Yemen Intelligence Agency Hit By Car-Bomb, 3rd Spy Agency Bombed

Yemen’s intelligence service hit with deadly attack

A man takes a photo of smoke rising from the site of an attack on the Political Security Agency building, the headquarters of the Yemeni intelligence services in the southern provinces, in the southern Yemeni city of Aden August 18, 2012.

At least 14 Yemeni soldiers have been killed in an attack on the intelligence service headquarters in the port city of Aden. Officials report that machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades were used in the attack.

A security official who anonymously spoke to the AFP news agency said the attack “is the work of al Qaeda elements.”

The Yemeni Defense Ministry said that armed gunmen attacked the intelligence service headquarters from two directions. One attack came at an entrance of an adjacent building used by the state television station.

A car bomb was also reportedly driven through an entrance into the courtyard of the building and then detonated. Rocket-propelled grenades were also launched at the building.

The perpetrators in the attack were able to get away, and a number of soldiers and three employees of the state television service were wounded.

The United States has backed Yemen in its effort to combat militants within its borders, notably by increasing drone strikes on suspected members of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

mz/slk (Reuters, dpa, AFP)

US proxy war in Syria spreads to Lebanon and Iraq

US proxy war in Syria spreads to Lebanon and Iraq

By Eric London 

The intensifying proxy war in Syria is causing increased anxiety throughout the Middle East, where the specters of sectarian war and Western military intervention loom large. A series of kidnappings threatens to drag Lebanon deeper into the 17-month-long civil war in neighboring Syria, while 93 people were killed in Iraq on Thursday.

Al Qaeda’s role as a partner in a US-led Sunni sectarian war against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is apparently strengthening its operations in Iraq. Some 190 people were killed by Al Qaeda attacks in Iraq over the last two-and-a-half weeks.

“The religious legitimacy of the Syria war and the increase of funding and fighters almost unquestionably benefits Al Qaeda in Iraq,” said Seth Jones, an Al Qaeda expert and counterterrorism expert with the RAND Corporation. “It is heavily involved in overseeing the war in Syria.”

Hundreds more Iraqis were killed in June and July, making the last three months the deadliest in over a year. Two weeks ago, over a dozen neighborhood officials resigned their posts in Baquba, citing fears that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki cannot prevent a resurgence of Al Qaeda in Iraq.

The conflict is also escalating in Lebanon, where deep-seated sectarian tensions are coming to the surface in a nation wrought with unresolved political discord.

On Tuesday night, masked gunmen belonging to the mostly Shia Muqdad tribe kidnapped over 20 alleged members of the Free Syrian Army in Beirut. The kidnapping was in retaliation for Monday’s kidnapping in Damascus of a member of the Muqdad family by anti-Assad forces in Syria. They accused Hassan Salim al-Muqdad of being a Hezbollah agent and supporting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, a claim Hezbollah and the Muqdad family denied.

The Syrian regime’s political and military support for Hezbollah—a Lebanese Shiite organization that repelled an Israeli attack in a 2006 war—is a key reason behind Washington’s strategy of seeking Assad’s overthrow. For its part, Hezbollah fears that, in the event of Assad’s overthrow by Sunni militias, it would rapidly be isolated, cut off from its sources of weapons and financing, and threatened with destruction.

Speaking yesterday, Hezbollah leader Hasan Nasrallah warned Israel: “War with Lebanon would be very, very, very costly … When our country is attacked, we will not wait for permission from anyone.” He warned that Hezbollah would fire volleys of precision-guided missiles at Israel, which could “turn the lives of hundreds of thousands of Zionists into hell.”

“What happened … is a clear indication that we are [on] the brink of major chaos in Lebanon,” a senior political Lebanese government source told Lebanon’s the Daily Star on Thursday. “The storm in Syria has reached Lebanon now and there is no going back.”

Other Shia tribes in eastern Lebanon have since followed up on the retaliatory attack, kidnapping at least eight more alleged fighters of the anti-Assad Free Syrian Army (FSA). AP also reports that a Syrian businessman and supporter of Assad was kidnapped on Thursday by soldiers in the Bekaa Valley town of Chtoura.

Earlier this month, FSA fighters captured 48 Iranians in Damascus. The FSA kidnapped 11 Iranian pilgrims in February, and five Iranian technicians were kidnapped last December in Homs.

The kidnappings reflect the sectarian divide between the largely Shia or Christian backers of Assad and the mainly Sunni supporters of the Syrian opposition. May and June saw armed clashes between Sunni and Shia in Tripoli and Beirut. Although Lebanon has been involved in the Syrian conflict for months via arms trade and minor cross border raids, the Syrian war now threatens to ignite a full-scale civil war in Lebanon.

“This … brings us back to the days of the painful war, a page that Lebanese citizens have been trying to turn,” said Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati, referring to the 1975-1990 civil war that resulted, amongst other things, in a three-decade Syrian occupation.

Mikati is a member of the March 8th Alliance, a parliamentary coalition that includes Hezbollah and currently rules Lebanon. The coalition and the Lebanese state in general rest on a precarious balance between the nation’s Sunni, Shia, Alawite, Druze, Maronite, and Orthodox factions. The government has already surrendered de facto control of many areas of Eastern Lebanon to Shia tribes like the Muqdad.

Beirut political commentator Rami Khouri explained the limits of the government’s ability to control civil strife: “The Lebanese state is not a powerful centralized state. You have people outside the control of the state, whether it’s Hezbollah or small groups like these family-based militias … The worry is that these incidents can escalate and get out of hand. Then you end up with armed conflict in the street.”

Lebanese security forces arrested former Information Minister Michel Samaha on August 9 for allegedly plotting to incite sectarian violence through “terrorist attacks” against Sunnis together with top Syrian Army officers.

Robert Fisk, the Independent’s correspondent in the Middle East, noted that the charges against Samaha were made “without a thread of evidence publicly revealed.”

In a further indication of the escalating conflict, Samir Geagea, the leader of Lebanese Forces, has called for the declaration of a state of emergency. Lebanese Forces, a right-wing Christian group, is the second most powerful political party in the opposition March 14th Alliance—a group which opposes Syrian influence and backs anti-Assad forces in Syria.

“The image formed in every citizen’s mind now is that Lebanon is an uncontrollable state with no authority, constitution or rules whatsoever,” said Geagea at a press conference on Friday. “No matter how righteous and decent their cause was, nothing justifies what happened, as it paralyzed the country and annulled the state’s role.”

In response to the heightened risks, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar are advising their citizens to leave Lebanon as quickly as possible.

The United States and Turkey issued travel warnings for Lebanon on Friday in response to the kidnapping of a Turkish business man who was among the more than 20 people captured Wednesday by the Muqdad tribe.

“The US embassy has received reports of an increased possibility of attacks against US citizens in Lebanon,” an embassy statement read. “Possible threats include kidnapping, the potential for an upsurge in violence, the escalation of family or neighborhood disputes, as well as US citizens being the target of terrorist attacks in Lebanon.”

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius made a visit to Lebanon. According to the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, he met with “the highest Lebanese officials: the president prime minister, speaker of the parliament and minister of foreign affairs. He will meet with humanitarian actors. He will also speak to opposition figures.”

The Obama administration is also ratcheting up its involvement in Lebanon, criticizing Hezbollah for giving “extensive support to the Syrian government’s violent suppression of the Syrian people,” according to David Cohen, undersecretary of the Treasury for terrorism and financial intelligence. “[It] exposes the true nature of this terrorist organization and its destabilizing presence in the region.”

These claims are hypocritical. The US and its allies have been funneling vast amounts of cash and weapons, through the CIA and other intelligence agencies, to Sunni sectarian groups waging war in Syria. This war is now spreading beyond the borders of Syria, threatening to plunge the entire region into a bloodbath.

In Search of Honesty and True Islam In the Tunisian Aftermath

[The two videos given below (one just a link) highlight the hypocritical contradictory ideas within modern "Islamist" thinking and within popular notions about Muslims, in general.  In the first video, the Moroccan writer/activist strives to increase Muslim awareness of inalienable basic freedoms and human rights, fighting to correct false, opinionated assumptions which guide the popular dialogue about Muslims, as well.  The second video highlights the other  more extreme end of the ideological spectrum; it is a video of a Tunisian "Islamist" (probably one of Obama's boys) beheading a man for converting to Christianity.  The essence of the "Arab Spring" liberation movement is an expression somewhere in between these two extremes.  The dark forces of Empire will do everything within their vast range of powers to prevent any true liberation movement in the MENA region from regaining their footing and finding this clarity of vision.  The rest of us in the Western world, who want to see them succeed, will do all that we can to support them, as they search about in the dark for answers. Christians would do well to emulate their struggle for self-expression and toseek-out such a spiritual re-clarification of the meaning of True Christianity.]

Middle East-North Africa: Secularism Vs. Hypocrisy And Doublethink

Washington / Morocco News Board—  At a Conference in Ontario, Canada, Mr. Ahmed Benchemsi, Moroccan Journalist  and Stanford Visiting Scholar, spoke about the challenges the people and the secularist movements confront in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA).He appealed for what he called “secularism from within” to replace the hypocrisy and doublethink that defines what people across the Arab world understand themselves to be.

He described how Muslims who live by modern secular values are an under-discussed reality in the MENA region, where people are compelled to mentally divorce how they actually live from how they believe people ought to live.

Across the MENA region – despite laws prohibiting everything from premarital sex to alcohol consumption – a powerful sub-culture practices these activities while suffering from a overwhelming sense of guilt for not living up to the ideals encoded in their laws.

So how does a culture live with these contradictions? Benchemsi answered that it is done through an “insane internal dialogue by which Islam is not the defining paradigm of these societies – hypocrisy is.”

From Benchemsi’s experience, the best way this region can overcome this schizophrenic internal monologue is by authentically describing the present – he describes this concept as “secularism from within.” In other words, they should describe the lives they live, expunge the guilt felt for breaking and disobeying unrealistic rules, and adopt the label of secularism to cultivate the individual freedom that is inextricable from democracy.

He concluded that secularism from within is really honesty from within. He believes that is what young seculars should begin practicing, for “a society based on lying and cheating is not sustainable in the long term”. Honesty is a revolutionary force. If secularists can label and practice honesty, who knows? They might win.

 

         توفيق عكاشة يعرض جريمة الإخوان بقتل مواطن بتونس

Thumbnail
The following content has been identified by the YouTube community as being potentially offensive or inappropriate. Viewer discretion is advised.
By Lawrence D. Jones , Christian Post Reporter

A graphic video of a Christian man being beheaded by Muslim extremists for converting from Islam to Christianity was recently shown on talk shows in Canada and Egypt. Footage of the incident, which reportedly took place in Tunisia, shows a young man being held down like “an animal” with a knife to his throat.

“There is a video on the web right now showing a man having his head cut off slowly and agonizingly, essentially because he has converted to Christianity from Islam,” said Michael Coren, host of Canadian program The Arena.

Video footage of the incident shows a young man being held down by masked men. His neck is pulled back, with a knife to his throat. One of the masked men, who was not in the camera’s view, chants a number of Muslim prayers in Arabic, mostly condemning Christianity.

The man holding the knife begins to cut to the cries of “Allahu Akbar!” (or “God is great!”), as the victim appears to be mouthing a prayer. The slicing takes about two minutes before the beheading is complete–upon which they shouted more Islamic cries and slogans of victory.

Coren called the video “grotesque” but said it was not “unique,” as more people are being killed for their religious faith in the Middle East.

“There are many, many videos like this,” said Coren. “It’s usually Christians, sometimes, others. It’s always Muslims, generally Sunni mostly, but Shiite too, who are doing this. Cutting off the head is a form of punishment.”

Human rights and religious freedom activists are bringing attention to the brutality of the footage but note that these violent killings are being more common, especially in the post Arab-Spring order.

Rev. Majed El Sahfie, founder of One Free World International, listed several of the faith-related killings, including a Catholic priest who was killed in Tunisia, a man whose ears were cut off in Egypt, and an American teacher who was killed in Yeme after being accused of converting people to Christianity.

Sahfie, who is also a Christian convert from Islam, said that Muslim extremists are filling in the political vacuum that was left after the fall of dictatorships in Tunisia, Egypt and Yemen

Responding to Muslim clerics who have criticized discussion on the video as “propaganda for the Christian,”Sahfie said, “If he is a Christian or Jewish or Muslim, Sunni or Shia, Hindu or Buddha, I would act the same way.”

“I hope a video like this will bring alive on the massacre that will happen on minorities in the Middle East very, very soon,” he said.

Barnabas Aid, a ministry which delivers relief for the persecuted church, is asking Christians to pray over incident as a prayer topic in the month of July.

“Give thanks to God for our Tunisian brother’s life and his faith that would not waver, even unto death. Pray that his witness will touch the hearts of his killers and those who have seen the footage of his death and that they will turn to Christ,” the ministry wrote in its Prayer Focus update.

The prayer topic request also included a Bible verse: “Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone among your people, but love your neighbour as yourself. I am the LORD (Leviticus 19:18, NIV).”

WATCH PART OF THE GRAPHIC VIDEO SHOWING BEHEADING (Warning! Video Includes Distrubing Footage):

Robert Blake In Tashkent Seeking To Capitalize On CSTO Loss, Promoting NATO Alternative Quick Reaction Force

U.S. explores Uzbekistan’s real position on participation in military organizations

Azerbaijan, Baku, Aug. 17 / Trend V. Zhavoronkova /

One of the main goals of U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia Robert Blake’s visit to Uzbekistan was to explore the real position of Uzbekistan, concerning the country’s participation in international military organizations, the U.S. expert on Central Asia Bruce Pannier believes.

Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs Robert O. Blake Jr. has been to Tashkent, Uzbekistan from August 15 to 18. According to the report, in Tashkent, Assistant Secretary Blake will lead the U.S. delegation for the third United States-Uzbekistan Annual Bilateral Consultations.

The expert said Blake’s presence in Tashkent at that time reinforces the U.S. interest in boosting trade relations with Uzbekistan.

“But, of course every visit by a U.S. official to Uzbekistan for more than a decade now has focused on the situation in Afghanistan and Blake was in Uzbekistan for several days, surely to discuss security issues”, Pannier, an expert of Radio Liberty, told Trend on Friday.

He added, this time Blake wanted to know more about the recently adopted bill in the lower house of parliament that sets out new foreign policy rules – namely, that Uzbekistan will not be a part of any military blocs and will not allow foreign military bases on its territory.

“The bill is certain to pass when it comes to the Senate at the end of the month and then be signed by President Karimov,” Pannier said.

The analyst believes many foreign players now want to know what it means.

“Uzbekistan did just withdraw from the CIS Collective Security Treaty Organization and it was known for the last few years one of the disagreements Tashkent had with the CSTO was the organization’s plans for a rapid reaction force, to include troops from all the member countries, to be deployed in any member country under threat,” he said.

Blake would probably be interested in hearing Uzbek officials, President Karimov first of all, explain the motive or logic from withdrawing from the CSTO again, Pannier said.

Uzbekistan already did so in 1999, and then it returned back.

“And the big question is what this new policy means for the base the Germans use at Termez and the Navoi airport the U.S. uses to refuel as well as the Northern Distribution Network into Afghanistan,” he added.

The drawdown the U.S. and NATO say will be completed by 2014 never meant all the foreign troops were leaving Afghanistan and those foreign forces that do remain will still need to be re-supplied, expert mentioned.

“Uzbekistan is key to resupplying those forces since the best railway link through Central Asia to Afghanistan goes through Uzbekistan,” Pannier said.

He added that the good news for the U.S. is that this bill establishing new boundaries for military alliances appears to be very flexible.

“The bill, as I understand it, does not preclude Uzbekistan from entering into a military alliance or allowing foreign forces to use Uzbekistan’s military facilities but it does say Uzbekistan is not bound by any agreement that becomes, in Tashkent’s view, disadvantageous to Uzbekistan,” the analyst said.

Uzbekistan can renounce any alliance or military agreement at a moment’s notice, he added.

As for future U.S.-Uzbek relations I think will remain at least as good as they are now for the next few years, Pannier added.

“Both countries need each other currently; the U.S because of supplying Afghanistan and Uzbekistan because it just aggravated ties with Russia by withdrawing from the CSTO and now needs a great power as an ally,” he said.

An important question now, the expert added, is what happens if the situation in Afghanistan becomes much worse after the 2014 drawdown and problems start spilling over the border into Central Asia.

“How much help could the U.S. be to Uzbekistan in such a situation and would it make more sense for Uzbekistan to mend ties with Russia and seek Moscow’s help to shore up security problems, is not clear,” Pannier said.

Do you have any feedback? Contact our journalist at agency@trend.az

Uzbekistan Seeks Islamic Development Bank Funds To Modernize Canal System Draining Remnants of Aral Sea

[Islam Karimov has his inherited Soviet-era canal system (which makes possible his annual cotton crop), which should never have been built in the first place.  Now he wants to "modernize" the crude system, in hopes of making it hold water.  To make any difference at all in the canal system's efficiency, the canals would have to either be lined, or poured in concrete.  As it now stands (and the primary reason that most of the Aral Sea simply evaporated away), much of the canal system is just a series of machine-dug, unlined, porous channels.  Water either seeps down through the bottom of the ditches, or out through the sides, where the hot Central Asian summers boil the transferred water away.  Uzbekistan should not be assisted in this endeavor, unless it would be assistance to create an alternative money source, other than the antiquated cotton farming industry, which demands all this water in the first place.]

Uzbekistan to Attract IDB Loan for Modernisation of Irrigation Systems

By D.Azizov

Uzbekistan plans to attract an Islamic Development Bank (IDB) loan to the sum of $60 million for the modernisation of irrigation systems in the Khorezm region (north-west), a source in government circles told Trend on Thursday.

He noted that at the present time, the government of Uzbekistan has reached a preliminary agreement with the management of IDB on a joint project for the modernisation of irrigation canals of Tashsakinsk system.

Under the agreement, the Uzbek side will complete the development and coordination of the project’s feasibility study by the end of August in order to submit the project to the IDB board of directors for consideration in September.

The project worth $90.3 million provides an uninterrupted supply of water to irrigated land with total area of ​​26 hectares. It is expected that the IDB loan will be granted for a term of 20 years, including a four-year grace period under istisna.

In June 2011 the IDB and the Uzbek government signed a cooperation programme for 2011-2013, envisaging the allocation of loans totalling $655.5 million.

These funds will be spent to implement 11 projects in infrastructure development such as health, education and private business, worth about $1 billion.

Uzbekistan joined the IDB in 2003. During this time the bank allocated about $300 million for the country to implement 15 projects in the field of health, education, agriculture, energy, transport and support for private entrepreneurship.

Trend Az

Russia Not Letting New Syria Troubleshooter Ignore Kofi Annan’s Pacification Plan

Russia expects Syria envoy to build on Annan plan: ministry

Lakhdar Brahimi. (AFP PHOTO/GIUSEPPE CACACE)

Lakhdar Brahimi. (AFP PHOTO/GIUSEPPE CACACE)

MOSCOW: Russia welcomed the new international envoy for the conflict in Syria and said it expected him build on the work of predecessor Kofi Annan, the foreign ministry said in a statement Saturday.

“We proceed on the assumption that Lakhdar Brahimi will base his work on the platform of the existing ‘road map’ of a Syrian settlement — Kofi Annan’s peace plan and the final communique of the June ministerial meeting of the Action Group on Syria in Geneva and also on the relevant UN security council resolutions,” the ministry said.

Russia added it was “ready for close interaction with the new special representative of the United Nations and the Arab League on Syria with the aim of overcoming the crisis in Syria.”

It said it counted on Brahimi to “continue contacts with all Syrian sides, inducing them to cease violence as soon as possible and to the start of a political dialogue on the future of the country.”

The Kremlin had endorsed Annan’s plan and also backed his initiative at a June meeting in Geneva that called for a political transition in Syria while making no explicit call for President Bashar al-Assad to step down.

Russia along with China has prompted fury from Western nations with three vetoes of UN Security Council resolutions on Syria which condemned Assad’s assault on protesters and threatened sanctions.

Russia has accused the United States and its allies of simply seeking to oust the current regime, Moscow’s closest Middle East ally, a trading partner and the host of a Russian naval base in the eastern Mediterranean.

- AFP/cc

Israel’s “Existential Threat” from Iran Mere Blackmail To Counter Weapons Sales To Saudis

[There is little, to no chance, that Israeli officials were ever serious about this "bomb Iran" B.S.  This war hysteria whipped-up by the Zionist-dominated US and British media is just more typical blackmail coming from that little bastion of shit sitting atop the New Middle East.  This happens every time that Israel wants more weapons than we are willing to give, NOT SELL.  This is all about the greedy little Zionists wanting everything given to them.  They really believe that they deserve to rule the world.  

FUCK ISRAEL!]

נתניהו וברק. הגברת היכולת הצבאית של ישראל תניח את דעתם? (צילום: אליעד לוי)

Israel impatient to strike. (Photo: Eliad Levy)

‘US military aid would delay Israeli strike’

Arming Israel with extra military capabilities could allay its leaders’ impatience to strike Iran, thus buying time for diplomacy, Obama’s former national security adviser says

Yitzhak Benhorin

WASHINGTON - A former national security adviser to PresidentBarack Obama says that the United States should provide Israelwith the military aid that would sway its leaders to delay a strike on Iran‘s nuclear facilities.

Dennis B. Ross, who served as a special assistant to Obama for the Middle East and South Asia from 2009 to 2011, says in an opinion piece published by the New York Times on Friday that by bolstering Israel’s military capabilities with “additional bunker-busting bombs, tankers for refueling aircraft and targeting information,” the US could allay the Jewish state’s impatience to attack the Islamic Republic.

Ross, a veteran diplomat well versed in negotiating with senior Israeli officials, states that while both Israel and the US share the goal of preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, they differ in their estimated deadline for military action.

“The United States has significantly greater military might than Israel and therefore feels that it can wait substantially longer than Israel before resorting to force,” he writes. “Israel is less patient.”

Civilian nuclear power acceptable

The former State Department and National Security Council official uses his op-ed to lay out a four-point plan meant to “synchronize the American and Israeli clocks” on the military option. The first order of business, he says, is to draft proposal that would allow Iran to maintain nuclear power for civilian purposes only. The proposal would be used as a framework for talks with the Islamic Republic.

The second step in Ross’ plan calls for the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Germany (the P5+1) to start devising a strategy for the event that diplomacy fails and force becomes necessary.

Ross asserts that neither Israel nor the US can destroy Iran’s ability to eventually develop atom weapons, which is why force can only be used in conjuncture with measures that would keep Tehran isolated and under severe economic sanctions that would make it “less able and less willing” to rebuild its nuclear program.

Third, Washington should ask Jerusalem which military capabilities they need to delay a strike. And finally, Ross suggests that the White House should ask Prime MinisterBenjamin Netanyahu ”what sort of support he would need from the United States if he chose to use force – for example, resupply of weapons, munitions, spare parts, military and diplomatic backing, and help in terms of dealing with unexpected contingencies.”

Ross states that in return for Israel’s agreement to push the attack until next year, the US should make firm commitments on all accounts.

“Although some may argue that these actions will make a military strike more likely next year, they are almost certainly needed now in order to give Israel’s leaders a reason to wait,” he says.

Text Rumors Fuel Panic Exodus from Northeastern Indian Assam Province

Panic Radiates From Distant Indian Region

Jagadeesh Nv/European Pressphoto Agency

People from northeastern India boarded a train bound for Guwahati, in Assam State, at a railway station in Bangalore on Thursday. More Photos 

By 

BRAJAKHAL, India — Like a fever, fear has spread across India this week, from big cities like Bangalore to smaller places like Mysore, a contagion fueling a message: Run. Head home. Flee. And that is what thousands of migrants from the country’s distant northeastern states are doing, jamming into train stations in an exodus challenging the Indian ideals of tolerance and diversity.

What began as an isolated communal conflict here in the remote state of Assam, a vicious if obscure fight over land and power between Muslims and the indigenous Bodo tribe, has unexpectedly set off widespread panic among northeastern migrants who had moved to more affluent urban cities for a piece of India’s rising prosperity.

A swirl of unfounded rumors, spread by text messages and social media, has warned of attacks by Muslims against northeastern migrants, prompting the panic and the exodus. Indian leaders, deeply alarmed, have pleaded for calm, and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh appeared in Parliament on Friday to denounce the rumor mongering and offer reassurance to northeastern migrants.

“What is at stake is the unity and integrity of our country,” Mr. Singh said. “What is at stake is communal harmony.”

The hysteria in several of the country’s most advanced urban centers has underscored the deep roots of ethnic tensions in India, where communal conflict is usually simplified as Hindu versus Muslim yet is often far more complex. For decades, Indian leaders have mostly managed to isolate and triangulate regional ethnic conflicts, if not always resolve them, but the public panic this week is a testament to how the old strategies may be less effective in an information age.

Last week, the central government started moving to stabilize Assam, where at least 78 people have been killed and more than 300,000 have fled their homes for refugee camps. Then Muslims staged a large, angry protest in Mumbai, the country’s financial capital, on the western coast. A wave of fear began sweeping through northeastern migrants after several people from the northeast were beaten up in Pune, a city not far from Mumbai.

By Wednesday and Thursday, the exodus had begun. So many people were pouring into train stations in Bangalore and Chennai that the Railways Ministry later added special services to certain northeastern cities. By Friday, even as some of the fears eased in the biggest cities, people were leaving smaller cities, including Mysore and Mangalore.

To many northeastern migrants, the impulse to rush home — despite the trouble in Assam — is a reminder of how alienated many feel from mainstream India. The northeast, tethered to the rest of the country by a narrow finger of land, has always been neglected. Populated by a complex mosaic of ethnic groups, the northeast has also been plagued by insurgencies and rivalries as different groups compete for power.

Here in Assam, the underlying frictions are over the control of land, immigrationpressures and the fight for political power. The savagery and starkness of the violence have been startling. Of the 78 people killed, some were butchered. More than 14,000 homes have been burned. That 300,000 people are in refugee camps is remarkable; had so many people fled across sub-Saharan Africa to escape ethnic persecution, a humanitarian crisis almost certainly would have been declared.

“If we go back and they attack us again, who will save us?” asked Subla Mushary, 35, who is now living with her two teenage daughters at a camp for Bodos. “I have visited my home. There is nothing left.”

Location of Assam in India

Assam, which has about 31 million people, has a long history of ethnic strife. The current violence is focused on the westernmost region of the state, which is claimed by the Bodos as their homeland. For years, Bodo insurgent groups fought for political autonomy, with some seeking statehood and others seeking to create an independent Bodo nation.

In 2003, India’s central government, then led by the Bharatiya Janata Party, brokered a deal in which Bodo insurgents agreed to cease their rebellions in exchange for the creation of a special autonomous region, now known as the Bodoland Territorial Autonomous Districts. It was a formula long used by Indian leaders to subdue regional rebellions: persuade rebels to trade the power of the gun for the power of the ballot box.

Now the Bodos dominate the government overseeing the autonomous districts, even though they are not a majority, accounting for about 29 percent of a population otherwise splintered among Muslims, other indigenous tribal groups, Hindus and other native Assamese. Competition over landownership is a source of rivalry and resentment: the land rights of Muslims are tightly restricted inside the special districts, even though they constitute the region’s second-largest group, after the Bodos.

“This whole fight is about land and capturing power,” said Maulana Badruddin Ajmal, a member of Parliament and a Muslim leader in a neighboring district. “It is not a religious fight.”

These resentments exploded in July and early August, after an escalating cycle of attacks between Muslims and Bodos. Soon entire villages were being looted and burned. The authorities have made few arrests, and each side has blamed the other. The Bodos say illegal Muslim immigrants from Bangladesh are streaming into the autonomous districts and taking over vacant land, and Muslims say such claims are a smokescreen intended to disguise a Bodo campaign to drive out rightful Muslim residents in a campaign similar to ethnic cleansing.

During the worst violence, the state government in Assam seemed paralyzed. One issue is that many former Bodo rebels never turned over their automatic weapons; some Muslims driven from their homes say Bodos scared them off by firing AK-47s into the air.

To visit some of the affected villages is to witness the eerie silence of lives brutally interrupted. In Brajakhal, the entire Muslim section was burned and looted, while the homes of non-Muslims were left untouched. In the nearby village of Chengdala, each side apparently attacked the other — both the Bodo and Muslim homes are destroyed, with a handful of others left standing.

Sumitra Nazary, a Bodo woman, said her elderly father was bludgeoned to death with an ax.

“He was paralyzed,” she said. “He couldn’t run away.”

It is uncertain when the people in the refugee camps will be able to return to their villages. Paramilitary units and Assam police officers have erected temporary guard posts outside many of the destroyed or looted villages, promising security. Meanwhile, Assam’s chief minister ordered refugees to begin returning to their homes this week, even as new violence was reported in some areas.

At the camps, life is increasingly miserable. This week, two members of the National Commission for Minorities visited the region and documented problems with sanitation, malnutrition and living conditions at different camps, particularly those inhabited by Muslims. One camp had 10 makeshift toilets for 4,300 people. At another camp, they reported, more than 6,500 people were crammed into a converted high school, including 30 pregnant women.

The scene was little different at a Muslim refugee camp created at the Srirampur R.M.E. School. More than 5,200 people were living on the grounds, crowded under the shade of trees to hide from the broiling midday sun.

Goi Mohammad Sheikh, 39, had delivered his wife and five children to the camp but was returning to their village at night to protect their home. It had been looted but not burned, he said, and he and a group of other men were standing guard.

“We want to protect our houses,” he said. “In some villages, it will not be possible to go back. It is too dangerous. But we will not leave our village. If they kill us, let them kill us. How do we leave our motherland?”

 

Hari Kumar contributed reporting from Brajakhal.

Russia issues warning to Britain over Assange

Russia issues warning to Britain over Assange

A supporter of Julian Assange demonstrates outside the Ecuadoran embassy in London on August 17. (AFP/Will Oliver)

A supporter of Julian Assange demonstrates outside the Ecuadoran embassy in London on August 17. (AFP/Will Oliver)

MOSCOW: Russia on Friday warned Britain against violating fundamental diplomatic principles after London suggested it could arrest WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange inside Ecuador’s embassy.

“What is happening gives grounds to contemplate the observance of the spirit and the letter of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, and in particular the Article 22 spelling out the inviolability of diplomatic premises,” the Russian foreign ministry said.

Ecuador on Thursday granted asylum to Assange – whose website enraged the United States by publishing a vast cache of confidential government files – but Britain has vowed not to grant him safe passage out of the country.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague has said his government was obliged under its own law to extradite the Australian national to Sweden, where he is wanted for questioning over alleged sex crimes.

Britain has angered Ecuador by suggesting it could invoke a domestic law allowing it to breach the usual rules and go in to arrest Assange, who has been holed up in Ecuador’s London mission since June.

This would challenge a fundamental principle of the diplomatic system, and the threat has left Britain in unchartered legal waters.

At the same time, Moscow warned Britain against interpreting the law selectively, stressing that London has given refuge to “dozens of people suspected of committing grave crimes” who are wanted in other countries.

“What to do with a right to refuge for Julian Assange when London turns the observance of this right for this category of people into an absolute principle?” the Russian foreign ministry asked, referring to a number of high-profile figures granted asylum in Britain.

Russia has for years sought the extradition of top Kremlin critic Boris Berezovsky as well as several other figures.

- AFP/de

Russia’s secret torpedoes sold to Iran from Kirghizia?

“The solid-rocket propelled torpedo achieves a high velocity of 230 mph (386 kmh) by producing an envelope of supercavitating bubbles from its nose and skin”

Russia’s secret torpedoes sold to Iran from Kirghizia?

 

 

Russia's secret torpedoes sold to Iran from Kirghizia?26.01.2011

Text: VPK.name
Photo: Shkval torpedo. world-weapons.ru

Editorial staff of Russian news agency REGNUM obtained unverified information that components of secret torpedoes Shkval which are currently in service at Russian Navy were sold to Iran last year.

According to the source, the deliveries were carried out in 2010. Components of the Russian naval weapon were illegally sold from Dastan plant located in Bishkek, Kirghizia. Aside from commercial goods, this instrument engineering plant has been producing torpedo elements since Soviet times.

In recent years 53% shares of Dastan were held by the circle of ex-president Bakiev. In accordance with intergovernmental agreements of 2009, Russia planned to acquire shares of Dastan in exchange for a $180-mln debt relief and a $2-bln investment credit.

Despite the fact that Russia transfered the first tranche on time and in full ($300 mln arrived in Kirghizian budget in mid-2009), shares were not transferred then. After change of power in Apr 2010, new leaders of the country confirmed intentions to transfer the shares to Russia. However, the situation has not been changed so far – the plant’s shares have not been transferred to Russia.

Note that numerous scandals have recently blazed up around leadership of the plant. At first, Kirghizian media reported about an incident in Manas International Airport when the plant’s chief engineer allegedly was almost got off the plane by security authorities. Simultaneously, it was reported that the national procuracy launched an inquiry into “the instances of fraud and illegally held tender”. Later on, it was reported of wage arrears in the plant. Here is how it was described by the local news agencies: “According to the Ministry of State Property, there was $2.66 mln on account of JSC Dastan prior to appointment of new directors. As for employees, by Aug 2010 these funds had been completely spent, although it is uncertain for what exactly”.

On Dec 28, 2010 the president of Dastan Corporation Sergei Danilenko was arrested and placed in pre-trial detention center. A bit earlier, Kirghizian law-enforcement agencies arrested chief engineer of JSC TNK Dastan Boris Udot (court changed the measure of restraint with house arrest). According to unverified information, apart from financial violations, the company directors were charged of “illegal deliveries of special-purpose devices”.

For over a year Kirghizian side has been explaining time delay in share transfer as “confusions and irregularities while the plant’s privatization”.

Dastan plant produces warhead elements for Shkval-type torpedoes which can be made both in nuclear (up to 150 kiloton yield) and conventional (210 kg of chemical explosives) variants. According to sources of Nezavisimaya Gazeta, “it is hard to overestimate significance of this kind of weapon for Russia, especially after ratification of new Strategic Offensive Arms Reduction Treaty… Shkval torpedoes are in service on surface ships and submarines of Russian Navy. Experts say the world had not seen a torpedo comparable to Shkval in speed for a long time. Only in 2005 Germany managed to create a Shkval-like torpedo…”