Neoconservatism – Fascist Zionism–(written as Bush threatened war with Iran, 2007)

[For those of you who don’t remember why “Neoconservatism” is a dirty word, or those who refuse to remember previous fights against fighting “wars for Israel.”]

Neoconservatism – Fascist Zionism

By Peter Chamberlin
8-19-2007

We are about to start a conflict extending from Lebanon to Iran, to eliminate Israel’s enemies. Don’t we owe it to those who are about to die at our hands to learn whether Israel planned these wars for us? Is the government correct, that Iran is really fomenting these wars, or are they just being blamed for them, because of successful Israeli false flag operations, which were designed to pull the US into destroying all of Israel’s threatening neighbors? If the answer is the latter, then how far did Israeli covert efforts go in to forcing us into solving their wars? Would that mean that the Israelis were the invisible element in the 9/11 demolition? Or could it be that there was a dedicated hardcore Zionist-American faction, which undertook the dirty treasonous act on Israel’s behalf? Were the neocon plotters, specifically, the “Wolfowitz cabal,” responsible for this “false flag” terror attack?

There is a lot of information floating around on the web about Mossad involvement in covert terrorist elements in these hot spots (many of them blamed on associates of Al Qaida). The Mossad has even been linked to death squads in Iraq and in Kurdestan, in apparent efforts to ignite religious civil strife and interstate conflict within Muslim populations. Is Israel behind the “Al Qaida-linked” terrorists who are igniting the Lebanese conflict, or are these really the efforts of the American/Saudi “Welch group?”

We know that Hamas is a creation of Mossad, creating it to one day foment a Palestinian civil war, in order to eliminate prospects of a diplomatic solution to the conflict. Today we see this same policy playing-out in a reversal strategy, where Israel turns against its creation, Hamas, to support the remnants of its former adversary, the PLO. Did this long-term Israeli strategy to ignite intra-Islamic civil wars extend beyond the occupied Palestinian territories?

Reports circulate of Mossad involvement in the training and arming of anti-Shiite warriors in Iraq and Kurdestan, to launch terrorist attacks in Iran. Most of these reports have extended from Seymour Hersh’s research in his expose’ on American sponsoring of those terrorists in “The Redirection.”

Was Hersh’s expose’ of the operation a part of the operation, intended to warn as well as to agitate the American and Iranian people? If there really is an Israeli plot to psychologically manipulate the American government into untenable situations, meant to force war upon us, then are not the American people also targets of this PSY-ops?

Is the ongoing standoff between America and Iran that is taking place over the issue of Iran’s nuclear program, really because “the two countries accuse each other of creating strife in the Middle East, including Lebanon, Iraq and the Palestinian territories,” or because of Israeli PSY-ops programs to make them believe that this is true? Is it coincidence that America and Iran are at each other’s throats in these countries, even though they share many of the same goals in them? In Iraq, they both support the Maliki government’s efforts to stabilize Iraq, but not if Iraqi security means helping their adversary. Or has Israel maneuvered both America and Iran into this fight over the things they agree upon?

The only evidence on Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program comes from the terrorist organization, Mujahadeen-e-Khalq.  Mossad is deeply involved with MEK, training them in Iraq, to attack targets inside of Iran. According to former weapons inspector Scott Ritter, the “evidence” on Iran’s nuclear program (given by the MEK) actually came from the Mossad, to be passed to the MEK by neocon Michael Ledeen.

Ledeen is a hardcore Zionist with a long history with Israel. He has been implicated in other incidents of falsifying intelligence to ignite wars (Niger yellow cake forged documents and an associate of Ahmed Chalabi). He was a key player in the Iran/contra incident, and was a student of fascism in Italy, where he acquired his beliefs for his book “Universal Fascism” (fascism with the anti-Semitic components removed). Ledeen’s links to Italian fascism extended to his association with the “strategy of tension” and the creative use of terrorism and false flag-type operations (Operation Gladio to use fear to manipulate public opinion, in order to achieve their fascist dominated world.

Ledeen is the one hardcore Zionist/fascist who appears to link the neocon conspiracy to the secret government rogue network associated with the Iran/contra conspirators. Ledeen’s connections with these Italian fascist false flag operations and the Iran/contra secret government group makes him a prime candidate as one of the principle organizers of the 9/11 parallel attack operation. Ledeen, along with Wolfowitz, Feith and Perle, had been named by former Sec. Defense Caspar Weinberger as part of the “X Committee,” which was under investigation for allegedly passing top secret intelligence to Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard. Ledeen’s Zionist/fascist views had been shaped by George Mosse, “a German Jewish emigré, who had been on good terms with such Nazi leaders as Joseph Goebbels and Herman Goering… who would become Ledeen’s teacher at the University of Wisconsin, taught that…Western countries had been suffocated and could only be revived through Fascism or Nazism…” in their noble mission to dominate the world for its own good. Their concept of the strategic “noble lie” became a cornerstone of the Bush neocon political philosophy and the disinformation policies that flowed from it.

Wolfowitz and most of the neocons learned from Leo Strauss, who was a German Jew in the early Hitler era and a “protégé and enthusiastic promoter of the ideas of two leading intellectual figures of the Nazi Party: existentialist philosopher…Martin Heidegger; and Nazi jurist Carl Schmitt, who wrote the legal opinion justifying Adolf Hitler’s February-March 1933 post-Reichstag Fire dictatorial putsch.”

Like Mosse, Strauss was a hardcore believer in a fascist form of Zionism.

Between Ledeen and the Wolfowitz cabal, radical Zionism gave birth to an American form of fascism, which was dedicated completely to the darkest tenets of the global Zionist conspiracy, to dominate the world using every means possible. This group of conspirators were followers of radical Zionist Zeev Jabotinsky and were closely associated with his legacy, the Betar organization. According to Jabotinsky,

“Betar signifies a generation that dedicates its life to the sole idea of a Jewish State, without recognizing any other ideals… Our aim is to make Betar such a world organism which, at a sign from the center, will be able simultaneously to move tens of thousands of hands in the cities of all countries… to make Eretz Yisrael the leading state of the civilized world, a country the customs and laws of which are to be followed by the whole universe.”–Jabotinsky’s IRON WALL doctrine

is the basis for the militant Israeli policies of terrorizing the Palestinians, in order to break their will to resist, teaching them the brutal lesson that resistance against the IDF is futile. Once the Palestinians learn the hopelessness of their situation, he theorized, they would accede to Israeli demands, based on the false hope of not being pushed out of Palestine altogether.

The evidence appears to confirm that on Sept. 11 there were two terror attacks, disguised as one. The Israeli secret services, or the neocon cabal directing the secret CIA rogue group, sandwiched secondary attacks and explosives into al Qaida’s operations in New York. The timing of the attacks was coordinated with intel made possible by the neocon network, using knowledge gained from Ali Mohamed connections. The separate attack upon the Pentagon was probably all the work of the parallel operation. The unknown is the extent of the neocon penetration into the Israeli government, or their involvement in the Israeli end of the plot to use the terror attacks to Israeli/neocon advantage. One thing we do know, is that the testimony of the infamous “dancing Israelis” of 9/11 revealed that there were Israelis who knew precisely when the attack was going to take place – “our purpose was to document the event.”

Further evidence shows that the Naval Operations Center in the Pentagon, that took a direct hit on 9/11, was the central location of all the material associated with the Jonathan Pollard Israeli spy ring, which had implicated the X Committee suspects. Does this further implicate Israel, or the neocon plotters, or both? Because of the involvement of the Wolfowitz cabal (through the Office of Special Plans disinformation operation) and the Ledeen connection to Ahmed Chalabi and the fabricated Niger yellow cake documents (in addition to Ledeen’s implication in the Operation Gladio terror campaign) the complicity of the neocon plotters in fabricating the evidence used to justify the Iraq war can no longer be in doubt. The weight of the circumstantial evidence and the gravity of the crimes that they are accused of, demands further investigation by the Justice Dept.

Further investigations will likely prove that the neocon objective (in addition to their Zionist ambitions) in engineering the Iraq war and the implications of their potential involvement in the attacks that started the war on terrorism, was to create the condition of perpetual war that would justify the destruction of democracy and the creation of the American fascist state. “Mistakes” in the Iraq war were most likely made intentionally, to establish a state of constructive chaos there, regardless of the cost in American and Iraqi lives. This is treason at its worst. Everyone associated with these intentional mistakes must be made to answer in American courts for treason, stemming from the murder of American soldiers.

If Israeli participation in the attacks is proven, then they would be obviously guilty of acts of war against the United States of America.

Angry Jews Assault Pittsburgh Protesters Against More Wars For Israel

[SEE: Over a hundred take part in anti-war protest in Pittsburgh before fight breaks out]


A peaceful anti-war protest was interrupted in Pittsburgh on Saturday when Zionists assaulted fellow anti-war protesters for daring to criticize Israel and wealthy American Jews for their role in instigating war with Iran.

The scuffle was heavily covered in the local media, and reported nationally. The Twitter video below of the standoff has received over 1 million views at the time of this writing.

On Saturday, over one hundred activists assembled in the Oakland section of Pittsburgh, in front of the Cathedral of Learning, to protest the United States’ assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, demanding America not start another war. A small contingent carried signs calling out the role of Zionists in America and abroad for pushing incessant wars in the Middle-East which benefit nobody but Israel.

The confrontation was provoked by signs the anti-Zionists held which read “Zionists Lie – Americans Die” and “Deport Kushner,” with caricatures of the notoriously corrupt Zionist oligarch, casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, worth $27 billion. and Jared Kushner, Trump’s Zionist son-in-law who is given free rein to push pro-Israel foreign policy in the Trump administration.

Adelson has contributed $10s of millions to Trump’s election campaigns in 2016 and 2020, and is by far Trump’s single largest financial backer. It is widely known that Adelson dictates to Trump what policies he must follow in the Middle East, and that John Bolton was installed at Adelson’s insistence. Adelson has financed Bolton’s career since the Iraq war. Bolton is known in Washington as ‘Adelson’s boy’.

Sheldon Adelson – sometimes a picture is worth 1000 words

Comments on the tweet of the signs tended to sympathize with the anti-Zionists, with many agreeing with the obvious truth that Israel and Jewish financial ‘donations’ to American politicians are behind the Middle East wars.

One anti-Zionist protester recorded the scene as their signs were ripped from their hands and torn apart, before being surrounded and physically pushed out by the mob as it chanted: “Nazis out!”

The demonstrators criticizing Israel were shoved off the square. Cameramen from local TV affiliates filmed it all, but the footage was not included in the evening broadcasts.
One of the Jewish demonstrators who assaulted the anti-Zionists

At no point during the confrontation did the anti-Zionists display any act of aggression or violence.

Here is a TV report from a local Pittsburgh station.

The Right-Wing Pro-Israel, Evangelical Agenda has Taken Over Trump’s Middle East Policy

The Right-Wing Pro-Israel, Evangelical Agenda has Taken Over Trump’s Middle East Policy

Until recently, President Donald Trump’s pro-Israel policy was centered on taking steps related to fulfilling campaign promises and strengthening his standing domestically with his evangelical base.

Chief among these steps was his decision to pull out of the nuclear accord with Iran, and the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel (and at the same time announcing moving the American embassy to Jerusalem). Trump also signed a presidential proclamation recognizing “Israeli sovereignty” over the Golan Heights.

All of this has changed, however, with the assassination of the commander of the Quds Force in Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) General Qassem Soleimani and the deputy head of the Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), Abu Mehdi Al-Muhandis.

By deciding to carry out this assassination operation, Trump has brought his pro-Israel policy to an entirely new, and dangerous level.

Targeting the IRGC and PMF: An Israeli policy

It is worth remembering that Israel set the precedent for carrying out lethal operations in Iraq by targeting elements of the IRGC and the PMF.

Israel began these operations last year, with the first taking place on July 19 near the Iraqi town of Amerli. Iranian media later reported that senior IRGC commander Abu Alfazl Sarabian had died in the attack.

Another Israeli attack on August 25 led to the death of a senior PMF commander in the Iraqi town of Al-Qaim near the border with Syria, while 21 PMF members were killed in an Israeli operation near the city of Hit in Iraq’s Anbar province on September 20.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu even admitted that Israel was behind these attacks.

“We are working against Iranian consolidation in Iraq as well [as in Syria]” remarked Netanyahu on August 22.

Trump administration officials adopt the Israel line of demonizing Iran

The Israeli fingerprints on U.S. policy could also be seen in the apparent stances taken by U.S. officials following the assassination of Soleimani and Al-Muhandis.

According to the New York Times, Trump administration officials have compared the assassination of Soleimani to the killing of former ISIS leader Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi. Such a comparison is no doubt to Israel’s liking.

Not only has Israel long sought to equate the IRGC and its allies, including the Lebanese Hezbollah and the Iraqi PMF, with terrorist groups like al-Qaida and ISIS, it has even described the latter groups as being the lesser of the two evils.

According to sources in Washington, one of the most common complaints made by visiting Israeli officials over the past years was that the U.S. was focusing too much on fighting Sunni Jihadist groups (al-Qaida, ISIS, etc.) and not enough on fighting Iran and its network of allies.

Israel’s former ambassador to Washington, Michael Oren referred to this dynamic in an interview with the Jerusalem Post back in September 2013, where he summed up the Israeli policy regarding Syria. “The initial message about the Syrian issue was that we always wanted (President) Bashar Assad to go” he stated, further adding; “we always preferred the bad guys who weren’t back by Iran (al-Qaida affiliates) to the bad guys who were backed by Iran”.

For his part, former Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon referred to an “axis of evil‘ comprising Iran, Syria, and Lebanon.

Yaalon made those remarks during a meeting with former chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey in August 2013, underscoring that this “axis of evil” must not emerge victorious in Syria.

Israel may have found in the Trump administration the perfect ally when it comes to the demonization of Iran and the groups it supports.

Hard-core evangelicals like Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Vice President Mike Pence have a strong ideological affinity for Israel and its anti-Iranian agenda.

During a Senate hearing last April, Pompeo repeated the long-debunked claim that Iran and al-Qaida have cooperated for years. “There is no doubt there is a connection between the Islamic Republic of Iran and al-Qaida. Period, full stop,” Pompeo asserted.

Pence, meanwhile, has even gone so far as to claim that Soleimani was involved with 9/11. Following the assassination, Pence tweeted that Soleimani had “assisted in the clandestine travel of 10 of the 12 terrorists who carried out the September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States.”

American troops in danger as a result of the Israeli evangelical agenda

With the assassination of Soleimani and Al-Muhandes, Israel and its Christian evangelical allies in Washington appear to have succeeded more than any time before in steering Trump’s foreign policy. Their success, however, may have placed U.S. troops in the region in grave danger.

In a speech commemorating the death of Soleimani and Al-Muhandes, the leader of the Lebanese Hezbollah Hassan Nasrallah warned that retaliation would be aimed at U.S. military assets.

In remarks which brought back the memories of the 1983 attacks on the Marine Barracks in Beirut, Nasrallah suggested that the U.S. military presence in the region would become a target for suicide bombers.

“The suicide attackers who forced the Americans to leave our region in the past are still here today and in far greater numbers,” Nasrallah asserted.

A State of War Exists Between the US and Humanity

A State of War Exists Between the US and Humanity

by Stephen Lendman

There’s no ambiguity about what’s going on globally.

Washington’s geopolitical agenda is all about seeking dominance over other countries, their resources and populations worldwide — by whatever it takes to achieve its aims, notably by brute force and other hostile actions.

The Trump regime’s assassination of Iran’s IRGC Quds Force commander General Qassem Soleimani and Iraqi deputy PMU leader Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis (connected to the country’s military) were the latest examples of its state’s sponsored terrorism on the world stage.

Since Harry Truman’s aggression on North Korea in the early 1950s, a state of war has existed between the US and humanity.

It’s been ongoing endlessly since that time, smashing one nation after another by naked aggression, color revolutions, old-fashioned coups, economic terrorism, targeted assassinations, and other hostile actions.

No nation in world history caused more harm to more people over a longer duration than the US — a hegemonic menace, masquerading as democratic, a notion it tolerates nowhere, especially not at home.

Today is the most perilous time in world history, the risk of another global conflict real — potentially with nuclear weapons able to kill us all if used in enough numbers.

Most Americans are mindless of the greatest threat in their lifetimes because establishment media treat them like mushrooms — keeping them well-watered and in the dark.

Trump is a geopolitical know-nothing, a billionaire businessman/reality TV president — aware only about what his extremist handlers tell him, along with Fox News propaganda, his favorite TV station.

His regime’s assassination of Iranian and Iraqi military commanders is symptomatic of a nation off-the-rails, threatening everyone everywhere by its hegemonic rage.

He’s not the issue. If not him, someone else in charge would pursue the same agenda — dirty business as usual no matter who in the US serves in high office — in the White House, Congress, the bureaucracy and judicial branch.

That’s America’s disturbing state — today more threatening to humanity than earlier, at home and abroad.

Its criminal class is bipartisan, both warrior wings of its one-party state as menacing to humanity as the other.

In the wake of Trump regime assassinations, acts of war on Iran and Iraq, events are fast-moving.

On Sunday during an emergency session, Iraqi parliamentarians voted to expel US occupying and coalition forces, demanding it supported by Prime Minister Mahdi.

Two major parliamentary factions strongly backed the measure — the Fatah Alliance and prominent cleric Muqtada al-Sadr-led Sairoon.

Press TV reported that MPs “cit(ed) Articles 59 and 109 of the (Iraqi) Constitution” — expulsion “in line with their national and regulatory responsibilities as representatives to safeguard the security and sovereignty of Iraq.” 

US forces were allowed back in the country to combat the scourge of ISIS — created and supported by Washington.

In late 2017, military operations against their jihadists were concluded. Iraqi parliamentarians and ruling authorities want US occupation of the country ended.

According to adopted legislation, Baghdad is required to file a formal complaint with the UN Security Council against US aggression on its territory.

Fatah Alliance head/Badr Organization secretary general Hadi al-Ameri called for expelling US forces from the country, saying the following:

“We will defeat Americans and drive them out, as we did earlier in the face of Daesh (ISIS).” 

“We will expel Americans right before Iraqis’ eyes as they will be frustrated and humiliated.”

“We will press ahead with this struggle. We don’t have any option but to fully restore Iraq’s sovereignty.”

Time and again, Trump tweets and otherwise comments before he thinks.

On Sunday following Iraqi MPs voting for the expulsion of US forces, he said the following:

“We’re not leaving (Iraq) unless they pay us back for” what the US spent in the country — to smash it and massacre its people for decades, he failed to explain, adding:

“If they do ask us to leave…(w)e will charge them sanctions like they’ve never seen before ever.”

Iraq is US-occupied territory, threatening its sovereignty, population, and the region.

As long as US forces remain anywhere in the Middle East, and Washington continues supplying billions of dollars worth of heavy weapons to its belligerent nations, regional peace, stability and security will remain unattainable.

Ahead of Sunday’s vote by Iraqi parliamentarians, the Trump regime tried and failed to stop it.

Ongoing turmoil in the country with US dirty hands behind it makes it uncertain what’s coming next.

Pentagon forces will likely be forced out of Iraq, when and under what circumstances uncertain. It could be a long time coming or sooner. It’s too early to know either way.

Assassinating widely respected Iranian and Iraqi military commanders was a colossal Trump regime blunder.

It elevated them to martyr status, making them more prominent in death than alive, arousing the people of both countries, uniting them against the US hegemonic menace.

Only Cassandra was good at predicting future events. What’s ahead remains unknown for mere mortals like myself.

If past is prologue, most likely things will be more dismal than already, at home and abroad.

Endless US wars of aggression against nonbelligerent countries may continue in our lifetimes, new ones launched, hordes of newly recruited US terrorist foot soldier replacing eliminated ones.

Forever wars are the new normal, ones launched by the US post-9/11 continuing with no near-term prospect for resolution.

Along with Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Donbass (Ukraine), Occupied Palestine, and Iraq, Iran is in the eye of the storm.

Will the Trump regime attack Islamic Republic territory in the new year? 

Will it risk the mother of all post-9/11 wars by going this far, boiling over the region more greatly than already, risking blockage of regional oil supplies to world markets — severe global recession conditions to follow if this happens and it’s protracted.

If Trump regime hardliners unleash greater Middle East fire and fury than already by attacking Iranian territory, global war could follow.

I believe US hot war with Iran is unlikely because of its potentially catastrophic consequences if launched.

At the same time, with hardliners in charge of US geopolitical policymaking in both right wings of its war party, the unthinkable is ominously possible.

VISIT MY WEBSITE: stephenlendman.org (Home – Stephen Lendman). Contact at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.