Zionists Win Again

US Drops Demand for Israel Building Freeze in Occupied E. J’lem

Readers Number : 0

27/08/2009 The Obama administration has agreed to Israel’s request to remove occupied East Jerusalem from negotiations on the impending settlement freeze. According to both Israeli officials and Western diplomats, U.S. envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell has recognized the fact that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu cannot announce a settlement freeze in occupied East Jerusalem. The officials said the U.S. will not endorse new construction there, but would not demand Tel Aviv publicly announce a freeze.

Netanyahu presented a proposal on Wednesday for resolving the ongoing Israeli-American dispute over construction in the settlements. In a meeting with Mitchell, Netanyahu suggested a temporary freeze, reportedly for nine months, on construction in the West Bank, a government source said.

Netanyahu also said that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’ reported willingness to meet with him was “a positive first step.”

The Americans are slated to respond to Netanyahu’s proposal at a meeting in Washington next week between Mitchell and two Israeli officials: Netanyahu’s envoy, attorney Yitzhak Molcho, and Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak’s chief of staff, Brig. Gen. Mike Herzog.

Mitchell himself will return to Tel Aviv in the second week of September with the goal of finalizing an agreement.

The new Israeli proposal will exclude some 2,500 housing units on which construction has already started.

Additionally, in special cases where it is necessary to keep “normal life,” Netanyahu wants to be able to erect public buildings in the settlements – mainly kindergartens and schools.

Finally, Israel wants the freeze to have a clear “exit plan.” In Israel’s view, the freeze is a confidence-building measure that must be matched by reciprocal steps from the PA and Arab states. If these fail to materialize, Israel wants an American guarantee that it will not oppose renewed building.

Following their meeting, Mitchell and Netanyahu issued a brief joint statement saying that “good progress” had been made, and the talks would continue.

However, the statement also included that the two “agreed on the importance of restarting meaningful negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians and working toward a comprehensive peace, and that all sides need to take concrete steps toward peace.”

At his press conference, Netanyahu reiterated that good progress had been made at the meeting, but said some issues remained unresolved. The goal, he said, is “to strike a balance” that would meet the settlers’ basic needs while also enabling peace talks to resume.

Responding to Palestinian reports that Abbas had expressed willingness to meet with him at next month’s UN General Assembly session in New York, Netanyahu said that if Abbas “is behind this declaration, that would be progress. This is a positive thing, a positive first step.”

Until now, Abbas has refused to meet with him unless he first imposes a total freeze on settlement construction.

Netanyahu said he is willing to discuss all the well-known final-status issues, such as occupied Jerusalem, borders and the refugees, but also intends to raise issues of his own – primarily the demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state and that any agreement explicitly declare the conflict over and bar any further claims. “We also have core issues, and the issue of recognition is core, in my view,” he said. “If we insist on the recognition, there will be a peace agreement.”

Meanwhile, Knesset Member Tzipi Hotovely (Likud) held a conference in the Knesset Wednesday for the heads of Judea and Samaria settlers, in order to create a united front against Netanyahu’s plan to freeze construction in settlements.

Officials said the freeze may create problems for the Israeli prime minister with rightists in the coalition. However a refusal to halt construction may harm relations with the Labor Party.

The gathering was attended by 20 leaders of settlements in the occupied West Bank. They agreed that over the next month more pressure should be placed on Netanyahu to renege on the decision to freeze.

Noam Arnon, of the leaders of the Israeli settlement in al-Khalil, said the settlers must limit Netanyahu as his government could not legitimately halt construction. “We can’t have a government that behaves worse than that of Olmert,” one speaker said. “We won’t allow a construction freeze; we won’t allow him to break left.”

Some said the Israeli prime minister was deviating from the policy that had won him his position. “People need to be faithful to what they promised during the elections,” the speaker said.

The anti-Netanyahu sentiment demonstrates a departure from the settlers’ policy of attacking Defense Minister Ehud Barak for their grievances. “Barak is no longer the only address. We need to put pressure on the prime minister,” the Yesha Council stated.