What Passes For Journalism And Opinion In America

What Passes For Journalism And Opinion In America

By Stephen Lendman

9-11-11

On the 10th 9/11 anniversary, a September 9 Washington Post editorial highlights what readers hungry for news and information face. Titled, “Ten years after Sept. 11: The gains outweigh the mistakes,” it says:

“(C)onventional wisdom (suggests) “We will be hit again” to “Osama bin Laden won by provoking us into a decade of overreaction.”

Fact check

Bin Laden had nothing to do with a US state-sponsored attack. Criminal militarists, in fact, planned permanent war on humanity “overreaction.”

America “made big mistakes over the past decade…But the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon alerted Americans to genuine dangers that only a relative few had previously noticed.”

Fact check

Americans only are endangered by rogue government elements, not “crazed Arabs” wanting to harm them.

“The overreaction argument holds that al Qaeda goaded the nation to curtail civil liberties and construct a monstrous homeland security apparatus while bungling into adventures abroad that birthed new enemies….”

Fact check

Clinton’s 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act followed the 1995 false flag Oklahoma City bombing.

Air Force General Benton K Partin (a noted explosives and ordnance expert) revealed that high-grade military explosives, detonators, and proper internal placements heavily damaged the Murrah building and 300 others within a sixteen-block radius.

The 300 + page USA Patriot Act was written well in advance of 9/11 as were plans to establish a “monstrous homeland security apparatus” now in place.

Moreover, “adventures abroad” weren’t “bungl(ed) into.” They were planned months or years in advance, ready to be launched at a chosen moment.

“The United States went to war in Iraq on the basis of faulty intelligence.”

Fact check

US lies became pretexts for wars on Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and other nonbelligerent states. Lies launch all wars, not “faulty intelligence.”

With America at war, “(t)here’s a danger that the nation will, once again, withdraw too soon from the challenges. Al Qaeda (is) a well-organized, capable organization intent on causing America mortal harm.”

Fact check

America’s wars create problems. They never solve them.

In the 1980s, Al Qaeda was a US creation to fight Soviet forces in Afghanistan. Ronald Reagan called them “freedom fighters.” Today they’re “terrorists.”

“Confronted with those realities, (Bush and Obama) accepted the same strategic truths: the United States must protect itself at home as much as it sensibly can while taking the fight to its enemies overseas….”

Fact check

America’s had no enemies since Japan surrendered in August 1945, except manufactured ones to justify permanent wars, because the business of America is war.

“Given the scope of the challenge, the country should give itself some credit for what it has achieved.”

Fact check

America’s “achieve(ments)” can be simply explained. They’re lawless, preemptive, permanent imperial wars on humanity, causing millions of deaths and injuries, as well as vast destruction.

On this 9/11 day or any other, it’s hardly a legacy to exude pride. It’s far worse than shame. It monstrously describes the rotting stench of out-of-control imperialism, ravaging planet earth to achieve hegemony.

“There was in fact no large-scale assault on personal freedoms – no equivalent to the Supreme Court-sanctioned roundup of Japanese Americans, no repeat of the Red Scare infringements on freedom of speech and association.”

Fact check

A monstrous police state apparatus followed 9/11, including repressive legislation, presidential directives and executive orders, a total surveillance society, and virtual war on democratic freedoms.

Muslims and so-called undocumented immigrants (mainly Latinos) are today’s Japanese!

Latinos are persecuted, detained, then deported for needing work to support their families back home because NAFTA destroyed their livelihoods.

Muslims have been targeted, hunted down, rounded up, held in detention, kept in isolation, denied bail, restricted in their right to counsel, tried on secret evidence, and convicted on bogus charges.

Afterwards they’ve been incarcerated for extra harsh treatment as political prisoners in segregated Communication Management Units (CMUs), in violation of US Prison Bureau regulations and the Supreme Court’s February 2005 Johnson v. California decision.

That’s police state harshness, also unleashed ruthlessly against other designated domestic and foreign targets.

“The Patriot Act enabled a modest, mostly court-supervised expansion of law enforcement vigilance.”

Both Bush and Obama administrations insisted “that the US war (is) not against Islam.

And though it took too long, (political Washington) eventually made clear that torture is not acceptable.”

The editorial’s concluding comment praised those “who have fought and worked to keep the country safe.”

Fact check

The Patriot Act eroded four Bill of Rights Freedoms, including due process; free expression, association and assembly; legal representation; and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.

Moreover, state-sponsored Islamophobia rages, and torture is official US policy. It continues out of sight and mind in numerous prison hellholes, including in America.

That’s today’s state of the nation, but it didn’t happen by chance. It was well-planned long in advance and carefully implemented. As a result, in America’s post-911 world, no one anywhere is safe, including at home.

Fundamental international and constitutional laws are in tatters, replaced by out-of-control rampaging to advance America’s imperium.

As a result, the nation never has been less safe or free, and the worst is yet to come.

The Post editorial can be summarized in two words – disgraceful and scandalous.

But what else could be expected from a leading US broadsheet, infamous for publishing managed news, commentaries and opinions, especially about what’s most important.

A September 9 New York Times editorial matched the Post’s reinterpretation of hard truths neither paper will address. Headlined “A New Start for Libya,” it says:

It “would be unrealistic to expect a smooth transition in the early days of Libya’s post-Qaddafi era.” However, “(t)here are also signs of progress on military, diplomatic, economic and political fronts.”

Fact check

Dozens of previous articles explained reality on the ground in Libya, described as:

– a Nuremberg level crime;

– US/NATO state terror on a ferocious scale;
– NATO called a killing machine;

– initiated was months of planned bloodbath;

– the genocidal rape of Libya;

– NATO’s latest charnel house;

– besieging and terror bombing cities;

– carving up the Libya corpse for profit;

– Libya, Inc.: coming waste, fraud and other forms of plunder on a grand scale; and

– American and Western media cheerleading war and its fallout, inflicting daily crimes and atrocities on a massive still ongoing scale.

Libya pre-March 19 no longer exists. It’s been laid waste by US-led NATO terror bombing and paramilitary killers on the ground.

They were enlisted, armed, funded, and licensed to slaughter, maim, terrorize and loot. They’ve taken full advantage.

As a result, minimally over 100,000 Libyans were killed, multiples that number injured, and many more aggrieved family members affected.

Moreover, war keeps ravaging Libya, inflicting many more daily casualties.

With a population 50 times Libya’s, if America experienced a similar catastrophe, the toll would be five million dead, perhaps another 25 million injured, and multiple numbers of aggrieved family members.

It would be an unprecedented disaster.

Imagine if a foreign journalist or opinion writer called it “a new start.”

The Times said “there is reason to be encouraged,” despite migrant African workers being terrorized and slaughtered, while admitting “(m)uch hard work remains.”

Two late August Times op-eds were just as disgraceful. On August 29, Roger Cohen headlined, “Score One for Intervention.” He compared Libya’s “successful Western invention” with its 1990s Balkan wars and 1999 Serbia/Kosovo terror bombing.

From March 24 – June 10, NATO’s “success” included around 600 aircraft flying about 3,000 sorties. They dropped thousands of tons of ordnance plus hundreds of ground-launched cruise missiles. To that time, the attack’s ferocity was unprecedented, given the destructiveness of modern weapons and technology.

Nearly everything was struck, causing massive destruction and disruption. Included were known or suspected military sites and targets; power plants; factories; transportation; telecommunications facilities; roads, bridges, rail lines, and other infrastructure; fuel depots; schools; a TV station; China’s Belgrade Embassy; hospitals; government offices; churches; historical landmarks; and more in cities and villages throughout the country.

An estimated $100 billion in damage was inflicted. The humanitarian disaster was horrific. Environmental contamination was extensive. Large numbers were killed, injured or displaced. Two million people lost their livelihoods. Many their homes and communities, and for most their futures from what America planned and implemented jointly with NATO.

They replicated it in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.

“Score One for Intervention.”

For years, Cohen’s produced numerous pro-war trash pieces like other corporate media scoundrels, selling their souls for a buck.

On August 31, so did Nicholas Kristof in his op-ed titled, “Thank You, America!” claiming fake Tripoli celebrations portray Americans and NATO partners as “heros.”

He, in fact, was there and knows, but lied, calling it “a historic moment….a rare military intervention for humanitarian reasons….a model (for future) intervention(s).”

Ignoring reality on the ground, he claimed “no looting (and) little apparent retaliation,” despite Tripoli streets strewn with corpses and its residents cowering inside homes in fear.

Instead, he hailed “great progress in the last few days. Tripoli now feels reasonably safe….Pro-Americanism now is ubiquitous.”

His contempt for civil values and intellectual dishonesty didn’t even match the level of a B horror movie script.

A previous article said corporate media scoundrels like him prostitute themselves daily, making street whores, pimps, and dope peddlers look respectable by comparison.

They indeed reveal the shocking state of America’s journalism and opinion.

Another article imagined freedom from all managed news and commentaries. Avoid them and make it happen.

Final 9/11 Comments

On September 9, a washingtonblog.com posting headlined:

“High-Level Officials Eager to Spill the Beans About What REALLY Happened on 9/11….But No One in Washington or the Media Want to Hear”

“9/11 Commission Admits it Never Got the Facts….But No One Wants to Hear From the People Who Know What Happened”

9/11 Commission co-chairman Lee Hamilton said:

“I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right,” adding that the commission was set up to fail.

Commission member Bob Kerrey said:

“There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version,” adding commission members didn’t have access to important information.

Other commission members also expressed frustration because key facts were suppressed, misrepresented, and military officials lied.

Commission member Max Cleland resigned in disgust, calling the inquiry “a national scandal.”

Senior Commission counsel John Farmer said “At some level of the government, at some point in time….there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened,” adding:

“I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described.” A “culture of concealment” describes the spin that became the official story.

All Commission members and various other present and past government officials knew that 9/11 mythology substituted for full disclosure.

To this day, nothing changed as Americans commemorate what’s best described as “The Big Lie of Our Time.”

As a result, the price they keep paying is incalculable.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Turkey asks US to base Predator drone on Turkish soil

Report: Turkey asks US to base Predator drone on Turkish soil

11 September 2011, Sunday / TODAYSZAMAN.COM,
The United States is considering a request from Turkey to base a fleet of Predator drones on its soil for cross-border operations against the terrorist Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) targets in northern Iraq, a news report said on Sunday.
The Obama administration has not yet made a decision on the Turkish request, the report in Washington Post said.

The Predators have been flowing from Iraqi bases since 2007 and the US shares data from the planes’ surveillance with Turkey as part of the two NATO allies’ cooperation against the PKK. Now that the US forces are scheduled to withdraw from Iraq by end of the year, this cooperation may effectively come to an end unless new bases are found for the Predators.

Turkish officials were not immediately available to comment on the report.

The report came after Turkey announced that it suspended all military agreements with Israel due to Israeli refusal to apologize for killing eight Turks and a Turkish American on an aid ship trying to break the blockade of Gaza on May 31, 2010.

Turkey has been using Israeli-made Heron drones in its fight against the PKK. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan complained last week that Israel delays delivery of Herons sent to Israel for maintenance.

The Turkish military launched aerial strikes on PKK targets in northern Iraq in August, responding to a spike in PKK attacks since July which resulted in deaths of dozens of Turkish soldiers.

Israel Denies PKK Threat, Erdoğan Staying Away From Gaza

Davutoğlu to Lieberman: No one can blackmail Turkey

TODAYSZAMAN.COM
1
Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu (R) spoke at a press conference with his Brazilian counterpart, Antonio Patriota, in Ankara on Sept. 11, 2011. (Photo: AA)
Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu responded on Sunday to a reported threat from Israel that it might offer military support to the terrorist Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) to punish Turkey, saying no one can blackmail Turkey.
Israel’s Yedioth Ahranoth daily reported on Friday that Lieberman is considering cooperation with the PKK, which could involve military support for the terrorist group to retaliate against a set of sanctions Turkey has recently imposed on Israel due to its refusal to apologize for killing eight Turks and one Turkish-American on an aid ship trying to break the blockade of Gaza on May 31, 2010. Turkey expelled the Israeli ambassador and other senior diplomats and suspended military agreements in response to an Israeli refusal to offer an apology.

Turkey’s Anatolia news agency said Lieberman denied that there was any discussion at the Israeli Foreign Ministry regarding the measures that were mentioned in the Yedioth Ahranoth report. The report had said the measures had been put forth at a meeting at the Israeli Foreign Ministry on Thursday.

Davutoğlu, speaking at a joint news conference with his Brazilian counterpart, Antonio de Aguiar Patriota, in Ankara, said Lieberman’s reported threat of extending support to the PKK was noteworthy given that it came just ahead of the 10th anniversary of Sept. 11 attacks on the United States. He said one cannot distinguish between terrorist groups at a time when the world is commemorating the victims of a terrorist attack 10 years ago. “We hope that Israel will follow up this denial [of Yedioth Ahranoth report] with actions as well,” he also said.

Davutoğlu also said the PKK has become a tool for those who want to harm Turkey. “It is important that our Kurdish brothers especially see this. Every time someone wants to disturb Turkey, they try to use the PKK for this. We have the power to continue both an effective struggle against terrorism and maintain our efforts for democratization. No one can blackmail us,” said Davutoğlu.

Following the reported threat by Lieberman, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office released a statement on Friday, saying the government’s policy is and always was aimed at preventing deterioration in ties with Turkey. “The prime minister and the government have discussed what to do in the event of an escalation, however, a decision will be made only in the event that it is necessary,” the statement said.

“Israel acted and is acting responsibly and hopes that Turkey will do the same,” the statement continued. Israel’s opposition leader Tzipi Livni also reacted to the report, saying Prime Minister Netanyahu “must show responsibility and not allow the adding of fuel to the fire with Turkey.”

Gaza not on Erdoğan’s itinerary

Davutoğlu also signaled that Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan will not cross the border into the Gaza Strip during a visit to Egypt that begins on Monday. Responding to a question, Davutoğlu said Erdoğan will also travel to Tunisia and Libya, but will limit his itinerary to those destinations.

But the foreign minister said Israel, which keeps Gaza under a blockade, faces growing isolation in the region because “it does not understand the big transformation” that has been going on its region. “If you kill civilian people in high seas, it means you no longer show respect for law. Therefore, isolation is inevitable for Israel,” Davutoğlu said.

Ergenekon Theme: Criticism of Turkey’s Generals Encourages the PKK Terrorists

 ”Every statement from [PKK leader Abdullah] Öcalan and the Peace and Democracy Party [BDP] should be used to propagate the theme that ‘the generals’ arrests and the attacks against the military’s reputation encourage these [the PKK and the pro-Kurdish BDP].”

Prosecutors accuse web site of aiding Ergenekon

 
11 September 2011, Sunday / BÜŞRA ERDAL, İSTANBUL
An indictment accepted on Friday by the İstanbul 16th High Criminal Court on the alleged deeds of Odatv, not a television channel as the name suggests but a news website, claims that the site’s operators were aiding and abetting the terrorist Ergenekon organization, which is charged with plotting to overthrow the government, by acting as the media center of the organization.
The prosecution maintains that the owner of the website, Soner Yalçın, was helping coup plotters implement a plan called National Media 2010. Journalists Nedim Şener and Ahmet Şık — currently in jail as suspects in the case — helped Odatv’s cause, the indictment says.

According to the indictment, Şık’s unpublished book “The Imam’s Army,” draft copies of which were seized at Odatv offices during the investigation, and the book “Simons in The Golden Horn” by former police chief Hanefi Avcı, who is also a suspect in an investigation into an obscure left-wing group called Revolutionary Headquarters, were written to assist Ergenekon in reaching its ultimate goal of overthrowing the government.

Both books were written on orders from Ergenekon, the İstanbul Prosecutor’s Office claims.

As evidence to back its claims, the indictment includes wiretap records of conversations between Yalçın, the website’s owners, and journalist Şener, who had denied any familiarity with Yalçın in his initial interrogation. Transcripts of his conversations with the other suspects, as well as personal notes indicating that he was giving Şener and Şık orders and assignments to carry out are also included in the indictment.

One such document is a Word document found on Yalçın’s computer titled “Sabri Uzun.” Yalçın wrote in the document: “Sabri has reservations on the book issue. Let’s try to convince him. The book should come out before the elections. Have Nedim talk to Ahmet Şık about this. Be brave when you are working on the book, don’t hesitate to take things out or add more things. This book has to be more comprehensive than Simon [referring to Avcı's book]. Congratulate Nedim. Have him have Ahmet work. Hanefi will get out and join you guys. Try and keep the morale of Ahmet and Sabri high. Try to make sure that the book comes out in Sabri’s name. This should happen as quickly as possible. It has to come out before the elections.”

Investigators found that the document was last saved on Dec. 20, 1010 by “Soner,” according to the computer’s document history tracking information. The prosecutor claims the above is evidence that Yalçın had given Şık an assignment as part of organizational activities.

The prosecutor claims that Şık’s unpublished book “The Imam’s Army” was written for the sole purpose of influencing the judiciary and the judicial process in the Ergenekon trial. The prosecution says the book strictly adheres to principles laid out in National Media 2010 — a document that served as one of the key documents guiding the organization.

According to the indictment, the books were intended to create the impression that the Ergenekon trial, whose suspects include a large number of generals and military officers, is not a legal matter but a politically motivated case. The prosecution claims that Odatv strove to manipulate the public by creating the image that the Ergenekon trial is targeting constitutional institutions, primarily the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) and the country’s high judiciary. The prosecution accuses Odatv administrators and journalists of disseminating misleading information.

Odatv planned to publish the propaganda materials, including Şık’s unpublished book, before the June 12 elections to undermine the credibility of the Justice and Development Party (AK Party).

Both “Simons in the Golden Horn” and “The Imam’s Army” include criticism of the religious social movement led by Fethullah Gülen. Critics of the case have accused the government of ties with the Gülen movement, saying Şık and Şener’s arrests are attempts at silencing the opposition.

Collapse of the ‘Trojan Horse’

The prosecution claims that the National Media 2010 document found on Odatv owner Yalçın’s computer in a raid on its office during the investigation was one of the master documents of the Ergenekon organization. Yalçın’s lawyers claim that the document was sent to his e-mail by unknown individuals. Yalçın himself says he has fallen victim to a conspiracy against him. The lawyers base their counter claims on a technical investigation they had ordered. The indictment, however, includes another report prepared by experts from the engineering department of Boğaziçi University, which seems to refute these claims.

Additional court experts have studied the university report, the indictment says. Data retrieval software has shown that the document was created on Yalçın’s computer, according to the indictment. The prosecution also notes that the same document was found on the computers of more than one suspect.

Allegations against Avcı

“Simons in the Golden Horn,” by former police chief Hanefi Avcı, published last year, is also mentioned in the indictment, which asserts that Avcı’s book was also a propaganda document for the coup-plotting Ergenekon organization. The indictment argues that the content of the book fits items listed to be followed as guidelines under the “Strategy” heading of the National Media 2010 plan. A paragraph under this heading says, “Information, documents and technical support should be provided to individuals well-known and trusted by the public so that they will make statements or publish material indicating that Ergenekon and related trials are part of a big setup.”

The book was published as part of these attempts, the indictment claims. The prosecution also says, citing the notes from Yalçın’s computer, that the draft book written by Ahmet Şık would have come out with the name of Police Chief Sabri Uzun if it had been published. Similar claims have come up against Avcı’s book, with investigators saying they had reason to suspect that the former police chief — once a legendary law enforcement official whose courageous investigation of the 1996 Susurluk affair, which exposed links between  the state and the crime world, had gained great public appreciation — was not the original author of Simons.

However, the indictment of Odatv does not make that claim, although it contends that Avcı’s book was also written as part of Ergenekon’s purposes. The prosecutors say Avcı himself is not a member of the Ergenekon terrorist organization, at least not a part of its chain of command, but did contribute to its targets by preparing documents that would help their cause.

A strategy of chaos: exploiting soldiers’ funerals

The indictment claims that the Odatv news site was the Internet publishing organ of Ergenekon. It includes evidence suggesting that Ergenekon members consciously planned to exploit nationalist sentiments arising during the funerals of Turkish soldiers killed in attacks by the terrorist Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).

The members of the group were to make statements stressing emphatically that “all the generals have been arrested [in the Ergenekon trial], and the terrorist group [PKK] has increased its attacks.” According to the prosecutors, Yalçın Küçük, an academic who is currently jailed on charges of being the “strategy designer” of Ergenekon, gave directions to Ergenekon members to keep alive the idea that the military is a sine qua non for the country’s livelihood. Küçük wrote in a note: “Martyr [soldier] funerals in particular are an important opportunity. Every statement from [PKK leader Abdullah] Öcalan and the Peace and Democracy Party [BDP] should be used to propagate the theme that ‘the generals’ arrests and the attacks against the military’s reputation encourage these [the PKK and the pro-Kurdish BDP].”

The indictment claims that Odatv owner Yalçın frequently met with Küçük, the Ergenekon suspect, and other alleged members of the organization to devise strategies to foment chaos and manipulate public opinion. The organization’s members sought to create the impression that Turkey is experiencing a civil war. The prosecution claims that in addition to Odatv being Ergenekon’s Internet media tool, Yalçın used journalists in other press organs to publish stories in that regard. The prosecutors also claim that stories published by the journalists who allegedly took orders from Yalçın followed his directives as they were given.

Are Quetta Bombings A Reaction to Younis Al Mauritani’s Arrest?

The Pakistani militaryconfirmed that a top Al-Qaeda leader, Younis Al Mauritani, who had specially been designated by the terrorist organization’s slain founder Osama bin Laden to target economic interests in the United States, Australia and Europe, had been detained from Quetta.

Al Mauritani was detained with Abdul Ghaffar Al Shami (Bachar Chama) and Messara Al Shami (Mujahid Amino), two other important operatives of the global Jihadist network. The significant arrests were made in a joint operation by the Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI) and the Frontier Corps (FC) Balochistan on “technical support” provided by the US intelligence services.

A press release issued by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), the media wing of the Pakistan army, said Al Mauritani was planning to target United States economic interests including gas/oil pipelines, power generating dams, and strike ships/oil tankers through explosive laden speed boats in International waters.

Al Mauritani’s actual position in Al-Qaeda is still murky. According to Long War Journal al Mauritani rose to popularity last year “after he was identified as directing a plot by al Qaeda to attack multiple targets in Europe in a Mumbai-like terror assault.”

The number 3 designation is often assigned by Western officials and media to al Qaeda’s suspected operations chief… al Mauritani is a senior member of al Qaeda’s external operations council, the division that is tasked with hitting the US, Europe, and allied nations. Al Mauritani, Adnan el Shukrijuma, and Ilyas Kashmiri are believed to be the senior-most members of the external operations council,”reported the Journal. 

The arrests have deepened Al-Qaeda’s crisis which began with the dramatic killing of its chief Osama bin-Laden. This significant development occurred a week ahead of the ten year anniversary of the attacks on the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon. This indicates that the battle against Al-Qaeda and its like-minded global terrorist outfits is not over even after a tumultuous decade.

The US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has welcomed the capture of Al-Qaeda top leader.  A Reuters report indicates that the Americans will most likely seek access to the detained Al-Qaeda leader for further investigations.

Some overexcited observers are viewing this as a major development to improve strained relations between Islamabad and Washington which have been deteriorating since the beginning of this year. Multiple factors, such as theRaymond Davis case, killing of Osama bin Laden and Pakistan’s refusal to grant visa to American military trainers, on the one hand and American decision to withhold $800 million  dollar to the Pakistani army, on the other hand, contributed to the worsening diplomatic and strategic relations.

In an analysis brief Jayshree Bajoria of the Council for Foreign Relations (CFR)wondered if this arrest was “a new chapter for U. S. Pakistan relations”. The brutally honest answer is, no.

Pakistan’s commitment in fighting Islamic terrorist groups will remain questionable until it voluntarily carries out operations against Taliban and Al-Qaeda leaders. As long as only the US and NATO orders compel Islamabad to move against terrorists, it should be assumed that Islamabad is only pretending as a partner in the war against terror.

Since 2001 when the Taliban regime was ousted from Afghanistan, we have beenexpressing our concerns over the safe heavens the Pakistani secrete services were providing to Islamic militant groups in the provincial capital, Quetta. The fundamentalists brought with them the culture of suicide bombings in Quetta and intimidated the government  functionaries to such an extent that they did not ever take action against the foreign nationals linked to Al-Qaeda and hiding in Balochistan. There was a time when the US and Afghan governments insisted that Mullah Omar, the spiritual leader of the Taliban, was hiding with the powerful Quetta-Shura. The Americans were so incensed with these reports that on at least three occasions they decided to carry out drone strikes on Quetta.

Almost all of the times, top Pakistani civil and military officers had denied the presence of the Quetta Shura or any other militant inside Balochistan. So had they been lying with the people and the media for so long until the Americans tracked the key Al-Qaeda leader? Probably, yes.

Younis Al Mauritani’s arrest does not suggest any policy or attitude change on Pakistan’s part. It simply appears to be a compulsion for the Pakistani authorities as they rightly believe that they’ve faced more humiliation in the past few months than their due share. They are caught up in a situation where the military’s collusion with the Islamists is repeatedly exposed in public and military assistance from Washington is permanently prone to suspension.

Wednesday’s twin suicide bombings in Quetta city on the Frontier Corps (FC), which killed at least twenty-two people including a top colonel of the federal paramilitary force and the wife of the Deputy Inspector General (DIG), appear to be a reaction to the recent arrest.  The military has to learn lessons that until it totally unplugs all forms of support to either for good or bad Taliban, it will continue to face more humiliation before the peace-loving international community and violence from terrorist Islamic groups.

Welcome to Zombieland

Welcome to Zombieland

Pakistan has paid for its mistakes in blood. But has it learnt anything?

By Mehreen Zahra-Malik

Aamir Qureshi / AFP

Every month is crueler than the last in Pakistan. We have come to accept this as the new normal, in order to simply truck along, spectators helplessly watching our own undoing.

Battered by U.S. allegations of duplicity, collusion with Osama bin Laden, mounting criticism at home over failing to intercept an attack on a major naval base and the murder of an investigative journalist in which fingers were directed at Inter-Services Intelligence, the Pakistan Army convened the 139th Corp Commanders conference on June 9. In an unusually detailed statement, the brass hit back at critics: “Some quarters, because of their perceptual biases, were trying to deliberately run down the Armed Forces, and the Army in particular. This is an effort to drive a wedge between the Army, different organs of the state, and more seriously, the people of Pakistan.”
Ten years after worlds collided on Sept. 11, 2001, it was clearer than ever before: the Pakistan Army just didn’t get 9/11.
As September 11 became the prism through which all history would subsequently be refracted, the Pakistan Army sought sanctuary in woe-is-us conspiracies, refusing to realize that the protégés it had fattened up for decades had turned rogue. Despite attack after audacious attack on Pakistan and the military itself, with at least 3,000 soldiers and over 30,000 civilians killed by terrorists, the generals still don’t know introspection.
September 11 should have marked a turning point not only in Pakistan’s relations with other countries (not least India, Afghanistan and the U.S.),it should have also profoundly impacted power relations within Pakistan itself. But the generals failed to understand that they continued to opt for business as usual at our collective peril. What was worse: while the Army failed, the political establishment never even tried.
Rethinking relations with India; embarking on economic reforms; giving up nonstate actors as a policy instrument; acknowledging the existence of the Quetta Shura; dismantling the old ways of exerting influence in Afghanistan—much needed to be and could have been done post-9/11. But Pakistan chose a transactional path best exemplified by what President Musharraf explained were his reasons for signing up for America’s war on terror: because he had been threatened into acquiescence by the Bush administration; and because he wanted to be able to further Pakistan’s interests, including by grabbing the carrots the U.S. was dangling. Musharraf believed what he said. Here and abroad, he was seen as America’s man. And he survived two publicly known assassination attempts.
Ironically, the Americans have kept paying us for our Janus-faced help. Even as we opened supply routes for the U.S. war machine in Afghanistan and went after Al Qaeda, we turned a blind eye to the Afghan Taliban, the Haqqani network and other elements that overtly challenge U.S. and, very often, Pakistani interests. If anything, we’ve learnt that we can get away with almost anything. We know full well that in worrying the world, we interest it. And if only for that reason, the world will always give us another chance.
One can’t see how the Army chief, Gen. Ashfaq Kayani, will make the right choices now, when he and his predecessors have declined to do so in the past. If this expectation is true, U.S.-Pakistan relations in particular, and Pakistan’s internal equation in general, will remain mired in a low-level equilibrium trap at best. At both levels—setting our own house in order and getting on the right side of history—the generals have adopted an unfortunate pragmatism aimed at protecting the lowest common denominator of achievement.
Ten years on, we measure our successes and sacrifice in terms of having retaken control of Swat, counting dead militants and civilians, denying complicity with drone attacks, matching India’s military buildup. We have witnessed attacks on GHQ, PNS Mehran, in bazaars and ballrooms. We have buried Pakistan’s bravest woman, minorities and their leaders, a courageous and charismatic governor. Where is the success in having to relive 9/11 almost every day? How do you measure success when everyone is part of the debris?
Decades of quick fixes and dirty deeds have brought us to this sorry pass. We’ve been staring at the fork in the road for the last 10 years. We know the path we must take, but we won’t go there. We prefer to watch. In so doing, we’ve forfeited the right to even mourn our tragedies.
Zahra-Malik is assistant editor at The News. The views expressed here are her own.
To comment on this article, email letters@newsweek.pk

Our only hope now is Divine Intervention

Our only hope now is Divine Intervention

By Loucas Charalambous

THE CHRISTOFIAS presidency has been extremely problematic for a long time now. Any doubts about this were shattered by the Mari blast which simply underlined its inadequacy.

Yet his appearance before the investigative committee on Monday proved that the problem is much bigger and much more serious than many had believed until now. The situation is desperate. And we should all be ashamed that we have reached the point of having as our president a man who is probably the most unsuitable Cypriot of all for the post.

Surely the best solution for the country would have been for him to step down voluntarily. However, he does not want to, or cannot, recognise this need which, ultimately, would be to his benefit.

The problem is that, as a country, we are currently faced with two very big issues, the handling of which requires excellent political judgement and abilities. Unfortunately, this president has neither judgement nor great abilities. The economy is heading for bankruptcy thanks exclusively to him.

And as if economic collapse were not bad enough, we now also have to contend with the very dangerous situation caused by Turkey’s threats of military action in the event that we embark on drilling for hydrocarbons.

These issues require prudent and skilful handling which only a person with proven political capabilities could deal with. But we have a clueless, incompetent, clumsy and dangerous – as he has emphatically proved – man in charge of the country. This is why we should be extremely worried.

Is it possible to expect this president, who has made a mess of everything, to handle such serious issues? Is it possible for a president who has even lost the most basic thing – his trustworthiness – to secure the alliances and assistance we need at this time?

I remind readers that, for close to two months, he and his spokesmen, had been taking us for a ride, maintaining that the president knew nothing about dangers posed by the munitions containers. This myth collapsed last weekend with the publication of a memo given to him, a year ago, by the head of his diplomatic office, who informed him that two National Guard officers had proposed to the defence minister the destruction of the munitions containers, because of the risks posed by the exposure to high temperatures.

This was preceded by former foreign minister Marcos Kyprianou’s revelation that at a Council of Ministers’ meeting in 2009, Christofias had said that the military informed him two of the containers were ‘a little dangerous’. His reaction, in both cases, was to do absolutely nothing, after he had taken the decision to keep the containers in Cyprus. In the end he lied to us as well.

Under the circumstances, who can trust this president who was not in a position to comprehend the serious dangers, not to mention his low regard for our intelligence? And whose trust would he be able to win, after he had tried to take everyone – the UN, the US, the EU, Syria and Iran – for a ride with his pitiful ‘political manoeuvres’?

Alarm is more than justified in this instance. The destruction wreaked by Christofias so far, might pale into insignificance compared to what lays ahead. Our only hope now is Divine Intervention. Perhaps the Almighty, now that the president has started going to Church services and shedding tears in order to win the sympathy of elderly churchgoers, would somehow make him realise that it is in his interest (not to mention the country’s) to step down immediately.

Suspicions grow about Afghan support for TTP

Border incursions: Suspicions grow about Afghan support for TTP

Analysts say some Afghan Taliban may be aiding their Pakistani namesakes. PHOTO: AFP/FILE

ISLAMABAD/KARACHI: Pakistan’s military believes the fugitive leaders of the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) are receiving outright support from militants as well as officials in Afghanistan, where they have found a safe haven.

The suspicion comes in the wake of an upsurge in cross-border incursions in Pakistan’s border regions led mainly by TTP militants and backed by their Afghan collaborators.

“The TTP senior cadres Maulana Fazlullah, Maulvi Faqir Muhammad and Abdul Wali, aka Omar Khalid, have been receiving support from local Afghan authorities and miscreants,” the military’s chief spokesperson Major-General Athar Abbas told The Express Tribune.

Maulana Fazlullah, also known as Mullah Radio, was the chief of TTP in Swat, while Maulvi Faqir and Omar Khalid headed the group in Bajaur and Mohmand, respectively.

Military officials have gone so far to accuse the authorities in northeastern Afghanistan of being complacent in these raids – a claim vehemently denied by Afghan officials.

The military itself does not directly blame them, but analysts believe some Afghan Taliban may be aiding their Pakistani namesakes, with or without approval from the group’s top hierarchy.

Hundreds of TTP insurgents had fled the military operations in the tribal regions of Bajaur, Mohmand and Malakand Division of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa to find a safe haven in the Afghan provinces of Kunar and Nuristan.

The exact number of TTP militants in Afghanistan is not known but Maj-Gen Abbas said that 200 to 300 militants have been mounting cross-border attacks in Dir and Chitral districts, suggesting they have a massive presence there.

“Militants from Bajaur and Mohmand are mostly based in Nuristan where they are hosted by an Afghan militant group, led by Qari Ziaur Rehman – a leader of the Salfi Taliban who are thought to be the closest ally of al Qaeda,” a senior military official told The Express Tribune requesting anonymity.

Salfi Islam is the bedrock of al Qaeda’s ideology, which is also followed by the Taliban controlling Kunar and Nuristan. This ideological convergence brought the two closer to each other.

Qari Zia is believed to be once a close confidante of Osama bin Laden and hosted him once after his epic escape from the Tora Bora mountains in 2001.

Peshawar-based security analyst Brigadier (retd) Muhamaad Saad believes the Taliban are not a monolithic entity. “They can be divided into three broad categories: Kandahari Taliban, led by Mullah Omar; Pakti Taliban, led by Jalaluddin Haqqani and his son Sirajuddin Haqqani; and Salfi Taliban,” he said. “It’s the Salfi Taliban who pose a real threat to Pakistan. They may not be obeying the Taliban supreme leader Mullah Omar.” But the Afghan Taliban deny any schisms in the movement. “All mujahideen are united under the leadership of Mullah Omar,” Taliban spokesperson Zabiullah Mujahid told The Express Tribune by phone from an undisclosed location in Afghanistan.

A respected cleric who runs an Islamic seminary in Shekandai, a village on the border between Chitral and Nuristan, endorses Mujahid’s claim. “There is no evidence of Qari Zia’s group defying the authority of Mullah Omar,” said Maulana Jamal Abdul Nasir.

Two years ago, the Nuristan Taliban had kidnapped a Greek professor from Chitral. And they had offered to free him in return for the release of three Afghan commanders – Ustad Yasir, the second-in-command of the 1980s jihadi leader Abdul Rasool Sayyaf, Maulana Rehmatuddin Nuristani, a local commander from Nuristan and Maulvi Abdullah Akhund from Kandahar.

“This shows there are no differences between the Salfi Taliban and those led by Mullah Omar,” said Maulana Nasir. The Afghan Taliban do not interfere in the affairs of Afghanistan’s neighbouring countries.  “No member of Taliban can go against the movement’s policy,” Mujahid said – blaming the TTP for all cross-border incursions. He also denied Qari Zia’s group was sheltering the TTP militants.

The governor of Nuristan province also appears to be exonerating the Afghan Taliban. “The Afghan Taliban have never carried out cross-border attacks in Pakistan,” Tameem Nuristani told The Express Tribune by phone from his home.

He also put the blame squarely on the TTP. “Look, they (Pakistani Taliban) have killed hundreds of people in bomb and suicide attacks across Pakistan, they’re Pakistan’s enemy,” he added. Nuristani, however, conceded that the TTP militants have found ‘safe havens’ in Kunar and Nuristan. Asked why the Afghan authorities do not move against them, Nuristani said, “Like Waziristan, we, too, have areas where the government’s writ does not exist.”

Scores of Pakistani military and paramilitary troops and policemen have been killed in cross-border raids by militants in Dir and Chitral districts. Last month, dozens of people were killed in militant attacks on security check posts in Chitral. And earlier this month, dozens of young men from Bajaur Agency were seized by TTP while they strayed across the border in Nuristan during an outing.

What is Pakistan doing to stop such raids?

“In Dir (Upper and Lower) extra troops have been deployed to man the border region. And in Chitral, new check posts are being set up at a bridge connecting the region with Afghanistan. We are sending huge reinforcements there,” said Maj-Gen Abbas.

The unnamed senior military official said the military was also encouraging formation of village defence committees in Chitral on the pattern of Amn committees (qaumi lashkars) in the tribal regions. But he conceded that local residents were unwilling to join, fearing reprisals from the militants.

Published in The Express Tribune

Lebanon Army Thwarts Smuggling of Tasers and I-Phones to Syria

Army Thwarts Smuggling of Tasers to Syria

by Naharnet Newsdesk
W460

The Lebanese army thwarted on Saturday an attempt to smuggle tasers and individual communication devices to Syria through an illegal border crossing at Deir al-Ashaer in the Rashayya region.

The National News Agency reported that the army halted a pickup truck loaded with equipment as it was attempting to enter Syria.

It confiscated the equipment and investigations are underway in the matter.

Uncle Sam’s decline and rise of China

Uncle Sam’s decline and rise of China

, TNN

The most enduring images of what is known as the “9/11 decade” are of suicide bombings, Predators, dead al-Qaeda leaders and new al-Qaeda leaders. But did we miss another, equally powerful image? Yes, that of China, growing unhindered and becoming a superpower in its own right, when the US was busy fighting its wars?

Ten years since 9/11, the jury is still out on whether the US is winning the war against al-Qaida. But there is no doubt that in the past decade the world has found a new fulcrum. As Lionel Barber wrote in the ‘FT’ , the three most important words in the last decade was not “war on terror” but “made in China” . Derek Scissors, economist at conservative think tank, Heritage Foundation says, “The US met the narrow security challenge of 9/11 but meeting any security challenge has an economic component. The US lacked the political courage to pay the economic price, weakening America’s global position and making China a more serious challenger than it otherwise would be in 2011.” The year 2001 was the zenith of America’s unipolar status. Ten years later, the world is talking about Pax Sinica. After the 9/11 attacks, the US decided to go after the guys who planned and executed the terror plot. But instead of hot pursuit , US decided to go after Saddam Hussein in Iraq, which was a war of “choice” . But despite pouring billions into its war effort in Iraq and Afghanistan, al-Qaida and Talibanremain a potent threat to the US and a drain on an imploding US economy.

All this while, China stayed in the background. They did not have to spend murderous amounts of money, or send thousands of soldiers to die in a war where their main ally was also their main enemy. China retained its “all weather ” friendship with Pakistan - on the cheap. China never spent the kind of money America did in Pakistan, yet its influence with Islamabad was disproportionately high.

In Afghanistan, US-led ISAF was fighting the Taliban, China , meanwhile, was investing billions in copper mines. In 2007, Musharraf stormed the Lal Masjid in Islamabad after China protested at the abduction of its citizens; in 2011, Gen Kayani was advising the Afghan leadership to abandon the Americans and throw their lot with the Chinese.

Mohan Malik of the Asia-Pacific Centre for Security Studies says, “When historians look back in a few decades’ time, 2001 will be seen as marking the beginning of the end of the “unipolar moment” in history. This was the year when the sole superpower, the US, was challenged by both state and non-state actors – first by China in April 2001 via the EP-3 spy plane incident in the South China Sea, and then by al-Qaida via the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Though the US still stands as “first among equals” – China poses a far more potent challenge to the US than the Soviet Union ever did. The 9/11 attacks and Washington’s response to it have crippled the US economy.”

The US made some economic choices that led to the deterioration of its own economy. Scissors outlines them thus – US monetary stimulus in response to the expected economic impact of the 9/11 attacks lasted far too long and weakened the entire world economy, including China ; to buy support for the Iraq invasion, President Bush implemented an expansionary fiscal policy, which weakened the US; the cost of the war on terror weakened the US, because a war should have necessitated cutbacks elsewhere which did not happen.

At the end of the decade, America was withdrawing from Iraq without the confidence that it would stabilise in the way it was intended. Al-Qaida and Taliban are being led from Pakistan, which means that even with a 2014 withdrawal deadline, there is no certainty that victory is in sight. Meanwhile, the US economy is in shambles , its politics is in a worse logjam than in India , it owes over $1.5 trillion to China, and its public debt is at $14 trillion.

China has overcome the financial crisis fairly successfully. The US preoccupation in the Middle East and south-central Asia left the Chinese to concentrate on its military modernisation. The Afghan war showed China how high technology , special forces, unmanned UAVs could wage successful wars. China’s military budgets went into overdrive in the decade past, as the US concentrated on fighting terrorism. Diplomatically, too, China spread its influence in Asia and beyond. this was helped along by a general distaste for American methods in the affected countries, its neglect of many allies, and certainly in Asia, the relative cooling of ties between Washington and Seoul and Washington and Tokyo.

But China’s overreach may have negated some of those gains for Beijing in the past few years. Its assertiveness in south China Sea, over the Cheonan and Senkaku/Diaoyutai islands have angered and alarmed its neighbourhood, who are once again looking at the US as the balancer . Malik adds, “Convinced that the US hegemony and Western politico-military dominance are now in an irreversible process of decline and final disappearance, China is becoming increasingly assertive on the international stage in ways that are inconsistent with regional peace, global stability and Indian interests.”

Dean Cheng, a China security analyst, believes despite its big bucks in military modernisation , China may still seem less of a challenge. “The US now has arguably the most battle-hardened military in the world. Its small-unit commanders are probably more familiar with not only combat, but diplomacy, than any other military. China has now gone 40 years without fighting a war.”

In the past few years, Indian strategists have fretted that US over-exposure in Afghanistan could see a China challenge grow, which would be against Indian interests. But while China will certainly continue to become more powerful, it may be a while before US is ready to relinquish hegemony to China.

Russia will send two nuclear-powered submarines to protect the island’s right to exploration

“Russia will send two nuclear-powered submarines to protect the island’s right to exploration in its maritime zone.”

Hurriyet Daily News

ROBERT ELLIS

History has a habit of repeating itself, also in Cyprus. In 1964 escalating hostilities between the two communities led to the threat of war between Greece and Turkey. Both the United States and the Soviet Union were aware that they faced the most dangerous confrontation since the Cuban missile crisis the year before, but disaster was finally averted.

Now Greek Cyprus faces a new confrontation with Turkey, but this time with American, Russian, Greek and Israeli support. In 2007 the Republic of Cyprus concluded agreements with Egypt and Lebanon delineating their respective maritime boundaries and exclusive economic zones, and last year a similar agreement was concluded with Israel.

The bone of contention between Turkey and Greek Cyprus concerns the latter’s sovereign right, based on the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, to carry out exploration and drill for hydrocarbons in its exclusive economic zone. Turkey, which is not among the 162 states which have signed the convention, claims that it has rights in an area which runs from its southern coast to the northern coast of Egypt.

In November 2008 Norwegian exploration vessels were harassed by Turkish warships off the southern coast of Cyprus, which caused the country to block the opening of the energy chapter in Turkey’s accession talks. Foreign Minister Markos Kyprianou accused Turkey of behaving “like the neighborhood bully,” and Turkey’s chief EU negotiator, Egemen Bağış, in turn said that “a small sunshine member state” was obstructing Europe’s energy needs.

Three years ago a U.S. company, Noble Energy, received a concession to explore for hydrocarbons in Cyprus’ exclusive economic zone, and accordingly plans to begin drilling for natural gas on Oct. 1. Last month Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu stated that Turkey would show “the appropriate reaction” if any further step is taken; meanwhile, an appeal to the United States to take action has been rebuffed.

Greek Cyprus has received support both from Russia and Israel and according to a recent report Russia will send two nuclear-powered submarines to protect the island’s right to exploration in its maritime zone. It is also reported that the Turkish navy and air force are planning exercises in the area beginning Sept. 15.

The Republic of Cyprus now has its back to the wall. With regard to the ongoing reunification talks, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has told the two leaders, Dimitris Christofias and Derviş Eroğlu, to reach convergence on all core issues by the end of October. Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has also made it clear that if a settlement is not reached by 2012, Turkey will consider “different alternatives.”

On July 11 another bombshell was dropped, almost literally. Some 98 containers of Iranian munitions, confiscated from a Cypriot-flagged Russian freighter on its way to Syria at the end of January 2009 and then stored in an open field, exploded. The explosion not only destroyed the nearby Vassiliko power station, which provided more than half Greek Cyprus’ energy, but also the Greek Cypriots’ confidence in their president.

A classified report leaked to the Greek Cypriot daily Simerini reveals that the government had received offers of help to dispose of the cargo from the U.S., Britain, France and Germany but refused. Instead, at a meeting between Christofias and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in September 2009, Christofias had assured Assad that the cargo would remain in Cyprus until it could be returned to either Syria or Iran.

According to a cable from the U.S. ambassador in Cyprus, since the election of Christofias in 2008, “we have witnessed an ideologically-motivated attempt to turn back the clock to the heydays of the nonaligned movement. He has publicly praised Fidel Castro, welcomed a new Venezuelan Embassy to Nicosia, lauded Iran, and vilified NATO and the Partnership for Peace.”

Next July the Republic of Cyprus will take over the EU term presidency, so it would be unfortunate if the island once again becomes the scene of a Cold War-style confrontation.

*Robert Ellis is advisor to the Turkey Assessment Group in the European Parliament.