EPA clears way for burning 16 million pounds of explosives

“approximately 125,000 pounds of smokeless powder exploded…Explo has filed bankruptcy without providing for the monitoring, removal, or disposal of approximately 18 million pounds of M6 propellant and other explosives”–Louisiana Emergency Executive PROCLAMATION NO. 129 BJ 2013
June 20, 2013, Report from the Army Explosive Safety Board cited concerns about the long term stability and safety of the explosive materials in the magazine and recommended open burn/open detonation (OB/OD) of the materials within two years.
August 1, 2013…DoD representative indicated the likelihood of a magazine
explosion increases within the next 2-10 years due to instability.

“The preponderance of evidence indicates that the probability of an explosives directly related to the long-term storage of M6 propellant at Minden is likely.”–STATE OF LOUISIANA
[It is still not clear whether it was the M6 propellant which exploded, or the recycled explosives.]
TIMES-PICAYUNE
camp-minden-explo-site-19b1ad1f3f7fce71M6 artillery propellant, in white packages, stored at Louisiana National Guard’s Camp Minden. The Environmental Protection Agency on Friday (May 8, 2015) announced it would not disapprove of the Louisiana Military Department’s hiring of a company to dispose of the material through a closed burning process. (EPA) (EPA)

The federal Environmental Protection Agency cleared the way Friday (May 8) for the Louisiana Military Department to hire a contractor to dispose of 16 million pounds of dangerous artillery propellants and explosives at the National Guard’s Camp Minden through a “contained burn” method that will collect potentially toxic air pollution.

The EPA told state officials it would not exercise its right to disapprove of the contractor chosen to dispose of the material, clearing the way for the state and contractor to complete other permitting requirements.

The contained burn method will allow the materials to be burned inside a structure, with any pollutants collected and treated before being released. The state’s selection of Explosive Service International followed a months-long process to review alternative methods of disposing of the unstable propellants and explosives after residents, local and state officials opposed an earlier plan by the EPA and the Louisiana National Guard to dispose of them through open burning at Camp Minden.

The selection of the controlled burn method was criticized by Louisiana Progress Action, which participated in a community dialog set up by EPA and the state to discuss alternative disposal methods. The organization wants the material disposed of in “supercritical water oxidation” units, and said it has serious concerns the selected method will not reduce pollutants to levels agreed to by the dialog committee.

“While incineration is safer than an open burn, there is no reason why the U.S. Army should refuse to honor its public commitment to let Camp Minden have the safest solution,” the organization said in a news release. “Taxpayers funded the military’s extensive research on supercritical water oxidation, purchased the SCWO unit, and are currently paying for it to sit in storage not being used.

The group said the oxidation method could allow destruction of the material to begin within a few months, while it could take up to a year for the selected burn method to begin.

U.S. Army experts warned in March that condensation had covered many of the propellant and explosive containers, speeding their degradation and increasing the danger of a catastrophic explosion.

The explosives were abandoned at the base by Explo Systems Inc., which went bankrupt in 2013. In October 2012, an explosion in one of the bunkers the company leased at Camp Minden led to a Louisiana State Police investigation that discovered the millions of pounds of propellant still on the site.

Disposal of the dangerous material will cost $28 million, retired Brig. Gen. Owen Monconduit, who is deputy director of contracting and purchasing for the Military Department, said in an April 14 letter to the EPA recommending the hiring of Explosive Service International. The Baton Rouge company was one of 10 that submitted bids for the project.

According to exhibits submitted with the letter, the company’s thermal treatment process can dispose of propellant and explosives in their existing packaging, and the system has been permitted for operation in other states.

“Contained burn technology can be thought of as ‘open burning indoors,'” said an explanation submitted by the company with its bid. “Materials are prepared and ignited similar to traditional open burning operations but the exhaust gasses are completely contained and cleaned prior to release. The design of the pollution control system to scrub off the gases is tailored to the chemistry of the materials being treated.”

The method would be used to dispose of 15,687,247 pounds of M6 artillery propellant and 320,890 pounds of Clean Burning Igniter, at a rate of about 63,000 pounds per day, according to the Military Department letter.

EPA and state officials have not said when the work might begin.

Russian Tanks On the White House

‘Russian Tanks In Washington’ Video Triggers U.S. Secret Service Probe

RADIO FREE EUROPE

WASHINGTON – Did pro-Kremlin activists beam images of Russian tanks onto the facade of the White House to protest what they call Washington’s efforts to prevent foreign leaders from traveling to Moscow to commemorate the defeat of Nazi Germany?

A YouTube video of this purported light show has notched hundreds of thousands of views after it was uploaded this week by a nationalist-oriented Russian film group, which has claimed credit for the prank.

It’s unclear from the video itself whether the alleged prank is merely a ruse or whether the activists actually pulled off the stunt.

But the U.S. Secret Service, the federal agency tasked with protecting the president, is now investigating the authenticity of the footage.

“The Secret Service is aware of this alleged incident. Appropriate follow-up is being conducted at this time,” Nicole Mainor, a spokeswoman for agency, told RFE/RL in an emailed comment.

The video was uploaded to YouTube on May 6 by a film production group called Set, or “Network,” and had garnered more than 750,000 views on the site as of May 8.

It is prefaced with a text stating that U.S. President Barack Obama “has forbidden many world leaders” from visiting Moscow for the city’s Victory Day parade on May 9 — a clear reference to the fact that Western heads of state are skipping Russia’s commemorations of the defeat of Nazi Germany in light of the Kremlin’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea peninsula last year and its backing for pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine.

“If Barack doesn’t go to Moscow[‘s] Victory Day Parade, the Parade will go to Barack!” the text accompanying the video reads.

With a soundtrack comprising one of the most famous Russian patriotic military marches, Farewell Of Slavyanka, the video proceeds to show footage of tanks and missiles parading across Red Square being beamed onto the face of the White House as bystanders mill about and film the spectacle with their smart phones.

The Russian website TJ Journal reports that the film group was founded by alumni of the pro-Kremlin youth group Nashi, which gained notoriety for its anti-Western stunts and for hounding foreign diplomats and Russian opposition activists.

The YouTube video also provides a link to a website for a Russian patriotic film festival using a URL titled “vezhliviye tanky,” or “polite tanks.”

The title is an apparent reference to the phrase “polite people,” a term used in Russia to refer to armed men who entered Crimea in February 2014 and seized government buildings, paving the way for the Kremlin’s annexation of the peninsula. Russian President Vladimir Putin later admitted that the men were Russian troops.

TJ Journal notes that a member of the film festival’s jury, Yury Degtyaryov, is linked to a March prank in which a light show was projected onto the facade of the U.S. embassy in Moscow.

Anastasia Melnik, a spokeswoman for the film group behind the alleged White House light show, neither confirmed nor denied the authenticity of the stunt portrayed in the video.

Contacted by RFE/RL on May 8, she directed inquiries to a statement on the group’s website noting that “the video was shot in May of this year.”

— Carl Schreck

Smarmy US Diplomat Tries To Strongarm Greece Into Abandoning “Turkish Stream”

https://i0.wp.com/www.jsg.utexas.edu/lacp/files/Amos-Hochstein.jpg
Amos J Hochstein,  Board Member Mechon Hadar

US urges Greece to reject Turkish Stream, focus on Western-backed project

Russia-Today
Amos J. Hochstein (L) , Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs poses for a photograph along with Greek minister of Foreign Affairs, Nikos Kotzias during their meeting in Athens on May 8, 2015. (AFP Photo/Louisa Gouliamaki)

Amos J. Hochstein (L) , Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs poses for a photograph along with Greek minister of Foreign Affairs, Nikos Kotzias during their meeting in Athens on May 8, 2015. (AFP Photo/Louisa Gouliamaki)

Washington is pushing Athens not to abandon a Western-backed Trans-Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) project in favor of the Russia-proposed Turkish Stream, a pipeline that would bring Russian gas to Europe via Greece.

Greece should consider joining the TAP, which will link Europe to natural gas supplies from Azerbaijan via Turkey, Greece, Albania and the Adriatic Sea, top US energy diplomat Amos Hochstein said after talks with Greek officials, Reuters reported on Friday.

“Turkish Stream doesn’t exist. There is no consortium to build it, there is no agreement to build it. So let’s put that to the side, and wait until there’s some movement on that and see if that’s relevant or not relevant and in the meantime focus on what’s important – the pipeline we already agreed to, that Greece already agreed to”, Hochstein claimed. He didn’t give any details on the meeting with Greek officials, saying that they “more agreed than disagreed.”

Greek Energy Minister Panagiotis Lafazanis, however, responded that the country would continue supporting the Russian gas pipeline.

“We are backing this project because we think it will be useful for our country,” the minister said in a statement after the talks.

The US envoy said that the US position was the best way for Europe to secure its energy supply is by diversifying its sources and ensuring competition. He also added that having other gas sources would “help with price, reliability of supply, and that will help take the political element out of the supply system.”

Meanwhile, on Thursday Russian President Vladimir Putin reportedly told Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras during a phone conversation that Russia was ready to consider providing financial support for Greek companies that join the Russian pipeline project. Tsipras confirmed his country’s readiness to participate in the Turkish Stream project.

Earlier in April during the Greek PM’s official visit to Moscow, Putin and Tsipras agreed to collaborate in the construction of a new pipeline (http://rt.com/business/247973-turkish-stream-greece-hub/ ), to be part of the Turkish Stream project, which would deliver Russian gas to Europe via Greece. The Russian president said at that time that by joining the project Greece could become one of the main power distribution centers in Europe, and earn hundreds of millions of euros annually from gas transit fees. The Greek PM voiced interest in the proposal, claiming that the project could be a way to boost jobs and investment in the Greek economy. Cash-stripped Greece can also use revenues from potential joint projects with Russia to pay off debt to international creditors.

READ MORE: EU slashes growth outlook for Greece, blames high uncertainty

In December, Gazprom’s CEO Aleksey Miller announced a plan to construct the Turkish Stream pipeline, replacing the South Stream project. Russia was forced to withdraw from South Stream due to EU objections over its construction. South Stream was supposed to connect pipelines running under the Black Sea to a network in Eastern Europe, with Bulgaria as the entry point.

The Turkish Stream pipeline will have an annual capacity of 63 billion cubic meters. Around 14 billion cubic meters of gas are to be supplied to Turkey, with the rest being pumped to a hub on the Turkish-Greek border for customers in Europe.