Obama Hammers ISIS Leadership–Baghdadi May Be Dead, #2 Abu Alaa al-Afri Is Dead

Baghdadi suffered spinal injury
Refuting earlier report of death of Islamic State (ISIS) chief Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, a new media report has claimed that he suffered spinal injury.  ISIS which has captured large swathes and Iraq and Syria is currently functioning under the leadership of former Al-Qaeda veteran Abu Alaa al-Afri.
Baghdadi suffered spinal injury Baghdadi suffered spinal injuries in air strikes in Nineveh, Iraq in March. According to media reports, he is being treated in Mosul which was captured by ISIS in June 2014. Mosul is the second largest city of the Iraq.
However, the exact condition of al-Baghdadi’s health is yet to be verified. Following the March air-strike in question, the Pentagon denied knowing that al-Baghdadi was present in the area targeted. Last month, the Radio Iran has claimed that ISIS chief Baghdadi, who was reportedly injured in bombing, has now been killed. However, the news of his death could not be verified.  A bounty worth $10 million has been imposed by the US on the al-Baghdadi’s head.
Despite a spate of coalition strikes on ISIS in Iraq and Syria since August last year, the extremists continue to advance and unleash bloodshed and terror. The US-led coalition has launched more than 1,000 air strikes against ISIS targets in Iraq since the campaign began on 8 August, 2014. OneIndia News

EU Plans To Streamline Illegal Immigration Operations–Increasing Rescues and Repatriations

European Agenda on Migration--(FULL MEMO)

EC LINK

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
A EUROPEAN AGENDA ON MIGRATION

Dispute over EU quota: British Minister wants to send back refugee boats

“Streit über EU-Quote: Britische Ministerin will Flüchtlingsboote zurückschicken”

der spiegel

HANDOUT - Eine Aufnahme vom 04.10.2014 zeigt 105 Fl¸chtlinge, die in einem Schlauchboot vor der italienische Insel Lampedusa darauf warten, ab Bord der ´Phoenixª des einzige Schiffes der Fl¸chtlings-Rettungsstation auf See, gebracht zu werden. Die Migrant Offshore Aid Station (MOAS) ist von der Itlienerin Regina Catrambone und ihrem amerikanischem Ehemann Christopher als nach eigenen Angaben Europas erste privat finanzierte Fl¸chtlingshilfe zur See gegr¸ndet worden. Das seit mehreren Jahren auf Malta lebende Unternehmerpaar hat im vergangenen Jahr etwa 3000 Fl¸chtlinge vor dem Ertrinken im Mittelmeer gerettet. Foto: Darrin Zammit Lupi/MOAS.EU/dpa (ACHTUNG: Nur zur redaktionellen Verwendung und nur bei Nennung der Quelle "Darrin Zammit Lupi/MOAS.EU/dpa") (zu dpa "Maltas kleine Fl¸chtlingshilfe rettet Migranten mit nur einemâ Schiff" am 02.05.2015) (MALTAâ OUT; MLTOUT; NO ACCESS MALTA) +++(c) dpa - Bildfunk+++

The EU states argue over a quota for the distribution of refugees, soon to be presented to a solution. However, the British Home Secretary May has other plans: They want to force boats to turn back.

The EU Commission will present its strategy for dealing with refugees on Wednesday noon. Not everywhere encounter the plans that were previously known to enthusiasm. The British Home Secretary wrote about in the newspaper “The Times” on their own terms: Theresa May said in the commentary in favor of send back refugee boats in the Mediterranean.

Instead take more immigrants and to organize the distribution of the new countries, the EU should rather seek “to create safe landing sites in North Africa,” said May. For this they called for an “active recycling program”. The introduction of mandatory quotas for the EU states rejected May. This will only “encourage more people to put their lives at risk”.

Despite the more rigorous monitoring of the EU’s external borders in southern Europe, according to a study of thousands of boat people drowned. This is clear from the first database to dead migrants in the Mediterranean. Most of the victims are never found. From 1990 to 2013 3188 deaths were registered. Only in the recent shipping disaster in April, however, around 800 people died.

Relief for Greece and Italy

For weeks, the Government of the EU Member States now seek a common solution to the crisis in the Mediterranean. On Wednesday, the foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini and the Commissioner for Migration and Home Affairs, Dimitris Avramopoulos, now propose plans for four areas: the common asylum policy, the fight against traffickers and illegal migration, new ways for legal migration and the EU’s external borders.

The planned quota system for the EU states receiving countries like Italy and Greece could be relieved. Criteria for the distribution of asylum seekers should be, among other things, economic output, population and the unemployment rate. Great Britain, Ireland and Denmark reject those odds but.

“Heiterer afternoon fun”

Especially disparagingly remarked Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán: The flight to Europe was for many a pleasure trip, a “cheerful afternoon fun”. The convergence of Hungarian society did not stand a chance if “we a kind of dormitory Party” announce, in which each come and could stay – and then ‘until the wee hours “celebrate, quotes him the” Süddeutsche Zeitung “.

“The individual governments know best what they can afford in joint solidarity”, also said the Czech Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka. His Government had agreed voluntarily to accept 70 refugees from Syria. Czech Republic granted mainly Ukrainians refuge. “Not only in Southern Europe, also in the east one is faced with a difficult situation,” said Sobotka.

It was clear “that this is not overnight to full approval encounters”, Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere said with regard to the quota system. It favor the project, even if this does not necessarily mean fewer refugees would come to Germany. However, it is unacceptable that there are currently only five European countries – including Germany – would take three quarters of all refugees, the CDU politician said.

Proposals from the European Commission can only be law if the EU countries agree. After the recent Dublin procedures asylum seekers to remain in the country in which they first set foot in the Union. In the overtaxed countries Italy or Greece refugees dive under and often travel to Germany or Sweden on. There their asylum applications have common success.

Summary: The European Union on Wednesday in front of the plans for a system of quotas for the distribution of refugees to the country. By contrast, the British Home Secretary proposes an “active recycling program” in front of the boats to be sent back on the high seas. Criticism also comes from Hungary and the Czech Republic.

VEK / dpa / AFP

The Evil within—The truth we dare not see about Saudi Arabia

The Evil within: The truth we dare not see about Saudi Arabia’s war in Yemen

Russia-Today
An air strike hits a military site controlled by the Houthi group in Yemen's capital Sanaa May 12, 2015. (Reuters / Khaled Abdullah)

An air strike hits a military site controlled by the Houthi group in Yemen’s capital Sanaa May 12, 2015. (Reuters / Khaled Abdullah)

On the 70th anniversary of the fall of Nazi Germany, fascism is far from dead. As Yemen bleeds under Saudi Arabia’s grand war, it is really the annihilation of one people we are seeing play out – the Zaidis of Yemen.

If Saudi Arabia, a regional super-power strong with its trillions of petrodollars, has ruled unchallenged over the Middle East and to an extent over the Islamic world, it has done so at the expense of people’s freedom and prosperity. Yemen, more than any other country in the region has suffered under its powerful and rich tyrant of a neighbor.

Coerced into assuming the role of a passive vassal, Yemen was prevented from rising to its true potential through a clever network of bribery, religious sponsoring and social engineering. Ever since this poorest nation of South Arabia attempted to break away from the shackles of tyranny back in 1962, Riyadh has preyed on Yemen, sabotaging and manipulating, invading its lands and eroding its institutions, all to the tune of a disruptive and perverse game of tribalism with sectarian undertones.

The overlord of Arabia, the Kingdom is responsible for much, if not all of the unrest we have seen play out in the region.

But back to Yemen!

Yemen has always been a thorn in Al Saud’s thigh, a threat to its hegemonic ambitions.

As professed by Ibn Saud (the patriarch of the house of Saud) all those decades ago – left unchecked Yemen would spell the end of Saudi Arabia as the region’s hegemon. One might argue that this one warning actually shaped Riyadh’s policy towards Yemen, feeding its paranoia over this most unruly and now poorest nation in the peninsula.

Ravaged by pandemic corruption, insecurity, political instability, social injustices and an over-bearing, ever-spreading sense of despair, Yemen has become but a shell of its former self, an institutional husk with no social cohesion left to hold it together.

But if Yemen has become what it is today, it is by Saudi design. Yemen’s demise, its very unraveling has been engineered by Saudi Arabia ever since 1994 when then-King Fahd bin Abdulaziz propped a loose coalition of tribes and Sunni radical factions to act as a counter-power to then-President Ali Abdullah Saleh, in exchange for military back up against Al Hirak – the Southern Secessionist Movement. For the sake of territorial unity President Saleh delivered Yemen’s future to the rapacious hands of the Kingdom, not realizing just how much this alliance would cost him in the end.

And so Al Islah – which acts as an umbrella for the now infamous Muslim Brotherhood – was born to act as Riyadh’s proxy in Sana’a.

This one party would serve as a catalyst, a protective shield and a nurturing hand for Wahhabis and Salafis alike, which religious movements we know now have inspired terror groups such as Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

But if Saudi Arabia has played a role in the crumbling of Yemen from afar, a dark cloud above the once clear sky of Felix Arabia, March 25, 2015 shattered whatever restraint Riyadh could master. Faced with an increasingly politically independent Yemen, Riyadh chose to intervene before the Houthis could actually manifest a grand political and tribal coalition and fulfill Yemenis’ calls for fairer political representation.

At the risk of upsetting the Western media narrative and Saudi Arabia’ self-proclaimed intentions in Yemen, democracy and constitutional legitimacy were never part of Riyadh’s equation, more worldly ambitions have animated Al Saud royals: natural resources and geopolitics figuring high on the list.

But that is not all – ideology, rather, clashing religious ideology has played a trigger to this Saudi-led war against Yemen, and there lies an evil which the world has yet to wake up to.

More than a month into this unilateral and grand military intervention on Yemen and it appears clear that Saudi Arabia has singled out not just the Houthis as its target of choice but the entire Yemeni Zaidi community.

Because of their rejection of Wahhabism, the Yemen Zaidi community has been labeled as “apostate” by all Salafi and Wahhabi clerics; a religious aberration to be dealt with by annihilation. Back in 2009 during a live TV interview with BBC Arabic, Adel Al Kalbani, the Imam of Mecca professed his hatred of all Shia Muslims when he called for their hunting down and death. More recently, in April 2013, Saad Al Durihim, a Saudi cleric, posted a series of comments on Twitter in which he advocated that militias in Iraq demonstrate a more “heavy handed” approach when dealing with Shia Muslims and kill any Shias they might encounter – women, men and children. Such statements are the expression of Saudi Arabia’s strict theocratic reactionary regime.

It needs to be pointed out that Saudi Arabia’s official line vis-a-vis Shia Islam echoes that of both Al- Qaeda and ISIS, which groups, Stephen Lendman, a prominent US political analyst and writer has said are but the offshoots of the Kingdom’s religious fascist construct.

But if Saudi Arabia’s religious “policy” has failed to raise even an eyebrow in Western capitals, it has become increasingly difficult to ignore the ongoing cultural and religious genocide which is taking place in Yemen.

For weeks now Saudi Arabia has pounded Sa’ada and several neighboring regions, oblivious to civilians’ safety in its desire to lay flat Zaidi Islam.

One might argue that Riyadh is actually specifically targeting civilians. Why else would the Kingdom have resorted to using cluster bombs in heavily populated areas, especially when studies have established that such weapons stand a lethal threat to civilians? According to handicap international 27 percent of all recorded cluster bombs victims are children.

Activists in Yemen, among which Hussain Al Bukhaiti, have also accused Riyadh of using chemical agents such as chlorine and white phosphorus in Sa’ada, Haja and even the capital Sana’a.

Following an attack on Saudi soil by the Houthis earlier last week, Saudi coalition spokesman Brig-Gen Ahmed Al Asiri warned Riyadh’s revenge would be swift and radical. And indeed it was – hundreds of thousands of civilians were put in harm’s way, trapped in Sa’ada, under relentless bombing. For 24 hours Saudi Arabia would rain bombs on this one “Zaidi” region of Yemen, unchallenged and unquestioned, cloaked by Western powers’ deafening silence.

But if civilian casualties are often the first victims of war what about cultural genocide? How can any nation ever justify the destruction of historical and religious landmarks? On May 8, Saudi Arabia reduced late Sheikh Hussein Badreddin Al Houthi’s shrine to rubble. A few days after that, another sacred Yemeni monument was destroyed – Al Hadi Mosque, the third mosque to have been built in Yemen over a thousand years ago. If not hate what could justify such actions?

If the world came together to decry ISIS’ rampage against Iraq and Syria heritage, why stay silent over Saudi Arabia’s crimes? Or is it that money white-washes war crimes these days?

On the 70th anniversary of the fall of fascism the US and the EU might want to open their eyes to their allies’ intrinsic nature.

Catherine Shakdam for RT.

Catherine Shakdam is a political analyst and commentator for the Middle East with a special emphasis on Yemen and radical movements.

A consultant with Anderson Consulting and leading analyst for the Beirut Center for Middle East Studies, her writings have appeared in MintPress, Foreign Policy Journal, Open-Democracy, the Guardian, the Middle East Monitor, Middle East Eye and many others.In 2015 her research and analysis on Yemen was used by the UN Security Council in a situation report.