Will Syria Exist After The War?

Will Syria Exist After The War?

Author: Fadel

What will happen to Syria after this conflict?

Never has the Middle East seen such a divide between its nations since the inception of the Iran-Iraq War. On one side is the Gulf States: Qatar, Saudia Arabia, and the only non-Gulf State, Turkey. On the other side: Syria and Iran. You would think this was the Cold War with the United States on one side and Russia (formerly the U.S.S.R) on the other. Throw out your textbooks, the Cold War isn’t over. But, is this about the proliferation of arms? Or is this a more complex conflict that has led to the rise of religious extremism coalesced with the dilapidation of Arab nationalism?

When Ben Ali, Ghaddafi, and Mubarak were deposed by Salafis amalgamated with people legitimately opposed to the government for political and economic reasons; it became Assad’s turn to face the people. The issue with the attempt to abdicate Assad was, for the most part, sectarian in nature. Dr. Bashar al-Assad is one of the most educated leaders in the world. His English is spoken with remarkable fluidity and accuracy; he speaks English at a higher level of proficiency than most Americans. So, why was this man facing removal? He wasn’t corrupt like Mubarak; his wife’s family did not use her husbands political influence for their monetary gain like Ben Ali’s wife; and he did not obstruct education and create a personality cult like the late Ghaddafi. He was a simple man. The reforms were there. Syria’s economic climate was no different than the other countries in the world. He did not abuse minorities like Ghaddafi. The Druze in Syria were at peace with the government. Lebanon survived its 2005 Cedar Revolution without the increase of bloodshed within its borders. Now, the Assad regime was facing a threat that most were not prepared for – a proxy war between Israel and Iran.

“What! What does Israel have to do with this? Oh, I get it – you are throwing out the conspiracy card.” No, I am not. I am giving you the truth. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey are in for a surprise; they have been used for their wealth and influence. Do you really believe the United States supports Al Qaeda and religious zealots hell-bent on bringing religious hegemony to the world? Not a chance. It’s a regional war, so you have to use your resources to attain what you endeavor. The U.S. has strong ties with the three aforementioned countries. Israel, well, Israel does not. The Flotilla crisis still angers Turkey. Saudi Arabia is furious that Israel will not recognize Hamas in Gaza. Of course, there is Qatar, who offers nothing besides a wealth of oil and money. So, why are they blind to Israel’s hidden agenda? Well, because it’s aligned with their own political agenda. Remember, “the enemy of my enemy is my friend;” this is true.

Weapons are pouring into Syria, foreign Muslims are calling for Jihad against the ‘kafirs’ in Syria, and Syrians are fighting their own people. Nothing good has come from this in the Arab world. They are systematically destroying themselves for the greater good of Israel. What is the greater good of Israel? The isolation of Iran and the obstruction and destruction of Hezbollah. In 2006, Israel was embarrassed by the stalemate between their armed forces and Hezbollah. In fact, it was a victory for Hezbollah. Hezbollah received what they wanted in the end and Israel was forced to concentrate troops in the southern part of the land they plundered. They were on the side of Iran during the Iran-Iraq War and now they are sworn enemies. Do you think if they could predict the rise of Hezbollah in Lebanon that they would rethink their support of Iran during the war? I believe they would have. Iran becoming stronger only weakens Israel. Iran as a nuclear power creates fear and desperation on the side of Israel. They believe Iran and Hezbollah to be the biggest threat to the sovereignty of the reinvented Kingdom of David.

So, what happens when the FSA finally quits and foreign Jihadists are called to end their jihad. Qatar, Saudia Arabia, and Turkey will have failed to usurp Assad and have caused insurmountable destruction to Syria that all of their billions of dollars combined could not fix. The people who have perished in this conflict cannot be brought back. Their families will forever associate a stigma with those three nations. As the Syrian government rebuilds over the ashes of a once beautiful nation, the people will remember the deeds of those who used money and political influence to bring about their own political hegemony. Some will call for immediate reprisals against those three nations and I am sure there will be. Perhaps Assad grants clemency to the PKK after he arms them. Maybe he arms Saudi’s against their own government. I cannot tell you for sure.

Can Assad put everything aside for a harmonious Arab League? The answer is absolutely not. Syria needs to drop out of the Arab League and cut all ties with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey (until Erdoghan is out of office), and Jordan. He needs to strengthen his alliances with Iraq and Algeria. He needs to become the champion of anti-Jihad around the world. Countries like Mali could use a friend like him. He already has Iran as his strongest ally, all he needs to do is isolate Qatar and Saudi Arabia; but, he needs to do it without violence. The Saudi government is not as stable as it appears. They oppress minorities, deny women rights, and they are notorious human rights violators (You know they sat on the United Nations Human Rights Council – what a joke). As for Qatar, they are insignificant – truthfully. Do not listen to any English or American Middle Eastern analysts; they are under the influence of Qatar’s money, especially many academics and professors. My own aunt, whose name I will remain anonymous, takes her students to Qatar and finds them work. She also vehemently opposes Assad. She lives very comfortably, which is obvious with her income from all of her broadcasts on Al-Jazeera. Moving on, they will still use Al-Jazeera and the media to influence people. My hope is that people wake up and boycott their media.

Finally, good ole Israel. Well, former president Clinton had more relations with Monica Lewinsky than Syria has had with Israel. Syria will continue to support Hezbollah and Iran. Netanyahu and the rest of the Likud will become more aggressive with their words towards Iran. They will deny any involvement in the Syrian conflict; which is a lie. How are rebels coming into the Golan from Israel? You are telling me a country who has more checkpoints than a Nascar race does not have a checkpoint to block insurgents from coming into Syria? How about their aerial attack in southern Syria? Was that an accident or a clear violation of the U.N’s laws of warfare? You be the judge. Why did the news just report that Israel has confirmed 50,000 troops from Lebanon and Iran coming to Syria? They want to legitimize the Opposition using rebels from abroad by stating that Syria is using soldiers from abroad. Israel will never live at peace and they shall meet a heavily armed, well-trained Iranian Army one day in the near future. Unfortunately for them, their endeavor to remove the Assad regime so Iran cannot have a way to attack Israel directly will fail.

-Leith

Advertisements

Commander of Southern Command Reports Pentagon PsyOp for the Complete Militarization of Latin America On Schedule

[Gen. Kelly warns about possible Iranian terrorism merging with drug cartels in Central and South America.  At the nexus of terrorism and drug traficking you will always find the CIA.]

CIA Torture Jet crashed with 4 Tons of COCAINE, September 24, 2007  

A Gulfstream II jet that crash landed in Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula in late September bearing a load of nearly four tons of cocaine. This particular Gulfstream II (tail number N987SA), was used between 2003 and 2005 by the CIA for at least three trips between the U.S. east coast and Guantanamo Bay — home to the infamous “terrorist” prison camp — according to a number of press reports.

Kelly Warns of Potential Crime-Terrorism Nexus in Latin America

United States Department of Defense

By Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, March 20, 2013 – A potential connection between crime syndicates and terrorists in Latin America would constitute a clear danger to the region, U.S. Southern Command’s senior leader told reporters at the Pentagon today.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
Marine Corps Gen. John F. Kelly, commander of U.S. Southern Command, holds a news conference with reporters at the Pentagon, March 20, 2013. DOD photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Chad J. McNeeley
  

(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

Marine Corps Gen. John F. Kelly said the increase in Iranian influence in Latin America is worrisome, and an example of the peril that the combination of criminal networks and states that sponsor terrorism, like Iran, could pose.

Kelly, who took over U.S. Southern Command in November, told reporters at a Pentagon news conference that in the past six years Iran has tried to increase its influence in Central and South America. The Iranian government, he said, has built embassies and cultural centers in the region.

“The concern is that … they’re looking … for influence — say for votes in the U.N. on sanctions,” he said. “But also, and I’ve … made mention to some of our friends in the region that these guys are very, very good at what they do, and very, very skilled at what they do, and that people should just be careful as to who they’re dealing with.”

The general stressed he is not accusing Iran of sponsoring terrorism in Latin America, but he noted that Iran is involved in terrorism in other areas of the world.

“We do know that some terrorist organizations are able to skim off fairly substantial sums of money from the drug profits,” Kelly said. “And so there has to be kind of a network for that to happen.”

The criminal networks in Latin America are very sophisticated and very well financed, he said.

Drugs are the basis for this wealth and the drug-related money coming out of the United States “is astronomical,” Kelly said.

taliban bed of dollars2

“I mean palettes of money,” he said. “For a buck, anything can get on the [drug transport] network.”

That network, Kelly said, transports tons of drugs into the United States and Europe and moves bales of money back out.

“The point of it all is the network is a very dangerous thing to have working as effectively as it does, because anything can get on it,” he said.

Kelly said his command is working to build military-to-military contacts throughout Latin America and the Caribbean.

“The good news about Latin America and my part of the world is that there are no wars,” he said.

And most Latin American countries, including Brazil — the world’s fifth-largest economy — want the United States as a partner, Kelly said.

The countries of the region don’t ask for much, the general said.

“When I go down and visit, they’re not asking for an awful [lot] — they’re not asking for money,” Kelly said. “They’re willing to pay their own way.”

What the Latin American countries need is expertise, the general said. For example, Peru is asking for help in getting its separate military services to work together better. Colombia needs help in countering improvised explosive devices that the terror group FARC and criminal syndicates use to protect coca fields and factories. Other nations need medical expertise.

Turning to another topic, Kelly noted that sequestration will hit his command hard. He said there will be fewer vessels to interdict cocaine shipments, and fewer troops to operate with partner militaries.

The Bloodsucking Barbaric Saudis Given Special “Fast Pass” Around Customs Intended for Civilized Nations

Saudi Arabia, the nation which produced 15 of the 19 hijackers in the 9/11 attacks, is about to become one of a handful of countries whose travelers can bypass normal passport controls at major U.S. airports. Sources tell the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT) that this will mark the first time that the Saudi government will have a direct role in vetting who is eligible for getting fast-tracked for entry into the United States.

An agreement to accept Saudi Arabian applicants into the Global Entry trusted traveler program drew little notice when it was announced in January. Now, some officials question why the country merits such a benefit – which is similar to a theme park “fast pass” to avoid long lines – when other allies like Germany and France are not yet included. A program for Israeli travelers was reached last May but has not been implemented.

Travelers approved for the program can skip the normal Customs and Border Protection (CBP) lines starting next year and enter the country after providing their passports and fingerprints at a kiosk. Only Canada, Mexico, South Korea and the Netherlands currently enjoy the benefit, although pilot programs could expand it to a handful of others.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced the agreement in January after meeting with Saudi Interior Minister Prince Mohammed bin Nayef. It “marks another major step forward in our partnership,” Napolitano said at the time. “By enhancing collaboration with the Government of Saudi Arabia, we reaffirm our commitment to more effectively secure our two countries against evolving threats while facilitating legitimate trade and travel.”

Details about how the plan will work with the Saudis have not been released. Nayef’s ministry, however, will be responsible for screening which applicants will be considered when the pilot program begins next year. It’s not known whether the Saudi ministry will share its raw intelligence about applicants with its American counterparts. What is known, based on information provided by a Homeland Security source, is that each individual who makes it into the program will have been vetted by both the CPB and by the Saudi Interior Ministry against various databases.

The Department of Homeland Security declined to make anyone available to answer questions about Saudi Arabia’s inclusion in the Global Entry program after repeated requests throughout last week, and after indicating someone would provide more details.

That is cause for concern, given lingering questions about possible Saudi support for some of the 9/11 hijackers and given the Ministry of Interior (MOI)’s inconsistent record on sharing its intelligence on suspected terrorists and terror financiers. Additionally, recent studies by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) identified significant problems in the way DHS components use computer systems and process intelligence for posting watch list lookouts and overseas screening of foreign nationals.

Once accepted into Global Entry, travelers can enjoy the faster border entry for five years.

A memo obtained by the Investigative Project on Terrorism said Saudi applicants “must meet the individual vetting criteria of both CBP and the MOI, and successfully complete vetting by each side against information available in various law enforcement, customs, immigration, criminal, intelligence, and terrorist databases.”

That doesn’t bring confidence to those who have investigated Saudi Arabian connections to the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., whose district lost more than 70 people during the attack on the Pentagon, called the pact a bad idea. He also stated that he had not previously heard about the deal.

“I think you have radical Wahhabism in certain elements in Saudi Arabia, and I think to be more lenient there than in other places would be a mistake,” Wolf said. “There were 15 [hijackers] from that country, and there is a lot taking place in that region.

“Some of the people who went back to Saudi Arabia through Guantanamo – we find that they are in battlefields in Afghanistan or some other place, so I don’t think it’s a good idea.”

Saudis have long been known for withholding information from their American counterparts. Wolf recalls that the Saudis obstructed former FBI Director Louis Freeh’s effort to investigate the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing by refusing to share information.

“I think there has been a history of not cooperating,” Wolf said.

The Saudis paved the way for 9/11 by funding the madrassas along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, which adds to Wolf’s concern.

Unseen Information, Unanswered Questions

“Adding KSA to the program before a full vetting of the Kingdom’s involvement in 9/11 is very unwise,” said Sharon Premoli, a 9/11 survivor who has sued the Saudis for allegedly helping finance the attacks.

“We don’t know if what they tell us is correct. Why should we trust them?” she said in an interview Thursday. She points to a 1998 agreement Saudi Arabia struck with bin Laden and the Taliban prior to 9/11. A 2011 Vanity Fair article described it this way:

In sworn statements after 9/11, former Taliban intelligence chief Mohammed Khaksar said that in 1998 Prince Turki, chief of Saudi Arabia’s General Intelligence Department (G.I.D.), sealed a deal under which bin Laden agreed not to attack Saudi targets. In return, Saudi Arabia would provide funds and material assistance to the Taliban, not demand bin Laden’s extradition, and not bring pressure to close down al-Qaeda training camps. Saudi businesses, meanwhile, would ensure that money also flowed directly to bin Laden.

“They didn’t tell us that,” Premoli said in the interview. “They haven’t been forthcoming on anything.”

Saudi officials deny that deal existed. The only way to find out is to continue investigating, Premoli said. She’s perplexed that the brutal murder of 3,000 Americans even requires an effort to trigger additional investigation.

“Let’s vet them properly. Let’s really declassify. Let’s look at all of it. Until it is done, it’s an open wound. It’s an unanswered question.”

The Global Entry deal comes three years after U.S. officials briefly placed Saudi Arabia on a list of 14 countries whose travelers would face enhanced scrutiny when entering the United States. It followed Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab‘s failed attempt to bomb a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day 2009.

A cable sent from the American embassy to the State Department that was published by Wikileaks reported that Saudi government officials expressed “shock to be included on the list” and threatened to “to re-evaluate areas of cooperation, including counter-terrorism cooperation” if it was not rescinded.

The policy was dropped three months later, replaced with a new program designed to use threat assessments and intelligence of traveler’s behavioral traits and travel patterns.

To Premoli, who is pushing legislation to strip sovereign immunity protection from governments tied to terrorist acts, both the removal of Saudi Arabia from that list and its addition to Global Entry show the country enjoys “favored nation status. It’s so extraordinary that they are so protected.”

She was critical of the Bush administration for its warm relations with the Saudi royal family and is equally critical of the Obama administration for being “a continuation of the Bush administration.” When the plaintiffs suing Saudi Arabia sought to appeal a decision absolving the Saudis to the Supreme Court, then-Solicitor General Elena Kagan filed an amicus brief siding with the Saudis.

Saudi Arabian officials say all the investigations into the 9/11 attacks exonerated them of any involvement. But two former U.S. senators who led inquiries into the attacks say that’s just not so.

In affidavits submitted last year for plaintiffs suing the Saudis – including Premoli – former Nebraska Sen. Bob Kerrey and former Florida Sen. Bob Graham wrote that the book on Saudi Arabia’s 9/11 connections should not be closed.

The 9/11 Commission on which he served lacked the time and resources “to pursue all potentially relevant evidence” involving Saudi Arabia, Kerrey wrote.

“Significant questions remain unanswered concerning the possible involvement of Saudi government institutions and actors in the financing and sponsorship of al Qaeda, and evidence relating to the plausible involvement of possible Saudi government agents in the September 11th Attacks has never been fully pursued,” Kerrey wrote.

Graham, who was chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee at the time of the attacks, was co-chairman of a joint congressional inquiry. He has spent years arguing that a 28-page chapter from that inquiry would cast things in a different light if it ever is declassified.

“Based on my experiences as the Co-Chair of the Joint Inquiry, and the evidence collected by the Joint Inquiry during the course of its investigation into the events of September 11, 2001, the information contained in the Final Report of the 9/11 Commission, and reports and published material I have reviewed, I am convinced that there was a direct line between at least some of the terrorists who carried out the September 11th attacks and the government of Saudi Arabia,” Graham wrote in his affidavit.

Hijackers and Their Helpers

That line may have come in the form of Omar al Bayoumi, a Saudi who befriended hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Midhar. While the 9/11 Commission Report describes Bayoumi as “an unlikely candidate for clandestine involvement with Islamist extremists,” Graham believes he was a Saudi government agent.

Al-Bayoumi first met the hijackers in 2000, helped them find an apartment and “fronted the initial payments for that apartment” along with other financial help, Graham noted.

“During the period that he assisted the hijackers, al-Bayoumi’s allowances from a ghost job with a Saudi private firm and contractor with ties to the Saudi government increased eightfold. During that same period, Al-Bayoumi had an unusual number of telephone conversations with Saudi government officials in both Los Angeles and Washington.”

All this convinces him al-Bayoumi was a Saudi agent. “To this date, this evidence has not been fully explored and pursued, to the considerable detriment of the American public.”

In a column co-written with Premoli last fall, Graham said the classified chapter from the congressional inquiry focuses on the hijacker’s financial support while they were in the United States. “Sadly,” Graham and Premoli wrote, “those 28 pages represent only a fraction of the evidence of Saudi complicity that our government continues to shield from the public, under a flawed classification program which appears to be part of a systematic effort to protect Saudi Arabia from any real accountability for its actions.”

Abdulaziz al-Hijji, an executive with the Saudi government oil company Aramco, lived in Sarasota until just before the 9/11 attacks when he is reported to have suddenly left the U.S. Al-Hijji now lives in London. Recent media reports indicate al-Hijji met with 9/11 terror leader Mohamed Atta and current al-Qaida fugitive Adnan el-Shukrijumah while he lived in Sarasota. Graham has also looked into the al-Hijji matter and reportedly met with the FBI deputy director in November of 2011 and the deputy director refused to discuss the al-Hijji matter. Graham said, “I think that in the period immediately after 9/11 the FBI was under instructions from the Bush White House not to discuss anything that could be embarrassing to the Saudis.”

Saudi Arabia sends thousands of travelers into the United States each month, and more than 92 percent of Saudis who seek entry visas receive them, Asharq al-Awsat reported. In 2012, 20,677 student visas were granted to Saudi citizens.

The United States and Saudi Arabia do about $60 billion in business each year, most of which is Saudi oil exports.

The ambiguity of Saudi Ministry of Interior’s role is of particular concern, especially when it comes to who qualifies as a “low-risk traveler.” Although individuals with defined al-Qaida ties likely would not get a pass, worries arise particularly when it comes to those who support Hamas or Hizballah.

“I wouldn’t trust them as far as I could throw them,” Jim Phillips, senior research fellow for Middle Eastern affairs at the Heritage Foundation, said regarding the Saudi Interior Ministry.

Although the Saudi Interior Ministry has largely decimated al-Qaida’s infrastructure in the kingdom since 2003 in the wake of a series of bombings and killings of Westerners in the kingdom, Phillips says the ministry’s reliability as a partner remains an open question.

In an interview Tuesday, Graham reserved judgment on the program until more details are released on its implementation. He noted that the United States “went out of its way to placate the Saudis” after 9/11, arranging flights out of the country for Saudi nationals when all other air traffic was grounded, and waging “an effort to keep from public view the role of Saudis” in the 9/11 attacks.

Including Saudi travelers in Global Entry may be “a continuation” of an American policy of deference toward Saudi Arabia. “The question is what was the first step in approving a country to be involved in this? What are the requirements?” Graham asked. “This is not a theoretical. This really happened that 15 Saudis came into the country, I think all by aviation … It would seem there would be some red flags.”

Wolf suggested that the House Homeland Security Committee should examine the terms of the agreement to learn how it happened and it will work.

“It’s a slap in the face,” Premoli said. “Whatever they ask for, they get. There’s nothing they can’t have.”