New Air Force for Iran—Iran to Purchase Sukhoi-30 Fighter Jets From Russia

[ Lifting Sanctions Will Release $100 Billion To Iran. Then What? ; List of aircraft of the Iranian Air Force]

Iran to Purchase Sukhoi-30 Fighter Jets From Russia

abcnews_logo_v2

 

Iran will sign a contract with Russia for the purchase of Sukhoi-30 fighter jets, Iran’s defense minister said Wednesday.

In comments published on the ministry of defense website, Gen. Hossein Dehghan did not specify how many fighter planes Iran will buy, or give a timeline for the signing of the deal. However, he said that under the agreement Iran would also be involved in the production of the aircraft.

Iran needs to “seriously focus on the air force and fighters,” he said. “We are moving toward a contract. We told them that we need to be involved in the production (of the plane) as well.”

Iran’s acquisition is significant given its role as a regional power in the volatile Middle East, where it is backing opposite sides in conflicts in Yemen and Syria to its longtime rival Saudi Arabia.

The fighter jet is believed to be comparable to the American F-15E fighter bomber.

Iran’s air force still heavily depends on domestically modified versions of long-outdated warplanes, including former Soviet MiGs and American F14A Tomcats from the 1970s.

Dehghan also rejected reports that Iran has negotiated the purchase of J10 fighter jets from China.

Russia has already started delivering S-300 air defense missile systems to Iran. The advanced defensive weapons system deal was frozen in 2010 due to U.N sanctions.

Russian President Vladimir Putin approved delivery of the air defense missile system in April 2015, a move that will significantly bolster the Islamic Republic’s military capability.

Dehghan said the first Iranian crews, who have been trained in Russia, will return home within the next two or three days and another group will be dispatched for training subsequently.

Iranian efforts to build up its air power is mostly a homegrown project, tweaking older technology or using domestic know-how to build its first generations of spy and attack drones. Iran has also made progress in developing its missile program.

Searching for the next great Enemy, to justify the next US Military Aggression

Empire USA déclin

The interview (transcript below)  from questions with Prof. John McMurtry was conducted for the 15th Anniversary of “Geopolitika” a journal of geopolitical and cultural analysis in Belgrade which was broadcast on Radio Belgrade by the weekly show “Silen” on February 12 from questions posed by Biljana Đorović.

The depth of the abyss into which the world is falling is ever clearer to people, but not the cause or the way out. Could you give us some kind of structure to explain what is at the heart of this empire of chaos that is reigning across the world?

In a nutshell, social evolution itself has been reversed by a US-led war on social and ecological life organisation driven by one corrupt master value – to free transnational corporations and their shareholders from social responsibility to multiply private fortunes without limit. It is a counter-revolution against the long development of democratic government and the welfare state that once crossed across the divisions of the Cold War.

The ultimate driver of the disorder can be explained in one underlying principle. The sole and absolute organising principle of the world’s reproduction and growth is turning private money into maximally more money for private money controllers. The ‘empire of chaos’ is the result.

The more this transnational financial capitalism is deregulated and subsidized , the more it multiplies itself through organic, social and ecological life hosts, the more predatorily destructive it becomes at all levels. This is ultimately a cancer system at the macro level, and it has quickly spread through the world. It was effectively with the Reagan-Thatcher counter-revolution against the social state with a US $500-billion tax-cut to the rich deliberately bankrupting the base of social programs, simultaneously pervasive media worship of the ‘free market’ and hatred of socialism, behind-the-scenes presidential permission of mass media monopolies proclaiming this mindless propaganda line, the systematic smashing of organised labour and sites of progressive intellectual discourses, ghoulish leashing of death squads in Latin Central America to reverse socialist forces while spending the opposing superpower USSR into bankruptcy on the arms race, and – finally but perhaps most importantly – preparation and passing of the world’s first major binding treaty absolutizing transnational corporate rights over all past or future democratic policies or legislation reducing foreign profit opportunities.

This sets the historical parameters of the current empire of chaos by reversing the post-1945 social evolution towards life security for all by the master principle of commodity and money-demand maximization across cultures and permanent war against any alternative.

How could this possibly be proclaimed, as it always has been, a victory for global freedom morality and justice?

The key is always in the US-designated Enemy whose destruction is equated to the victory of Good over Evil. There is no positive substance of the Good but destruction of the designated Enemy. There is in fact no common life interest of US civilization. There is the Enemy that must be defeated on the collective level, the sole collectivity. The money that must be made to survive is the only obligatory individual value, with self-maximization the logic of success.

The global turning point to ‘Communism’ as the Enemy came in 1991 with the fall of the USSR. This was triumphally proclaimed the victory of US freedom, the death of marxism and socialism, and the end of history itself.

In fact, the USSR fell by being hollowed out by the arms race and the Cold War, a deliberate US strategy, and from fighting the first jihadi terrorist uprising financed by the US in quasi-socialist Afghanistan. It was on Russia’s border, and the way to “bleed Russia to death” when it intervened to assist the secular social order with new equality for women. Yugoslavia at this same time was an iconically successful socialist society across ethnic divisions. But its US-led financial destruction was planned by secret presidential directive in 1981, and led to a chaos of ethnic wars and hatred ending in the 1999 bombing of Belgrade by NATO – – which was also during the US-British sanction bombing of Iraq, and more society-destroying bombings to come across the Middle East. Now the new designated Enemy was Saddam once the USSR fell.

One can see here that always a great Enemy is declared. It was long Communism which covered any alternative secular order with any socially owned economic base, the real danger being that it outperforms capitalist societies in serving the life needs of its people. But no sooner had this threat been apparently eliminated in even the Third World with death squads, international slanders and financial sabotage usually doing the trick than a new great Enemy called Saddam was declared just as the USSR was falling next door and unable to intervene.

Another new war, worse than the Cold War went into motion. As always there was constructed pretext, but this time without any USSR to limit it, the US (and Britain) bombed the long-evolved socialist infrastructure of Iraq into ruins and perpetrated an eco-genocidal invasion from 1991 to 2003 that was, as always, justified by the Enemy it attacked – although the enemy Saddam was long on the CIA payroll, just as Osama Laden, the next great Enemy to appear, was financed and armed by the US in Afghanistan to begin the new greatest enemy of all replacing Communism.

This Enemy is Islamic Terror which still morphs on into ISIS suddenly appearing in June 2014 to keep the ball rolling into Syria bombing by NATO, a reprise of the complete society destruction of Libya by US-led NATO bombing in 2011. The end of the Cold War gave rise not to peace, but wars of aggression by the US whenever it could take the people along with false cover stories. The constant throughout is a great Enemy, the cornerstone of US ideology, with constructed pretext or false flag event always justifying war against the now perpetually changing Enemy – in fact, sitting duck with no air defenses to stop imperial bombing and expansion of the transnational money-cancer system.

Do you think there is a fundamental difference between the US-led empire during the Cold War and after it? The years of the US-Soviet conflict seem almost pastoral compared to now.

1991 was supposed to bring about the great Peace Dividend with no US enemy to justify the always rising military spending to stop the “communist plot for world rule”. Now we know better who was aiming for world rule, as always projecting onto the designated Enemy the US’s own objective. The carpet bombings of helpless societies by US-led forces since 1991 are, like Vietnam, eco-genocidal in nature, only now one after another. They force-metastasize the exponential private financial growth of Wall Street and company, but transnational corporate treaty and social-state stripping is the ultimate inner logic of the US-led spreading chaos.

Before 1991, the US and allies had developed social life support systems and a welfare state to compete with state socialism. No longer. Since the fall of the USSR, whole peoples and their life conditions are destroyed and looted across continents from Yugoslavia to the Ukraine, from Iraq to Libya to Syria to who knows where next. Propelling every degenerate trend from behind has been the carcinomic financialization of real economies into multiplying private money sequences devouring life and life support systems as ‘global market freedom and prosperity’. This is the borderless transnational globalization of the private money-power system that has changed all the rules.

Dividing societies into civil war or helpless bankruptcy or both is the new and unnamed master pattern, destroying whatever collective economic and social success has been achieved everywhere, clearing s the way for foreign control of once sovereign resources, markets and peoples. Greece is a current example of these external money sequences cored in transnational banks hollowing out an evolved Western society to recoup foreign bank revenues after the Wall-Street-engineered bank collapse of 2008 – stripping ever more peoples to pay for big banks’ ponzi schemes even if the society’s unemployment goes over 30%, the public sector is dismantled and looted at fire-sale prices, and the majority’s lives and life conditions are turned towards the living hell formerly reserved for the Third World death-squad dictatorships.

This systemic money-sequenced destruction of evolved societies, their public resources and life support systems is now plundering all societies including the US and Britain. It is inconceivable that what is now normalized as “necessary market reforms” today could have been even proposed by these countries from 1950 to 1991. But things have also changed at the oppositional level. Latin America has largely evolved out of the US-led oligarchies of fascist tyranny.

Why is this underlying pattern – essentially a global multi-front war against humanity – not recognised in even academic discourses?

This is a very complex matter in all the levels of systemic degeneration and attack. The inherited methods and categories of understanding are incapable of comprehension so long as they are divided into siloes, mechanistically organised into atomic agents and aggregates, and increasingly funded for proprietary corporate research for profit.

The academy led by its own multiplying corporate managements has been largely converted into a servo-mechanism to the financial cancer system, a long war, with a new underclass of casualized worker- profs doing most of the teaching with no time for research. System diagnosis is prohibited at every step by this context. Marxist analysis itself is bound to categories unable to grasp the system’s disorder where more means and conditions of life are now destroyed than produced.

So-called ‘economics’ is most of all a set-point of the self-referential stupefaction. It is based on a life-blind liquid mechanics of the nineteenth century disguised by algebraic notations whose referents are idealized money coordinates in dyadic and exponential repetitions. The reigning models are structured a-priori not to see any of the real-life failures and depredations of the runaway disorder. Policy-setting ‘economics’ is without any framework to factor in the life needs of people, societies and environments at all. Academically trained critics name the problem as ‘neo-liberalism’, but this is a vacuously equivocal slogan. – – The classical liberals John Stuart Mill and John Dewey were both mild socialists and advocated a reasoned social progress of humanity’s permanent life interests, which this transnational private money-sequence system rules out in principle.

Could you say more about the “false ruling categories” misleading even the academic Left and most concerned citizens?

To begin with, this system is not as almost everyone assumes, a ‘free market’. Its trade and investment treaties across borders prove it to be a transnational corporate dictatorship in principle. Corporate lawyers write all the rules in secret. They override the policies of elected legislatures. Global supply and demand are controlled by dominant transnational corporations. Open market competition is ruled out by predatory and transfer pricing, corporate lobby control of state policies, and vast and growing government subsidies to favoured players.

While “the free market” is still absurdly assumed as given, “efficiency” is even more universally assumed as its regulating discipline and logic of progress. Indeed it is the justification for all the jobs continuously lost, all the deregulations, pollutions, resource-mining horrors, and inhuman exploitations from one place to the next across the globe.

Yet in fact this system is the opposite of ‘efficient’ in life means production and reproduction – the substance of any real economy. What is miscalled ‘efficiency’ merely lowers money costs for private profit agents. In reality, this system is now by far the most wasteful system ever, wasting more life value than it produces. 90% of the biomass it converts into commodities for profit end up as waste within six weeks. 40% of even final food products are thrown away without consumption. Fresh water lakes and aquifers are everywhere polluted and drawn down without efficient water use entering the equations. .

‘Absence of waste’ is the definition of efficiency. But this system wastes everything to multiply private money sequences with ever more people jobless, species in spasm extinctions, oceans poisoned and hollowed out, junks of every kind becoming more dominant across domains.

Do you think there are dark corridors of power where the game is rigged by master manipulators with their own ruling goals and forms of action? If so, what are they

Well they definitely exist as a self-flattering transnational money party bending the system to limitless rule. In the cases I know, the imaginary global free market is covertly structured to make private money rights sovereign over all that exists with no accountability to any human or ecological life need at all. This is conceived as “global market freedom”. The corrupt self-conceit is mind-stopping.

Banker David Rockefeller elliptically expressed this program back in 1991. “A supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and bankers”, he intoned to fellow Bilderburgers, “is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries”. This statement has never been denied. It implicitly entails a dark meaning. The ruling goal and form of action is to stop history’s democratic trend, to end peoples bonded by national identity, to override people’s say over their collective future, to eliminate public sectors except as serving this private money sovereign, and to accept this banker sovereignty as the proper replacement of the self-determination of nations and peoples.

Banker Rockefeller only refers to the ‘intellectual elite’ to deploy their Platonic conceit. He is more ignorant than they that Plato’s ‘philosopher kings’ live in community ownership of goods without private money gain to corrupt their reason by the lowest level of the soul, the self’s appetites. In contrast, Rockefeller’s ‘intellectual elite’ are exemplified by Rockefeller’s own money-obsequious German protégé, Leo Strauss who preaches the sovereignty of private money over society in Talmudic style that is hard to decipher. Yet as Rockefeller’s parachuted University of Chicago professor and godfather of the U.S. National Security Council, Strauss affirms the goal in his Natural Right and History: “limitless [money] capital accumulation” is “a moral duty and perhaps the highest moral duty”. Wasted expenditures at will , no productive function, genocides of the conquered, each and all are rationalized away by Strauss as moral rectitude by the ‘natural right’ of private money capital. He justifies every one.

This is only one dark corridor leading to the financial cancer system we face today. Its NSC branch rooted in Harvard’s graduate apparatus of ‘political science’ over decades is still dominated by the Russia-hating Zbigniew Brzezinski. Undergirded by the more substantial ‘free market’ worship dominating graduate schools everywhere up to US presidential appointees, all agents are propelled by big corporate and bank money power which they all worship. This ultimate money power explicitly and bilaterally seeks ‘full spectrum dominance’ of the world, as in the 2000 project for a New American Century signed by US leaders and advisers across parties. Its dark vision was then followed into 9-11 and the 9-11 Wars.

9-11 itself was corridors covered by darkness in how it happened. The first question of forensic justice, cui bon (who benefits?), remains publicly silenced. The official conspiracy theory of the World Trade Center buildings melting and collapsing into their own footprints violated the laws of physics at every step, beginning with the blamed Arabs with box-cutters and no remains. The US secret state is so covered in dark hidden corners that we can only predict in principle what will happen next – for recent example, the fully-armed ISIS killing machine springing onto the stage out of nowhere mass murdering everywhere it can, but somehow never touches Israel.

But a cautionary word. The deep global game-changers here are institutional moves at the level of sweeping trade treaties and thousands of new bureaucratic laws and regulations. They silently replace sovereign government and democratically legislated policies and laws everywhere “to compete in the global market”, with few observing that they are massive corporate-lawyer fiats multiplying protections of transnational business profits as their single unifying objective. They too are secret in negotiations, corporate lobby construction, thousands of pages of prescriptions, and closed tribunals punishing states which disobey. It is hard to see where the dark financial global coup d’etat stops.

Could you step us through a paradigm case of this financcial cancer system’ at work and how progressive voices fail to see its meaning?

The recently released Oxfam Davos Report (January 16) is a perfect example because it clearly succeeds in informing us of the escalating extremes of inequality which this system has produced – a fact on which now everyone agrees. The first essential fact it identifies reports from global business statistics that 62 individuals now own more wealth than 50% of the world’s population. More shockingly, the second essential fact reported is that this share of wealth by half the world’s people has collapsed by over 40% in the last five years.

Yet even in this report the big lie continues that “the world has made great progress in tackling world poverty” and that “extreme poverty has been halved since 1990”. The near automatic assumption that the poor are being “lifted out of poverty in greater numbers” thus persists even though the business evidence itself shows that, in fact, the poorer half of humanity has lost 42% of their wealth in just the last few years. What does this mean for “trickle-down theory”, “global competition nets more wealth for all”, and “Parteo optimal markets”? It means that they are all delusionary. The World Bank and other figures purporting to show great gains for the poor are based on income gains of less than a cup of coffee a day – typically of emigrants forced into big polluted cities who formerly had at least a family home, clean air and green surroundings.

Yet observe that throughout the revolutionary redistribution of wealth from the poor to the rich, the magic of the market and globalization are proclaimed as “enhanced competition”, “liberalized de-regulation”, “‘more labour flexibility”, “reduced welfare costs” and “austerity programs to correct excesses”. In fact beneath the pervasive propaganda conditioning citizens to believe in the money shell game devouring the world, the poorer half of humanity has been deprived of one trillion dollars of wealth in five years while the 62 richest people have gained almost twice as much for themselves by the operations of this system.

But the end is not yet. Other figures in the Davos Report show that a further $760 billion flowing to non-producing investors has been gained by transnational tax evasion with impunity across the world. This is another revolutionary turn of ‘globalization’ to enrich the richest while doubling down on deprivation of the poor. Yet at the same time, it strips the funding of public sectors and institutions which have evolved to serve the common life interest of societies outside the global market. Governments which could once protect the deprived at all levels of life organization are now widely bankrupted or debt enslaved along with most citizens. Who has reported any of this?

In consequence, the world slips into deeper recession from the collapse of demand at the public and majority levels as the poorest half’s share of wealth is almost halved and the share of the richest is more than doubled for accumulation. But this cause of the Great Recession is ignored by governments and international policy meetings as if it did not exist.

As these and other facts show, borderless and de-regulated corporate globalization is eating the world alive. That is why these facts are never reported by the mass media or politicians. It is why claimed actions to stop the world bleeding never face the system disorder causing them. It is why even concerned organizations continue to repeat falsehoods as if they were true. Once again like a cancer system at the macro level, this exponentially multiplying private money-sequence system has no committed life functions but to feed on life and life conditions to grow itself. But what progressive journal or even book connects all of these dots?

Can there be any resolution to the fragmentation and paralysis of unifying vision?

Our problem now is that is not even the informed and the progressive join the dots and realise the meaning of their own senses and the rising evidence. As with Oxfam, they pre-consciously deny the collapsing position of the majority of humankind by repeating the lies of the ruling doctrine like ‘progress in eliminating poverty’ and ‘halving of absolute destitution’.

Nowhere is the criterion of human needs across cultures identified. Nowhere are the truly ‘changed rules of the game’ specified and shown as cause of the systemic catastrophes for humanity and planetary life support systems. Nowhere do we see a policy-structure change spelled out that connects across crises. Yet everywhere the diagnosis and tracking of financial- ization can detect and show the CSC drivers of world society today.

Resolution requires recognition of the ultimately regulating principle of humanity’s social evolution that moves underneath technological development to what it is for and the basic institutional bases to rule out the great blind alleys of post-1900 social evolution such as state Stalinism and global financialization. The underlying pattern of progress is now lost in superstructural debates, but is control of currency and credit by public-bank authority linked to defined life standards of investment and production to protect human beings and their shared life support systems. History shows this underlying pattern of progress in varying degrees such as the Scandinavian countries and the old Yugoslavia, but a conscious life code has been lacking at the society-wide level. This missing link is a life-coherent collective value system  translated into self-evident principles of how to live as a society beyond individual choices.

I leave this ultimate issue and its challenges to our next discussion.

John McMurtry is University Professor Emeritus at the University of Guelph and elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. His work has been translated from Latin America to Japan, and he is the author/editor of UNESCO’s three-volume Philosophy and World Problems, as well as more recently, The Cancer Stage of Capitalism; From Crisis to Cure.

“We Indians are all Americans nowadays, open to American think tanks to show us the way out of darkness.”

“We Indians are all Americans nowadays, open to American think tanks to show us the way out of darkness.”— M K Bhadrakumar 

[I seldom, if ever, find myself in agreement with MK Bhadrakumar, the former Indian govt minister, but I have to admit that this time, he nailed the current Indian state of mind with the preceding statement.  India, like the loyal lap dogs that they are, consistently follow American leaders and their think tanks deeper into the darkness of planned chaos, always believing that the Utopian Light of the “American Century” is “just up ahead.”  They kowtow to the Americans just as they did for the British under the previous “Raj.”  The only difference is that under the new “American Raj,” compliance and obedience is obtained without necessary force and physical measures.  Hindu nationalists are nearly always ready to extend American leaders the benefit of the doubt.]

Where competing interests converge for US, China

rediff_logo

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace brought out a paper recently on the United States’ policy options toward the Central Asian region in the period ahead following the drawdown of American troops in Afghanistan. Three pundits rooted in the Russia and Eurasia Program at the Carnegie co-authored the paper and what distinguishes them is also their long stints in the US state department and National Security Council, and/or the intelligence community.

In a nutshell, the paper estimates that

  • The Central Asian region is at the threshold of a profound geopolitical shift characterized by receding Russian influence, an elevation of China’s influence, and a diminishing interest in the Euro-Atlantic community;
  • Russia and China remain the region’s principal political, economic and security partners, but Russia is incapable of matching China’s surge as the top economic partner;
  • The US should steer clear of zero-sum mindset and instead “seek to harness Russian and Chinese actions to advance US interests”.

The Carnegie scholars have argued out their case with great reasoning and their recommendations would become inputs for the US’ regional policies toward Central Asia. The point is, it is difficult to quarrel with their stunning conclusion best recapitulated in the following two sentences:

  • The occasional expressions of American interests notwithstanding, Central Asia will be of limited importance to the United States… Accordingly, US policy toward Central Asia has to be rebalanced to bring Amercian commitments into better alignment with its limited aims and means.

From an Indian perspective, the Carnegie Paper provides much food for thought. In a much smaller way, though, many of the American policy predicaments are similar to India’s too. India’s predicaments would have a greater sense of immediacy given the region’s geographical proximity. To be sure, the impending membership of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization is bound to intertwine India’s geo-strategies with those of the countries of that region like at no time before in the post-Soviet era of regional politics.

Indeed, the key question concerns the shift in the tectonic plates of the Central Asian region’s geopolitics, devolving upon the unstoppable, irreversible, inexorable surge of China as the region’s by-far preeminent partner-cum-benefactor. The Carnegie paper makes a clinical evaluation of China’s profile in Central Asia. Principally,

  • China has emerged as the region’s most significant geopolitical and economic actor;
  • But, how Beijing plans to exercise its influence remains unclear;
  • Unlike Russia, China has not claimed the region as “a sphere of privileged interests”;
  • China keeps a low profile on security issues;
  • China is disinterested in any projection of military power into the region or establishment of military bases there;
  • Nor is China interested in proposing any collective security organization for the region;
  • China channels its security activities primarily through the SCO;
  • SCO’s focus being on counter-terrorism, China’s real preoccupation is the security of Xinjiang rather than “ambitious plans for expansion beyond its border”;
  • China’s vast economic stakes in Central Asia notwithstanding, Beijing “prefers to rely on political rather than military means to protect its equities”;

No doubt, even making allowance for Washington’s game plan to create misgivings in the Russian mind regarding the ‘yellow peril’ and to thwart Moscow’s ‘pivot’ to Beijing to gain strategic depth to offset the US’ containment strategy, the Carnegie paper has made an audacious conclusion that “China has become the region’s indispensable partner and patron” and China’s political and economic support support will be in times to come “an essential precondition for any new leader in Central Asia to consolidate and remain in power”. It overlooks the ingenuity of the Central Asian mind, which can be inscrutable while remaining very focused on self-preservation.

However, the Carnegie paper is far from advocating that the US should counter China’s deepening and expanding presence in the Central Asian region. For one thing, even if China delivers only 50 percent of what it has pledged by way of economic assistance in projects, US is not going to be able to match it. Second, even a limited US intervention in the region will need “cooperation and possibly coordination or at least consent” from China. Third, China has “far greater interests in the region and assets stationed nearby” than the US to be a provider of security. Fourth, the shrinking military footprint in Afghanistan makes Central Asia even less important for US strategies.

The punch line comes here: “American policy toward Central Asia should be based on the premise that it is a region of convergent rather than competitive interests… Thus, wherever possible and appropriate, Washington should better harness…(the) Chinese presence in the region to its favor… Similarly, Washington should not try to impede China’s Silk Road Economic Belt initiative. It is not necessary and will prove ineffective for Washington to take an overly competitive approach to challenging Chinese… political, economic, and security engagement in the region”.

Of course, this new thinking is already evident in the convergence between the US and China in promoting the Afghan peace talks. (See my blog Hopes rekindled for Afghan peace process.)

Where does all this leave India’s regional policies? Frankly, Pakistani diplomacy seems to grasp these undercurrents in regional politics far better than we have been able to do. The Indian pundit takes a one-dimensional view of the power dynamic. Suffice it to say, India’s ability to optimally take advantage of the SCO forum will depend largely on its capacity to understand that Central Asia and South Asia can be regions of “convergent rather than competitive interests” with China. In sum, it depends on its ability to think big and in the long-term.

But the Indian pundit has a long way to go to reset his (or her) archaic mindset to let in the fresh air of realism. As things stand, even the construction of an obscure sea port on the Bangladesh coastline gets magnified to epic proportions as the stuff of a titanic struggle against China by the Gang of Three — India, US and Japan. When fancy takes wings, it soars high from terra firma. This is where the Carnegie Paper could have a sobering effect. After all, we Indians are all Americans nowadays, open to American think tanks to show us the way out of darkness. Read the Carnegie paper here.

Posted in Politics.

Tagged with , , , , , , , .

AF General Faints While Trying To Explain F-35 Fiasco

‘What F-35 will do to ya’: Air Force general faints at Pentagon briefing on plane budget

Russia-Today

 

© CNN
Air Force Maj. Gen. James F. Martin Jr. fainted at the rostrum during a media briefing when he was talking about the F-35 plane in Pentagon on Wednesday.

The high-ranking officer was delivering a report on the Air Force budget and in particular about the future of the ill-fated F-35 program when he experienced a dizzy spell.

Assistant Air Force Secretary Carolyn Gleason rushed to Martin’s side and grabbed him by the arm. “That’s what the F-35 will do to ya,” Gleason was heard to say in a joke.

On February 10, the Pentagon reported that troubled US F-35 fighter jet needs more engine changes.

The general was taken to a rest room and then to hospital for a medical check-up.

It was later revealed that he was suffering from a cold. He returned to work Wednesday and was said to be fine, according to Air Force Times.

Russia Opens Syrian Kurdistan mission

Syrian Kurdistan mission opens in Moscow

Russia-Today

 

Officials attend a ceremony opening a representative office of Syrian Kurdistan, with a portrait of jailed Kurdish leader Abdullah Ocalan of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) seen in the background in Moscow, Russia, February 10, 2016. © Maxim Shemetov
An NGO representative office for Syrian Kurdistan has opened in Moscow. It was created to represent the interests of Syrian Kurds and develop bilateral relations with Russia, the mission’s head said.

Our aim is to strengthen and develop relations with the Russian side, including its civil organizations, political parties, academics,” a member of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD), Abd Salam Muhammad Ali, who will head the mission, told RT in an exclusive interview.

He explained that Syrian Kurds are facing a number of problems that they would like to discuss with the international community.

We naturally would like to take part in Geneva-3 [talks on Syria], but there are a number of regional forces led by Turkey who have stood up against it, threatening that they would quit should Kurds, the PYD party, or other democratic self-ruling representatives participate in the talks in Geneva,” Abd Salam Muhammad Ali said.

The PYD is the political wing of the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG), which took full control of the Syrian town of Kobani last year, making it a powerful symbol of Kurdish resistance to Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL). US officials have recently traveled to northern Syria to meet with YPG members, prompting a strong reaction from Turkey’s president. Branding both the PYD and the YPG as “terrorist organizations,” Recep Tayyip Erdogan told Washington it had to choose between Turkey and, as he put it, the “terrorists” as US partners.

Before the US officials’ visit, the PYD was excluded from peace talks in Geneva after Ankara threatened to boycott the talks if Kurdish party members were invited.

READ MORE: No terrorists at the table? Turkey ‘threatens to withdraw’ from Syria talks over Syrian Kurds

The Moscow mission head pointed out that other states, such as Russia and the US, understand the Kurds’ essential role in fighting international terror organizations in the region, “with no real results being possible to achieve” without them, while warning that “we have a clear position: if we are not participating in Geneva talks, then all decisions made at the negotiations will not be recognized and observed by us.”

Turkey, on the other hand, is aiding the jihadists in the region, Abd Salam Muhammad Ali claimed, saying that the Kurds have information that Turkish secret services are operating in Syria disguised as local civilians. He also said that Ankara “helps Islamic State and does not take any action to prevent the flow of militants from around the world, letting them arrive to Syria through Turkey.”

At the same time, some international players have a “strange” attitude towards the Syrian Kurds, another of the Kurdish mission’s representatives told RT.

Everyone understands that Kurds are actively involved in all processes on the Syrian territory. And the unwillingness to include Kurdish representatives in Geneva-3 talks demonstrates that Syrian Kurdistan is perceived as a force that is only allowed to take part in military actions,” Farkhat Patiev, a member of Kurdistan’s national congress, said.

Pointing out that the Syrian Kurds have been militarily cooperating with the US since the battle for the town of Kobani, where the US-led coalition supported them from the air, Patiev stressed that it is also important to develop and broaden political dialogue.

All forces fighting against international terrorism, no matter if they are Russian, American, or European, should cooperate in defeating the common terror threat, he added.

READ MORE: Russia has offered US ‘concrete plan’ to end Syrian crisis – Lavrov

The PYD party has supported and welcomed Russian campaign in Syria from its very first days. We will stand by any country that will help the Syrian people fight terrorists, radical groups, and bandits such as never seen before,” Abd Salam Muhammad Ali said. Furthermore, the fight against Islamic State, Al Nusra, and other radical groups should intensify in Syria, the mission head added, asserting that the Kurds are ready to cooperate with Russia on that.

Turkey’s Syria strategy lies in ruins as rebel-held Aleppo teeters

Turkey’s Syria strategy lies in ruins as rebel-held Aleppo teeters

Thousands of Syrians stranded along Turkish border

Thousands of Syrians stranded along Turkish border 02:46

Story highlights

  • Gönül Tol: If the last major supply route to rebels in Aleppo falls, regime and Kurdish forces could control the Turkey-Syria border
  • Already with more than 2 million refugees, Turkey fears the fall of Aleppo will send many more fleeing toward the border, she says
  • Turkey’s worst-case scenario might unfold if the Kurds create an autonomous region from the Iraqi border to Afrin, Syria

Gönül Tol is the founding director of The Middle East Institute’s Center for Turkish Studies. She also teaches at George Washington University’s Institute for Middle East Studies and writes a weekly column for the liberal Turkish daily Radikal. She has written extensively on Turkey-U.S. relations, Turkish domestic politics, and foreign policy and the Kurdish issue.

(CNN)Turkey’s nightmare is coming true.

Not only is the battle for Aleppo sending tens of thousands of desperate people fleeing toward Turkey, but the fall of the rebel-held city would deliver a major blow to Ankara’s Syria policy.

Syrian government forces, backed by Russian air power, have cut off the last major supply route to rebels in Aleppo. The route, known as the Azaz corridor, links rebel-held eastern Aleppo with Turkey.

If the corridor falls, the rebels could lose Aleppo — and the entire Turkey-Syria border could fall under the control of forces that Ankara hates: the forces of President Bashar al-Assad‘s Russian-backed regime, and the Kurds.

Gönül Tol

Russian involvement has altered the course of the Syrian civil war for Turkey. Just a few months before Russia entered the war, Turkey and the United States had agreed on the outlines of a de facto “safe zone” along the Turkey-Syria border.

The deal was expected to significantly increase the scope of the U.S.-led air war against ISIS in northern Syria.

The agreement aimed to drive the so-called Islamic State out of a 68-mile-long area west of the Euphrates River and reaching into the province of Aleppo.

Ankara hoped that with the deal, the Kurdish expansion in the north would stop, the Syrian opposition would gain ground and fully capture Aleppo, and the Assad regime would be weakened. Turkey even reportedly trained a militia that would be tasked with policing the safe zone.

Putin upsets plans

Russian involvement, however, upended Ankara’s expectations.

A no-fly zone became very risky after Russia deployed S-400 missiles in Syria.

Complicating matters further has been Ankara’s shooting down of a Russian jet when it violated Turkish airspace in November. After the incident, Moscow directed its firepower on Turkey-backed rebels, including the Turkmens, who are an ethnic minority of Turkish descent and have emerged as Ankara’s favored proxy force, across Idlib and Aleppo.

Russian air power has helped Syrian government forces cut off the last major supply route to rebels in Aleppo.

Moscow ramped up air operations near the Turkish border, forcing Turkey and the United States to suspend aerial operations in northern Syria.

Moscow also courted Syria’s Kurds. In December, Russia delivered weapons to the 5,000 Kurdish fighters in Afrin, between Aleppo and the Turkish border.

And Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to help the Kurds consolidate their territorial gains in northern Syria by linking the Kurdish-held town of Kobane with Afrin.

Russian cooperation with the Syrian Kurdish group Democratic Union Party, or PYD, came against the backdrop of a close partnership between the PYD and the U.S. in Syria.

U.S. support for the Kurds in its fight against ISIS has heightened Turkey’s fears of an autonomous Kurdish region along its southern border and escalated the tension between Ankara and Washington.

Turkey recently summoned the U.S. ambassador to express its displeasure after a State Department spokesman said Washington did not regard the PYD as a terrorist organization.

Turkish military intervention?

For now, the rebel supply lines to Aleppo are open, since the border crossing at Bab al-Hawa is still under the control of Turkey-backed forces, but that might not last long.

Inside look at Russia's military operation in Syria

Inside look at Russia’s military operation in Syria 02:42

If regime forces capture the area west of Aleppo, Turkey will find itself cut off from the rebels it backs inside Syria.

Tens of thousands of Syrians are currently massed at the Turkish border fleeing regime’s Aleppo offensive.

Already shouldering the burden of over 2 million refugees, Turkey fears the fall of Aleppo will send many more fleeing toward the border.

Turkey’s worst-case scenario might unfold if the Kurds seize the opportunity to carve themselves an autonomous region stretching from the Iraqi border to Afrin in the west.

Some have suggested that such a scenario would spur a Turkish military intervention in Syria.

Tempting as it may be for President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who recently hinted at the idea, a unilateral or a joint Saudi-Turkish military action in Syria is highly unlikely.

It is politically and militarily too risky.

The Turkish military is fiercely opposed to intervention without international legitimacy and U.S. backing.

Playing on Europe’s fears

With Moscow-Ankara tensions at all-time high and Russian air operations in northern Syria, the military leadership does not want to provoke a military confrontation with Russia.

A Turkish army operation to evacuate troops guarding a historic tomb last year revealed an uncomfortable reality for Turkish military: Any operation inside Syria required cooperation with the opposition and the Kurds.

Reportedly, Turkish forces in armored vehicles were able to enter northern Syria through a corridor opened by the Kurdish forces. The military is reluctant to put itself in a similar situation again.

Intervention is politically risky as well. At a time when the government’s Syria policy is highly unpopular and Erdogan is preparing to ask voters to approve his dream of switching to a presidential system, intervention in Syria is likely to spur a negative public reaction.

Erdogan last week hinted that Turkey could take part in a U.S.-led military operation in Syria.

But given the Obama administration’s cautious approach so far, such an operation does not seem to be on the horizon.

Turkey’s best bet could be stepping up its support for the opposition and pushing for a no-fly-zone inside Syria.

Turkey has been hedging its bet on the European Union by playing to Europe’s fear of a new wave of Syrian refugees.

Ankara recently renewed its bid for a no-fly zone, arguing that such a zone would be the most effective way to stem the flow of refugees.

The EU, and most notably German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who bears much of the burden with increasing numbers of refugees, may support the idea. But Ankara’s demand is likely to fall on deaf ears in a risk-averse Washington.

Turkey has so far refused to recalibrate its Syria policy, but the facts on the ground might soon leave Turkey without any other options. The Aleppo offensive signals that scenario might not be too far off.

Kerry Desperate for Immediate Ceasefire, To End Devastating Aleppo Offensive

[ Russia Proposes March 1 Ceasefire in Syria; US Wants It Now ]

Moscow presented new ‘concrete’ plan to US to end Syria crisis: Lavrov

daily sabah

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov talks during a press conference with his UAE counterpart Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Tuesday, Feb. 2, 2016. (AP Photo) Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov talks during a press conference with his UAE counterpart Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Tuesday, Feb. 2, 2016. (AP Photo)

Russia’s foreign minister Sergey Lavrov said in an interview with the daily Moskovsky Komsomolets published Tuesday that Moscow had presented Washington with new proposals that are ‘concrete’, specific and simple, to end Syria’s civil war, but did not provide further details.

Lavrov stated in the interview that the plan did not involve Assad’s ouster and that Washington was studying the proposal. He added that he expected to hear from the U.S. very soon.

Lavrov also shrugged off criticism that Russia had contributed to the collapse of peace talks in Geneva last week by providing air cover for a Syrian regime advance north of Aleppo.

Lavrov will meet with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Thursday in Munich.

Russian activities in Syria are making it difficult to hold peace talks on ending the Syrian conflict, Secretary of State John Kerry said earlier on Tuesday, calling on Moscow to join efforts to bring about an immediate ceasefire.

“Russia’s activities from Aleppo and in the region are making it much more difficult to be able to come to the table and be able to have a serious conversation,” Kerry told reporters.

The U.S.’ stance on the issue has been quite direct; many times reiterating that neither the U.S. nor its allies in the anti-Daesh coalition will accept a solution with Assad. Within the same lines, U.S. State Dept. spokesman John Kirby had said Monday: “Unless we can get to a ceasefire that everybody has signed up to, and humanitarian access to the areas everybody has agreed needs it, then the conflict will be prolonged.”

Talking to TASS news agency, Russia’s Ambassador to Syria Alexander Kinshchak also spoke on Russia’s stance on a possible solution.

“All the sides involved in the Syrian crisis became aware that there would be no quick fall of the regime of Bashar Assad. Many of those who earlier counted on the military solution have realized that now this will hardly happen,” the ambassador said.

The diplomat also said Syrian people were tired of the long-lasting crisis and wanted an end to violence and resume to their normal lives.

Stressing that Russia and Syria have similar approaches on what groups in Syria could be considered terrorists, the diplomat said that the two countries’ views coincide in many ways.

Last month, President Erdoğan had stated that Russia was not fighting Daesh and wanted to form ‘a boutique state in Syria’ for the Moscow ally Bashar Assad.

British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond had also said Feb. 3 that he believed President Vladimir Putin was worsening the Syrian civil war by bombing opponents of Daesh.

“Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond had told reporters while saying there was a limit to how long Russia could pose as a promoter of the peace process while bombing Assad’s opponents, who the West hopes can shape Syria once the president is gone.

Russia is a close ally of Syria’s Bashar Assad and has been waging an air campaign on its behalf since Sept. 30.

Petition To Charge Barack Obama for War Crimes At the Hague

WE THE PEOPLE white house

we petition the obama administration to:

We demand conviction of the USA president Barack Obama and trial in the International Criminal Court in Hague.

We demand conviction of a war criminal Barack Obama and trial in the International Criminal Court in Hague. He is guilty of crimes not only against the USA citizens, but against the whole world.

One of the most dreadful prisons in history – Guantanamo – continues to function. Libya was destroyed as a result of Obama’s aggression. In Syria, Obama’s agents train, fund and organize terrorist groups, deceitfully naming them “moderate opposition”, who, among other things, bear a relation to Al-Qaeda, implicated in crimes against the American people. Secret services collect the Americans’ personal data information on a 24 hour basis under the canopy battling terrorism, using electronic surveillance tools on political undesirables, effectively stomping on the Americans’ right for privacy.

 

Total signatures on this petition—4,586
Signatures needed by March 09, 2016 to reach goal of 100,000—95,414