with certainty that those who train did not belong to paramilitary groups. Just know that there were many victims of the guerrillas.
WEEKLY: Did you meet members of the Medellin cartel, the likes of Pablo Escobar, Gonzalo Rodriguez Gacha or alias Vladimir, as did the courses?
YK: I did not know any of them. The only person with whom I had sex and was connected with drug trafficking was Bita name. Of Israel informed me that was on this road and then cut all ties with him.Nor am I aware of having met ‘Vladimir’. The army and the police were aware of what we were doing and the place was surrounded by military bases. During the weekends the students played football with the soldiers. From one of these bases came after a request for assistance from one of the courses in order to contain a guerrilla attack. I did not feel I did anything against the law, as you will understand I am a foreigner and they do not speak the language, so it could not know in detail how things worked there.
WEEK: He is accused of having trained people who caused the explosion of an Avianca plane in Cali …
YK: I heard that made me responsible for this but it’s crazy. It is said that Bosnia’s partisans helped and even participated in the attack. Spanish investigators came to Israel to talk to me. I was also charged with the death of a man (Luis Carlos) Galán, presidential candidate of that country. The first commission of inquiry said Galán was assassinated with 9 mm bullets, and the second commission found after two months that the bullets came from a Galil rifle and were of 5.56 mm caliber. The weapon in question was in Antigua ready for service in the invasion of Panama. Apparently the weapon came to Colombia at the hands of arms dealers Panamanians.
WEEK: "Then what do you attribute the reaction brought its presence in Colombia?
YK: The issue erupted and turned to advertising by the Americans. Around the same time I was hired to support the government in exile in Panama in order to topple the Noriega regime. Eduardo Herrera who was the commander of Panama before the revolution, was also an ambassador of Panama in Israel and security minister of the government in exile with the ousted president. United States took over the economic side, the proof is the first two checks in my possession and that came from Washington. The truth is that when the Senate gave the OK to the soldiers for the invasion of Panama no longer needed my services. I did not give up my fee and was in Miami when they broke the case of Colombia. The Americans found it very comfortable to harm Israeli interests in Colombia because the Colombian began purchasing Israeli weapons, around 250 million dollars annually.
WEEK: How is your legal status in Israel?
YK: I never had a process in Israel for this reason, it never got a test that could actually prove that I trained the Medellin cartel. But I was convicted for using military knowledge without permission and had a fine. Israel prosecutes persons not complying with the law in other countries. No banishes their citizens who are outside the law but the judges house. I am willing to be tried in Israel and I am willing to testify before the Colombian authorities at the embassy of Colombia. I have nothing to hide. Do not think there is any evidence in Colombia can blame me either there or in any other nation in the world.





Yair Klein and other extraditable

23 11 2010

Yair Klein and other extraditable

By Alfredo Rangel

This case recalls that of the three Irishmen, James Monaghan, Martin McCauley and Niall Connally, convicted in absentia of training the FARC.

Saturday 28 August 2010

It is very commendable attitude of the government of Russia to seize and prepare to Colombia to extradite a fugitive from justice our Yair Klein. Hopefully other governments have the same arrangement with the Colombian justice system to arrest and extradite fugitives to the three Irishmen were convicted here instructing the FARC terrorist tactics.

As is known, Yair Klein was sentenced in absentia to ten years in prison by a judge in Manila for training irregular groups then funded by Pablo Escobar and Gonzalo Rodriguez Gacha, including drug lords. These bands then bloodied the country. But the Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, echoing the national and international NGOs that unfairly accuse the Colombian State to be a massive and systematic violator of human rights ruled that Russia could not extradite Klein to Colombia because his life was in danger and could be subjected to torture and mistreatment by our government officials.
Definitely, no one knows who she works: Mr. Klein, who sponsored the violation of human rights in Colombia, now relies on the arguments of the NGOs advocating for human rights, to prevent the Colombian judicial action against him. However, the Russian government said that Klein failed to prove the risk he would if he were extradited. Moreover, the Colombian Foreign Ministry has said that Klein would be held in maximum security prison Cómbita, Boyacá, which according to the UN has the highest qualifying for the protection of human rights. Hopefully, then, that the Strasbourg Court will grant more credit to legitimate governments that certain NGOs and proceed to the extradition of Klein.
This case recalls that of the three Irishmen, James Monaghan, Martin McCauley and Niall Connaly, who in absentia after his escape, were sentenced in December 2004 on appeal by the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Bogota, having trained for five weeks to the FARC in the manufacture of explosives and use of unconventional weapons. This training included the development and use of the infamous bomb cylinders with the FARC destroyed dozens of public buildings and hundreds of humble homes in dozens of rural villages, leading to massacres like Bojaya in Chocó. According to BBC News, Irish, members of the IRA, using Colombia as a testing ground to test new weapons and explosives. And according to British security forces quoted by the Sunday Telegraph, these subjects were rehearsing in Colombia a "super equivalent of a small nuclear explosion that could kill hundreds of people and destroying a bunker." (Eduardo Mackenzie, The FARC, a terrorist failure, pg. 491). But the trial judge acquitted them for lack of evidence (how strange, no?), Accepting their argument that they were doing "ecotourism." And while the ruling was the second instance, it flew.
The terrorist mission in Colombia was authorized by the leaders of the IRA at the time they conducted peace talks with the British government. And apparently this was a covert operation to fund, with resources from the FARC drug trafficking, kidnapping and other criminal acts, political campaigns of Sinn Fein, political wing of the IRA. In fact, Martin McCauley, one of the three men in Colombia, was campaign director for Sinn Fein (Loretta Napoleoni, Jihad, p.. 85). At the time, the Colombian prosecutors issued an international arrest warrant against the three men, but support for terrorism of the FARC was covert under the IRA peace agreements with the British government. And so we stayed up until today, no truth, no justice, no repair. But no NGO has called for it.
Yair Klein’s extradition would be a good precedent for other governments to address the claims of Colombia and we handed over a first world city fugitive from justice who walks our free and unpunished by the planet, then to have supported terrorist brutality here . It would be proof that the vaunted global justice is not just for those of poncho. For this reason there are a handful of foreigners extraditable.





The Career of Carlos Castano: A Marriage of Drugs and Politics

23 11 2010

The Career of Carlos Castano:

A Marriage of Drugs and Politics

August 2001

Carlos Castaño’s criminal career spans almost twenty years. It encapsulates the involvement by important sectors of the Colombian army in a Dirty War that originated with President Betancur’s 1982 peace overtures to the guerrillas, and has since frustrated the efforts of four other Colombian governments to find a negotiated solution to the guerilla insurgency.
Castaño’s story begins in the most geographically strategic and resource-rich region of Colombia, known as the Magdalena Medio. He was 16 years old when, in 1982, he and his older brother Fidel, now allegedly dead, joined an army-sponsored "self-defense" group, "MAS" — "Muerte a Secuestradores," (Death to Kidnappers). Motivated to avenge the killing of their father by the FARC, the Castaño brothers received their military training from the Bombona Battalion of the army’s 14th Brigade, based in Puerto Berrio in the Magdalena Medio. Carlos enlisted as a civilian "army guide" and informant, attached to 14th Brigade forces.
The "MAS" provided the model for all the regional "Self Defense groups" that proliferated around the country in the ’80s and ’90s, and that were transformed into a national force, united under Castaño’s command, in l997, when he organized the AUC. Set up by a consortium of wealthy Magdalena Medio political and business leaders and cattle ranchers to protect themselves and their property from the guerillas, "MAS" took its name and inspiration from a Medellín death squad, formed a year earlier by drug baron Pablo Escobar, and "self defense" had little to do with its activities. After receiving their training, "MAS" members were quickly incorporated into army operations and set out to "cleanse" the Magdalena Medio region of suspected "subversives," a code word that applied to anyone critical of the army or their far right supporters, or who sought to promote then President Betancur’s peace overtures to the guerrillas.
Through the ’80s, Pablo Escobar and his associates bought vast tracts of land in the Magdalena Medio. Establishing a pattern that has not altered, drug money flowed to the "MAS," the death squads flourished, and by 1986, some 1,000 Magdalena Medio peasants had been killed and tens of thousands forcibly displaced to clear the land for the traffickers. Civic and community leaders, trade unionists, Indian leaders, opposition politicians, priests, human rights defenders, and journalists, also became victims of the irregular, regional war.
In 1987, with support from army officers, the traffickers imported foreign mercenaries from Israel and Britain to run a death squad school in the Magdalena Medio to impart the skills of the Israeli Special Forces and the British S.A.S. to the Colombian death squads. Retired Israeli army colonel, Yair Klein (last heard of in June 2000, when he was sprung from jail in Sierra Leone) transformed the peasant militias of the MAS into a professional killing machine. Reputedly, Carlos Castaño was Klein’s star pupil. By then, he and his older brother Fidel were paramilitary leaders in their own right. They had their own 150-man paramilitary army, "Los Tangueros," and ruled a fiefdom in the northern state of Córdoba from which they trafficked drugs, conducted a war in the banana fields of coastal Uraba that put one small guerilla faction, (the EPL) out of business, and perfected the art of parlaying services — protection, intelligence, and high-ticket assassinations — to create alliances, first with Pablo Escobar, then with the Cali Cartel.
According to official investigators, the Castaño brothers left their finger prints all over the raging political and drug violence of those years. Among the crimes committed on Escobar’s behalf, Carlos Castaño has been charged with the bombing an Avianca plane that blew up in Colombian skies with 111 passengers on board. The Castaño brothers also provided the guns and the expertise for most of the killings that eliminated the left-wing Unión Patriótica Party, that had emerged from President Betancur’s peace talks with the FARC in 1984. They are also charged with the assassination of two left-wing presidential candidates in the 1990 elections. Fidel Castaño built a network, based around drugs, right-wing politics, and army connections, with some of the wealthiest, most powerful men in the country. That network has survived to protect younger brother Carlos until today.
In 1993, after falling out with Escobar, the Castaño brothers switched allegiances. With funding from the rival Cali Cartel, they formed a 50-man death squad, "Los Pepes" (People Persecuted by Pablo Escobar). Before long, Los Pepes had become indispensable allies of official efforts led by the CIA’s Delta Search Force, in collaboration with the Colombian narcotics police and the DEA, to track and kill the fugitive Escobar.
By the mid-nineties, after the mysterious disappearance of Fidel, Carlos Castaño was back on the northern coast at the head of a new paramilitary force, the "Self-Defense Groups of Córdoba and Uraba" (the ACCU). Sponsored by wealthy landowners, and supported by the army’s 17th Brigade, the ACCU fought a savage Dirty War to drive the FARC from Uraba, and consolidated Castaño’s control over an expanding personal fiefdom in Córdoba and northern Antioquia.
In 1997, Castaño brought Colombia’s dozen or so regional paramilitaries under his military and political leadership to form the AUC. At the AUC’s National Congress, held in Antioquia in August 1999 and attended by civilian and military advisors, the blueprint was drawn up for the formation of a new, national socialist political and military movement, and the decision was adopted to campaign by all possible means for political recognition of the AUC.





Army of terror: the legacy of US-backed human rights abuses in Colombia.

23 11 2010

Army of terror: the legacy of US-backed human rights abuses in Colombia.

 

http://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/30075547.html#

Harvard International Review –  Winter, 1998

PETER SANTINA, Staff Writer, Harvard International Review

After three decades of civil war, Colombia is finally approaching peace. On August 7, 1998, Andres Pastrana assumed the presidency, replacing the discredited Ernesto Samper. The country’s two largest guerrilla armies, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and the National Liberation Army (ELN), had refused to meet with Samper because he received US$6 million in campaign contributions from the Cali drug cartel. The Pastrana administration has moved quickly toward negotiations with the guerrillas, agreeing to the FARC’s demand to demilitarize an area the size of Switzerland in southern Colombia for 90 days while the two sides negotiate. Pastrana was elected by the most votes in his nation’s history and has established a much more cordial relationship with the United States than his predecessor, making the first Colombian presidential visit to the United States in 23 years. President Bill Clinton and Pastrana signed a joint agreement to fight the drug trade, and Clinton promised US$280 million more in US aid to Colombia.

Since his election, however, Pastrana’s popularity in the polls has fallen nearly to the level of Samper’s, due to an enormous amount of social unrest. Mounting opposition to the government’s plans to cut public spending with privatization reforms manifested itself in a three-week national strike of 800,000 Colombian state employees. The strike, which ended on October 27, resulted in the death of seven union leaders. This tragedy highlights the key to Colombia’s human rights catastrophe: political murders. Unions are targeted by right-wing paramilitaries for their opposition to the power of business, especially multinational corporations. According to the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions, in 1997 alone 156 trade unionists were killed in Colombia. Although unions are one target of political violence, peasants living in the countryside have suffered even more. Brutal paramilitary forces target those suspected of collaboration with the guerrillas and have committed numerous human rights abuses. This relationship between the official military and the death squads has been investigated by the US State Department, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, international think tanks, and human rights non-governmental organizations (NGOs), including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.

Government Abuses

According to the US State Department, “the [Colombian] Government took no significant action to restrain these powerful paramilitary groups” in 1997. A major factor in the abuse is indeed the complicity of the Colombian government, particularly the armed forces, in the rightist agenda of the paramilitaries in the face of a growing leftist guerrilla movement. The Colombian government, threatened by the socialist rebels, has been unwilling to prosecute either paramilitaries or army soldiers for their human rights abuses because they are more concerned with losing power to the socialist rebels than protecting the basic human rights of Colombian citizens.

General Bedoya, the commander of the armed forces, has said that military courts effectively punish violators, citing a high overall conviction rate for military violations. When asked by Human Rights Watch, however, he could not cite a single conviction for a human rights violation; most military tribunal convictions are for technical offenses such as failure to follow orders. A detailed report on Colombian human rights abuses released by Human Rights Watch in 1998 states that in cases of humanitarian law violations, “allegations against officers are rarely investigated.” The US State Department noted in its 1997 report that, “at year’s end, the military exercised jurisdiction over many cases of military personnel accused of abuses, a system that has established an almost unbroken record of impunity.” The Colombian National Police, although it has improved its record since 1994, continues to show a reluctance to prosecute paramilitaries. According to the Attorney General, the National Police have not addressed over 200 warrants for the arrest of paramilitaries.

Problems with the military and human rights, however, extend beyond a lack of prosecution for abuses. The State Department’s Colombia Country Report on Human Rights Practices for 1997 blamed government forces for “numerous serious abuses,” including extra-judicial killings, forced disappearances, and the torturing and beating of some detainees. On July 29, 1998, President Samper publicly apologized to the families of 49 people murdered by government agents between 1991 and 1993. In each of the state massacres mentioned by Samper, defendants accused of responsibility were absolved by military tribunals until the human rights branch of the Organization of American States found the Colombian government liable for the deaths. Samper conducted a similar ceremony in 1995, in which he accepted government blame for military sweeps through the town of Trujillo in 1989 and 1990 that left 107 peasant leaders and activists dead.

Paramilitary Terrorism

These crimes pale in comparison, however, to those of the brutal paramilitary forces. In the first nine months of 1997, 69 percent of the 3,500 political murders in Colombia could be attributed to right-wing paramilitary groups, according to the US State Department. Death squads continue to roam the Colombian countryside, terrorizing peasants who they suspect of sympathizing with the guerrillas. On October 25, seven trucks of about 100 paramilitary troops entered the northeastern city of San Carlos. They killed ten civilians and abducted 15 others who were on their blacklist of alleged guerrilla collaborators, and left graffiti condemning Pastrana’s overtures of peace toward the guerrillas. Later that same day, other paramilitaries invaded the town of Altos del Rosario and murdered 11 residents.

Unfortunately, this is not simply a recent phenomenon–the Colombian government and armed forces have a long history of cooperation with the death squads. In 1968, the Colombian government legalized the organization and promotion of groups of armed civilians, known as “peasant self-defense groups,” in the context of the growing guerrilla movement. These small private armies were equipped, trained, and logistically supported by the armed forces. The political and economic elites who felt threatened by the guerrillas were particularly supportive of these “self-defense” groups, as they are of the paramilitary forces in Colombia today. These groups were eventually banned in 1989, because of their inneither established procedures to break up the paramilitary groups that they had created, nor did it cut them off from future aid from the armed forces.

Perhaps the most prominent Colombian paramilitary figure is Carlos Castano, who traces his first involvement in paramilitary activity to the training he received in the Bombona Battalion of the armed forces in the early 1980s, when the military, business owners, and ranchers formed the activist group Death to Kidnappers (MAS). By 1983, Colombian internal affairs had registered over 240 political killings by the MAS death squad, whose victims included elected officials, farmers, and community leaders. In his report, Internal Affairs Chief Carlos Jimenez Gomez identified 59 active-duty members of the police and military who belonged to MAS, including the commander of the army’s Bombon Battalion.

The government again contributed to the formation of paramilitary groups in 1994, when it established “special private security and vigilante services” whose members were allowed to arm themselves in self-defense. According to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, known paramilitaries participate in these “Convivir” associations. The Office of the Superintendent of Private Vigilante and Security Groups admitted in November 1997 that it was incapable of fulfilling its responsibility to oversee these legal, state-supported paramilitary organizations. Members continue to be investigated on charges of homicide, torture, and other grave human rights abuses by the government.

The massacre of May 16, 1998, in Barrancabermeja is a clear example of the friendly relationship between the military and the paramilitaries. Camilo Aurelio Morantes, the head of the paramilitary Autodefensas de Santander y Sur del Cesar (AUSAC), has admitted to ordering the attack on Barrancabermeja, which left 32 civilians dead. Morantes is known by the army and the government to be a paramilitary leader, yet he has not been prosecuted for his leading role in the massacre. Furthermore, witnesses have alleged that soldiers waved the paramilitaries through the army check-point while entering and leaving Barrancabermeja. The government investigated the role of ten of the soldiers involved, and the only one detained was an Army corporal who was charged for personally participating in the massacre. A humanitarian worker in Antioquia told Human Rights Watch, “I can’t count the number of times I’ve been stopped at a joint army-paramilitary roadblock. The soldiers are there with their green uniforms and the paramilitaries with their blue uniforms. It’s like different units of the same army.”

US Military Aid

The United States provides a great amount of support for the Colombian armed forces despite its abusive track record. First, the United States continues to train Colombian military officers at both the US Army School of the Americas (SOA) at Fort Benning and the Special Warfare Center at Fort Bragg. Representative Joseph Kennedy and the Washington Office on Latin America jointly released a report in July 1998 documenting the specific abuses of Colombian graduates of the School of the Americas.

Before the report was released, a video was shown of Colombian soldiers beating unarmed farmers participating in a peaceful protest and then attacking cameraman Richard Velez, who suffered serious internal injuries. The soldiers were operating under the command of SOA graduate Nestor Ramirez. Another SOA graduate, General Hernan Jose Guzman Rodriguez, was dismissed in November 1994 to improve the armed forces’ public image. Guzman protected and supported the death squad MAS between 1987 and 1990, during which time it was responsible for at least 147 murders. In 1986, Guzman commanded soldiers who detained, tortured, gang raped, and executed a Colombian woman and then invented a story that she had committed suicide by shooting herself in the nape of her neck. Guzman’s portrait has hung in the SOA “Hall of Fame” in Ft. Benning since 1993. A final example is Captain Gilberto Ibarra, SOA class of 1983, who forced three peasant children to walk in front of his patrol and detonate mines, killing two of them and seriously wounding the other.

Page 1 2 Next »




Zionist torturers and Colombian oligarchs–(Yair Klien and MAS Death Squads)

23 11 2010

Zionist torturers and Colombian oligarchs

NorteAmericanos_for_Bolivar
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 14:44:30 -0800

A connection between the Israeli Military man Yair Klien and the Colombian Death Squads.
A deadly union of Zionist torturers and Colombian oligarchs.
NorteAmericanos for Bolivar
—– Original Message —–

Subject: Colombia’s Paramilitaries and Israel
New World Phalange, Colombia’s Paramilitaries and Israel
by Jeremy Bigwood
December 04, 2002

“I copied the concept of paramilitary forces from the Israelis.”

Carlos Castaño, Mi Confesión 2002[1]

In 1983, an intense 18-year-old Colombian arrived in Israel to take a yearlong course called “562.”[2] He was no normal foreign exchange student.  His name was Carlos Castaño and the course was about making war, something that he would exceed at:  he was destined to become the most adept and ruthless paramilitary leader in Latin America’s history.

Carlos Castaño had been impelled along this vengeful path after his cattle-ranching father had been killed during a botched rescue attempt by the army while being held for a “tax” ransom by the FARC – Colombia’s strongest left-wing guerrilla army.[3]  Bitter over their father’s death, Carlos and his older brother, Fidel, vowed revenge, a vengeance that would dovetail with both the interests of the Colombian right-wing landholding classes and US foreign policy. It is a vengeance that continues into the present..

The brothers first offered their services as scouts for the Colombian Army’s Bombona Battalion – fingering FARC sympathizers, providing intelligence and even participating in military operations.  But Fidel – some 14 years older than Carlos – concluded that by merely working for the army, they were going to get nowhere.[4]  One of the battalion’s majors introduced them to a local paramilitary death squad called “Caruso,” with whom they started a killing spree.  When local police started to investigate them, they found it necessary to operate even more clandestinely.  Unlike in many other third-world countries under the U.S.’s shadow, Colombia’s police and judiciary have sometimes played an independent role from the Army.

Later, according to press reports,[5] Fidel started his own paramilitary death squad called “Los Tangueros,” named after his ranch, “Las Tangas.”[6]  The Los Tangueros was responsible for more than 150 murders during the late 1980s and early 1990s.  When discussing this period in his book, Castaño openly talks about murders he has committed or ordered, making his habit of executing what he calls “‘guerrillas’ in towns” sound routine.[7]  In one massacre alone, the Los Tangueros captured dozens of campesinos from a neighboring town.  Back at the ranch,  “they tortured them all night with crude instruments before shooting some and burying others alive.”[8] Los Tangueros along with other death squads dispersed throughout the country would evolve into the present 9,000-strong paramilitary force in Colombia, [9] now killing up to twenty civilians per day.[10]

During the early 1980s when Castaño’s father was captured by the FARC, rural Colombia was rife with small diverse paramilitary units working for the army and the landholding upper classes.[11]  Many of these groups were merely the enforcers and protectors of the local wealthy, while others worked protecting the  “new rich” of the cocaine trade from the “taxation” of the left-wing insurgencies.  Some of these groups bore the names of petty criminal gangs or the names of their leaders.  They liked to call themselves  “self-defense” or “auto defense” groups, but here we will use the term ‘paramilitaries” to avoid confusion.  In the 1980s, these paramilitary groups were disparate and not well trained, and sometimes got involved in turf battles between themselves.  If they were to take the offensive against the steady advances of the leftist guerrillas, the paramilitaries would need both political/military training and unification.  And while these paramilitaries essentially worked for the same counterinsurgent goals as those of US foreign policy, the US could not directly support them.  But another country could.

Exactly how Carlos Castaño got to Israel is still a mystery, as is precisely which entity trained him there. But whoever set it up, the Israeli course “562″ definitely had a strong effect on Castaño.  “Something clicked in me, and I began to behave differently[12]…My perception of this war changed radically after my trip to Israel,”[13] he said in his “as told to” Colombian run-away bestseller of interviews edited by Spanish journalist Mauricio Aranguren Molina.

Carlos Castaño was clearly a good and highly motivated student. Of his studies in Israel, which is the subject of chapter 6 of in his book, he reminisces:

“Unlike what one might think, we studied in the classroom more enthusiastically than in the military training.  The classes emphasized the regular and irregular ways in which the world operates… It was there that I rounded out my education… [The teachers] insisted on us carrying ourselves well, in both the way we dressed and in the way we spoke in public.  I also received a class on how to enter and register in a hotel and we analyzed how to behave around immigration police in airports.  We read in libraries and spent long sessions on both the self-esteem and the security that an individual should have.  This was an invaluable process which taught me to respect and have confidence in myself, to triumph during tough intimidating moments.”[14]

Most importantly for the eager student, he “received lectures on how the world arms business operates, and how to buy arms.”[15]

And of course, there was also a military component:

“I received instruction in urban strategies, how to protect oneself, how to kill someone, or what to do when someone is trying to kill you, depending on the situation.  We learned how to stop an armored car and use fragmentation grenades to break through and enter into a target.  We practiced with multiple grenade launchers, and learned how to make accurate shots with RPG-7s, or shoot a cannon shell through a window.”[16]

“We also took complementary courses on terrorism and counter terrorism, night vision equipment, and parachuting.  We also learned how to make homemade bombs.  In short, we learned what the Israelis know, but, in all sincerity, very little of all of this has been applied to the war in Colombia.  I got a very good basic education, and there I learned how to do the most important thing – I learned how to control fear…”[17]

Castaño also describes training that could not have taken place without the express permission of the highest authorities of the Israeli Defense Forces, such as when he performed “airborne maneuvers and [we] parachuted at night over islands of the Mediterranean. I had to carry weights as ballast to adjust my free-fall speed.” [18]

Not all was study for Castaño in Israel, and he used his free time to meet with Colombian soldiers undergoing regular military training there, in which the worst human rights violators in the western hemisphere  were being trained by the worst human rights violators in the Middle East.  But these were precisely the connections that would prove so useful in the future.

“In the Sinai desert, I also had the opportunity of meeting military men from our country, the men of the Colombia battalion.  I did not meet the battalion as a whole, but on my R & R days, we went to the same places, and I spent time in the company of sergeants and officers.” [19]

Castaño summarizes his epiphany in Israel: “Upon returning to Colombia, I had become another person… I learned an infinite amount of things in Israel and to that country I owe part of my essence, my human and military achievements, although I repeat, in Israel I didn’t only learn about things related to military training.  There I became convinced that it was possible to destroy the guerrillas in Colombia.  I started to understand how a people could defend itself against the whole world.  I understood how to bring into the “cause” a person who had something to lose in the war, with the aim of converting him into the enemy of my enemies.”[20]

By 1985, shortly after Castaño returned to Colombia, some of the paramilitary groups that were springing up had become completely dependant on the monies from drug trafficking.  Indeed, some paramilitary units had merely evolved as such from drug protection rackets.  In fairness it is true that some of the paramilitary groups were not related to illicit drug protection: some were formerly the guards of rich landowners, cattle ranchers and the like.  A secret 1989[21] Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence document [22] includes a section on the “Contamination of the Paramilitaries by Drug Trafficking,” even places a time and a place on this event, although there is other evidence (below) that this took place earlier.  “The economic crisis facing the paramilitary forces in 1985 was resolved by an alliance with drug trafficking… This alliance came about in mid-1985 when the Paramilitary intercepted a camper full of cocaine… After conversations with the drug traffickers through the initiative of HENRY PEREZ, the Paramilitary forces returned the camper and the drugs to their owners, receiving in exchange for it a four-door Toyota pickup…”[23] It should be noted that Henry Perez was part of the Caruso paramilitary gang, at the time also known as the Autodefensas del Magdalena Medio (Paramilitary Militia of Magdalena Medio)- as were the Castaños.  In fact, Castaño calls Henry Pérez one of the “fathers” of the paramilitaries, along with his brother Fidel, and the previously mentioned Bombona battalion Major Alejandro Álvarez Henao, who had introduced the brothers to their first death squad.[24]  From this point onwards, these paramilitaries expanded, protecting operations of the Medellín cartel and others, including that cartel’s competition in Cali.

The DEA was also watching: Its agents had noticed a paramilitary/drug trafficking connection at least as early as 1993: “Intelligence indicates that some of Colombia’s private paramilitary groups have been co-opted by cocaine trafficking organizations. Throughout the 1980s, the Autodefensas del Magdalena Medio (Self-Defense Militia of Magdalena Medio), one of the most important of these groups, had close ties with the Medellín Cartel’s organization.”[25]

A year later, in another report, the DEA looked at the relationship between the left-wing insurgencies and the drug trade, accurately stating: “Despite Colombian security forces’ frequently claim that FARC units are involved directly in drug trafficking operations, the independent involvement of insurgents in Colombia’s domestic drug production, transportation, and distribution is limited…No credible evidence indicates that the national leadership of either the FARC or the ELN has directed, as a matter of policy, that their respective organizations directly engage in independent drug production or distribution.  Furthermore, neither the FARC nor the ELN are known to have been involved in the transportation, distribution, or marketing of illicit drugs in the United States or Europe.”[26]  In other words, the left-wing insurgencies taxed the production of coca or its products’ transportation through insurgent-controlled areas, but were not involved in its processing to cocaine, shipping or marketing – as opposed to the paramilitaries who ran and still run processing factories and were and still are actively involved in shipping it out of the country.[27]

Paramilitary leaders also set up clandestine training schools in Colombia, or “schools for assassins” as they were called by the previously mentioned secret 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence report.[28] The first such school that was discovered was called “El Tecal,”[29] and it trained the first of the paramilitary forces, and as these extended themselves deeper into the countryside and received greater funding form the drug trade, they formed other schools in other areas.  For instance, “Cero Uno [Zero One] located at kilometer 9 of the Puerto Boyocá-Zambito road,” and “El Cincuenta”[30] [# 50] located on the road between Delirio and Arizá (Santander).”[31] There were also “satellite schools” with names reminiscent of bars such as “Galaxias.”[32] According to the DAS report, “Personnel graduated from these schools to incorporate into the ‘paramilitary-narcotrafficking’ structure with an aim to undertaking four specific jobs:
a. Protect the community and the properties of narcotrafickers from the guerrillas and rival groups.
b. Be responsible for the personal protection of the heads of the cartels and those of the paramilitary forces, functioning as bodyguards.
c: Produce cocaine in the laboratories of that organization…
d: Attack members of the Unión Patriótica[33] [legal political party affiliated with the FARC] and members of the government or political parties that opine against the drug trade.”[34]

To qualify as a candidate for training in these “schools for assassins” one had to be interviewed by narco Henry Perez and his cohorts, all friends of the Castaño brothers. Students were selected by “the express recommendation of a rancher, farmer or narcotraficker from the region.” with questions like “What is your ideology?  Are you capable of killing your father, mother or brother if it can be confirmed that they are guerrillas?” The candidates were told that the war may go on forever and that the only enemy was communism.  And “upon the evaluation and verification of all of the information supplied by the candidate, the candidate is given a medical exam and placed in a basic training course.  During the first stage of training, recruits are selected to work in the financial apparatus (drug production) or security (bodyguards, patrolmen).  The training course includes: a.) Camouflage techniques,  b.) Handling small arms and parading, c.) Explosives, d.) Personal defense, e.)  Identity preservation, f.) Body guarding, g.) Intelligence, h.) Counterintelligence, i.) Communications,  j.) First Aid.”[35]

But apparently this training by fellow Colombians was not enough, and in 1987 the Israelis were called in to help.  In the mainstream media the 16 Israeli and British trainers were presented as “mercenaries,” perhaps because of the bias of the Colombian DAS agents who wrote a report on them. These foreign military trainers were far too well connected to be ordinary “mercenaries”-they clearly acted with some government approval, most definitely that of Israel, and probably of some US entity also – as we shall see below. Castaño, who attended these courses, said that members of the Colombian Army had actually arranged the courses, which featured the training by a famous Israeli officer, Yair Klein.[36]

Again, it was Castaño ally Henry Perez who picked the candidates – along with drug kingpin Gonzalo Rodríguez Gacha.  According to his book, Carlos Castaño took part in the courses, and their organization occupied five[37] of the 50 scholarships.[38]

a.  A group of five Israelis taught the course called “PABLO EMILIO GUARIN VERA” in the “El Cincuenta” school of Puerto Boyocá.
b.  The instructors were in the area for a period of 45 days after having entered the country through Cartegena (Bolivar).  Initially, they stayed in the “El Rosario” residence of Puerto Boyocá and later in a rustic house on the Isla de la Fantasía (Fantasy Island)…[39]

There were also 30 scholarships awarded so that students could train further in Israel, just as Castaño had done: “According to what these instructors said, they were going to send the best 30 students for further schooling in a special course that would be taught in Israel.”[40] Thirty paramilitaries being sent to Israel would have clearly required the permission of the Israeli Defense Forces – the Israeli government.  It is hard to imagine anything else for a country continually at war.

And there was a Nicaraguan Contra connection: “TEDDY, the Israeli interpreter told our source that they should shorten and speed up the course because they had promised to train the Nicaraguan Contras in Honduras and Costa Rica.”[41] Anyone who thinks that these were simple “for hire” mercenaries would do well to analyze this quote.  At the time, only with express US government approval – particularly that of the State Department and CIA – could one get into the contra camps located in Honduras or Costa Rica, let alone a group of men bearing arms.   These Israelis were clearly trusted at the highest levels of both the Israeli and US governments.

During this time, and even up until the present, the Colombian state has not shown itself to be a monolith.  Even today, in spite of all of the US influence, one still finds government ministries that refuse to go along with the official line crafted by the US State Department and filtered through the presidency or some other ministry.[42]  This explains why part of the Colombian state -justice and police – were so clearly disturbed by the paramilitaries’ advances that in 1990 police units raided a Castaño property and exhumed 24 decomposed corpses, some showing signs of torture.[43]

And there were other troubles too: competition was growing between the Medellín and Cali drug cartels. According to a DEA Intelligence Report from 1993, “By 1990, for reasons that are still unclear, the Autodefensas del Magdalena Medio and the Medellín Cartel emerged as bitter foes.”[44] Former ally, Medellín cartel drug-kingpin Pablo Escobar was now being hunted by the Colombian state, aided by US intelligence agencies and the DEA.[45]  The Castaño brothers helped the Colombians and the U.S. in the hunt for Escobar, which resulted in Escobar’s death.  Carlos had lines of communication open to the actual police squad that killed Escobar, as he knew “the brother of the famous police colonel, Hugo Martínez Poveda, commander of the Search Team that killed Pablo Escobar” from time both of them had spent in Israel.[46]

After Escobar was out of the picture, the Castaño brothers consolidated and unified the paramilitaries under the name “Auto-Defensas Unidas de Colombia” (Unified Self-Defense Forces of Colombia), known by its Spanish acronym AUC:

“From these death squads grew the Peasant Paramilitary Force of Cordoba and Urabá (ACCU), the oldest and largest of the AUC’s confederation of privately funded armies across the country. This was a result of Carlos Castaño’s new leadership: He transformed a regional protection force into a national political movement..”[47]

The effect was dramatic.  The paramilitaries grew in size from a few thousand to nine thousand or more, and as Time magazine reported in 2000: “Fear of AUC vengeance is one reason at least 1 million peasants fled their homes during the past decade.”[48]  Like the Nicaraguan contras, the Salvadoran and Guatemalan death squads, the paramilitaries were known for using excessive violence to terrorize the population, and on at least one occasion paramilitary units used chainsaws to torture and kill their victims.[49]

But there were also losses for the paramilitaries. In 1994, Carlos’s elder brother Fidel or “Rambo” as he was known – then the paramilitaries’ leader – was – according to Carlos — killed in a chance combat with FARC guerrillas in northern Colombia.[50]  However there exists some doubt as to whether he is really dead.  The State Department apparently believes that he may still be alive and a recent article rumours him to be living in Israel.[51]   Whatever the truth may be, Carlos took over the top paramilitary position at that point, and the movement grew even more, even acquiring a rudimentary air force, something that CIA black propaganda was always trying to pin on the guerrillas,[52] so it could induce the mainstream press to argue for more military aid to bolster the Colombian government.

In reality, the insurgents didn’t have an air force, but the paramilitaries did and still do. By the late 1990′s, the paramilitaries had acquired several helicopters, along with maintenance mechanics and pilot training.[53]  Helicopters are extremely costly to purchase and maintain, but are very useful in this type of war, as Carlos was soon to find out.  According to his autobiography, his life was saved during the Christmas holidays of 1998 when a large FARC contingent attacked his base-camp in a surprise assault. It was the Israeli-trained pilot and[54] paramilitary commander Salvatore Mancuso[55] who rescued him in a paramilitary helicopter.[56]

Castaño has often met in secret with government officials, but by 2000 the meetings were being openly reported.  On November 6, 2000, he met with Colombia’s Interior Minister Humberto de la Calle of then-President Andrés Pastrana’s Government.  As a result of the meeting, Castaño released two of seven legislators that his paramilitaries were holding captive.[57]  Indeed, at the time of this writing, Castaño and Mancuso are in discussion with the new Colombian government.[58], [59]

As the movement expanded, continuing to absorb other paramilitary organizations, it needed arms, and probably had several sources for them, one of which came to light last May.  It should come as no surprise to the reader that the suppliers were Israelis. Israeli arms dealers have long had a presence in next-door Panama and especially in Guatemala (see side bar).  While some of the details of this particular deal have been contested and are still sketchy, one thing is clear: by a series of misrepresentations, GIRSA, an Israeli company associated with the IDF and based in Guatemala was able to buy 3,000 Kalashnikov assault rifles and 2.5 million rounds of ammunition that were then handed over to the paramilitaries in Colombia.[60]  This may remind us of what Carlos Castaño said about his course in Israel – when he received “lectures on how the world arms business operates, and how to buy arms,”[61] – probably complete with the connections to do so.

This arms deal featured tier upon tier of deniability and smokescreens.  Although Colombian police uncovered the deal, no one has been indicted over it.  The only players who appear to have known what was going on were the Israelis and the paramilitaries. The Nicaraguan police who sold the arms thought they were trading them for Israeli mini-Uzis and Jericho pistols.  The US State Department, which had recently placed the Colombian paramilitaries on its “terrorist” list claims though spokesperson Wes Carrington that the department was under the impression that the fully automatic assault rifles were going to collectors in the US![62]  Somehow that bait doesn’t go down easily.

The Uribe – Castaño Connection

Colombia’s President Álvaro Uribe Vélez, like Castaño, also lost his narcotrafficking father to the FARC, [63] but in the case of Uribe, the father died fighting on his ranch that was attacked by the insurgents.[64]  And there are other similarities, too: like Castaño, the Uribe family has had close ties to the cocaine trade, even renting out a helicopter to the business.[65]  In fact, Uribe’s father was once indicted for his role in the famous Tranquilandia cocaine-processing lab, after it was taken out by a combined DEA-Colombian police operation [66].  During the 1980′s (check dates) Uribe was head of Civil Aviation (Aerocivil) in Colombia and controlled all of the aviation licensing throughout the country at a time when small planes did most of the drugrunning.[67]  When Uribe was governor of Antioquía department in the mid-1990s, he helped set up a paramilitary force called Convivir,[68] in which paramilitary boss Salvatore Mancuso is rumored to have served.[69]
Legitimizing the paramilitaries

During the last Colombian presidential elections, a “cleansed” Uribe was voted into power supported by the US State Department.  Many of the plans for his government are based upon a US-generated Rand Corporation study.  A major part of both the Rand study and Uribe’s plan involve the creation of a large civil defense/government informer force that will be beholden to the Colombian state.  The Rand report, like all things Plan Colombia, was first written in the United States.  It bases a new Colombian Civil Defense counterinsurgency structure on the Peruvian “Ronda” system — which acted under Army supervision and was greatly responsible for reducing the size of the Shining Path guerrillas as well as committing a multitude of human rights abuses. Apparently, Uribe’s idea is that Castaño’s paramilitaries first have a ceasefire against the army – which is in itself a falsity since the AUC always worked alongside the army –  then the paramilitaries would become legal entities of the Colombian state under a different name.  Thus Castaño’s paramilitaries will become legitimized and continue the counterinsurgent war with the direct assistance of the United States, their bloody hands washed in State Department PR.

At that point, Israel will no longer be needed in Colombia.  And indeed, it would prefer to be forgotten, as there is no doubt that it shares some blame for the many years of ongoing bloodbath in Colombia, which kills as many as 20 people a day[70] – some 70% or more of which is attributed to the paramilitaries, totaling tens of thousands over the last decade.[71] Most of those murdered are killed for merely being suspected of sympathies to the insurgency, not for being actual combatants. Unfortunately, we can expect the training of Phalange-like paramilitary groups to continue throughout the world, as the Israeli state gleefully continues to undertake operations that are deemed too distasteful for its US counterparts.


——————————————————————————–

ENDNOTES

[1] Mi Confesión:  Carlos Castaño Revela sus Secretos, as told to Mauricio Aranguren Molina, Editorial La Oveja Negra Ltda, Bogotá Colombia. First edition, December 2001.   Also available on the AUC website:
http://colombia-libre.org/colombialibre/miconfesion.htm
[2] Mauricio Aranguren (ibid) page 107
[3] Dead Man’s Bluff, Stephen Dudley, The Washington Post, Sunday, November 24, 2002
[4] Mauricio Aranguren, page 88
[5] Colombia’s Other Army: Growing Paramilitary Force Wields Power With Brutality, Scott Wilson, Washington Post, March 12, 2001
[6] Dead Man’s Bluff, Stephen Dudley, The Washington Post, Sunday, November 24, 2002
[7] Mauricio Aranguren, page 107
[8] Dead Man’s Bluff, Stephen Dudley, The Washington Post, Sunday, November 24, 2002
[9] Colombia’s Growing Paramilitary Force, Jeremy McDermott, BBC News January 7, 2002
[10] Personal communication, Charlie Roberts, Colombia Human Rights Commission, 11/02/02
[11]  The present period is similar to another period in recent Colombian history called “La Violencia”, or one could simply view it a continuation of that period.  “La Violencia” is the name given for the 1945-1965 period of violence between the “Liberals” and “Conservatives” that started shortly after the assassination of Liberal leader Jorge Elecier Gaitan (see Paul Wolf’s excellent websitehttp://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/gaitan/gaitan.htm <http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/gaitan/gaitan.htm>  ).  During that conflict, the more progressive Liberals formed guerrilla bands, and the Conservatives, backed by the State, the Church, and to some degree the United States, fought these insurgents with both a regular army and the police, which, at that time, essentially acted as death squads, often massacring entire communities.  La Violencia was ended through negotiations in 1965, although its root causes were left unsolved, which is why the conflict persists today.
[12] Mauricio Aranguren, page 109
[13] Mauricio Aranguren, page 107
[14] Mauricio Aranguren, page 109
[15] Mauricio Aranguren, page 109
[16] Mauricio Aranguren, page 109
[17] Mauricio Aranguren, page 109
[18] Mauricio Aranguren, page 110
[19] Mauricio Aranguren, page 110
[20] Mauricio Aranguren, page 111
[21] All paramilitary groups in Colombia were made illegal in 1989.
[22] Untitled 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence “Secret” document
[23] Untitled 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence “Secret” document, pages 11 and 12
[24] Mauricio Aranguren, page 87
[25] DEA Intelligence Report 1993, obtained through the Freedom of information Act.  DEA Request Number 01-12152-F
[26] Insurgent Involvement in the Colombian Drug Trade: Drug Intelligence report, DEA Intelligence Division, June 1994, obtained through the Freedom of information Act.  DEA Request Number 01-1257-F
[27] There are some, yet unproven indications of greater insurgent involvement in the trade since the time of that report.
[28] Untitled 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence “Secret” document
[29] Untitled 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence “Secret” document, page 9
[30] “La 50″ according to Castaño, Mauricio Aranguren, page 99
[31] Untitled 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence “Secret” document, page 12
[32] Untitled 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence “Secret” document, page 13
[33] It should be noted that the paramilitaries were extremely successful in assassinating civilian members of the legal Unión Patriotica political party (UP).  And indeed, this bears great similarity to the present Israeli government practice of selective assassination as a political toll.  In the case of the UP, it was the only political party on this hemisphere that has actually been decimated – about 90% of its leadership was exterminated by the paramilitaries and sometimes directly by the Colombian army.
[34] Untitled 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence “Secret” document, page 13
[35] Untitled 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence “Secret” document, pages 14-17
[36] Mauricio Aranguren, page 99
[37] Mauricio Aranguren, page 99
[38] Untitled 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence “Secret” document, page 20
[39] Untitled 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence “Secret” document, page 19
[40] Untitled 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence “Secret” document, page 19
[41] Untitled 1989 Colombian Police (DAS) Intelligence “Secret” document, pages 20-21
[42] See, for instance, the Colombian Ministry of Environment or the Human Rights Ombudsman’s Office positions relating to the aerial fumigation issue.  These ministries have continually and very publicly argued with the presidency, the army and the police, among others (http://usfumigation.org <http://usfumigation.org/>  ).
[43] King of the Jungle, Tim McGirk, Time magazine, November 19, 2000
[44] DEA Intelligence Report 1993, obtained through the Freedom of information Act.  DEA Request Number 01-12152-F
[45] Killing Pablo: The Life and Death of Pablo Escobar, Mark Bowden, Philadelphia Inquirer, November 2001  Website (free version):http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/special_packages/killing_pablo/
[46] Mauricio Aranguren, page 110
[47] Colombia’s Other Army: Growing Paramilitary Force Wields Power With Brutality, Scott Wilson, Washington Post.  March 12, 2001
[48] King of the Jungle, Tim McGirk, Time magazine, Nov 19, 2000
[49] Inter-American Court on Human Rights, Organization of American States: “303. The paramilitary groups in Colombia have employed horrifying techniques of torture, including the use of chainsaws and other techniques to dismember their victims. For example, on February 21, 1996, in the community of Las Cañas, in the municipality of Turbo, Department of Antioquia, members of the ACCU paramilitary group tortured and then killed Edilma Ocampo and her daughter Stella Gil. The paramilitaries, some of whom wore hoods, arrived at the home of the victims at 10:30 a.m. Stella’s three children were present at the time. The paramilitary members tied the hands of the victims and told them that they would receive a special treatment, since they were guerrillas. The two women were taken out of the house approximately 100 meters and were beaten and decapitated in front of the three children. The victimizers then opened the stomachs of the victims, from the waist to the neck. They then placed Stella’s dead body on top of Edilma’s body and threatened the other residents of the community to leave the area or suffer the consequences. These actions obviously constitute acts of physical torture against those who are killed as well as psychological torture against those who are forced to witness these events and who are threatened with similar consequences.”http://www.cidh.oas.org/countryrep/Colom99en/chapter.4f.htm
[50] Mauricio Aranguren, page 21
[51] Dead Man’s Bluff, Stephen Dudley, The Washington Post, Sunday, November 24, 2002
[52] Sharon Stevenson, personal communication, March, 2000
[53] Mauricio Aranguren, foto pages
[54] La Conexión Mancuso-Marulanda, Cromos No. 4358, August 13, 2001
http://www.cromos.com/4358/actualidad4-1.htm
[55]  Mancuso is Sicilian-born, holding dual Italian/Colombian citizenship.  La Conexión Mancuso-Marulanda, Cromos No. 4358, August 13, 2001http://www.cromos.com/4358/actualidad4-1.htm
[56] Mauricio Aranguren, page 243
[57] Castaño meets Interior Minister, International Risk Circular, protection Concepts Corporation, November 7, 2000
http://www.psinternational.ca/sampleirc.doc
[58] Negociación secreta Revista SEMANA, Bogotá – 25 de Nov-1 de Dic, 2002
[59] Colombia’s Paramilitaries Agree to Cease – Fire REUTERS Nov 24, 2002
[60] Nicaraguan Official Told U.S. Diplomat of Arms Deal That Later Went Bad, Filadelfo Alemán, AP, Monday, May 6, 2002
[61] Mauricio Aranguren, page 109
[62] Israeli Arms Dealers Differ Over Responsibility for Shipment to Colombian Paramilitaries, Juan Zamorano, AP, May 7, 2002.
[63] ¿Quién es Álvaro Uribe Vélez? Rebelión website, April 10, 2002 http://www.rebelion.org/plancolombia/uribe100402.htm
[64] http://www.geocities.com/manesvil/uribe.htm
[65] Biografía no autorizada de Älvaro Uribe Vélez (El Señor de las Sombras), Joseph Contreras & Fernando Garavito, Editorial Oveja Negra, Bogotá, Colombia, 2002
[66] Ignacio Gomez, upon receiving Investigative Journalism Award 2002 from the Committee to protect Journalists.  © 2000-2002. International Center for Journalists. <http://www.libertad-prensa.org/copyright.html>  http://www.libertad-prensa.org/nacho.html Por el trabajo de los antecedentes que relacionan a Alvaro Uribe Vélez con el Cartel de Medellín. Es una investigación que se hizo en cinco partes. Una de ellas tenía que ver con la coincidencia cuando Pablo Escobar era miembro del Congreso y tenía muchísima actividad política o proselitista en los barrios pobres de Medellín, y por entonces Alvaro Uribe era el alcalde de Medellín y hacía programas muy paralelos a los de Pablo Escobar. Después Alvaro Uribe fue director de la Aeronáutica Civil. Antes de él, desde 1954 hasta 1981, el Estado había concedido 2.339 licencias, y durante los 18 meses que él ejerció, concedió 2.242 licencias, muy poco menos que en los 35 años anteriores, con el agravante que muchísimas de esas licencias, como 200, quedaron en manos del Cartel de Medellín. Y una de ellas, al menos una de ellas, quedó en manos de su papá, quien fue asesinado un tiempo después por las FARC. Cuando el helicóptero era objeto de la herencia, fue encontrado en un laboratorio famosísimo de Pablo Escobar llamado Tranquilandia. El helicóptero pertenecía a Uribe y su hermano. Además había una estrecha relación entre el papá de Uribe y el clan de los Ochoa, que era una familia muy importante en el Cartel de Medellín. Y la último fue cuando Pablo Escobar escapó de la cárcel y trató de hacer un nuevo acuerdo con el gobierno, y el encargado de llegar a ese acuerdo fue Alvaro Uribe Vélez. De todo esto nosotros teníamos cinco historias. Nosotros sólo alcanzamos publicar una, que es la relacionada con el helicóptero. Y el día que la publicamos el presidente se puso demasiado bravo, me insultó a mi por la radio, y comenzaron a presentarse llamadas misteriosas amenazando de muerte a la hija de dos años de Daniel Coronell, director de Noticias Uno, el programa donde trabajo yo ahora. Y se presentaron diversas presiones dentro de los otros socios del canal para que yo fuera expulsado. Entonces la serie se suspendió, no se emitió.
[67] Biografía no autorizada de Älvaro Uribe Vélez (El Señor de las Sombras), Joseph Contreras & Fernando Garavito, Editorial Oveja Negra, Bogotá, Colombia, 2002
[68] Colombian Labyrinth: The Synergy of Drugs and Insurgency and Its Implications for Regional Stability
Angel Rabasa, Peter Chalk RAND, 2001 http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1339/MR1339.ch5.pdf
[69] Colombia: Paramilitares legalizados,  Rebelión website, Sept 9, 2002 http://www.rebelion.org/plancolombia/sodepaz090902.htm
[70] Personal communication, Charlie Roberts, Colombia Human Rights Commission, 11/02/02
[71] Comisión Colombiana de Juristas as cited in Colombia Update Vol 13. No1 Colombia Human Rights Network, fall 2001.  According to the Comisión’s report on 1997, 67% of assassinations were attributed to the paramilitaries; 20% to the guerrillas; and 3% to state agents – for the cases where the perpetrators were known.  According to their March 2001 Report,  “87.21 entail state responsibility”.  It should be noted that the Comisión considers the paramilitaries to be under the “state responsibility” rubric because of their thinly-disguised ties to the Colombian Army.




Secrets of the CIA

23 11 2010

Secrets of the CIA, posted with vodpod





In Search of the American Drug Lords

23 11 2010





Connections between “Freeway Ricky Ross” and Contra Cocaine Pipeline

23 11 2010

 





USDA: No strategic grain reserves…they sold them!

23 11 2010

Marti Oakley (c)copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved

A note to readers:  Just today, friends in Newnan Georgia reported that as they did their monthly buying of food, a routine they have had for more than twenty years, they were stopped at the check out and told that they had exceeded the allowed amount of various food staples.  They were not allowed to purchase more than a few weeks worth of supplies.

It has begun.   Marti

_________________________________________________________

As recently as 2008, the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), a wholly owned subsidiary of the USDA, reported that there was virtually no grain stores left in the US.  Of the 24.1 million bushels in reserve, only 2.7 million bushels remained after the bulk of the grain stores were given for humanitarian relief. While some of the grain may have been used for humanitarian purposes, there is no evidence to support this contention. Furthermore, the use of the term humanitarian does not necessarily mean that the grain wasn’t sold, its just meant to condition public thinking into believing the grain was given away to hungry people.  I would bet that wasn’t the case at all.

There has been no effort by USDA or CCC to re-establish our strategic grain reserves.  The purpose of the CCC is to maintain a balanced supply of food commodities as a strategic backup in case of emergency and is charged with distributing those back up supplies to the population should they be needed. The strategic reserves which had been established as a result of the Great Depression were depleted in the 1980’s and USDA at that time announced it would not re-establish this back up and of course our current bio-tech pandering Ag secretary isn’t about to re-establish them either.

S.510 would insure the capture of the markets for corporations whose only interest is exporting whatever our land can produce to other nations, for commodities profit.  Nothing will be held back for the US as “free trade” and export will be first and foremost. Instead of focusing on securing a back up supply for the US, the USDA continues to push for ever more exportation of our food supply.  Now why would USDA and congress be promoting export over securing the food supply for the US?

This “free trade” thing is killing us economically. The cost of free trade needs to be measured not by whether or not a few selected individuals make a ton of money, but, by whether or not the economy is benefited by allowing it to continue.  Free trade has morphed into rape and pillage, leaving economic destruction in its wake and we are about to be left in the dirt and wondering where our next meal is coming from as multi-national corporations line up to seize control of the worlds food supplies.

Along with this loss of strategic grain reserves, there is no butter, cheese, dry milk or any other food commodity stockpiled for the American people in the event the predicted food crisis occurs.  Nearly one third of all corn crops are now diverted to ethanol production and are not grown for food; this while the coming food crisis begins.

It is our belief that this refusal by USDA and CCC to establish a food store for emergencies goes hand in hand with the intent of S.510, the fake food safety bill. This bill will effectively centralize food production not only geographically, but also in the marketplace by eliminating family and independent producers and centralizing food production in CAFO operations and other concentrated farming applications.

The Farmer Owned Reserve (FOR) is busy promoting the most sensible solution to decentralization of food stores, by advocating that grain be stored on farms; effectively establishing and protecting grain reserves as they would be dispersed all across the country as opposed to deposited in massive and easily targeted grain terminals.  Of course USDA and CCC have their ears plugged on this sensible solution as it limits their control and manipulation of markets and reduces the number and value of contracts they can issue for export; meaning the amount of money that would be generated by contracting with multi-national corporations against the people of the United States would be seriously impaired, reducing the profit margin for USDA on export contracts.

This was alluded to in the 2009 National Grain and Feed Association (NGFA) report on the wonderful deal grain producers would get if they didn’t store grain on site and instead stored in government owned and controlled facilities.  Far from being a logical and defensive strategy, the intent of NGFA (another USDA owned corporation)was summed up in its final statement on the advantages of government owned facilities:

  • It would better protect CCC’s financial interest, since the value of grain stored at commercial elevators generally is greater than on farm, and is a more “saleable” asset if marketing assistance loan grain is ever forfeited by the producer into CCC’s ownership.

This last statement was in fact the crux of the issue: “forever forfeited by the producer.” Its all about how to seize the supply and who will profit from its sale.  None of this plan for massive grain terminals is about anything other than selling off the crops our farmers produce to the highest bidders while leaving the US in the position of having no strategic stores of grains for emergencies. to get the full effect of the planning that went into the theft of our grain crops, you have to read the full document linked above.

Centralization, one of the key talking points when the USDA and FDA is promoting the overthrow of private domestic agriculture, is supposed to be avoided……there could be some mad man in a cave on the other side of the world just waiting for the chance to tip cows over in Iowa.  Then what?

These massive terminals that NGFA is promoting would centralize the grain reserves all across the country making them easy targets for terrorists; like the swat teams from USDA and FDA.  They don’t have to really worry about them showing up, these teams will be far too busy conducting police state raids on family and independent farms and ranches.

We do need to fear terrorists.  You will know them when you see them.  They will be dressed like star wars storm troopers and armed to the teeth with weapons the likes of which even James Bond couldn’t imagine.  They’ll also have the USDA and/or FDA logo on them just so you know who they are.

As for bio-terrorism……considering we have more than 700 bio-weapons labs cris-crossing the country, its pretty safe to say that should we have a bio weapon attack, it will probably originate from a city near you.





Thanks Mostaque

22 11 2010

[Mostaque, since your site offers no comments,  you should drop me a note.   peterchamberlin@naharnet.com  ]

The Pakistan military waging war against Pakistan.

Slow Ponderous Indians haven’t yet cottoned onto who actually runs Pakistan, its army/ISI which subsequently sometimes causes, especially in Kashmir, terrorism in India.


 





Would A Massive Run On the Banks Bring Down the House of Cards?

22 11 2010

Who, what, why: Would a mass cash withdrawal bring down the banks?

 Eric CantonaCantona wants a ‘real revolution’

Former footballer Eric Cantona has called on a new form of direct protest – a mass cash withdrawal – to bring down the banks. So what would happen if everyone tried to withdraw their savings?

From the footballer who once kung-fu kicked an abusive fan, a new form of direct action without any violence.

Take your money out of the banks and spark their collapse, says Eric Cantona, in advice to the students and public sector workers holding protests in France and the UK.

"We must go to the bank. In this case there would be a real revolution," says the French former Manchester United star in a newspaper interview that has been filmed and widely viewed on YouTube.

"It’s not complicated. Instead of going on the streets and driving kilometres by car you simply go to the bank in your country and withdraw your money, and if there are a lot of people withdrawing their money the system collapses. No weapons, no blood, or anything like that."

So how effective would this form of protest be?

In the very unlikely circumstance of everyone heeding Cantona’s call, there are obvious practical hurdles preventing that number of people getting to cashpoints or queueing up in branches to withdraw their savings.

But setting those aside, the banks would need to find more cash, because only about 5-10% of people’s savings are kept in banks’ tills. The rest is lent out or invested.

"Banks only keep a small fraction of their deposits as cash, so the cash machines would run out and cash in the branches would run out," says Richard Wellings, deputy editorial director of the Institute of Economic Affairs.

"They could go to the Bank of England [for some cash] or they could sell assets to release cash but they probably wouldn’t bother because it would just be a temporary blip."

Although some branches may have to close, it would be very different from a conventional run on a bank because depositors would know it was related to a protest and not an underlying problem with the bank, so confidence would not be hit in the same way, says Mr Wellings.

Furthermore, all deposits up to £50,000 are government-guaranteed, through the protection of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, so that would help strengthen confidence and prevent a panic.

A part of BBC News Magazine, Who, What, Why? aims to answer questions behind the headlines

All their digital transfers would carry on as normal, this would just affect the physical payments of cash. These could be rationed or temporarily halted.

"The only effect it would have is to inconvenience a lot of people when they go to the cash machine and try to withdraw their money but find there’s no cash there. But it would not cause the collapse of the banking system. Notwithstanding the big problems, I can’t see it having much of an effect in reality."

When there is a run on a bank for reasons of confidence, then the government can step in, as it did for Northern Rock in 2007.

But if there was ever a collective panic sparked by a mass withdrawal against all the banks, then the consequences are far more serious.

In 2001 during the Argentinian economic crisis, large numbers of people began taking their cash out of the banks, so all bank accounts were frozen for months.





Security Forces Detain Taliban suicide-bomber Facilitator in Kandahar

22 11 2010

Security forces degrade Taliban suicide-bomber network in Kandahar

ISAF Joint Command

KABUL, Afghanistan – Afghan and coalition forces detained a key Taliban suicide-bomber facilitator during an operation in the Spin Boldak District of Kandahar province yesterday.
The targeted individual is responsible for transporting suicide bombers and materials from Chaman, Pakistan, into Kandahar City with the intent to facilitate suicide attacks in the surrounding area.
Afghan forces used a loudspeaker to call all occupants to exit the buildings peacefully before conducting the search. The Afghan and coalition forces detained the individual based on positively identifying him during initial questioning at the scene.
The joint security team conducted the operation in the hours of darkness to minimize the risk to local citizens. No women or children were injured or detained during this operation.





Georgia Not to Sell Strategic Russia-Armenia Pipeline

22 11 2010

Georgia Not to Sell Strategic Russia-Armenia Pipeline

The Georgian government has said it does not plan to sell a strategic pipeline that brings Russian natural gas to Armenia through its territory, News.am reported November 17.
According to a Georgian government spokesman, Niko Mchedlishvili, many regional states have expressed interest in purchasing the pipeline. “However, it does not mean that pipeline will be sold,” she said.
According to News.am, the Chairman of Georgia’s Parliamentary Committee for Legal Affairs, Pavel Kublashvili, proposed a sale of the gas pipeline earlier this year.
The Georgian parliament opened up the possibility of selling its pipelines in June when it voted in the first reading to remove the so-called North-South pipeline from a list of strategic state facilities not subject to privatization.
Speaking in Parliament during the bill’s debate, Georgian Prime Minister Nikoloz Gilauri, spoke of the possibility of putting 10-15 percent of the gas main shares up for sale in the London Stock Exchange.
Earlier in August, Azeri news sources reported that Azerbaijan was allegedly considering offering Georgia $500 million for the key energy pipeline.
Meanwhile, the head of Azerbaijan’s state oil company (SOCAR), Rovnag Abdullaev, has made no effort to hide his government’s intentions to buy all the oil and gas pipelines running through Georgia or to purchase all shares of the pipeline if it’s put on the market.
In 2006 Russia’s main gas exporter Gazprom offered $250 million for the pipeline, though Georgia asked for $1 billion.

Copyright 2010, Asbarez. All rights reserved.





The Control Fraud Theory

22 11 2010

The Control Fraud Theory

Control fraud theory was developed in the savings and loan debacle. It explained that the person controlling the S&L (typically the CEO) posed a unique risk because he could use it as a weapon.

The theory synthesized criminology (Wheeler and Rothman 1982), economics (Akerlof 1970), accounting, law, finance, and political science. It explained how a CEO optimized “his” S&L as a weapon to loot creditors and shareholders. The weapon of choice was accounting fraud. The company is the perpetrator and a victim. Control frauds are optimal looters because the CEO has four unique advantages. He uses his ability to hire and fire to suborn internal and external controls and make them allies. Control frauds consistently get “clean” opinions for financial statements that show record profitability when the company is insolvent and unprofitable. CEOs choose top-tier auditors. Their reputation helps deceive creditors and shareholders.

Only the CEO can optimize the company for fraud. He has it invest in assets that have no clear market value. Professionals evaluate such assets-allowing the CEO to hire ones who will inflate values. Rapid growth (as in a Ponzi scheme) extends the fraud and increases the “take.” S&Ls optimized accounting fraud by loaning to uncreditworthy and criminal borrowers (who promised to pay the highest rates and fees because they did not intend to repay, but the promise sufficed for the auditors to permit booking the profits). The CEO extends the fraud through “sales” of the troubled assets to “straws” that transmute losses into profits. Accounting fraud produced guaranteed record profits-and losses.

CEOs have the unique ability to convert company assets into personal funds through normal corporate mechanisms. Accounting fraud causes stock prices to rise. The CEO sells shares and profits. The successful CEO receives raises, bonuses, perks, and options and gains in status and reputation. Audacious CEOs use political contributions to influence the external environment to aid fraud by fending off the regulators. Charitable contributions aid the firm’s legitimacy and the CEO’s status. S&L CEOs were able to loot the assets of large, rapidly growing organizations for many years. They used accounting fraud to mimic legitimate firms, and the markets did not spot the fraud. The steps that maximized their accounting profits maximized their losses, which dwarfed all other forms of property crimes combined.

While agreeing that the S&L served as both a “weapon” and a “shield,” control fraud theory cast doubt on those metaphors. Weapons and shields are visible; fraud is deceitful. The better metaphors would be camouflage, or a virus. Control fraud theorists rejected the economists’ metaphor, “gambling for resurrection” (honest but unlucky risk takers). Gambling cannotexplain why control fraud was invariably present at the typical large failure. There were over 1,000 felony convictions of senior S&L insiders. Accounting fraud made control fraud a sure thing-not a gamble. Control fraud theory predicts the pattern of record profits and catastrophic failure and the business pattern of deliberately making bad loans. Both patterns are inconsistent with honest gambling.

Control fraud theory was developed in the savings and loan debacle. It explained that the person controlling the S&L (typically the CEO) posed a unique risk because he could use it as a weapon.

The identification of the S&L “high fliers” as control frauds and understanding that they were Ponzi schemes relying on accounting fraud led to effective regulatory strategies against the wave of S&L frauds. The Federal Home Loan Bank Board reregulated the industry, curbing growth (a Ponzi scheme’s Achilles heel) while the control frauds were still reporting record profits and were praised by top economists.

The second use of control fraud theory was to analyze the structures that produced criminogenic environments that led to waves of control fraud. Deregulation and desupervision of the S&L industry, combined with the industry’s mass insolvency, optimized accounting fraud and made “systems capacity” limitations critical. The mass insolvency maximized “reactive” control fraud, and the deregulation, desupervision, and mass insolvency maximized entry into the industry by “opportunistic” control frauds.

Fraud waves can cause financial bubbles to hyperinflate (e.g., Texas real estate during the debacle) and cause regional or systemic injury (e.g., during Russia’s “shock therapy,” the failures of “the Washington consensus,” and the U.S. high-tech bubble). Control frauds cause indirect losses by corrupting politicians and professionals and betraying trust. When control fraud becomes endemic, it can lock nations in long-term poverty.

Control fraud theory poses a fundamental challenge to the core models of finance and economics. The efficient markets (and contracts) hypothesis requires that markets be able to identify and exclude control frauds, and the dominant law and economics model asserts that they do so effectively and quickly. This claim is largely premised on the view that no top-tier audit firm would give a clean opinion to a control fraud. Control frauds have consistently falsified this claim. Deposit insurance was not the key to S&L control fraud. Control frauds deceive “creditors at risk.” High reported profits allow them to grow rapidly by borrowing and issuing stock.

To date, most of the work in control fraud discusses looting by the CEO. However, it also exists in government when the head of state uses the government to defraud. It can be used to defraud customers (e.g., “lemons” scams, in which quality or quantity is misrepresented, or cartels) and the public (e.g., tax fraud or a toxic waste firm that gains a cost advantage by dumping in the stream). These forms of control fraud create real profits and, absent effective enforcement, create a dynamic that causes fraud to spread. Systems capacity problems can lead to endemic control fraud in an industry.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 43 other followers