Developing nations reject US-led climate deal

Developing nations reject US-led climate deal

REUTERS

Developing nations rejected on Saturday a climate deal worked out by US President Barack Obama and four major emerging

economies, saying it could not become a UN blueprint for fighting global warming. ( Watch Video )
Earlier, European Union nations reluctantly agreed to sign up for the accord worked out at a summit of 120 leaders by the United States, China, India, South Africa and Brazil — meant as the first UN climate pact since the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. "I regret to inform you that Tuvalu cannot accept this document," said Ian Fry, delegate for the low-lying Pacific island state that fears it could be wiped off the map by rising sea levels.
At an extra night session in Copenhagen after most leaders left, he said that a goal in the document for limiting global warming to a maximum rise of 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial times was too lax and would spell "the end for Tuvalu".
Delegates of Venezuela, Bolivia, Cuba and Nicaragua also angrily denounced the "Copenhagen Accord", saying it would not help address global warming and was unfairly worked out behind closed doors at the December 7-18 conference.
For any deal to become a UN pact it would need to be adopted unanimously at the 193 nation talks. If some nations are opposed, the deal would be adopted only by its supporters — currently a group of major nations representing more than half the world’s greenhouse gas emissions.
Even backers of the accord conceded it was imperfect and fell far short of UN ambitions for the Copenhagen talks, meant as a turning point to push the world economy towards renewable energy and away from fossil fuels.
Before leaving, Obama said the deal, which holds out the prospect of an annual $100 billion in aid for developing nations by 2020, was a starting point for world efforts to slow climate change.
"This progress did not come easily and we know this progress alone is not enough," he said after talks with China’s Premier Wen Jiabao and leaders of India, South Africa and Brazil. "We’ve come a long way but we have much further to go," he said of the deal, meant to prevent more heatwaves, floods, wildfires, mudslides and rising ocean levels.
"The meeting has had a positive result, everyone should be happy," said Xie Zhenhua, head of China’s climate delegation. European nations were lukewarm. "The decision has been very difficult for me. We have done one step, we have hoped for several more," said German Chancellor Angela Merkel. She had hoped that all nations would promise deeper cuts in emissions, mainly from burning fossil fuels, during the Copenhagen summit.
A goal mentioned in some draft texts of halving world greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, for instance, was dropped. "I came here to Copenhagen wanting the most ambitious deal possible. We have made a start. I believe that what we need to follow up on quickly is ensuring a legally binding outcome," said British Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
"This is not a perfect agreement. It will not solve the climate threat to mankind," said Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt, whose country holds the rotating EU presidency.
Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd called the deal "a significant agreement on climate change action. It is the first global agreement on climate change action between rich nations and poor countries." But he added "these negotiations have been exceptionally tough. The attitude taken by various countries in these negotiations has been particularly hardline."
Many European nations had wanted Obama to offer deeper cuts in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020. But Obama was unable to, partly because carbon capping legislation is stalled in the US Senate.
Washington backed a plan to raise $100 billion in aid for poor nations from 2020. The deal sets an end-January 2010 deadline for all nations to submit plans for curbs on emissions to the United Nations.
A separate text proposes an end-2010 deadline for transforming the non-binding pledges into a legally binding treaty. Some environmental groups were also scathing. "The city of Copenhagen is a crime scene tonight, with the guilty men and women fleeing to the airport," said John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace UK.
Tensions between China and the United States, the world’s two biggest emitters, had been particularly acute after Obama — in a message directed at the Chinese — said any deal to cut emissions would be "empty words on a page" unless it was transparent and accountable.

Ulema, Mushaikh declare suicide attacks un-Islamic

Ulema, Mushaikh declare suicide attacks un-Islamic

Minister for Religions Affairs Allama Hamid Saeed Kazmi said that the conference was arranged with an aim to devise a strategy against terrorism. -File Photo

ISLAMABAD: Ulema and Mushaikh belonging to different schools of thought on Thursday unanimously declared suicide attacks in the country un-Islamic and forbidden in Islam.

A large number of Ulema and Mushaikh who attend the ‘Ulema Mushaikh Conference’ arranged by the Ministry of Religious Affair at National Librarydenounced the killing of innocent people in the name of religion.
They, in particular spoke against suicide attacks. Interior Minister Rehman Malik and Minister for Religious Affairs Allama Hamid Saeed Kazmi and Ulema Mushaikh from across the country participated in the conference.

The interior minister also briefed the Ulema and Mushaikh about the security situation as well as measures taken by the government for curbing the menace of terrorism.

The Ulema said that it is clearly stated in the Holy Quran that killing of innocent people is un-Islamic and it could not be justified in any way.

They said ‘The shariah introduced by Hazrat Muhammad (SAW), is complete and adequate for us and we do not need any thing more.’

Speaking on the occasion, Minister for Religions Affairs Allama Hamid Saeed Kazmi said that the conference was arranged with an aim to devise a strategy against terrorism.

He said those who launched attacks upon mosques and educational institutions could never be called Muslims. He said Islam does not allow anyone to kill innocent people or attack mosques.

‘While those laying down their lives in the fight against terrorism are martyrs as they are fighting to save the motherland,’ he said.

The minister said no one in the country could declare suicide attacks as correct. He urged people to join hands with the government against terrorists.

He added that all the demands of the ulema and Mushaikh have been included in the resolution adopted by the conference.

Hamid Kazmi said before launching the military operation in Waziristan all options were used to solve the issue through peaceful way.

‘The whole nation witnessed that the government wanted to solve the issue through dialogue and it only opted to use power when the militants started challenging the writ of the government,’ he said.

He said there would be no dialogue with the militants unless they surrender. He urged the nation to display unity and work for the progress and prosperity of the country.

He said Islam is a religion of peace, harmony and tolerance and dose not allow to spread hatred.

Prominent religious scholar, Syed Charaghuddin Shah said that Ulema believe that the people who are committing terrorists actives have no link with Islam.

He said the conspiracies of enemies to de-stabilize Pakistan would never succeed.

Naib Ameer Ahl-e-Hadith Zabir Muhammad Zaheer said that the enemies of Islam would not succeed to achieve their evil motives. He said that those wanting to de-stabilize the country would themselves be destroyed.

Speaking on the occasion a representative of Hamid Musvi said that the terrorists who are killing innocent people are the enemies of humanity and Islam.

He also quoted the Holy Quran and proved that killing of innocent people was not allowed in Islam. -APP

The Difference Between ISLAM and “Radical Islam”

Ulema’s stand

Dawn Editorial
It is also interesting to note that while both the JUI and JI have separately condemned suicide bombings — with some qualifiers thrown in to water down their statements — neither party has said outright that it is opposed to the Taliban. — Photo by AFP

Not many in Pakistan are in favour of militancy but our society as a whole is undeniably religious and conservative. Unlike the Taliban who wish to impose their views on others, most Pakistanis see religion as a matter of personal belief. But the strong undercurrent of faith that guides individual lives also gives religious leaders a great deal of clout. Believers rarely question their word because it comes from an ostensibly more knowledgeable authority. As such the imam of a mosque is in a position to shape public opinion on the neighbourhood level while religio-political leaders can influence what transpires on the national stage. The question here is: why aren’t the ulema of the country using the considerable means at their disposal to raise a united voice against the Taliban? Is there a possibility that they share some of the causes espoused by the militants?

Keep in mind that Thursday’s ulema conference, which deemed suicide attacks to be un-Islamic and also supported the ongoing military operation, was hosted by the government. It is bound to be seen as a state-sponsored event and as such lacks the authority that may be attached to a congregation of religious leaders who condemn terrorism without official prompting. Also take into account that the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam and Jamaat-i-Islami did not take part in the conference, for reasons that remain unclear. It is also interesting to note that while both the JUI and JI have separately condemned suicide bombings — with some qualifiers thrown in to water down their statements — neither party has said outright that it is opposed to the Taliban.

Why not? Do they have a problem with suicide attacks but not the Taliban? If so, they should have the courage to let the nation know where they stand, and for what reason. The ulema of this country have a role to play in the battle against the Taliban. Every Friday sermon, every statement by a religious leader, carries with it the potential to strengthen public resolve in what is going to be a long fight. Our religious leaders must make their positions known.

Troubling changes in Pakistan

Troubling changes in Pakistan

On Thursday morning as Pakistan’s Defence Minister was preparing to board a flight to China for an official visit, he was detained by Pakistani security officials and was told he had been barred from leaving the country. An altercation ensued, but the country’s top civilian defence official was told by the police and soldiers that they take orders from senior generals and judges, not government ministers.

Minister Ahmad Mukhtar was told by the security officials that they were acting on instructions from the National Accountability Bureau, an arm of Pakistan’s intelligence service created by former military ruler Pervez Musharraf to harass political opponents with corruption charges. The Defence Minister was told his name was on an ‘Exit Control List’ even though he has never been convicted of a crime. Clearly, Pakistan has entered a decisive stage. Imagine the U.S. Defence Secretary being detained by U.S. marshals at JFK airport or the RCMP telling Peter MacKay, he cannot leave the country.

What was bizarre about this development is that although it was Pakistani’s Interior Ministry that was supposed to have issued the orders, the Interior Minister himself was named as someone not allowed to travel abroad without special permission. Clearly the administration of the government in Islamabad has been taken over by plainclothes military intelligence officials.

A coup by any other name is still a coup. Or as Shakespeare would have said, What’s in a name? That which we call a rose, by any other name would smell as sweet

This new development follows Wednesday’s decision by the Pakistani Supreme Court to annul the country’s National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) which had been proclaimed by General Musharraf towards the end of his rule and which had resulted in the withdrawal of thousands of politically motivated criminal charges against the country’s politicians of all stripes, including current president Asif Zardari.

There is lot more to these machinations than meets the eye and the stakes are very high for Canada, the U.S. and the rest of the West. Although the generally pro-Taliban Pakistani media has defined the NRO debate as being about corruption, it is really about the military and intelligence services refusing to accept civilian control.

The end of the NRO should have meant that the cases withdrawn under it would be reinstated and each case would be decided on its merit in various lower courts. Given that most of the cases were never proved after being tried for ten years or so, this should have meant renewed prosecution and early decisions on acquittal or conviction. But the Pakistani judiciary is acting in concert with the anti-Zardari media and the military intelligence apparatus.

Instead of letting the cases return to court and be decided individually, an attempt is being made to create frenzy against the elected government that can result in its overthrow. Some Pakistani judges have consistently sided with anti-western Jihadis and share their hatred of Zardari and his pro-U.S. civilian disposition.

Yesterday, the New York Times reported that parts of the Pakistani military and intelligence services have launched a campaign to harass American diplomats in Islamabad. Its correspondents in Islamabad said the harassment campaign includes “frequent searches of American diplomatic vehicles in major cities” and the refusal by Pakistan’s officials to extend or approve visas for more than 100 American officials.

Pakistan’s ambassador to the U.S. shrugged off the visa delays on the large influx of U.S. diplomats coming to Islamabad, telling CNN they are “simply a matter of process and conformity of Pakistani rules and procedures.”

Hardly convincing considering the fact that the delay in visas has ensured the American helicopters used by Pakistan to fight militants can no longer be serviced because visas for 14 American mechanics have not been approved.

Payments to Pakistan of nearly $1 billion a year for counterterrorism have been suspended because the last of the American Embassy’s five accountants left the country this week after his visa expired. No helicopters in the air means good news for the Taliban. Clearly, someone senior in the Pakistan military and the ISI has the interest of the Taliban at heart and has their sights on their civilian boss, the Defence Minister, not to mention on President Asif Zardari.

The New York Times report said harassment of U.S. officials has grown so frequent that “they viewed it as a concerted effort by parts of the military and intelligence services that had grown resentful of American demands to step up the war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda.”

The Obama Administration it seems is working with its eyes wide shut. While it pours billions into the coffers of the Pakistan Army and its ISI, these are the very forces that are working for the Taliban and intend to accomplish their task by overthrowing or incapacitating the elected civilian government that has sworn to fight Al-Qaeda.

One would have expected the Obama administration to deal firmly with the Pakistan Army and the ISI, but it seems the State Department will once more fumble the ball and the people of Pakistan will be left with yet one more military (or military-backed) administration as the generals snuff out democracy, this time by pulling the strings of the judiciary.

If change in Pakistan is brought about by a faux constitutional process manipulated by the ISI or the army, it should be seen for what it really is: a pro-Taliban coup d’etat against a legitimately elected civilian government. The U.S. and its allies should oppose such change in Islamabad to ensure their success in the war against Al-Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

National Post

Tarek Fatah is a Toronto writer and broadcaster. He is the author of Chasing a Mirage: The Tragic Illusion of an Islamic State (Wiley 2008).

Childhood in ruins


Last December, Israel began a 23-day bombardment of Gaza, killing around 1,400 people. One year on, a generation of children is growing up amid the wreckage of that attack, traumatised – and radicalised – by the experience

Guardian foreign editor Harriet Sherwood
Thursday December 17 2009
The Guardian


[]

Ghiada abu Elaish’s fingers twist in her lap and her eyes cloud over as she recalls the day an Israeli shell killed four of her cousins and left her in a coma for 22 days. She has had almost 12 months to reflect on the tragedy, a time in which hatred and anger might have consumed the 13-year-old. Remarkably, though, not only has she survived shocking injuries and a dozen operations, with many more to come, but she has retained both her sweet nature and faith in a bright future.

Which makes it all the harder for her to return each day after school, dressed in the ubiquitous Palestinian uniform of blue-and-white-striped smock over jeans and trainers, to the scene of the massacre – her family home.

It was Friday 16 January and Ghiada was studying for exams. Her father, a pharmacist, woke from a nap, demanding tea and shouting at the younger children to be quiet. “Suddenly I could hear my cousin downstairs, screaming ‘Dead! Dead!'” A shell had hit the building – a block of five apartments, housing the extended Abu Elaish family – smashing windows and causing extensive damage to the flat below.

In the ensuing panic, Ghiada defied her father and followed him downstairs. “One room was completely black. I saw Aya [my cousin], she was on the ground with wood on top of her. There was a big hole in the wall.”

Ghiada tried pulling Aya out from under the furniture. A second shell struck. “There was a big light for a second,” she says. “I saw some windows smash and I heard screaming all around. A piece of shrapnel hit me.  I started to scream for help and then fell down unconscious.”

Ghiada’s father, Atta Mohammed abu Elaish, rushed into the room. “I saw bodies without heads and legs. I saw my daughter. I saw her mother screaming.” He ran outside to call an ambulance. “The Israelis stopped the ambulances 250 metres from the house. Some boys from the street came to start ferrying the bodies and the injured out of the building.”

The attack was one of countless assaults during Israel’s 23 days of war on Gaza – Operation Cast Lead – that began on 27 December. But it was also one of the most notorious because Ghiada’s uncle – Aya’s father – was a doctor who worked in Israeli hospitals and was well known to Israeli viewers for advocating peace and reconciliation. All through the conflict, Dr Izzeldin abu Elaish gave regular eyewitness accounts by phone in fluent Hebrew to Israeli television. Within minutes of the attack on his own family, he was back on the phone to a journalist in a Tel Aviv studio, weeping and begging for help as Israeli viewers listened: “My daughters have been killed.”

Indeed, they had: Bissan, 20, Miar, 15, and Aya, 14, were dead, along with another cousin, 17-year-old Nour. Ghiada was in a critical condition; another of the doctor’s daughters was also wounded.

The injured girls – thanks to that live TV broadcast – were unusually and swiftly evacuated to a hospital in Tel Aviv, where Ghiada was found to be suffering from multiple problems with her heart, kidneys, stomach and legs. She remained in hospital in Israel for four and a half months.

Now, Ghiada says, she thinks about that day “always”, but tries not to let others see her pain. “When I am crying, I go to my room and cry alone,” she says. Does she feel angry? No, she says, just sad. And she plans to stay put in Gaza: “Maybe others would like to emigrate, but that’s not for me.”

Toll of death and destruction

But if Ghiada expresses no bitterness, her father insists she is angry and so is the rest of the family. “It’s very hard for us,” he says. “That accident took Bissan, Nour, Miar, Aya ? and my brother.” Dr Abu Elaish has left Gaza for Canada. “He is the eldest brother, the father of the family, and now he’s gone. How can we forgive?”

The shelling of the Abu Elaish family was unusual in that it caught the attention of the Israeli public, but what Ghiada continues to endure 12 months on is shared by many of Gaza’s 750,000 children – half of its population.

More than 1,400 Gazans were killed in the 23 days of the Israeli assault, including several hundred children. The actual number is in dispute. The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR) documented 313 deaths, almost 40% of them less than 10 years old. Other Palestinian groups say the toll was much higher. More than 1,600 children were injured.

But the 23-day war is only part of the story. The long history of Israeli assaults on Gaza, and the two-and-a-half-year-long blockade of the territory after Hamas took power, has exacted a toll on almost every aspect of children’s lives: schooling, housing, leisure time, what they eat, what they wear, how they see the future.

A Gaza Community Mental Health Programme (GCMHP) survey earlier this year found that about 75% of children over the age of six were suffering from one or more symptom of post-traumatic stress disorder. Almost one in 10 ticked off every criteria.

“The majority of children suffer many psychological and social consequences,” says Dr Hasan Zeyada, a psychologist with GCMHP. “Insecurity and feelings of helplessness and powerlessness are overwhelming. We observed children becoming more anxious ? sleep disturbances, nightmares, night terror, regressive behaviour such as clinging to parents, bed wetting, becoming more restless and hyperactive, refusal to sleep alone, all the time wanting to be with their parents, overwhelmed by fears and worries. Some start to be more aggressive.”

Dr Abdel Aziz Mousa Thabet, professor of psychiatry at al-Quds university in Gaza, says the conflict has a different impact on boys and girls. “Girls have more anxiety and depression, boys are more hyperactive.”

Some children no longer look on their homes as a place of safety, security and comfort. Others don’t even have a home to go to. The Israeli bombardment damaged or destroyed more than 20,000 houses, forcing some families into tents and others into crowding in with relatives. Hamas distributed money to displaced families to rebuild their homes but the Israeli blockade has created a desperate shortage of materials. Almost one year later, some children still have no roof over their head.

Hanan Attar, a slight 10-year-old wearing flip-flops several sizes too big for her small feet, is wistful as she recalls the house destroyed by an Israeli tank shell. “We had land, my father is a farmer,” she says. “We used to grow watermelons, but the land was too close to the border and we can’t get there now.”

Home is now a tent on a patch of scrubby sand, shared by 10 members of her family, including a 50-day-old baby sister with a pinched face and a tin of formula milk perched on her rusting iron crib. The baby, Haneen, is seriously underweight at only 3kg, and is not growing. Her mother, Arfa, 40, cannot breastfeed because she is taking medication for back problems; the formula costs 45 shekels (£ 7.50) a tin, money that the family has to borrow. The father, too, is sick as well as unemployed. He reaches on top of a tall fridge that dominates the tent to pull down a sheaf of x-rays showing how his leg, broken in the conflict, is pinned together with metal.

“We are civilians, we don’t belong to any faction,” he says. “What are we guilty of so that we have to live like this? I spent my entire life building  up my home. In one hour everything was gone.”

Hanan doesn’t complain about the tent, but says “the house was better”. She adds: “A snake came one night and bit my mother. I can’t sleep at night; I’m scared of the snakes and the dogs.”

Meals are cooked on a Calor gas stove; the toilets ? a hut donated by an Arab charity ? are shared by all the families in the compound of tents. “There are big queues,” says Hanan. Winter is coming; the tent is “freezing”, she says.

There is a community of tent families, circled round the shared lavatories. The children play as all children do, kicking a football, wrestling, dragging sticks through the sand. The families are doing their best in near-impossible circumstances. Some families have even planted small gardens in the scrub: corn and a few flowers.

But Hanan ? who wants to be a doctor so she can treat the sick – says she spends most of her time in the tent with her seven brothers and sisters. Do they think they will ever go back to a proper home? “God knows,” says Arfa.

Overcrowding, lack of privacy and poverty are contributing to what some in Gaza call the “mental siege” . Tensions within families are increasing, say Gaza’s mental health experts. “Some parents themselves have depression and anxiety. Some become more aggressive towards their children,” says Zeyada.

John Ging, director of UN operations in Gaza, puts it like this: “Parents are sitting there in their homes, very upset and very frustrated at the their situation, and that is of course having ramifications for the home environment.” Has there been an increase in domestic violence? “Of course . . . children are losing respect because of the breakdown of the role-model structure. They see their parents as incapable of providing for them, they’re seeing their parents  as a failure.”

Lost childhoods

Part of the problem is the lack of release and entertainment for children. There are few gardens or parks, no cinemas or theatres, many sports facilities have been damaged or destroyed by Israeli bombing, and one of Gaza’s great natural advantages – a 25-mile stretch of sandy beach facing the Mediterranean – is hiding a fresh danger.

In the summer months, families flock to the beach on Fridays and Saturdays. The sight of children splashing in the waves is cheering until one remembers that every day 20m gallons of raw sewage is pumped into the water. Since Gaza’s sewage processing plant was bombed after the kidnap of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit in July 2006, there has been no alternative means of disposal. Now, according to Save the Children, children are developing skin diseases as well as bacterial infections from swimming in polluted water.

“There are not enough safe places for children to play,” says Mona  al-Shawa, head of the women’s unit at the PCHR. To counter this, the UN organised a hugely popular “Summer Games” during the long school break, despite objections from Hamas about boys and girls mixing together. “There were those on the political side saying kids should be going to summer camps, not doing sport and recreation, but preparing for a future life of militancy,” says Ging.

Ging says schooling has also suffered. Thirty-two of the UN’s 221 schools were damaged in the Israeli assault, plus scores more government ones. None have been repaired because Israel does not allow construction materials into Gaza, saying they could be used to make weapons.

“So the schools, where the windows were blown out or other damage was done, have been cleaned up, made safe, and continue in operation today without the physical repairs because we haven’t been allowed to bring in one pane of glass or one bag of cement since last January,” says Ging.

Israel did permit a consignment of wood into Gaza to make school desks for 8,000 children, but then blocked delivery of the steel necessary to complete them. “Now you see three kids squashed on to a desk,” says Ging. “How are teachers supposed to give each child the attention they need?”

There is also a shortage of school books and pens, and what does arrive mostly has to be smuggled through underground tunnels from Egypt.

The result is children attending overcrowded schools on a double or even triple shift system that has contributed to a continuing decline in education levels. One in five of the 200,000 pupils at the UN’s 221 schools in Gaza failed basic Arabic and maths exams this year.

Engendering extremism

“It’s shocking for them but it’s also alarming for us in terms of the future,” says Ging. “The objective of the [Israeli] policy is to counter extremism. Education is probably the most effective tool through which you will counter extremism, by developing a positive and well-educated mindset. And yet we are being prevented by the policy from educating these children.”

It is, he says, “facilitating the destruction of a civilised society and, worse than that, the development of an extreme society”.

One of the starkest examples of school destruction is the American International school, Gaza’s elite fee-paying institution in Beit Lahiya, which was bombed in the early hours of the morning of 3 January. The Israeli military claimed it was being used as a rocket-launching site. Now, where once stood science laboratories, computer rooms, a music centre and sports fields, there is a mountain of crushed masonry, twisted metal girders, broken glass and droppings from the sheep that roam the deserted site. To the side of what was once the main building lies a row of burned-out schoolbuses. The odd fragment of textbook can be seen amid the rubble.

Then there is the difficulty of trying to concentrate in class when children are clawed by hunger. Three-quarters of Gazans rely on food handouts, according to the UN. Save the Children says it is seeing newborn babies suffering from malnutrition. Anaemia, especially among girls, is common.

The UN has started feeding children in its schools because, says Ging, “they’re coming to school without breakfast and therefore their attention span is very short and the academic results will then reflect that”.

Food, at least, is something that is relatively easy to fix. There are many less tangible issues that concern child experts, such as a lack of healthy role models. “During the war, children could see that their parents could not fulfil their needs,” says Zeyada. “They see their fathers as weak, powerless. They see parents can’t give them feelings of security, can’t protect them. So they look towards other figures. That might be God as an absolute power ? so children might go towards religion, become more fanatic. Some identify with fighters from Hamas and other groups.

“Without hope, we are moving fast towards more aggressive children, more fanatics. If the siege ended you would see positive changes among children. They [Israel] are creating their enemies. They are pushing a new generation of children to believe in violence as a way of solving their difficulties. They are creating their own enemies of the future.”

In September 2007 Israel declared Gaza a “hostile entity”. “I said at that time, and I continue to say it, that’s a self-fulfilling prophecy,” says Ging. “You designate it as a hostile entity, you treat it as a hostile entity and in fact what happens is you generate hostility. And that’s precisely what we have been witnessing here at the grassroots level for the last two and a half years under this illegal siege . . . We have more extremism in Gaza every single day.”

Yet through it all, it is striking how many Palestinians cling to a belief in a better future. For all her traumas, Ghiada hasn’t given up. She attends a thrice-weekly English lesson after school to improve her chances of fulfilling her dreams.

The teacher hands Ghiada a question to answer to the class in English: If you were a colour, what colour would you choose? The girl doesn’t hesitate. “Red,” she tells the class.

The teacher asks the students what the colour red means to them. Blood, suggests one; danger, says another, both witnesses to last year’s carnage. Ghiada considers for a moment, then replies: “It makes me happy. It’s the colour of love.”

And what will Ghiada do with her English? She wants to be an airline pilot, she says.

Ironically that’s one career choice that will certainly require emigration: Gaza has no aeroplanes and the runway of its only airport was bulldozed to rubble by the Israeli army years ago.

The 23-day war in numbers

Statistics from the Gaza Community Mental Health Programme

  • 1,420 Palestinians killed,  446 of them children
  • 5,320 injured, 1,855 of them children
  • 4,000 houses destroyed
  • 16,000 houses damaged
  • 94.6% of children aged six-17 heard the sound of sonic jetfighters
  • 91.7% of them heard shelling  by artillery
  • 92% saw mutilated bodies on TV
  • 80% were deprived of water  or electricity
  • 50.7% left home for a safer place
  • 25.9% report one symptom of PTSD
  • 39.3% report more than one symptom
  • 9.8% report full criteria of PTSD

Statistics from the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights

  • 1,414 Palestinians killed during the conflict, including 313 children, of which: ? 31% girls, 69% boys
  • 15% under 5; 23.3% 5-10; 62% 11-17
  • 73% died from bombs; 19.8% from artillery shells; 5.4% shot; 1.5% from white phosphorous
  • 5,300 Palestinians injured, including 1,606 children
  • 36 UN schools damaged
  • Approximately 20,000 homes completely or partially destroyed

CIA working with Palestinian security agents

CIA working with Palestinian security agents

US agency co-operating with Palestinian counterparts who allegedly torture Hamas supporters in West Bank

Ian Cobain in Ramallah

Protesters wave Palestinian flags during a protest in the West Bank.Protesters wave Palestinian flags during a protest against the controversial Israeli barrier in the West Bank. Photograph: Fadi Arouri/Reuters

Palestinian security agents who have been detaining and allegedly torturing supporters of the Islamist organisation Hamas in the West Bank have been working closely with the CIA, the Guardian has learned.

Less than a year after Barack Obama signed an executive order that prohibited torture and provided for the lawful interrogation of detainees in US custody, evidence is emerging the CIA is co-operating with security agents whose continuing use of torture has been widely documented byhuman rights groups.

The relationship between the CIA and the two Palestinian agencies involved – Preventive Security Organisation (PSO) and General Intelligence Service (GI) – is said by some western diplomats and other officials in the region to be so close that the American agency appears to be supervising the Palestinians’ work.

One senior western official said: “The [Central Intelligence] Agency consider them as their property, those two Palestinian services.” A diplomatic source added that US influence over the agencies was so great they could be considered “an advanced arm of the war on terror”.

While the CIA and the Palestinian Authority (PA) deny the US agency controls its Palestinian counterparts, neither denies that they interact closely in the West Bank. Details of that co-operation are emerging as some human rights organisations are beginning to question whether US intelligence agencies may be turning a blind eye to abusive interrogations conducted by other countries’ intelligence agencies with whom they are working. According to the Palestinian watchdog al-Haq, human rights in the West Bank and Gaza have “gravely deteriorated due to the spreading violations committed by Palestinian actors” this year.

Most of those held without trial and allegedly tortured in the West Bank have been supporters of Hamas, which won the Palestinian elections in 2006 but is denounced as a terrorist organisation by the PA – which in turn is dominated by the rival Fatah political faction – and by the US and EU. In the Gaza Strip, where Hamas has been in control for more than two years, there have been reports of its forces detaining and torturing Fatah sympathisers in the same way.

Among the human rights organisations that have documented or complained about the mistreatment of detainees held by the PA in the West Bank are Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, al-Haq and the Israeli watchdog B’Tselem. Even the PA’s human rights commission has expressed “deep concern” over the mistreatment of detainees.

The most common complaint is that detainees are severely beaten and subjected to a torture known as shabeh, during which they are shackled and forced to assume painful positions for long periods. There have also been reports of sleep deprivation, and of large numbers of detainees being crammed into small cells to prevent rest. Instead of being brought before civilian courts, almost all the detainees enter a system of military justice under which they need not be brought before a court for six months.

According to PA officials, between 400 and 500 Hamas sympathisers are held by the PSO and GI.

Some of the mistreatment has been so severe that at least three detainees have died in custody this year. The most recent was Haitham Amr, a 33-year-old nurse and Hamas supporter from Hebron who died four days after he was detained by GI officials last June. Extensive bruising around his kidneys suggested he had been beaten to death. Among those who died in GI custody last year was Majid al-Barghuti, 42, an imam at a village near Ramallah.

While there is no evidence that the CIA has been commissioning such mistreatment, human rights activists say it would end promptly if US pressure was brought to bear on the Palestinian authorities.

Shawan Jabarin, general director of al-Haq, said: “The Americans could stop it any time. All they would have to do is go to [prime minister] Salam Fayyad and tell him they were making it an issue.. Then they could deal with the specifics: they could tell him that detainees needed to be brought promptly before the courts.”

A diplomat in the region said “at the very least” US intelligence officers were aware of the torture and not doing enough to stop it. He added: “There are a number of questions for the US administration: what is their objective, what are their rules of engagement? Do they train the GI and PSO according to the manual which was established by the previous administration, including water-boarding? Are they in control, or are they just witnessing?”

Sa’id Abu-Ali, the PA’s interior minister, accepted detainees had been tortured and some had died, but said such abuses had not been official policy and steps were being taken to prevent them. He said such abuses “happen in every country in the world”. Abu-Ali sought initially to deny the CIA was “deeply involved” with the two Palestinian intelligence agencies responsible for the torture of Hamas sympathisers, but then conceded that links did exist. “There is a connection, but there is no supervision by the Americans,” he said. “It is solely a Palestinian affair. But the Americans help us.”

The CIA does not deny working with the PSO and GI in the West Bank, although it will not say what use it has made of intelligence extracted during the interrogation of Hamas supporters. But it denies turning what one official described as “a Nelson’s eye to abuse”.

The CIA’s spokesman, Paul Gimigliano, denied it played a supervisory role over the PSO or GI. “The notion that this agency somehow runs other intelligence services … is simply wrong,” he said. “The CIA … only supports, and is interested in, lawful methods that produce sound intelligence.”

Concern about detainee abuse is growing in the West Bank despite an effort by the international community to create Palestinian institutions that will guarantee greater security as a first step towards creating a Palestinian state. More than half of the PA’s $2.8bn (£1.66bn) budget came from international donors last year; more than a quarter was swallowed up by the ministry of the interior and national security. Human Rights Watch and al-Haq have said that in raising the security capacity of the PA, donor countries have a responsibility to ensure it observes international human rights standards.

At the heart of the international effort is the creation of the Palestinian national security force, a 7,500-strong gendarmerie trained by US, British, Canadian and Turkish army officers under the command of a US general, Keith Dayton. Many Palestinians blame Dayton for the mistreatment of Hamas sympathisers, although the general’s remit does not extend to either of the intelligence agencies responsible.

Some in Dayton’s team are said to have been warned by senior CIA officers that they should not attempt to interfere in the work of the PSO or GI. Privately, some of them are said to fear that the mistreatment of detainees, and the anger this is arousing among the population, may undermine their mission. One source said: “I know that Dayton and his crew are very concerned about what is happening in those detention centres because they know it can jeopardise their work.”

The Truth About America And Pakistan

The Truth About America And Pakistan

JEFF GATES
AMERICA-AND-PAKISTAN

Part 1: America Needs Pakistan’s Help — Again

Ordinary Americans need the assistance of Islamabad now more than at any time in the past six decades. That aid lies not in combating “Islamo fascism” but in countering the influence inside the U.S. of Israeli war-planners known for their expertise at provoking extremism.

To grasp what must be done requires a review of three related developments. First is a policy-making legacy from the era of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Second is a little known account of an Israeli attempt to corrupt policy-making in Indonesia, home to the world’s largest Muslim population. Third is confirmation that, by its steady growth in influence over the past six decades, Israel is now shaping U.S. policy to advance a Judeo-fascist agenda.

The Bhutto Legacy

Soon after Richard Nixon was elected president in November 1968, Dr. Glenn Olds traveled to Dubrovnik to meet with Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. The popular Bhutto knew China’s Chou En-Lai with whom he had studied in Moscow. Dr. Olds traveled on Nixon’s behalf to ask that Bhutto intercede with China.

Glenn-OldsAs a young foreign minister for President Ayub Khan, Bhutto forged stronger Pakistani ties with China after the Sino-Indian war of 1962. That relationship led to a large number of Sino-Pakistan industrial and military projects.

When he signed the Sino-Pakistan Boundary Agreement of March 1963, the father of Benazir Bhutto (then age 10) emerged as one of the most visible Pakistanis on the world stage. By the 1968 meeting in Yugoslavia, the politically ambitious Bhutto had been arrested and released by Ayub, sparking political unrest that led to Ayub’s resignation and Bhutto’s ascendancy to the presidency in December 1971 and prime minister in 1973.

The Dubrovnik meeting marked America’s first step in the normalization of relations with China. Bhutto’s assistance also helped hasten the end of the U.S. war in Vietnam. Following the Nixon inaugural in January 1969, Dr. Olds was appointed U.N. Ambassador after he helped recruit more than 1,000 people for Nixon, including Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney.
As Executive Dean of the 64-campus State University of New York for Governor Nelson Rockefeller, Dr. Olds crafted a memo for the governor urging that he campaign for the presidency in 1968 on a platform promising to end the Vietnam War and normalize relations with China. One key challenge: making contact with Mao Tse-Tung who had never left China. Thus Dr. Olds’ strategy proposed Bhutto as the intermediary to Mao through Chou En-Lai.

PAKISTAN

When Nelson Rockefeller opted not to run in 1968 (at least initially), he urged that Dr. Olds share the strategy with others. When Pepsi Chairman Don Kendall brought the memo to Nixon’s attention, the candidate agreed to include the strategy in his campaign and, should he win, asked that Dr. Olds help form an administration. Henry Kissinger received the Nobel peace prize in 1973 for advancing policies that began with that memo for Nelson Rockefeller.

Dr. Olds conveyed to me this account in 2003. Since 1994, he had served as the senior adviser to James M. (“Mel”) Rockefeller. An adviser to four presidents (two of each party) and four of the five third-generation Rockefeller brothers, Dr. Olds died in March 2006 after describing his dismay at “the depth of the treason” uncovered by Mel Rockefeller. That treason remains ongoing-a key reason Americans need the assistance of Pakistan.

Guilt by Association marks the first release in the Criminal State series of books. This series documents a deeply imbedded criminality coordinated through the same trans-generational network of Jewish Zionists granted nation-state recognition in 1948 by Harry Truman, a Christian Zionist president.

As these facts become transparent and the perpetrators apparent, Pakistan-as an ally of the U.S.-must play a leadership role in the Muslim community by insisting that the U.S. withdraw its recognition of this extremist enclave as a legitimate nation-state.

Absent that withdrawal, Americans will continue to be endangered by those who believe that U.S. behavior reflects the policies of our government rather than the policies of Zionist extremists imbedded inside our government.

The Indonesian Connection

Dr. Olds knew about Mel Rockefeller’s meetings in Jakarta in mid-March 2001 with Arie Kumaat, Director of Indonesian Intelligence. The defense minister of India had just been toppled by a bribe involving an Israeli defense firm. Malaysian intelligence had just discovered a similar attempt by Tel Aviv to discredit its defense chief-likewise six months prior to 9-11.

jeff21

Kumaat had uncovered a multi-billion dollar Israeli bribe to the Indonesian parliament to push the U.S. out of the region in favor of China. Kumaat balked at reporting his findings to the U.S. embassy for fear that he was also reporting to Israel. From 1986-1989, the U.S. Ambassador to Indonesia was Zionist war-planner Paul Wolfowitz.

Not until the mass murder of 9-11 did Dr. Olds fully grasp how Mel Rockefeller’s lengthy experience could prove the common Judeo-fascist source of much of the world’s violence. After that murderous provocation, Kumaat agreed to arrange a meeting for Mel Rockefeller with former Indonesian president Abdurrahman Wahid, a respected religious leader for 80 million moderate Muslim men. A follow-on meeting was anticipated with Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir who has long opposed the geopolitical manipulations of Jewish extremists.

That Islam-focused strategy for blocking the March 2003 invasion of Iraq was stymied when, in January 2002, Kumaat died of a heart attack-the plausible reason given for his death though an autopsy by his wife detected the drug used to induce a heart attack. An interview of his son, Henrie, confirmed the details.

jeff22

We now know that 911-related intelligence was “fixed” around a preset agenda for Greater Israel long sought by Israelis and pro-Israelis with the help of Iraqi liar Ahmad Chalabi, an asset developed over decades by Zionist war-planners Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz.

Pakistan must realize that the same mental and emotional manipulation deployed to induce a U.S.-led invasion of Iraq is now being used to provoke an invasion of Iran. By destabilizing Pakistan and portraying its western provinces as a haven for Al Qaeda, Zionists will make it appear that Islamabad’s nuclear arsenal is insecure. That perception heightens the plausibility of an attack on the Islamic Republic of Iran, citing a nuclear risk.

That perceived insecurity also strengthens the rationale for an Israeli operation-flying the U.S. flag-to take over the government of Pakistan. What could soon happen to Islamabad directly is what happened to the U.S. over decades indirectly.

The Depth of the Duplicity

Pakistan must quickly realize-and candidly acknowledge-that the Obama presidency is even more thoroughly staffed by Zionists than the Bush administration and even the notoriously pro-Israeli Clinton presidency.

In 2003, Dr. Olds shared an insight about Clinton Secretary of State Madeleine Albright who claimed an epiphany in 1997 that she was Jewish-after she became our top diplomat. In 1951, while serving as chaplain at the University of Denver, Dr. Olds was dispatched as the university emissary to welcome to Denver the wife and daughter of Soviet Bloc defector Josef Korbel, a former Czech diplomat and then professor of international studies.

Dr. Olds described how the future Mrs. Albright-then a pigtailed teenager with braces-stepped onto the train platform carrying the family menorah. He knew the family well. He dismissed her “epiphany” decades later as “simply not believable.”

Josef Korbel emerged as the mentor to Condoleezza Rice when she entered the University of Denver at an impressionable age 15 and he guided her into Russian studies. In September 2000, Albright named the State Department building after Harry Truman, the president best known abroad for overruling his Secretary of State George C. Marshall in 1948 when the former WWII general strenuously objected to our recognition of an extremist enclave as a legitimate state.

Jeff Gates is a widely acclaimed author, attorney, merchant banker, educator and consultant to governments worldwide; served for seven years as counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance.

Is this the Reason for the Poisoning Attack?

[SEE: Taliban Attempt to Murder Leadership of Islamic Parties]

Jamaat leader says US, India behind terror acts

Monday, December 07, 2009
Our correspondent

MANSEHRA: Vowing to observe December 14-16 as black days, Jamaat-e-Islami leader Liaqat Baloch Sunday blamed the pro-US polices behind the growing incidents of terrorism in the country.

“There are proofs of US and Indian involvements in terrors activities in the country but the rulers are bent on killing their own countrymen,” he said. The JI leader condemned the series of blasts in the country, adding, there was no room for terrorism in Islam. “Islam is a religion of peace and some elements are out to earn a bad name to it by carrying out such activities,” he told reporters after speaking at a convention of the party.

JI leaders Possessor Muhammad Ibrahim, Mairajuddin, Tariq Sherazi and Youas Khattak were also present on the occasion. Liaqat Baloch said the government should try to resolve issues through talks.

“War is no solution to problems and the government must hold talks with Taliban for a durable peace in the country,” he added. He said Interior Minister Rehman Malik had contacted him seeking party’s cooperation and he would respond after consulting the leadership.

To a question, the JI general secretary said US and India were involved in the Rawalpindi and Peshawar attacks and the government should abandon its pro-America policies. He said that his party would observe the December 14 to 16 as black day against current spate of terrorism and Indian and American involvement in the terror activities.

Baloch said the Awami National Party-led NWFP government had failed to protect Pakhtuns. Baloch said that the US embassy in federal capital had been changed into a ‘mini-Pentagon’ and the government should realise the seriousness of the situation.

Baloch said that after the withdrawal of National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) bill from the National Assembly, the people wanted the Supreme Court to help recover the plundered national wealth. He said the SC would hear the National Reconciliation Ordinance cases today and the JI would establish a welcome camp outside the court building to appreciate the role of the apex court.

The True Cost of Maintaining “The Crown”

UK hit hardest by banking bailout, with £1trillion spent to save the City

By SAM FLEMING

The burden of the banking bailout has been heavier in Britain than the rest of the western world, according to alarming figures published today.

The UK has committed public funds worth almost 75 per cent of national income, or around £1trillion, to saving the City, according to the Bank of England.

That compares with bailout costs worth just 30 per cent of gross domestic product in the Euro Zone and 50 per cent in the United States.

Expensive bailout: Saving the City from its own greed cost UK taxpayers £1trillion

Expensive bailout: Saving the City from its own greed cost UK taxpayers £1trillion

The staggering numbers, contained in the Bank’s biannual Financial Stability Report, underline the terrible price the British public has paid following a binge of risk-taking in the City.

The official aid includes injections of cash into banks, state guarantees of their debts, and central bank interventions.

And despite receiving such vast quantities of taxpayer help, banks’ finances remain hugely over-stretched and vulnerable to economic setbacks, the report warned.

The Euro Zone figures are an average, which hides variations in the state aid between individual countries.

But British lenders will have to find the money to re-finance £1trillion of their debts in the coming years.

More…

The Bank urged banking bosses to hoard far more of their earnings in future, rather than paying out big bonuses and dividends.

Cutting bankers’ pay by just a tenth and dividends by a third over the next five years could save £70billion, which could be used to shore up firms’ finances, the Bank said.

That comes after banking bosses gave out £375billion to employees and shareholders in the eight years leading up to the credit crunch.

Demands that lenders conserve more cash will further enrage bankers who feel they are already being unfairly punished by measures such as the new bonus tax.

This week Royal Bank of Scotland chief Stephen Hester attacked political interference in his pay policies, saying his inability to offer big bonuses had helped wipe £15billion from his firm’s share price.

Interference not welcome: RBS boss Stephen Hester attacked political interference, saying his inability to offer big bonuses helped wipe £15billion from his firm's share price

Interference not welcome: RBS boss Stephen Hester attacked political interference, saying his inability to offer big bonuses helped wipe £15billion from his firm’s share price

Yet the Bank report spells out the deep-seated damage the banks are continuing to do to the economy.

It warned that the cost of shoring up the financial system has ‘put pressure on national balance sheets in a number of countries’.

And after Ireland and Greece suffered cuts to their credit ratings, the Bank said there could be further downgrades ahead in the absence of ‘credible’ deficit-cutting plans.

While this part of the report did not mention Britain, some investors are afraid our prime triple-A credit rating will be cut in the coming months.

The Bank also warned that while British families are benefiting from ultra-low interest rates now, that will not always remain the case.

The report said household finances are ‘stretched’ as debts remain at near-record levels when measured against assets such as houses.

Arrears on unsecured loans such as credit cards and overdrafts ‘remain high,’ and many borrowers will be hit by ‘ payment shocks’ as mortgage deals expire and they move on to variable-rate loans.

And while savers have enjoyed one of the biggest stock-market rallies in British history in recent months, there are serious dangers of a reversal as interest rates increase, the report said.

Meanhile, yesterday further evidence emerged of enduring pain triggered by the financial crisis as yet another foreign country clawed its way out of recession ahead of Britain.

Ireland grew 0.3 per cent in the third quarter compared with the previous three months, official figures showed.

The UK is not expected to start growing until the fourth quarter of the year.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1236800/UK-hit-hardest-banking-bailout-1trillion-spent-save-City.html#ixzz0a5jgIwLx