Obama, Americans Really Do Understand That You Have Hired A Terrorist Army To Wage the Terror War


Obama on Syria: Americans Just Don’t Understand


“What I’m saying is, that if you haven’t been in the Situation Room… Unless you’ve been involved in those conversations, then it’s kind of hard for you to understand the complexity of the situation and how we have to not rush into one more war in the Middle East.”

President Obama in an interview with the Public Broadcasting Service.

President Obama and other Democrats keep talking about avoiding “another Iraq” and avoiding a “rush to war” similar to the 18-month run up to the invasion of Saddam Hussein’s dictatorship.

And while Obama seems to be following much of the U.S. playbook for Iraq between 1992 and 2001 – secretly training, encouraging and equipping rebels, but not enough for them to succeed – there’s no reason to think that anything on the scale of the 2003 invasion is remotely close to happening in Syria.

Instead, the Iraq invasion straw man is key to Obama’s approach to the genocidal civil war between Muslim sects in the impoverished nation of 20 million at the crossroads of the Middle East.

Much as he is defending his domestic surveillance programs by asserting that he is not like former Vice President Dick Cheney, he is defending his arming and training of Islamist rebels in Syria by saying he is not like George W. Bush.

But Obama needn’t reach back a decade for an example of how U.S. military interventions work in the region.

Obama and other NATO leaders in Northern Ireland for an economic summit met today with Libyan Prime Minister Ali Zeidan.

Zeidan is the man who helped convince Obama and his European counterparts to depose Libyan dictator Muammar Gadaffi and install a new government ultimately led by Zeidan, a liberal reformer Libyan exile, who worked as a human rights lawyer in Switzerland.

The promise, articulated a few times by Obama, was that Islamism would be a transitory state for the new nation. Zeidan and his fellow exiles promised that, in order to take out Gaddafi, who had brutally oppressed Islamists.  A moderate theocracy, they argued, was the only way to unite the opposition and usher in a new era. In time, Libyans would cease to bitterly cling to their rocket launchers and religion–and become enlightened.

But it hasn’t worked out so swimmingly.

Libya has remained a hotbed of Islamist extremism, most notably for Americans with the raid on the U.S. outpost in Benghazi that claimed the lives of four Americans, including the first American ambassador killed on the job in a generation.

The topic of discussion with Zeidan today was likely focused on the fact that the radicals don’t seem to be moderating. The only thing keeping the Western-backed government in power are Islamist militias who, in some cases literally, defend it against popular unrest.

But to keep the Islamists and their Kalashnikovs on board with the new government, the reformers have had to give away the store. When angry mobs are outside the door, the demands of one’s protectors tend to sound quite reasonable. The hard-line Islamists, though, are losing patience and may soon enough decide to oust the Western-backed crew entirely.

Zeidan was likely asking his Western benefactors for some cash and protection. Obama and the Europeans were likely asking that Zeidan do something about the al Qaeda affiliated goon squads roaming the streets.

And so it has been in other places where America and Europe less directly encouraged Islamist overthrow of secular strongmen. Egypt may make it to Western liberalism as Obama promises, but for now it is the world’s most populous theocracy.

The net effect is that Iran is having a great run, as the Great Satan and the Little Satans in Europe help spread Islamism in a way that would have been beyond imagining a decade ago. Obama promises that these are the good Islamists, but sometimes it’s rather hard to tell.

Obama, though, says he can tell. He told Charlie Rose that if Americans, strongly opposed to U.S. intervention in Syria, could see what he saw in the Situation Room at the White House they would be cool with the idea of arming the rebels, but not too well.

The rebel crew in Syria seems to be the roughest lot of any to emerge in the Islamist awakening across the region. But Obama’s implicit promise is that we can help the ones who don’t eat the internal organs of their enemies or shoot children in the face for telling a joke about Mohammed.

In the interview, Obama also pooh-poohed the notion that acting more forcefully or swiftly might have prevented the massive genocide or prevented the really, really bad Islamists from gaining a foothold. It’s complicated, he said. And it requires all of the secret knowledge he has to understand.

The president argues that those people who want air strikes, etc. are trying to remake the Iraq invasion. And for those who don’t want to go in at all, he says he can make sure to help the good guys and not the bad ones.

Obama’s nibbling interventionism – famously dubbed “leading from behind” – has produced plenty of unhappy results so far. But if you knew what he knew, Obama promises, you would be on board.

That seems to be the new motif of this presidency, whether it’s domestic spying, taking it easy on the IRS and Department of Justice scandals or implementing his creaking and groaning health law. Americans can’t understand the details here, but Obama and his team of experts understand things in a way we can’t.

Obama can’t tell you why he’s doing what he’s doing because it is too complicated. But if you could understand, you’d be all for it.

For a government and a president suffering a crisis of confidence, “trust me” takes a mocking tone.

And Now a Word from Charles

“Look, the search for Iranian moderates is perpetual.  And the answer is always the same — it’s a mirage.  We go back to the hostage crisis in ’79.  We were looking for the moderates.  Then Iran-Contra started because the national security advisor of Ronald Reagan of all people had had the idea that he knew of some moderates in Iran and he went over on a secret trip.  In the end he was swindled and humiliated.  But this happens over and over again.  This is a wish.  It’s not a reality.”  

Charles Krauthammer on “Special Report with Bret Baier”

Chris Stirewalt is digital politics editor for Fox News, and his POWER PLAY column appears Monday-Friday on FoxNews.com. Catch Chris Live online daily at 11:30amET  at  http:live.foxnews.com.


the enemies of Islam are attempting to destroy it from within—200 Years of New Kharijism

200 Years of New Kharijism: the Ongoing Revision of Islam

By Shaykh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani

Chairman, Islamic Supreme Council of America
We live in a time when the enemies of Islam are attempting to destroy it from within.
Resourceful and determined, they announce new mode of leadership that pretends to restore
the purity of the faith as a guise to gain the confidence of Muslims and non-Muslims alike. The
unwary observer is readily misled by their portrayal, which is eagerly disseminated by the
media. In fact, it is these proponents of extremism who are themselves outside the realm of true
Islam. “The Religion of God,” al-Khatib said, “lies between extremism and the laxity.”i

1.0 Prophetic Traditions

The advent of these extremists was foretold by the Prophet of Islam, Muhammad (s).
Prophet Muhammad’s authentic traditionsii detail for us the characteristics and behavior of the
extremists, stating that their existence in our world would be revealed when “…the destitute
(al-buhm) camel-herds compete in building tall structures,”iii or in another narration “…the
barefoot, naked, indigent (al-‘âla) shepherds compete in building tall structures.”iv “…The
barefoot and the naked are the heads of the people,”v or “…the barefoot and naked, the deaf
and dumb are the kings of the earth.”vi

“Barefoot and naked” and “deaf and dumb” are metaphors to describe in figurative
speech just how depraved the new leaders would be. “Barefoot and naked” relates to people of
the desert, and implies their utter ignorance in matters pertaining to organized society.vii “Deaf
and dumb” implies that they would fail to use common sense in anything concerning religion,
though they are perfectly sound in mind and limb.viii Implied as well is the notion that the
extremists’ ultimate goal is world domination, to be “kings of the earth.”

The traditions reveal another of the signs of the extremists’ onset is “the affectation of
eloquence by the rabble and their betaking to palaces in big cities.”ix Prophet Muhammad
predicted a reversal in society whereby these depraved leaders would take over the rule of
every region by force. They would become extremely rich and their primary concern would be
to erect the tallest buildings, rather than maintain order or care for the common welfare.x

2.0 A Reversal of Values

Sadly, we have witnessed the realization of the Prophet’s prediction in the dominance of
extremist ideology in the Middle East and its increasing influence in the West. Because of their
influence and their reversal of values, we now see doctrinal, political, and physical wars of
exclusion being waged everywhere in the name of Islam. In the United States, extremist
ideologues have waged a fifty-year long campaign to exclude moderate, traditional Muslims
from political arenas as well as the mosque. The effect has been to create the impression that the
200 Years of New Kharijism – The Ongoing Revision of Islam Islamic Supreme 2 Council of America
extremists are the majority whereas they are simply the most vociferous, having made it more
comfortable for the majority of Muslims to stay at home, away from their doctrinal wrangling.

These two phenomena, depraved leadership and exclusionism, are the mainstays of
New Kharijism in our time. What clearer proof of this than what took place in Makka on
November 20, 1979, when hundreds of armed men seized the Holy Mosque under the 36-year
old Juhayman al-‘Utaybi and proclaimed him as the new leader of the country? They held the
mosque for two weeks during which they practiced lewd sexual behavior with the women they
held captive and those they had brought with them.

According to the New York Times, “There were hundreds of casualties on both sides
before Saudi forces were able to drag out the last remnant of what by then was a bunch of filthy,
bedraggled young men.” Al-‘Utaybi and sixty-three of the captured were later executed by
public beheading. According to As Sayyid Yusuf al-Rifa‘i, these wild young people learned
their ways from the same teacher as Abdel Aziz Ibn Baz (d. 2000), a famous Wahhabi scholar.

3.0 The Original Khawârij

Before we speak of the modern phenomenon of New Kharijism it is important to define
the principal constituents of Khariji doctrines. The name “Khawârij” was applied to those who,
in the time of the Successors of the Companions to the Prophet (one generation after Prophet
Muhammad’s lifetime), parted ways with other Muslims and declared them disbelievers, just as
the followers of Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab, or “Wahhabis” (also known as the “Salafis”), do today.xi

The Khawârij or “Kharijites” were tens of thousands of Muslims mostly comprised of
Qur’an memorizors and devoted worshippers who prayed and fasted above the norm. Yet, they
declared every one of the Companions and all who associated with them to be apostate
disbelievers and took up arms against them. The practices of declaring Muslims apostate
(takfîr/tashrîk) and taking armed action (baghî) against the central Muslim authority – the
Caliphate – became and continues to remain the hallmark of the Khawârij.

In addition, the Khawârij altered the interpretation of the Qur’an and Sunna, and used
them to declare it lawful to kill and take the property of Muslims, as do their modern
counterparts, the Wahhabis.xii

The classification of the Wahhabis as Kharijis has been a leitmotiv of Sunni heresiography
for the past 200 years. Only now has it become politically incorrect among the scholars of Islam

4.0 Three Principles of the New Kharijis

The chief brand of New Kharijism, or Wahhabism, distinguishes itself from traditional

Islam by three main principles:

1. Anthropomorphism of the Deity: Attributing a body to the object of Islamic worship.
2. Disrespect of P rophet: Harming the Prophet through:
200 Years of New Kharijism – The Ongoing Revision of Islam Islamic Supreme 3 Council of America
! Disrespect of his noble person, mosque, grave, vestiges, Family, or Companions.
! Disrespect of those who visit, love, and praise him.
! Disparaging or holding his status as an intercessor in disdain.
3. Disregard for the schools and methods of the Sunni Imams including:
! The Imams of Sunni doctrine (‘aqîda): al-Ash‘ari and al-Maturidi.
! The scholars of traditional Sunni jurisprudence (fiqh): Abu Hanifa, Malik, ash-Shafi‘i,
and Ahmad.
! The Imams of Sunni morals (akhlâq) known as the Polesxiii of the science of soulpurification
(tasawwuf): al-Junayd, al-Gilani, al-Shadhili, al-Rifa‘i, al-Chishti, al-
Suhrawardi, Shah Naqshband, and al-Tijani.xiv

Since all sincere Muslims believe God is transcendent and love their Prophet, it follows
that this third principle, disregard for the Sunni Schools and their jurisprudential authority, is
by far the most harmful tenet of New Kharijism and its most devastating achievement. The
attack on the schools of thought has resulted in the pollution of pure belief, the arrogant
rejection of Islamic authority, and the discrediting of pious Muslims striving to follow the
straight path.

The traditional schools were immediately supplanted by extremist ideologues and
radical centers of education. Africans tell the story of a young man sent to study Shari‘a at great
expense by his Sunni parents. Upon his return a few years later, he refused to eat a chicken
slaughtered in his honor by his father stating, “my father is an apostate.” Scenarios like this one
quickly caused a great rift between the generations of peace-loving Muslims and the chaosdriven
youth who were their children.

More ugly still is the violence wreaked by extremists on the Muslims of Syria, Egypt,
Algeria, Afghanistan, Daghestan, Chechnya, and within the Indian Subcontinent. Violence and
societal upheaval were instilled at the new schools by radical ideologues like Egyptian ex-
Communist Sayyid Qutb. Sayyid Qutb declared a Muslim is either a “revolutionist” or an
infidel,xv and went so far as to declare all the Islamic societies of his time apostate and fit to be
overthrown. He stated, “Islam is a force that runs to gift freedom to all people on the earth with
no regard to the variety of their religious beliefs. When this force meets with aberrant forces, it
is the duty of his so-called “Islam” to struggle and annihilate them.”xvi Invoking the memory of
the original Kharijis, he also wrote, “Islam is a whole: its separated parts should be united and
the differences removed.”xvii

5.0 Prohibitions of the New Kharijis

Today Sayyid Qutb’s spiritual children – such as the followers of Taqi al-Din al-
Nabahani, who are outlawed in most Muslim countries – tell Muslims not to:

! Participate in government.
! Sit on jury duty.

200 Years of New Kharijism – The Ongoing Revision of Islam Islamic Supreme 4 Council of America
! Vote.
! Collaborate with other faith groups.
! Recite the remembrance of God in collective gatherings of dhikr.xviii
! Commemorate the birthday of our Prophet (mawlid) nor read poetry in his honor.
! Wear turbans or attempt to revive Prophetic traditions concerning dress.
! Show deference or respect to religious scholars or pious elders.
! Visit the tombs of saints.

5.0 The Ongoing Revision of Islam

The Neo-Kharijis and their sponsors are mounting a worldwide offensive to convince
Muslims and the rest of the world that theirs is the only way. To this end, a vast publishing
campaign to revise Islam has been under way since the early thirties, an effort that has been
redoubled since the eighties. This campaign is waged on five fronts:

5.1 Tampering with the Texts

A wanton, unethical manipulation of the great books of Islam has removed words or
entire chapters from classical works by the great Imams such as al-Nawawi, al-Sawi, and Ibn
‘Abidin. Quranic exegeses such as Tafsir al-Jalalayn and the works of ‘Abd Allah Yusuf ‘Ali have
all been reprinted with changes. This corrupt tampering of these guiding texts has been
documented at length.xix

5.2 “Improving” on the Foundational Books of Islam

They have unabashedly published corrective comments on manuals whose contents
were long ago established as normative in the scholarly community of Islam. Many such
instances have also been documented. xx

5.3 Revising Their Own Source Texts

Not content to fiddle with historically accepted books, they also find fault with the
minor texts they publish and distribute in order to gainsay their own putative authorities. This
is a patent illustration of the principle that each new generation of innovators rejects the
previous one as too moderate.xxi

5.4 Reprinting Discredited Works

The Neo-Kharijis are supplementing their own works by re-circulating books that have
already been condemned by the majority of scholars. Though heretical and un-Islamic,
numerous books are now being promoted as the fundamental guides for the practice of Islam.xxii
200 Years of New Kharijism – The Ongoing Revision of Islam Islamic Supreme 5 Council of America

5.5 P romoting the Works of Unqualified, Self-styled Scholars to Attack Sufis and Asharis


! Muhammad Ahmad ‘Abd al-Salam,
! Muhammad al-Shuqayri,
! Ibn Abi al-‘Izz,
! Muhammad Nasiruddeen al-Albani,
! Abdul Aziz Bin Abdullah Bin Baz,
! Muhammad bin Saleh Al-‘Uthaymin,
! Dr. Abu Ameenah Bilal Phillips,
! Dr. Muhammad Taqi-ud-Din al-Hilali,
! Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan,                                                                                                                                                   ! And many others. xxiii

Their dismissal of the traditional schools of thought, their development of schools as
incubators for radical ideology, their attack on the source texts of Islam and generations of
recognized scholars, and their financing by ideological counterparts worldwide, have truly
enabled the Neo-Kharajite movement to dominate the vision of Islam in the world. Finding
roots in the Khawârij of ca. 750 CE, and given new life by Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Wahhab in
the 19th century, these extremists have only really succeeded in their efforts to subvert Islam in
the past 75 years.

Traditional Muslims, the silent majority, remain numerous and confidant enough to
repel the Neo-Kharajite movement from within Islam, given the necessary support. However,
backed by the oil-wealth of their ideological counterparts overseas, Neo-Kharajites have a
definitive advantage over the majority of Muslims, who have only their own humble resources
at their disposal. Only with real financial and political support can classical Muslim scholars
and moderate, mainstream Muslims reclaim the banner of Islam from these usurpers, retake the
podium they have hijacked, repel these extremists and discredit their heretical ideology. Truly,
this is a battle worth fighting. And it is a battle which, with the help of Almighty God, we can
and must win.

Truly we belong to Allah and to Him is our return, and there is no power nor might except in Allah the
Exalted and Almighty Lord.

200 Years of New Kharijism – The Ongoing Revision of Islam Islamic Supreme 6 Council of America


i In al-Dhahabi, Siyar A‘lam al-Nubala’ (1997 ed. 13:598).
ii Prophet Muhammad’s sayings and advice communicated through verifiable chains of transmission, known as
the ahadith. The body of traditions are called the Sunna, and form the second basis for Islamic law, in addition to the
Holy Qur’an.
iii The well-known hadith of Gibril in Sahih al-Bukhari.
iv Sahih Muslim.
v Ibid.
vi Ibid
vii see Al-Taymi, Sulayman.
viii Ibn Hajar, Fath al-Bari.
ix Related by Al-Tabarani, through Abu Hamza, on the authority of Ibn ‘Abbas.
x Al-Qurtubi.
xi Ibn ‘Abidin, Radd al-Muhtar ‘ala al-Durr al-Mukhtar (3:309), “Bab al-Bughat” [Chapter on Rebels].
xii Al-Sawi, Hashiya ‘ala Tafsir al-Jalalayn (v. 58:18-19) in the Cairo, 1939 al-Mashhad al-Husayni edition (3:307-8)
repr. Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi in Beirut.
xiii Aqtâb, sing. qutb
xiv The schools of tasawwuf are known as Paths, turuq, sing. Tarîqa.
xv Qutb, Sayyid, World’s Peace and Islam.
xvi The Future is Islaam (p. 203).
xvii Social Justice in Islam (p. 35).
xviii Dhikr is considered by traditional Muslims as the most excellent form of devotion for a servant of God, and is
stressed over a hundred times in the Holy Qur’an. For the spiritually-inclined, it is polish for the heart, the essence of
the science of faith, and the key to all success. Nor are there any restrictions on the form, frequency, or timing of
dhikr whatsoever.
xix Cf. Appendix, “Albani and Company,” in Struggle for the Soul of Islam: Exposing the Scholars of Najd and
the Wahhabi/Salafi Movement, paragraph on Ibn Baz.
xx For example: Ibn Abi al-‘Izz’s commentary on al-Tahawi’s ‘Aqida. Al-Tahawi’s `Aqida is a normative classic of
Islam but Ibn Abi al-‘Izz is unknown and unacceptable as a source for Ahl al-Sunna teachings. Examples of his
unreliability are his rejection of al-Tahawi’s articles:
! §35: “The Seeing of Allah by the People of the Garden is true, without their vision being all-encompassing
and without the manner of their vision being known” and
! §38: “He is beyond having limits placed on Him, or being restricted, or having parts or limbs, nor is He
contained by the six directions as all created things are”.
Al-`Izz states, “Can any vision be rationally conceived without face-to-face encounter? And in it there is a proof
for His elevation (‘uluw) over His creatures,” and “Whoever claims that Allah is seen without direction, let him verify
his reason!” [Ibn Abi al-‘Izz, Sharh al-‘Aqida al-Tahawiyya, p. 195]. He also endorses Ibn Taymiyya’s view of the finality
of Hellfire, in flat contradiction of the al-Tahawi’s statement, §83. “The Garden and the Fire are created and shall
never be extinguished nor come to an end.” [Ibid. p. 427-430] There is also doubt as to Ibn Abi al-‘Izz’s identity and
authorship of this Sharh.
xxi Muhammad Hamid al-Fiqqi objects apoplectically to Ibn Taymiyya in his edition of the latter’s Iqtida’ al-Sirat
al-Mustaqim in the section entitled “Innovated festivities of time and place.” He criticizes Ibn Taymiyya for saying
that “some people innovate a celebration out of love for the Prophet and to exalt him, and Allah may reward them
for this love and striving.” Al-Fiqqi writes a two-page footnote exclaiming, “How can they possibly obtain a reward
for this?! What striving is in this?!”
200 Years of New Kharijism – The Ongoing Revision of Islam Islamic Supreme 7 Council of America
xxii Including:
! Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab’s Tawhid, which is replete with doctrinal errors such as:
o Calling the Ash‘aris “Nullifiers of the Divine Attributes” (mu‘attila) [chapters 2, 16]
o Declaring the Lesser shirk an integral part of the Greater. [7]
o Misinterpreting the hadith “do not make my grave an idol” to mean: do not even pray near it
whereas the agreed-upon meaning is: Do not pray towards or on top of it. [20]
o Stating: “The disbelievers who know their disbelief are better-guided than the believers.” (inna
al-kuffâr al-ladhîna ya‘rifûna kufrahum ahdâ sabîlan min al-mu’minîn) [23]
o Stating: “Among the polytheists are those who love Allah with a tremendous love” [31].
o Stating that “the two opposites [belief and disbelief] can be found in a single heart” [41] in
violation of the verse [Allah has not assigned unto any man two hearts within his body] (33:4).
This and the previous four concepts are fundamental to understand their propagation of
mutual suspicion among Muslims.
o Stating that Allah is explicitly said to have two hands: the right holds the heaven and the other
holds the earth, and the other is explicitly named the left hand. [67]
! ‘Abd Allah ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal’s al-Sunna, a foundational book of the Wahhabi creed. According to
Shu‘ayb al-Arna’ut, “at least 50 percent of the hadiths are weak or outright forgeries” in this book. Its
publication was sponsored by His Highness King ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ibn Sa‘ud and a Jedda businessman
named Muhammad Nasif in Cairo in 1349/1930 at al-Matba‘a al-Salafiyya.
The same Muhammad Nasif financed:
! an attack on Imam Muhammad Zahid al-Kawthari and the Hanafi School by ‘Abd al-Rahman al-Mu‘allimi
al-Yamani (d. 1386 H) entitled al-Tankil li Ma W arada fi Ta’nib al-Kawthari min al-Abatil.
o the reprinting of al-Qari’s hapless fatwa against the parents of the Prophet.
o the dissemination in India of al-Khatib’s derogatory biography of Imam Abu Hanifa from Tarikh
! Ibn Taymiyya: Fatwa Hamawiyya; ‘Aqida W asitiyya; Hadith al-Nuzul; Awliya’ al-Shaytan; Iqtida’ al-Sirat al-
Mustaqim; Qa‘ida fi al-Tawassul; Ziyarat al-Qubur, etc.
! Ibn al-Qayyim: al-Qasida al-Nuniyya; Ijtima‘ al-Juyush al-Islamiyya.
! al-Harawi’s Dhamm ‘Ilm al-Kalam wa Ahlih
! al-Biqa‘i’s takfîr of Shaykh Muhyi al-Din Ibn ‘Arabi – may Allah have mercy on him – in his book Masra‘ al-
Tasawwuf, Tanbih Al-Ghabi Ila Takfir Ibn ‘Arabi, ed. ‘Abd al-Rahman al-Wakil (Bilbis: Dar al-Taqwa, <1989>)
xxiii In Arabic:
! Muhammad al-Shuqayri who wrote the book al-Sunna wa al-Mubtada‘at
! Muhammad Khalil Harras wrote a commentary on Ibn Taymiyya’s ‘Aqida W asitiyya – distributed for free
in the Arab world
! Al-Albani
! ‘Abd al-Rahman ‘Abd al-Khaliq, al-Albani’s student and deputy in Kuwait, al-Fikr al-Sufi (“Sufi Thought”)
and its abridgment Fada’ih al-Sufiyya (“The Disgraces of the Sufis”).
! ‘Abd al-Rahman Dimashqiyya
! Mahmud ‘Abd al-Ra’uf al-Qasim al-Madkhali, al-Kashf ‘an Haqiqat al-Sufiyya (“Unveiling the Reality of the
Sufis”), 1993. The book was refuted by Dr. ‘Abd al-Qadir ‘Isa in his 700-page Haqa’iq ‘an al-Tasawwuf.
! Al-Tuwayjiri (Hamd ibn ‘Abd al-Muhsin). With all respect to his person, he demanded that women caught
driving in Saudi Arabia be labeled as prostitutes in the courts.
200 Years of New Kharijism – The Ongoing Revision of Islam Islamic Supreme 8 Council of America
! Al-Jaza’iri (Abu Bakr)
! Al-Wadi‘i (Muqbil ibn Hadi), Nashr al-Sahifa fi Dhikr al-Sahih min Aqwal A’immat al-Jarh wa al-Ta‘dil fi Abi
Hanifa. Fada’ih (“Disgraces”), 1999.
In English
! Ibn Baz, Sunnah and Caution against Innovation
! An anonymous tract entitled A Brief Introduction to the Salafi Da‘wah.
! Muhammad Ma‘soomee al-Khajnadee (d. 1961 ce), Blind Following of Madhhabs (Birmingham: al-
Hidaayah Publishing, 1993).
! A. A. Tabari, a fictitious name for the author of The Other Side of Sufism, a tract distributed in Wahhabifunded
mosques and posted on the Internet.
! The Naqshbandi Tariqat Unveiled, al-Hidaayah, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

The “Last Hour”—When The Barefoot Camel-Herders Compete With Each Other To Build the Tallest Building

Sahih al-Bukhari, 1:2:48,  “When the shepherds of black camels start boasting and competing with others in the construction of tall buildings.”

Saudi billionaire prince eyes world cities for mile-high tower

Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal

The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism– Emmanuel Goldstein (reposted)

Emmanuel Goldstein – The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism by Bob Martin