Imperialist has moment of truth in Afghanistan

Imperialist has moment of truth in Afghanistan

By John Catalinotto

June 2, 2010

An imperialist politician was forced to resign May 31, not for a scandal, not even for getting caught lying to the public. This time German President Horst Köhler, a Christian Democrat (CDU), was forced to resign for giving everyone a moment of truth about Germany’s role in the war in Afghanistan.

Speaking on Deutschlandradio on May 22 while visiting troops in Afghanistan, Köhler let it slip out: “But my estimation is that, on the whole, we are on the way to understanding, even broadly in society, that a country of our size, with this orientation toward foreign trade and therefore also dependence on foreign trade, has to be aware that when in doubt in case of an emergency, military deployment is also necessary to protect our interests.” (The Local, May 27)

Köhler must have forgotten he wasn’t speaking just to his CDU cronies. His lapse into truth stirred up a storm among the Social Democrats (SPD) and Greens back in Germany. They had been justifying German intervention in Afghanistan as necessary to defend Germany from “Islamic terrorism” as well as for the rights of Afghan girls and women to go to school.

Since the German participation in the attack on Yugoslavia in 1999, these parties have led Germany into wars carried out for alleged human rights. Köhler’s remarks exposed their hypocrisy. So their leaders exploded in a spasm of criticism of the German president for speaking the truth in public.

Opposition SPD Speaker in Parliament Thomas Oppermann told newsmagazine Der Spiegel that Köhler was “damaging the acceptance of the Bundeswehr’s foreign missions.” Oppermann accused Köhler of “making the case of the Left party,” the one party in Parliament that has consistently opposed the Afghan mission. The Bundeswehr is the German armed forces.

Köhler’s remarks exposed the real reason Germany is shipping its young people to the mountains of Central Asia, 3,000 miles away. To fight for such a reason violates Germany’s constitution. His words also opened a window on the whole mechanism of 21st century imperialism.

The big industrialized countries in Western Europe, North America and Japan, which are also the world’s financial centers, exploit workers at home and all over the world. They superexploit workers and seize resources in oppressed countries — mostly former colonies of 19th and 20th century imperialism.

Economically, the rules for this trade and investment are set by the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the World Trade Organization and other institutions controlled by the same big powers.

Militarily, the Pentagon provides the main police force to keep the oppressed from rising up and taking back what has been and is being stolen from them, and to seize more land and open up more areas to invest.

While U.S. imperialists aim to always maintain global military supremacy they demand that West Europe and Japan pay part of the price in money and troops. Otherwise Germany, France, Britain, Japan, etc., lose their place at the table where Washington sits at the head.

The last few administrations’ “Defense Strategy” papers openly declared the goal of U.S. supremacy. The latest one just released on May 27 by the Democratic administration repeated that goal. In keeping with U.S. hypocrisy, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claimed that “U.S. values” were important. Replace “values” with “profits” and it rings truer.

“Stopping the Taliban,” “stopping terror,” and “women’s rights” are all public relations smoke to hide the real reason that Germany, some other European powers and the U.S. government send their young people to kill and die in Afghanistan. The real reasons are to gain markets for investment to exploit more workers, control resources, expand trade, enforce submission in the region and keep the profits rolling in to the banks.

Articles copyright 1995-2010 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

:: Article nr. 66587 sent on 03-jun-2010 01:49 ECT


Israeli Commandoes Carry Death List On “Marmara”

[This is proof that the attack in international waters was a premeditated act of war against Turkey, most likely sick Zionist retaliation for siding with Iran.  No nation will be allowed to interfere with plans for “GreaterIsrael.”    SEE: Were Israeli Commandoes Hunting Turks?]

Murder Inc: Israeli Advance Targeted Assassinations Death List Found on Flotilla

Kawther Salam

Picture of the assassination list lost in the
fray by an Israeli soldier

Flotilla Massacre is a Reply to the warm Turkish-Iranian Relations

The leaders of the Israeli gang of War Criminals, the so-called “Israeli government” is currently engaged in inciting and planning to launch a nuclear war against Iran, was not able to do anything in response to the Turkish- Iranian-Brazilian agreement of May 17 2010 to transfer 1.200 Kg of low-enriched uranium to Turkey in return for nuclear fuel. In retaliation, they perpetrated the massacre on the Freedom Flotilla of humanitarian aid-carrying ships aiming to break the Israel genocide of siege on Gaza imposed since 2006. The Turkish-Iranian-Brazilian agreement stood as an obstacle against the Israeli ambitions to force the world to enter into a spiral of bloody nuclear war. It is wrong to believe that the Turkish government was not expecting the massacre against the Freedom Flotilla which carried 10,000 tonnes of humanitarian aid to Gaza.

The military maritime piracy and massacre operation carried out by Shayetet 13, a naval commando unit, in which at least 20 peace activists were murdered and over 50 were wounded, was a decision of the inner circles of power in Israel and approved by the Israeli Cabinet headed by Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak and other war criminals. This Israeli massacre was a message addressed to Turkey and its new Iranian and Syrian allies. Anyone who knows to read between the lines and the history of Israel’s military leaders can understand that Israel has never distinguished between civilians and militants of the groups which are considered as enemies according to the non-logical standards of the Zionists.

© Unknown
Deck of an Israeli gun boat.

Israel committed a massacre against the Turkish ship “Marmara”, which carried humanitarian aid to the Palestinians besieged in the Gaza concentration camp. This massacre was well prepared by the Israeli cabinet, and some pro-Israel governments were informed with full details about the planned crime. Israel commissioned a special unit in the Marine Corps, deployed boats and helicopters patrolling the coast of Ashdod and Gaza and announced the waters off the coast of Gaza a closed military zone. They also announced via their propaganda organs their intent to transfer the ships and the solidarity activists to the port of Ashdod before deporting them to their countries as illegal immigrants, and to arrest those who refused to identify themselves and sign a pledge not to return. They also prepared tents as detention units to jail the activists and investigate them; the team of the interrogators which Israel choose to interrogate the peace activist was manned by people with experience as torturers and who had previously “worked” the Palestinian prisoners of the Israeli gulag.

Israeli special forces helicopter.

The Israeli ships monitored the Freedom Flotilla from a distance of about 124 km away of the coast of Israel. According to the international movement, the passengers rushed to wear the safe jackets and raised the alert status as soon as the war ships were visible. The peace activists on board of the convoy stated that three Israeli ships spoke to the Turkish ship captain over radio and warned him of the consequences of approaching the coast of Gaza which was declared a closed military area. They demanded to bring the humanitarian aid to the port of Ashdod, stressing that the Israeli navy would prevent the penetration of this “closed military area” at any price, meaning that they would not shrink from murdering anybody.

© Unknown
Israeli gun boat, paid in full by German tax payers.

The ships were carrying 10,000 tons of medical supplies and building materials, timber, and 100 pre-built houses, for ten of thousands of people who lost their homes due to the Israeli war crimes on Gaza early in the year of 2009. They also carried 500 electric vehicles for the use of disabled people, especially for the more than 600 who were left permanently disabled with amputated legs in the recent Israeli war crimes.

© Unknown
One of the civilian victims who was shot during the massacre on the Freedom Flotilla ship.

The Israeli Arab Knesset MP Hanan Al-Zoubi had spoken through a loudspeaker in Hebrew with the Israeli military telling them to not attack ships carrying civilian peace activists and humanitarian aid. She added that during her appeal the Israeli soldiers fired live bullets at ships, which led to the wounding of civilians, among them the Arab-Israeli citizen Sheikh Raed Salah, who was shot and is now in a critical conditions. She added: “the Israeli gunboats approached the “Caravan of freedom” and asked the captain of the ship to identify himself and the identity of the boat. The ships were in international waters about 100 miles from Gaza. At this moment the Israeli helicopters attacked the ships from the sky.

© Unknown
Hanan Al-Zoubi, Israeli Arab Knesset MP onboard the Mavi Mara

Turkish sources and media revealed a document which shows that a death list had been prepared in advance by the Israelis, showing names and pictures of people on board of the ships to be murdered, who, according to Israel, were “involved in the International humanitarian aid for Gaza”. According to the Turkish sources, hundreds of Israeli soldiers stormed the blue Turkish ship “Marmara” flotilla and they had copies of the death list. The list included the names of civilians on the fleet “who should be killed”. The document was apparently recovered after one of the Israeli soldiers lost it during the piracy act.

© Unknown
The Turkish Aid Ship, Marmara.

Regarding the complicity of other foreign states in this crime, it has emerged that the German parliamentarians who were on-board, Annette Groth, Inge Höger and Norman Paech, had repeatedly asked the German Foreign Ministry for support and protection, but were rebuffed and instead they were warned to get off the flotilla because of unspecified “dangers”. The strange attitude of Cyprus, which neither allowed the ships to enter port, nor allowed a delegation of Parliamentarians to board the ships, can in retrospect only be explained with the prior knowledge and complicity in the crime if the Cypriot regime.

In the end, Israel has carried out a horrific bloody massacre, and the victims were all civilians.The questions remain: Did Israel achieve its goals with the massacre on the Freedom Flotilla ship? Did Turkey and the other countries on Israel’s secret hate list (who are listed in secret as “hostile enemies”) receive the Israeli message? What was the Israeli message? The answer to the first question is clear now, and the coming days will reveal the answer to the second question and whether Israel really considers Turkey an enemy in secret. Whatever the answers to these questions, Israel should admit that the political equation has changed in the region and Israel and its allies can no longer change the politics.

In the best interest of everybody, Israel should understand that everything they do is against them and that it would be better to desist from further criminal actions. Also in the best interest of everybody, all other nations must understand that Israel no longer has any legitimacy whatsoever as a state, and that its continued existence as a state is undesirable in the extreme to everybody outside of the tiny corrupt elites which are its support base overseas.

Video footage of one of the discovered lists:

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about ““Marmara” Death List“, posted with vodpod

Tajikistan Asks Russia To Expedite the Shipment of Anti-Hail Rockets–(Weather Modification)

Tajikistan asks Russia to expedite the shipment of missiles “Alazan-6”

CA-NEWS (TJ) – Tajikistan is asking Russia to expedite the shipment antihail missiles Alazan-6 “from the Federal State Unitary Enterprise im.Chapaeva in Cheboksary.

According to CA-News in state institutions for Hydrometeorology Tajik Prime Minister Akil Akilov Republic sent a letter to the Russian government, in which the Tajik side requests to expedite shipment of missiles Alazan-6.

“Currently, the country urgently needed Anti-hail missiles, to a certain extent mitigate the threat of new flooding of human settlements and farmland from hail and torrential rains” – said the source.

According to him, this year in Tajikistan, turned out to be extremely difficult due to weather conditions. There are continued heavy rains, accompanied with hail, triggering mudflows and floods as a result of which, according to latest figures, killed around 50 people, three dozen people still missing, more than 300 people were injured, thousands of families homeless. Caused enormous damage to the economy, which according to official figures, more than 600 million U.S. dollars.

Emotion high as Turkey buries its Gaza flotilla dead

Emotion high as Turkey buries its Gaza flotilla dead

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Funerals take place in Istanbul for Gaza ship activists

Emotions are running high in Turkey at funerals for nine activists, all Turkish or of Turkish orgin, killed in Israel’s raid on the Gaza aid flotilla.

The bodies were flown from Israel to Istanbul, along with more than 450 activists, to a heroes’ welcome.

Israel has said there is no need for an international inquiry into the incident, insisting its own will meet the “highest international standards”.

The UN Human Rights Council (HRC) voted earlier to set up an investigation.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said his troops had no choice but to stop the ships and argued that the flotilla had been aiming not to deliver humanitarian aid to Gazans, but to break Israel’s blockade.

It was Israel’s duty to prevent rockets and other weapons being smuggled into Gaza to Hamas by Iran and others, he said.

Turkey, one of Israel’s few allies in the Muslim world, recalled its ambassador after the incident on Monday.

‘Barbarism and oppression’

Its President, Abdullah Gul, said relations between the two countries would “never be the same”.

“This incident has left an irreparable and deep scar” on relations, he told reporters in Ankara.

In a fiery speech at Istanbul airport, Deputy Prime Minister Bulent Arinc accused Israel of “piracy” and “barbarism and oppression”.

Crowds of people, some wearing Palestinian-style scarves, gathered in the city to meet the coffins, swathed in Turkish flags, at the Ottoman-era Fatih mosque.

The funerals were taking place in a strongly Islamist part of the city and emotions were running high, reported the BBC’s Bethany Bell.

One of the bodies was due to be buried in Istanbul while the other eight would be taken to their home towns, AFP news agency reported.

Turkish post-mortem examinations found all nine of the dead had been shot, some at close range.

A coffin is carried through the crowd to the Fatih mosque in Istanbul, 3 JuneThe funerals are taking place at a historic Istanbul mosque

The dead include a 19-year-old Turkish citizen with an American passport – hit by four bullets in the head and one in the chest – and a national taekwando athlete, Turkish media say.

The bodies arrived, along with the 450 activists, in three aircraft chartered by the Turkish government at Istanbul airport in the early hours of Thursday, after several hours of delays.

Mr Arinc said his government saluted the Turkish Islamic charity, the Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (IHH), which played a leading role in organising the convoy – a charity Israel has accused of supporting terrorism.

IHH leader Bulent Yildrim, said upon his arrival back in Istanbul that he believed the death toll could be higher than nine, as his organisation has a longer list of missing people.

British activist Sarah Colbourne told the BBC: “I couldn’t even count the amount of ships that were in the water. It was literally bristling with ships, helicopters and gunfire. It was horrific, absolutely horrific.”

‘Double standard’

Consular staff were on hand in Istanbul to help the activists from other countries. They include 34 people who hold British passports.

The MV Rachel Corrie (undated photo)The MV Rachel Corrie is expected in the blockade area within days

Doctors in Ankara, where some of the severely injured were taken, say they have been treating people for bullet wounds. Three people are in intensive care.

Seven other activists are in a serious condition and will remain in Israeli hospitals until they can be moved, Israeli officials say.

Another plane carrying 31 Greek activists, three French nationals and one American flew into Athens early on Thursday.

More than 100 relatives and supporters cheered and shouted pro-Palestinian slogans at the airport.

Rejecting the proposed HRC investigation, Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev said demands for an external inquiry showed a double standard towards the Jewish state.

When American or British troops were accused of killing civilians in Iraq or Afghanistan, he said, it was the US or Britain that carried out the investigation, not an international body.

The US, Israel’s most important ally, has already made it clear it will accept an Israeli-led inquiry, the BBC’s Andrew North reports from Jerusalem.

Talk in Gaza is now turning to the next ship on its way across the Mediterranean to try to break the blockade, the BBC’s Jon Donnison reports from the territory.

The Rachel Corrie – carrying about 11 people, including Nobel Peace Laureate Mairead Corrigan Maguire – had been due to be part of the original flotilla but was delayed because of technical problems.

The ship could be in the region by Saturday, our correspondent reports. Israel has said it will not be allowed to dock in Gaza.

Meanwhile, some of the 10,000 tonnes of aid seized from the flotilla by Israel has been returned to the Israeli port of Ashdod after being left stranded at a Gaza-Israel crossing.

The Hamas government in control of Gaza refused to accept the aid until the Israeli-Arab activists still in detention were released.


The flotilla of six ships, including the Turkish ferry Mavi Marmara, was on its way from Cyprus to Gaza carrying supplies including cement, paper and water purification tablets.

Narco Atlantic Treaty Organization

Narco Atlantic Treaty Organization (I)

Konstantin PENZEV (Russia)

Not long ago, I was talking with a very smart friend who knows a lot about Russian history. As usual, the conversation turned to politics. It turned out that my friend has some pretty liberal opinions, but some of the ideas he expressed told me that he watches television anyway.

“No matter what anybody says, the Soviet Union started falling apart after the war in Afghanistan,” he said.
“Maybe,” I said, “but what does that have to do with our young men who served there? Do you really believe in all that talk about international duty?”

“Just a minute,” he said, raising his hand to stop me from interrupting. “What does international duty have to do with it? The Americans wanted to put military bases, missiles and aircraft in Afghanistan, and there is such a thing as estimated flight time and all that…”

“So? Did they do it?”

“What do you mean?”

“What I mean is, after Gorbachev pulled the troops out the place didn’t stay empty for long. If memory serves, there are 70,000 American soldiers in Afghanistan now, and soon there’ll be 100,000 —just as many as we had. Right? Right. But why did they go there, out of some sense of international duty? Maybe Obama wants to establish democracy and open a line of fast food restaurants. All I want to know is, what have they put in Afghanistan? What kind of missiles and long-range bombers, and when will the United States begin bombing us?”

My friend looked thoughtful, and then he decided to let me talk.

“Okay, what are the Americans doing in Afghanistan then?

“No, try to answer the question, and just ask yourself —what does that country have to offer besides its geographic location? Oil, gas, uranium, rivers of milk and honey? What’s there?”

There came a short pause while my friend thought about what kind of raw materials Afghanistan has. Finally, somewhat uncertainly, he answered:


To tell the truth, I have no idea why the Soviet Union sent troops to Afghanistan. I never sat in the Politburo and talked about life with Yuri Andropov. I don’t know if Brezhnev’s Politburo wanted to earn a little money from the heroin trade, or if, on the contrary, they wanted to eliminate a source of infection near Soviet borders. In my scatterbrained socialist youth, drug addicts in the Primorsky Krai (where I grew up) only flipped over drugs that were grown and made locally. There was no heroin in Primorye. Now there is; it’s imported and sold at a very reasonable price.

I doubt that the Soviet troops in Afghanistan were a preliminary step in Russia’s expansion towards India. That’s what the British Empire feared more than anything in the 19th century. Russia’s aspirations towards Central Asia gave London nightmares about Russian battalions taking Delhi and Bombay by storm. Then more recently, the world’s leading military powers started abandoning the practice of classical colonialism. It often cost more to maintain expeditionary forces than to simply bribe a few native ruling tribes.

Why did the United States jump through hoops in the 1980s to drive the Soviet Union from that impoverished country using a savage and illiterate people? Could the Soviet Union have carried out extensive mining during its ten years that covered the costs of maintaining 100,000 soldiers armed with heavy weapons and turned a hefty profit? Could the United States, which now has its forces in Afghanistan, have started producing oil and building powerful electric power stations? Why is Obama willing now to negotiate even with the sinister anti-Semite Ahmadinejad and all the devils of Central Asia, both individually and collectively, to acquire unimpeded access to the country?

I’ll concede that Afghanistan has extensive reserves of certain kinds of resources. Consider, for example, the copper ore deposits in the Aynak Valley. I should mention that it is currently the largest undeveloped copper deposit in the world. It was first discovered by Soviet geologists in 1974, and during the 1980s the USSR carried out preparatory work there. But it folded when Soviet forces left. So it can be argued that the USSR actually had economic interests in Afghanistan, and those interests were tied to its mineral resources.
After the Soviet troops were withdrawn, Aynak was forgotten as though it had never existed; then in 1998 we learned from representatives of the Taliban that the Siemens Corporation had become interested in it. However, the company’s interest came to nothing, and Aynak was again forgotten until the Taliban lost control in 2001. The story of how they lost control of the country is a different subject, but I’ll try to describe it briefly.

As you, dear reader, are probably aware, in 2001 two skyscrapers were blown up in New York City. Who blew them up is unknown. US President George Bush claimed that former CIA agent Osama Bin Laden did it. Some investigators agree in principle that Mr. Osama committed that heinous act, but they are unsure whether he is in fact a former agent of the CIA. In short, several members of the media argue that the terrorist act of September 11, 2001 was the result of collusion among some people associated with the ruling faction in the United States.

On October 7, 2001, the Armed Forces of the Empire of Good began a military operation against Mr. Osama under the code name Operation Enduring Freedom in which B-1, B-2 and B-52 bombers, naval forces, and the Marines took part. Since CIA agent Osama bin Laden (he started working with the CIA while he was a mujahedeen) was living in Afghanistan, the operation against him was naturally conducted in that country. The Taliban government was overthrown and the country was occupied. They failed to find Mr. Osama, of course; and now he is either still living in Afghanistan, or he’s in Pakistan, or he has died from typhus. However, I wouldn’t be surprised if in 20 years we find out that after Obama became President he shaved off his beard and moved to Oklahoma.

Back to the Aynak copper deposit. I should mention that after the occupation regime in Afghanistan was established, local authorities turned their attention to the country’s mineral resources. In 2003, experts of the British Geological Service and the US Geological Survey conducted a geophysical survey of the Aynak deposit with Pentagon support and confirmed the conclusions of Soviet geologists about the rich copper ore deposits there. And what happened?

In August 2006, Afghanistan’s Ministry of Mines invited international investors to bid on development of the Aynak field. The bidders included the Australian consortium Bahar, the Indian Corporation Hindalco Industries, Canada’s Hunter Dickinson, the Kazakh company Kazakhmys (which is registered in Great Britain), two Chinese companies- —Zijin Mining and China Metallurgical Group Corporation (MCC) — and America’s Phelps Dodge, as well as two Russian organizations: Tyazhpromexport and Soyuzmetallresurs.

MCC won the competition.

It’s funny that now we frequently hear US concerns about China gaining power. That gives rise to a reasonable question. Why didn’t at least the Australian corporation win the competition? Probably because the US government couldn’t care less about some ridiculous copper ore deposit. Why not? Could it be that such undertakings don’t pay enough to make the US establishment want to get involved?

The classical reason for war in our time is oil. Is there any in Afghanistan? Yes. Less than is needed to justify a small victorious war, but there is some. However, long-range global strategic plans may be involved.

John Foster, a columnist for Canada’s The Chronicle Herald, wrote a piece on August 26, 2009 called “Why is Afghanistan So Important?” One glance at a map and a little knowledge of the realities of the region tell us all we need to know: the military intervention by Western countries in fact has deep roots. Afghanistan neighbors on Middle Eastern countries that have large reserves of oil and natural gas. Although there is little oil in Afghanistan itself, two of the countries bordering it have the world’s second and third largest reserves of natural gas —Iran and Turkmenistan.

It simply turns out that Uncle Sam has a strategic plan to link the oil and gas deposits of South and Central Asia by a pipeline so that “energy can flow to the south.” Perhaps that is why Washington first threatened Iran, and then after Obama took office he began to put out feelers in Tehran with the idea of gaining unimpeded access to Afghanistan. It is also possible that implementation of this strategic plan is the reason for the Manas Airbase in Kyrgyzstan; it has provided exactly that access (it has now been redesignated a Transit Shipment Center).

As we know, it doesn’t cost much to make plans. As for the current reality, that’s the way things are. The Taliban’s main source of funding was trade in raw opium and the heroin derived from it. In 1999, 4565 tonnes of raw opium were produced in Afghanistan; the total world production that year was 5778 tonnes. Thus, Afghanistan is the largest producer of heroin and has a virtual monopoly over production of the raw material for its manufacture. Not to mention that this country is currently the largest producer of hashish after Morocco.

The military operations in 2001 caused a drop in raw opium production, but since then it has continually increased. According to the International Committee for Drug Control, raw opium production in Afghanistan during 2002 amounted to 2700 tonnes; in 2003 it was 3400 tonnes; in 2004 —4200 tonnes; in 2007 —8200 tonnes; and in 2008 —7700 tonnes. It’s difficult to say how much is actually produced, as opposed to what the ICDC statistics say.

We know that the amount of opium poppy under cultivation in Afghanistan during 2007 had increased by more than 2.5 times compared with 2002 and is estimated at 19.3 thousand km². In Afghanistan raw opium costs about $100 per kilogram. Thus, the 7700-tonne harvest is worth $770 million on its primary market, and that is just a drop in the bucket. After it has been processed and resold, its value increases many hundreds of times, breaking all imaginable records for return on investment. The profitability of this “business” is comparable only to that of printing money (it costs eleven cents to print a $100 bill). For example, a gram of heroin costs $100 on the Ukrainian black market (2009).

Those are the facts.

To be continued.

Konstantin Penzev is a writer, a historian and a columnist for New Eastern Outlook.

SourceNew Eastern Outlook

Daniel Estulin’s Historic Speech On Bilderberg Group in the European Parliament

Source: Pajamas Surf (special thanks for the translation and publication)

The researcher Daniel Estulin delivered a speech to the politicians in Brussels, revealing the intention of the financial elite to collapse the global economy and make the world a corporation, of which only they benefit. Spanish translation of the speech and video of the press conference at the headquarters of the European Parliament and the subsequent questions.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

El histórico discurso de Daniel Estulin denunciando al Grupo Bilderberg en el Parlamento Europeo ParlamentoEuropeoDanielEstulin1junio20101 300x199

We are now in a position to change history. Finally I believe that humanity has a future. A population at a demoralized and without purpose is emerging from a long sleep. In this general awakening, people are starting to ask appropriate questions. No longer, “what I gain from this?” But “what is right?”. It is an international phenomenon of response and reaction to an outstanding perception that the world is destined for disaster at least we, people, do something about it.

I have written a book about the Bilderberg group. The book, in some ways, has become the catalyst for a movement around the world. Now, you do not have much time, so I would like to explain what is Bilderberg and why it must be stopped.

In the international financial world, there are those who lead and those events that react to events. While the latter are better known, more numerous and more powerful in appearance, the real power lies in the former. In the center of the global financial system is the financial oligarchy represented by the Bilderberg group.

El histórico discurso de Daniel Estulin denunciando al Grupo Bilderberg en el Parlamento Europeo P1100870 300x225

Bilderberg organization is dynamic, meaning that changes over time, absorb and create new parts while disposing of the parties in decline. Its members come and go, but the system itself has not changed. It is a system that is self-replicating, a virtual web intertwined with financial, political, economic and industrial.

However, Bilderberg is a secret society. It is an all-seeing evil eye. There is no conspiracy but many people with their childhood fantasies see it that way. No group of people, and I do not care how powerful they are, they sit around a table in the dark, holding hands, having a crystal ball, planning the future of the world.

It is a gathering of people who represent a certain ideology.

It is not a global government or NWO, as many people mistakenly believe. However, ideology is that of a global company LTD. In 1968, during a Bilderberg meeting in Canada, George Ball, Undersecretary of Economic Affairs of JFK and Johnson said: “Where do you find a legitimate basis for the power of corporate management to take decisions that may profoundly affect the economic life of nations whose governments have only a limited liability. “

The idea behind each of the Bilderberg meetings is to create what they called the aristocracy of purpose on how best to manage the planet between the elites of Europe and North America. In other words, the creation of a huge network of cartels, more powerful than any nation on Earth, destined to control the vital needs of the rest of humanity, obviously from his vantage point, for our own good and benefit. We, the lower classes (“The Great Unwashed“as they relate to us.)

However, the reason why people do not believe in the Bilderberg and other organizations working together and exercising such control on the world stage is that theirs is a Cartesian fantasy, in which isolated the intentions of some individuals, and not dynamic social processes shape the course of history as the movement of the evolution of ideas and some items over several generations and even centuries.

Bilderberg group is the medium of financial institutions that represent the most powerful and predatory financial interests. And right now, this combination is the worst enemy of humanity.

El histórico discurso de Daniel Estulin denunciando al Grupo Bilderberg en el Parlamento Europeo P1100877 225x300

We can not congratulate you today, Bilderberg has become the subject of the corporate media.Not because the corporate media have suddenly remembered their responsibility to us, but because we have forced this awkward position to be aware that the presidents and prime ministers and kings and queens are tiny puppets of powerful forces operating behind the scenes .

Something has happened in the midst of general economic collapse. People are largely subject to something that does not always understand. But that leads them to act a certain way, in their own interest. That’s what they are doing in Greece. That’s what they are doing in the U.S.. It’s called the anthropic principle. It’s like a tidal wave came and took our fears. The people, realizing that their existence is threatened, have lost their fear, and others perceive Bilderberg.

Maybe that’s why in a recent speech at the Council on Foreign Relations in Montreal, Zbigniew Brzezinski, one of the founders of the Trilateral Commission, adivirtió that “global political awakening” in combination with internal struggles within the elite, threatened to divert the movement towards global governance.

You can see that people at this table come from different political and ideological past. What unites us, however, is that we are all patriots. And those who oppose us, those who work for secret societies, who have sold their nation for a piece of meat, are traitors. Not only traitors to their people and their nations, but of humanity as a whole.

Now, the subject of this press conference is Bilderberg: Towards a Global Company LT.

It’s been about six and a half centuries, Europe’s economy had collapsed in what is known as the “New Dark Ages” of Europe, the largest European economic and demographic decline since the fall of the Roman Empire. Then in the middle of the 14th century, much of the power of the oligarchy abruptly disintegrated. This decay chain erupted as the sudden collapse of the financial bubble of speculation worst debt in history (so far), when houses Brady and Peruzzi bank collapsed. The disintegration and collapse of the Lombard debt bubble triggered a collapse in power within families oligarchs.

What should you do with Bilderberg?

The modern history replaced the medieval history at the time in which the institutions singularly distinguish the modern history of medieval history were put in place. That happened in 1439 in the Council of Florence. What were these new institutions?

1) The conception of the modern nation-state republics under the rule of natural law

2) The central role of promoting scientific and technological progress as the mandate given to the republic.

These two ideals represent a crucial point: its existence as an institution in every part of Europe, changed everything in Europe because these institutional changes the pace of development increased per-capita and per square kilometer of mankind over nature. So no nation will not progress reached and not developed by the fear of being left hopelessly behind.

The first event occurred under the France of Louis XI, which doubled the per-capita income of France and defeated all the enemies of their nation. Louis XI’s success generated a chain reaction of efforts to establish a nation-state model with the England of Henry VII.

Another key idea that came from the Council of Florence, who later was implemented in the United States, is the universal principle of general welfare, in which the entire modern society is based.

Now, welfare does not mean anything good for sitting on a couch eating pizza, drooling, watching TV, waiting to get the unemployment check.

It is a question of immortality. What is the intention of the existence of man and the government? Is to provide for the welfare of future generations of man. To ensure our survival as a species. The very beginning of the General Welfare, as expressed in the compendium in the preamble of the Federal Constitution is the fundamental law.

So how does this relate to today? These people want an empire. That is what is globalization.And too many people believe that to have an empire, you need money. They have heard the phrase: the Elite Money. But money is not a determinant of wealth and the economy. The money does not lap over the world. Money has no intrinsic value.

The human mind affects the development of the planet. This is how humanity is measured.Verdadeo This is the meaning of immortality. What separates us from animals is our ability to discover universal physical very beginning. It allows us to innovate, which subsequently improves people’s lives by increasing the power of man over nature.

You see, they are destroying the world economy on purpose. Nor is it the first time. This was done in the 14th century in the New Dark Ages: finished with 30% of the population.

Empire: stupid people down. They want to destroy the creative powers of reason.

Growth 0, 0 progress. Club of Rome (Limits to Growth, 1973)

1980 Draft Council on Foreign Relations, promote controlled disintegration of the global economy.

Bilderberg 1995: Demand destruction. How? By destroying the world economy on purpose.

The Great Depression, “Transfer of Wealth. The Great Depression was not an event that wiped out U.S. capitalists. It was an event that made even richer by transferring wealth from people at the hands of those who were already rich. This is how the Bank of America made billions through foreclosures from 1929 to 1937. Do not think for one second that the richest of the rich will be hurt by the collapse is coming. The only ones hurt will be us.

El histórico discurso de Daniel Estulin denunciando al Grupo Bilderberg en el Parlamento Europeo P1100890 300x225

Look at Greece. What they’re trying to do is collapse the sisema, instead of allowing Greece reorganized its monetary system, are imposing that Greece is used, the Greek debt is financed by Europe. But that debt is worthless. It’s garbage money monopoly. So ask him to Europe, which in turn is going through its own financial meltdown, which absorbs an unpayable debt, which the Greeks, indeed, may never pay, that will surely destroy signifcant Europe. And this is being done on purpose, because nobody, not even Barroso, who, with all respect to him, is absolutely intellectually impaired or Trichet is so stupid.

Let’s get rid of the bureaucracy in Brussels. Despidámoslos everyone. All are beggars. They are useless. These people have never done anything useful in their lives. Let’s get rid of Barroso. He flunked history in school. Let’s get rid of Van Rumpey hypocrite, not because it is useless but because it is mailgno and very dangerous. It is not the first time a malignant little guy wins his way through the darkness toward the depths of power.

Look, it’s a leadership issue and a question of immortality. All leaders of society, especially in times of crisis, are leaders because they are measured against this standard approach. People like Barroso, Van Rumpey, the European Union President Jean Claude Juncket, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, managing director of the International Monetary Fund, can hardly be considered leaders. In fact humans can hardly be considered under the perspective of human representation for the greater good of humanity.

Now, what I’m hablabndo is not a scientific issue but a moral problem. A question of immortality.“We as a nation state, as people on the planet believe in the future of mankind? And what kind of future we will have 100 or 200 years. Or what will become of us in 10,000 years? Do we have the right to dream? If we can have a sense of purpose for being here, then the bad guys can win.

For example, we were told that the euro must be saved. That the failure of the euro will bring the downfall of the European Union. That is a lie. Instead of a weak and dysfunctional European monetary union be returned to independent nation-state republics. The Europe of our ancestors.

“Cultural diversity is not only the hallmark of progress but an insurance policy against human extinction.” Once born, the concept of state nation never dies, just wait for the brave and sane human beings in their defense, and refine the concept. So we have to be a fraternity of nations, sovereign nations, united by the common purpose of humanity. Until we can bring humanity to an Age of Reason, the story will actually be formed not by the will of the bulk of humanity but for the few that, good or bad intentions, leading the destiny of man as a herd of cows is driven back and forth through the fields and occasionally also to the slaughter.

* Translated from English by Surf Pyjamas